AGENDA R

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Council Meeting

                            

TUESDAY 28 AUGUST 2018

 

6.30pm

 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

Live Streaming of Council Meeting

 

In the spirit of open, accessible and transparent government, this meeting of the Inner West Council is being streamed live on Council’s website. By speaking at a Council meeting, members of the public agree to being recorded and must ensure their speech to the Council is respectful and use appropriate language. A person who uses defamatory, discriminatory or offensive language may be exposed to liability for which Council takes no responsibility. Any part of this meeting that is held in closed session will not be recorded

 

Pre-Registration to Speak at Council Meetings

 

Members of the public must register by 2pm of the day of the Meeting to speak at Council Meetings. If you wish to register to speak please fill in a Register to Speak Form, available from the Inner West Council website, including:

 

Are there any rules for speaking at a Council Meeting?

The following rules apply when addressing a Council meeting:

 

What happens after I submit the form?

Your request will then be added to a list that is shown to the Chairperson on the night of the meeting.

 

Where Items are deferred, Council reserves the right to defer speakers until that Item is heard on the next occasion.

 

Accessibility

 

Inner West Council is committed to ensuring people with a disability have equal opportunity to take part in Council and Committee Meetings. At the Ashfield Council Chambers there is a hearing loop service available to assist persons with a hearing impairment. If you have any other access or disability related participation needs and wish to know more, call 9392 5657.

 

Persons in the public gallery are advised that under the Local Government Act 1993, a person may NOT tape record a Council meeting without the permission of Council.

 

Any persons found recording without authority will be expelled from the meeting.

 

“Record” includes the use of any form of audio, video and still camera equipment or mobile phone capable of recording speech.

 

An audio recording of this meeting will be taken for the purpose of verifying the accuracy of the minutes.  

 

 

   


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

 

PRECIS

 

 

1          Acknowledgement of Country

 

2          Apologies

 

3          Notice of Webcasting

 

4          Disclosures of Interest (Section 451 of the Local Government Act
and Council’s Code of Conduct)
 

 

5          Moment of Quiet Contemplation

 

6          Confirmation of Minutes                                                                                         Page

Minutes of 14 August 2018 Council Meeting                                                                    5

7          Mayoral Minutes

 

Nil at the time of printing.

8          Staff Reports

 

Volume 1 of 2

 

ITEM                                                                                                                                     Page

 

C0818(3) Item 1       Supporting Anzac Day across the Inner West                                       32

C0818(3) Item 2       Sponsorship policy                                                                                 35

C0818(3) Item 3       Media and social media policies for Councillors                                    57

C0818(3) Item 4       Local Democracy - outcomes of proposed new advisory group structure public exhibition                                                                                                 71

C0818(3) Item 5       Funding Proposals for Balmain Public Square Heritage Project         102

C0818(3) Item 6       Dawn Fraser Baths Master Plan and Essential Works Update           112

C0818(3) Item 7       Draft Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre (LPAC) Master Plan                203

C0818(3) Item 8       Draft Marrickville Road (East) Public Domain Master Plan: Feedback from Public Exhibition                                                                                              414

C0818(3) Item 9       Events in Parks Policy & Events in Parks Guidelines                         537

C0818(3) Item 10     Ferris Lane, Annandale - Potential Conversion to a Park                    592

C0818(3) Item 11     Change in parking meter operational hours in the side streets of Leichhardt, Rozelle and Balmain                                                                                          600

C0818(3) Item 12     Victoria Street, Ashfield - Proposed combined bus stop and pedestrian crossover facility opposite Cardinal Freeman Village                                           654

Volume 2 of 2

 

C0818(3) Item 13     Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 7 August 2018                   665

C0818(3) Item 14     Victoria Road Precinct, Marrickville, Development Control Plan Amendment                                                                                                              699

C0818(3) Item 15     Interim heritage order and heritage assessment of dwellings at 73 and 73A The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill                                                                      794

C0818(3) Item 16     Street Libraries in the Inner West                                                         839

C0818(3) Item 17     Referral of Draft 30 June 2018 Financial Statements for Audit          842

C0818(3) Item 18     Investment Report as at 30 June 2018                                                843

C0818(3) Item 19     Investment Report as at 31 July 2018                                                 877

C0818(3) Item 20     Status of Legal Proceedings                                                                904

9          Notices of Motion

 

ITEM                                                                                                                                          Page

 

C0818(3) Item 21     Notice of Motion: Glebe Island Proposals: Inner West Working With City Of Sydney                                                                                                              915

 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

 

Minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting held on 14 August 2018

 

Meeting commenced at 6.32pm

 

 

 

 

 

Present:

Darcy Byrne

Julie Passas

Marghanita Da Cruz Mark Drury

Lucille McKenna OAM

Colin Hesse

Sam Iskandar

Tom Kiat

Pauline Lockie

Victor Macri

Rochelle Porteous

Vittoria Raciti

John Stamolis

Louise Steer

Anna York

Elizabeth Richardson

Mayor

Deputy Mayor

Councillor

Councillor

Councillor

Councillor

Councillor

Councillor

Councillor

Councillor

Councillor

Councillor

Councillor

Councillor (6.40pm)

Councillor

Deputy General Manager Assets and Environment

Nellette Kettle

 

Group Manager Civic and Executive Support, Integration,

Customer Service and Business Excellence

Cathy Edwards-Davis

David Bird

Ian Naylor

Group Manager Trees, Parks and Sports Fields

Group Manager Strategic Planning

Manager Civic and Executive Support

Katherine Paixao

Business Paper Coordinator (Minute Taker)

 

APOLOGIES:       

 

Motion: (Hesse/Macri)

 

THAT Apologies from Clr Steer for lateness be accepted.

 

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis and York

Against Motion:          Nil

 

DISCLOSURES OF INTERESTS:  

 

Clr Kiat declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 35 -  Notice of Motion: Gambling Harm Prevention and Reduction Policy as the law firm he works for has run litigation against Aristocrat which produces electronic gambling machines and he was not involved.

 

Motion: (Byrne/Hesse)

 

THAT Council receive and note the declarations of interest.

 

 

 

 

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis and York

Against Motion:          Nil

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

 

Motion: (Stamolis/Macri)

THAT the Minutes of the Council Meeting held on Tuesday, 24 July 2018 be confirmed as a correct record.

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis and York

Against Motion:          Nil

 

Councillor Steer entered the Meeting at 6:40 pm.

 

Acknowledgement of Retirement Long Servicing Staff Member Ross Musso

 

Motion: (Macri/Iskandar)

 

THAT Council acknowledge the many years of service to Marrickville and Inner West Councils of Ross Musso and thank him for his dedication.

 

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:                    Nil

 

C0818(1) Item 1  Mayoral Minute: Marion Street Carpark

Motion: (Byrne)

 

THAT:

 

  1. Council be provided with a report outlining potential improvements to the Marion Street car park to:

·                      

a.   Increase space availability for use during school drop off and pick up at Leichhardt Public School;

b.   Facilitate greater opportunities for utilisation by the public;

 

2.   The Report include a review of staff parking permit arrangements;

 

3.   The report on potential improvements to the Marion Street car park be brought back to Council within three months; and

 

4.   Council undertake a review of how we can simplify parking signs throughout the municipality and be brought to the traffic committee.

 

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:                    Nil

 

 

C0818(1) Item 2  Mayoral Minute: Public Library Funding

Motion: (Byrne)

 

THAT Council:

1.   Endorse the NSW Public Libraries Association and Local Government NSW library funding advocacy initiative, Renew Our Libraries;

2.   Take a leading role in activating the campaign locally;

3.   Endorse the distribution of the NSW Public Libraries Association and Local Government NSW library funding advocacy initiative information in Council libraries, as well as involvement in any actions arising from the initiative; and

4.   Formally advise the NSW Public Libraries Association and Local Government NSW that Council has endorsed the library funding advocacy initiative.

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:                    Nil

 

Suspension of Standing Orders

 

Motion : (Drury/Macri)

 

THAT Council bring forward Items 36 and 37 to be dealt with at this time.

 

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Porteous, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Crs Passas and Raciti

 

Councillor Passas left the Meeting at 7:25 pm.

 

C0818(1) Item 36       Notice of Motion: May Murray Early Learning Centre

Motion: (York/Iskandar)

 

THAT Council:

 

1.   Confirm no further consideration will be given the relocation of the May Murray Early Learning Centre to the new Steel Park centre, and that the service will continue at its current location in Premier St; and

2.   Confirm enrolments and wait listing for 2019 onwards will proceed on this basis.

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Nil

Absent:                                  Cr Passas

 

Councillor Passas returned to the Meeting at 7:36 pm.

 

 

 

C0818(1) Item 37       Notice of Motion: Save Globe-Wilkins Preschool

Motion: (York/Iskandar)

 

THAT Council support the parents and community involved in the Save Globe-Wilkins Preschool campaign by:

 

1.   Continuing to lobby the NSW Department of Education and Minister for Education to retain the award-winning Globe-Wilkins Preschool at its current location within Wilkins Public School – including seeking a meeting with the Minister and parents involved in the Save Globe-Wilkins Preschool Campaign;

 

2.   Supporting the proposed Save Globe-Wilkins Family Fun Day at Marrickville Park on August 26, by facilitating bookings for the necessary space in the park and waiving associated fees; and

 

3.   Helping to promote the Family Fun Day event through Council’s social media channels and leafleting the surrounding area in Marrickville and Petersham.

 

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Cr Passas

 

Suspension of Standing Orders

 

Motion : (Drury/Steer)

 

THAT Council bring forward Items 11, 12, 19, 25, 27, 31, 34 and 35 to be dealt with at this time.

 

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Nil

 

Councillor Passas left the Meeting at 7:53 pm.

 

C0818(1) Item 11       GreenWay Master Plan

Motion: (York/McKenna OAM)

 

THAT:

 

1.         The GreenWay Master Plan: Cooks to Cove GreenWay be adopted;

 

2.         An implementation report be brought to Council identifying the following       components of the Greenway project:


a)           A schedule and key delivery dates for capital works program;


b)           Cost minimisation, risk mitigation and project management strategies;


c)           Community consultation and communications plans - which must detail                   the approach to resident input (along the IAP2 public participation                          spectrum) and provide a cost / benefit analysis that recognises the value                         IWC places on appropriately increasing the say local residents can have                        about the area in which we live. The plans should also give                                              consideration to resident requests for additional general information                  sessions and stakeholder / residential working   groups, and other                    proposed consultation mechanisms;

3.         An independent project assurance advisor be appointed for the Greenway project to provide scrutiny, oversight and review of the project at key stage gates for the various links, including tender release, contract awarding, pre-commissioning and practical completion;

 

4.         Resources required to operate and maintain the Greenway are identified as part of the Operational Management Plan - including resources required to support Greenway biodiversity as identified in the Masterplan documents released for public exhibition;

 

5.         Any reference to the dead Sydenham to Bankstown Urban Renewal Strategy is deleted from the final Masterplan;

 

6.         The final master plan be amended to exclude the informal path between Hathern and Marion St to light rail, in favour of protection of identified bird habitat in this area (Item 2.01 in the master plan);

 

7.         The proposed raised threshold at Weston St be amended to exclude the proposed bird hide (Item 3.05 in the master plan);

 

8.         The master plan note that Council supports a route adjacent to the light rail with an exit via a tunnel under Davis St as the preferred Greenway route through Waratah Mills (Item 4.02 & 4.06 in the master plan);

 

9.         The final master plan be amended to exclude the informal path between Hill St and Pigott St (Item 4.03 in the master plan);

 

10.      Final master plan be amended to include consideration of either full or partial acquisition of 43 Hercules St (Item 5.01 in the master plan) and staff amend the final master plan priorities to cover the increased costs of full acquisition if required;

 

11.      Additional bike access along Ewart St and The Parade is explored with RMS (Item 6.01-6.05 in the master plan);

 

12.      The recommendation for the option of an overpass at Marion Street be deleted; and

 

13.      The inclusion of and protection of the Rail heritage at the Lewisham West Light rail station.

 

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Nil

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amendments (York/McKenna OAM)


1.         An implementation report be brought to Council identifying the following     components of the Greenway project:


a)           A schedule and key delivery dates for capital works program;


b)           Cost minimisation, risk mitigation and project management strategies;


c)           Community consultation and communications plans - which must detail                   the approach to resident input (along the IAP2 public participation                          spectrum) and provide a cost / benefit analysis that recognises the value                         IWC places on appropriately increasing the say local residents can have                        about the area in which we live. The plans should also give                                              consideration to resident requests for additional general information                  sessions and stakeholder / residential working groups, and other                      proposed consultation mechanisms;

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Nil

 

As the Amendment was carried it was incorporated into the Primary Motion.

 

2.         An independent project assurance advisor be appointed for the Greenway   project to  provide scrutiny, oversight and review of the project at key stage         gates for the various links, including tender release, contract awarding, pre-     commissioning and practical completion;

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Nil

 

As the Amendment was carried it was incorporated into the Primary Motion.

 

3.         Resources required to operate and maintain the Greenway are identified as part     of the Operational Management Plan - including resources required to support      Greenway      biodiversity as identified in the Masterplan documents released for      public exhibition;

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Nil

 

As the Amendment was carried it was incorporated into the Primary Motion.

 

4.       Any reference to the dead Sydenham to Bankstown Urban Renewal Strategy is deleted from the final Masterplan;

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Nil

 

As the Amendment was carried it was incorporated into the Primary Motion.


5.         The final master plan be amended to exclude the informal path between        Hathern and Marion St to light rail, in favour of protection of identified bird       habitat in this area (Item 2.01 in the master plan);

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Nil

 

As the Amendment was carried it was incorporated into the Primary Motion.

 

6.       The proposed raised threshold at Weston St be amended to exclude the proposed bird hide (Item 3.05 in the master plan);

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Nil

 

As the Amendment was carried it was incorporated into the Primary Motion.


7.         The master plan note that Council supports a route adjacent to the light rail             with     an exit via a tunnel under Davis St as the preferred Greenway route    through Waratah Mills (Item 4.02 & 4.06 in the master plan);

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Nil

 

As the Amendment was carried it was incorporated into the Primary Motion.

 

8.       The final master plan be amended to exclude the informal path between Hill St and Pigott St (Item 4.03 in the master plan);

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Nil

 

As the Amendment was carried it was incorporated into the Primary Motion.


9.         Final master plan be amended to include consideration of either full or partial          acquisition of 43 Hercules St (Item 5.01 in the master plan) and staff amend the        final master plan priorities to cover the increased costs of full acquisition if    required;

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Cr Passas

 

As the Amendment was carried it was incorporated into the Primary Motion.

 

 

 

10.     Additional bike access along Ewart St and The Parade is explored with RMS (Item 6.01-6.05 in the master plan); and

 

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Nil

 

As the Amendment was carried it was incorporated into the Primary Motion.

 

11.       The recommendation for the option of an overpass at Marion Street be deleted.

 

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Raciti, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Crs Da Cruz, Kiat, Porteous and Stamolis

 

As the Amendment was carried it was incorporated into the Primary Motion.

 

Amendment (Stamolis)

 

THAT Council should in principle retain the overpass of Marion Street in the GreenWay masterplan.

 

The Mayor Ruled this Out of Order.

 

Amendment (Da Cruz/Hesse)

 

The inclusion of and protection of the Rail heritage at the Lewisham West Light rail station.

 

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Porteous, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Crs Passas and Raciti

 

As the Amendment was carried it was incorporated into the Primary Motion.

 

ADJOURNMENT

 

8.41pm - The Mayor, Clr Byrne adjourned the meeting for a short recess.

8.56pm– The Mayor, Clr Byrne resumed the meeting.

 

Councillors Passas and Raciti returned to the Meeting at 8:59 pm.

Councillor Kiat returned to the Meeting at 9:01 pm.

 

The Mayor ruled that the subject of the light rail station at Gladstone Park could be raised as part of the debate on Item 12 - Parkfit-Fitness Stations in Parks.

 

Dissent in the Chairperson’s ruling

 

Motion: (Porteous/Hesse)

 

THAT dissent be raised in the Chairperson’s ruling.

 

 

 

 

Motion Lost

For Motion:                 Crs Da Cruz, Hesse, Kiat, Lockie, Porteous, Stamolis and Steer

Against Motion:          Crs Byrne, Drury, Iskandar, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Raciti and York

 

The Mayor’s ruling was upheld.

 

Councillors Hesse and Macri left the Meeting at 9.28 pm.

 

C0818(1) Item 12       Parkfit-Fitness Stations in Parks

Motion (Byrne/Passas)

 

THAT Council:

 

  1. Not proceed with the proposed fitness stations at Gladstone Park and Smith, Hogan and Spindler’s Park and instead bring a further report following consultation with ward councillors and residents on possible locations within the former Leichhardt Local Government Area where the stations could be located including:

 

-       Ewenton Park;

-       Cohen Park;

-       Adjacent to Leichhardt No. 3 ground (near La Montage); and

-       36th Battalion Park.

 

  1. Endorse the former Leichhardt Councils opposition to locating a light rail station in Gladstone Park; and

 

  1. Details criteria for where fitness stations should be put prior to the selection of any park.

 

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Drury, Iskandar, Lockie, McKenna OAM, Passas, Raciti, Stamolis and York

Against Motion:          Crs Da Cruz, Kiat, Porteous and Steer

Absent:                        Crs Hesse and Macri

 

Foreshadowed Motion: (Stamolis)

 

THAT Council:

 

  1. Not proceed with the proposed fitness stations at Gladstone Park and Smith, Hogan and Spindler’s Park and instead bring a further report following consultation with ward councillors and residents on possible locations within the former Leichhardt Local Government Area where the stations could be located including:

 

-       Ewenton Park;

-       Cohen Park;

-       Adjacent to Leichhardt No. 3 ground (near La Montage); and

-       36th Battalion Park.

 

  1. Details criteria for where fitness stations should be put prior to the selection of any park.

 

This Foreshadowed Motion Lapsed.

 

Councillor Hesse returned to the meeting at 9.31pm

 

Suspension of Standing Orders

 

Motion: (Byrne/Passas)

 

That Council bring forward all registered speakers to speak at this time and then subsequent to hearing the speakers, debate the items that registered speakers spoke to.

 

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Cr Hesse

 

ADJOURNMENT

 

10.06pm - The Mayor, Clr Byrne adjourned the meeting for a short recess.

10.09pm– The Mayor, Clr Byrne resumed the meeting.

 

C0818(1) Item 19       Notice of Motion: King George Park, Rozelle – Additional         Facilities

Motion: (Byrne/Passas)

 

THAT a report be brought to Council which investigates the provision of change room and shower facilities at King George Park, including discussion of the priority of this park facility project in relation to other park facility projects which are scheduled in Council’s current capital expenditure program.

 

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Nil

 

C0818(1) Item 25       Notice of Motion: Remediation of Asbestos Contamination at 101       Australia Street Camperdown and Public Areas of Australia    Street Camperdown

Motion: (Steer/Lockie)

 

THAT:

 

1.   Council ensure that the owner of 101 Australia Street Camperdown remove the asbestos from its site in accordance with Council’s order of 22 June 2018 within 7 days of this motion;

 

2.   If the owner of 101 Australia Street Camperdown fails to comply with Council’s order of 22 June 2018 within 7 days of this motion, Council will enforce its order of 22  June 2018 without further notice;

 

3.   Council keep residents of Stanmore Ward advised of all measures taken to remediate asbestos contamination in Australia Street Camperdown, including when work will be completed;

 

4.   Council liaise regularly with affected residents and  third parties including third party insurance assessors in relation to progress and completion of remediation work by Council;

 

5.   Council hold a public meeting with residents of Australia Street and Eton Street Camperdown and Stanmore Ward generally to inform them of Council’s measures to remediate asbestos contamination;

 

6.   Council allocate resources for monitoring of the affected site until remediation is complete; and

 

7.   A report on how Council can adopt the office of Local Government Model Asbestos Policy for NSW and Council’s enforcement and compliance policy by 30 October 2018.

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Porteous, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Crs Passas and Raciti

 

C0818(1) Item 27       Notice of Motion: Request for Investigation into Administrative           Decisions

Motion: (Passas/Raciti)

 

THAT an independent investigative authority be engaged to seek answers to:

 

a)   The 2013 LEP in connection with the number of properties that were identified as heritage items and some that were subsequently removed;

 

b)   Original estimates for the Ashfield Pool upgrade which has subsequently increased by over 100%; and

 

c)   The manner in which Code of Conduct complaints were managed during the last term of council.

 

Motion Lost

For Motion:                 Crs Macri, Passas, Raciti and Stamolis

Against Motion:                    Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, McKenna                                              OAM, Porteous, Steer and York

 

Extension of Time

 

Motion: (Stamolis/Drury)

 

THAT the meeting be extended for 15 minutes.

 

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Nil

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C0818(1) Item 31       Notice of Motion: Condolence Motion Sr Salamao

Motion: (Byrne/Lockie)

 

THAT Council writes a letter of condolence to the family of Sr Salamao, recognizing his contributions to the community of Maliana, in partnership with the Friends of Maliana group.

 

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:                    Nil

 

C0818(1) Item 34       Notice of Motion: WestConnex Noise Mitigation

Motion: (Lockie/Byrne)

 

THAT Council support residents living near WestConnex construction and operational sites who have been denied proper noise mitigation (soundproofing) measures by:

 

  1. Writing to the Premier, relevant Ministers, and the Sydney Motorway Corporation to:

 

a.   Express our concern and frustration that residents near WestConnex construction sites are continuing to be denied full noise mitigation measures, even where there’s proof that they’re living with unacceptable levels of day and/or night noise;

 

b.   Request that residents living near WestConnex construction sites are provided with full soundproofing measures (usually defined as Type 2 noise mitigation measures in project EISs) with the cost to be borne by the project proponent, and that these noise mitigation measures are installed without any further delay; and

 

c.   Reiterate our request that residents are offered alternative accommodation during any periods of night works where intrusive noise will arise.

 

2.   Advocating on behalf of individual residents who request Council’s support on this matter.

 

  1. Writing to the Department of Planning & Environment asking when the Westconnex M4 East Project the Operational Noise and Vibration Review (ONVR) will be made public.

 

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:                    Nil

 

Extension of Time

 

Motion: Porteous/Da Cruz

 

THAT the meeting be extended for 15 minutes.

 

 

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Nil

 

C0818(1) Item 35       Notice of Motion: Gambling Harm Prevention and Reduction   Policy

Motion: (Kiat/Hesse)

 

THAT Council:

 

1.   Commits to preventing and reducing harm to our community from gambling and considers possible actions through its strategic and community planning processes, through community capacity building, long term advocacy for gambling industry reform, increased accountability and through the support of services for those who experience gambling related harm;

 

2.   Writes to local state MPs and the relevant minister and shadow minister, calling on the state government to develop mechanisms to accelerate the reduction in poker machine numbers in the state, and to place an immediate cap on poker machine licences in the Inner West LGA;

 

3.   Requests staff prepare a draft Gambling Harm Prevention and Reduction Policy to be reported for consideration by Council and the community. The focus of community consultation for this draft policy and report should be those harmed by gambling and their advocates, rather than those profiting from gambling;

 

 

4.   The report on the draft Policy should include consideration of practical steps Council can take to reduce gambling harm in the Inner West, including:

 

a.   The development of a Community Gambling Harm Reduction Standard, as a standard to be followed by clubs, hotels and other gambling venues.

 

b.   The employment of Gambling Harm Reduction Outreach Officer(s), to be funded by (voluntary) contributions from the pokies profits of hotels and clubs in the Inner West (noting that a contribution of just 1% of Inner West hotel and club pokies’ annual net profits is over $1,500,000).

 

5.   In accordance with the recommendations of the Alliance for Gambling Reform, the draft policy report to include consideration of at least the following further actions:

 

a.   Council to work towards ensuring there are no electronic gambling machines on premises located on public land;

 

b.   Council to work towards banning sponsorship by gambling and gambling related organisations for any Council event or on Council land;

 

c.   Council to work towards not hosting events at venues with poker machines;

 

d.   Council to make submissions in relation to all Local Impact Assessment applications by venues within the LGA, detailing harm as well as benefits to the community;

 

e.   Council to review its investments to consider divestment from any gambling or gambling related entities;

 

f.    Council to provide community information on gambling harm and services available to those affected by gambling;

 

g.   Council to review its involvement in the ClubGrants scheme, particularly in regard to the transparency of grant decisions, and evaluation of benefits of ClubGrants;

 

h.   Council to join the Alliance for Gambling Reform; and

 

i.    Council to ensure its internal policies recognise that staff may be impacted by gambling.

 

6.   Resolves to put the following proposal to the next Local Government NSW Conference:

 

a.   That LGNSW provide research and resources to support Councils in NSW developing and implementing gambling harm prevention strategies; and

 

b.   That LGNSW lobbies the state government on behalf of NSW Councils to implement the recommendations of the 2010 NSW Productivity Commission Report on Gambling and the 2014 NSW Upper House Select Committee Inquiry on the Impact of Gambling.

 

Motion Lost

For Motion:                 Crs Da Cruz, Hesse, Kiat, Lockie, Porteous, Stamolis and Steer

Against Motion:          Crs Byrne, Drury, Iskandar, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Raciti and York

 

Foreshadowed Motion: (Drury/McKenna OAM)

 

THAT Council convene an Inner West Gambling harm minimisation round table with representatives from the Alliance for Gambling Reform, experts in gambling harm minimisation, local clubs and pubs, other interested organisations and councillors. The aim of the round table would be to discuss making a local gambling compact with local strategies we as a community could agree on to reduce the problem gambling and assist those who experience this problem.

 

Motion Carried

For Motion:                 Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York

Against Motion:          Nil

 

Meeting closed at  11.31pm.

 

 

The following Items will be considered at the Extraordinary Council Meeting on 21 August 2018; Item 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 38, 29, 40 and 41.

 

 

 

 

Public Speakers:

 

 

Item #

 

Speaker                     

Suburb

Item 11:

Bruce Ashley

Jennifer Kent

Carla Cranny

Mary O’Sullivan

Jo Blackman

Dulwich Hill

Dulwich Hill

Dulwich Hill

Dulwich Hill

Dulwich Hill

Item 12:

Bryan Riley

Dione Fague

Keith Kerr

Annandale

Balmain

Annandale

Item 19:

Liza Schaeper

Annandale

Item 25:

Nipu Jayatilleke

Con O'Donnell

Lachlan Donald

Camperdown

Camperdown

Malabar

Item 27:

Toula Chrisafis

Summer Hill

Item 31:

Carolyn Allen

Balmain

Item 34:

Kate Cotis

Tamara Regan

St Peters

St Peters

Item 35:

Robert Cassano

Kate Da Costa

Ashfield

Alliance for Gambling Reform

Item 36:

Annabel Prince         

Jemma McGirr

Shae Phuong

Marrickville South

Petersham

Marrickville

Item 37:

Ramona Hewitt

Elizabeth Rosewall

Jennifer Allison

Dulwich Hill

Marrickville

Dulwich Hill

 

 

 

 

 

 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

Item No:         C0818(3) Item 1

Subject:         Supporting Anzac Day across the Inner West           

Prepared By:     Laura Stevens - Group Manager Communications, Engagement and Events  

Authorised By:  John Warburton - Deputy General Manager Community and Engagement

 

SUMMARY

The proposed approach outlined in this report provides an effective way for Council to support our community through both ANZAC Day and Remembrance Day events across the local government area.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT Council:

 

1.       Endorse the provision of support to Petersham and Ashfield RSLs for their ANZAC Day events, including fee waivers for venue hire, assistance with road closures and communications support; and

 

2.       Endorse the provision of support to Petersham and Ashfield RSLs for their Remembrance Day events, including fee waivers for venue hire and communications support.

 

 

 

 

BACKGROUND

At Council’s meeting on 22 May 2018, Council resolved to review other ANZAC Day events (in addition to the Balmain-Rozelle RSL Sub-Branch ANZAC Day ceremony in Loyalty Square, Balmain) held throughout the local government area, with staff to report back to Council about ways that Council could support these events.

 

Council also resolved to:

 

·    Allocate triennial funding of $15,000 per year for the ANZAC Day ceremony in Loyalty Square Balmain as part of the 2018-19 – 2020-21 budget, to be revised for the 2021-22 budget; and

·    Endorse a fee waiver for Petersham RSL for the hire of Petersham Town Hall for the Remembrance Day exhibition.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

Council’s Draft Grants and Fee Scale Policy outlines a scaled fee structure for hire of Council facilities, with a 100% fee subsidy available to not for profit organisations.

 

Under Council’s 2018/2019 Fees and Charges, not for profit organisations who do not charge their members for attending an event incur a reduced rate for use of Council facilities. RSLs are not for profit organisations, and Remembrance Day events and ANZAC Day are events which would not require participants to pay an entry fee.

 

A breakdown of the cost per event solely in terms of venue hire is outlined in the table below:

 

 

 

 

 

Event

Venue

Not for profit fee (excl. GST)

Financial impact

ANZAC Day service

Petersham Town Hall

Free before 5pm

 

ANZAC Day service

Ashfield Park

Not applicable – existing fee waiver

 

Remembrance Day service

Petersham Town Hall

$477.55

(6 hours Saturday, Sunday and public holidays)

$477.55 revenue foregone

 

The cost of providing communications and road closure support can be absorbed through Council’s ongoing staff and marketing costs.

 

OTHER STAFF COMMENTS

regarding their ANZAC Day services and potential support from Council in response to the ANZAC Day Notice of Motion.

 

Their requests for support from Council are outlined below and it is recommended that these requests are implemented by Council officials.

 

Petersham RSL – ANZAC Day Service

 

·    Fee waiver for venue hire of Petersham Town Hall

·    Mayor/Councillor invitations issued via the Mayor’s office, attendance welcomed

·    Communications support to promote the event through Council channels

 

Ashfield RSL – ANZAC Day Service

 

·    Fee waiver for hire of Ashfield Park in place from former Council

·    Council assistance with Police controlled road closures as required

·    Mayor/Councillor invitations issued via the Mayor’s office, attendance welcomed

·    Communications support to promote the event through Council channels

 

Both RSLs also raised their Remembrance Day services and requested the following support from Council.

 

Petersham RSL – Remembrance Day Service

 

·    Fee waiver for venue hire of Petersham Town Hall

·    Mayor/Councillor invitations issued via the Mayor’s office, attendance welcomed

·    Communications support to promote the event through Council channels

·    Fee waiver for venue hire of Petersham Town Hall for the Remembrance Day exhibition (already endorsed by Council at its 22 May meeting)

 

Ashfield RSL – Remembrance Day Service

 

·    Mayor/Councillor invitations issued via the Mayor’s office, attendance welcomed

·    Communications support to promote the event through Council channels

·    As the event is held on site at Ashfield RSL, no fee waiver for venue hire is required

 

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Nil.

 

CONCLUSION

Nil.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

Nil.


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

Item No:         C0818(3) Item 2

Subject:         Sponsorship policy           

Prepared By:     Laura Stevens - Group Manager Communications, Engagement and Events  

Authorised By:  John Warburton - Deputy General Manager Community and Engagement

 

SUMMARY

It is essential that Council has a policy in place informing Council officials of principles, guidelines, processes and issues relating to sponsorship, to ensure that all sponsorship arrangements are transparent, comply with Council’s Code of Conduct and other policies, and do not limit Council's ability to carry out its functions fully or impartially.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT the draft Sponsorship Policy be placed on public exhibition, with outcomes reported back to Council.

 

 

BACKGROUND

Prior to amalgamation on 12 May 2016, the former Ashfield, Leichhardt and Marrickville councils had sponsorship policies to support the appropriate provision and receipt of sponsorship by these councils.

 

This new Inner West Council sponsorship policy seeks to align these former policies, while also adding in additional provisions and processes to manage risk and ensure the policy adheres to the Independent Commission Against Corruption’s (ICAC) guide to Sponsorship in the public sector 2006.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

Inner West Council provides a wide range of services, activities and events to the community, some of which may be suitable for sponsorship in order to reduce the cost of these activities. Sponsorship may therefore assist Council in enhancing and expanding its services to the community at minimal cost to ratepayers.

 

OTHER STAFF COMMENTS

The policy covers the following areas:

 

·    Definition of sponsorship;

·    Principles for seeking and providing sponsorship;

·    Appropriate external sponsorship arrangements;

·    Restrictions;

·    Approvals for sponsorship;

·    Process for seeking external sponsorship;

·    Process for assessing external sponsorship;

·    Process for providing sponsorship;

·    Acknowledgement and benefits;

·    Reporting requirements: sponsorship proposals, agreements and register; and

·    Templates: sponsorship proposal, sponsorship agreement, approvals process checklist including conflict of interest declaration and statement of business ethics, and sponsorship register.

 

The policy ensures that not only can Council seek sponsorship from external organisations where appropriate, but also that Council can sponsor charity or community based organisations, activities and events external to Council that align with the organisation’s strategic objectives for a mutually beneficial outcome.

 

Importantly, clear restrictions are placed on the types of organisations that can provide or receive sponsorship, and every sponsorship proposal will be assessed against the possibility of a conflict of interest.

 

Staff are supported in their decision making and management of risk through clear processes and templates – including a two-step sign off process and mandated reporting requirements – for a consistent approach to sponsorship across Council.

 

To ensure transparency, Council will keep a register of all sponsorship agreements on the Reports and Registers page of its website, outlining sponsorship opportunities and agreements, the event or project which the sponsorship covers, the sponsor/organisation's details and contribution to or from Council.

 

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

It is proposed that the policy be placed on public exhibition for a period of four weeks given its impact on the community.

 

Internal engagement has already been undertaken to develop the policy, with input from Events, Community Services, Risk, the Leadership Team, the Internal Ombudsman, and Council staff previously responsible for managing sponsorship at the former Marrickville, Leichhardt and Ashfield councils.

 

CONCLUSION

Nil.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

Inner West Council Draft Sponsorship Policy

  


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

 

 

 

 Sponsorship policy

 


 

Summary

 

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­This policy informs Council officials – including Councillors, staff, contractors and volunteers – of principles, guidelines, processes and issues relating to sponsorship.

 

Policy background

 

Inner West Council provides a wide range of services, activities and events to the community, some of which may be suitable for sponsorship in order to enhance or reduce the cost of these activities.

 

This policy sets out principles and guidelines for both seeking and providing sponsorship of Inner West Council activities by individuals, organisations and corporations external to Council, including clubs and community groups. It also covers the provision of sponsorship by Council to external parties.

 

This policy is linked to Council’s Risk Management Framework.

 

Sponsorship can be mutually beneficial to both Council and the sponsor. Council's sponsorship arrangements should benefit the community, and assist Council in providing services and programs to its community.

However, Council must ensure that all sponsorship arrangements are transparent, comply with Council’s Code of Conduct and other policies, and do not limit Council's ability to carry out its functions fully or impartially.

This policy recognises that sponsorship may be beneficial in some cases and not in others. The benefits of sponsorship should be balanced against potential risks, including:

 

·    The perception that Council may expose itself to improper influence from private individuals, organisations or companies; and

·    Potential sponsors assuming that they have an entitlement to exercise influence over Council’s operations for their own advantage.

 

Policy purpose

 

The purpose of this policy is to:

 

· Inform Council officials of probity issues relating to sponsorship;

· Ensure sponsorship is sought, received and carried out ethically;

· Reduce the risk of corrupt conduct, or the appearance of corrupt conduct, in relation to sponsorship;

· Ensure a consistent and transparent approach is taken to sponsorship across the organisation; and

· Protect and enhance the reputation of Council.

 

Who this policy applies to

 

This sponsorship policy applies to Inner West Council officials and provides the steps they must follow when seeking to obtain or provide sponsorship.

 

Related legislation, policies and procedures

 

Related documents and policies:

 

·    Public Access to Information Policy;

·    Public Interest Disclosures Policy;

·    Independent Commission Against Corruption’s (ICAC) guide to Sponsorship in the public sector 2006;

·    Risk Management Framework; and

·    Council’s Code of Conduct.

Related legislation:

 

·    Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (GIPA Act);

·    Local Government Act 1993;

·    Independent Commission Against Corruption Act;

·    Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 NSW; and

·    State Records Act 1998.

 

Policy

 

1    Definition of sponsorship

 

Sponsorship is a commercial arrangement in which a sponsor provides a contribution of money or in kind support for an activity in return for certain specified benefits to the sponsor.

 

Sponsorship can be provided by the corporate sector, the public sector or private individuals.

 

For the purpose of this policy, sponsorship comprises:

 

·    Sponsorship of Inner West Council activities by individuals, organisations and companies external to Council, including clubs and community groups; and

·    Council sponsorship of organisations, activities and events external to Council.

   

Sponsorship does not include grants received by Council or donations made to Council; the selling of advertising space; joint ventures; consultancies; or unconditional gifts, donations, bequests or endowments.

 

2    Sponsorship principles

 

Consideration and assessment by Council of sponsorship proposals should have regard to the following principles, which have been informed by ICAC's guiding principles for sponsorship arrangements. 

 

These principles aim to ensure sponsorship is sought, received and carried out ethically, lawfully and transparently to reduce the risk of corrupt conduct, or the appearance of corrupt conduct.

 

Principles for seeking sponsorship

 

a) A sponsorship agreement will not impose or imply conditions that would limit, or appear to limit, Council’s ability to carry out its functions legally, fully and impartially.

b) Council (as a regulatory authority) will not seek or accept sponsorship from people or organisations whose involvement in a sponsorship arrangement could compromise or be

seen or perceived to compromise Council's ability to exercise its regulatory and planning functions.

 

c) Council will ensure that officials involved in the negotiation of the sponsorship have no

involvement in the regulation or inspection of the relevant party. All regulations and

inspections will be conducted in an open, fair, accountable and impartial manner.

 

d) Council will not seek or accept sponsorship from people or organisations who are, or are perceived to be, of a nature that is inconsistent with Council’s values or policies, may

adversely affect Council’s public image or reputation, or otherwise present a conflict of

interest.

 

e) In making a decision either to accept or not accept sponsorship, Council will weigh up the best interests of the public, public accountability, public perceptions and the potential risks against any potential benefits. Council’s Risk Management Framework provides a mechanism by which risks may be assessed and managed, through being captured and rated in a risk register, and identifying controls.

 

f)  It is preferable that there be compatibility between the sponsored activity and the sponsor, such as a sporting event being sponsored by an organisation related to sport.

 

g) Council officials are not permitted to derive a personal benefit from a sponsorship arrangement.

 

h) Council will advertise and promote sponsorship opportunities in a way that does not confer or imply an unfair advantage to some potential sponsors.

 

i) Sponsorships are only to be pursued if the time and resources used to obtain it do not exceed the value of the sponsorship.

 

j) Sponsorship benefits for the sponsor must not outweigh the benefits to Council, and the level of recognition and benefits available to sponsors must be commensurate to the scale of the sponsorship.

 

k) Where sponsorship involves the provision of a sponsor's product, Council will evaluate the product for its fitness for the stated purpose against relevant and objective operational criteria through a risk assessment process. Council should not support exclusive use of the sponsors' product.

 

l) All sponsorship arrangements entered into by Council must be formalised in a written

agreement. A template is provided in Attachment One of this policy.

 

m) All sponsorship arrangements must be approved in writing by the relevant Coordinator, Manager, Group Manager, General Manager and/or Council, as set out in this policy. There is a two person approvals process to foster transparency. An outlined approvals process is provided as an attachment to this policy.

 

n) Each sponsorship proposal will be assessed on an individual basis and no ongoing sponsorship beyond the terms set out in the arrangement should be implied or assumed.

 

 

 

Principles for the provision of sponsorship by Council

a) There must be no real or apparent conflict between the objectives and mission of the sponsorship recipient and Council.

 

b) The opportunity for provision of sponsorship by Council should be made as widely known as possible, with any costs of advertising or promoting sponsorship to be balanced against the potential benefits.

 

c) Council officials are not permitted to derive a personal benefit from a sponsorship arrangement.

 

d) The level of recognition and benefits available to Council as a sponsor must be commensurate to the scale of the sponsorship.

 

e) Council officials must be made aware of all other sponsors involved in the project to ensure they align with Council’s involvement and objectives. The relevant Council official will seek a list of sponsors prior to formalising any sponsorship agreement.

 

f) All sponsorship arrangements entered into by Council must be formalised in a written

agreement. A template is provided in Attachment One of this policy.

 

g) Council officials must monitor sponsorship arrangements to ensure the promised sponsor benefits are delivered. Sufficient and timely information must be provided by the sponsored organisation to enable Council to evaluate the sponsorship.

 

h) Each sponsorship proposal will be assessed on an individual basis and no ongoing sponsorship beyond the terms set out in the arrangement should be implied or assumed.

 

3    Appropriate external sponsorship arrangements

Council will generally only accept sponsorship for short term activities or programs such as:

·    Events and festivals;

·    Community development and cultural activities and programs of a limited time period;

·    Public conferences, seminars and workshops;

·    Community or industry awards;

·    Environmental projects;

·    Community awareness campaigns; and

·    Education or recreation programs.

The following types of activities are generally not suitable to receive sponsorship:

·    Ongoing services and activities of Council, whether undertaken by Council officers, volunteers, committees or other groups;

·    Buildings, facilities, parks or other assets; and

·    Regular publications such as newsletters.

The following types of sponsorship are considered acceptable:

 

·    Provision of funding;

·    Provision of goods, services or vouchers (in kind support); and/or

·    Provision of discounts.

 

4    Restrictions

Council will not accept sponsorship from organisations or related parties that are:

 

·    Involved in any current planning, regulatory or legal matter involving Council, or if it is

reasonably known that such matters are likely to arise in the foreseeable future (e.g. developers with a Development Application before Council);

·    Involved in political fields (e.g. political parties);

·    Involved in or associated with products or services related to tobacco, pornography or firearms;

·    Involved in commercial alcohol products or services, unless the business is based in Council’s Local Government Area and can demonstrate a considerable contribution to the community; and/or

·    Otherwise perceived to be of a nature that is inconsistent with Council’s values and

policies or may adversely affect Council’s public image or reputation.

 

Every sponsorship proposal will be assessed against the possibility of a conflict of interest

and, in particular, may be refused or terminated in any case where, during the life of the

sponsorship, the sponsor or related party:

 

·    Has a current development application or planning matter before Council, or Council is aware of the possibility of an application or matter coming before the Council in the near future;

·    Is, or is likely to be, subject to regulation or inspection by the Council which may

impose conditions; or

·    Where the sponsorship may limit Council’s ability to carry out its

functions fully and impartially or may be perceived to do so.

 

Related parties may include, but are not limited to, management, board or committee members of organisations.

 

5    Approvals for sponsorship

The below approval amounts relate to the financial delegations Council has in place.

 

Sponsorship requiring Group Manager approval

 

Sponsorships where the value of funding or in kind support to/from Council is up to $150,000, and is for a sponsorship period of one month or less, may be approved by the relevant Group Manager.

 

Sponsorship requiring Deputy General Manager approval

 

Sponsorships where the value of funding or in kind support to/from Council is between $150,000 and $250,000, and is for a sponsorship period of one month or less, may be approved by the relevant Deputy General Manager.

 

Sponsorship requiring General Manager approval

 

Sponsorships where the value of funding or in kind support to/from Council is more than $250,000, and is for a sponsorship period of one month or less, may be approved by the General Manager.

 

 

Sponsorship requiring Council approval

 

Sponsorships for a period of one month or more must be approved by Council. Council must also approve any sponsorship proposals involving naming rights.

 

Sign off process

A two person sign off process is required, whereby the relevant Council official will make a recommendation and the appropriate Group Manager, Deputy General Manager, General Manager or Council will approve. The responsible Council official/s should make the authoriser aware of any potential issues when seeking authorisation, referring to the principles outlined in Section 2 of this policy. A template is provided in Attachment One of this policy.

6    Process for seeking external sponsorship

Inner West Council may seek financial and/or in kind sponsorship from organisations, companies or individuals to support specific projects or events. 

 

Sponsorship opportunities should be promoted widely and not limited to invited sponsors.  However, it is recognised that it may not always be reasonable or practical to expect extensive processes to be undertaken for lower value sponsorships, or if the potential pool of sponsors is small or specialised. If wide promotion is not undertaken, the reasons for this should be clearly documented and approved by the relevant Group Manager prior to promotion.

 

Individual sponsorship opportunities shall be promoted in a way commensurate to the scope and value of the sponsorship. 

 

For sponsorships where the value of funding or in kind support to Council is $10,000 or less, it should be noted that advertising is preferable but Council may seek or accept sponsorship by dealing directly with potential sponsors should the alternative not be cost effective. Council’s sponsorship register may be referred to in the process of identifying potential sponsors.

 

Sponsorships for amounts between $10,000 and $20,000 must be sought via advertising in the public domain.

 

Sponsorships for amounts greater than $20,000 must be sought via an advertised or tender process.

 

Any requests from organisations or individuals seeking sponsorship made directly to Councillors should be directed to the relevant Council official.

 

7    Process for assessing external sponsorship

Existing sponsorship relationships or ongoing sponsorship support that was already in place prior to the development of this policy should be reviewed annually by at least two people for transparency purposes: the relevant Group Manager and Deputy General Manager.

 

Sponsorship proposals must be assessed against the below predetermined and publicly available criteria:

 

·    The sponsoring organisation must be compatible with Council's values and strategic objectives;

·    The sponsoring organisation must agree to the sponsorship benefits offered;

·    The sponsoring organisation must not be involved in conflict or conflict of interest with Council;

·    The sponsoring organisation must be seen to have the capacity to fulfil its sponsorship obligations;

·    The sponsorship arrangement must benefit both parties; and

·    The sponsorship agreement must adhere to Council's sponsorship policy.

 

A sponsorship proposal template is included as an attachment to this policy.

Council must ensure that sufficient resources are available to enable the promised sponsor benefits to be delivered. Sufficient and timely information must also be provided to the sponsor to enable them to evaluate the sponsorship.

8    Process for providing sponsorship

Council also has the facility to sponsor other organisations and/or their associated activities either financially and/or in kind, including, but not limited to:

·    Events;

·    Environmental projects;

·    Community development and cultural programs and activities;

·    Publications; and

·    Fundraisers (e.g. raffles and auctions).

Sponsorship proposals received by Council must be assessed against Council's strategic objectives and Council's policies. Council's sponsorship of the project must align with Council's objectives as set out in the Community Strategic Plan and Delivery Program.

Sponsorship proposals must be assessed against the below predetermined and publicly available criteria:

 

·    The organisation seeking sponsorship must be a charity or community based;

·    The organisation seeking sponsorship must be compatible with Council's values;

·    The project or activity being sponsored must have local impact in the Inner West local government area; 

·    The organisation seeking sponsorship must offer tangible benefits to Council in return for sponsorship;

·    The organisation seeking sponsorship must not be actively involved in conflict or conflict of interest with Council;

·    The organisation seeking sponsorship must be seen to have the capacity to fulfil its sponsorship obligations;

·    The sponsorship arrangement must benefit both parties; and

·    The sponsorship agreement must adhere to Council's sponsorship policy.

 

A sponsorship proposal template is provided in Attachment One of this policy.

 

9    Acknowledgement and benefits

Acknowledgement and sponsorship benefits should be commensurate with the sponsorship contribution made and the scope of the event, activity or project. For example, a sponsorship arrangement valued at $500 may entitle the sponsorship organisation to recognition on a promotional flyer, whereas a sponsorship arrangement valued at $5,000 may entitle the sponsorship organisation to have their logo included on all promotional material, advertising and signage.

The following benefits are considered acceptable, subject to a written agreement:

 

·    Use of event facilities which may include hospitality, preferential seats, opportunity to speak or participate at an event; and

·    Display or merchandising of goods or other material.

 

The following forms of recognition/acknowledgment are considered acceptable, subject to a written agreement:

 

·    Inclusion of sponsor’s branding/name/logo on collateral such as signage, banners, posters, brochures, advertisements and website;

·    Defined, limited use of Council’s branding/name/logo by the sponsor, subject to approval by a Council official as part of the sponsorship agreement;

·    Media or promotional opportunities, such as acknowledgement in Council media releases relating to the event or project;

·    Verbal acknowledgement at an event or activity by master of ceremonies or other speakers;

·    Formal letter from Council acknowledging the sponsor's valuable contribution; and

·    Naming rights in exceptional circumstances and if approved by Council.

As with all signage and other communications and marketing material, approval must be sought from the Communications team where appropriate.

10  Reporting requirements: sponsorship proposals, agreements and register

All sponsorship arrangements need to be appropriately documented, through sponsorship proposals, sponsorship agreements and a sponsorship register.

Sponsorship proposal

The sponsorship proposal must outline:

·    Type of event or project;

·    Target audience;

·    Promotion which will be undertaken;

·    Potential benefits to sponsors and alignment to Council’s strategic objectives through the Community Strategic Plan and/or Delivery Plan;

·    An outline of the general benefits of sponsorship, including promotion

·    Expected sponsorship contribution and the form in which this will take (cash or in-kind), including explanation of GST and its implication for sponsorship;

·    Conditions of sponsorship;

·    Period/timeframe of sponsorship; and

·    Payment strategy.

 

Sponsorship agreement

A sponsorship agreement must be documented in a signed written contract confirming the benefits for both parties. The form this takes will depend on the value of and complexity of the sponsorship arrangement. A template is provided is Attachment One of this policy.

For sponsorships with a value of more than $5,000, arrangements will be documented in a formal written agreement.

For sponsorships with a value of $5,000 or less, the agreement may be by an exchange of letters or written agreement.

All sponsorships must be monitored by the relevant Council official throughout the term of the sponsorship to ensure that the expectations of Council and the sponsor are met. If the conditions of the sponsorship agreement are not met, it may be terminated as per Section 4 of this policy. Sponsors should be given timely and appropriate information in writing on the results of the event or project in order to evaluate their association with Council.

Sponsorship register

Council will keep a register of all sponsorship agreements on the Reports and Registers page of its website, outlining sponsorship opportunities and agreements, the event or project which the sponsorship covers, the sponsor/organisation's details and contribution to or from Council. It is the responsibility of Council officials to keep this up to date as required.

Information about the full nature and extent of sponsorship agreements may be made available to the public upon request.

11   Breaches of this policy

Breaches of this policy may result in disciplinary action and/or revocation of the sponsorship. If a crime is alleged it will be referred to the police, and if corruption is alleged it will be referred to ICAC.

12   Policy review

 

This policy will be reviewed regularly as required and may change at any time, subject to a Council resolution.

 

ATTACHMENT ONE

 

Sponsorship templates:

 

a)   Sponsorship proposal

b)   Sponsorship agreement

c)   Approvals process checklist including conflict of interest declaration and statement of business ethics

d)   Sponsorship register

 

 

 

 

 

A.  Sponsorship proposal

 

 

[recipient name and address]

 

 

[date]

 

 

 

Dear [name],

 

I write regarding any interest [business/organisation name] may have in supporting Inner West Council’s [event/program/activity] on [date].

 

[Provide details of Inner West Council event/program/activity including target audience.]

 

E.g.

 

Introduction to Inner West Council’s Major Events Program

 

The Inner West local government area is distinctive.  It is known for its colour, character and community, all of which are showcased in a comprehensive calendar of community events each year. Every year, Inner West Council presents a variety of community focused festivals and events that feature a wide variety of cultures, performers, artists and businesses from the area and surrounds.

Council's event program is recognised as one of the most comprehensive and effective cultural animation programs in Sydney, serving to foster and promote the Inner West's unique cultural identity while providing important opportunities for belonging and celebration.

 

Inner West Council is proud to present a series of major events each financial year for local business sponsorship consideration.

 

Sponsorship proposal

 

This proposal for the [event/program/activity] contains:

 

·   An outline of the benefits of sponsorship, including promotion

·   Expected sponsorship contribution and the form in which this will take (cash or in-kind), including explanation of GST and its implication for sponsorship;

·   Conditions of sponsorship;

·   Period/timeframe of sponsorship; and

·   Payment strategy.

 

 

 

Benefits of sponsorship

E.g.

 

Sponsoring a community event is not only a financial decision, but an opportunity to enhance your business reputation by:

·  Raising your business profile at a lesser cost than own advertising

·  Increasing awareness of your brand among a diverse range of event attendees

·  Establishing goodwill within the community by being identified as a good corporate citizen

·  Engage with existing customers and potential new customers through direct access to thousands of participants at every event

·  Building trust in your brand beyond advertising and traditional marketing

·  Differentiating your company from competitors

·  Providing an opportunity to present or demonstrate your products and/ or services at the event

Sponsorship features and value comparisons

 

[Sponsorship values and associated benefits are listed here, with any required caveats]

 

E.g.

 

Event

Principal Sponsor

Major Sponsor

 

Sponsor

Supporter

Dulwich Hill Village Fair

$5,000

ex GST

$3,000 ex

GST

$2,000 ex GST

$1,000

ex GST

 

Benefit

Sponsor

Supporter

Company logo on all promotional material – 10,000 flyers,

300 posters

 

a

a

Business name acknowledgement on any other promotional material (excluding above)

 

a

a

Acknowledgement in radio advertising (where possible)

a

 

Acknowledgement in all media releases

a

a

Logo on Council website with link

a

a

Business name acknowledgement/link on Council website

 

a

 

Logo acknowledgement on social network pages

a

a

Business name acknowledgement on social network pages

 

 

Opportunity to work with the Events team on

innovative ideas to maximise business exposure

a

a

Covered 6m x 3m marquee or equivalent space

a

 

Covered 2.4m x 2.4m fete stall or equivalent space

 

a

Banner placement on Main Stage or Kids’ Play Park*

a

a

Branded shade cover in the Kids’ Play Park

a

 

Acknowledgement at the Official Welcome

a

a

Scripted acknowledgements on stage by MC

a

a

Mentions of support by MC

 

 

Logo acknowledgement on program display boards

a

a

Name acknowledgement on program display boards

 

 

Official Certificate of Appreciation

a

 

Thanks and acknowledgement on social network pages

a

a

Acknowledgement in Council newsletter **

a

a

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

              * Number of banners and positioning is dependent on number of stages and level of sponsorship

** May occur either pre or post event dependant on newsletter deadlines

Suggested support from your organisation

 

E.g.

 

Understanding the [organisation] already supports other valuable projects within the community, we would suggest the following support:

 

Principal Sponsor – $5000.00 excl. GST or Major Sponsor – $3000.00 excl. GST

 

This sponsorship will assist us in covering the costs associated with providing a main stage entertainment program reflective of the cultural diversity of the area or the program in the Kids Play Park which includes an entertainment program, jumping castle, outdoor games and face painting within the Dulwich Hill Village Fair precinct.

 

Conditions of sponsorship

 

[List relevant conditions here]

 

Timeframe

 

[List timeframe here]

 

Payment details

 

[List payment details here]

 

Please don’t hesitate to contact me should you require any further information.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

[Council official name, title and contact details]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B.  Sponsorship agreement

 

 

[document reference number]

 

[recipient name and address]

 

[date]

 

 

Dear [name],

[event/program/activity name]

Thank you for agreeing to be a Sponsor for the [event/program/activity]. Inner West Council values the ongoing relationship with local businesses and community organisations and we are delighted to have the support of [business/organisation name] for this [event/program/activity].

As the Sponsor, Inner West Council offers [business/organisation name] the following sponsorship benefits:

E.g.

·    Company logo on all promotional material including

Flyers promoting [event/program/activity] (quantity of 10,000)

Posters promoting [event/program/activity] (quantity of 300)

·    Business name on Inner West Council website (link to program);

·    Acknowledgement on media releases

·    Company logo acknowledged as sponsor on [event/program/activity] promotional material;

·    One, 2.4m x 2.4m fete stall or equivalent space for your promotional use with the opportunity to distribute promotional material;

·    Scripted acknowledgements by MCs on all entertainment stages throughout the event;

·    Logo acknowledgment on the Festival’s program display boards listing running orders on the day;

·    Acknowledgment at the Official Welcome;

·    Business name acknowledgement and thank you on Council’s digital and social media, including Facebook and e-newsletters; and

·    Opportunity to work with Council to develop innovative ideas to maximise business exposure.

 

In return for these benefits, [business/organisation name] agrees to provide cash sponsorship of $[amount] + GST.

Please sign a copy of this letter signalling your agreement, and return at your convenience.

Once again, thank you for your support of the [event/program/activity].

Should you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me on [phone/email].

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

.......................................................

 

[Council official name and title]

 

 

Signed in agreement:

__________________________                                            ____________________

[recipient name]                                                          Date

on behalf of [business/organisation name]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C. Approvals process checklist including conflict of interest declaration and statement of business ethics

 

Compatible with Council's values and strategic objectives

Sponsor agrees to benefits offered

Sponsor or related parties not involved in conflict or conflict of interest with Council

Sponsor or related parties do not have current or proposed planning, regulatory or legal matter (including development applications) before Council

Sponsor not involved in political fields

Sponsor not involved in or associated with products or services related to tobacco, pornography or firearms

Sponsor not involved in commercial alcohol products or services, unless the business is based in Council’s Local Government Area and makes a considerable contribution to the community

Sponsor has capacity to fulfil its sponsorship obligations

Sponsorship arrangement benefits both parties

Sponsorship agreement adheres to Council’s sponsorship policy

List of other sponsors provided

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATION

(Insert name) and the company I represent (Company name) and the company’s directors, shareholders, officers and employees:

1.         Have not offered, or given and will not offer or give, any financial reward or other inducement of any kind to any Council officers and/or Councillors, with respect to any of my dealings in relation to this Sponsorship.

2.         Are not in any way connected with and do not have any actual or potential conflict of interest with any Council staff member or Councillor (whether employed on a permanent, casual or contractual basis).

3. Have not fixed or adjusted the amount of the Sponsorship by or under or in accordance with any agreement or arrangement with any other person. 

4.         I have read and understand the concept of conflict of interest and collusive Sponsorship as set out on the following page of this form.

I understand and accept that the Council reserves the right to terminate any contract, transaction or agreement that Council may enter into with me or the above mentioned company as a result of this Sponsorship, should it subsequently be shown that I have failed to disclose herein any matter or contravene any statement relevant to this declaration. I also accept Inner West Council’s right to reject any future Sponsorships from the above mentioned company, or me if I am shown to have made any false declaration herein or otherwise.

 

    

 

 

    

(name of person making declaration)

 

(name of witness)

 

    

 

 

    

(signature)

 

(signature of witness)

 

    

 

 

    

(date)

 

(date)

STatement of Business Ethics

Council’s Statement of Business Ethics provides an outline of the ethical framework within which Council operates. It reinforces Council’s values for conducting business as well as stating what Council expects from its business partners.

As a prospective business partner, it is a requirement that you have reviewed Council’s statement of business ethics and understand the need to abide by it when conducting business with, or on behalf of, Council.

DECLARATION

I…………………………………………...of……………………………………………………………

(name and position of person making declaration)    (name of firm, company, partnership, corporation, association, or other organisation or entity)

have reviewed Council’s Statement of Business Ethics and declare that

………………………………………………………………………………….………………………

(name of firm, company, partnership, corporation, association, or other organisation or entity)

and any parent, subsidiary or franchisee of

………………………………………………………………………………….………………………

(name of firm, company, partnership, corporation, association, or other organisation or entity)

agree to abide by the principles contained therein.

 

Sponsor organisation:

 

 

 

Name of signatory:

 

 

 

Position:

 

 

 

Signature:

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

 

D. Sponsorship register

 

Sponsorship opportunities

 

Event/program/activity

Type of sponsorship

Value

Closing date

Contact

E.g. Marrickville Festival

E.g. Funding, in kind support

E.g. $5,000

E.g. 30 June 2018

E.g. Relevant Council official email address/phone number

 

Sponsorship agreements – external sponsorship

 

Event/program/activity

Type of sponsorship

Value

Date of agreement

E.g. Marrickville Festival

E.g. Funding, in kind support

E.g. $5,000

E.g. 1-21 October 2018

 

Sponsorship agreements – provision of sponsorship

 

Organisation

                     

Type of sponsorship

Value

Date of agreement

E.g. Newtown Neighbourhood Centre

E.g. In kind support – aquatic centre membership for raffle

E.g. $500

E.g. 30 June 2018

 

* The above will be listed on the Reports and Registers page of Council’s website


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

Item No:         C0818(3) Item 3

Subject:         Media and social media policies for Councillors           

Prepared By:     Laura Stevens - Group Manager Communications, Engagement and Events  

Authorised By:  John Warburton - Deputy General Manager Community and Engagement

 

SUMMARY

In addition to policies for staff, Council should have media and social media policies for Councillors relating to media liaison and social media use. These establish clear protocols and guidelines for Councillor communication to the media and with the community, while enabling Councillors to speak to the media, engage with the community online and express their opinions in an individual capacity.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT Council:

 

1.       Adopt the Media Policy for Councillors; and

2.       Adopt the Social Media policy for Councillors.

 

 

 

 

BACKGROUND

At its meeting on 13 March 2018, Council resolved to adopt media and social media policies for Council staff, deferring consideration of the Councillor related aspects of the policies to a workshop.

 

New media and social media policies for Councillors were drafted, addressing the key issues outlined at the 13 March Council meeting:

a)         Councillors and Mayor are elected representatives and as such are required to represent their constituents and communicate with them;

b)         Any media/social media policy will need different policies for staff than for the                   Councillors/Mayor. Volunteers should have also have different media protocol;

c)         Any media/social media policy needs to adhere to freedom of political communications which are recognised under the Australian Constitution. These freedoms mean Councillors must be free to speak to the community through all communication channels including traditional and social media. They also mean Councillors have a right to express their own opinions on any decision of Council and to talk freely to the media and constituents;

d)         Debate both inside and outside the Council chambers is how democracy works. The media/social media policies need to encourage that debate and engagement       in local democracy in the media and social media not unintentionally shut it down;

e)         The Model Code of Conduct and newly adopted Code of Meeting Practice sit alongside the media/social media policies they should not sit within the media/social media policies. Councillors are aware or should make themselves aware of their obligations under the Code of Conduct and Code of Meeting Practice and adhere to them as required; and

f)          Council’s communication policies need to be focused on developing a rich, respectful democratic environment both inside and outside the Council chambers which presents different points of view and encourages dialogue, debate and engagement of the community with Council.

 

On 19 June 2018, Councillors were presented with the updated Councillor policies at a Councillor briefing session, in which they were given the opportunity to ask questions and provide further feedback. This input was then incorporated into the policies.

 

On 22 June 2018, the final proposed policies were emailed to Councillors for their reference prior to being considered at a Council meeting.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

Nil.

 

OTHER STAFF COMMENTS

Nil.

 

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Nil.

 

The updated policies have been reviewed by the Internal Ombudsman.

 

CONCLUSION

Nil.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

Social media policy for Councillors

2.

Media policy for Councillors

  


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

 

 

 

 Social media policy for Councillors

 


 

 

Summary

 

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­This policy informs Councillors of processes, guidelines and issues relating to the use of social media.

 

Policy background

 

 

Inner West Council recognises that social media is an essential communication, engagement and customer service channel.

 

This policy acknowledges that Councillors are elected representatives and as such are required to represent and communicate with their community as part of a robust local democracy, including through public debate and engaging with their constituents online.

 

Social media provides a platform to encourage dialogue between Councillors and the community, and enable Councillors to gain insight into the community and its needs via public feedback.

 

However, clear and consistent guidelines are required to ensure the appropriate use of social media by Councillors. This policy enables Councillors to speak on social media while protecting the interests of Council and complying with the Code of Conduct.

 

It is consistent with existing policies, such as the Code of Conduct, media policy and policies on the acceptable use of information technology. Council’s Code of Conduct states that Council officials, including Councillors, must not conduct themselves in a manner that is likely to bring Council or holders of civic office into disrepute and this applies to the use of social media. 

 

Policy purpose

 

The purpose of this policy is to: 

 

·    Guide Councillors on the use of social media sites;

·    Protect the reputation of Inner West Council; and

·    Provide an effective platform for community engagement and public debate.

 

Who this policy applies to

 

The policy applies to Inner West Councillors and informs them of their responsibilities in relation to the use of social media in an official or individual capacity which reflects on their position as a Council official.

 

Related legislation, policies and procedures

 

Related policies:

 

·    Media Policy for Staff;

·    Media Policy for Councillors;

·    Social Media Policy for Staff;

·    Inner West Council Crisis Communications Guidelines;

·    Public Interest Disclosures Policy;

·    Model Code of Conduct;

·    Procedures for the Administration of the Code of Conduct;

·    Code of Meeting Practice; and

·    Community Engagement Framework.

Related legislation:

 

·    Local Government Act 1993 NSW;

·    Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 NSW;

·    The Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 NSW;

·    Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 NSW;

·    Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 NSW;

·    Work Health and Safety Act 2011 NSW;

·    Model Code of Conduct for Local Councils in NSW 2015;

·    Australian Constitution;

·    Copyright Act 1968 Cth; and

·    Copyright Amendment (Digital Agenda) Act 2000 Cth.

 

Policy

 

1          Definition of social media 

 

Social media facilitates the creation and sharing of information and ideas via virtual communities and online networks. It invites communication, collaboration, discussion and debate. It also enables the development of social and professional networks, groups, followers and contacts.

 

This policy relates and applies to social media platforms, including but not limited to:  

 

·    Facebook;

·    Twitter; 

·    Instagram;

·    Your Say Inner West; 

·    YouTube; 

·    LinkedIn; 

·    Google+;

·    Snapchat;

·    Council’s Intranet;

·    Blogs; and

·    Video podcasts.

 

Council’s official social media platforms are administered by Council’s Communications team to ensure consistency of content, tone and style.

 

2          Roles and responsibilities of Councillors  

 

Councillors should be aware that any social media activity or interaction, either official or personal, is public, permanently available, traceable and able to be reproduced elsewhere. 

 

Councillors should also be aware that whether they intend it or not, what they post online in a private capacity may reflect on Inner West Council and their role as a Councillor, and they should therefore behave in a way that upholds the values and reputation of Council, consistent with the Code of Conduct and other policies.

 

Councillors are reminded that ‘shares’, ‘likes’ or ‘retweets’ may be viewed as an endorsement of the original post.

 

In the spirit of a respectful democratic environment, constructive criticism or negative comments/commenters should not be blocked or removed, unless they are overtly offensive and defamatory, incite hatred and violence or are criminal in nature.

 

Councillors must also be aware of posts by others to their social media pages and consider if the post and its comment/s are offensive or may incite hatred, violence and/or criminal acts. Any post/comments made to a Councillor’s social media page/site should be monitored by the Councillor to ensure that it meets the standard of socially acceptable behaviour/commentary. Councillors should remove any post/comment that does not meet the required standard of this policy.

 

3          Councillor use of social media

 

Councillors are responsible for the preparation, posting and management of their own content on their social media channels. Councillors can make personal comments on their social media platforms, but must make clear that any views are their own opinions as an individual and not those of Council.

The following examples relate to, but are not limited to, what a Councillor must not do:

·    Speak on Council’s behalf;

·    Commit Council to any action, pre-empt official Council announcements or post any confidential Council information;

·    Direct staff to post content, in line with the Code of Conduct;

·    Breach the privacy of other Council officials or those that deal with Council;

·    Post content that is offensive, humiliating, threatening or intimidating to other Council officials or those that deal with Council; or

·    Post content about Council that may be misleading or deceptive.

Councillors must also ensure that their use of social media, and Council’s computer resources or other mobile devices, is consistent with the Code of Conduct.

The Mayor can issue material in line with official media releases issued on mayoral letterhead on his/her separate mayoral social media platforms. The Mayor should also approve any posts by Council officials on official Council social media channels using his/her image and/or quotes.

 

4          Guidelines for Councillors using social media

 

The following are examples of, but are not limited to, what Councillors should and should not do on social media.

 

 

Do …

 

·    Follow Council’s social media channels to stay in touch with what’s happening, and to like and share Council’s posts.

·    Remember everything you say and do is public, and you can be identified as a Councillor of Inner West Council.

·    Pause before you post – would you be comfortable with this information being shared with your family, friends, work colleagues, media and the broader community, and is the information likely to bring you or Council into disrepute?

·    Be mindful of your general conduct obligations under the Code of Conduct, including the requirement not to damage Council’s reputation.

·    Be careful to communicate accurate information.

·    Be courteous and respectful of fellow Councillors, other Council staff and members of the community, including respecting people’s privacy.

·    Report any violations of this policy to the General Manager and/or the Internal Ombudsman.

Don’t …

 

·    Imply that you are speaking on behalf of Inner West Council.

·    Disclose official, personal or confidential information that is not publicly available (such as staff, personal information, legal advice, commercial-in-confidence and Code of Conduct complaints).

·    Post material that is obscene, pornographic, defamatory, threatening, harassing or discriminatory to any individual, group or organisation or may lead to criminal penalty.

 

5          Emergencies 

 

In the event of an emergency, publishing Council information on social media sites will be the responsibility of the Communications team with approval from the General Manager or their delegate.  

 

6          Breaches of this policy

 

Breaches of this policy by Councillors may result in an investigation of the alleged breach in line with Council’s complaint handling policy, the Local Government Guidelines on Investigations and the Code of Conduct.

 

Any alleged criminal offence or allegation of corrupt conduct will be referred to the relevant external agency.

 

Inappropriate behaviours may include, but are not limited to: 

 

·    Using social media to ridicule, vilify, harass, cyberbully, discriminate against or bring into disrepute the Council, or other Council officials, including Councillors or community members;

·    Posting content that is deemed to be offensive, including obscene or sexually explicit language; and

·    Using social media channels to post/provide confidential, personal or sensitive information relating to Council.

 

 

 

7          Privacy 

 

There is no such thing as a ‘private’ social media site. Posting information online is a public activity and no different from publishing information in a newspaper. Councillors are advised to not post anything to social media sites that they would not be comfortable with if quoted in the media.

 

Everything posted or received on social media is public property. Once something is published online, control of it is lost forever and it cannot be withdrawn. Search engines can find posts years after publication, while archival systems save or cache information even if deleted.

 

Posts – even deleted posts – are considered ‘publication’, and are subject to the same defamation laws as any other media. 

 

Councillors are responsible for any information they release relating to Council, Councillors or other Council officials. Claiming that comments/images are published on private pages is not defensible.  

 

8          Policy review 

 

This policy will be reviewed regularly as required and may change at any time, subject to a Council resolution.

 

 

 

 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

 

 

 

 Media policy for Councillors

 


 

Summary

 

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­This policy informs Councillors of processes, guidelines and issues relating to media relations to ensure they are aware of their obligations regarding media liaison.

 

Policy background

 

Inner West Council strives to maintain a positive image in the community. Our public image is influenced by the way we communicate and media relations should support Council in achieving our strategic objectives.

 

A mutually beneficial and trusting relationship between Council and the media is essential in maintaining and protecting Council’s reputation. Inner West Council welcomes enquiries from the media, and works proactively with media outlets to inform the public about Council’s activities and advocacy.

 

This policy recognises that Councillors are elected representatives and as such are required to represent and communicate with their constituents as part of a robust local democracy, including through public debate and engaging with the media.

 

Councillors should ensure they are aware of and comply with their obligations under the Code of Conduct and Code of Meeting Practice.

 

Policy purpose

 

The purpose of this policy is to:

 

·    Establish consistent protocols and guidelines for Councillor communication to the media;

·    Clearly indicate Council’s authorised spokespeople;

·    Protect and enhance the reputation of Council;

·    Maintain and maximise positive relations with media; and

·    Minimise miscommunication and potential adverse consequences.

Who this policy applies to

 

This policy applies to Inner West Council Councillors in relation to communications with the media.

 

Related legislation, policies and procedures

 

Related policies:

 

·    Social Media Policy for Staff;

·    Social Media Policy for Councillors;

·    Media Policy for Staff;

·    Inner West Council Crisis Communications Guidelines;

·    Public Access to Information Policy;

·    Community Engagement Framework;

·    Code of Meeting Practice;

·    Public Interest Disclosures Policy;

·    Local Government Guidelines on Investigations;

·    Code of Conduct; and

·    Procedures for the Administration of Code of Conduct.

Related legislation:

 

·    Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (GIPA Act);

·    Local Government Act 1993;

·    Independent Commission Against Corruption Act;

·    Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 NSW;

·    Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 2009 NSW;

·    State Records Act 1998;

·    Workplace Health and Safety Act 2011;

·    Model Code of Conduct for Local Councils in NSW 2015;

·    Australian Constitution;

·    Copyright Act 1968 Cth; and

·    Copyright Amendment (Digital Agenda) Act 2000 Cth.

 

Policy

 

1    Definition of media

 

For the purpose of this policy, media comprises all print, broadcast and online media.

 

2    Council's authorised spokespeople

 

Comments to the media on behalf of Council should only be made through authorised spokespeople. In the first instance, the Mayor and General Manager are Council’s official spokespeople on all matters.

 

At their discretion, the Mayor and General Manager can nominate other Council officials to act as a Council spokesperson.

 

3    Media comment and responding to media enquiries on behalf of Council

 

All operational media enquiries relating to Council are to be referred to the Media and Communications Coordinator in the Communications team. The Media and Communications Coordinator is responsible for the coordination of responses to all operational enquiries, and will inform and liaise with the General Manager, the Mayor’s unit and relevant Council staff as required.

All mayoral media enquiries are to be referred to the mayoral media unit (Mayoral Media and Communications Coordinator or Mayoral Policy and Media Relations Manager) in the first instance, or the Media and Communications Coordinator if the mayoral media unit is unavailable. The Mayoral Media and Communications Coordinator is responsible for the coordination of responses to all mayoral enquiries, and will inform and liaise with the General Manager, the Communications team and relevant Council staff as required.

 

All media inquiries regarding the Internal Ombudsman Shared Service are to be directed to and addressed by the Internal Ombudsman.

4    Media comment by Councillors

 

Individual Councillors may speak to the media and express their opinions, but may not speak on behalf of Council or comment on any confidential matters.

 

All media representatives are to be treated in the same manner as any other customer of Council, with promptness, transparency and respect.

 

Any media comment made by Councillors must abide by the Code of Conduct and Code of Meeting Practice.

Councillors who have a genuine concern about something at Inner West Council are encouraged to raise this with the General Manager or relevant Group Manager in the first instance in accordance with policy.  

 

5    Guidelines for Councillors

 

The following are examples of, but are not limited to, what Councillors should and should not do regarding media liaison.

Do …

·    Be mindful of your obligations under the Code of Conduct, Part 3, General Conduct, including the requirement not to damage Council’s reputation,  treat others with respect at all times and not discriminate, disadvantage or treat anyone adversely.

·    Be careful to communicate accurate information when dealing with the media.

Don’t …

·    Imply that you are speaking on behalf of Inner West Council.

·    Comment on any confidential matters (such as staff, personal information, legal advice, commercial-in-confidence and Code of Conduct complaints).

 

6    Process and approvals for Council media releases

 

The Media and Communications Coordinator is responsible for preparing and issuing media releases about Council's activities, decisions and plans.

 

Communications material pertaining directly to the Mayor, using his/her quotes or image – including but not limited to media releases, ‘Mayoral Messages’ for the Council page in the Inner West Courier, Council newsletters and forewords for reports – will be provided to the mayoral media unit for the Mayor’s approval prior to publication. The Mayor may also issue media releases on mayoral letterhead.

 

If other Councillors wish to have a Council media release issued as part of a Council decision this instruction must be included as part of a Council resolution.

Councillors may be quoted in Council media releases relating to motions for which they are responsible.

All Councillors will be provided with copies of general Council media releases for their information.

 

7    Media access to Council information and property

Media and the public are welcome to attend Council meetings to ensure transparency and access to information.

 

Allocated seating will be provided for media outlets at all Committee and Council meetings. Media representatives must adhere to Council's Code of Meeting Practice for Council meetings.

Requests from media outlets to film or photograph Council staff, including Councillors, facilities, meetings and events must be referred to the Media and Communications Coordinator for determination by the General Manager in consultation with relevant Council staff.

 

8    Media liaison in crisis or emergency situations

Only the Mayor and General Manager or their delegate/s are authorised to speak to the media on behalf of Council during a crisis or emergency situation.

Publishing information will be the responsibility of the Communications team with approval from the General Manager or their delegate.  

 

All crisis communications must abide by the Inner West Council Crisis Communications Guidelines.

9   Breaches of this policy

Breaches of this policy by Councillors may result in an investigation of the alleged breach in line with Council’s complaint handling policy, the Local Government Guidelines on Investigations and the Code of Conduct.

 

Any alleged criminal offence or allegation of corrupt conduct will be referred to the relevant external agency.

 

10   Policy review

 

This policy will be reviewed regularly as required and may change at any time, subject to a Council resolution.

 

 

 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

Item No:         C0818(3) Item 4

Subject:         Local Democracy - outcomes of proposed new advisory group structure public exhibition           

Prepared By:     Prue Foreman - Engagement Manager 

Authorised By:  Laura Stevens - Group Manager Communications, Engagement and Events

 

SUMMARY

Council at its meeting in May 2018 (C0518 Item 16) resolved to publicly exhibit a new advisory committees and groups’ structure; and requested a report back on exhibition outcomes and cost of the structure.

 

Council also requested a review of pre-amalgamation facilities committees; and information on regular Your Say Inner West/Council information and outreach street stalls. The report also contains further detail about the small grants program to support community-led, independent resident groups.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT Council:

 

1.   Receive and note the public exhibition outcomes of the proposed local democracy advisory committees and groups’ structure;

 

2.   Adopt the amended local democracy advisory committees and groups’ structure as outlined in the report and endorse recruitment to commence;

 

3.   Receive and note information about pre-amalgamation facilities committees and plans to engage the Inner West community about facilities over the next two-three years;

 

4.   Receive and note information about Your Say Inner West outreach stalls; and

 

5.   Adopt the proposed Residents’ Association Small Grants Program, funded from the Community Wellbeing Grants program to a maximum allocation of $7,500, reviewed within one year.

 

 

 

 

 

BACKGROUND

Contents:

1.   Public exhibition outcomes – proposed local democracy advisory committees and groups’ structure

2.   Amended advisory group structure resulting from public exhibition

3.   Pre-amalgamation facilities committees

4.   Your Say Inner West outreach stalls

5.   Resident Associations Small Grants Program

 

 

1.   Public exhibition outcomes – proposed local democracy advisory committees and groups’ structure

 

Council at its meeting in May 2018 (C0518 Item 16) resolved to publicly exhibit the local democracy advisory committees and groups' structure and the estimated cost. The public exhibition took place from 29 June to 29 July 2018.

 

Along with the structure proposed by Council, a potential arts and culture advisory committee identified during internal engagement was exhibited. The proposed structure of 18 advisory committees, working groups and a business forum was estimated to cost approximately $120,000 per annum, consisting mainly of staff time.

 

The exhibition was promoted through:

·    Your Say Inner West project page and e-news

·    Council column Inner West Courier

·    Social media

·    Media release

·    Emails to Strategic Reference Group members

·    Rates newsletter to all ratepayers

·    Council news – winter edition

 

Examples of the promotion are attached (Attachment 1: Promotion of public exhibition)

 

In total, 242 people visited the Your Say Inner West project page Local Democracy – new advisory groups. Of these, 45 people responded to the survey. The results were: 

 

 

Overwhelmingly, respondents supported the new structure.

 

Q2 – Comments

There were 37 responses to this question. The key themes were:

·    General support for the new structure (13)

·    Suggestions for new groups. Topics: NSW Government projects (1), finance (1), parks and roads (1), women’s (2), education (1), community wellbeing (1), development impacts (1), sports clubs and recreation (1), precinct committees (2)

·    Number of groups: too many (2), good that number has increased (1)

·    Number of meetings: too many (1), not enough (1)

·    Collaboration: supported (2)

 

Comments in full are attached with the officer response (Attachment 2: Public exhibition: community comments and Council officer response).

 

 

Two thirds of respondents have previously been members of at least one of the councils’ advisory groups.

 

Q4 – Of which group have you been a member?

There was a wide range of answers to this question. Many respondents have participated in advisory groups both before and after amalgamation. Comments in full are attached (Attachment 2: Public exhibition: community comments and Council officer response).

 

 

Two thirds of respondents were very or extremely likely to apply for membership of the new groups.

Q6-8 requested name and email addresses so Council can report back to participants on the decision. This information is kept confidential.

 

 

 

 

Survey participants came from across the LGA; the highest number was from Dulwich Hill (9).

 

 

Internal engagement

Staff including Group Managers and SRG facilitators recommended the formation of an additional Arts and Culture Advisory Committee. The Group Manager Community Services and Culture recommended amending Social Inclusion to Social Strategy Advisory Committee due to the formation of new advisory  committees/working groups focused on areas previously covered by Social Inclusion (Access, Multicultural, Seniors – as well as the existing LGBTIQ+ working group).

 

The Group Manager Community Services and Culture recommended that the Safety Committee proposed in the Council resolution change to a Safety Working Group, to enable more focus on project work. The Safety Working Group will collaborate with the twice-yearly Community Safety Forum recently resolved by Council (C0718 Item 1).

 

Community and Culture also proposed categorising some groups for which their service unit is responsible as either advisory committees with a strategic focus, or working groups with a capacity building focus. Further detail is available in an attached concept paper (Attachment 3: Concept Paper – Community Services and Culture advisory committees and working groups).

 

It is recommended that Council receive and note the results of the public exhibition

 

 

2.   Amended local democracy advisory committees and groups' structure resulting from public exhibition

 

Advisory committees, working groups and forums are part of Council’s Community Engagement Framework, helping to strengthen local participatory democracy. Inner West’s advisory committees, have no delegation ie they do not perform a function of Council but aim to provide advice and input to support Council’s decision-making and actions.

 

Taking into account the results of the public exhibition of the proposed local democracy advisory committees and groups' structure, including internal engagement, it is recommended Council adopt the following amended structure:

ADVISORY COMMITTEES (8)

·      Access Advisory Committee

·      Arts and Culture Advisory Committee

·      Environment Advisory Committee

·      Housing and Affordability Advisory Committee

·      Multicultural Advisory Committee

·      Planning and Heritage Advisory Committee

·      Social Strategy Advisory Committee

·      Transport Advisory Committee

WORKING GROUPS (9)

·      Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Working Group

·      Bicycle Working Group

·      Cooks River Working Group

·      LGBTIQ+ Working Group

·      Parramatta River Working Group

·      Safety Working Group

·      Seniors Working Group

·      Sydenham to Bankstown Working Group

·      Young Leaders Working Group

BUSINESS FORUM (1)

·      Quarterly business forum of local Chambers of Commerce and Business Associations

 

 

Table: Proposed local democracy advisory committees and groups' structure

The differences in procedures are highlighted below.

 

IWC local democracy advisory committees and groups’ structure

 

Advisory        committees

Working groups

  Business forum

 

·    Access

·    Arts and Culture

·    Environment

·    Housing and Affordability

·    Multicultural

·    Planning and Heritage

·    Social Strategy

·    Transport

 

·      Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander

·      Bicycle

·      Cooks River

·      LGBTIQ+

·      Parramatta River

·      Safety

·      Seniors

·      Sydenham to Bankstown

·      Young Leaders

 

 

·  Quarterly business forum

-consists of representatives of the business chambers /associations across the LGA, the IWC Mayor and General Manager.

PROCEDURES

 

· Strategic focus

 

· Recommendations to Council for decision

 

 

· Council may refer items to group for advice by resolution

 

· Council receives advice / recommendations through bi-monthly Local Democracy report to Council meeting

 

· Meeting minutes posted on Council's website

PROCEDURES

 

·  Project/capacity building focus

 

·  Recommendations to Group Manager for decision. May make recommendation with budget implication to Council via Advisory Committee

 

·  Council may refer items to group for advice by resolution

·  Council receives advice / recommendations through fortnightly Councillor update email

 

·  Updates posted on Council's website

PROCEDURES

 

·  Strategic focus

 

·  Advice by resolution

 

 

·  Council may refer items to forum for advice by resolution

 

·  Council receives advice / updates through bi-monthly Local Democracy report to Council meeting

 

·  Meeting summary posted on Council's website

 

 

GOVERNANCE

 

Administration

A Council staff member will administer each advisory committee, working group and business forum including scheduling meetings, taking minutes and recording recommendations as relevant to each group’s Terms of Reference.

 

Chair

Council encourages community members to chair meetings. Council will provide training on good chairing practice to increase community capacity. In some cases, a Councillor or staff member may chair the advisory committee, working group or business forum.

 

Councillor membership

Councillors are welcomed members and are encouraged to attend meetings of advisory committees, working groups or forums. Because Councillors are final decision-makers on the elected Council, they are not eligible to propose motions or vote on recommendations at advisory committee meetings; however their knowledge, opinion and input are always welcome.

 

Media

The Mayor and the General Manager are the designated media spokespeople for Council in accordance with Council’s Media Policy. Advisory committee, working group and business forum members may speak to the media about their own views but must not purport to represent Council.

Meeting schedule

Working groups and advisory committees will meet three or four times per year respectively as required, in agreement with members and Group Managers. Meetings will not be held on Tuesday nights to avoid clashes with Councillor briefings or meetings. The business forum will meet quarterly. Working groups will determine their meeting schedule to align with relevant projects.

 

Membership

Members will be recruited through an inclusive EOI process. In the event that there are more applications than places, membership will be matched as closely as possible to Council’s community profile in terms of gender, age, language spoken at home, and suburb of residence. A panel of Group Managers or their delegates will determine the applications, so the process is apolitical, against the criteria for each group. Membership is limited to a maximum of 15 per advisory committee with a quorum of 50% + one. People can be members of more than one advisory committee or working group. Some advisory committees will require lived experience in the terms of reference, e.g. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander; and Access. 

 

 

Reporting and transparency

•     Council may refer items to advisory committees, working groups and the business forum for advice/recommendation by resolution.

•     Advisory committees may make recommendations to the elected Council for decision/action through the bi-monthly Local Democracy report to Council meetings. The report is proposed for the fourth Tuesday Council meeting of March, May, July, September and November (with no report during the end-of-year recess). The report will also include an update on other forms of community engagement.

•     Advisory committees, which will have a strategic/capacity building focus, report recommendations to Council.

•     Working groups, which have a project focus, report recommendations to the relevant Group Manager for decision/action. Working group updates will be included in the fortnightly Councillor update email.

•     Working groups have a channel to recommend budget decisions directly to Council through an advisory committee, e.g. Parramatta and Cooks River working groups could recommend funding proposals to Council through the Environment Committee; alternatively a Councillor could put up a Notice of Motion on behalf of the working group.

•     A summary of all meetings will be posted on Council's website.

 

Review

An interim review of the advisory committees, working groups and business forum will take place after one year of operation and a full review at the end of the Council term. The review will be reported to Council.

 

Term of membership

The term of membership for advisory committees and working groups will align with the term of the elected Council plus one month. Recruitment for membership will take place after a report to the new elected Council.

 

Terms of Reference

Terms of Reference for each advisory committee/working group will be developed in collaboration with the members.

 

 

It is recommended that Council adopt the above local democracy advisory committees and groups' structure and endorse recruitment to commence.

 

 

3.  Pre-amalgamation facilities committees

 

The former councils had four facilities committees. Leichhardt Council had Clontarf Cottage, Annandale Community Centre and Balmain Town Hall Management Committees, and Ashfield had the Pratten Park Advisory Committee, while Marrickville did not have facilities committees.

 

The Leichhardt facilities committees operated in three of Leichardt’s eight venues: Clontarf Cottage and Balmain Town Hall which are unstaffed venues for hire; and Annandale Neighbourhood Centre which is staffed, providing tenanted space and programs as well as rooms for hire. The committees were administered by a Council officer.

 

The three management committees comprised interested local residents, some with a long history, particularly Clontarf Cottage where the members had an integral role in fighting against the demolition of the building in the 1980s, mounting a passionate and successful advocacy campaign.

 

Leichhardt Council reviewed its community facilities in 2011 resulting in improvements to bring governance in line with contemporary practice. Leichhardt Council introduced a centralised booking system for venue hire, managed by staff. Leichhardt Council also adopted a community resourcing policy standardising decisions regarding fee waivers and fee reductions. Prior to the establishment of the centralised booking system and the adoption of a consistent policy, the committees advised on fee scales. Committees also served an important social function for members. 

 

Minutes for the past few years however show that attendance/membership was relatively low and the committees often did not have a quorum for decision making. The committees mainly:

·    Received bookings reports

·    Submitted maintenance requests to the elected Council

·    Under general business, addressed other matters of broader interest to committee members outside the operation of the venue

 

Ashfield Council had one s355 facilities committee: the Pratten Park Advisory Committee. Comprised of users of Pratten Park, the members were mostly sporting clubs (cricket, soccer and tennis), the bowling club and Thirning Villa tenants. Residents were encouraged but rarely joined. 

 

The committees continued to meet, until they were dissolved upon proclamation of Inner West Council in May 2016.

 

Statistics below show that there has been little change in the number of hirers since amalgamation, though Council recognises that more can be done to increase community use of venues. 

 

Venue hirers – pre and post amalgamation

 

Regular groups -Clontarf Cottage 2015

 

Regular groups - Clontarf Cottage 2017

 

Regular groups - Balmain Town Hall & Meeting Room 2015

 

Regular groups -Balmain Town Hall & Meeting Room 2017

 

Balmain Toastmasters Public Speaking

Balmain Men's Group

Inner West Men’s Group

Sydney Scrabblers

Restorying Our Lives

Sydney Inner West Scrabble Club (BUGS)

Meditation with Bhante Sujato

Clontarf Cottage Management Committee –

Balmain Toastmasters Public Speaking

Balmain Men's Group

Inner West Men’s  Group

Sydney Scrabblers

Writing Workshop

 

Balmain Town Hall

The Metropolitan Orchestra

Balmain Library - Film Group

Author Talks: Library

Sunnyfield - HATCH

 

Hannaford Community Centre Classes  – transfer to BTH of 4 x weekly classes for 6 weeks

 

Balmain Town Hall Meeting Room

Balmain Combined Probus Club

Rhythm Factory

Balmain Mental Health Support Group

Balmain Library Knitting Group

Balmain Branch ALP Meetings

Imago

Balmain Town Hall Management

 

Balmain Town Hall

The Metropolitan Orchestra

Balmain Library –  Film Group

Author Talks: Library

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balmain Town Hall Meeting Room

Balmain Combined Probus Club

Rhythm Factory

Balmain Mental Health Carers Meeting

Balmain Library Knitting Group

Balmain Branch ALP Meetings

Imago

Coderdojo Classes

The Metropolitan Orchestra

 

Approx. 28 private events parties booked

Approx. 26 private events or parties booked

 

Approx. 34 bookings for the Town Hall and 26 for the Meeting Room

Approx. 43 bookings for the Town Hall and 33 for the Meeting Room

Other events (Council, community organisation), approx. 12

 

Other events – 6

 

 

 

 

 

Inner West Council now owns, manages and maintains 37 properties in the Community Services and Culture portfolio, the scale of which requires effective management and good governance.

 

Council has addressed contemporary building operation and management in a number of ways:

·    Land and Property Strategy to guide use of properties including leases/licences and bookable spaces soon to be considered by Council

·    Building maintenance, renewal and upgrades in accordance with Buildings Asset Management Plan adopted June 2018. This includes the 10 year capital works program which is reviewed annually. The program is currently being reviewed based on a major audit of all council buildings undertaken early this year

·    New Customer Request System due to launch this year by which community members can lodge maintenance requests online. Community members can currently call Council to lodge maintenance requests

·    Annual report on the condition of Council’s key public buildings resolved by Council (C0518 Item 15) with a future report due to Council on investment required for Balmain Town Hall over the next decade

·    Parks are planned through 10-year Plans of Management and Master Plans, developed with broad community engagement, and linked to the Long Term Financial Plan and Asset Management Plans

·    Centralised booking system to ensure transparency and equity of access

·    Draft Grants and Fee Scale Policy which outlines the allocation of grants and fee scales for Council venues and town halls recently publicly exhibited

·    Marketing plans in development to promote all Council venues and increase use

 

Council is committed to involving the community in its decision-making through robust engagement. It has established an LGA-wide Sports Stakeholder Forum for ongoing engagement with sporting clubs and has employed Parks Officers who are a ‘one-stop shop’ to easily log and fix maintenance issues in parks.

 

Council will engage broadly across the whole community over the next two-three years to develop:

·    Community and Cultural Assets Audit (2018/19) – including the 37 venues managed by Council

·    Programming and operations review for Community Services and Culture (2018/20)

·    Social Infrastructure Strategy 2019/20

 

Friends of Clontarf Cottage (FCC) formed by the members of the former Clontarf Cottage Management Committee recently contacted Council regarding a number of items including Council’s intentions regarding future facilities management committees. The FCC provided feedback on the public exhibition as follows:

 

Neither the Advisory or Work Committee structures make provisions for IWC Facilities committees: their mandate from council should include BOTH

a) Local resident direct on-the-ground participation in management and maintenance, monitoring and reporting of maintenance and security issues AND 

b) Local resident committee advisory roles in terms of ongoing recommendations for desirable improvements, enhancements, new functions and roles, disability provisions and renovations  of council neighbourhood centres and other local facilities.  

 

Facilities committees fit squarely into neither the proposed advisory committee structure nor the Work Committee structure but straddle both.

 

Our Provisional Recommendations (provisional as we haven't had the opportunity to convene about this IWC draft proposal as yet):  

 

1. we await the arranging of a meeting with the Mayor and our local councillors and former local facilities management committees of IWC, as foreshadowed by the Mayor, regarding these issues. 

2. we previously recommended to council, when consulted by the former administrator, that local residents' facilities participatory management committees be formed as sub-committees possibly meeting at least quarterly, of an overall unified IWC Facilities Work and Consultative /Advisory Committee, usually meeting less frequently, at least once annually and/or on an ad hoc basis, and reporting to IWC.

3. That IWC reconsiders and takes corrective action asap to reverse the implied devaluing and wastage of voluntary effort, commitment and goodwill in terms of local facilities committees.   

 

Council did not resolve to publicly exhibit information about facilities committees as Council had requested further information on the previous councils’ facilities committees.  Council acknowledges the contribution of the FCC, over many years, both before and after amalgamation. Council values the knowledge and commitment of the members to helping ensure community assets are preserved and enhanced for current and future generations.

 

Council has committed to undertaking an audit, service review and developing strategies to manage venues and community assets, as listed above. The FCC, along with other passionate and involved community groups and individuals will be invited to deeply engage in this process over the next two-three years.

 

The FCC has also been introduced to Council’s Community Operations Manager, who will assist in ensuring maintenance requests are followed up, as well as working on the marketing strategy to increase use. Council is also undertaking a feasibility investigation of Clontarf Cottage to inform a decision about toilet improvements in a heritage building context. The results will be available shortly for Council to review.

 

Given Council’s commitment to contemporary building management methods, robust plans for engaging with the community, and improvements in customer service requests (through the new CRM due for launch this year), as well as the scale of facilities managed by the amalgamated Council, it is not recommended to re-establish any of the former facilities committees at this time. It is proposed that Council review this position after completion of the audit, review and strategy discussed above.

4.  Your Say Inner West outreach stalls

 

Council requested a report on holding a Your Say Inner West/Council outreach stall at main street locations in addition to the stall held at events.

 

The Your Say Inner West (YSIW) brand is already very strong in the community. This is because it connects the community directly to Council’s decision-making. In accordance with the Community Engagement Framework, all engagements under the YSIW brand articulate clearly why we want the community’s input, how we will use the input, what the decision to be made is, when it will take place, and how we will report back to the community on how their input is used. These elements are all crucial to building and maintaining trust, each resident and each project at a time.

 

The Engagement team hosts a YSIW stall at Council’s key events, which is funded and resourced in the current budget. The program for 2018/19 is:

·    Sunday, 26 August 2018 – 11am-3pm – Footprints EcoFestival

·    Sunday, 16 September 2018 – 10am-4pm – Dulwich Hill Village Fair

·    Sunday,  7 October 2018 – 10am – 4pm – Summer Hill Festival

·    Sunday, 21 October 2018 – 10am-5pm – Marrickville Festival

·    Sunday, 28 October 2018 –10am  - 5pm – Norton Street Festa

·    Sunday, 24 February 2019 – 10am-4pm – Carnival of Cultures

·    Sunday, 19 May 2019 – 11am-4pm – Celebrate 2044!

 

Throughout the year, Council also hosts a number of pop-up YSIW stalls to engage the community in specific projects. Recent stalls have included:

·    Dawn Fraser Baths

·    Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre

·    Haberfield Community Facilities upgrade

·    Community Strategic Plan

·    GreenWay

·    Marrickville Golf Course Plan of Management and Master Plan

 

In all of these stalls, there is a clear purpose and reason for engaging the community. Trust is built. This is because there is a clear line of sight from the community’s input to the elected Council’s decision. This type of engagement increases community satisfaction because the community can see that they are influencing the decisions of Council.

 

It is imperative that any pop-up YSIW stall continues to build this trust, and importantly, does not take away from trust already built.

 

It is therefore recommended that Council should continue to hold project-specific YSIW stalls at main street locations in the 2018/19 year at times when there is genuine opportunity for input into key projects – this may include for example, park plans of management, public domain master plans, or strategy development. This can be funded from current budgets.

 

Should Council decide to expand the YSIW stall, it is proposed to hold five YSIW / Customer Service / marketing outreach stalls (one in each ward) to promote Council’s services and enable service requests to be lodged as well as promoting any current community engagements. This would entail a budget of approximately $4,000 of one-off expenses to establish the stall, $2,000 per stall to cover staff and production of marketing collateral costs, and $2,500/stall letterbox drop to residents – total $26,500. There is no budget for this currently so it would need to be offset from a reduction of service elsewhere.

 

 

5.  Small grants program for resident associations

 

Council resolved in May 2018 (C0518) to trial: ‘Support community-led independent resident groups through a small grants program to cover meeting costs such as venue hire.’

 

A draft small grants program has been prepared for associations who represent local residents on neighbourhood issues and provide opportunities for the local community to come together to discuss what's important to them. The program would fund up to ten small grants of $750 per annum for incorporated resident groups across the LGA. The funding is intended to support resident associations by subsidising their operational costs, for such items as: venue hire for meetings, printing, promotional costs, incorporation fees, etc.

 

The program would be funded from the existing Community Wellbeing Grants program to a maximum allocation of $7,500. This amount equates to one community wellbeing grant.

 

The Community Wellbeing Grants Program funding covers a calendar year with the first grants commencing from 1 January 2019. If adopted by Council, promotion of the program would commence immediately, administered by the Community Services and Culture team with input from the Engagement team.  Draft guidelines for the proposed Resident Association Small Grants Program are appended to the report.

 

The draft guidelines are attached (Attachment 4: Draft Guidelines – proposed Residents’ Association Small Grants Program).

 

It is recommended Council adopt the proposed small grants program and review within one year.

 

Council will also support community groups by establishing a page to promote them on the corporate website.

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

The proposed structure of 18 advisory committees, working groups and a business forum was estimated to cost approximately $120,000 per annum, consisting mainly of staff time.

 

Should Council decide to expand the YSIW stall, it is proposed to hold five YSIW/Customer Service/marketing outreach stalls (one in each ward) to promote Council’s services and enable service requests to be lodged as well as promoting any current community engagements. This would entail a budget of approximately $4,000 of one-off expenses to establish the stall, $2,000 per stall to cover staff and production of marketing collateral costs, and $2,500/stall letterbox drop to residents – total $26,500. There is no budget for this currently so it would need to be offset from a reduction of service elsewhere.

 

The proposed Residents’ Association Small Grants Program would be funded from the Community Wellbeing Grants program to a maximum allocation of $7,500, reviewed within one year.

 

 

OTHER STAFF COMMENTS

Staff and Group Managers from all relevant service units were engaged in the development of this report.

 

 

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

The public exhibition of the proposed local democracy advisory committees and groups' structure is outlined in detail in the report above.

 

 

CONCLUSION

The advisory committees, working groups and forums will demonstrate Council’s commitment to involving the community in its decision-making and enhance Council’s Community Engagement Framework. The Residents’ Association Small Grants Program will support community-led independent resident groups as resolved previously by Council.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

Promotion of public exhibition

2.

Public exhibition: community comments and Council officer response

3.

Concept Paper – Community Services and Culture advisory committees and working groups

4.

Draft Guidelines – proposed Residents’ Association Small Grants Program

  


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

Item No:         C0818(3) Item 5

Subject:         Funding Proposals for Balmain Public Square Heritage Project           

Prepared By:     Brooke Martin - Group Manager Properties, Major Building Projects and Facilities  

Authorised By:  Elizabeth Richardson - Deputy General Manager Assets and Environment

 

SUMMARY

The 2004 Darling Street Balmain Masterplan vision is to demolish the front of the Telstra exchange building and open up the public space to improve the presence of the heritage Post Office. At the 26th June 2018 meeting Council resolved to support the project in principle and requested a report on funding options. It is recommended that Council fund the project by deferring the public square improvement works in 2018/19 to fund the demolition project and reprioritise project funding in the 2019/20 year for the public square improvement works.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT:

 

1.       The Balmain public square heritage project Option A be funded in the 2018/19 financial year with $1.1M and 2019/20 financial year with $500,000; and

 

2.       That the project is funded by deferral and reprioritisation of the other Town Centre improvement works identified in the Long Term Financial Plan.

 

 

 

 

BACKGROUND

Council resolved at its meeting of 26 June 2018 the following:

 

 THAT:

1.   A full report on the upgrade of the Dawn Fraser pool and the significant increase in funding required be brought to the next available council meeting. The report to include:

•      An outline of the works planned;

•      A breakdown of estimated costs;

•      A full explanation as to why costs have more than doubled;

•      An assessment of which works are urgent and which are not; and

•      A proposed timeline for the works.

 

2.   A report on the funding proposal options available for council to fund in full the Balmain Public Square heritage project Option A (C0518 Item 27 22/0518) and the full upgrade works at the Dawn Fraser Pool heritage project as required with revised costings. The report to include but not be limited by:

 

•      A loan to meet additional costs for both projects.

•      Identification of other available funding sources.

•      A review of capital works and the updated timelines and delivery schedules.

 

3.    That Council supports in principle completing the Dawn Fraser Pool heritage project refurbishment and the Balmain Public Square heritage project Option A.

 

In 2016, Council and Telstra agreed to a partial demolition of the building and public space improvements. The DA for the demolition is approved and Council has engaged with the community on the public space design. Council and Telstra have investigated ways to decrease the cost to demolish and alternative options including utilisation of the current building and increasing the public square.

 

Three options were presented to Council meeting 22nd May 2018- See Attachment 1 of this report.

 

At the 26th June 2018 meeting, Council resolved to support Option A, the demolition of the front of the Telstra building and provide a public square as per the original agreed project and Deed agreement with Telstra.

 

This project is estimated to cost $1.1million for the demolition and $500,000 for the public domain improvement works. Total project cost is estimated at $1.6M.

 

Current funding for the project includes

·    $810,000 for the demolition rolled over from 2017/18 Q3 budget review into 2018/19.

·    $340,000 for the public square improvement works in 2018/19.

 

The demolition works will be undertaken by Telstra in accordance with the Deed Agreement signed in 2016. The demolition works can be undertaken in the current financial year.

 

The public square concept design is complete, detailed design can commence in the current financial year. The Public square works can be completed in 2019/20 providing another project is deferred to accommodate funding and council project management capacity.

 

FUNDING OPTIONS

 

In line with the Council resolution of the 26 June 2018, the following funding options are provided for Council’s consideration.

 

Option No.1  - Reprioritise works in the long term financial plan

 

Project Description

2018/2019

2019/2020

2020/2021

2021/2022

Town Centres Upgrade- Capital

 

 

 

 

Balmain East - Darling Street Between Union Street & Little Nicholson Street

 

 

80,000

 

Balmain East - Darling Street Between Duke Street & Nicholson Street

 

 

460,000

 

Rozelle - Darling Street - Red Lion St to Denison St

214,000

 

 

 

Balmain - Elliot St - Intersection

 

 

 

420,000

Rozelle  - Darling Street - Waterloo St to Victoria Rd

 

 

 

450,000

Leichhardt  - Flood Street, Marketplace

 

 

50,000

150,000

Balmain - Birchgrove Rd & King St - Intersection

 

 

 

100,000

Dulwich Hill - Dulwich Hill Station Centre Upgrade

 

140,000

 

450,000

Leichhardt - Marion Street - No. 153 to Flood St

 

 

 

100,000

Balmain - Darling St and Montague St - New Plaza (old Telstra site)

340,000

 

 

 

Leichhardt  - Civic Precinct - Leichhardt - DESIGN

 

 

 

250,000

 

 

Option No. 2 End of financial year surplus

Work is currently underway on establishing the amount of end of year surplus from 2017/18. This will not be fully understood for another 2-3 weeks from the time of writing this report

Option No.3 Loan

As assessment has been made of Council’s capacity to borrow funds for the three key infrastructure projects due for consideration at Council’s Meeting of the 26 August 2018

2019/20

2020/21

2021/22

2022/23

2023/24

2024/25

2025/26

2026/27

2027/28

 

Annual Repayments:

 

     - Telstra Site

                   60,421

                   60,421

                   60,421

                   60,421

                   60,421

                   60,421

                   60,421

                   60,421

        60,421

 

     - Dawn Fraser

                 483,372

                 483,372

                 483,372

                 483,372

                 483,372

                 483,372

                 483,372

                 483,372

     483,372

 

     - LPAC

                 265,855

                 265,855

                 265,855

                 265,855

                 265,855

                 265,855

                 265,855

                 265,855

    265,855

 

Adjusted Current Ratio

                       2.17

                       1.70

                       1.71

                       1.48

                       1.44

                       1.56

                       1.47

                       1.38

            0.99

 

*** Council is required to maintain a 1.5x current ratio

 

Council’s LTFP is based on maintaining fit for the future current ratio of 1.5.  Borrowing of funds to allow additional capital expenditure would financially impact the ratio such that the Inner West would not meet the 1.5 ratio requirements in a number of years in the LTFP.  The only option, if Council chooses to comply with the ratio requirement, is to reallocate funds from other budgeted capital or operating projects.

 

Having considered the above, it is recommended that if Council wishes to pursue the project, that it be funded by a reprioritisation of Town Centre upgrade projects within the Long Term Financial Plan.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

There is currently a $300,000 shortfall in funding for the demolition of the Telstra building project.

 

If Council wishes to pursue the project, it is recommended:

 

·    The $340,000 budgeted for the public square improvement works in the 2018/19 budget be reprioritised in order to allocate:

$300,000 to undertake the demolition in the current year; and

$40,000 to complete the detailed design for the improvement works.

 

·    Reprioritise other Town Centre upgrade works to undertake the public square improvement works estimated at $500,000, in 2019/20.

 

OTHER STAFF COMMENTS

Group Managers’ Roads, Traffic and Stormwater, Trees, Parks and Sportsfields, Recreation and Aquatics, and Finance were consulted in writing this paper.

 

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Nil required for this paper.

 

CONCLUSION

In 2016 Council and Telstra agreed to a partial demolition of the building and public space improvements.

 

At the 26th June meeting Council resolved to support the project in principle and requested a report on funding options. It is recommended that if Council wishes to pursue the project, that it fund the project by deferring the public square improvement works in 2018/19 to fund the demolition project by $300,000, $40,000 for detailed design and reprioritise project funding in the 2019/20 year for the public square improvement works.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

C0518 Item 27 - Balmain Telstra Building and Public Square Project

  


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

Item No:         C0818(3) Item 6

Subject:         Dawn Fraser Baths Master Plan and Essential Works Update           

Prepared By:     Josephine Bennett - Group Manager Recreation and Aquatics and Brooke Martin - Group Manager Properties, Major Building Projects and Facilities 

Authorised By:  John Warburton - Deputy General Manager Community and Engagement

 

SUMMARY

The Dawn Fraser Baths is the oldest amateur swimming pool and water polo club in Australia and is listed as a nationally significant heritage item. The Dawn Fraser Masterplan identifies initiatives over the next 10 years and is recommended for public exhibition. The first stage of the masterplan is the essential works project. The estimated costs for the essential works has increased by $4.2M due to the Southern Pavilion structure not capable of being repaired and major flood inundation making the hydraulic and electrical services not compliant. Funding of the increased works is recommended through a Greater Sydney Sports Facility Grant and/or reprioritisation of projects in the funded Long Term Financial Plan. Regular monitoring of the structure and flood inundation is required to ensure public safety

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT:

 

1.   The draft Dawn Fraser Baths Master Plan (ATTACHMENT 1) be placed on public exhibition for a period of 28 days;

 

2.   The results of the public exhibition and community engagement process are presented to Council recommending further action;

 

3.   The new scope essential works are undertaken as soon as practical following IDA approval;

 

4.   Council apply for a $4.2 million Greater Sydney Sports Facility Grant;

 

5.   Council identify which projects are reprioritised to fund the gap, in the event that such a Grant application is not, or only partially successful;

 

6.   Monitoring of the structural integrity and flood inundation continues and where the risk is too high the Baths are closed to public; and

 

7.   Write to OEH requesting any potential special grant funding programs.

 

 

 

 

BACKGROUND

The Dawn Fraser Baths is the oldest amateur swimming pool and water polo club in Australia and is listed as a nationally significant heritage item. The Baths are located on a harbour side peninsula within the grounds of Elkington Park, and include an adjacent caretaker’s cottage. The Baths, the caretaker’s cottage and the grounds they are located within are interconnected and form a distinct precinct within the park.

 

 

 

 

 

Council resolved at its meeting of 26 June 2018 the following:

 

 THAT:

1.   A full report on the upgrade of the Dawn Fraser pool and the significant increase in funding required be brought to the next available council meeting. The report to include:

•      An outline of the works planned;

•      A breakdown of estimated costs;

•      A full explanation as to why costs have more than doubled;

•      An assessment of which works are urgent and which are not; and

•      A proposed timeline for the works.

 

2.   A report on the funding proposal options available for council to fund in full the Balmain Public Square heritage project Option A (C0518 Item 27 22/0518) and the full upgrade works at the Dawn Fraser Pool heritage project as required with revised costings. The report to include but not be limited by:

 

•      A loan to meet additional costs for both projects.

•      Identification of other available funding sources.

•      A review of capital works and the updated timelines and delivery schedules.

 

3.    That Council supports in principle completing the Dawn Fraser Pool heritage project refurbishment and the Balmain Public Square heritage project Option A.

 

Dawn Fraser Baths Master Plan

 

The Inner West Council’s Operational Plan and Budget 2017-18 includes an initiative to develop a master plan for the Dawn Fraser Baths in 2018.  The public domain planning team has worked collaboratively across multiple disciplines within Council to develop a holistic 10 year plan of improvements for the Baths.

 

Master Plan Project Scope

 

The scope of the master plan includes:

 

·    The Dawn Fraser Baths including the buildings and pool surrounds

·    Access pathways to the Baths from nearby streets and through Elkington Park

·    A review of Elkington Park’s public toilet location and design

·    Park elements raised by the community during community engagement

·    Review of available car parking

·    Review of existing vegetation and slope stabilisation options

·    Improvement of stormwater quality for water entering the harbour

·    Public domain elements that impact the design and construction of these listed elements.

 

The aim of the master plan has been to develop a ten year plan of improvements at the Baths for users and staff, while maintaining the existing character and sense of place.  The master plan provides an illustrative representation of the proposed improvements and includes text, images, plans and diagrams that are easily understood by a variety of audiences.  The master plan is fully costed to understand budget requirements and integrated with Council’s forward financial and asset plans.

 

 

Master Plan Process

 

Public Domain Planning has used its internal design team to develop the public domain master plan.  Staff worked collaboratively with Council stakeholders and the community to develop a master plan for the Baths.  Detailed site analysis reviewed site history, zoning, stormwater and drainage design, active transport connections, pathway and access networks, Existing trees, existing parking, indigenous vegetation types, biodiversity and revegetation strategies, park furniture,. The combination of site analysis and stakeholder input produced opportunities and constraints that were used to establish the master plan design strategies.  The strategies were costed to understand financial implications of proposed upgrades and the integrated into Council forward capital budget.

 

Report Structure

 

The report is divided into six sections for easy reading.

 

(1) Project context

The project context provides an introduction including background to the project, planning framework, integration with other Council strategies, integration with the Inner West Council Draft Community Strategic Plan (CSP), project objectives, aims and project methodology.

(2) Site Analysis

Each of the site elements considered in the development of the master plan, including site opportunities and constraints, have been mapped and described in the site analysis section with plans and text.

(3) Community Engagement

The community engagement process for the project is summarised in this section of the report.  Common themes of feedback from the community and stakeholders are also summarised for easy reference.

(4) Design Principles

The design principles articulate the lens for which all design decisions should be made for the Baths. By considering the design principles during the implementation stage, it will ensure the project objectives are being met as elements are delivered.

(5) Master Plan

The master plan strategies have been depicted in plan with supporting text and images. The plans articulate the spatial layout of design elements, with text describing the design outcomes. Images have been used to support the plans and text, providing a general overview of the character of proposed elements.

(6) Implementation plan

The proposed upgrades are costed via an opinion of probable costs and prioritised based on community feedback and asset condition.

 

 

Master Plan Proposals

 

The draft master plan proposes strategies that aim to improve the user experience at the Baths and in Elkington Park, while maintaining the existing character and sense of place.  Some of the master plan strategies include:

 

·    Renovate the male and female showers, toilets and change rooms

·    Provide unisex family change rooms

·    Provide at an equal access toilet, shower and change room

·    Provide additional seating options with moveable tables, chairs and sun lounges around the pool deck

·    Install pool-side shade umbrellas

·    Upgrade the existing lighting at the Baths to meet water polo match play requirements

·    Install a curated memorabilia display area

·    Improve the entry configuration and access from the harbour foreshore

·    Renovate the foreshore car park to improve equal access car parking and drop off area and provide an accessible route from the car park to the Baths entry

·    Improve the vehicle access driveway from Fitzroy Avenue

·    Raise the Baths floor level to mitigate climate change and sea level rise

·    Raise the beach area so entry is flush with the pool deck  and install children’s seating terraces at the beach edges

·    Undertake weed removal and bank stabilisation with new locally native tree, shrub and groundcover plantings on the escarpment immediately behind the Baths

·    Improve the playground within Elkington Park and include nature play and planting

·    Renovate the public toilet facility within Elkington Park

·    Include Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) options to improve quality of stormwater entering the harbour

 

Heritage Collection

The Friends of Dawn Fraser Pool have employed an archivist to sort, assess and index the collection of documents, ephemera, trophies and photographs that are currently stored at the facility.  Council has offered to house the collection at Balmain Library archives while the upgrade takes place and will assist with the packing and transporting of the collection.   It is proposed that while the collection is in Council’s care, the Balmain community history staff and potentially volunteers digitise the images.

 

DAWN FRASER BATHS ESSENTIAL WORKS

 

Original Scope of Works

In 2013, a condition assessment report was commissioned by Council that highlighted a scope of works. This scope was used in 2017 to brief an Architectural firm to undertake detailed design and lodge a DA. TKD Architects, a reputable firm with heritage experience was engaged on 04 October 2017.

The original scope of works included the following;

·    Upgrade structure and replace inadequate members and connections.

·    Replace shoes to main posts / Reinstate internal posts along colonnade

·    Remove all external cladding and replace with stainless steel colorbond.

·    Upgrade first floor decking/ Upgrade amenities blocks, offices and kiosk

·    Upgrade electrical switchboard/ BCA compliance when possible

·    Provide sprinkler system to entire baths / Rectify Storm water line/ improve accessibility

A DA for the works was lodged on 11 December 2017 to IWC, as well as Department of Heritage and the Fisheries Departments. This scope was estimated to cost $2.3M and a suitable budget was available in the 2017/18 and 2018/19 years. Concurrently the community was consulted for the new master plan for Elkington Park, including access to the baths-to be at a later stage.

Issues identified during the detail design phase

Detailed design continued through January and March where major issues were identified including the following;

1.   The structure is not capable of being repaired.

The structural engineers report identified that 70% of the timbers of the Southern pavilion need to be replaced as they are undersized or too damaged by the marine environment. The Eastern end of the Southern pavilion is worse than previously reported and recommended to prop the structure.

2.   The structure is under the flood planning zone

The hydraulic Engineer reported that the Southern pavilion is subject to king tide flooding (last occurrence on 03 January 2018) and all floor wastes in the kiosk and amenities areas, as well as shower wastes are subject to flooding from seawater entering the sewer system and, thus, cannot be certified. This issue means hobs in the bathroom will need to be built, which makes them inaccessible.

3.   Complete fire compliance cannot be achieved

The sprinkler system installation is restricted by the minimum head heights that are existing in the Southern pavilion and cannot be implemented.

4.   Users feedback wanting new facilities and stop flooding

The DA notification comments identified that the user groups would rather delay or stage the works for noticeable improvements to the facilities including new family change rooms and raised floors rather than proceed with the proposed works lodged with the DA.

Feasibility Investigations

A feasibility was undertaken on what works are essential to the retention of the Southern Pavilion. A structural engineering report identified that structural elements /systems are categorised as ‘moderately to severely deteriorated’ and/or inadequate for purpose’. (ACOR report June 2018)

 

In order to certify the new hydraulic work, compliance with the National Construction Code and AS3500.2 Plumbing and Drainage Code is essential. The existing building is inundated by water more than 100mm, including entering the sewer system through floor wastes making the amenities unusable and allowing untreated sewage into the building and the ocean. The Code and AS require that inlets are above flood levels and where there is flooding they must be atleast 150mm above the declared flood level.

 

The current water ingress into the building produces an unacceptable electrical risk of harm to staff and visitors. With the anticipated sea level rise this will increase the risk of harm even further.

 

A detailed oceanographic study has been undertaken using the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) data for sea level rise projections and a 2018 survey. Cardno engineers have determined the extent of current inundation of the South Pavilion and the anticipated impacts of sea level rise. Options were generated for assessment comparing potential sea level rise with asset life, capital cost, lifecycle cost, compliance, heritage aesthetics and physical heritage impact. See table below for comparisons.

Consideration by the Consultant team, Council staff and Office Environment Heritage (OEH) identified that OPTION 2, raising the boardwalk, South Pavilion and Central Pavilion by approximately 1 metre was the preferred option.

 

New Scope of works

·    Design for sea level rise and raising the boardwalk, South Pavilion and Central Pavilion  by approximately 1m;

·    Demolition and reconstruction of the South Pavilion and Central Pavilion and re-using as much original fabric/ timber;

·    New compliant bathroom and change rooms on ground floor;

·    Upgrade electrical switchboard

·    BCA compliance

·    Provide sprinkler system to entire baths

·    Storm water upgrade

·    Improve accessibility

·    Refurbishment of piers

·    Waterpolo lighting

 

Urgency of the Works

Access to the first floor of the Southern pavilion is now restricted to 2 persons at one time due the structural integrity of the building. The structure is leaning towards the sea and to mitigate any public safety risk, a Structural Engineer is undertaking monthly monitoring to check that the structure is safe, especially during high wind periods. If there are excessive high winds or king tides the baths will need to close during that period. If at any time the structural engineer advises that the structure is no longer safe, there will be consideration of closing the pool until the essential works are undertaken.

 Photo 1 Southern Pavillion

 

Photo 2 Amenities including structural supports  Photo 3 Structural and roof connection

 

 

 

Integrated Development Assessment

An Integrated Development Assessment (IDA) is required this includes OEH approval and Council through the Independent Planning and Assessment Panel approval. Discussions including a presentation to the Heritage Council and staff at OEH and Council regulators have been ongoing during the preparation of the IDA. At the time of writing this report it is expected that the IDA submission will be made 24th August 2018.

Proposed timeline of the Works

·    IDA submission 24th August 2018, 12 week assessment period assumed Sep – Nov 2018

·    Detailed Design and Tender documentation, 9 weeks, Sep – Oct 2018

·    Procurement of construction contractor, 12 weeks Nov –Feb 2019

·    Construction works, 52 weeks April 2019 – April 2020.

A staging methodology to enable the Baths to remain open through summer is considered feasible. There is assumed no access to the public during the winter. Stage 1 April til Oct 2019 undertake the works to the West wing, Stage 2 Oct til April 2020 undertake the works to the Central and East wing. The construction phase will require installation of a floating dam to prevent the spread of debris, a scaffold/working platform into the bath area, rerouting the public access into the bath area, temporary amenities and staff/first aid areas and barge access for large materials.

High risks have been identified including Heritage approvals, unexpected conditions, marine environment, limited access and limited number of appropriately experienced contractors. These risks will be monitored through the project with mitigation plans implemented.

Estimate of Cost

The current estimate of the works is identified below.

Description

Cost

Consultants & Fees

$700,000

Building works

$4,000,000

Waterpolo lighting*

$180,000

Contingency & Escalation

$1,520,000

Refurbishment of piers

$300,000

Total

$6,700,000

* Waterpolo lighting is not essential maintenance works and can be removed and undertaken at a later time, it is included in the DA approval and provides increased alignment to the criteria of the Greater Sydney Sports Facility Fund Grant.

** Includes 10% design contingency, 15% construction contingency, escalation til April 2020.

*** Project Management is included in the salaries and wages of staff.

Funding proposal options

Current status of funding

·    2017/18 $237,000 actual costs on consultancy services.

·    2018/19 $2,177,856.78 available including rolling over $96,856.78 from 2017/18 budget Q3

·    Funding gap 2019/20 $3,285,144 and 2020/21 $1,000,000

 


 

Option 1 - Grant Applications

An Expression of Interest for $4.2M to the Greater Sydney Sports Facility Grant program is underway and closes end of August. The criteria for this program align with the Dawn Fraser Baths being a Regional Facility for Waterpolo. If the project is deemed suitable a further application will be requested in October 2018 and must be submitted in December 2018. Successful applications will be advised in February 2019.

There are some small Heritage Grants available however they are less than $150,000. It is recommended that a letter to OEH be drafted to request potential special funding opportunities due to the heritage significance.

Option 2 Loan

A potential option of an increased loan including the Ashfield Aquatic Centre, Dawn Fraser and Telstra Building as below. There is no business case for Dawn Fraser increasing income based on these essential maintenance works.

2019/20

2020/21

2021/22

2022/23

2023/24

2024/25

2025/26

2026/27

2027/28

Annual Repayments:

- Telstra Site

60,421

60,421

60,421

60,421

60,421

60,421

60,421

60,421

60,421

- Dawn Fraser

483,372

483,372

483,372

483,372

483,372

483,372

483,372

483,372

483,372

- LPAC

265,855

265,855

265,855

265,855

265,855

265,855

265,855

265,855

265,855

Adjusted Current Ratio

2.17

1.70

1.71

1.48

1.44

1.56

1.47

1.38

0.99

*** Council is required to maintain a 1.5x current ratio

 

Council’s LTFP is based on maintaining fit for the future current ratio of 1.5.  Borrowing of funds to allow additional capital expenditure would financially impact the ratio such that the Inner West would not meet the 1.5 ratio requirements in a number of years in the LTFP.  The only option, if Council chooses to comply with the ratio requirement, is to reallocate funds from other budgeted capital or operating projects.

 

Option 3 Reprioritise Existing Projects in the LTFP

The below projects are currently funded either by S94/Developer Contributions or Council funds in the 4 year delivery program.

Project Description

2018/2019

2019/2020

2020/2021

2021/2022

Trees parks and sports fields

TRE - Skate Park in Callan Park - Construction

483,000

800,000

 

 

TRE - Ann Cashman Reserve Playground Upgrade

 

 

50,000

30,000

TRE - Shields Playground Upgrade

82,500

 

 

TRE - Darley Road Leichhardt Netball Courts

782,285

 

 

TRE - Datchett St Incinerator Removal & Interpretation Piece

100,000

100,000

 

 

Town Centres Upgrade- Capital

Bal/E - Darling Street Between Union Street & Little Nicholson Street

 

 

80,000

Bal/E - Darling Street Between Duke Street & Nicholson Street

 

 

460,000

Rzle - Darling Street - Red Lion St to Denison St

214,000

Bal - Elliot St - Intersection

 

420,000

Rzle - Darling Street - Waterloo St to Victoria Rd

 

450,000

Leich - Flood Street, Marketplace

 

 

50,000

150,000

Bal - Birchgrove Rd & King St - Intersection

100,000

Dul/H - Dulwich Hill Station Centre Upgrade

140,000

450,000

Leich - Marion Street - No. 153 to Flood St

 

 

100,000

Bal - Darling St and Montague St - New Plaza (old Telstra site)

340,000

 

 

Leich - Civic Precinct - Leichhardt - DESIGN

250,000

Buildings Program

PRO - Balmain Town Hall Site renewal works

286,000

200,000

PRO - Leichhardt Oval upgrade works

603,000

400,000

PRO - Elliot Street Kiosk renewal works

358,000

PRO - Gladstone Park upgrade works

50,000

543,500

PRO - Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre redevelopment works

150,000

150,000

2,808,400

2,419,300

PRO - Leichhardt Park Indoor Recreation - Multi purpose indo

100,000

200,000

1,800,000

Renewal Recreation and Aquatics

 

 

1,000,000

1,100,000

PRO - Pioneers Memorial Park renewal works

50,000

512,000

PRO - Darley Road Amenities - Amenities Block Buildings

 

 

 

348,000

PRO - Leichhardt Park No 2 Amenities upgrade + canteen

 

 

24,290

270,000

Renewal Trees, parks & Sportsfields Services

1,000,000

1,100,000

1,400,000

King George Park Storage Facility Upgrade

70,000

Upgrade of Air Raid Shelter for Storage

300,000

Renewal Community Services

550,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

Telstra Site - 366C Darling St Balmain

810,000

 

Option 4 End of Financial Year Potential Surplus

Work is currently underway on establishing the amount of end of financial year surplus from 2017/18. This will not be fully understood for another 2 – 3 weeks from the time of writing this report.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

The master plan costs have been estimated to total $9,857,900.00.  The master plan costs have been grouped under six headings relating to the area and type of improvements proposed.  The cost breakdown associated with each grouping is listed below:

 

Stage

Amount

Essential works

$6,700,000

Poolside furniture and other master plan strategies

$1,117,058

Park and pathway access improvements

$2,040,842

 

 

Total

$9,857,900

 

There is a gap in funding for the essential works project of $4.2M over 2019/20 and 2020/21. It is recommended that Council make an application to the Greater Sydney Sports Facility Grant program and/or reprioritise the currently funded projects.

 

STAFF COMMENTS

The development of the master plan required collaboration with all disciplines across Council.  Staff input occurred multiple times and included a variety of forums including one on one meetings, design workshops, email correspondence, telephone discussions and a final review of the draft master plan.  The collaborative process has resulted in the development of multifunctional outcomes that benefit multiple users.  The internal stakeholders across Council included representatives from:

 

·    Development Assessment and Regulatory Services

·    Trees, Parks and Sport fields

·    Environment and Sustainability

·    Roads, Traffic and Stormwater

·    Properties, Major Building Projects and Facilities

·    Finance

·    Strategic Planning

·    Library and History Services

·    Recreation and Aquatics

·    Community Services and Culture

·    Communications, Engagement and Events

 

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

During October and November 2017 Inner West Council undertook community engagement to understand the current use and future vision from the community for the Dawn Fraser Baths. The community engagement included interactive engagement sessions and an online survey at the Inner West Council ‘Your Say Inner West’ website. During the six week engagement period, the online website received 1965 visits with 215 surveys completed. The engagement sessions also received input from over 125 respondents who completed interactive activities, paper surveys, had lengthy discussions with Council staff and submitted letters to Council.

 

The scope of the engagement included feedback on:

 

·    The Dawn Fraser Baths;

·    The caretaker’s cottage;

·    Access pathways to the Baths and the Caretaker’s Cottage through Elkington Park;

·    The Elkington Park public toilets;

·    Car parking areas, embankment, stabilisation and storm water design solutions to ameliorate the degradation of the southern pavilion; and

·    Public domain elements that impact the design and construction of these listed elements.

·    Information on how attendees use the space and from where attendees travel from.

 

The feedback highlighted the majority of those that visit the Dawn Fraser Baths live on the Balmain peninsula, although 16% of visitors do travel from a wide range of suburbs including Surry Hills, Caringbah and Vauclause.

 

From the feedback, a clear list of actions has been requested by the community which has been considered in the master plan. The Community Engagement Report is included as ATTACHMENT 2.  Some of the feedback includes:

 

·    Retain the existing unique heritage and character of the Baths and Elkington Park;

·    Complete upgrades at the Baths once and do the works properly;

·    Retain the existing native vegetation on the slope between the Baths and Elkington Park - although remove the weed trees and Lantana;

·    Improve access pathways to the Baths and into the water at the Baths;

·    Renovate or improve the toilets and change rooms.  Provide family change rooms at the Baths;

·    Provide more shade options including over the beach area;

·    Provide more / different seating options;

·    Display the heritage memorabilia relating to the Baths;

 

Additional engagement was completed with stakeholders including the Balmain Swimming Club and Water Polo Club.  The feedback included a written submission that along with the other feedback from the community has been used as a layer of analysis (e.g. proposed flood levels or building structural condition) and design direction to progress the designs for both the essential works package and master plan.

 

Public Exhibition

 

Public exhibition is proposed as the next phase of the master planning process. Public exhibition will allow the community and stakeholders another round of input on the draft master plan to ensure proposed strategies meet community requests.

 

The public exhibition period will be for a period of 28 days, from Friday 31 August 2018 until Friday 28 September 2018.  All submissions will be reviewed with feedback integrated in an updated master plan. The feedback will be presented back to Council in a schedule for transparency, along with the final draft master plan. The public exhibition will be advertised via the Inner West Courier, the Your Say Inner West website, Facebook posts and Twitter.

 

CONCLUSION

Master Plan has followed the required collaborative process to establish the values consistent with the views of the local community and stakeholders. To ensure the plans meet the needs of the users it is now appropriate for the wider community to again have the opportunity for input through a public exhibition process. The essential works to preserve the southern pavilion require additional funding due to the condition of the structure and major flood inundation. If the essential works are not undertaken the baths may need to close due to major risks of structural failure and flood water inundation impacting sewer and electrical safety. In the interim, a monitoring regime is in place to ensure public safety is maintained.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

Draft Dawn Fraser Baths Master Plan

2.

Dawn Fraser Baths Community Engagement Report

  


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

Item No:         C0818(3) Item 7

Subject:         Draft Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre (LPAC) Master Plan           

Prepared By:     David Petrie - Coordinator Public Domain Planning 

Authorised By:  Josephine Bennett - Group Manager Recreation and Aquatics

 

SUMMARY

This report is seeking Council’s endorsement to place the draft Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre (LPAC) Master Plan on public exhibition.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT:

 

1.       The draft master plan for Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre (ATTACHMENT 1) be placed on public exhibition for a period of 28 days and submissions be received for a further 14 days; and

 

2.       The results of the public exhibition and community engagement process be presented to Council recommending further action.

 

 

 

 

BACKGROUND

The Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre (LPAC) was originally developed in 1960 and while the main 50m pool has not been upgraded, the Centre has received partial upgrades in 2008 and 2016. The last master plan for the Centre was developed in 2005 and Leichhardt Council had determined that it no longer reflected the needs of Council and the community. Consequently, Leichhardt Council engaged Otium Planning Group in 2016 to undertake the development of a new master plan in 5 stages, the first being community engagement. Following the merger in 2016 and change in scope of aquatic facilities across the LGA, Inner West Council concluded arrangement with Otium in early 2017 at the end of Stage 1 and brought the master plan in-house to be undertaken by specialist staff.

 

Project Scope

 

The scope of the master plan has included a review of all LPAC facilities and the context in which they are located.  Specific elements of the scope include:

·    The existing LPAC building including gym, cycle studios and associated fitness areas

·    Layout of the administration areas, entry and cafe

·    Pool facilities including the program pool 1, program pool 2, diving pool (program pool 3) and 50m lap pool

·    Existing turf and recreation areas

·    Seating and shade opportunities

·    Access pathways and circulation to the facility from nearby streets and Leichhardt Park and internally within LPAC

·    A review of car parking, access to the Bay Run, and access for maintenance vehicles to and from the site

·    Public domain elements that impact the design and construction of these listed elements

 

 

 

 

Aquatic Facilities across the Inner West

 

The Inner West is well serviced with aquatic facilities and Council operates the following centres:

 

·    Annette Kellerman Aquatic Centre, Enmore

·    Ashfield Swimming Pool, Ashfield

·    Dawn Fraser Baths, Balmain

·    Fanny Durack Pool, Petersham

·    Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre, Leichhardt

 

At least 37% of the people consulted during the development of the draft Recreation Needs Study - A Healthier Inner West, visit an aquatic facility weekly. Aquatics facilities form part of a diverse range of recreational opportunities that respond to the modern demands of Australian communities. These facilities provide services which promote health and fitness, water safety skills and confidence, and community. They are a place for competition and play; as well places to seek relief from the summer heat. Each of Inner West’s aquatic facilities has a different offering for the community and they work together to fulfill the Inner West community’s aquatic recreation needs. 

 

The draft needs study highlights that while Council already has a high provision of aquatic centres and recommends increasing capacity at existing facilities to meet future population needs, including upgrades at Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre.  The recommendations of the draftr LPAC Master Plan align with and support the recommendations in the draft Recreation Needs Study - A Healthier Inner West.

 

Asset Condition

 

In 2011, Leichhardt Council completed the LPAC Lifecycle Cost Analysis report.  The scope of this report reviewed structural elements at the Centre including the 50m lap pool, diving pool (program pool 3) and children’s ‘mushroom’ water play pool.  The report outlined the following life expectancy of the assets and the current age left has been added for reference:

 

Asset

Condition and life

expectancy (2011)

Condition and life

expectancy (2018)

50m lap pool concrete control joints

 

5 years

2 years past life expectancy

50m lap pool walls, flood and metallic fittings

 

10 years

3 years

Diving pool (Program pool 3) control joints and metallic fittings

 

5 years

2 years past life expectancy

Diving pool (program pool 3) walls and floor

 

20 years

13 years

Children’s ‘mushroom’ water play pool control joints, metallic finishes gutter and grating

6 years

Upgrades complete in 2016

 

 

Both the 50m lap pool and the diving pool (program pool 3) are past their life expectancy and require construction work to ensure continued usability.

 

 

Previous LPAC Upgrades

 

In 2008 and 2016 the former Leichhardt Council completed works to program pool 1 and provided a new gym facility. The scope of these projects works included:

·    Cardio and weights area

·    Two new group fitness studios

·    Change room facilities

·    Gym area administration offices

·    New pathway connections

·    New enclosure to the existing program and spa pools

·    Refurbished pool concourses

·    Re-tiling of program pool, children’s ‘mushroom’ pool and spa pool, and upgrade of spa pool water feature

·    New separate water efficient pool filtration to program pool, spa pool and leisure pool to enhance water quality

·    New reconfigured female, male and unisex accessible change spaces – separated from existing change areas

·    Refurbishment of existing male, female and accessible change rooms, including new finishes and fixtures.

 

Works in 2008 and 2016 did not address items relating to the asset condition of the 50m lap pool or the diving pool (program pool 3).

 

Master Plan Process

 

Staff worked collaboratively with Council stakeholders and the community to develop a new master plan for LPAC.  Detailed site analysis reviewed site history, zoning, stormwater and drainage design, active transport connections, pathway and access networks, existing trees, existing parking, indigenous vegetation types, biodiversity and revegetation strategies, park furniture. The combination of site analysis and stakeholder input produced opportunities and constraints that were used to establish the master plan design strategies.  The strategies were costed to understand financial implications of proposed upgrades and the integrated into Council forward capital budget.

 

Master Plan Report Structure

 

The draft master plan document comprises the following sections:

1.   Project context: This section provides an introduction and background to the project including reference to existing Council policies, project objectives and project methodology.

2.   Site Analysis: The physical characteristics of the site area and its context are described with analysis in plan, text and images.  The focus is on the physical site, but also includes site and cultural history, sense of place and meaning to the community.

3.   Community Engagement: This section provides an overview of the community engagement process and the feedback provided by the community.

4.   Design Principles: Each of the overarching project design principles have been described.

5.   Precinct Planning: Design outcomes for the Leichhardt Park recreation precinct are outlined to better connect existing facilities.

6.   Master Plan: The master plan provides an overview of all proposed strategies to improve the experience of LPAC for staff and the community.  The master plan section has each of the design layers included for extra detail, as well as zoned in plans for each of the precincts of work.

7.   Project Costs and Implementation:  This section outlines an opinion of probable costs for the project and articulates potential staging based on asset condition and community requests.  The basis of the opinion of costs is included to understand scope and exclusions.

 

Proposed Improvements

 

The draft master plan proposes strategies that aim to improve the user experience at LPAC, while retaining items that staff the community enjoy.  Some of the master plan strategies include:

·    New nature based recreation zone with water play, toddler water play and water jet area.  The proposed design is integrated into the foreshore setting of trees and vegetation

·    Refurbished existing building (lower terrace) with community function room and hire space with outdoor seating and harbour views

·    Picnic areas with BBQs, picnic settings and turf recreation spaces

·    New unisex family change rooms

·    New 50m, 10 lane lap pool with movable boom

·    Refurbished diving pool and tower

·    Enclosing of the ‘mushroom’ children’s water play  pool area with new operable roof and sliding doors – so the facilities can be used in winter as a closed area and opened for fresh air and breezes in summer

·    Refurbished Program Pool 2 with new hand rails and ventilation

·    Provision of spectator seating overlooking the 50m lap pool, improved shade structures, outdoor showers and new planting

·    Co-location the male and female pool change rooms, toilets and showers.

·    Co-location of the fitness studios

·    Relocated cafe with expanded outdoor covered seating area

·    Relocated crèche, reception area and administration rooms

·    Renovated entry design with new landscaping and arrival sequence

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

The master plans costs have been estimated to total $15,715,270 including a 15% design budget and 20% contingency.  The plans have been developed to be implemented in stages as funding becomes available.  The cost breakdown of each stage and the associated costs includes:

 

Area of LPAC / Master Plan Strategy

Amount

Updated reception area

$     408,375.00

New administration area and meeting room fit out

$     221,751.00

Refurbish existing building, lower terrace

$     436,846.50

Recreation area and water play

$  4,143,947.85

Family change and spectator seating

$  1,200,555.00

Swimming pool upgrades (including new 50m lap pool)

$  7,314,443.37

Building and dry fitness upgrades

$  1,989,270.90

TOTAL (Excluding GST)

$15,715,189.62

 

The master plan has been integrated into the forward capital works budget.  The forward capital works budget has allowed for $5,527,700 over the following financial years:

 

Financial Year

Amount

2019/2020

$   300,000.00

2020/2021

$2,808,400.00

2021/2022

$2,419,300.00

TOTAL

$5,527,700.00

 

 

 

OTHER STAFF COMMENTS

The development of the master plan has been a highly collaborative process with input from all disciplines across Council including LPAC staff.  Regular meetings with LPAC and Council staff has meant the development of the proposal strategies have strong ownership across Council. The internal stakeholders from across Council included representatives from:

 

·    Development Assessment and Regulatory Service

·    Trees, Parks and Sportfields

·    Environment and Sustainability

·    Roads and Stormwater

·    Major Building Projects and Facilities

·    Finance

·    Strategic Planning

·    Library and History Services

·    Recreation and Aquatics, including LPAC staff

·    Community Services and Culture

·    Communications, Engagement and Events

 

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

During January and February 2018, staff undertook community engagement on the current use and future vision for the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre. The community engagement built on the previous engagement conducted by the former Leichhardt Council through Otium Planning Group.

 

The engagement included interactive sessions and an online survey at Inner West Council ‘Your Say Inner West’ website. During the five week engagement period, the online website received 1,220 visits with 428 surveys completed. The engagement sessions also received input from respondents who completed 146 paper surveys, interactive activities and had lengthy discussions with Council staff. 

 

The scope of the engagement included feedback on the facility including:

 

·    Pools (50m lap pool, driving pool, program pools)

·    Gym (including change rooms)

·    Group fitness facilities

·    Café

·    Crèche

·    Entry and administration areas

·    Open space and recreation areas

·    Pathways and circulation

·    Shade

·    Seating

 

The scope of the engagement included questions relating to the pedestrian and bicycle connections to nearby parks and residential areas including the Bay Run and Leichhardt Park. 

The feedback highlighted:

 

·    The majority of those that attend the centre like the character, however the existing facilities, including shade, seating, and recreational spaces within the centre could be improved;

·    Generally respondents noted that the facility met their fitness and recreation needs, however the 50m Olympic swimming pool was at capacity and the program pool and hydrotherapy pool required upgrading to the ventilation systems;

·    Respondents liked the diving pool for deep water aqua, but also for nostalgic purposes;

·    The gym and group fitness facilities generally met the needs of the user. However there was some concern about the maintenance of change room facilities;

·    Respondents noted that the car park was at capacity, and that the closing of the car park during events was an inconvenience;

·    Many respondents requested upgrades to the car park to remove pot holes and provide for additional parking spots; and

·    Many requested more shade options, additional informal recreation areas, additional water play areas and more recreation options for children.

 

The full summary of the community engagement including the process and the feedback received from the community is included as ATTACHMENT 1.

 

Public Exhibition

 

Public exhibition is proposed as the next phase of the master planning process.  Public exhibition will allow the community and stakeholders a further chance to input on the draft master plan to ensure the proposed strategies meet community requests.

 

The public exhibition period will be for a period of 28 days from Friday 31 August 2018 until Friday 28 September 2018.  All submissions will be reviewed with feedback integrated in an updated master plan.  The feedback will be presented back to Council in a schedule for transparency, along with the final draft master plan.  The public exhibition will be advertised via the Inner West Courier, the Your Say Inner West website, Facebook posts and Twitter.

 

 

CONCLUSION

The master plan development has followed a highly collaborative process and has established values consistent with the view of the local community, LPAC staff and stakeholders.  To ensure the plans meet the needs of community it is now appropriate for the community to again have the opportunity for input through the public exhibition process.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

Draft Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre (LPAC) Master Plan

2.

Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre (LPAC) Community Engagement Report

  


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

 


 


 


 


 

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

Item No:         C0818(3) Item 8

Subject:         Draft Marrickville Road (East) Public Domain Master Plan: Feedback from Public Exhibition           

Prepared By:     David Petrie - Coordinator Public Domain Planning  

Authorised By:  Josephine Bennett - Group Manager Recreation and Aquatics

 

SUMMARY

The Draft Marrickville Road (East) Public Domain Master Plan was on public exhibition from 15 May 2018 to 26 June 2018.  The plans received more than 94% approval from the community.  Minor changes were requested during the exhibition period and these have been included in the revised plan to better meet community needs. This report provides an overview of the revised plan, the design process and the feedback received from the community.  This report is seeking Council’s endorsement of the master plan so the plans can inform future streetscape improvements along Marrickville Road (East).

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT:

 

1.       The report be received and noted;

 

2.       Council adopts the draft Marrickville Road (East) Public Domain Master Plan (ATTACHMENT 1);

 

3.       All residents and stakeholders who made submissions during the public exhibition period be notified of Council’s determination; and

 

4.       The master plan be used to inform future capital streetscape upgrades along Marrickville Road (East).

 

 

 

 

BACKGROUND

The Public Domain Planning team has engaged across Council, with the community, businesses and State Government Agencies to develop an integrated public domain master  plan for Marrickville Road (East). 

 

The draft plan was endorsed for public exhibition at the 8 May 2018 Council meeting.  The minutes from the meeting note that:

 

1.   The draft public domain master plan for Marrickville Road East (ATTACHMENT 1) be placed on public exhibition for a period of 28 days and submissions be received for a further 14 days; and

2.   The results of the public exhibition and community engagement process are presented to Council recommending further action.

 

The plan was on exhibition for six weeks; comprised of 28 days and a further 14 days for submissions to be received.  During the exhibition period much support was received (94%)  from the community, and comments received have informed a revision of the plan to ensure the it better reflects the community’s vision for the street.

 

 

 

 

Project Scope

 

The scope of the project includes the public domain elements along Marrickville Road from Meeks Road to the intersection with Railway Parade.  The project extends along Railway Parade from Marrickville Road to Gleeson Avenue at the Sydenham Railway Station.  The project scope reviews the road intersections with Lower Railway Parade, Buckley Street, Barclay Street, Sydney Street, Gerald Street, and access into Fraser Park.  The public domain elements contained in the master plan include:

·    Pedestrian pavements

·    Pedestrian furniture including seating, rubbish bins, and bollards

·    Bicycle infrastructure including cycle lanes

·    Street cross sections including travel lanes, kerb alignment and parking

·    Kerb blisters

·    Rain-gardens and other planting locations

·    Street tree locations

·    Pedestrian and feature lighting

·    Public art strategies

 

Adjacent Public Domain Projects

 

The scope from Marrickville Road heading west from Meeks Road is included within the Marrickville Town Centre Public Domain Master Plan.  This project is still in the development phases and requires further staff collaboration and input from stakeholders before it is reported to Council by the end of the 2018.

 

Master Plan Process

 

Public Domain Planning team developed the public domain master plan by working collaboratively with Council stakeholders, businesses, the community and State Government agencies to produce an integrated public domain plan.  Detailed site analysis reviewed site history, existing and proposed zoning, stormwater and drainage design, active transport options, pavement design and quality, street trees, overhead electrical infrastructure, road ownership, (large) vehicle turning requirements, urban heat island, bicycle infrastructure options, pedestrian connections and road crossings, pedestrian furniture and public art opportunities. The combination of site analysis and stakeholder input produced opportunities and constraints that were used to establish the master plan design strategies.  The strategies were costed to understand financial implications of proposed upgrades and the integrated into Council forward capital budget.

 

Master Plan Proposals

 

The draft master plan aims to deliver a pedestrian and cyclist environment that is safe, pleasant and enjoyable to use.  The plans promote active transport and a better link between the Marrickville Town Centre and the Sydenham Railway Station.  Specific strategies to deliver this aim includes: 

·    Install new furniture elements including pedestrian seats, drink fountains, rubbish bins and bicycle racks;

·    Provide pedestrian priority threshold treatments to pedestrian crossings at road intersections;

·    Provide an additional north-south pedestrian crossing point along Marrickville Road (East);

·    Provide kerb blister enlargements at street intersections with rain-gardens in the planting areas.  The kerb alignment has been designed to facilitate turning circles for 19m rigid vehicles and any new planting to be low to maintain required sightlines at intersections;

·    New pedestrian pavements of concrete with two different textures (broom finished and shot-blast, sandblast or saw cut finishes);

·    Provide a separated bicycle lane along Marrickville Road, connecting with the regional routes to the west (Meeks Road), north (along Sydney Street and Railway Avenue);

·    Retain key existing tree specimens;

·    Replace low quality trees with new advanced trees appropriate for their location (i.e. lower spreading tree canopies below overhead electrical infrastructure; and tall and large canopies where space allows);

·    All tree plantings to have expanded tree pits or structural soil zones to maximise growing medium for trees;

·    New pedestrian lighting along the street;

·    Retain existing bus stop locations;

·    Retain existing car parking configuration and business driveway accesses;

·    Retain the existing heritage walls along Marrickville Road and Railway Parade; and

·    Use the existing wall along Marrickville Road for future public art.

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

The master plan costs have been estimated to total $4,091,118, excluding GST.  The master plan has been developed to be implemented in six stages.  The cost breakdown associated with the stages includes:

 

Stage

Amount

Stage 1A

$1,162,017

Stage 1B

$1,931,188

Stage 2

$   269,096

Stage 3

$   346,134

Stage 4

$   324,505

Stage 5

$     58,178

 

 

Total (Excluding GST)                                                                                     

$4,091,118

 

The master plan has been integrated into the forward capital works budget. The forward capital works program currently forecasts a budget allocation for the project of $1,795,000 over the following financial years:

 

Year

Amount

2018 / 2019

$    195,000

2019 / 2020

$               0

2020 / 2021

$    500,000

2021 / 2022

$ 1,100,000

TOTAL

$ 1,795,000

 

Current budget allocation allows for the implementation of stage 1A and an additional stage to the cost of approximately $450,000.  Additional budget would be sought from external funding sources such as grant applications for the additional stages of the master plan.

 

STAFF COMMENTS

The development of the master plan was a collaborative process with input from all disciplines across Council.  The feedback occurred at several times through the development of the plans, and staff comments have been integrated into the plans.  The collaborative and iterative process has been helpful in developing multifunctional infrastructure that benefits many users. The internal stakeholders across Council have included representatives from:

 

·    Development Assessment and Regulatory Service

·    Trees, Parks and Sport fields

·    Environment and Sustainability

·    Roads and Stormwater

·    Major Building Projects and Facilities

·    Finance

·    Strategic Planning

·    Library and History Services

·    Recreation and Aquatics

·    Community Services and Culture

·    Communications, Engagement and Events

 

There is support for the master plan from across Council.  The plan is spatially locating many disciplines strategies including active transport initiatives, urban tree canopy, water sensitive cities as well as giving design guidance for Roads and Stormwater for the design of the streetscape outcomes.  Roads and stormwater are ready to proceed with the next design phase for stage 1A with budget allocations for the 2018/2019 for detail design.

 

PREVIOUS COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

During February and March 2017 Council undertook community engagement with residents and businesses in Marrickville and Sydenham.  Information was disseminated to the community via a number of means including Inner West Courier, email, Council website and a letter box mail out. A total of 1440 residents and businesses received the letter box mail out, centred on the nearby streets extending north to Sydenham Road and west to Illawarra Road.  All advertising material provided details for the Inner West Council ‘Your Say Inner West’ website. The site contained information outlining key dates, an overview of the project and a link to an online survey.  The Your Say Inner West website received 100 visits to the Marrickville Road (East) survey page; and from the 100 visits, 26 surveys were completed.

 

The most commonly raised items to improve the streetscape environment from the community were:

·    Provide traffic calming measures along the street

·    Planting of shade trees and low plantings

·    Provide bicycle infrastructure including bike racks and cycle lanes

·    Additional pedestrian crossings across Marrickville Road (East)

·    Footpath surfaces need to be improved, widened to provide a safe pedestrian environment

·    Provision of pedestrian lighting along the streets

  

Additional engagement occurred with all businesses along Marrickville Road (East) during November 2017.  Each business was provided with a verbal presentation of the planning process, questioned about what they need from the streetscape to help their business succeed and was provided with Council contacts for more information. 

 

The community and business engagement information has directly influenced that strategies and plan developed for the public domain master plan.  A full summary of the feedback is included in the master plan on page 69 of ATTACHMENT 1.

 

Engagement has also occurred with external stakeholders and agencies including Sydney Buses, Department of Planning and Roads and Maritime Service.

PUBLIC EXHIBITION

During the six week period public exhibition period from 15 May 2018 to 26 June 2018, advertising material was installed at each of Council’s Service Centres and 1,500 postcards were distributed to residents and businesses to the area adjacent the master plan scope.  Advertising material highlighted the ‘Your Say Inner West’ website, which contained information about the project, copies of the report and an online survey that requested respondents to outline whether they supported the proposed plan and if they had any specific feedback. 

 

During the exhibition period the online documents received 596 visits and 57 submissions. From the 57 submission Council received 94% support for the plans. Some respondents provided comments and feedback about the streetscape improvements.   The feedback has been used to amend the plans so they better align with community sentiments.   

 

A summary of key themes from the community include:

·    Strong support for the bicycle lane along Marrickville Road (East)

·    Support for the ‘greening’ of the street with trees, WSUD elements and planting and street improvements

·    Some requests for the expansion of the plan and inclusion of additional cycle lanes and streetscape improvements elsewhere in Marrickville

·    Some respondents wanted to ensure the proposals tie into regional bicycle routes

·    Statements requested Council ensure the bicycle lane is safe and provides for other users

·    Statements requested Council ensure it has considered tree species selection and mitigated the risk of damage to infrastructure

·    Statements requested Council ensure it has considered tree species selection allows for adequate traffic and transport sightlines

·    Review of drink fountain locations

 

Most comments were positive and others reiterated processes that had already been completed in the development of the plans.  The feedback was used to review and amend the draft master plan design strategies.  The full list of submissions with Council’s comments and listed requested amendments are included as ATTACHMENT 2.

 

CONCLUSION

The draft Marrickville Road (East) Public Domain Master Plan has been developed through a collaborative process to establish the values consistent with the views of the local community and stakeholders. This has been demonstrated through the high levels of support during the public exhibition process.  The high level of community support and the amendments to the plans post exhibition to address community feedback has established a detailed 10 year plan that is consistent with the community vision and values.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

Draft Marrickville Road (East) Public Domain Master Plan

2.

Draft Marrickville Road (East) Public Domain Master Plan_ Feedback Schedule

  


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

Item No:         C0818(3) Item 9

Subject:         Events in Parks Policy & Events in Parks Guidelines           

Prepared By:     Cathy Edwards-Davis - Group Manager Trees, Parks and Sports Fields 

Authorised By:  Elizabeth Richardson - Deputy General Manager Assets and Environment

 

SUMMARY

This report is seeking Council’s endorsement of the draft Events in Parks Policy to be placed on public exhibition for 28 days, with the results presented to Council along with a final Policy for adoption.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT:

 

1.       The draft Events in Parks Policy be placed on public exhibition for a period of 28 days;

 

2.       The results of the public exhibition and community engagement process are presented to Council along with a final Events in Parks Policy for adoption; and

 

3.       The Events in Parks Guidelines be noted.

 

 

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

Council is responsible for the management of all activities within parks, reserves, sporting grounds and public open space.  There is an ongoing high demand for open space resources within the Inner West, particularly with increasing densities.  Council must actively manage access to the parks.

 

Events are fun and entertaining, and provide opportunities for large and small communities to connect and safely share enjoyable and inspiring experiences. Events can be informative, build community knowledge, and raise awareness to develop a shared understanding of social, economic or environmental issues. Events can build capability within a community, develop a sense of community spirit, identity and belonging.

 

Council encourages the use of parks for events as they help contribute to the health, wellbeing and liveability of the Inner West.  It is Council’s objective to ensure that park events are suitable and managed in a manner which is safe and which is appropriate to the local environment and surrounding community.

 

At the Council meeting on the 27 March 2018, a report on the proposed Bangla New Year’s Day Festival at Tempe Reserve was considered.  Council resolved:

 

THAT:

 

1.         The report be received and noted;

 

2.         Council immediately engage with the organisers of the festival to seek to address the objections of the police, RMS and Council officers so that the event can return to the Inner West in 2019;

 

3.         Council review and report on other festivals and events which have been hosted in the LGA previously which may be affected by similar logistical problems; and

 

4.         Council receive a briefing or report which details how council can improve engagement with community leaders and organisers of local community events

 

This report addresses the Council resolutions.

 

Bangla Festival

 

Since the Council meeting on the 27 March 2018, Council staff have attempted to contact the Event Organisers for the Bangla Festival on two occasions.  To date, they have not responded to Council.

 

Other Events

 

Council hosts a number of events in parks, including the following:

 

Date(s)

Venue

Event

Event Organiser

February (TBC)

Ashfield Park

International Mother Language Day

Ekushe Academy

23 & 24 February 2018

Leichhardt #3 - Bay Run

65k 4 65 Roses Walkathon

Cystic Fibrosis NSW

17-18 March

King George Park

Relay for Life

Cancer Council

April (TBC)

Ashfield Park

Bengali New Year

Protity House of Begali Culture in Australia

April (TBC)

Ashfield Park

Stations of Cross Services

St Vincents Parish Ashfield

Sunday, 6 May 2018

Leichhardt #3 - Bay Run

Fun Run / Walk

Alzheimer's Australia NSW 

4th & 5th August 2018

Leichhardt #3 - Bay Run

The "Bay Run"

Dobroyd Public School

Tuesday, 10 July 2018

Steel Park/ Steel Oval

AbSec NAIDOC Event

AbSec

Saturday, 28 July 2018

Henson Park

The Beer Footy And Food Festival

The Newtown Jets

Sunday, 19 August 2018

Ashfield Park

Nepalese Women's Festival Teej Mela 2

7 Ways Event (Nepalese Squad Entertainment)

Sunday, 19 August 2018

Henson Park

Reclink Community Cup

Reclink Australia

Sunday, 26 August 2018

Tempe Reserve

Gai Jatra Festival

Gorkha Samaj Australia

25 Feb/10 June/16 Dec 18

Leichhardt Park (Giovinazzo Grove)

Fun Run

Sri Marathon Team

September (TBC)

Pioneers Memorial Park

Music in the Park

SSC - Leichhardt Campus

October (TBC)

Richard Murden Reserve

Spring Cycle 2017

Bicycle NSW

Sunday, 28 October 2018

King George Park (Event Village)
Easton Park (drink station)

Seven Bridges Walk

Cancer Council

Sunday, 28 October 2018

Elkington Park

Back to Balmain Day

Committee / Council

October (TBC)

Pioneers Memorial Park

Norton Street Festa

Leichhardt/Annandale Business Chamber

October (TBC)

Water Street Reserve

Balmain Regatta

Balmain Sailing Club

Friday 2 to Sunday 4 November 2018

Tempe Reserve

MS Sydney Gong Ride

GTR Events

November (TBC)

Leichhardt #3 - Bay Run

Day at the Bay

St Merkorious Charity

Sunday, 11 November 2018

Camperdown Memorial Rest Park

Newtown Festival

Cattleyard

Various

Leichhardt Park (Giovinazzo Grove)

Fun Run

Sri Marathon Team

Sunday, 18 November 2018

King George Park - Callan Park

Balmain Fun Run

Balmain Public School

Various

Leichhardt Park (Giovinazzo Grove)

Fun Run

Sri Marathon Team

December (TBC)

Ashfield Park

Spirtual Gathering
 (Prayer Evening)

Australian Catholic
Chinese Community

December (TBC)

Easton Park

Carols on Denison

Echo Christian Community

December (TBC)

Pioneers Memorial Park

Carols on Norton

Leichhardt Expresso Chorus

 

 

These events generally have some localised impacts on the day of the event, such as traffic delays and increased demand for parking in the area immediately surrounding the event location.  Council staff work with the Event Organisers to minimise these impacts.  There are no significant safety concerns raised by Council, the Police and RMS regarding these events.

 

There are a number of Inner West Council organised events which also occur regularly in the parks.

 

Improve Engagement

 

The Council resolution calls for information on how Council can improve engagement with organisers of local community events.  This was discussed internally, including with the Communications, Engagement & Events team.  It was determined that the best means to meet this objective was to provide practical support to Event Organisers.  This is the intention of the attached draft Events in Parks Policy and the Events in Parks Guidelines. 

 

The objective of the draft policy is to assist community Event Organisers by guiding them through the approval process for events that take place in parks in the Inner West Council. 

 

The Guidelines document provides advice on the management of major events in parks in the Inner West.  Depending on the size and nature of the event, it is not intended or envisaged that all of the matters outlined in this document will apply to all events.  Event Organisers are to utilise this document as a guideline, as relevant to the individual circumstances of the event they are planning.

 

The Parks Planning & Engagement team will act as the contact point for Event Organisers who are proposing to hold an event in a park.  The Parks Planning & Engagement team will liaise with the relevant internal Council teams such as the planners and traffic engineers, on behalf of the Event Organiser.  The Event Organiser will not need to negotiate multiple approval processes through Council.  This is an improved service to the community, by offering them with a “one-stop-shop” solution for the approval of an event in a park.

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

The existing Council structure has been developed to ensure there are staff resources to assist Event Organisers with the approval process for an event in a park.

 

 

OTHER STAFF COMMENTS

The following teams have had input into the development of the draft Policy & Guidelines:  Communications, Engagement & Events; Community Services & Culture; Customer Service; Footpaths, Roads, Traffic & Stormwater; Development Assessment & Regulatory Services; and Environment & Sustainability.

 

 

 

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

It is recommended that the draft Policy be placed on public exhibition.  An email will be sent to Event Organisers who have previously had events in parks in the Inner West, to alert them to the draft Policy being on exhibition.

 

CONCLUSION

The objective of the draft policy is to assist community Event Organisers by guiding them through the approval process for events that take place in parks in the Inner West Council.  The Event in Parks Guidelines provides guidance on the management of major events in parks.

 

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

Draft Events in Parks Policy

2.

Draft Events in Parks Guidelines

  


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

Events in Parks

Policy

 

 

 

 

 

https://cdn.eventfinda.com.au/uploads/events/transformed/410572-164654-14.jpg 



Events in Parks Policy

 

 

Title

Events in Parks Policy

Summary

The purpose of this policy is to assist community Event Organisers by guiding them through the approval process for events that take place in parks in the Inner West Council. 

 

Background

Council encourages the use of parks for events as they help contribute to the health, wellbeing and liveability of the Inner West.  It is Council’s objective to ensure that park events are suitable and managed in a manner which is safe and which is appropriate to the local environment and surrounding community.

 

Policy Type

Council Policy

Relevant Strategic Plan Objective

Strategic direction 4: Caring, happy, healthy communities

Outcome 4.1 Everyone feels welcome and connected to the community

1.   Foster inclusive communities where everyone can participate in community life

Outcome 4.3 The community is healthy and people have a sense of wellbeing:

1.   Provide the facilities, spaces and programs that support wellbeing and healthy communities

 

Relevant Council References

Events in Parks Guidelines

Sporting Grounds Allocations Policy

Park Access Application

Park Plans of Management

Event Invitation and Speaking Policy

LAP Waste Management in Public Places Policy

 

Main Legislative Or Regulatory Reference

Local Government Act

Applicable Delegation Of Authority

As per Delegations Register

Attachments

See Annexures

Record Notes

External available document

 

Document:

Council Policy

Uncontrolled Copy When Printed

Custodian:

Parks Planning & Engagement Manager

Version #

1

Approved By:

Group Manager Trees, Parks & Sportsfields

TRIM Ref #

 

Adopted By: 

Council

Publish Location

Internet

Adopted Date and Minute #:

Xx / xx / xx

Next Review Date

XX / XX / xX


 

Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents. 3

1.      Purpose. 4

2.      Objective. 4

3.      Scope. 4

3.1.           In scope. 4

3.2.           Out of scope. 5

Sporting Grounds Allocation Policy. 5

Commercial Fitness Trainers Policy. 5

Park Access for Works. 5

Filming in Parks. 5

Busking. 5

4.      Policy Statement 5

5.      Policy. 6

5.1.           Selecting a Park Venue. 6

5.2.           Event Size. 6

Park Casual Event (less than 30 people) 6

Park Minor Events (up to 500 people) 6

Park Major Events (greater than 500 people) 6

6.      Park Major Event Approval Process. 7

6.1.           Park Event Booking and Approval by Council’s Parks Planning & Engagement team   7

6.2.           Planning Approval by Council’s Development Assessment & Regulatory Services team (where needed) 7

7.      Park Event Fees. 9

8.      Fee Waiver 9

9.      Damage Bonds. 10

10.        Related Legislation, Policies and Procedures. 11

11.        Appeal Process. 11

Council 12

12.        Responsibilities. 12

Annexure 1 - Park Event Conditions. 14

Annexure 2 – Parks & Facilities Which May be Booked. 21

 

 


 

1.  Purpose

 

The purpose of this policy is to assist community Event Organisers by guiding them through the approval process for events that take place in parks in the Inner West Council.

 

A separate document, Events in Parks Guidelines provides guidance on the management of major events in parks.

 

 

2.  Objective

 

Council is responsible for the management of all activities within parks, reserves, sporting grounds and public open space.  There is an ongoing high demand for open space resources within the Inner West, particularly with increasing densities.  Council must actively manage access to the parks.

 

Events are fun and entertaining, and provide opportunities for large and small communities to connect and safely share enjoyable and inspiring experiences. Events can be informative, build community knowledge, and raise awareness to develop a shared understanding of social, economic or environmental issues. Events can build capability within a community, develop a sense of community spirit, identity and belonging.

 

Council encourages the use of parks for events as they help contribute to the health, wellbeing and liveability of the Inner West.  It is Council’s objective to ensure that park events are suitable and managed in a manner which is safe and which is appropriate to the local environment and surrounding community.

 

Many events in the Inner West take place with little involvement from Council.  Apart from granting permits to hold the activity in public spaces, Council contributes to events in the following ways:

 

·    Provide strategic direction for events

·    Deliver events

·    Facilitate event planning through Council processes

·    Manage the impact of events on local communities and the environment (e.g. noise, traffic, waste)

·    Process consents, permits and licences required to hold events

·    Promote the health and safety of all who attend an event and the community near an event

·    Monitor compliance with regulatory and licensing requirements

·    Provide venues for staging events

·    Market and promote events in which we have invested

 

 

3.  Scope

 

3.1.      In scope

 

This policy applies to proposed events occurring in parks, reserves and sporting grounds, either owned by Council or under its control and management (e.g. Crown Land).  These events are usually single one-off events, such as parties, celebrations, corporate events, charity events, fun runs and community festivals.

 

3.2.      Out of scope

 

Sporting Grounds Allocation Policy

 

This Policy does not apply to seasonal bookings for sports training and games on sporting grounds, usually hired by sporting clubs, universities and schools.

 

Commercial Fitness Trainers Policy

 

This policy does not apply to commercial fitness trainers and commercial running groups who use Council sporting grounds and parks for training.

 

Park Access for Works

 

This Policy does not apply to applications for park access for non-recreation purposes such as works within the park or access through a park to adjacent properties for works or deliveries.  Applications for park access are available on Council’s website (https://www.innerwest.nsw.gov.au/ArticleDocuments/20858/Parks%20access%20application%20form.pdf.aspx)

 

Filming in Parks

 

This Policy does not apply to applications for filming in parks.  Applications for filming are available on Council’s website (https://www.innerwest.nsw.gov.au/places---spaces/filming-and-photography)

 

Busking

 

This Policy does not apply to applications for busking.  Applications for busking are available on Council’s website (https://www.innerwest.nsw.gov.au/art---events/arts-and-culture/performing-arts-and-music/busking)

 

NSW Government Events

 

This Policy does not apply to State Government events such as the New Year’s Eve celebration.  For large state events, Council is not the Event Organiser.  Council’s responsibility is to collaborate with the NSW Police and other stakeholders to ensure public safety at key gathering points.

 

Parks Managed by the State Government

 

This Policy does not apply to parks owned and managed by the State Government, including Callan Park and Ballast Point Park.

 

 

4.  Policy Statement

 

Council encourages the use of parks for events as they help contribute to the health, wellbeing and liveability of the Inner West.  It is Council’s objective to ensure that park events are suitable and managed in a manner which is safe and which is appropriate to the local environment and surrounding community.

 

This policy is to assist community Event Organisers by guiding them through the approval process for events that take place in parks in the Inner West Council. 

 

A separate document, Events in Parks Guidelines provides guidance on the management of major events in parks.

 

 

5.  Policy

 

5.1.      Selecting a Park Venue

 

Council’s Parks Planning & Engagement team manage all activities within the parks.  It is their responsibility to ensure that different activity requests are managed for both active and passive recreation, to ensure that there is access for multiple park users and to ensure that a single space is not booked by multiple users at the same time.

 

For any proposed event, the first step is to contact Council’s Parks Planning & Engagement team (parks@innerwest.nsw.gov.au or 02 9392 5311) to ensure that the preferred park venue is suitable and that the proposed date for the event is available.

 

When selecting a park venue for an event, consideration should be given to the following:

·    Suitability of the event in the preferred location.  It is suggested to all hirers that a site inspection is conducted before booking the venue (without Council Staff);

·    Expected number of attendees;

·    How participants will travel to the venue (are there public transport options, is there enough parking);

·    Surrounding facilities (e.g. toilets);

·    Waste management;

·    Impact on surrounding residents;

·    Fees and charges for event hire (i.e. budget).

 

When booking the event venue, allow time for set up and pack down time.

 

 

5.2.      Event Size

 

Park Casual Event (less than 30 people)

 

Casual use of parks is permitted, for up to 30 people, without approval from Council subject to the conditions outlined in Annexure 1 - Park Event Conditions. 

 

If hirers want to use a space in a Council park exclusively (e.g. Elkington Park Rotunda), it is recommended that a booking is made.  If a location is booked by another group, they will have priority of use.

 

Park Minor Events (up to 500 people)

 

Minor events in parks are permitted, for up to 500 people, subject to the submission of an Casual Park and Sporting Ground Hire Form (available on Council’s website) and conditions outlined in Annexure 1 - Park Event Conditions.  For minor events in parks, the Casual Park and Sporting Ground Hire Form must be submitted to Council at least four weeks in advance.

 

Park Major Events (greater than 500 people)

 

Any event in a park with greater than 500 people is considered a major event.  This document will guide Event Organisers on the approval process and provide advice on the management of major events in parks in the Inner West.

 

A separate document, Events in Parks Guidelines provides guidance on the management of major events in parks.

 

 

6.  Park Major Event Approval Process

 

There is a two-step approval process for Park Major Events:

 

1.   Park Event booking and approval by Council’s Parks Planning & Engagement team; and

2.   Planning Approval by Council’s Development Assessment & Regulatory Services team (where needed, see below).

 

6.1.      Park Event Booking and Approval by Council’s Parks Planning & Engagement team

 

For any proposed event, the first step is to contact Council’s Parks Planning & Engagement team (parks@innerwest.nsw.gov.au or 02 9392 5000) to ensure that the preferred park venue is suitable and that the proposed date for the event is available.

 

Correct site selection is a critical success factor for an event. The site you select should match your expectations of size, location and available facilities. Crowd and infrastructure capacities vary depending on the chosen site with only some being easily accessible and in close proximity to transport.

 

When selecting a park venue, consideration should be given to the expected number of attendees, and how participants will travel to the venue.  When booking the event venue, allow time for set up and pack down time.

 

Various sports clubs, schools and other park users hire the parks and sporting grounds on a seasonal or casual basis.  Where a proposed park event coincides with seasonal sporting club usage or another regular park booking, priority will be given to the prior or regular booking.  Council may approve alternative dates or venues, subject to bookings, ground conditions and proposed use.

 

The Park Event booking and approval of all events within parks is at the sole discretion of Council as the land owner/ manager.  Park Event booking and approval will not be provided if the park venue is not suitable and/ or the proposed date is not available.  If Park Event booking and approval has been granted and if required, the Group Manager Trees, Parks & Sportsfields will sign Owner’s Consent for any Section 68 Application or Development Application. 

 

Major events are subject to the submission of an Casual Park and Sporting Ground Hire Form (available on Council’s website) and conditions outlined in Annexure 1 - Park Event Conditions.

 

 

 

 

6.2.      Planning Approval by Council’s Development Assessment & Regulatory Services team (where needed)

 

Depending on the type and size of the proposed event, it may require a planning approval, through a Section 68 Application or a Development Application (DA). 

 

It is the responsibility of the Event Organiser to submit all relevant documentation to Council for a Section 68 Application or a Development Application. The DA process is a separate process to the Park Event Approval and approval and is received and assessed by the Development Assessment team in Council. Where a DA is required, development consent, if granted, will be issued by the Council’s Development Assessment & Regulatory Services Service team, in addition to the Park Event Approval.

 

If a Section 68 Application or Development Application is required, the application must be submitted to Council at least six months in advance. The Event Organiser must book the Park before either of these applications are submitted.

 

The following table provides a guide to which approval is needed for events. The table is indicative only as requirements will depend on the type and scale of event.

 

Park Minor and Major Event Types

Park Event Booking and Approval

Section 68

Development Application

Wedding with:

·    Maximum 120 people

·    No sound amplifiers

x

 

 

Event with:

·    Up to 500 people

·    Catering

·    No sound amplifiers

·    Minimal impact to park users or residents

x

 

 

Event with:

·    Over 500 people

·    Stalls

·    Sound amplifiers

·    Impact to park users or residents

x

x

 

Sporting activities (other than a fun run/ walk) with under 1,000 people

x

 

 

Sporting activities (other than a fun run/ walk) with over 1,000 people

x

x

 

Fun run/ walk with under 5,000 people on site at any one time. With exempt development under the SEPP. 

Sound amplification permitted with approval from Building Certification Building Certification Manager (or equivalent senior role).

x

 

 

Fun run/ walk with over 5,000 people on site at any one time

x

x

 

Events which are:

·    For trade or business, including the sale of goods

·    Subject to an admission fee

·    For commercial activities (where permissible)

 

See also Council’s Mobile Food Vending Policy

x

x

 

Events at sites listed on the State Heritage Register

x

x

 

Stand alone stalls/ food trucks

 

See also Council’s Mobile Food Vending Policy

x

x

 

Large scale community events and park festivals including repeat annual events

x

x

 

Council run community events and park festivals including repeat annual events

x

x

 

Corporate promotion with minimal impact

x

 

 

Outdoor movies for less than 1,000 people

x

x

 

 

Some activities associated with events may be exempt from a Planning Approval through the State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008.  A Park Event Booking and Approval will still be required.

 

 

7.  Park Event Fees

 

Park event fees will apply.  Further information is available on Council’s website in the Inner West Fees & Charges document.

 

If the event requires Planning Approval by Council’s Development Assessment & Regulatory Services team there is a further fee to lodge the application.

 

The Event Organisers are responsible for all operational costs associated with conducting their event.

 

 

8.  Fee Waiver

 

Council may issue a fee waiver for certain events to eligible applicants.  An application will need to be submitted (https://www.innerwest.nsw.gov.au/ArticleDocuments/208/Reduced%20Fee%20Waiver%20Form%20%20-%20Leichhardt.pdf.aspx)

 

Council will accept proposals for projects, programs, events, and activities that provide a benefit to the local community. Proposals must meet the selection criteria below. Council will give priority to projects where it can be shown that the project:

·    Meets community needs or aspirations

·    Is a priority for the local community

·    Is aligned with Council’s strategic plans.

 

In addition the applicant must:

·    Be capable of carrying out the proposed project or activity

·    Need Council’s support for the project to go ahead.

 

Who can apply?

 

To be eligible to apply applicants must be:

·    A not-for-profit organisation that is based in and/or which services the local area OR

·    A community group that is based in the local area OR

·    A peer support group, for example Alcoholics Anonymous, that has a majority of local participants

 

In addition all applicants must:

·    Be proposing a project or activity principally for the benefit of residents of the Inner West Council

·    Have completed a Causal Park and Sporting Ground Hire form

·    Have completed a Reduced Fees and Fee Waiver Application Form and provided support material as requested

·    Have no outstanding debts to Inner West Council.

 

Who cannot apply?

 

The following groups and types of activities are not eligible to apply for reduced fees or fee waivers and must pay 100 per cent of the applicable fee.

·    Commercial organisations/sole traders

·    Fundraising events are generally not eligible. However, they may be supported if they are considered a high priority for the local community. This will be determined on a case-by-case basis and will take into account other eligibility requirements, the nature of the event, and the benefits to the local community of supporting the event

·    Political parties, or activities that are overtly political in nature

·    Regular, organised sporting activities/ events carried out by sporting clubs, sporting groups or associations.

·    Religious services or activities that are overtly religious in nature

·    Schools, tertiary institutions, school Parents and Friends Associations and school Parents and Citizens Associations

·    State or federal government agencies /departments.

 

Notwithstanding that Council may grant a fee waivers, the following fees will apply to all events:

·    Damage bonds

·    Key deposits

·    Supply of waste and recycling receptacles and removal of waste

·    Electricity use

 

All applications are assessed against the eligibility and selection criteria, and Council’s Strategic Plans by staff with relevant expertise.  Recommendations are then presented for approval to:

 

·    Council (for fee waivers over $4,000 in value)

·    The General Manager’s delegate (for fee waivers less than $4,000)

 

 

 

 

 

9.  Damage Bonds

 

Payment of a damage bond will be required, prior to the event.

 

All damage to Council property, either deliberate or accidental should be reported to Council as soon as possible, outlining full details of the incident.

 

The Event Organiser must meet with Council’s Parks Engagement Officer on the closest working day before the event for a site handover and the next working day after the event for a formal site back.

 

After the event, the site is to be returned to the same condition as it was in prior to the event.  Clean-up must be within two hours to prevent litter spread or within a practicable timeframe dependent on the size of the event (whichever is the lesser).  In the event that the Event Organiser does not hand back the site in the same condition, Council will clean and repair the venue to the standard required by Council at the Event Organiser’s cost.

 

The damage bond may also be utilised to cover any costs incurred by Council during the event, including the cost of monitoring the event for compliance with conditions of consent and/or legislative requirements as a consequence of carrying out the event.

 

 

10.    Related Legislation, Policies and Procedures

 

The following are related legislation, policies and procedures:

 

·    Inner West Council Events in Parks Guidelines

·    Inner West Council Sporting Grounds Allocation Policy

·    Inner West Council Park Use & Access Guidelines

·    Inner West Council Fees & Charges

·    Inner West Mobile Food Vending Policy

·    Inner West Council Inclusion Access Plan

·    Local Government Filming Protocol

·    Inner West Council Events Policy

·    Local Government Act 1993 (NSW)

·    Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 (NSW)

·    State Environmental Planning Policies

·    Local Environment Plans

·    Development Control Plans

·    Food Act 2003 (NSW)

·    Food Regulation 2015 (NSW)

·    Food Standards Code

·    Liquor Act 2007 (NSW)

·    Building Code of Australia

·    Smoke-Free Environment Act 2000 (NSW)

·    Smoke-Free Environment Regulation 2016 (NSW)

·    Callan Park (Special Provisions) Act 2002 (NSW)

·    Roads Act 1993 (NSW)

 

 

11.    Appeal Process

 

Should an Event Organiser be dissatisfied with the outcome of their application for a Park Event, the following appeal process will be followed:

 

The Event Organiser is to lodge a written appeal, outlining their reasons for appealing.  The Parks Planning & Engagement staff will review the appeal and advise the Event Organiser of:

·    The outcome of the appeal and any action taken;

·    The reason/s for the decision;

·    The proposed remedy or resolution/s that will be put in place (if needed); and

·    Any options for review

 

Should the Event Organiser still be unhappy with the outcome of the application, they may lodge a second written appeal, further outlining their reasons for appealing.  The second appeal, along with the results of the first appeal will go to the Group Manager Trees, Parks & Sportsfields to review.  The Group Manager Trees, Parks & Sportsfields will make a recommendation to the Deputy General Manager Assets and Environment regarding the allocation.

 

The Deputy General Manager will respond to the Event Organiser with the following:

 

·    The outcome of the appeal and any action taken;

·    The reason/s for the decision; and

·    The proposed remedy or resolution/s that will be put in place (if needed).

 

The elected Councillors will play no part in the event application appeal process.

 

Council

 

The elected Councillors may only overturn a staff event application determination through a resolution of Council via a Notice of Motion to Council.

 

 

12.    Responsibilities

 

Trees, Parks & Sportsfields staff are responsible for the following:

·    Reviewing and approving events in parks in accordance with Events in Parks Policy

·    Providing advice and assistance to Event Organisers

·    Reviewing and approving fee waiver requests, if appropriate

·    Reviewing appeals, as needed

·    Reviewing and revising this Events in Parks Policy when required.  Substantive changes must go to Council for approval (this does not include minor administrative updates)

·    Being the nominated Council point of contact for Event Organisers and liaising with other responsible sections of Council as required and as listed below.

 

Development Assessment and Regulatory Services staff are responsible for the following:

·    Assessing Section 68 and Development Applications in accordance with the relevant legislation

·    Undertaking regulatory inspections, including food inspections, if needed

 

Footpaths, Roads, Traffic and Stormwater staff are responsible for the following:

·    Assessing Traffic & Pedestrian Management Plans

·    Referring proposed traffic changes to the Traffic Committee, if needed

 

Environment and Sustainability staff are responsible for the following:

·    Assessment of the waste management plan

·    Providing waste and recycling services, when paid for by the Event Organiser.

 

Customer Service staff are responsible for processing park event fees and damage bonds.

 

Approval for any event in a park which is not in accordance with the Events in Parks Policy will require approval through a Council resolution.

 

 

Version

Amended By

Changes Made

Date

TRIM #

1

Group Manager Trees, Parks & Sportsfields

New IWC Policy

July 2018

 

2

 

 

 

 

 


 

Annexure 1 - Park Event Conditions

 

 

 

Condition Applies to

Number

Condition Description

Park Casual Events (<30 people)

Park Minor Events (<500 people)

Park Major Events (>500 people)

1

Park events may not occur where another group has a park booking (seasonal or casual).

 

ü

ü

ü

2

Groups who have made a park booking through Council take priority over those who have not made a booking.

 

ü

 

 

3

The hirer shall only use the parks during their allocated park booking times. The following hours of use guidelines apply to park bookings:

Parks can be booked for non-sporting activities from 8am to 6pm and 8am to 8pm during daylight savings hours (unless given special permission).

 

 

ü

ü

4

Casual sporting events may not occur on any of Council’s sporting grounds including: Algie Park, Arlington Recreation Reserve, Ashfield Park, Balmain Road (Callan Park), Birchgrove Oval, Blackmore Oval, Camdenville Oval , Camperdown Oval, Centenary Park, Cohen Park, Easton Park, Glover Street (Callan Park), Hammond Park, Henson Park, HJ Mahoney Memorial Reserve, King George Park, Leichhardt Oval # 2, Leichhardt Oval # 3, Mackey Park, Marrickville Park, Petersham Oval, Pratten Park, SSC Leichhardt Campus, Steel Park and Tempe Recreation Reserve, Waterfront Drive (Callan Park).

 

ü

 

 

5

The following activities require an approval from Council and may not be undertaken as a park casual event:

·    The use of sports grounds by sporting organisations;

·    Engaging in any trade or business, commercial and/ or profit based activities;

·    Collecting any monies;

·    Filming;

·    Wedding ceremonies;

·    Selling alcohol;

·    Consuming alcohol in prohibited areas;

·    Installing any structure, screen, awning, sign or enclosure;

·    Exhibiting or distributing advertisements or handbills;

·    Fly drones or model aircraft;

·    Driving vehicles off marked vehicle areas or parking areas;

·    Play any musical instrument, sing, direct or procure any musical performances for a fee or reward;

·    The use of any public address (PA) system or electronically operated sound equipment;

·    Any use that brings in a third party supplier, including amusement devices, formal catering, etc.

 

ü

 

 

6

Written approval must be obtained from Council.  An application must be made to Council at least four weeks in advance.

 

 

ü

 

7

The hire of sporting grounds to be considered only after seasonal sporting club and school use has been determined. Council may approve alternative dates or venues, subject to bookings, ground conditions and proposed use.

 

 

ü

ü

8

Fees and charges apply (see Council’s website).

 

 

ü

ü

9

All bookings are to be paid in full in advance of the event/ use of facilities.

 

 

ü

ü

10

Bonds may be withheld if terms and conditions of park hire are not adhered to.

 

 

ü

ü

11

Bonds may be utilised to cover any costs incurred by Council during the event, including the cost of monitoring the event for compliance with conditions of consent and/or legislative requirements as a consequence of carrying out the event.

 

 

ü

ü

12

The amount listed in the fees and charges is a minimum bond only. The Group Manager Trees, Parks & Sportsfields may increase the bond amount if the use is deemed to be a higher risk activity.

 

 

ü

ü

13

Costs will apply where Council incurs additional costs to:

·    provide a requested service; or

·    is required to clean up rubbish or pick up litter from a park, sporting grounds or change/ amenity building; or

·    empty full public park bins as a result of the event; or

·    repair unreasonable damage after use.

 

 

ü

ü

14

The Event Manager shall ensure that all damage to Council property, either deliberate or accidental is reported to Council as soon as possible, outlining full details of the incident.

 

 

ü

ü

15

An after-hours callout fee applies where council is required to attend the park to assist the hirer with matters such as access. Fees will be on a cost recovery basis. A minimum of 4 hours of staff overtime will be payable.

 

 

ü

ü

16

After the event, the site is to be returned to the same condition as it was in prior to the event.  In the event that the Event Organiser does not make good the venue, Council will clean and repair the venue to the standard required by Council at the Event Organiser’s cost.

 

 

ü

ü

17

Booking cancellations will incur an administration fee plus any additional costs incurred by the Council as result of the hire.

 

 

ü

ü

18

Council will not refund any fees and charges for booking cancellations less than 7 days prior to the event.

 

 

ü

 

19

The park is hired in the condition as is.  There may be works occurring in the park at the time.  The Event Organiser is responsible for inspecting the site.  Council takes no responsibility for the condition of the park and will not refund any fees and charges.

 

 

ü

ü

20

The Event Organisers are responsible for all operational costs associated with conducting their event.

 

 

ü

ü

21

A Certificate of Currency for public liability insurance of a minimum of $20 million must be submitted to Inner West Council.  The policy must indicate that Inner West Council is noted as an Interested Party (Principal Indemnity Endorsement), and that the Business Activity shown on the Certificate of Currency must be appropriate for the organiser’s function, such as organising and running a community festival.

 

 

ü

ü

22

No public address (PA) system or electronically operated sound equipment shall be used unless approved by Council.  Sound levels must not exceed LAeq 15 minute ≤ 65 dB(A) when measured at the nearest affected receiver (resident or business). 

 

 

ü

ü

23

No temporary structures, amusement devices (e.g. jumping castles, temporary rides), equipment or stalls shall be placed within a park, unless approved by Council in writing. 

 

 

ü

ü

24

No alcohol is permitted for sale at events in parks without a valid liquor licence and written Council approval. 

 

 

ü

ü

25

The collection of monies and/or selling of goods, including an entry/ admission fee shall not be allowed within the confines of the park unless approved by Council in writing.

 

 

ü

ü

26

The Event Organiser must ensure that the venue and the surrounding area is maintained in a clean and tidy condition throughout the event, including the bump-in and bump-out phases.

 

 

ü

ü

28

Waste and recycling receptacles must have clear bin signs consistent with the NSW Environment Protection Authorities (EPA) standard away from home signage.

 

 

ü

ü

29

Smoking is not permitted in the following areas:

Within any structures;

·    Within 10 metres of children’s play equipment in outdoor public places;

·    Spectator areas at sports grounds or other recreational areas used for organised sporting events;

·    Within 10 metres of a food fair stall.

 

ü

ü

ü

30

Access to the venue must be maintained for emergency vehicles and/or owners/tenants of properties requiring access.

 

ü

ü

ü

31

A minimum of 2.5 metres width must be maintained for pedestrian access at all times.

 

ü

ü

ü

32

A Tree Protection Plan is to be submitted to and approved by Council prior to the event.

 

 

 

ü

33

All temporary structures (including stalls, toilets, refrigeration units, generators etc.) are to be placed outside the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) of any tree.

 

 

ü

ü

34

Tree protection measures shall be implemented and complied with for the duration of the event including site preparation and pack up.

 

 

ü

ü

35

Tree pruning is not permitted in any park/open space.

 

ü

ü

ü

36

Trench digging is not permitted in any park/open space.

 

ü

ü

ü

37

No signs or other structures are to be attached to trees or Council signage.

 

ü

ü

ü

38

Vehicles are not permitted to enter parks without prior written approval from Council.

 

 

ü

ü

39

Authorised vehicles driving in the park must not exceed walking pace and must have hazard lights on.

 

 

ü

ü

40

Authorised Vehicles are not permitted to drive on grassed areas within the venue unless turf protection measures such as temporary protective boards or flooring or similar measures are used.

 

 

ü

ü

41

No vehicle shall be parked within the confines of the venue during the event unless approved by Council.

 

 

ü

ü

42

Vehicles are not permitted to drive or park beneath the dripline of any tree within the venue under any circumstances.

 

ü

ü

ü

43

The following activities are not permitted within parks at any time: archery; golf; go karting (or using other motorised equipment); paintball; laser tag; riding horses; driving of model cars; sale or use of glass receptacles; camping or lodging overnight; possession or utilisation of any firearms; coal BBQs; lighting candles; lighting fires (this excludes utilising the Council provided BBQs).

 

ü

ü

ü

44

Balloons, plastic straws, glitter, party poppers, confetti and Colour Runs are not permitted within parks at any time.

 

ü

ü

ü

45

Plans/incentives to minimise single use packaging including coffee cups, plates and cutlery.

 

ü

ü

46

Council does not take park bookings for New Year’s Eve.

 

 

ü

ü

47

Council only permits weddings ceremonies in Parks (not wedding receptions).

 

 

ü

ü

48

An Event Approval must be obtained from Council.  As much notice as possible must be given as other planning approvals (Section 68 or Development Application) may apply. 

 

 

 

ü

49

If a Section 68 or Development Application is required, an application must be made to Council six months in advance.

 

 

ü

ü

50

Generally, Council will only approve one major event per quarter per park (this does not include leases, licences and seasonal sports grounds bookings).

 

 

 

ü

51

Council will not refund any fees and charges for booking cancellations less than 14 days prior to the event.

 

 

 

ü

52

Grass must be protected through the use of temporary protective boards or flooring to protect all high traffic areas including stalls, food, beverage and merchandise sale areas.

 

 

ü

ü

53

All structures must be weighted and not pegged.

 

 

ü

ü

54

When using water-weighted structures, water weights must be pre-filled and cannot be emptied onto the grass.

 

 

ü

ü

55

The Event Organiser is responsible for compiling any event plans required by Council.  The size and nature of the event will determine if the Event Organiser must undertake the following, for approval by Council:

·    Prepare and implement a Traffic Management Plan

·    Prepare and implement a Risk Assessment and Management Plan

·    Prepare and implement an Emergency Management Plan

·    Provide security staff

·    Undertake community notification of the event

·    Install temporary fencing around the perimeter of the event

·    Prepare and implement an Alcohol Plan

·    Provide a drinking fountain or drinking tap

·    Install Variable Message Signs in advance of the event

·    Prepare and implement a First Aid Plan and provide first aid staff

·    Provide toilet facilities (in addition to existing park public toilets)

·    Prepare and implement a Waste and Litter Management Plan

·    Install “No Smoking” signs throughout the venue

 

 

ü

ü

56

The Event Manager is responsible for the satisfactory conduct of all person attending their event.  The Event Manager shall ensure that the amenity of property owners adjoining parks is not disturbed by excessive noise, offensive language, poor behaviour or any other activity likely to cause unreasonable disturbance. 

 

 

ü

ü

57

In consideration of the event details, Council at its sole discretion may apply additional conditions of approval, as deemed necessary.

 

ü

ü

 

 

The Events in Parks Guidelines provides further guidance around some of these conditions.

 

 


 

Annexure 2 – Parks & Facilities Which May be Booked

 

The following is a list of parks and facilities which may be booked:

 

 

36th Battalion Park

Leichhardt

*

Algie Park

Croydon

 

Allman Park

Ashfield

*

Arlington Recreation Reserve

Dulwich Hill

*

Ashfield Park

Ashfield

 

Badu Park

Annandale

*

Balmain Road Sporting Ground (Callan Park)

Lilyfield

 

Bill Peters Reserve

Ashfield

*

Birchgrove Park

Birchgrove

 

Birrung Park

Balmain

*

Blackmore Park

Leichhardt

 

Bridgewater Park (including picnic area)

Rozelle

*

Camdenville Park

St Peters

 

Camperdown Memorial Rest Park

Newtown

*

Camperdown Park

Camperdown

*

Centenary Sportsground

Croydon

*

Cohen Park

Annandale

 

College Street Playground

Balmain

 

Cooks River Foreshore

Marrickville

 

Darrell Jackson Gardens

Summer Hill

*

Easton Park

Rozelle

 

Elkington Park

Balmain

 

Enmore Park

Marrickville

 

Evan Jones Playground

Leichhardt

 

Ewenton Park

Balmain

 

Gladstone Park

Balmain

*

Glover Street Sporting Ground (Callan Park)

Lilyfield

 

Goodsir Street Reserve

Rozelle

*

HJ Mahoney Memorial Reserve

Marrickville

*

Hammond Park

Ashfield

 

Hawthorne Canal Reserve

Leichhardt

*

Henson Park

Marrickville

 

Hinsby Park

Annandale

 

Hoskins Park

Dulwich Hill

 

Illoura Reserve

Balmain East

 

J.F. Laxton Reserve

Dulwich Hill

 

Jack Shanahan Reserve

Dulwich Hill

 

Jarvie Park

Marrickville

 

Johnson Park

Dulwich Hill

 

Kendrick Park

Tempe

*

King George Park

Rozelle

 

 

 

*

Leichhardt #2

Lilyfield

*

Leichhardt #3

Lilyfield

 

Leichhardt Park - (Giovinazzo Grove)

Lilyfield

 

Leichhardt Park - (Peace Grove)

Lilyfield

 

Lewis Herman Reserve

Ashfield

 

Lookes Avenue Reserve

Balmain East

*

Mackey Park

Marrickville

 

Marr Reserve

Leichhardt

*

Marrickville Park

Marrickville

 

McNeilly Park

Marrickville

 

Montague Gardens

Stanmore

 

Mort Bay Park

Birchgrove

 

Morton Park

Dulwich Hill

 

O'Connor Reserve

Rozelle

 

O'Dea Reserve

Camperdown

 

Origlass Park

Balmain East

 

Paringa Reserve

Balmain

 

Peacock Point

Balmain East

*

Petersham Park

Petersham

 

Pioneers Memorial Park

Leichhardt

*

Pratten Park

Ashfield

 

Propeller Park

Balmain East

 

Punch Park

Balmain

 

Richard Murden Reserve

Haberfield

 

Robson Park

Haberfield

 

Shields Playground

Leichhardt

 

Simmons Point Reserve

Balmain East

 

Simpson Park

St Peters

 

Smith Hogan Spindlers Park

Annandale

*

Steel Park

Marrickville

 

Sydenham Green

Sydenham

 

Tempe Lands – Village Green

Tempe

*

Tempe Reserve

Tempe

 

Thornton Park

Balmain East

 

Tillman Park

Sydenham

 

Wangal Nura Park

Leichhardt

 

War Memorial Park

Leichhardt

*

Waterfront Drive Sporting Ground (Callan Park)

Lilyfield

 

Weekley Park

Stanmore

 

Whites Creek Valley Park

Lilyfield

 

Wicks Park

Marrickville

 

Yeo Park

Ashfield

 

Yurulbin Park

Birchgrove

* Note: for sporting grounds located within a Park – priority will be given to sporting club bookings

 

 

The following skate parks may be booked:

·    Darrell Jackson Gardens

·    Dulwich Hill Skate Park

·    Sydenham Green

·    Whites Creek Valley Park

 

The following rotundas may be booked:

·    Elkington Park

·    Camperdown Park

·    Petersham Park

 

All other Council picnic areas (included shelters) cannot be booked and may be utilised on a first come first use basis

 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

Events in Parks

Guidelines

 

 

 

 

 

 

https://cdn.eventfinda.com.au/uploads/events/transformed/410572-164654-14.jpg 


 


Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents. 2

1.      Introduction. 4

2.      Traditional Welcome to Country. 4

2.1.           Traditional Welcome to Country. 4

2.2.           Acknowledging Traditional Custodians. 4

3.      Event Organiser 5

4.      Event Plan. 5

4.1.           Overview Section. 5

4.2.           Event Running Sheet 6

4.3.           Contact List 6

4.4.           Other Event Plan Items. 6

5.      Event History. 7

6.      Stakeholder Meeting. 7

7.      Insurance. 7

8.      Counter Terrorism Crowded Places Security Audit & Self-Assessment Tool 7

9.      Traffic & Pedestrian Management Plan. 8

10.        Accessibility. 9

11.        Risk Assessment & Management Plan. 9

12.        Emergency Management Plan. 11

13.        Work Health and Safety. 11

14.        Security & Crowd Control 11

15.        Community Notification. 12

16.        Wet Weather Contingency. 12

17.        Entertainment and Noise Management 13

18.        Site Plan, Temporary Structures, Equipment and Stalls. 13

19.        Tree Management and Protection Plan. 14

19.1.         General Tree Protection Measures. 15

20.        Amusement Devices. 15

21.        Energy Use. 17

22.        Drones. 17

23.        Fireworks. 17

24.        Bay Run and other Running/ Walking Events. 18

25.        Dangerous Activities. 18

26.        Linemarking. 18

27.        Sale of Goods, Admission Fees & Fencing. 18

28.        Food Handling. 19

29.        Alcohol 19

30.        Drinking Water 20

31.        Signage. 20

32.        First Aid. 20

33.        Toilets. 20

34.        Waste Management 21

35.        Smoking. 22

36.        Other Approvals. 23

Annexure 1 - Sample Risk Assessment and Control Template. 24

Annexure 2 - Event Audit Checklist Sample Template. 25

Annexure 3 - Sample Community Notification Letter Template. 28

 

 


 

1.  Introduction

 

The Guidelines provide advice on the management of major events in parks in the Inner West.  Depending on the size and nature of the event, it is not intended or envisaged that all of the matters outlined in this document will apply to all events.  Event Organisers are to utilise this document as a guideline, as relevant to the individual circumstances of the event they are planning.

 

Event Organisers must comply with the Events in Parks Policy, which is a separate document available on Council’s website.

 

2.  Traditional Welcome to Country

 

2.1.      Traditional Welcome to Country

 

At Inner West Council events and functions, a Traditional Welcome to Country speech is given.  We invite you to also incorporate this into your event.

 

A Welcome to Country is a speech given by a traditional custodian of the land, usually a Community Elder or representative nominated by the Metropolitan Local Aboriginal Lands Council (MLALC). It is mostly done at major events and meetings. It welcomes people to visit and meet on the traditional area. The traditional custodians of the area are people who have originally come from that region, and also are acknowledged by the community.

 

The original residents of the Inner West LGA were the Gadigal and Wangal peoples, clans of the Eora nation. Despite dispossession of land, the traditional custodians have a continuing relationship with the land.

 

In general, a non-Aboriginal person, or an Aboriginal person from a different community, cannot present a Welcome to Country.  They should present an Acknowledgement of traditional custodians.

 

A Welcome to Country should be considered for all major events.  Where a Welcome to Country is considered, thought should also be given to whether the Aboriginal Flag should be displayed.

 

2.2.      Acknowledging Traditional Custodians

 

For less formal events, or where a Welcome to Country is not possible, an acknowledgement of the traditional custodian should be considered as a sign of respect and recognition.

 

Examples of an acknowledgement include:

 

“Today we gather on the traditional lands of the Gadigal and Wangal people, lands on which Aboriginal peoples have performed age-old ceremonies of celebration, initiation and renewal. I acknowledge their custodianship over many centuries and their ongoing connection to these lands and contribution to our community”

           

“I would like to acknowledge the Gadigal and Wangal peoples of the Eora nation who are the traditional custodians of this land. I would also like to pay respect to Aboriginal Elders, past and present, and acknowledge their young people who will be our future leaders.”

 

It is also appropriate to acknowledge particular individuals such as Community Elders or representatives of the local Aboriginal community, Aunties or Uncles, if this is known:

 

“I would like to acknowledge the Gadigal Wangal people who are the Traditional custodians of the land we are meeting on and remind people that we are on Aboriginal land. I also acknowledge and pay my respect to the Elders and in particular those attending today’s event.”

 

3.  Event Organiser

 

Depending on the type and size of the event, Council may require the event to have a suitably qualified Event Organiser to plan and manage the event, including on the day of the event.  The Event Organiser shall provide to Council the contact number of a responsible person who may be contacted on the day of the event.

 

The nominated Event Organiser must be able to demonstrate that they have previously managed similar type and size events, preferably in a public location.  Council may require the Event Organiser to provide details of referees, whom Council may contact.

 

An Event Organiser is defined as a legal entity responsible for the event, that is, the entity who has taken out public liability insurance for the event. Legal liability and responsibilities are not diminished if the event is a community or not-for-profit event.

 

An Event Organiser may be an individual or an organisation.  The Event Organiser may or may not also be an employer. The employer has specific duties and responsibilities under Work Health and Safety legislation. All Event Organisers have a duty of care to provide for a safe event.

 

It is a legal requirement that Event Organisers obtain all relevant statutory and

regulatory permits required to stage events in the Inner West.  The Event Organiser must comply with all legal requirements relevant to the operation of the event and use of the venue and to ensure that all employees, agents and other persons associated with the event also comply.

 

4.  Event Plan

 

The Event Organiser is responsible for compiling an event plan and submitting a draft at the beginning of the Park Event application process. The size, scope and complexity of an event will determine what elements to include in the event plan. This section outlines the compulsory requirements, as well as other areas you may need to address. Please note that this is not an exhaustive list and you may need to undertake other preparation tasks.

 

The NSW Department of Premier & Cabinet have created an Event Starter Guide which may be of further assistance (https://www.dpc.nsw.gov.au/tools-and-resources/event-starter-guide/).

 

4.1.      Overview Section

 

The event overview section of your event plan should provide a high level summary to provide relevant people with a broad understanding of your event.  Information in this part of your plan should include:

·    event name

·    event locations

·    a description of your event

·    the main purpose of your event

·    event times and dates

·    dates and times of building and dismantling event infrastructure (known as bump in and bump out)

·    an overview of your event’s key entertainment and activities

·    target audience

·    how the event is being promoted and publicised, and

·    estimated attendance

 

4.2.      Event Running Sheet

 

A running sheet sets the timing and sequence of your event so that you and other key stakeholders know what is happening and when. A good running sheet includes a timeline of the event production schedule including bump-in/bump-out, event timings, locations and program details.  It also outlines key tasks and who is responsible for that task.

 

4.3.      Contact List

 

A contact list is necessary and should outline all of the key contacts for the event, including but not limited to staff, volunteers, contractors, stakeholders and public authorities (if applicable). It is also essential to add in any emergency contact details, including but not limited to 000.

 

You might need specialist personnel on-site or on-call, including electricians, plumbers, sound, lighting technicians and waste management contractors.

 

4.4.      Other Event Plan Items

 

Depending on the nature and size of the event, the Event Plan may also include the following:

 

·    Stakeholder meeting schedule and outcomes/ actions

·    Counter Terrorism Crowded Places Security Audit & Self-Assessment Tool

·    Traffic and pedestrian management plan

·    Risk assessment and management plan

·    Emergency management plan

·    Security and crowd control

·    Community notification

·    Tree management and protection plan

·    Wet weather contingency

·    Noise management

·    Location and details on temporary structures, equipment and stalls

·    Management of amusement devices

·    Management of drones

·    Management of outdoor movies

·    Sale of goods, admission fees and fencing

·    Food handling

·    Alcohol

·    Drinking water

·    Signage

·    First aid

·    Toilets

·    Waste and Litter Management

·    Smoking

 

See below in the document for further advice on these items.

 

5.  Event History

 

If the event is a reoccurring one, when determining whether to approve a park event, Council may take into consideration the management of previous events.  If Council (and/ or the NSW Police and/ or RMS) have raised concerns about prior events, these concerns will be placed in writing to the event applicant.  When reviewing applications for future events, Council (and/ or the NSW Police and/ or RMS) may refuse the application, or alternatively, may request further information to satisfy itself that the concerns have been addressed.

 

6.  Stakeholder Meeting

 

Depending on the size and location of the event, Council may require the Event Organiser to arrange a pre-event and/ or a post-event stakeholder meeting with Council and organisations such as the NSW Police, RMS and public transport providers.  The purpose of these meetings is to ensure that events are managed well, stakeholders are informed and all organisations understand their roles and responsibilities.

 

Council will determine if meetings are also required to be held with local community members or groups.

 

7.  Insurance

 

Every event must have appropriate public liability insurance to ensure the organising committees and their members are financially protected against loss should an incident occur.

 

A Certificate of Currency for public liability insurance of a minimum $20 million must be submitted to Inner West Council along with your application.

 

The Certificate of Currency must outline:

·    The name of the Insurer;

·    The limit of the indemnity;

·    Currency of the policy at the time of the event.

 

The policy must indicate that Inner West Council is noted as an Interested Party (Principal Indemnity Endorsement), and that the Business Activity shown on the Certificate of Currency must be appropriate for the organiser’s function, such as organising and running a community festival.

 

8.  Counter Terrorism Crowded Places Security Audit & Self-Assessment Tool

 

All Event Organisers must use the online tools found on the Secure NSW website to assess their event. On this website you will find the Crowded Places Security Audit and the Crowded Places Self-Assessment Tool. The result of the Crowded Places Self-Assessment Tool will determine if you need to speak with NSW Police about your event.

 

See this website for further details:

http://www.secure.nsw.gov.au/useful-resources/guidance-material/content.html

 

A copy may need to be provided to Council.

 

9.  Traffic & Pedestrian Management Plan

 

The Event Organiser is responsible for the preparation of a traffic and pedestrian management plan.  The traffic and pedestrian management plan should take into consideration:

·    Private vehicle access, travel routes and parking impacts;

·    Service vehicle access;

·    Public transport access;

·    Pedestrian access;

·    Cyclist access.

 

The traffic and pedestrian management plan should encourage the use of public and active transport as far as possible.  Depending on the size of the event, Council may require the Event Organiser to work with public transport providers (State Transit Authority, Sydney Trains, and NSW Taxi Association) to provide additional services to the area.  Council may require the Event Organiser to demonstrate that they have undertaken measures to encourage event participants to travel via public and active transport.  Council may require the Event Organiser to provide shuttle bus services to the event.

 

The traffic and pedestrian management plan will need to take into consideration the following impacts:

·    Event participants (crowd size);

·    The nature of the event including whether all event participants will arrive/ leave at the same time or whether this will be staggered;

·    Event Organisers undertaking set up/ pack down (e.g. Stallholders);

·    Safety issues associated with the event (particularly for pedestrians and pedestrian access);

·    Impacts on the surrounding neighbours and business owners;

·    Capacity of adjacent road network to handle expected traffic volumes;

·    Any recommendations from the NSW Police and/ or RMS for traffic management.

 

The traffic and pedestrian management plan should include:

 

·    Traffic diversion/redirection: Including details of road closures, detours, VMS signs and special event clearway signs;

·    Access: Site map with access points for contractors, patrons, stallholders, entertainers, staff, VIPs, local businesses, residents and emergency vehicles;

·    Access: Consideration of access for attendees with particular access requirements including:

A person with hearing or vision impairment;

A person who use a wheelchair;

A person with an intellectual disability;

An elderly or less mobile person;

·    Loading and unloading: Details about loading and unloading arrangements for contractors, stallholders, waste management contractors, entertainers, staff, volunteers and patrons;

·    Parking: Details about parking arrangements for contractors, stallholders, entertainers, staff volunteers, and patrons (including accessible parking);

·    Notification: Advertising road closures and special event clearways, resident/business letterbox drop, public transport notification.

 

If there will be impacts on traffic flow and/ or pedestrian safety, it may be necessary to prepare a Traffic Control Plan and hire Traffic Controllers and/ or User Pays Police Services.  All Traffic Controllers must have appropriate RMS Traffic Controller qualifications.  Further information on User Pays Police Services is available on their website (http://www.police.nsw.gov.au/online_services/user_charges_user_pays_policing_services).  The Event Organiser is responsible for all costs associated with traffic control. 

 

If temporary road closures or alterations to regulatory signs and markings are required to facilitate the event, this will need to be referred to the Inner West Local Traffic Committee for review and recommendation to a Council Meeting for determination.  Three months should be allowed for this process.  If your event involves a road closure/s or impacts the public transport network, this must be advertised in the local newspaper for a minimum 28 days inviting public submissions for consideration by Council prior to Traffic Committee consideration and Council determination. Fees and charges apply.

 

10.    Accessibility

 

Accessibility needs to be given consideration in planning for the event.  This includes accessible pathways for pedestrians and accessible parking near the event space.

 

At major events, an events space should be considered as a time out space for people with disabilities.

 

Further information on inclusion and accessibility can be found in Council’s Inclusion Access Plan.

 

11.    Risk Assessment & Management Plan

 

A risk assessment and management plan is an essential aspect of planning any event.  A risk assessment management plan identifies all the potential risks that may arise from holding an event and then lists the steps Event Organisers will take to reduce or mitigate identified risks.  The strategies for emergency and risk management must comply with ISO 31000 standards.

 

A risk can mean many things. For community events in the Inner West the main risks to consider are anything that could:

·    Cause harm to a person;

·    Cause damage to equipment, infrastructure, the event site or the environment.

 

A risk assessment should consider:

·    Existing risks of the site;

·    Risks the event creates;

·    External risks that the Event Organiser has little control over but which may need to be managed at the event.

 

A template is available in Annexure 1 - Sample Risk Assessment and Control Template.

 

The following are some risks which should be considered.  This is by no means intended to be an exhaustive list.

 

·    Trip hazards

·    Sun exposure or adverse/ extreme weather

·    Medical emergencies, including drug and alcohol issues, injuries or heat stroke

·    Emergencies requiring involvement of the police or fire brigades

·    Inadequate security

·    Property damage or loss

·    Lost children

·    Property damage or loss or theft

·    Fire

·    Marquee collapse

·    Working at heights during bump in/ bump out

·    Broken glass

·    Litter getting into waterways or becoming airborne

·    Contamination of land or waterways

·    Pollution incident

·    Food poisoning

·    Electrocution

·    Equipment, power or water failure

·    Manual handling of equipment

·    Disorderly conduct and/ or drug and alcohol affected participants

·    Noise nuisance caused to neighbours

·    Excessive litter left at the event

·    Loss of key contractors

·    Overcrowding or crowd control

·    Inadequate toilet facilities

·    Inadequate waste management

·    Lack of parking

·    Inadequate access for emergency vehicles

·    Inadequate access for waste collection vehicles

·    Inadequate pedestrian safety

·    Moving vehicles near the event site

·    Body of water near the event site

·    Jumping castles or carnival rides

 

 

It is important to remember that every event is different, different risks exist and different mitigation measures will need to be deployed.

 

All risks need to be eliminated where possible. However, this is not always possible therefore other measures need to be taken to reduce the risk and create a safer environment. The Event Organiser is responsible for site inspections and removing and/or reducing hazards prior to the start of the event (including bump in/ bump out).

 

A template is available in Annexure 2 - Event Audit Checklist Sample Template.

 

The Event Organiser is responsible for ensuring that all staff, contractors, casual workers and volunteers who are to work at the site or event receive a site safety induction before commencing any work.

 

The Event Organiser occupies and uses the venue at the Event Organiser’s own risk.  Council does not take any responsibility for staff or participant accident or injury.  Council does not take responsibility for any loss or damage to any infrastructure and equipment associated with your event installed in a venue. All infrastructure and equipment that is at the venue is at the Event Organiser’s risk.

 

12.    Emergency Management Plan

 

The Event Organiser is responsible for the preparation of an emergency management plan.  The plan must clearly define the processes to be followed in the event of an emergency situation occurring at the event.

 

This plan should be considered a “living document” and it should outline:

·    The potential emergencies that may arise;

·    The written procedures developed in response to the potential emergencies;

·    The staff members responsible for particular actions in an emergency situation;

·    Maximum crowd capacity for event site, plan crowd safety including safe entry and exit for maximum capacity crowds;

·    Make note of or plan large crowd egress/exit routes and emergency assembly points;

·    Develop and document evacuation and emergency plans;

·    Any recommendations from the NSW Police and other emergency service agencies.

 

The Event Organiser is responsible for notifying the local Emergency Services (Police, Ambulance, Fire Brigade, and SES) of the proposed event and provide any information that they request. 

 

Adequate hand held fire extinguishers must be readily available at all times during the event.

 

13.    Work Health and Safety

 

You have a duty of care to provide a safe environment in which staff, volunteers, performers and contractors can work.

 

Refer to the SafeWork NSW website (http://www.safework.nsw.gov.au/) to check what your legal responsibilities are.

 

14.    Security & Crowd Control

 

The Event Organiser is responsible for security and crowd control.  Depending on the type and size of the event, not all events will require security staff.   The Event Organiser is at all times responsible for the good order, conduct and behaviour of those persons attending the event. Council may specify that security staff are a requirement of your event approval.

 

Security staff can be engaged to carry out a range of duties at an event.  This may include:

·    Controlling entry into venues or events;

·    Monitoring and communicating on crowd and individual behaviour, including underage drinking or drug use;

·    Dealing with potentially aggressive, abusive or violent behaviour;

·    Verbally or physically managing aggressive, abusive or violent behaviour;

·    Coordinating emergency evacuation of a venue or event;

·    Induction, security and safety inspection of site;

·    Liaising with emergency services.

 

You must consider external factors that may compromise the security of your event:

·    Is the location of your event safe at all hours of the day and night? Consider what activity may take place at your event site during set up and pack down.

·    Will your equipment be set up for an extended period of time without many people on site?

·    Is there anything at your event that could be vandalised or damaged?

·    Are you expecting large crowd numbers?

·    Is there any possibility of crowd clashes?

·    Have you monitored the extent of your event's marketing campaign to feel confident in your estimates of crowd numbers?

 

Any security staff operating within a Council park must be engaged through a professional security company and they must have appropriate accreditation in accordance with the current NSW legislative and regulatory requirements.

 

The number of security staff you will need will depend on the following:

·    Whether alcohol is being served;

·    Recommendations from the NSW Police and/ or conditions of your liquor licence;

·    Recommendations from the security company based on the size of your event. They will provide this information in-line with relevant legislation;

·    Whether the event is high-risk.

 

If temporary structures, equipment or waste containers are left overnight in a park, the Event Organiser must arrange overnight security at their expense.

 

15.    Community Notification

 

The Event Organiser is responsible for community notification to the residents and business owners in the surrounding area that an event will be taking place.  It is particularly important to do this if the event is likely to have an impact on the normal activities of local residents.  The community notification must go to impacted properties at least seven days prior to the event bump-in.  The community notification must include a mobile telephone contact number of the Event Organiser or their delegate.  The Event Organiser must provide the Council with documented evidence of notification with the residents and businesses within the vicinity of the venue.

 

This letter is also an opportunity to invite these residents to attend or participate in your event.  A sample letter is provided in Annexure 3 - Sample Community Notification Letter Template.

 

Depending on the size and nature of the event, the area of letter distribution will vary.  Council will provide advice on the area to be notified.

 

The Event Organiser is responsible for addressing and/ or mitigating any impacts identified by the local community.

 

As part of any Section 68 Application, Council may also seek community feedback on the proposed event.

 

16.    Wet Weather Contingency

 

The Event Organiser should prepare a wet weather plan.  If cancellation or postponement of the event will be required, outline how the information will be communicated to the attendees in the case of wet weather.

 

Parks may be closed by Council, at its sole discretion, if damage may occur, there are safety concerns or essential works are required.  This decision is not negotiable.  No fee refunds are applicable.

 

17.    Entertainment and Noise Management

 

The Event Organiser is responsible for noise management.  It is important to minimise disruption to local and surrounding residents and businesses by monitoring the level of noise created by the event.

 

No public address (PA) system or electronically operated sound equipment shall be used unless approved by Council as part of the event.  Sound levels must not exceed LAeq 15 minute ≤ 65 dB(A) when measured at the nearest affected receiver (resident or business).  Sound levels should be regularly monitored.

 

Noisy activities should be located within the venue in an area that is least likely to affect nearby residents.  Sound amplifiers should be pointed in a direction that minimises noise for nearby residents.

 

A licence is required to use live music and or recorded music at the event if that music is protected by copyright.  The person who authorises the playing or performance of music at any event is responsible for obtaining the appropriate licences from the Australasian Performing Right Association (APRA) and the Phonographic Performance Company of Australia (PPCA).

 

Any entertainment must be suitable for a public space.  No offensive entertainment material will be permitted.

 

18.    Site Plan, Temporary Structures, Equipment and Stalls

 

Council must give approval in writing for all temporary structures, amusement devices (e.g. jumping castles, temporary rides), equipment and stalls proposed to be placed within a park. 

 

Council will not grant approval for the use of canteens which are being utilised by sporting clubs for seasonal bookings.

 

The Event Organiser must prepare an event layout and a site plan which should outline the layout of the event:

·    The location of permanent park structures, trees and vegetation;

·    The location, height and fixing methods of temporary structures, generators, fencing, amusement devices, equipment, and stalls (including their footprint size in m2);

·    Water and power supplies;

·    Location of loudspeakers, amplifiers and PA systems;

·    Approved alcohol consumption areas;

·    Waste and recycling facilities (for both visitor use and back of house);

·    Location of waste management access points;

·    Vehicle access points for bump in and out (including bump-in and out schedules);

·    Pedestrian access routes;

·    Parking (cars and bicycles);

·    The location of temporary signage, including directional signage outside the event venue;

·    The location of emergency access points;

·    First aid facilities.

 

Site plans should be clear, drawn to scale, with the scale and a legend noted on the plan.

 

Event Organisers must include adequate measures to ensure that the park and trees are protected from damage, including:

·    Protection of grass through the use of temporary protective boards or flooring to protect all high traffic areas including stalls, food, beverage and merchandise sale areas;

·    Where possible, structures should be located on hard surfaces (e.g. concrete pathways) to limit impact on the lawns;

·    Protection of garden beds and plantings through use of barricading not less than 2 metres off the garden beds to prevent public access;

·    Tree pruning and or trench digging is not permitted in any park/open space;

·    No signs or other structures are to be attached to trees unless approved by Council as part of the event;

·    All structures must be weighted and not pegged;

·    When using water-weighted structures, water weights must be pre-filled and cannot be emptied onto the grass;

·    Vehicles are not permitted to enter parks without prior written approval from Council.

 

The Event Organiser is responsible for ensuring temporary and custom built structures are erected and secured in accordance with the manufacturers/structural specifications to ensure they are structurally sound and can withstand likely wind in the locality and any likely live loadings. These manufacturers/structural specifications are to be provided to Council prior to the event. Separate certification shall also be provided to Council by the installers, for the structures, confirming installation on site in accordance with the relevant specifications.   Stage structures are not to be loaded in excess of those loadings recommended by the suppliers and/or manufacturer.

 

Any lighting, rigging, scaffolding or the like associated with the subject stages shall be constructed and certified by a Work Cover licensed rigger.

 

Electrical services serving the stage and/or associated structures shall meet with the relevant legislation and standards and be certified by a licensed electrical contractor prior to the commencement of use. 

 

All mechanical and electrical installations including generators, electrical cabling and any mobile structures are to be surrounded or covered by appropriate physical barriers so as to prevent unauthorised access by the public at all times, and to protect ground laid cabling from being trip hazards, during the event.  Where a cable tray is used the Event Organiser will be solely responsible for ensuring it does not pose a trip hazard to pedestrians.  The Event Organiser must take immediate action to remove or replace any cable tray which creates a public safety hazard.

 

The Event Organiser is responsible for ensuring all stall holders comply with the Event approval conditions and any other relevant legislation.  All suppliers must have their own public liability insurance.

 

19.    Tree Management and Protection Plan

 

Trees are significant elements of most parks in the Inner West and it is important that they are adequately protected during event to prevent damage. The Event Organiser is responsible for the preparation Tree Protection Plan which is to be prepared by an arborist with a minimum AQF Level 5 qualification in arboriculture and submitted to Council prior to the event for approval.

 

The Tree Protection Plan should address the following areas:

 

·    Designated access routes by vehicles, equipment and proposed locations of track matts where vehicles will be driving on grassed areas near trees;

·    A plan showing accurate locations of existing trees within the park (Council may be able to assist in providing this information) in the immediate vicinity of the event and the required Tree Protection Zones (TPZ);

·    The location of stalls, stages and portable toilets, etc;

·    Indication of the height and weight of the delivery vehicles that will be accessing the park.

 

Tree protection measures detailed in the plan shall be implemented and complied with for the duration of the event including site preparation and pack up.

 

Payment of a tree protection bond will be required, prior to approval of the event. All damage to Council trees, either deliberate or accidental should be reported to Council as soon as possible, outlining full details of the incident.

 

After the event the Event Organiser shall arrange an inspection of the trees within the park for any damage before any bond is released. 

 

19.1.   General Tree Protection Measures

 

·    All trees shall be protected in accordance with the Australian Standard Protection of Trees on Development Sites AS 4970—2009);

·    All temporary structures (including stalls, toilets, refrigeration units, generators etc.) are to be placed outside the TPZ of any tree;

·    Tree branches and trunks are not to be used to support temporary decorations, electrical cables, or signage. No fixings are to be placed in/on trees;

·    Track mats must be used to protect all surface tree roots from damage by stage or scaffold structures;

·    Ground protection, trunk and branch protection, mulching and / or tree protection fencing shall be utilised where directed by Council (if not already identified on the approved Tree Protection Plan);

·    The Event Organisers and their appointed staff are responsible for the supervision of all event contractors, vehicle and plant operators during the event to ensure tree protection measures are adhered to. This includes the induction of all staff on the importance of the tree protection. Vehicles/equipment shall travel along on the formally identified route during their arrival and departure.

 

20.    Amusement Devices

 

Amusement devices such as jumping castles, (and other inflatable equipment) ponies, bubble soccer, petting / reptile zoos must be approved by Council and will only be permitted within the following parks:

 

 

Park Name

Suburb

36th Battalion Park

Leichhardt

Albert Parade Reserve

Ashfield

*

Algie Park

Haberfield

*

Ashfield Park

Ashfield

Bill Peters Reserve

Ashfield

*

Birchgrove Park

Birchgrove

Birrung Park

Balmain

*

Blackmore Park

Leichhardt

Bridgewater Park

Rozelle

*

Camdenville Park

St Peters

Camperdown Memorial Rest Park

Newtown

*

Camperdown Park

Camperdown

*

Centenary Sportsground

Croydon

*

Cohen Park

Annandale

 

Darrell Jackson Gardens

Summer Hill

Dobroyd Parade North Reserve

Haberfield

*

Easton Park

Rozelle

Elkington Park

Balmain

Enmore Park

Marrickville

Evan Jones Playground

Leichhardt

Ewenton Park

Balmain

Gladstone Park

Balmain

*

Glover Street Sporting Ground Callan Park

Lilyfield

*

HJ Mahoney Memorial Park

Marrickville

*

Hammond Park

Ashfield

Hannan Reserve

Rozelle

Henson Park (surrounds)

Marrickville

Hoskins Park

Dulwich Hill

Hyam Street Reserve (Vernardi Green)

Balmain

J.F. Laxton Reserve

Dulwich Hill

Jack Shanahan Reserve

Dulwich Hill

Jarvie Park

Marrickville

Kendrick Park

Tempe

*

King George Park

Rozelle

Lambert Park

Leichhardt

*

Leichhardt #2 (Leichhardt Park)

Lilyfield

*

Leichhardt #3 (Leichhardt Park)

Lilyfield

Leichhardt Park (Giovinazzo Grove)

Lilyfield

Lookes Avenue Reserve

Balmain East

*

Mackey Park

Marrickville

Marr Reserve

Leichhardt

*

Marrickville Park

Marrickville

McNeilly Park

Marrickville

Montague Gardens

Stanmore

Mort Bay Park

Birchgrove

Morton Park

Dulwich Hill

O'Connor Reserve

Rozelle

O'Dea Reserve

Camperdown

Paringa Reserve

Balmain

*

Petersham Park

Petersham

Pioneers Memorial Park

Leichhardt

Punch Park

Balmain

Richard Murden Reserve

Haberfield

Robson Park

Haberfield

Shields Playground

Leichhardt

Simpson Park

St Peters

Smith Hogan Spindlers Park

Annandale

*

Steel Park

Marrickville

Sydenham Green

Sydenham

Tempe Lands – Village Green

Tempe

*

Tempe Reserve

Tempe

Tillman Park

Sydenham

Underwood Reserve

Summer Hill

Wangal Nura Park

Leichhardt

War Memorial Park

Leichhardt

*

Waterfront Drive Sporting Ground (Callan Park)

Lilyfield

Whites Creek Valley Park

Lilyfield

Wicks Park

Marrickville

Yeo Park

Ashfield

 

*Note: sporting events take priority on the sporting ground area over casual events

 

The Event Organiser is responsible for providing their own electricity for amusement devices (e.g. by generator). 

 

If a hirer is bring an amusement device into a Park they must booking the Park no matter how many people they have at the event.

 

Ponies and petting/ reptile zoos will require a plan for animal waste management and avoiding windblown animal bedding.

 

21.    Energy Use

 

In line with the residents’ ambition for an environmentally sustainable community, the Inner West Council is committed to reducing energy use and moving toward 100% renewable electricity. The Event Organiser should prioritise energy efficient electrical equipment and consider cleaner energy options where possible (e.g. biodiesel for generators)

 

22.    Drones

 

Drones must be operated in accordance with the requirements of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority.  Information is available on their website: https://www.casa.gov.au/aircraft/landing-page/flying-drones-australia

 

23.    Fireworks

 

Where a registered contractor is not being engaged for the purchase, use, store, manufacture, supply and transport of fireworks, a licence must be obtained from SafeWork NSW, and a copy must be provided to Council. Information is available on their website: http://www.safework.nsw.gov.au/licences-and-registrations/licences/explosives-and-fireworks-licences/fireworks

 

If the fireworks are on water, approval must also be obtained from RMS.

 

Council may also impose additional conditions on the use of fireworks.

 

24.    Bay Run and other Running/ Walking Events

 

All running / walking events are subject to approvals set out in the table mentioned in 6.2 Planning Approval by Council’s Development Assessment & Regulatory Services team (where needed).

 

All running / walking events must submit a potential course map with their booking application.  Where running/ walking events are held regularly at the same location, staff may require the course to be rotated to prevent wear and tear on the turf.  Staff can assist the Event Organiser in determining a range of routes.

 

To minimise impact on the surrounding residents and other Bay Run users, a maximum of one organised event per month will be approved for the Bay Run. No organisation is permitted to promote their event or company on the Bay Run (ie) handing out flyers, setting up pop up stalls or erecting banners

 

25.    Dangerous Activities         

 

Council must help ensure the safety of all park users.  Council will not grant approval to dangerous and unsuitable activities.  This includes but is not limited to archery; golf; go karting; paintball; laser tag; riding horses; driving of model cars; sale or use of glass receptacles; camping or lodging overnight; possession or utilisation of any firearms; coal BBQs; lighting candles; lighting fires (this excludes utilising the Council provided BBQs).

 

26.    Linemarking     

 

Where there is existing linemarking for use by the seasonal sporting clubs bookings, Council will not paint temporary linemarking for events.  Cones may be utilised as an alternative.

 

27.    Sale of Goods, Admission Fees & Fencing

 

The collection of monies and/or selling of goods, including an entry/ admission fee shall not be allowed within the confines of the park unless approved by Council in writing as part of the Section 68 Application.

 

If your event includes any form of selling in public place a vendor list will need to be completed, outlining vendor contact details, a description of items for sale and a detailed site plan. Forms of selling include but are not limited to goods, services, food, beverage, carnival rides, entry tickets and merchandise.  Vendors should be made aware of Council’s objectives around waste as set out in the Waste Management section.

 

Depending on the size and location of the event, Council may require the Event Organiser to install temporary fencing around perimeter of the event and its approaches for safety purposes.  Council may require the Event Organiser to operate managed entrance/ exits to the event to manage and restrict participant numbers.

 

Any proposed security fencing must be designed and installed to accommodate expected crowd loads in the venue.

 

The sale of goods is prohibited in some parks such as Pioneers Memorial Park.

 

 

28.    Food Handling

 

Council must give approval in writing for all temporary food businesses proposed as part of the event.

 

Food Safety laws in New South Wales include the Food Act 2003, the Food Regulation 2015 and the Food Standards Code which incorporates the Food Safety Standards.  The aim of these laws is to ensure that safe and suitable food is provided to consumers and to reduce the level of food-borne illness in Australia.

 

Guidelines for food businesses at temporary events have been developed by the NSW Food Authority and can be viewed at the NSW Food Authority website (http://www.foodauthority.nsw.gov.au/_Documents/retail/temp_events_guideline.pdf?utm_campaign=redirected).

 

Note that Council encourages recycling of food containers, please see the section on 7.32 Waste Management for details.

 

Council utilises a risk-based system to determine if food premises associated with the event will be inspected.  Any food inspections will be undertaken by Council’s Environmental Health Officer.

 

29.    Alcohol

 

No alcohol is permitted for sale at events in parks without a valid liquor licence and written Council approval.  Evidence of a liquor licence for the event must be supplied to Council and displayed at the event.  All stall holders and staff handling alcohol must be qualified with a Responsible Service of Alcohol competency card.

 

If alcohol is being served or sold, depending on the size and nature of the event, the Event Organiser may need to prepare an Alcohol Plan.  Major concerns with providing alcohol at events are; preventing the sale or provision of liquor to minors, preventing unduly intoxicated/disorderly persons and preventing access by minors to licensed areas.  Licensed areas should be clearly marked on the site plan, as well as any dry areas, and food should always be made available to guests.

 

The Alcohol Plan should detail:

·    The type of alcohol that will be available

·    The containers in which it will be served (glass containers are not permissible in parks)

·    Provisions for container collection during and after the event

·    Designated dry areas

·    Food provision areas and types of food available

·    The number and location of security personnel who will manage the area (this may also be included in your security plan)

·    The location of toilets and the ratio of toilets per attendees

·    The number of bar staff and their training levels

·    The proposed trading hours of the alcohol serving areas.

 

30.    Drinking Water

 

Events must cater for the health and comfort of patrons. Under the Building Code of Australia, Event Organisers must provide one drinking fountain or drinking tap for every 150 patrons or part thereof.  For events with less than 150 patrons, drinking water should be made freely available or if not feasible, cost less than the lowest price of any other drink sold to patrons.

 

Access to Council’s water supply will vary depending on the water and irrigation system within each park. 

 

Portable water vans can be hired by the Event Organiser.  Sydney Water is also able to provide drinking water fountains to large events (for a fee).

 

Note that Council encourages reduction of plastic water bottles, and communications for events should encourage patrons to bring their own water re-usable bottles (see 7.32 Waste Management section for further details).

 

31.    Signage

 

The Event Organiser must provide a detailed signage proposal that outlines all the proposed directional, amenity, emergency evacuation and assembly points, vehicle access for entry and exit on and off site, pedestrian access, accessibility options, multi-lingual, event/program schedule and event branding signage to be installed at the event. Please include details such as quantity, size, positioning and installation method. Signage includes variable message signs (VMS boards), billboards, banners, bunting, corflutes, maps and flags. Also include sponsorship/corporate logos attached/imprinted on marquees, temporary site sheds/buildings, inflatable gantries or fencing.

 

Signage may not be attached to trees.  Council structures or cover the top of existing Council signage without written approval from Council.

 

Depending on the size and location of the event, Council may require the Event Organiser to install VMS boards in advance of the event, to advise the public of the proposed upcoming event.

 

32.    First Aid

 

The Event Organiser should have a First Aid plan and procedures in place.  The number of first aid personnel and posts/stations required will depend on the size of the event.  First Aid personnel should be trained.  First aid personnel and facilities must be easily identified by patrons and adequately equipped.

 

 

 

 

33.    Toilets

 

The Event Organiser is responsible for ensuring that adequate toilet facilities are available for all participants, including accessible facilities. 

 

Any park public toilets will generally be made available for use during an event.  The Event Organiser is responsible for cleaning the public toilets during and at the conclusion of the event. 

 

The number of temporary toilets to be provided will depend on things such as:

·    Anticipated crowd numbers (maximum number of patrons at the event at any one time);

·    The duration of the event;

·    Availability and consumption of alcohol.

 

At an event where alcohol is permitted, the number of toilets to people ratio is 1:75.  For all other events a ratio of 1:150 is required.  Ten percent of toilets must be accessible.

 

Toilet facilities must be well lit for security and safety reasons, provided with soap and hand drying equipment and must be cleaned and re-stocked regularly. Toilets must also be located away from food storage and food services areas, provided with sharps disposal facilities and be suitable for wet weather conditions.

 

34.    Waste Management

 

The Event Organiser is responsible for waste management.  Managing waste at events helps ensure the safety and wellbeing of patrons and to protect the environment where the event takes place. 

 

Council has a target of becoming a zero waste community and supports the waste hierarchy of avoid, reuse, recycle and dispose as a last resort.  These practices aim to reduce waste to landfill. 

 

Event Organisers are responsible for developing a Waste and Litter Management Plan, which must be submitted to Council for approval, and must include:

 

·    All back of house is to be managed by vendors (eg packaging and used oil);

·    Information on activities to promote waste avoidance, reuse and recycling, in line with the guidance in this section;

·    A map of the event site showing waste/ recycling facility locations in relation to the waste generation points across the event;

·    Details of the anticipated amount and types of waste materials and how they will be managed (proposed collection, transport and disposal pathways);

·    The name of the company engaged to remove the waste and recycling and evidence of contracting the services and types and number of bins;

·    Frequency of collection and servicing of the bins during and after the event and access points for collection vehicles;

·    A list of actions required before, during and after the event to ensure waste and litter is managed and to ensure the safety of event staff and participants;

·    Plans for removing litter (and full bins) in and around the site during and at the end of the event;

·    Plans for ensuring safe handling and removal of waste during the event, and the process for proving instructions on safe handling methods and hazards associated with waste to staff and volunteers;

·    Plans for ensuring that stalls/vendors/sponsors do not distribute items that are not sustainable, and ensuring that back-of-house issues are well managed by vendors (eg packaging and used oil). 

 

Note that the Event Organiser is responsible for ensuring that stalls/vendors/sponsors comply with the Waste and Litter Management Plan.

 

The Event Organiser must ensure that the venue and the surrounding area is maintained in a clean and tidy condition throughout the event, including the bump-in and bump-out phases.  All waste and general rubbish are to be cleared on a regular basis.  All waste is to be contained inside bins and serviced through the event to ensure bins do not overflow.  Instructions on safe handling methods and the hazards associated with waste must be given to staff and volunteers.

 

Waste and recycling receptacles must have clear bin signs consistent with the NSW Environment Protection Authorities (EPA) standard away from home signage.  Further information is available on their website: https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/your-environment/recycling-and-reuse/business-government-recycling/standard-recycling-signs

 

Waste services can be provided by Council or a private contractor.  If you would like Council to supply waste and recycling bins and remove waste at your event, this would be at the expense of the Event Organiser.  Please contact Council’s Parks Planning and Engagement team for further information

 

Event Organisers must have the following waste reduction practices described in the Waste and Litter Management Plan and implemented at the event:

 

·    Identify opportunities to reduce generation of waste.  For example, encourage reusable alternatives such as reusable coffee cups and reusable water bottles.

·    Consider using compostable cutlery, containers and bags. Note that if these materials are used, they must be collected separately to other wastes, and a suitable commercial composting facility must be used to compost the material.  Disposing of compostable materials to landfill does not result in an environmental benefit.  If compostable cutlery etc is used, then food scraps can also be collected in this waste stream. 

·    If compostable materials are not feasible, then all materials used by the Event Organisers and associated stalls/vendors must be recyclable.  The Event Organiser must ensure that suitable recycling facilities are provided and that a contractor capable of suitably recycling the material that have been collected is employed.  Note that glass drinking containers are not permitted in parks due to the safety hazard, as set out earlier.

·    Reduce the use of single-use plastics such as straws, plastic bags, plastic water bottles.  This may include strategies such as encouraging patrons to bring their own re-usable water bottles, providing water bubblers, encouraging the use of paper (not plastic) bags, banning plastic straws and so on.

·    Ban balloons, glitter, confetti, party poppers that could be released into the air, land or water (as these generate litter and spread very small pieces of plastic that enter the environment).

 

 

 

35.    Smoking

 

Smoking is banned in all enclosed public places and certain outdoor public areas, under the Smoke-free Environment Act 2000 and the Smoke-Free Environment Regulation 2016. These bans protect people from harmful second-hand tobacco smoke. There is no safe level of exposure to second-hand smoke.

 

Smoking is not permitted in the following specific areas:

 

·    Within any structures (e.g. stage, stall);

·    Within 10 metres of children’s play equipment in outdoor public places;

·    Spectator areas at sports grounds or other recreational areas used for organised sporting events;

·    Within 10 metres of a food fair stall.

 

The Event Organiser must ensure that adequate ‘no-smoking’ signage is displayed throughout the event area. This signage needs to meet specific wording requirements as outlined in the Smoke-free Environment Regulation 2007.  Free signage can be ordered from NSW Health.  See the website for the order form (http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/tobacco/Pages/smoke-free-resources.aspx).

 

 

36.    Other Approvals

 

In addition to obtaining approval from the Inner West Council, you may require several other approvals depending on the activities at your event.  Applications for the following services should be made direct to each respective service provider:

 

·    Temporary event liquor licenses (Independent Liquor and Gaming Authority);

·    User pays police (NSW Police);

·    Sydney Buses (State Transit Authority);

·    Road occupancy license, special event clearways (Roads and Maritime Services);

·    Sydney Trains (Transport for NSW);

·    Taxi Council;

·    St John Ambulance or other first aid provider;

·    NSW Ambulance Service;

·    Music licenses (APRA AMCOS and PPCA);

·    Fireworks approvals (WorkCover and RMS)

·    Callan Park events (Office of Environment & Heritage).

 

Fees and charges may be applicable. Each service provider will advise.

 


 

Annexure 1 - Sample Risk Assessment and Control Template

 

Date:

 

Compiled By:

Event/Festival:

 

Reviewed By:

Risk/ Hazard

 

Effect of risk/hazard

Likeli-hood

Conse-quence

Risk Rating

Risk Mitigation/ Control Actions

Person Responsible

Risk Monitoring

E.g. Marquee Collapse

·    Injury to staff or patron

·    Event evacuation

·    Local media coverage – poor publicity

·    Legal action instigated

D – Unlikely

4 - Major

High

·    Ensure marquee is installed by appropriately qualified contractors

·    Etc.

 

·    Jill Blogs

·    Obtain a copy of  contractor qualifications

·    Etc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Annexure 2 - Event Audit Checklist Sample Template

 

DETAILS

Event Name

 

Event Description

 

Event Manager

 

Event Location

 

Persons Completing Inspection

 

Date

 

 

·                     EVENT CHECK LIST

·                     Acceptable

·                     Not Acceptable

·                     Not
Applicable

1.          HEALTH AND SAFETY SYSTEMS

 

 

 

1.1        Emergency Management Plan Available on Site

1.2        Risk Management Plan Available on Site

1.3        Induction Records for all staff, volunteers and Contractors

1.4        Emergency Procedures Chart Available on Site

1.5        Incident / Accident Report Forms

1.7        Safe Work Method Statements on site

1.8       MSDS available for all chemicals held on site

2.          EVENT SITE

 

 

 

2.1        Work areas free from rubbish and obstructions

2.2        Surfaces safe and suitable

2.3        Free from slip/trip hazards

2.4        Stock/material stored safely

2.6        Adequate lighting

2.7        Adequate space for pedestrian and emergency services access/egress

2.8        Waste and recycling bins in place and servicing scheduled

2.9        Noise sources located away from surrounding residents

2.10     Loudspeakers pointed in a direction that minimises noise for nearby residents

3.          ELECTRICAL

 

 

 

3.1        No broken plugs, sockets, switches

3.2        No frayed or defective leads

3.3        Power tools in good condition

3.4        No work near exposed live electrical equipment

3.5        Tools and leads inspected and tagged

3.6        No strained leads

3.7        No cable-trip hazards

3.8        Switches / circuits identified

3.9        Lock-out procedures / danger tags in place

3.10     Earth leakage systems used

3.11     Start / stop switches clearly identified

3.12     Switchboards secured

3.13     Appropriate fire fighting equipment

4.          MOBILE PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (incl RIDES)

 

 

 

4.1        Plant and equipment in good condition

4.2        Daily safety inspection procedures / checklists

4.3        Fault reporting / rectification system used

4.4        Operators trained and licensed

4.5        Warning and instructions displayed

4.6        Certification of maintenance and operation

4.7        Satisfactory operating practices

4.8        Fire extinguisher appropriate and available

4.9       Infrastructure installed appropriately, with no trip hazards

4.10     Infrastructure and Rides installed on flat, secure surface

5.          STALLS

 

 

 

5.1        Adequate work space

5.2        Clean and tidy

5.3        Free from excess oil and grease

5.4        Adequately guarded

5.5        Warnings or instructions displayed

5.6        Operated safety and correctly

6.          FOOD STALLS

 

 

 

6.1        Gas bottles securely fixed to trolley

6.2        Fire extinguisher near work area

6.3        LPG bottles within 10 year stamp

6.4        Protective equipment provided and worn

6.5       Food safety plan and health permit provided

6.6       Safe Food Handling Requirements displayed

6.7        Refrigeration available where required and in good working order

6.8       Good hygiene practices demonstrated

7.          PERSONNEL

 

 

 

7.1       Wearing appropriate PPE

7.2       Undertaking required rest breaks

7.3       Staffing levels appropriate ie First Aid, cleaning, waste management

7.4       Event being conducted in a safe and professional manner

8.          BUMP OUT

 

 

 

8.1       All litter removed from the area

8.2       No waste bins overflowing

8.3       No water bubblers or taps left running

8.4       No damage to lawn or vegetation

8.5      Public toilets have been cleaned


 

Annexure 3 - Sample Community Notification Letter Template

 

 

(date)

Dear Resident

This letter is to advise you that (event name) will be held on (event date) at (location).  The event will commence at (time) and conclude at (time).  Event bump-in will commence at (time) and event bump-out will conclude at (time).

There will be a variety of entertainment and attractions at the event including: (include all entertainment/attractions/food/infrastructure/equipment).  We are expecting approximately (number participants) to attend.

The event will include: (List any issues that may affect surrounding residents including noise, an increase in vehicular traffic around the area, road closures, special event clearways, changes to public transport access and what time etc.)

(Also list how any of these issues have been addressed e.g. extra parking provisions and parking attendance around the location of the event).

If you would like any further information about this event, please contact me on (mobile phone number, address and email address).

I would like to take this opportunity to invite you to come along and participate in what should be a most enjoyable and exciting event for the residents of (suburb).

Regards



(Your name)
Event Organiser

 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

Item No:         C0818(3) Item 10

Subject:         Ferris Lane, Annandale - Potential Conversion to a Park           

Prepared By:     Aaron Callaghan - Parks Planning and Engagement Manager 

Authorised By:  Cathy Edwards-Davis - Group Manager Trees, Parks and Sports Fields

 

SUMMARY

This report addresses the Council resolution in relation to the Ferris Lane Annandale Green Space.  The report specifically focuses on the development of a landscape master plan for Ferris Lane, which has been developed in consultation with local residents. The landscape plan incorporates a community garden, rain capture and flood mitigation. Capital costs associated with any future implementation of the landscape plan are outlined in the financial section of the report. Other keys issues including key strategic opportunities, future road closures and the need for a sustainable water supply are also highlighted in the body of the report.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT Council:

 

1.       Note the attached landscape plan (Attachment 1) which has been developed by Council officers in relation to the Ferris Lane Annandale Green Space;

 

2.       Note the capital costs associated with the project and consider funding this project as part of a future capital budget initiative in future years; and

 

3.       Note that any future capital budget initiative for improvements in Ferris lane should be aligned with future stormwater improvement upgrade works.

 

 

 

 

BACKGROUND

At its Ordinary Meeting on 13th February 2018 Council resolved that “ Council Staff bring back a Council report on the conversion of Ferris Lane to a Park incorporating a community garden, rain capture and flood mitigation elements” (refer to C0218).

 

Council officers have met with local residents to discuss original proposals for converting Ferris Lane into a park. It is noted that local residents have already adopted the laneway as an open space. This adoption has included transforming the laneway over the last few years into an informal garden space with many found objects being utilised to grow both decorative and edible plants. The laneway has become an area for local residents to socialise, meet and greet as well as an attractive space for informal recreation and socialisation. The laneway provides an important link from Ferris Street to Whites Creek lane, which subsequently links up to Evan Jones Park.  Importantly residents have maintained the laneway and worked hard to make it an attractive and well-maintained space. 

The current zoning of the laneway is R1 (residential zoning) and the site lies on an overland flood path. Drainage on site is currently poor and there is a need for a stormwater upgrade of the laneway to address stormwater management during periods of heavy rain. There is no water harvesting on the site and watering of planters and garden areas is managed by hose supply. Management and beautification of the laneway has been managed solely by local volunteers with no direct involvement from Council. 

In developing a landscape plan for Ferris Lane, Council officers have taken into account a number of important design issues including:

·    Community expectations, previous design options and current land use management practices.

·    Future use of the laneway as a recreational space for socialization, informal recreation and as an alternative transport link between Ferris Street and Whites Creek Lane

·    Any future Council investment being limited to hard landscaping and drainage improvement works. Community ownership of the site being fostered through soft landscaping development and ongoing future garden management.

 

Key Landscape Design Features

Key Design features of the landscape design (Refer Attachment 1) are summerised as follows:

 

·    Provision of a rain garden for stormwater treatment at the Ferris Street entrance to the laneway.

·    Refurbishment of the current hard surfacing and the creation of a meandering path utlising deco granite and a central meeting point utilising recycled brick paving. 

·    Provision of art work in consultation with local residents

·    Provision of raised planters for local community garden planting (vegetables and herbs)

·    Provision of large pots for fruit tree planting.

·    Hydraulic stormwater engineering improvements to address stormwater management on the site.

·    Provision of a trellised pergola and seating area which can also be utlised for the discrete and secure storage of garden equipment. 

The landscape plan also allows for contamination testing in areas, which have been developed and are being utilised by community members for growing edible produce. 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

This project has been costed at approximately $235,000. This sum includes soil testing and allowance for contingencies. Should Council decide to remediate the whole site, this would be an additional $90,000.

Council has no capital funding set aside for this project and if supported would need to fund the project in future years. Should funding support be forthcoming it is recommended that the project be undertaken concurrently with any planned stormwater improvement works to ensure value for money and minimisation of residential disruption.

 

OTHER STAFF COMMENTS

Draft Recreation and Needs Study: A Healthier Inner West

 

The utilisation of laneways in the Draft Recreation and Needs Study for community recreational opportunities is viewed as an important opportunity to deliver new public spaces which can not only increase the supply of much needed open space but can also support a diversity of uses including outdoor recreation and improved pedestrian amenity and green spaces.  The development of laneway spaces as new open space areas should also be critically assessed in terms of creating opportunities for unsupervised and unstructured play for children.

Road Closure

 

Should Council fund this project in the future, it is recommended that a permanent road closure of the laneway is initiated. Advice From Council’s Property Section has indicated that this work is likely to take twelve months to resolve should Council support formalisation of the Ferris Lane Open Space project.

 

License Agreement

 

If this project be supported in future years it is recommended that any redevelopment of the laneway is subject to a future license agreement in terms of community garden management. While activation of the laneway would support local recreational needs and improve local amenity ongoing management of this space should be maintained by the community and subject to governance controls.  The site should be managed by the Community, not Council. 

 

Water Supply

 

Currently there is no formal water supply on site. Watering is currently being undertaken with the support of local residents from mains supply. Council officers would recommend that if this project is supported into the future that negotiation is held with neighbouring properties on support for a sustainable water supply through the provision of slim line rainwater tanks.

 

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Consultation and community engagement on the proposed landscape design and its cost implications has been limited to the key community representatives who have been responsible for the creation and maintenance of the existing landscaping improvements within the laneway.  Should this project be funded in the future, further engagement with the broader community would be undertaken.

 

CONCLUSION

The informal adoption of Ferris Lane by local Annandale residents and its transformation to a living and vibrant space is supported by Council staff. The transformation of the laneway and its improvement through planting works and the placement of found objects makes it a vibrant, interesting and welcoming space. Maintenance of the laneway space is currently carried out solely by volunteers and their work efforts in beautifying the laneway and creating a community meeting place are to be applauded.

 

The cost to Council in formalising this arrangement and undertaking further amenity improvements needs to be considered carefully in line with current and future capital improvement priorities within the local government area. Support by Council for implementing the master plan for this space needs to be weighed up with the overall community benefits which will be derived from such work and current and future community priorities which Council has committed to.   Any commitment by Council to supporting this project needs to be integrated with future stormwater improvement works and governance arrangements in relation to ongoing community management of the site.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

Attachment 1 -Ferris Lane Concept Plans

  


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

Item No:         C0818(3) Item 11

Subject:         Change in parking meter operational hours in the side streets of Leichhardt, Rozelle and Balmain           

Prepared By:     Manod Wickramasinghe - Coordinator – Traffic and Parking Services 

Authorised By:  Wal Petschler - Group Manager Footpaths, Roads, Traffic and Stormwater

 

SUMMARY

At its meeting held 12 October 2017, Council committed to a policy of turning off parking meters in the former Leichhardt Municipality at 7pm and requested a detailed report on the policy’s cost, funding and implementation. A further report was presented to the Council meeting held 13 March 2018 where Council resolved that the parking meters on the mainstreets would be turned off at 7pm and also resolved to engage with the community on switching the side street parking meters off at 7pm in addition to extending the 30 minute free parking to the side streets.

 

The loss of revenue arising from switching the side street parking meters off at 7pm and extending the 30 minute free parking to the side streets is estimated at approximately $709,000 per annum ($488,000  and $221,000 respectively).

 

Community engagement has been completed and has shown that 61% of respondents supported turning off side street meters at 7:00pm and 69% of respondents supported extending 30 minute free parking to the meters in the side streets. It is clear from the comments received that the objections are primarily from residents who are concerned that switching the meters off at 7pm and introducing 30 minute free parking tickets to the side streets would increase demand for parking in the residential areas and displace resident parking.

 

It is recommended to switch off the parking meters in the side streets of Leichhardt, Rozelle and Balmain at 7pm to match the current operating hours of the main street parking meters.

In order to address residents’ concerns, it is proposed that 2P parking (non-ticket) is introduced between 7pm and 10pm in front of residential properties to induce parking turnover after 7pm (as per the recommendation of the August 2018 Traffic Committee – Item 15).

 

It is also recommended to not extend the 30 minute free parking into the side streets to limit shopper parking in residential side streets throughout operating hours of the parking meters. However, in order to provide consistency in the free parking tickets issued, it is recommended that the existing 15 minute parking ticket zones (11 parking meters in side streets) be converted to 30 minute free parking zones.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT:

 

1.       The operational hours for parking meters in the side streets of Leichhardt, Rozelle and Balmain be amended to switch off at 7pm to match the current operating hours of the main street parking meters;

 

2.       The 30 minute free parking tickets not be extended to the side street parking meters; and

 

3.       Existing 15 minute free parking zones (11 parking meters) be converted to 30 minute free  parking zones.

 

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

At its meeting of 13 March 2018, Council considered a report regarding parking meter operations in Leichhardt, Rozelle and Balmain outlining:

 

·    the cost of switching parking meters off at 7pm and related funding implications and implementation

·    benefits, costs and impacts of extending 30 minute free parking.

 

Council resolved to :

 

1.    Proceed to turn off parking meters at 7pm in the following Mainstreets from Thursday 5 April:

 

a.    Norton Street, Leichhardt

b.    Darling Street, Rozelle and

c.    Darling Street, Balmain;

 

2.    Initiate consultation with the community including chamber of commerce, businesses and surrounding residents on the proposal to turn off parking meters at 7 pm in the adjoining side streets and extend 30 minute parking to those streets and receive a report back on the outcome of that consultation;

 

3.    Fund the program through a miscellaneous 2017/2018 budget savings rather than increasing parking permit fees or parking fees;

 

4.    That Council review and report back on whether to continue to implement in the previous Leichhardt area and to report on how meters in the previous Leichhardt Council area only would be consistent with a broader Inner West policy, where meters will not be placed in the previous Ashfield and Marrickville Council areas (except for a tiny number in Newtown); and

 

5.    A report come back after six months on the implementation of time limits on main street parking.

 

Part 1 of the resolution has been implemented. This report addresses part 2 of the above resolution.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

In the 2017/18 financial year, Council budgeted to receive $4,150,000 revenue from its parking meter management strategies. This has since reduced to $3,895,000 for the 2018/19 financial year following the reduction in operating hours of main street parking meters in Leichhardt, Balmain and Rozelle.

 

The potential revenue losses associated with proposed meter changes have been estimated by analysing individual parking meter transactions and parking related infringement notices over a 3-month period (Sept – Nov 2017) and extrapolating potential losses over a year.

 a)   Turning off parking meters at 7pm

 

The modelling previously presented to the March 2018 Council Meeting estimated that turning the parking meters off at 7PM in both main street and side streets may result in a total estimated $1.1 million revenue loss consisting of both meter and fine revenue. Of this amount approximately $488,000 relates to switching off side street meters at 7pm.

 

 

 

 

Side Streets

Meter Revenue

$400,000

Lost Fine Revenue

$88,000

Total

$488,000

 

A one-time additional cost of approximately $31,000 will be required to re-program all parking meters, change tariff labels, supply and install new signage.

 

b)    Extension of 30 minute free parking into the side streets

 

The potential parking meter revenue losses of extending 30 minute free tickets into the side streets has been estimated by analysing short term parking transactions in side-streets over a 3-month period and extrapolating potential losses over a year.

 

Based on current usage this modelling indicates that introducing 30 minute free parking into the side streets is expected to result in a revenue loss of $221,000.  This potential loss will increase if motorist behaviour changes to make further use of the free parking.

 

Previous study into the introduction of 30 minute free parking into the main-streets indicated there was no overall decrease in the number of meter related fines in 2012/13. This may have resulted as a consequence of increased enforcement consistent with the findings of the previous parking study which identified that enforcement needed to be increased in all areas to ensure parking compliance. Approximately 75% of fines issued are for ‘not displaying a ticket’. The potential impacts of 30 minute free parking on fine related revenue will need to be reviewed over an extended period of time.

 

A one-time additional cost of approximately $26,000 will be required to re-program all parking meters, change tariff labels and alter signage.

 

Subsequently, the total per annum cost of implementing the proposed amendments of switching off the side street meters at 7pm and extending the 30 minute free tickets into the side street meters is estimated at $709,000.

 

It should be noted that these figures were calculated as per the 2017/18 parking meter tariff rates, the parking meter tariff rates have since increased by 2.5% in the 2018/19 financial year which in turn increases the potential revenue loss by the same percentage.

 

OTHER STAFF COMMENTS

Parking Meter Strategy

 

Parking meters in the former Leichhardt Municipality are located in the Leichhardt, Rozelle and Balmain town centres and were originally installed in 2001 to better manage the high demand for, and utilisation of, parking in each business area. The parking meters formed part of Council’s parking management strategy with objectives to:

 

·    Ensure on-street parking turnover

·    Provide improved access to on-street carparking for business customers

·    Discourage illegal / overstay parking

·    Discourage commuter parking

·    Encourage the use of public transport .

 

A number of nearby Councils in Sydney operate parking meter schemes including; City of Sydney, Waverley, North Sydney and Woollahra.

 

 

Current Parking Meter Operation

 

Existing hours of operation of the parking meters in the mainstreets of Leichhardt, Rozelle and Balmain now span from 8.00AM to 7.00PM, 7 days per week. Parking on the main-streets requires a motorist to display a paid or a 30-minute free ticket. There are 70 mainstreet parking meters in Leichhardt, Rozelle and Balmain.

 

Existing hours of operation of the parking meters in the side streets of Leichhardt, Rozelle and Balmain span from 8.00AM to 10.00PM, 7 days per week. Parking on the side streets requires a motorist to display a paid ticket, 15-minute free ticket (only operating for 11 parking meters in locations adjacent to the mainstreets) or valid parking permit. There are 214 side street parking meters in Leichhardt, Rozelle and Balmain.

 

Council introduced 30 minute free, ticketed parking along the main-streets of these suburbs to allow for short term parking to access businesses. This initiative has been popular and usage of the 30 minute free ticketed parking continues to increase. Between 2013 and 2017, the issue of paid parking tickets on main-streets has decreased from approximately 25,000 tickets per month to 19,000  whilst free parking tickets has increased from 80,000 to 112,500 tickets per month. The 30 minute parking represents 86% of parking tickets currently issued on main-streets.

 

Parking Management Impacts

 

(a) Turning Side Street Parking Meters off from 7PM-10PM

In order to assess whether the existing parking meter fee is deterring motorists from parking in the shopping precincts, a parking study was undertaken in November 2017 to assess the usage of metered parking spaces in the shopping precincts of Leichhardt, Rozelle and Balmain.

 

The following graphs outlines the parking occupancy rates in side streets of Leichhardt, Rozelle and Balmain on a Friday and Saturday night in ticket parking areas.

 

 

The graphs from the current parking survey shows that parking occupancy in the side streets of Leichhardt and Balmain are very high. It should be noted that Rozelle has only a small number of businesses which operate at night which is reflected in lower occupancy rates compared to Balmain and Leichhardt.

 

There is still a strong evening demand for parking within each of the shopping centres and this needs to continue to be managed through effective parking management strategies.

 

Altering the operational hours of the existing parking meters in the side streets to shut off from 7PM to 10PM will likely reduce parking turnover near the mainstreets as motorists would be able to park for free from 7PM to 8AM the following day. Noting the side streets are predominantly residential, this may then displace resident parking. Council can introduce 2P parking (no ticket) in the time between 7pm and 10pm in residential side streets to provide some parking turnover after 7pm.

 

 

(b)   Extension of 30 minute free tickets to all parking meters

 

Parking meters which issue 30 minute free parking tickets are limited to the mainstreets of Leichhardt, Rozelle and Balmain. There are also 11 parking meters in commercially zoned side streets adjacent to the mainstreet which issue 15 minute parking tickets. Extending the 30 minute free parking tickets to encompass all parking meters would have a number of advantages and disadvantages.

 

Advantages include:

·    Allows short term parking for resident visitors without requiring use of visitor parking permits

·    Allows short term parking for shoppers on the side-streets

·    30 minute free parking on the mainstreets has previously been shown to reduce the average length of stay for each vehicle from 51 mins (for 2P areas) to 41 mins.

·    Creates consistency amongst all parking meters in the former Leichhardt LGA

 

Disadvantages include:

·    Meter revenue loss is estimated at $221,000 based on current user behaviour and is likely to also affect fine related revenue

·    Proposal will encourage shopper parking in side streets and this will potentially displace resident parking.

 

Implementation

 

Should Council proceed to switch the parking meters in the side streets off at 7pm, it is estimated that it would take approximately 3-4 months to implement owing to the significant number of signage replacements required. The introduction of 30 minute free parking is estimated to take 2 months if done in isolation. Changes would be implemented on a street-by-street basis. The following changes are required:

·    Change parking signage in side streets

·    Change parking meter tariff labels of meters in side streets

·    Change parking meter programming of meters in side streets

 

A separate report outlining the required changes to the regulatory signage was reported to the Local Traffic Committee meeting held 7 August 2018 (Item 15) and has been supported by the Committee, subject to the outcome of this report.

 

In order to allow a balance between residential and commercial needs in these side streets, the following has been considered when preparing the proposed amended parking restrictions.

 

·    Metered parking restrictions adjacent to non-residential properties in the side streets could typically terminate at 7pm and allow unrestricted parking between 7pm and 8am the following day. This would match the restrictions on the mainstreets.

·    Metered parking restrictions adjacent to residential properties in the side streets could typically terminate at 7pm and 2P residential parking restrictions could operate between 7pm and 10pm to provide residents with an improved opportunity to park.

 

Parking restrictions currently operate in a number of streets in Leichhardt, Rozelle and Balmain as listed below. All streets would require replacement of regulatory signage in addition to changes to the parking meter programming.

 

Jacques Street, Balmain

North Street, Balmain

Rowntree Street, Balmain

 

College Street, Balmain

 

Mort Street, Balmain

 

Ford Street, Balmain

 

McDonald Street, Balmain

 

Palmer Street, Balmain

 

Montague Street, Balmain

 

Curtis Road, Balmain

 

Church Street, Balmain

 

King Street, Balmain

 

Birchgrove Road, Balmain

 

Llewellyn Street, Balmain

 

Little Darling Street, Balmain

 

Montague Street, Balmain

 

Beattie Street, Balmain

 

Booth Street, Balmain

 

Darvall Street, Balmain

 

Eaton Street, Balmain

 

Marion Street, Leichhardt

 

Wetherill Street, Leichhardt

 

Short Street, Leichhardt

 

Macauley Street, Leichhardt

 

Carlisle Street, Leichhardt

 

Marlborough Street, Leichhardt

Renwick Street, Leichhardt

Arthur Street, Leichhardt

 

Nelson Street, Rozelle

 

Merton Street, Rozelle

 

National Street, Rozelle

 

Beattie Street, Rozelle

 

Red Lion Street, Rozelle

 

Oxford Street, Rozelle

 

Cambridge Street, Rozelle

 

Waterloo Street, Rozelle

 

Belmore Street, Rozelle

 

Wise Street, Rozelle

 

Hancock Street, Rozelle

 

 

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

As per the resolution, Council has engaged the local community on parking meter changes in Leichhardt, Balmain and Rozelle side streets.

The engagement was promoted through:

·    Letter distributed to residences in Balmain, Leichhardt, Rozelle, Balmain East, Birchgrove, Lilyfield, Annandale and Haberfield (total 27,300).

·    Letter distributed to businesses in Norton Street, Leichhardt and Darling Street, Balmain and Rozelle (total 1,200).

·    Letter to Leichhardt/Annandale Business Chamber and Balmain/Rozelle Chamber

·    Media release, social media

·    Council’s column in the Inner West Courier

·    Council’s enews and Your Say Inner West enews

The engagement was open from 3 April to 20 May 2018 and a total of 338 surveys responses were received.

A detailed Engagement Outcomes Report is included in Attachment 1.

A majority of respondents supported turning off meters at 7:00pm (61% of respondents) and a majority also supported extending 30 minute free parking (69% of respondents) to the meters in the side streets. The following two graphs show the support rates.

 

 

However, it is clear from the comments received that the majority of objections are from residents who have strong concern about possible impacts on already limited resident parking.

 

Residents in the side streets are eligible for parking permits which provide preferential parking by exempting them from parking meter payments and time limits on the parking control signs.

 

These residents have commented that parking levels in the side streets are already at capacity and by removing the ticket parking restrictions at 7pm, residents would have to compete with visitors for the remaining parking spaces.

 

Those who support the proposal mainly believe it will support local business, bring in visitors and help revitalise the main streets.

 

The two local business chambers made submissions of support which are also shown in Attachment 1.

 

CONCLUSION

Community engagement has been completed and has shown that 61% of respondents supported turning off side street meters at 7:00pm and 69% of respondents supported extending 30 minute free parking to the meters in the side streets.

 

It is clear from the comments received that the objections are primarily from residents who are concerned that switching the meters off at 7pm and introducing 30 minute free parking tickets to the side streets would increase demand for parking in the residential areas and displace resident parking.

 

From a parking management standpoint it is difficult to justify paid parking in side streets whilst it remains free in the adjoining main streets. It is therefore recommended to switch off the parking meters in the side streets of Leichhardt, Rozelle and Balmain at 7pm to match the current operating hours of the main street parking meters.

 

In order to address resident concerns, it is proposed that 2P parking (non-ticket) is introduced between 7pm and 10pm to induce parking turnover after 7pm (as per the recommendation of the August 2018 Traffic Committee – Item 15).

 

It is also recommended to not extend the 30 minute free parking into the side streets to limit shopper parking in residential side streets throughout operating hours of the parking meters. However, in order to provide consistency in the free parking tickets issued, it is recommended that the existing 15 minute parking ticket zones (11 parking meters) be converted to 30 minute free parking zones.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

Engagement Outcomes Report-Parking Meters Changes-June 2018

  


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

Item No:         C0818(3) Item 12

Subject:         Victoria Street, Ashfield - Proposed combined bus stop and pedestrian crossover facility opposite Cardinal Freeman Village           

Prepared By:     Boris Muha - Engineer – Traffic and Parking Services  

Authorised By:  Wal Petschler - Group Manager Footpaths, Roads, Traffic and Stormwater

 

SUMMARY

In considering a Notice of Motion at its meeting of 24th April 2018 to rescind a previous Council resolution to construct a bus stop and pedestrian facility in Victoria Street, Ashfield opposite the Cardinal Freeman Village, Council resolved:

“THAT a report be brought to Council on the background of the decision to provide a  bus stop outside 126 Victoria Street Ashfield and whether the developer was approached for a contribution towards the provision of the facility.”

 

A copy of the report to the Local Traffic Committee, which provides details for the project, is provided at Attachment 1.

The project is a legacy project of the former Ashfield Council. No contributions were sought from the developer specifically for this project.

The proposed facility is intended to improve accessibility to the bus service for residents of the village and surrounding area and provide a safer crossing point.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT the report be received and noted.

 

 

 

BACKGROUND

At its meeting of 27th February 2018 Council endorsed the Local Traffic Committee recommendation that an “in-lane” bus stop platform and pedestrian facility be constructed adjacent No. 126 Victoria St, opposite Cardinal Freeman Retirement Village. The facility is intended to improve accessibility to the bus service for residents of the village and surrounding area and provide a safer crossing point.

The project is a legacy project of the former Ashfield Council which resolved to consider the facility on the eastern side of Victoria Street following a period of trial of a similar facility constructed previously on the western side.

At its meeting of 24th April Council considered a Notice of Motion to rescind Council’s resolution of 27th February to construct the facility. Council subsequently resolved:

“THAT a report be brought to Council on the background of the decision to provide a  bus stop outside 126 Victoria Street Ashfield and whether the developer was approached for a contribution towards the provision of the facility.”

 

A copy of the report to the Local Traffic Committee, which provides details for the project, is provided at Attachment 1.

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

A budget of $80,000 to construct the proposed works has been provided in the 2018/2019 capital works program.

 

 

OTHER STAFF COMMENTS

The project originated following an initial request (prior to 2014 and any Development Application) by the Cardinal Freeman Retirement Village and Sydney Buses to provide public Bus Stop facilities on both sides of Victoria Street adjacent to the Village to serve the village residents and the general public in the area.

The developer undertaking the redevelopment works at the Cardinal Freeman Retirement Village was not approached to fund the proposed Bus Stop facility.  The proposal to provide a Bus Stop facility opposite the Village was raised before the re-development of the Village. No specific Conditions were imposed in the Development Consent for the developer to contribute or construct the facility.

The proposed facility will function as an ‘in-lane’ bus stop with a concrete pedestrian platform/ refuge extending to the edge of the travel lane. The facility incorporates a pedestrian crossover point with road narrowing to reduce the pedestrian crossing distance and reduce vehicular speeds.

 

 

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Public consultation was undertaken as part of the design development. Details of public consultation are provided in the report to the 7th December 2017 Local Traffic Committee meeting, Attachment 1.

 

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

Report Item 10 - Local Traffic Committee 7 December 2017 - Proposed combined bus stop and pedestrian crossover facility opposite Cardinal Freeman Village

  


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

Item No:         C0818(3) Item 13

Subject:         Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 7 August 2018  

Prepared By:     John Stephens - Traffic and Transport Services Manager  

Authorised By:  Wal Petschler - Group Manager Footpaths, Roads, Traffic and Stormwater

 

SUMMARY

The minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 7 August 2018 are presented for Council consideration.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

 

THAT the Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 7 August 2018 be received and the recommendations be adopted.

 

 

 

ITEMS BY WARD

 

Ward

Item

Page Number

Leichhardt

LTC0818 Item 1         

Seven Bridges Walk - Special Event - (Leichhardt & Balmain Ward/ Balmain Electorate/ Leichhardt LAC)

Page 2

Leichhardt

LTC0818 Item 3

Big Bike Day 2018 Special Event (Leichhardt and Balmain Ward/ Balmain Electorate/ Leichhardt LAC)

Page 3

Leichhardt

LTC0818 Item 6         

Moore Street at Ainsworth Street, Leichhardt - Proposed 'No Stopping' zones (Leichhardt Ward/ Balmain Electorate/ Leichhardt LAC)

Page 6

Leichhardt

LTC0818 Item 15       

Change in Parking Meter Operational Hours in side streets of Leichhardt, Rozelle and Balmain (Leichhardt and Balmain Ward /             Balmain Electorate / Leichhardt LAC)

Page 18

Lecihhardt

LTC0818 Item 19       

Cahill Street, Annandale - Extension of 'No Stopping' Zone (Leichhardt Ward/ Balmain Electorate/ Leichhardt LAC)

Page 23

Ashfield

LTC0818 Item 4         

Dixson Avenue, Dulwich Hill – Proposed Traffic Calming Design Plan 10005 - Improving pedestrian safety at its intersection with Old Canterbury Road   (Ashfield Ward/ Summer Hill Electorate/ Ashfield & Inner West LAC)

Page 4

Ashfield

LTC0818 Item 8         

Constitution Road, Dulwich Hill – Proposed Splitter Islands and Central Median Design Plans (Ashfield Ward/Summer Hill Electorate/Ashfield & Inner West LAC)

Page 8

Ashfield

LTC0818 Item 9         

Eltham Street, Dulwich Hill – Proposed Splitter Islands - Design Plans (Ashfield Ward/Summer Hill Electorate/Inner West LAC)

 

Page 10

Ashfield

LTC0818 Item 10      

Wood Street, Ashfield - Proposed kerb extensions and rain garden design plans (Ashfield Ward/ Summer Hill Electorate/ Ashfield LAC)

Page 10

Ashfield

LTC0818 Item 16   

Smith Lane, Summer Hill - Proposed 'No Parking' restrictions (Ashfield Ward/ Summer Hill Electrorate/ Ashfield LAC)

Page 19

Ashfield

LTC0818 Item 20    

Palace Street, Ashfield-Installation of 'Bus Zone' & 'No Stopping' restrictions (Ashfield Ward/Summer Hill Electorate/Ashfield LAC)

Page 23

Balmain

LTC0818 Item 1         

Seven Bridges Walk - Special Event - (Leichhardt & Balmain Ward/ Balmain Electorate/ Leichhardt LAC)

Page 2

Balmain

LTC0818 Item 3

Big Bike Day 2018 Special Event (Leichhardt and Balmain Ward/ Balmain Electorate/ Leichhardt LAC)

Page 3

Balmain

LTC0818 Item 11       

Temporary Road Closure to carryout sewer works on North Street,             Balmain (Balmain Ward/ Balmain Electorates/Leichhardt LAC)

Page 11

Balmain

LTC0818 Item 15       

Change in Parking Meter Operational Hours in side streets of Leichhardt, Rozelle and Balmain (Leichhardt and Balmain Ward /             Balmain Electorate / Leichhardt LAC)

Page 18

Stanmore

LTC0818 Item 13       

Henry Lane, Lewisham - Proposed 'No Parking' restrictions (Stanmore Ward/ Summer Hill Electorate/ Inner West LAC)

Page 16

Marrickville

LTC0818 Item 2         

Tempe Reserve – Installation of 'No Stopping' restrictions on both sides of the maintenance access for the Alexandra Canal Bridge and desalination pipeline easement    (Marrickville Ward / Heffron Electorate / Inner West- Marrickville LAC)

Page 2

Marrickville

LTC0818 Item 5         

Sydney Steel Road, Marrickville – Sydney Metro City and Southwest Project - Proposed Angled Parking and pedestrian thoroughfare (Marrickville Ward/Summer Hill Electorate/Inner West LAC)

Page 5

Marrickville

LTC0818 Item 7         

Bedwin Road/ Edinburgh Road/ Edgeware Road, Marrickville – Sydney Metro City and Southwest Project – Temporary traffic Signal installation and associated changes to line markings and parking restrictions (Marrickville Ward/Summer Hill Electorate/Inner West LAC)

Page 7

Marrickville

 

LTC0818 Item 12       

Temporary Road Closure of Applebee Street, St Peters to carry out sewer works (Marrickville Ward/ Heffron Electorate/ Newtown LAC)

Page 14

Marrickville

LTC0818 Item 14    

Edith Street, St Peters - Proposed 'No Parking' and 'No Stopping' Restrictions (Marrickville Ward/ Heffron Electorate/ Inner West LAC)

Page 17

Marrickville

LTC0818 Item 18    

Dudley Street, Dulwich Hill - Improving road safety in the street adjacent to the pedestrian refuge and temporary 'Works Zone'  (Marrickville Ward/ Summer Hill electorate / Inner West LAC)

Page 21

Marrickville

LTC0818 Item 21    

728-750 Princes Highway, Tempe – Proposed Bunnings Hardware & Building Supplies Store (Marrickville Ward / Summer Hill Electorate / Marrickville LAC)

Page 24

All Wards

 

LTC0818 Item 17    

Minor Traffic Facilities (All Wards/All Electorates/All LACs)

Page 20

All Wards

LTC0818 Item 22    

Edgeware Road, Newtown - No.310 Request for 'Works Zone' adjacent to construction site (All Wards/ All Electorates/ All LACs)

Page 28

 

BACKGROUND

Meeting of the Inner West Council Local Traffic Committee was held on 7 August 2018 at Petersham. The minutes of the August meeting are shown at ATTACHMENT 1.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

Projects proposed for implementation in 2017/18 are funded within existing budget allocations.

 

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Specific projects have undergone public consultation as indicated in the respective reports to

the Traffic Committee. Members of the public attended the meeting to address the Committee

on specific items.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

Minutes of Local Traffic Committee meeting held on 7 August 2018

  


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

 

Minutes of Local Traffic Committee Meeting

Held at Council Chambers, Petersham Service Centre on 7 August 2018

 

Meeting commenced at 10.03am

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY BY CHAIRPERSON

 

I acknowledge the Gadigal and Wangal people of the Eora nation on whose country we are meeting today, and their elders past and present.

 

COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT

 

 

 

Clr Marghanita Da Cruz

Leichhardt Ward (Chair)

Mr Kieren Ash

Representative for Ron Hoenig MP, Member for Heffron

Sgt John Micallef

NSW Police – Burwood Police Area Command

A/Sgt Charles Buttrose

NSW Police – Leichhardt Police Area Command

Sgt Paul Vlachos

NSW Police – Inner West Police Area Command

Mr Daryl Ninham

Roads and Maritime Services

 

 

COUNCILLORS AND OFFICERS IN ATTENDANCE

 

 

SC Sam Tohme

NSW Police – Burwood Police Area Command

Mr Asith Nagodavithane

Transit Systems – Inner West  Bus Services

Mr Colin Jones

Inner West Bicycle Coalition

Mr Wal Petschler

IWC’s Group Manager Roads, Traffic and Stormwater

Mr John Stephens

IWC’s Traffic and Transport Services Manager

Mr Manod Wickramasinghe

IWC’s Coordinator Traffic and Parking Services (North)

Ms Jenny Adams

IWC’s A/Coordinator Traffic and Parking Services (South)

Mr Joe Di Cesare

IWC’s Coordinator Design Services

Mr Davide Torresan

IWC’s Civil Engineer

Ms Christina Ip

IWC’s Business Administration Officer

 

 

VISITORS

 

 

 

Ms Carolyn Ridley

Item 4 – Resident

Mr Sava Savcic

Item 4 – Resident

Mr Peter Cassilles

Item 8 – Resident

Mr Cameron Crew

Item 13 – Resident

Resident

Item 13 – Resident

Mr Ken Moxham

Item 21 – Resident

Ms Jenny Griffith

Item 21 – Resident

Mr Graham Griffith

Item 21 – Resident

Mr Philip Drew 

Item 21 – Bunnings

Mr Ross Nettle

Item 21 – TTPA Traffic Consultant Bunnings

 

 

APOLOGIES:    

 

 

 

Ms Jo Haylen MP

Member for Summer Hill

Ms Sarina Foulstone

Representative for Jo Haylen MP, Member for Summer Hill

Ms Cathy Peters

Representative for Jenny Leong MP, Member for Newtown

Clr Julie Passas

Deputy Mayor – Ashfield Ward

Mr George Tsaprounis

IWC’s Coordinator Traffic and Parking Services (South)

 

 

 

DISCLOSURES OF INTERESTS:   Nil

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

 

The minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on Tuesday, 3 July 2018 were confirmed.

 

MATTERS ARISING FROM COUNCIL’S RESOLUTION OF MINUTES

 

The Local Traffic Committee recommendations of its meeting held on 3 July 2018 were adopted at Council’s meeting held on 24 July 2018, subject to staff reviewing the proposal to remove parking spaces in Item 19 Nowranie Lane Summer Hill – Proposed ‘No parking’ restrictions.

 

LTC0818 Item 1 Seven Bridges Walk - Special Event - (Leichhardt & Balmain Ward/ Balmain Electorate/ Leichhardt LAC)

SUMMARY

The Cancer Council NSW Seven Bridges Walk event will be held on Sunday, 28 October 2018 at various locations in Sydney including areas within the Inner West Council. The Event is in its thirteenth year of operation and the applicant seeks approval again in 2018.

 

Officer’s Recommendation

 

THAT The Cancer Council NSW Seven Bridges Walk to held on Sunday, 28 October 2018 be approved, subject to a current Public Liability Insurance Policy which includes the Inner West Council being an interested party being submitted by the event organiser prior to the event.

 

DISCUSSION

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT The Cancer Council NSW Seven Bridges Walk to held on Sunday, 28 October 2018 be approved, subject to a current Public Liability Insurance Policy which includes the Inner West Council being an interested party being submitted by the event organiser prior to the event.

 

For motion: Unanimous

 

 

LTC0818 Item 2 Tempe Reserve – Installation of 'No Stopping' restrictions on both sides of the maintenance access for the Alexandra Canal Bridge and desalination pipeline easement        (Marrickville Ward / Heffron Electorate / Inner West- Marrickville LAC)

SUMMARY

A request has been received from Council’s Parks Section to install ‘No Stopping’ restrictions in Tempe Recreation Reserve at the entrances to the maintenance access road for the Alexandra Canal Bridge and desalination pipeline easement. It has been reported that on numerous occasions vehicles have been parked across the entrances to the access road and pipeline easement.

 

It is recommended that the installation of ‘No Stopping’ restrictions be approved, in order to deter illegal parking blocking the access to these roadways.

 

Officer’s Recommendation

 

THAT the installation of full-time ‘No Stopping’ restrictions in Tempe Recreation Reserve along the northern and southern sides of the access road between the existing Shared Path and the access gates to the roadways be APPROVED, in order to deter illegal parking blocking access and improve vehicular access to the roadways.

 

DISCUSSION

 

The representative for the Member for Heffron advised that vehicles are driving across the footpath onto Tempe Reserve. This matter will be referred to the Trees, Parks and Sportsfields section for their attention and action.

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT the installation of full-time ‘No Stopping’ restrictions in Tempe Recreation Reserve along the northern and southern sides of the access road between the existing Shared Path and the access gates to the roadways be APPROVED, in order to deter illegal parking blocking access and improve vehicular access to the roadways.

 

For motion: Unanimous

 

 

 

LTC0818 Item 3 Big Bike Day 2018 Special Event (Leichhardt and Balmain Ward/ Balmain Electorate/ Leichhardt LAC)

SUMMARY

As part of NSW Bike Week 2018, Council is running ‘Big Bike Day’, a celebration of cycling. Big Bike Day is to be held on Sunday, 23 September 2018.

 

Officer’s Recommendation

 

THAT:

 

1.       The Big Bike Day 2018 event proposed to be held on Sunday, 23 September 2018 be supported; and

 

2.       Council’s Environmental Officer seeks consent from the Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) for the portion of the route through Callan Park.

 

DISCUSSION

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT:

 

1.       The Big Bike Day 2018 event proposed to be held on Sunday, 23 September 2018 be supported; and

 

2.       Council’s Environmental Officer seeks consent from the Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) for the portion of the route through Callan Park.

 

For motion: Unanimous

 

 

LTC0818 Item 4         Dixson Avenue, Dulwich Hill – Proposed Traffic Calming Design Plan 10005 - Improving pedestrian safety at its intersection with Old Canterbury Road   (Ashfield Ward/ Summer Hill Electorate/ Ashfield & Inner West LAC)

SUMMARY

A detailed design plan has been finalised for the proposed traffic calming improvements in Dixson Avenue, Dulwich Hill at its intersection with Old Canterbury Road, as part of the Dulwich Hill North LATM study implementation. The proposal to install kerb extensions and construct an entry threshold treatment (at-grade) to improve motorists’ visibility of pedestrians will improve pedestrian safety and traffic conditions at this location

 

Consultation was undertaken with owners and occupiers of properties adjacent the intersection regarding the proposal. A summary of the consultation results are presented in this report for consideration. It is recommended that the proposed detailed design plan be approved.

 

Officer’s Recommendation

 

THAT the detailed design plan of the kerb extension with a new at-grade threshold and associated signs and line markings at the intersection of Dixson Avenue and Old Canterbury Road, Dulwich Hill (as per the attached design plan No. 10005) be APPROVED.

 

DISCUSSION

 

Public speaker: Ms Carolyn Ridley attended at 10:08am.

 

Ms Ridley stated that she does not support the proposed design and made the following comments:

 

·    Only one option was proposed in the consultation letter she received

·    Closing the road would address pedestrian and vehicle safety issues in the street and would be more cost effective than the proposed design.

·    Not everyone in Dixson Street speaks English and some residents would have had difficulty understanding the consultation letter and the proposal.

·    The current proposal would result in loss of two parking spaces. There is potential to retain one of the parking spaces if the kerb extension was reduced.

 

(Ms Ridley left at 10:13am)

 

 

 

Public speaker: Mr Sava Savcic attended at 10:14am.

 

Mr Savcic stated that he supports the recommendation and stated that:

 

·    The proposed design will make it safer for pedestrians including young children and elderly pedestrians

·    His father nearly lost his life due to a motorist speeding towards Dixson Street and colliding with his father’s vehicle

·    In response to the consultation letter, he sent a petition to Council with signatures from residents who supported the proposal.

·    Visibility is poor when exiting his property on Old Canterbury Road due to parking permitted close to his driveway. He requested Council relocate the ‘No Stopping’ sign further from his driveway to improve sight lines.

 

Clr Da Cruz asked the speaker whether there are residents with language difficulties in the street. Mr Savcic stated that language is not an issue and residents he spoke to understood the proposal and supported it.

 

(Mr Savcic left at 10:17am)

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT the detailed design plan of the kerb extension with a new at-grade threshold and associated signs and line markings at the intersection of Dixson Avenue and Old Canterbury Road, Dulwich Hill (as per the attached design plan No. 10005) be APPROVED.

 

For motion: Unanimous

 

 

LTC0818 Item 5 Sydney Steel Road, Marrickville – Sydney Metro City and Southwest Project - Proposed Angled Parking and pedestrian thoroughfare (Marrickville Ward/Summer Hill Electorate/Inner West LAC)

SUMMARY

Sydney Steel Road, Marrickville contains one of the Sydney Metro City and Southwest construction sites, specifically servicing the Precast Facility for the Tunnel and Station Excavation contractor for TfNSW. Concerns have been raised regarding pedestrian safety when exiting from the shared path connecting Sydney Steel Road to Shirlow Street and a request has been received to provide a safe access path for users of the shared path facility which connects these two roads. 

 

In addition, the area on the western side of Sydney Steel Road has been used as informal 90° angled parking area for many years and with the Sydney Metro site in operation, this angle parking area is proposed to be formalised with ‘90° angle parking rear to kerb vehicles under 6m only’ restrictions. The existing ‘No Parking’ restrictions will now be extended to encompass the newly created turning head at the southern end of Sydney Steel Road, Marrickville.

 

It is also proposed to install wheel stops along the rear of the angle parking spaces to provide a pathway to allow pedestrians to gain access to the existing footpath at the eastern end of Sydney Steel Road. This pathway would provide a facility that is physically separated from vehicle traffic and improve safety at this location.

 

 

 

Officer’s Recommendation

 

THAT:

 

1.   The installation of full-time ‘No Parking’ restrictions be installed along the turning head of Sydney Steel Road be approved to allow for large vehicles to perform a U-turn with safety;

2.   ‘900 angle parking rear to kerb Vehicles under 6m only’ restrictions (approximately 100 metres in length) be installed on the western side of Sydney Steel Road between the ‘No Parking’ restrictions and the existing footpath to improve the safety of motorists exiting these spaces;

3.   Wheel stops be installed along the length of the angle parking area to provide a separated pathway for pedestrians;

4.   Cost of the works be borne by Sydney Metro City and Southwest: and

5.   Sydney Metro City and Southwest be notified in terms of this report.

 

DISCUSSION

 

The representative for the Inner West Bicycle Coalition requested that Council consider installing  bicycle logos on Sydney Steel Road to alert motorists that cyclists use the road.

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT:

 

1.   The installation of full-time ‘No Parking’ restrictions be installed along the turning head of Sydney Steel Road be approved to allow for large vehicles to perform a U-turn with safety;

2.   ‘900 angle parking rear to kerb Vehicles under 6m only’ restrictions (approximately 100 metres in length) be installed on the western side of Sydney Steel Road between the ‘No Parking’ restrictions and the existing footpath to improve the safety of motorists exiting these spaces;

3.   Wheel stops be installed along the length of the angle parking area to provide a separated pathway for pedestrians;

4.   Cost of the works be borne by Sydney Metro City and Southwest: and

5.   Sydney Metro City and Southwest be notified in terms of this report.

 

For motion: Unanimous

 

 

LTC0818 Item 6 Moore Street at Ainsworth Street, Leichhardt - Proposed 'No Stopping' zones (Leichhardt Ward/ Balmain Electorate/ Leichhardt LAC)

SUMMARY

Council has received a request to signpost the statutory ‘No Stopping’ restrictions on Moore Street at the intersection of Ainsworth street, Leichhardt in order to prevent illegal parking and improve sight lines.

 

Officer’s Recommendation

 

THAT:

 

1.   A 12m ‘No Stopping’ zone be installed on the northern side of Moore Street, east of Ainsworth Street; and

 

2.   A 10m ‘No Stopping’ zone on the northern side of Moore Street, west of Ainsworth Street.

 

DISCUSSION

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT:

 

1.   A 12m ‘No Stopping’ zone be installed on the northern side of Moore Street, east of Ainsworth Street; and

 

2.   A 10m ‘No Stopping’ zone on the northern side of Moore Street, west of Ainsworth Street.

 

For motion: Unanimous

 

 

 

LTC0818 Item 7 Bedwin Road/ Edinburgh Road/ Edgeware Road, Marrickville – Sydney Metro City and Southwest Project – Temporary traffic Signal installation and associated changes to line markings and parking restrictions (Marrickville Ward/Summer Hill Electorate/Inner West LAC)

SUMMARY

A detailed design plan has been approved by RMS for the temporary traffic signal installation at the intersection of Bedwin Road / Edinburgh Road, Marrickville as part of the Sydney Metro City and Southwest infrastructure project. These traffic signals were identified as a safety improvement to the intersection in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the operation of the Marrickville Tunnel Boring Machines (TBM) launch site and the operation of the precast segment factory for the tunnel lining. It is recommended that the proposed detailed design plans consisting of line marking and signposting be approved and that the temporary traffic signals be endorsed.

 

Officer’s Recommendation

 

THAT:

 

1.   The design plans for the temporary traffic signals at the intersection of Bedwin Road / Edinburgh Road/ Edgeware Road, Marrickville (as per the attached design plan No. 6201) be ENDORSED;

 

2.   The applicant is to design the intersection pavement to be a slip resistant due to curve linear nature of the intersection; 

 

3.   Council request RMS to make the signals permanent at this location;

 

4.   The cost of the installation of the traffic signals and reconstruction of slip resistant pavement through the intersection be borne by Sydney Metro City and Southwest; and

 

5.   Sydney Metro City and Southwest be notified in terms of this report.

 

DISCUSSION

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT:

 

1.   The design plans for the temporary traffic signals at the intersection of Bedwin Road / Edinburgh Road/ Edgeware Road, Marrickville (as per the attached design plan No. 6201) be ENDORSED;

 

2.   The applicant is to design the intersection pavement to be a slip resistant due to curve linear nature of the intersection; 

 

3.   Council request RMS to make the signals permanent at this location;

 

4.   The cost of the installation of the traffic signals and reconstruction of slip resistant pavement through the intersection be borne by Sydney Metro City and Southwest; and

 

5.   Sydney Metro City and Southwest be notified in terms of this report.

 

For motion: Unanimous

 

 

LTC0818 Item 8 Constitution Road, Dulwich Hill – Proposed Splitter Islands and Central Median Design Plans (Ashfield Ward/Summer Hill Electorate/Ashfield & Inner West LAC)

SUMMARY

A detailed design plan has been finalised for the proposed traffic calming improvements in Constitution Road, Dulwich Hill, between Williams Parade and Denison Road, as part of the Dulwich Hill North LATM study implementation. The proposal for a central median island on Constitution Road with raised mountable splitter islands at the intersection of Constitution Road and Denison Road will improve safety and calm traffic.

 

Consultation was undertaken with owners and occupiers of properties adjacent to Constitution Road, regarding the proposal. A summary of the consultation results are presented in this report for consideration. It is recommended that the proposed detailed design plans be approved.

 

Officer’s Recommendation

 

THAT the design plans for the proposed central median island and raised mountable splitter islands with associated signs and line markings in Constitution Road, Dulwich Hill, between Williams Parade and Denison Road (as per the attached design plan No. 10008) be APPROVED.

 

DISCUSSION

 

Public speaker:  Mr Peter Cassilles attended at 10:34am.

 

Mr Cassilles stated that he generally supported the proposed changes; however, he had concerns with some technical aspects of the plan and stated that:

 

·    the north-western approach of the roundabout does not have a ‘No Stopping’ zone. This approach should be consistent with the other three approaches of the roundabout.

·    Sightlines are poor for drivers exiting the driveway of the unit complex on the corner of Constitution Road and Denison Road. There is no distance between the end of the driveway and the parking lane which allows vehicles to be parked up to the intersection. There is a bend in Constitution Road where the unit complex is situated so there is no sight distance for vehicles travelling north on the road.

·    Parking at the bend of Denison Road (close to Old Canterbury Road) also needs to be addressed. Vehicles are often parked back to back where the road bends at a 90 degree angle. The location needs to be investigated to check that this parking is safe and consistent with other locations. 

 

(Mr Cassilles left at 10:39am)

 

The RMS representative stated that RMS generally supports the recommendation; however, agreed with the speaker’s comments regarding missing ‘No Stopping’ signs and requested that ‘No Stopping’ zones be installed on all approaches to the roundabout. The representative also requested for confirmation that there is adequate distance for vehicles to pass between the proposed splitter islands and the existing parking lane on all approaches.

 

Council Officers stated that seven additional responses were received after the consultation period ended. Two respondents supported the proposal and five objected. The respondents who objected seemed to support the proposal; however wanted a pedestrian crossing to address pedestrian safety in addition to the proposed changes.

 

Clr Da Cruz noted that there are no refuge islands proposed at the roundabout. Council Officers advised that the splitter islands cannnot be widened to accommodate the full width of a pedestrian refuge island as required by technical directions of the RMS due to the narrow road.

 

The Committee members were advised that requests for a pedestrian crossing on Constitution Road can be investigated as a separate issue.

 

The Committee members agreed to incorporate the RMS request into the recommendation.

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT:

 

1.   the design plans for the proposed central median island and raised mountable splitter islands with associated signs and line markings in Constitution Road, Dulwich Hill, between Williams Parade and Denison Road (as per the attached design plan No. 10008) be APPROVED.

 

2.   ‘No Stopping’ zones be included at all approaches to the roundabout.

 

3.   Council Officers confirm with RMS that there is sufficient space between the proposed splitter islands and the existing parking lane for vehicles to pass through.

 

For motion: Unanimous

 

 

LTC0818 Item 9 Eltham Street, Dulwich Hill – Proposed Splitter Islands - Design Plans (Ashfield Ward/Summer Hill Electorate/Inner West LAC)

SUMMARY

A detailed design plan has been finalised for the proposed traffic calming improvements in Eltham Street, Dulwich Hill at its intersection with Denison Road, as part of the Dulwich Hill North LATM study implementation. The proposal for raised mountable splitter islands with associated signs and line markings on Eltham Street at Denison Road will improve safety and calm traffic.

 

Consultation was undertaken with owners and occupiers of properties adjacent to Eltham Street and Denison Road, regarding the proposal. A summary of the consultation results are presented in this report for consideration. It is recommended that the proposed detailed design plans be approved.

 

Officer’s Recommendation

 

THAT the design plans for the proposed raised mountable splitter islands with associated signs and line markings in Eltham Street, Dulwich Hill at its intersection with Denison Road (as per the attached design plan No. 10001) be APPROVED.

 

DISCUSSION

 

The RMS representative requested that ‘No Stopping’ zones be installed on all approaches to the roundabout and that Council confirm that there is adequate lane width for travelling between the splitter islands and the parking lane.

 

The Transit Systems representative stated that school buses use the roundabout and asked for confirmation that the buses will be able to pass through the intersection under the proposed design. Council Officers advised that the proposed splitter islands will be mountable to accommodate large vehicles.

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT the design plans for the proposed raised mountable splitter islands with associated signs and line markings in Eltham Street, Dulwich Hill at its intersection with Denison Road (as per the attached design plan No. 10001) be APPROVED.

 

For motion: Unanimous

 

 

 

LTC0818 Item 10  Wood Street, Ashfield - Proposed kerb extensions and rain garden          design plans (Ashfield Ward/ Summer Hill Electorate/ Ashfield LAC)

SUMMARY

Detailed design plans have been finalised for the proposed traffic calming improvements in Wood Street, Ashfield, as part of Council’s Capital Works Program for Kerb and Gutter. The proposal for kerb extensions, kerb and footpath renewal and a rain garden with associated signs and line marking will improve pedestrian safety and the streetscape amenity in the area

 

A notification was undertaken with owners and occupiers of properties in Wood Street, regarding the proposals. It is recommended that the proposed detailed design plans be approved.

 

Officer’s Recommendation

 

THAT the detailed design plans of the kerb extensions, kerb and footpath renewal and rain garden with associated signs and line markings in Wood Street, Ashfield (as per the attached design plan Nos. RC532A) be APPROVED.

 

 

DISCUSSION

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT the detailed design plans of the kerb extensions, kerb and footpath renewal and rain garden with associated signs and line markings in Wood Street, Ashfield (as per the attached design plan Nos. RC532A) be APPROVED.

 

For motion: Unanimous

 

 

 

LTC0818 Item 11  Temporary Road Closure to carryout sewer works on North Street,         Balmain (Balmain Ward/ Balmain Electorates/Leichhardt LAC)

SUMMARY

An application has been received from Ozzy States Pty Ltd for the temporary full road closure of North Street (between Cardwell Street and Darling Street) Balmain between 9am and 5pm, Monday, 3 September to Saturday, 8 September 2018 (one week); with a further two weeks of contingency from Monday, 10 September to Saturday, 22 September 2018 in order to carryout sewer works on North Street, Balmain. It is recommended that the proposed temporary road closure be approved, subject to the conditions outlined in this report.

 

Officer’s Recommendation

 

THAT the proposed  temporary full road closure of North Street (between Cardwell Street and Darling Street), Balmain between 9am and 5pm, Monday, 3 September to Saturday, 8 September 2018 (one week) with a further two weeks of contingency from Monday, 10 September to Saturday, 22 September 2018 be approved, in order to carryout sewer works on North Street, Balmain, subject to the following conditions:

 

1.       A Traffic Management Plan (TMP) be submitted by the applicant to the Roads and Maritime Services for consideration and approval;

2.       A Traffic Control Plan (TCP) which has been prepared by a certified Traffic Controller, is to be submitted to Council for review with a copy of the Traffic Controllers certification number attached to the plan, not less than 5 days prior to implementation of closure;

3.       A Road Occupancy License be obtained by the applicant from the Roads and Maritime Services’ Transport Management Centre;

4.       Notice of the proposed closure be forwarded by the applicant to the NSW Police, Fire and Rescue NSW and the NSW Ambulance Services;

5.       Notification signs advising of the proposed road closures and new traffic arrangements to be strategically installed and maintained by the applicant at each end of the street at least 7 days prior to the closure;

6.       All affected residents and businesses shall be notified in writing, by the applicant, of the proposed temporary road closure at least 28 days in advance of the closure with the applicant making reasonable provision for residents;

7.       Vehicular and pedestrian access for residents and businesses to their off-street car parking spaces be maintained where possible whilst site works are in progress;

8.       Adequate vehicular traffic control shall be provided for the protection and convenience of pedestrians and motorists including appropriate signage and flagging. Workers shall be specially designated for this role, as necessary to comply with this condition. This is to be carried out in accordance with the Australian Standard AS 1742.3 - Traffic Control Devices for works on roads;

9.       The holder of this approval shall indemnify the Council against all claims, damages and costs incurred by, or charges made against, the Council in respect to death or injury to any person or damage in any way arising out of this approval. In this regard, a public liability insurance policy for an amount not less than $20,000,000 for any one occurrence is to be obtained and is to note the Council as an interested party. The holder of this approval shall inform its insurer of the terms of this condition and submit a copy of the insurance policy to the Council prior to commencement of the work the subject of this approval;

10.     The operator of any unit exercising this approval shall have this approval with them and produce it if required along with any other relevant authority approvals granted in the connection with the work;

11.     Mobile cranes, cherry pickers or concrete boom pumps shall not stand within the public way for extended periods when not in operation under this approval;

12.     The operation of the mobile crane shall not give rise to an "offensive noise" as defined in the Protection of Environment Operations Act, 1997. Furthermore, vibrations and/or emission of gases that are created during its operations and which are a nuisance, or dangerous to public health are not permitted;

13.     All work is to be carried out in accordance with Work Cover requirements; and

14.     The costs to repair damages, as a result of these works, to Council's footway and roadway areas will be borne by the applicant.

 

DISCUSSION

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT the proposed  temporary full road closure of North Street (between Cardwell Street and Darling Street), Balmain between 9am and 5pm, Monday, 3 September to Saturday, 8 September 2018 (one week) with a further two weeks of contingency from Monday, 10 September to Saturday, 22 September 2018 be approved, in order to carryout sewer works on North Street, Balmain, subject to the following conditions:

 

1.       A Traffic Management Plan (TMP) be submitted by the applicant to the Roads and Maritime Services for consideration and approval;

2.       A Traffic Control Plan (TCP) which has been prepared by a certified Traffic Controller, is to be submitted to Council for review with a copy of the Traffic Controllers certification number attached to the plan, not less than 5 days prior to implementation of closure;

3.       A Road Occupancy License be obtained by the applicant from the Roads and Maritime Services’ Transport Management Centre;

4.       Notice of the proposed closure be forwarded by the applicant to the NSW Police, Fire and Rescue NSW and the NSW Ambulance Services;

5.       Notification signs advising of the proposed road closures and new traffic arrangements to be strategically installed and maintained by the applicant at each end of the street at least 7 days prior to the closure;

6.       All affected residents and businesses shall be notified in writing, by the applicant, of the proposed temporary road closure at least 28 days in advance of the closure with the applicant making reasonable provision for residents;

7.       Vehicular and pedestrian access for residents and businesses to their off-street car parking spaces be maintained where possible whilst site works are in progress;

8.       Adequate vehicular traffic control shall be provided for the protection and convenience of pedestrians and motorists including appropriate signage and flagging. Workers shall be specially designated for this role, as necessary to comply with this condition. This is to be carried out in accordance with the Australian Standard AS 1742.3 - Traffic Control Devices for works on roads;

9.       The holder of this approval shall indemnify the Council against all claims, damages and costs incurred by, or charges made against, the Council in respect to death or injury to any person or damage in any way arising out of this approval. In this regard, a public liability insurance policy for an amount not less than $20,000,000 for any one occurrence is to be obtained and is to note the Council as an interested party. The holder of this approval shall inform its insurer of the terms of this condition and submit a copy of the insurance policy to the Council prior to commencement of the work the subject of this approval;

10.     The operator of any unit exercising this approval shall have this approval with them and produce it if required along with any other relevant authority approvals granted in the connection with the work;

11.     Mobile cranes, cherry pickers or concrete boom pumps shall not stand within the public way for extended periods when not in operation under this approval;

12.     The operation of the mobile crane shall not give rise to an "offensive noise" as defined in the Protection of Environment Operations Act, 1997. Furthermore, vibrations and/or emission of gases that are created during its operations and which are a nuisance, or dangerous to public health are not permitted;

13.     All work is to be carried out in accordance with Work Cover requirements; and

14.     The costs to repair damages, as a result of these works, to Council's footway and roadway areas will be borne by the applicant.

 

For motion: Unanimous

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LTC0818 Item 12  Temporary Road Closure of Applebee Street, St Peters to carry out sewer works (Marrickville Ward/ Heffron Electorate/ Newtown LAC)

SUMMARY

At its meeting on 24 July 2018, Council endorsed the recommendation of the Traffic Committee to approve a temporary road closure by GJ Building and Contracting at Applebee Street (between Lackey Street and Hutchinson Street), St Peters periodically between 6:00pm to 11:00pm from Hutchinson Street to Short Street and between 7:00am to 5:30pm from Short Street to Lackey Street for a period of four weeks from 30/7/2018 till 31/8/2018 including two weeks of contingency to carry out sewer works associated with a development.

 

The applicant has subsequently requested an additional two week period for the road closure as the approved hours are less than that originally applied for.

 

Officer’s Recommendation

 

THAT the proposed  temporary full road closure of Applebee Street, St Peters (between Lackey Street and Hutchinson Street) periodically between 6:00pm to 11:00pm from Hutchinson Street to Short Street and/or 7:00am to 5:30pm from Short Street to Lackey Street for a period of four weeks from 30/7/2018 till 31/8/2018 with a further two weeks of contingency from 1/9/2018 till 14/9/2018 in order to carry out sewer works on Applebee Street, St Peters, be approved subject to the following conditions:

 

1.       A Traffic Management Plan (TMP) be submitted by the applicant to the Roads and Maritime Services for consideration and approval;

2.       A Traffic Control Plan (TCP) which has been prepared by a certified Traffic Controller, is to be submitted to Council for review with a copy of the Traffic Controllers certification number attached to the plan, not less than 5 days prior to implementation of closure;

3.       A Road Occupancy License be obtained by the applicant from the Roads and Maritime Services’ Transport Management Centre;

4.       Notice of the proposed closure be forwarded by the applicant to the NSW Police, the Fire and Rescue NSW and the NSW Ambulance Services;

5.       Notification signs advising of the proposed road closures and new traffic arrangements to be strategically installed and maintained by the applicant at each end of the street at least 7 days prior to the closure;

6.       All affected residents and businesses shall be notified in writing, by the applicant, of the proposed temporary road closure at least 7 days in advance of the closure with the applicant making reasonable provision for residents;

7.       Vehicular and pedestrian access for residents and businesses to their off-street car parking spaces be maintained where possible whilst site works are in progress;

8.       Adequate vehicular traffic control shall be provided for the protection and convenience of pedestrians and motorists including appropriate signage and flagging. Workers shall be specially designated for this role, as necessary to comply with this condition. This is to be carried out in accordance with the Australian Standard AS 1742.3 - Traffic Control Devices for works on roads;

9.       The holder of this approval shall indemnify the Council against all claims, damages and costs incurred by, or charges made against, the Council in respect to death or injury to any person or damage in any way arising out of this approval. In this regard, a public liability insurance policy for an amount not less than $20,000,000 for any one occurrence is to be obtained and is to note the Council as an interested party. The holder of this approval shall inform its insurer of the terms of this condition and submit a copy of the insurance policy to the Council prior to commencement of the work the subject of this approval;

10.     The operator of any unit exercising this approval shall have this approval with them and produce it if required along with any other relevant authority approvals granted in the connection with the work;

11.     Mobile cranes, cherry packers or concrete boom pumps shall not stand within the public way for extended periods when not in operation under this approval;

12.     The operation of the mobile crane shall not give rise to an "offensive noise" as defined in the Protection of Environment Operations Act, 1997. Furthermore, vibrations and/or emission of gases that are created during its operations and which are a nuisance, or dangerous to public health are not permitted;

13.     All work is to be carried out in accordance with Work Cover requirements; and

14.     The costs to repair damages, as a result of these works, to Council's footway and roadway areas will be borne by the applicant.

 

DISCUSSION

 

Council Officers advised that there are plans for a community street party in Applebee Street on 21 September, after the conclusion of the proposed sewer works. Council Officers stated that details of the proposed event will be submitted to the Committee for consideration via email.

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT the proposed  temporary full road closure of Applebee Street, St Peters (between Lackey Street and Hutchinson Street) periodically between 6:00pm to 11:00pm from Hutchinson Street to Short Street and/or 7:00am to 5:30pm from Short Street to Lackey Street for a period of four weeks from 30/7/2018 till 31/8/2018 with a further two weeks of contingency from 1/9/2018 till 14/9/2018 in order to carry out sewer works on Applebee Street, St Peters, be approved subject to the following conditions:

 

1.       A Traffic Management Plan (TMP) be submitted by the applicant to the Roads and Maritime Services for consideration and approval;

2.       A Traffic Control Plan (TCP) which has been prepared by a certified Traffic Controller, is to be submitted to Council for review with a copy of the Traffic Controllers certification number attached to the plan, not less than 5 days prior to implementation of closure;

3.       A Road Occupancy License be obtained by the applicant from the Roads and Maritime Services’ Transport Management Centre;

4.       Notice of the proposed closure be forwarded by the applicant to the NSW Police, the Fire and Rescue NSW and the NSW Ambulance Services;

5.       Notification signs advising of the proposed road closures and new traffic arrangements to be strategically installed and maintained by the applicant at each end of the street at least 7 days prior to the closure;

6.       All affected residents and businesses shall be notified in writing, by the applicant, of the proposed temporary road closure at least 7 days in advance of the closure with the applicant making reasonable provision for residents;

7.       Vehicular and pedestrian access for residents and businesses to their off-street car parking spaces be maintained where possible whilst site works are in progress;

8.       Adequate vehicular traffic control shall be provided for the protection and convenience of pedestrians and motorists including appropriate signage and flagging. Workers shall be specially designated for this role, as necessary to comply with this condition. This is to be carried out in accordance with the Australian Standard AS 1742.3 - Traffic Control Devices for works on roads;

9.       The holder of this approval shall indemnify the Council against all claims, damages and costs incurred by, or charges made against, the Council in respect to death or injury to any person or damage in any way arising out of this approval. In this regard, a public liability insurance policy for an amount not less than $20,000,000 for any one occurrence is to be obtained and is to note the Council as an interested party. The holder of this approval shall inform its insurer of the terms of this condition and submit a copy of the insurance policy to the Council prior to commencement of the work the subject of this approval;

10.     The operator of any unit exercising this approval shall have this approval with them and produce it if required along with any other relevant authority approvals granted in the connection with the work;

11.     Mobile cranes, cherry packers or concrete boom pumps shall not stand within the public way for extended periods when not in operation under this approval;

12.     The operation of the mobile crane shall not give rise to an "offensive noise" as defined in the Protection of Environment Operations Act, 1997. Furthermore, vibrations and/or emission of gases that are created during its operations and which are a nuisance, or dangerous to public health are not permitted;

13.     All work is to be carried out in accordance with Work Cover requirements; and

14.     The costs to repair damages, as a result of these works, to Council's footway and roadway areas will be borne by the applicant.

 

For motion: Unanimous

 

 

LTC0818 Item 13  Henry Lane, Lewisham - Proposed 'No Parking' restrictions         (Stanmore Ward/ Summer Hill Electorate/ Inner West LAC)

SUMMARY

Representations have been received from local residents for the installation of full time ‘No Parking’ restrictions in Henry Lane, Lewisham along the rear boundaries of Nos.15-19 Jubilee Street, as vehicular access to off-street parking is often blocked by parked vehicles in the laneway. Residents adjoining the subject section of laneway have been consulted and a revised proposal has been presented for the installation ‘No Parking’ restrictions in Henry Lane, across the rear boundaries of Nos.13-19 Jubilee Street, Lewisham. Residents have been notified of the revised proposal.

 

Officer’s Recommendation

 

THAT a 24m ‘No Parking’ restriction on the northern side of Henry Lane along the rear boundaries of Nos.13 to 19 Jubilee Street, Lewisham be approved.

 

DISCUSSION

 

Public speakers: Mr Cameron Crew and another resident attended at  10:39am.

 

Mr Crew stated that he does not support the recommendation and stated that:

 

·         There are a number of apartment blocks close to Henry Lane and residents of those apartment blocks often utilise parking in Jubilee Street which has made it difficult for Jubliee Street residents to find parking even though there is a Resident Parking Scheme in place.

·         Commuters often park in local streets as Lewisham train station does not have commuter parking.

·         He understands that service vehicles need to use the lane; however, parking is an issue in many areas of the Inner West and if restrictions were to be implemented for all these areas,  half of Newtown lanes would have parking restrictions.

·         He believe that the request for parking restrictions in Henry Lane is due to the parking of a boat in the lane which has upset a neighbour. He believes that this is a matter of neighbours communicating and is not a Council issue.

·         He encourages Council to maintain parking in the area including in Henry Lane.

 

The second resident in attendance stated that he supported the proposal and stated that:

 

·         Rear access from Henry Lane is regularly blocked by parked cars

·         Residents of Jubilee Street and Henry Street are part of the Resident Parking Scheme and there should not be a need for those residents to park in Henry Lane.

·         Commuters and residents of nearby apartments often park in the laneway.

·         Parking of cars and trailers in the lane impedes the flow of traffic and causes poor visibility for vehicles moving through the lane, especially when children play in the laneway.

·         The sandstone gutters in the lane have been damaged over time due to vehicles hitting the kerbs whilst parking which would cost Council significant amounts to repair.

 

(The residents left at 10:47am)

 

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT the installation of a 24m ‘No Parking’ restriction on the northern side of Henry Lane along the rear boundaries of Nos.13 to 19 Jubilee Street, Lewisham be approved.

 

For motion: Unanimous

 

 

 

LTC0818 Item 14  Edith Street, St Peters - Proposed 'No Parking' and 'No Stopping'           Restrictions    (Marrickville Ward/ Heffron Electorate/ Inner West   LAC)

SUMMARY

Following receipt of a petition, site investigations and consultation, Council is proposing to implement ‘No Parking’ and ‘No Stopping’ restrictions in Edith Street, St Peters to allow for improved vehicular access for properties in the narrow section of the street and at associated intersections. Residents have been notified of the proposal to install ‘No Parking’ in sections of Edith Street on the northern and southern sides and ‘No Stopping’ restrictions at several intersections. It is recommended that the proposal be approved.

 

 

 

 

Officer’s Recommendation

 

THAT the following changes to parking conditions be approved:

1.   Conversion of unrestricted parking to ‘No Parking’ on the northern side of Edith Street across the frontages of property No.5 to property No.33 Edith Street, St Peters;

2.   Conversion of unrestricted parking to ‘No Parking’ on the southern side of Edith Street  between Roberts Street and Princes Highway, St Peters;

3.   Implementation of 10m ‘No Stopping’ restrictions on the southern side of Edith Street east of Roberts Street, St Peters; and

4.   Implementation of 10m ‘No Stopping’ restrictions on the southern side of Edith Street west of Princes Highway, St Peters.

 

DISCUSSION

 

Council Officers tabled an additional comment that was received after the conclusion of the consultation period. A resident commented that the existing narrow footpath should be removed to widen the street. The Committee noted the resident’s comment.

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT the following changes to parking conditions be approved:

1.   Conversion of unrestricted parking to ‘No Parking’ on the northern side of Edith Street across the frontages of property No.5 to property No.33 Edith Street, St Peters;

2.   Conversion of unrestricted parking to ‘No Parking’ on the southern side of Edith Street  between Roberts Street and Princes Highway, St Peters;

3.   Implementation of 10m ‘No Stopping’ restrictions on the southern side of Edith Street east of Roberts Street, St Peters; and

4.   Implementation of 10m ‘No Stopping’ restrictions on the southern side of Edith Street west of Princes Highway, St Peters.

 

For motion: Unanimous

 

 

LTC0818 Item 15  Change in Parking Meter Operational Hours in side streets of       Leichhardt, Rozelle and Balmain (Leichhardt and Balmain Ward / Balmain Electorate / Leichhardt LAC)

SUMMARY

Council at its meeting held on 13 March 2018 considered a report regarding parking meter operations in Leichhardt, Rozelle and Balmain and subsequently resolved to turn off parking meters at 7pm on Norton Street, Leichhardt; Darling Street, Rozelle and Darling Street, Balmain.

 

The Council also resolved to initiate consultation with the community, including Chamber of Commerce, businesses and surrounding residents on the proposal to turn off parking meters at 7pm in the adjoining side streets and extend 30 minute parking to those streets and receive a report back on the outcome of that consultation.

 

A separate report will be prepared to Council for its meeting to be held on 28 August 2018 outlining the outcome of this consultation.

 

This report identifies the regulatory signage that would need to be changed, should Council proceed with the proposal to turn off the parking meters in the side streets in Balmain, Rozelle and Leichhardt at 7pm.

 

Officer’s Recommendation

 

THAT in the event that Council resolves to switch off the parking meters in the side streets of Balmain, Rozelle and Leichhardt at 7pm, the changes to regulatory signage indicated in Table 1 of this report be supported.

 

DISCUSSION

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT in the event that Council resolves to switch off the parking meters in the side streets of Balmain, Rozelle and Leichhardt at 7pm, the changes to regulatory signage indicated in Table 1 of this report be supported.

 

For motion: Unanimous

 

 

 

LTC0818 Item 16   Smith Lane, Summer Hill - Proposed 'No Parking' restrictions.
    (Ashfield Ward/ Summer Hill Electrorate/ Ashfield LAC)

SUMMARY

Council has received concerns from a resident regarding vehicles parking on the northern side of Smith Lane along the rear boundaries of Nos.58 to 62 Smith Street and subsequently impeding driveway access to these properties.

 

Officer’s Recommendation

 

THAT the installation of full-time ‘No Parking’ restrictions (approx. 15 metres in length) on the northern side of Smith Lane, along the rear boundaries of Nos. 58 to 62 Smith Street, Summer Hill, be approved.

 

DISCUSSION

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT the installation of full-time ‘No Parking’ restrictions (approx. 15 metres in length) on the northern side of Smith Lane, along the rear boundaries of Nos. 58 to 62 Smith Street, Summer Hill, be approved.

 

For motion: Unanimous

 

 

 

 

LTC0818 Item 17       Minor Traffic Facilities (All Wards/All Electorates/All LACs)

SUMMARY

This report considers minor traffic facility applications received by Inner West Council, and includes ‘Disabled Parking’ and ‘Works Zone’ requests.

 

Officer’s Recommendation

 

THAT:

 

1.   The 6m ‘Disabled Parking’ space in front of No.118 Cecily Street, Lilyfield be removed as the zone is no longer required;

2.   A 5.5m ‘Disabled Parking’ zone be installed in front of No.79 Flood Street, Leichhardt (adjacent to the neighbouring driveway);

3.   A 3.6m (45-degree angle parking) ‘Disabled Parking’ zone be installed in front of No.173 Trafalgar Street, Annandale;

4.   A 6m ‘Disabled Parking’ zone be installed in front of No.35 Darling Street, Balmain East;

5.   A 5.5m ‘Disabled Parking’ zone be installed on Norman Street on the side boundary of No.72A Terry Street, Rozelle;

6.   A 6m ‘Disability Parking’ zone be installed on the southern side of Robert Street, Petersham adjacent to property no .36 Charles Street, Petersham;

7.   A 6m ‘Disability Parking’ zone be installed on the eastern side of Australia Street infront of property no. 94 Australia Street, Camperdown;

8.   A 12 ‘Works Zone 7.00am – 5.30pm Mon-Sat’ be installed on the southern side of Applebee street adjacent to property no.63 - 81 Princes Highway, St Peters;

9.   A 9m ‘Works Zone 7.00am – 5.00pm Mon-Fri, 7.00am – 1.00pm Sat’ be installed in front of No.14 and No.14A Susan Lane, Annandale;

10. A 9m ‘Works Zone 7.00am – 5.00pm Mon-Fri, 7.00am – 1.00pm Sat’ be installed in front of No.63 and No.65 Rowntree Street, Balmain;

11. A 9m ‘Works Zone 7.00am – 5.00pm Mon-Fri, 7.00am – 1.00pm Sat’ be installed on Clay street on the side of No.52 Reynolds Street, Balmain;

12. A 8m ‘Works Zone 7.00am – 6.00pm Mon-Fri and 7.00am – 1.00pm Sat’ be installed in front No.16 Spencer Street, Summer Hill; and

13. A 9m ‘Works Zone ‘7.00am – 6.00pm Mon-Fri and 7.00am – 1.00pm Sat’ be installed in front of No.9 Leopold Street, Croydon Park.

 

DISCUSSION

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT:

 

1.   The 6m ‘Disabled Parking’ space in front of No.118 Cecily Street, Lilyfield be removed as the zone is no longer required;

2.   A 5.5m ‘Disabled Parking’ zone be installed in front of No.79 Flood Street, Leichhardt (adjacent to the neighbouring driveway);

3.   A 3.6m (45-degree angle parking) ‘Disabled Parking’ zone be installed in front of No.173 Trafalgar Street, Annandale;

4.   A 6m ‘Disabled Parking’ zone be installed in front of No.35 Darling Street, Balmain East;

5.   A 5.5m ‘Disabled Parking’ zone be installed on Norman Street on the side boundary of No.72A Terry Street, Rozelle;

6.   A 6m ‘Disability Parking’ zone be installed on the southern side of Robert Street, Petersham adjacent to property no .36 Charles Street, Petersham;

7.   A 6m ‘Disability Parking’ zone be installed on the eastern side of Australia Street infront of property no. 94 Australia Street, Camperdown;

8.   A 12 ‘Works Zone 7.00am – 5.30pm Mon-Sat’ be installed on the southern side of Applebee street adjacent to property no.63 - 81 Princes Highway, St Peters;

9.   A 9m ‘Works Zone 7.00am – 5.00pm Mon-Fri, 7.00am – 1.00pm Sat’ be installed in front of No.14 and No.14A Susan Lane, Annandale;

10. A 9m ‘Works Zone 7.00am – 5.00pm Mon-Fri, 7.00am – 1.00pm Sat’ be installed in front of No.63 and No.65 Rowntree Street, Balmain;

11. A 9m ‘Works Zone 7.00am – 5.00pm Mon-Fri, 7.00am – 1.00pm Sat’ be installed on Clay street on the side of No.52 Reynolds Street, Balmain;

12. A 8m ‘Works Zone 7.00am – 6.00pm Mon-Fri and 7.00am – 1.00pm Sat’ be installed in front No.16 Spencer Street, Summer Hill; and

13. A 9m ‘Works Zone ‘7.00am – 6.00pm Mon-Fri and 7.00am – 1.00pm Sat’ be installed in front of No.9 Leopold Street, Croydon Park.

 

For motion: Unanimous

 

 

LTC0818 Item 18   Dudley Street, Dulwich Hill - Improving road safety in the street adjacent to the pedestrian refuge and temporary 'Works Zone'                                   (Marrickville Ward/ Summer Hill electorate / Inner West LAC)

SUMMARY

Council is proposing to install full time ‘No Stopping’ restrictions at the section of Dudley Street between Wardell Road and the existing ‘Bus Zone’ (southern side of Dudley Street) in order to provide adequate sightlines between vehicles and pedestrians crossing Dudley Street at Wardell Road. In the process the ‘Bus Zone’ will be shortened by 4 metres and moved 6 metres to the west. It is envisioned that the amendments will improve road safety at this location.

 

Concurrently, Council has been approached for a ‘Works Zone’ for the development at Nos.6-12A Dudley Street, Dulwich Hill. The ‘Works Zone’ is temporary and is proposed immediately east of the ‘Bus Zone’ on the southern side of Dudley Street, to assist in the delivery of materials to the site in a safe manner. The ‘Works Zone’ will be provided for a minimum of 6 months.

 

The existing ‘Loading Zone’ (9m) and short term parking (18m) will be relocated to the northern side of Dudley Street adjacent to the ‘Bus Zone’ for the duration of the works.

 

At the conclusion of the ‘Works Zone’ this parking will be reinstated to the south side of Dudley Street, immediately east of the ‘Bus Zone’, replacing the ‘Works Zone’ and short term 1-hour parking restrictions.

 

It is recommended that the proposed changes be approved in order to improve road safety at this location and accommodate the temporary ‘Works Zone’. 

 

 

Officer’s Recommendation

 

THAT:

 

1.   Full time ‘No Stopping’ restrictions be installed for a length of 26 metres on the southern side of Dudley Street east of Wardell Road;

 

2.   The existing ‘Bus Zone’ on the southern side of Dudley Street be shortened by 4 metres and relocated west from its present position to adjoin the proposed ‘No Stopping’ restrictions;

3.   A temporary 12 metre length ‘Works Zone 7AM – 5.30PM Mon-Sat’ be installed east of the relocated ‘Bus Zone’ on the southern side of Dudley Street adjacent to the development site at No. 6-12A Dudley Street to assist in the delivery of materials to the site in a safe manner;

 

4.   The cost of the supply, installation and removal of the signage associated with the Works Zone is to be borne by the applicants Australex Group Pty Ltd in accordance with Council’s Fees and Charges;

 

5.   The existing 9 metre length ‘Loading Zone 8.30am-6pm Mon-Fri 7.30am- 12.30pm Sat’ and the 18 metre length of short term ‘P30 minutes 8.30am-6.00pm Mon-Fri 8.30am-12.30pm Sat’ on the southern side of Dudley Street  be temporarily relocated to the northern side of Dudley Street adjacent to the existing Bus Zone and be reinstated on the southern side of Dudley Street (east of the relocated Bus Zone) at the expiration of the temporary Works Zone; and

 

6.   All applicants and respondents be notified in terms of this report. 

 

 

DISCUSSION

 

The Committee members were advised that the relocation of the bus stop north of the existing bus stop will be paid for by the proponent. The representative for Transit Systems stated that the bus stop must be installed as per the typical bus stop layout, e.g. with tactile tiles on footpath.

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT:

 

1.   Full time ‘No Stopping’ restrictions be installed for a length of 26 metres on the southern side of Dudley Street east of Wardell Road;

 

2.   The existing ‘Bus Zone’ on the southern side of Dudley Street be shortened by 4 metres and relocated west from its present position to adjoin the proposed ‘No Stopping’ restrictions;

 

3.   A temporary 12 metre length ‘Works Zone 7AM – 5.30PM Mon-Sat’ be installed east of the relocated ‘Bus Zone’ on the southern side of Dudley Street adjacent to the development site at No. 6-12A Dudley Street to assist in the delivery of materials to the site in a safe manner;

 

4.   The cost of the supply, installation and removal of the signage associated with the Works Zone is to be borne by the applicants Australex Group Pty Ltd in accordance with Council’s Fees and Charges;

 

5.   The existing 9 metre length ‘Loading Zone 8.30am-6pm Mon-Fri 7.30am- 12.30pm Sat’ and the 18 metre length of short term ‘P30 minutes 8.30am-6.00pm Mon-Fri 8.30am-12.30pm Sat’ on the southern side of Dudley Street  be temporarily relocated to the northern side of Dudley Street adjacent to the existing Bus Zone and be reinstated on the southern side of Dudley Street (east of the relocated Bus Zone) at the expiration of the temporary Works Zone; and

 

6.   All applicants and respondents be notified in terms of this report. 

 

For motion: Unanimous

 

 

LTC0818 Item 19  Cahill Street, Annandale - Extension of 'No Stopping' Zone           (Leichhardt Ward/ Balmain Electorate/ Leichhardt LAC)

SUMMARY

Council has received a request to extend the existing ‘No Stopping’ zone on the southern side of Cahill Street (in front of No.1 Cahill Street) by 1m to the east in order to allow truck access to the property.

 

Officer’s Recommendation

 

THAT the existing ‘No Stopping’ zone on the southern side of Cahill Street (in front of Nos. 1 & 3 Cahill Street) be extended by 1m to the east.

 

DISCUSSION

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT the existing ‘No Stopping’ zone on the southern side of Cahill Street (in front of Nos. 1 & 3 Cahill Street) be extended by 1m to the east.

 

For motion: Unanimous

 

 

LTC0818 Item 20  Palace Street, Ashfield-Installation of 'Bus Zone' & 'No Stopping'            restrictions.
(Ashfield Ward/Summer Hill Electorate/Ashfield LAC)

SUMMARY

Bus Zone’ signage and statutory ‘No Stopping’ restrictions are proposed at an existing Bus Stop on the southern side of Palace Street near the corner of Holden Street, Ashfield, on the side boundary of No.101 Holden Street. The signage would assist to regulate parking and allow buses to safely pull in and out of the Bus Stop.

 

 

 

 

 

Officer’s Recommendation

 

THAT:

 

1.   Statutory ‘No Stopping’ restriction of 10 metres be installed on the southern side of Palace Street, west of Holden Street, Ashfield; and

 

2.   A 22 metre length ‘Bus Zone’ restriction be installed on the southern side of Palace Street, west of Holden Street (following the Statutory ‘No Stopping’ restriction). 

 

DISCUSSION

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT:

 

1.   Statutory ‘No Stopping’ restriction of 10 metres be installed on the southern side of Palace Street, west of Holden Street, Ashfield; and

 

2.   A 22 metre length ‘Bus Zone’ restriction be installed on the southern side of Palace Street, west of Holden Street (following the Statutory ‘No Stopping’ restriction). 

 

For motion: Unanimous

 

 

LTC0818 Item 21    728-750 Princes Highway, Tempe – Proposed Bunnings Hardware &     Building Supplies Store (Marrickville Ward / Summer Hill Electorate / Marrickville LAC)

SUMMARY

Council has received a development application for 728-750 Princes Highway, Tempe to partially demolish the rear of the existing building, construction of a new building form and adaptively reuse the site for use as a 2 level hardware and building supplies store with undercroft car parking, erection of signage, boundary adjustments to provide a slip lane from the Princes Highway into Smith Street and the widening of Smith Street on the north-eastern side.

 

A report was previously considered by the Traffic Committee at its meeting held 5 October 2017 and this is a review of the traffic and parking contentions previously raised in relation to the development application. Subsequent new plans have also been submitted.

 

Comments of the Local Traffic Committee will be referred to Council’s Development Assessment Section for consideration in determining the Development Application.

 

Officer’s Recommendation

 

THAT the report be received and noted.

 

DISCUSSION

 

Public speakers: Mr Ken Moxham, Ms Jenny Griffith, Mr Graham Griffith, Mr Philip Drew and

Mr Ross Nettle attended at 10:18 am.

 

Mr Moxham, resident of Smith Street, stated that he is concerned with the impact of traffic generated in Smith Street by the proposed Bunnings development in Tempe. He tabled comments as summarised below:

 

·    Traffic generated as a result of the proposed development is projected to be approximately 1,100 an hour, equating to approximately 14,000 movements per day. This contrasts with the current rate of 1,100 vehicles movements per day in Smith Street.

·    The impact upon Smith Street residents through vehicular noise, headlights, pollution, danger to parked cars is frightening, especially considering that trailers, trucks and semitrailers will be using the street.

·    The DA expects queuing of up to 5 semitrailers and 4 HRVs on their proposed ramp. Vehicles queuing along Smith Street will cause issues for residents safely parking or exiting their vehicles from their properties.

·    It often takes two traffic light cycles to enter Princes Highway from Smith Street during peak periods due to congestion on Princes Highway. Widening Smith Street will not improve this situation.

·    The proposed widening of Smith Street and the inclusion of the slip lane and ramp will result in the loss of about 16 parking spaces. As a Civil Celebrant, most of his wedding clients come to his residence and parking reasonably close is essential. He has lost customers due to current congestion. If the current Bunnings traffic plan goes ahead, his business will suffer.

·    Suggest that Bunnings come to an arrangement with IKEA to use Princes Highway for ingress and egress like the Decathlon store has done. Alternatively, Bellevue Street, a non-residential street, could be used for this purpose.

 

Mr Moxham tabled a petition from residents of Tempe concerned with the traffic implications on residential streets surrounding the proposed Bunnings development and proposed that all traffic entering and exiting Bunnings should only be from an access point on the Princes Highway.

 

Mr Griffith, resident of Barden Street, tabled comments as summarised below:

 

·    An alternative public entry/exit option via the Princes Highway has been inadvertently overlooked by Council in favour of the Bunnings plans which force most customer traffic into Smith Street.

·    The Bunnings plans shows there will be a curved south facing driveway onto the Princes Highway’s northern tip of the proposed development. This will preclude south bound traffic entering the proposed development from Princes Highway. 

·    The plan has a similarly deliberate funnelling of traffic into Smith Street with a curved entry into the proposed development. However, the same entry point on the south eastern tip has an adjacent exit path that is not curved back towards Princes Highway. It is believed that this is a deliberate ploy to keep the movement of exiting vehicles as efficient as possible whether they turn right towards the Princes Highway or left towards South Street.

·    Despite Smith Street being relatively wide, all other adjacent streets are narrow and do not support two-way traffic. With the potential for traffic overflow into South Street, the risk to pedestrian safety is high as there are no continuous footpaths on South Street.

·    There should be consideration given to the fact that Smith and South Streets are part of Council’s designated Local Route 7 cycling route.

·    He requested that Council consider a recommendation that promotes an alternative plan whereby Bunnings uses an entry/exit point from the proposed development’s northern boundary.

 

Ms Griffith stated the following:

 

·    South Street is a designated bike path which does not have a footpath, forcing pedestrians to walk on the narrow road.

·    She often has to negotiate bikes, cars and small trucks when she walks along South Street to shops, the train station or to walk her grandchildren to Tempe Recreation Reserve. If the Bunnings proposal goes ahead, she would have to negotiate the extra vehicle movements in South Street resulting from the development.

·    The back streets of east Tempe are dangerous enough and won’t cope with any extra traffic.

 

Comments from residents, Ms Catherine Stewart, Ms Andrea Fernandes and Ms Stephanie Ward, who could not attend the meeting, were tabled as summarised below:

 

Ms Stewart’s comments included the following:

 

·    The expansion of the development footprint to include the existing footpath and a traffic/parking lane on the northern side of Smith Street puts commercial gain ahead of neighbourhood amenity.

·    When the approval for the slip lane was passed, it was intended to service the existing commercial premises which operated on Monday to Friday, 9am-5pm. The new development will run 7 days a week, 6am-9pm.

·    The RMS have indicated it will not approve additional traffic lights to allow a right hand turn from the highway at the northern IKEA entrance. This suggests that Smith Street will be the only option for northbound traffic to enter and exit the site.

·    The development will force high volumes of traffic into Smith Street and surrounding streets will be used as a rat run to Princes Highway.

·    The Tempe Parking Strategy 2012 noted Smith Street as being stressed during peak hour with parking occupancy in excess of 90%. This will be increased by the removal of a parking lane.

·    The current DA does not include a comprehensive traffic study.

·    The 2014 acoustic report is no longer current enough and a new report should be conducted to allow for changing noise patterns in the area.

 

Ms Fernandes’s comments included the following:

 

·    Tempe’s local streets are narrow, already congested and not designed for major traffic flow.

·    The proposal would create an unsafe and dangerous environment for pedestrians, including Tempe Public School students. Union Street, on which the school is located, would be used as a ‘rat-run’ over the Princes Highway.

·    Union Street is one-way with a narrow road and footpath. An increase of traffic onto Union Street would impact on the already congested Unwins Bridge Road and surrounding residential streets.

·    At the October 2017 LTC meeting, it was recommended a comprehensive traffic study further investigates the impact of this proposal on local residential streets such as Smith, Union, Foreman and South. She would like to know what has come of this recommendation and what this report has identified.

·    Requests that traffic experts work with the Tempe community to develop an alternative entry/exit that does not have an adverse impact on local freedom of movement, parking and child and pedestrian safety.

 

Ms Ward’s comments included the following:

 

·    There are concerns with the projected 1,100 vehicular movements and the impact this will have on Smith Street and other residential streets. This impact has not been properly examined despite the call for an updated traffic survey.

·    Families will be placed in dramatically increased danger when walking on their own streets trying to access local amenities if traffic volumes increase as projected. Smith Street and surrounds already suffer from aggressive driving which will only be exacerbated under the current proposal.

·    If Smith Street is allowed to be widened and used as a slip lane, Tempe will lose yet another bus stop forcing pedestrians to risk their personal safety on roads by having to walk even further.

·    The Committee needs to ask that Bunnings look at alternative solutions and that vehicular access must be restricted to the Princes Highway.

 

Mr Nettle, from Transport and Traffic Planning Associates, tabled a report addressing some of the issues raised by Council Officers which included the following:

 

·    The need to remove parking in Smith Street is due to the proposed left turn deceleration/slip lane from Princes Highway and the travel paths of the existing industrial trucks and future Bunnings trucks. This left turn treatment is a requirement of RMS and this proposal reflects the treatment which was incorporated in the previous bulky goods development scheme and was a specific requirement of that Development Consent.

·    The Bunnings scheme is to widen the western section of Smith Street on the northern side by dedication of part of the site frontage in order to facilitate traffic movements, widen the existing narrow footway and maintain as many parking spaces as possible. However, any further widening is precluded by the need to retain the historical building façade.

·    Aerial images provided and parking surveys undertaken show that parking from existing uses on the ‘Pretty Girl’ site create the parking demand on Smith Street, whereas on weekends there is significant on-street parking available.

·    A new proposed access arrangement diagram was provided showing the proposed new kerbline, road marking and ‘No Stopping’ restriction and that 7 parking spaces that will be lost as a result of providing the slip lane treatment.

·    There is no change to the proposed turning path of trucks using the Smith Street driveway. Under the current bulky goods approval, all trucks will come in and out of the Smith Street driveway, whereas in the Bunnings proposal, Bunnings trucks will only ingress from Smith Street and egress to Princes Highway as agreed with RMS.

·    Council proposes to install a shared path along Smith Street as part of the bike network link. Due to the narrow width of the existing footway, a shared path cannot be achieved. However, the widening of the footway as a result of dedication of land from Bunnings enables the shared path link to be achieved.

 

(The speakers left at 10.33am)

 

The representative for the Member for Heffron made the following comments:

 

·    The Member for Heffron is concerned with the appropriateness of the development due to its impact on the local residential area. He notes that the latest proposal fails to address concerns with the impact to residential streets particularly Union, South and Foreman Streets.

·    Correspondence from Mr Mark Ludbrooke, Vice President of the Tempe Public School P&C, was tabled. Mr Ludbrook is concerned with the impact the development will have on the school community. He noted that there have been a number of near misses from cars driving over the crossing on Union Street without stopping and vehicles have been observed driving in the wrong direction on this one-way street. The projected traffic movements will exacerbate the above mentioned issues and pose unacceptable safety risks to local children. Mr Ludbrooke urges Council to require that access to  and from  the development be via the Princes Highway or the non-residential Bellevue Street.

·    The DA comments that traffic on Princes Highway will reduce when the M5-Westconnex tunnel becomes operational. There is scepticism about predictions with traffic on Princes Highway subsequent to the opening of the M5-WestConnex as drivers often avoid tolled motorways, as observed with the reintroduction of the M4 toll and its impact on traffic on Parramatta Road.  

 

The representative for Transit Systems  made the following comments:

 

·    Transit Systems currently have a bus stop located along the Princes Highway where the proposed slip lane into Smith Street is located. On the drawings, on page 166 of the Agenda, it shows the bus stop being relocated north of the existing position, which Transit Systems agrees with.

·    Transit Systems requires that a minimum bus zone of 30 metres is provided and that the shelter is relocated to the new bus stop and adheres to the typical bus stop layout.  

·    It is assumed that this bus stop relocation will be paid for by the proponent.

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT the report be received and noted.

 

For motion: Unanimous

 

  

LATE ITEM

 

LTC0818 Item 22    Edgeware Road, Newtown - No.310 Request for 'Works Zone'    adjacent to construction site (All Wards/ All Electorates/ All         LACs)

 

Prepared By: Idris Hessam – Road Access Engineer

Authorised By: John Stephens - Traffic and Transport Services Manager

 

SUMMARY

An ‘Emergency Order’ under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 has been issued dated 19 July 2018 for the property at 310 Edgeware Road, Newtown due to the premises being severely damaged by fire. A request has now been received for the provision of 'Works Zone' outside that property to facilitate construction deliveries and permit the parking of construction vehicles for loading and unloading activities.

It is recommended that the 'Works Zone' be approved for the construction works subject to Council fees and charges.

 

Officer’s Recommendation

 

THAT:

1.   the installation of a ‘Works Zone 7AM-5.30PM Mon-Sat’ (total of 13 meters in length) on the eastern side of Edgeware Road in front of property No. 310 Edgeware Road, Newtown be APPROVED for a period of Six (6) months, for the proposed construction works; and

2.   the costs of the supply, installation and removal of the signs and ‘Works Zone’ fees in accordance with Council’s Fees and Charges are to be borne by the applicants.

 

BACKGROUND

A fire inspection report received by Council on 19 July 2018 (19982-R) revealed that emergency works to stabilise the fire damaged building along with a requirement to reinstate the roofing structure in a temporary / permanent nature were required to be undertaken as soon as practicable to make the building watertight, to prevent further water damage and to halt structural degradation to the property. 

 

An ‘Emergency Order’ under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 has been issued dated 19 July 2018 for the property at 310 Edgeware Road, Newtown due to the premises being severely damaged by fire. A request has now been received for the provision of 'Works Zone' outside that property to facilitate construction deliveries and permit the parking of construction vehicles during loading and unloading activities.

 

Written applications along with the plans illustrating the proposed locations of ‘Works Zone’ have been submitted to Council for consideration. The subject building is a two storey residential walk up flat building, of brick construction typical of the 1960s era, ground floor and level1 constructed as suspended reinforced concrete slabs, supported on the load bearing masonry walls. Effects of extensive fire damage were observed with fire damage evident on level one (1) of the building, extending from the middle of the building to the north of the building.

 

Observations from the unit located on level one of the building, adjacent to the main stair well, revealed fire damage to walls, with masonry cracking and spalling of cement render over the brick walls, and almost the entirety of the roof having been destroyed.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

The cost of the supply, installation and removal of the signs and ‘Works Zone’ fees are to be borne by the applicant in accordance with Council’s Fees and Charges.

 

 

OFFICER COMMENTS

 

Subject Location

Classification of Road

Road Description

Edgeware Road, Newtown

Regional Road carrying around 15,500 vpd

Two-way street 13.5m in width with lane side parking on either side that runs north-south between Enmore Road/Stanmore Road and Bedwin Road overpass.

 

310 Edgeware Road, Newtown

 

The subject property is located on the eastern side of Edgeware Road, Newtown. The proposed ‘Works Zone’ will be 13 metres in length and located on the eastern side of Edgeware Road adjacent to the site. It will be required for a period of approximately  six (6) months, to be utilised by construction vehicles during deliveries and loading and unloading activities (refer to the below locality map and photographs).

At present, unrestricted parking is permitted on the eastern side of Edgeware Road Newtown. The parking spaces in the subject section of Edgeware Road are highly utilised by local residents. Therefore, the provision of a ‘Works Zone’ would provide a safe facility for loading and unloading activities at the subject site during the construction period.

 

 

 

 

Locality Map – 310 Edgeware Road, Newtown (Edgeware Road Frontage)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Photographs – Edgeware Road, Newtown (infront of 310 Edgeware Road, Newtown)

 

The proposed location of the ‘Works Zone’ in Edgeware Road, Newtown

 

 

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

A notification letter will be distributed to adjoining residents prior to the ‘Works Zone’ being installed.

CONCLUSION

approved for the construction works subject to Council fees and charges.

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT:

1.   the installation of a ‘Works Zone 7AM-5.30PM Mon-Sat’ (total of 13 meters in length) on the eastern side of Edgeware Road in front of property No. 310 Edgeware Road, Newtown be APPROVED for a period of Six (6) months, for the proposed construction works; and

2.   the costs of the supply, installation and removal of the signs and ‘Works Zone’ fees in accordance with Council’s Fees and Charges are to be borne by the applicants.

 

GENERAL BUSINESS

 

Nil.

 

Meeting closed at  11.43am.


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

Item No:         C0818(3) Item 14

Subject:         Victoria Road Precinct, Marrickville, Development Control Plan Amendment           

Prepared By:     David Birds - Group Manager Strategic Planning 

Authorised By:  John Warburton - Deputy General Manager Community and Engagement

 

SUMMARY

The Victoria Road Planning Proposal was approved by the gazettal of an amendment to the Marrickville Local Environmental Plan 2011 (MLEP 2011) on 1 December 2017. Council is now considering associated amendments to Part 9.47 Victoria Road Precinct of Marrickville Development Control Plan 2011 (draft Victoria Road DCP), which was initially drafted by the proponent of the Victoria Road Planning Proposal, (Ethos Urban/Danias Holdings Pty Ltd), in order to support the amended MLEP 2011.

 

The draft Victoria Road DCP was publicly exhibited from 8 May 2018 to 5 June 2018 and 49 submissions were received.

 

A report providing a review of the feedback from the public exhibition and recommended actions was tabled at the Council meeting on 24 July 2018.

 

The report identified that during exhibition of the DCP several issues have required amendments to be recommended to the DCP in order that it can be finalised. Matters requiring amendment relate to road improvement works, transport connections, protection of heritage items, building design impacts and controls, drainage and flood risks and the like.

 

A key matter highlighted in finalising the DCP has been the need to establish a clear and robust mechanism to secure the provision of infrastructure upgrades needed to support the development of the precinct, in particular drainage, traffic and transport improvements and open space requirements, before the DCP is finalised. This is because when the DCP has been approved, development applications can then be determined for the area, and if a suitable mechanism is not in place to deliver the infrastructure upgrades and any associated land dedications Council could be liable for part of the cost associated with the provision of these unbudgeted works, which preliminary work indicates could cost of as much as $50 million. The usual mechanism to ensure the provision of the upgrades through development contributions is through an amendment to the associated Section 7.11 (formerly Section 94) Contributions Plan. Work is currently under way in this regard and it is anticipated that it will take approximately six months to finalise that plan. Having said that, if the work on the plan identifies a shortfall of funding from development contributions to pay for the infrastructure necessary to support the upzoning in the corridor because of the current $20,000 cap per dwelling that applies to development contributions, Council may need to approach IPART for an increase in that cap. That would add more time to the process.

 

Legal advice was obtained from Mr Hemmings SC to assist Council in understanding how the financial issues and risks identified above operate in a legal context. Such advice has been provided to Councillors previously under separate cover.

 

At its meeting on 24 July 2018, Council resolved that the consideration of the DCP be deferred pending a meeting with interested Councillors, Department of Planning, the Proponent and Council Officers. That meeting took place on 13 August 2018 when interested Councillors were able to ask the attendees questions. Councillors have been separately advised of the content of what occurred at the meeting.

 

This report updates Council on the current position with the draft DCP and notes that:

 

·    The draft DCP remains capable of being finalised subject to the recommendations  identified in this report;

·    If Council resolves to adopt the DCP prior to a suitable Contributions Plan amendment being in place there will be a financial risk to Council. This could be as much as $50 million and will be quantified by the ongoing work being carried out on the Contributions Plan;

·    The current development application (DA) for the Rich Street precinct appears to be the only major DA that is likely to be ready for determination before the Contributions Plan amendment has been finalised; and

·    The applicant for the Rich Street precinct has indicated it could offer a voluntary planning agreement (VPA).

 

With respect to the Rich Street DA, it is noted that the advice from Mr Hemmings addresses whether that DA (or any substantive DA within the corridor) can be approved before the DCP is made.

 

Based upon the matters discussed in the report and the legal advice received, it is recommended that Council officers continue to work to finalise the Contributions Plan amendment and the DCP and that a report be made to a future meeting of Council on progress on these matters when the infrastructure needs for the corridor and their associated cost have been more clearly worked out. This is expected to take 3-4 months.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT Council:

 

1.    Updates the draft Victoria Road Development Control Plan in accordance with the  recommendations listed in Tables 1 - 3 (Attachment 1) of this report;

 

2.    Continues to prepare a Section 7.11 Contributions Plan to support infrastructure upgrades in the precinct; and

 

3.    Requests a report be made to a future meeting of Council on progress on items 1 and 2 above at such time as the likely scope and cost of infrastructure needs for the precinct have been identified.

 

 

 

 

BACKGROUND

The Victoria Road Planning Proposal was approved by the gazettal of an amendment to the Marrickville Local Environmental 2011 Plan (MLEP 2011) on 1 December 2017 (refer to Attachment 3 for the gazettal determination letter). The Victoria Road Planning Proposal re-zoned areas of IN1 General Industrial land to R3- Medium Density, R4 – High Density, B4 – Mixed Use and B5 – Business Development zones. These zones enable a range of built forms including residential flat buildings, commercial retail/office premises and mixed residential/commercial uses, enabling a potential increase of 1,100 dwellings in the precinct.

 

 

Image 1: Map indicating the area encompassed by the Victoria Road Precinct Planning Proposal (outlined in black) that forms part of Precinct 47 (identified in red dash) as defined under Marrickville Development Control Plan 2011.

 

New Clause 6.17 was inserted into the MLEP which requires the preparation of a Development Control Plan (DCP) for the land prior to any development consent being granted addressing the following matters:

 

“(a)  the upgrading of road networks and intersections on the land and surrounding areas,

(b)  transport connections on the land and within surrounding areas (including the layout of laneways, bicycle routes and other connections),

(c)  the protection of items and areas of heritage significance,

(d)  the management and mitigation of the impact of existing industrial development in the surrounding areas on the amenity of proposed residential development on the land,

(e)  the impacts of the development on the surrounding residential and industrial areas and the amenity of the neighbourhood,

(f)  the mitigation of aircraft noise (including through building design and the use of appropriate building materials),

(g)  the management of drainage and flood risks,

(h)  a network of active and passive recreation areas,

(i)  the protection of public open spaces (including from overshadowing).

 

Clause 6.18 was also inserted which requires satisfactory arrangements to be made with the State Government regarding public infrastructure, most specifically some widening at the intersection of Victoria and Sydenham Roads.

 


 

The current zoning map of the MLEP 2011 for the precinct is below.

 

 


 

The current height of buildings map of the Marrickville LEP in the precinct is below.

 

 

 

Council is now considering associated amendments to the Marrickville Development Control Plan 2011 (MDCP 2011) to meet the requirements of Clause 6.17 of the MLEP.

 

Council at its meeting on 24 April 2018 (C0418 Item 12) considered a report on exhibiting the draft Victoria Road DCP. A copy of that report is attached as Attachment 4.

 

In dealing with the matter Council resolved:

 

“THAT:

 

1.   The shadowing diagrams for Wicks Park within this report be included in the draft Victoria Road Precinct (Precinct 47) amendment to the Marrickville Development Control Plan 2011 at Attachment 1;

2.   Council resolves to publicly exhibit the draft Victoria Road Precinct (Precinct 47) amendment to the Marrickville Development Control Plan 2011 (April 2018 version) at Attachment 1; and

3.   The post exhibition report be reported back to Council no later than the first ordinary meeting in June.

 

The draft Victoria Road DCP was publicly exhibited from 08 May 2018 to 05 June 2018. A total of 49 submissions were received in response to the exhibition. The Community Engagement Report can be found in Attachment 2. The public submissions have raised some substantive issues that warrant modifications to the draft Victoria Road DCP and these are identified and described in this report.

 

During the public exhibition period, Council consulted with key external agencies such as Sydney Airports Corporation Limited (SACL) and the Department of Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) and with key internal referral bodies such as the Architectural Excellence Panel (AEP), and Engineering and Heritage sections of Council to provide further input into the content and structure of the Victoria Road DCP.

 

Council at its meeting on 24 July 2018 (C0718 Item 7) considered a report on considering submissions received during the exhibition period, and whether to adopt the amendment to the Marrickville DCP.

 

In dealing with that matter Council resolved:

 

THAT the matter be deferred pending a meeting with interested Councillors, Department of Planning, the Proponent and Council Officers. With the matter to be reported back to council within 1 month.

 

The meeting required was held on 13 August 2018 and Councillors were able to ask the attendees questions. Councillors have been advised of the proceedings at the meeting.

 

KEY PLANNING ISSUES

 

As detailed in the background section of this report, the Victoria Road DCP seeks to address key considerations under Clause 6.17 of MLEP 2011 in order that it can be adopted by Council. An assessment of the outstanding issues of the Victoria Road DCP arising from the public exhibition and further analysis in relation to these key considerations is provided below.

 

“(a)  the upgrading of road networks and intersections on the land and surrounding areas”

 

Intersection of Sydenham Road and Victoria Road

 

Clause 6.18 of MLEP 2011 requires the dedication of land and finances to support upgrades of state and regional roads. Sydenham Road is a classified (State) road that traverses through the precinct, and any required upgrades to this road are managed by the state agency, RMS.

 

During the assessment of the Victoria Road Planning Proposal, one of the key issues identified by Council’s traffic consultant was the need to upgrade the intersection of Victoria Road and Sydenham Road to mitigate the additional traffic generation resulting from the redevelopment associated with the planning proposal. The proponent was advised that a likely future upgrade of the Victoria Road/Sydenham Road intersection with additional turning lanes is required in accordance with the diagram below:

 


Figure 1: Required Upgrade on the intersection of Sydenham Road and Victoria Road

 

RMS has verbally advised Council that there is no objection to the DCP, subject to the recommended modifications raised in their referral being addressed (Attachment 8). The referral was received at the time of finalising this report and Council Officers will require time to review the RMS and TfNSW recommendations in conjunction with the recommendations made by Council’s engineers (Attachment 1) and undertake the appropriate amendments to the DCP as deemed appropriate before it is formally adopted.

 

Other Road Upgrades

 

Council’s Development Engineers have considered that land on certain streets within the precinct; particularly Brompton Street, Chalder Street and Chalder Lane, should be widened to improve traffic movements and ensure pedestrian safety and efficiency, particularly on the roads (Chalder Street and Chalder Lane) adjacent to Marrickville Public School. The road/footpath widening may impact on items recommended for heritage listing, as discussed in section 1(c) of this report.

 

Officer Recommendations:

 

The recommendations made by RMS and TfNSW (Attachment 8) should be reviewed in conjunction with the Engineering recommendations in Attachment 1, and modifications to the DCP be undertaken as deemed appropriate, before the formal adoption of the DCP.

 

Other Road Upgrades

 

It is recommended that a further analysis is undertaken with Council Heritage Advisors and Engineers to resolve footpath/road widening on items for potential heritage listing and exploration of alternative solutions before formal adoption of the DCP.

 

“(b) transport connections on the land and within surrounding areas (including the layout of laneways, bicycle routes and other connections)”

 

 

 

Laneways

 

Laneways shown on the associated DCP are supported, however the DCP should limit the number of intersections along Victoria Road by consolidating access points and diverting vehicular access in new shared zones from Victoria Road to other laneways/existing streets to ameliorate impacts to traffic/pedestrian safety.

 

Additional pedestrian links and shared zones are recommended to improve pedestrian legibility, connectivity and safety throughout the precinct in accordance with Table 1(11), Attachment 1.

 

Bicycle Routes

 

The DCP identifies local on-road cycling routes through the precinct and indicates the intention to incorporate safe and legible cycle routes. The DCP lacks detail on the appropriate cycling infrastructure treatments and enhancements on the identified bicycle routes and does not detail the wider bicycle network in the areas just outside the precinct borders (such as Addison Road) to demonstrate the wider context of the cycling network in the Local Government Area (LGA).

 

Public Transport Connections

 

Transport for New South Wales (TfNSW) has raised concerns in their previous comments on the Victoria Road Planning Proposal about the impacts of additional traffic and access points on Victoria Road on the operational safety/efficiency bus routes and bus stops. Comments from TfNSW have now been received (Attachment 8). Recommendations are made in the TfNSW referral (Attachment 8) which should be reviewed in conjunction with Engineering Comments in Attachment 1 and any appropriate modifications be undertaken before formal adoption of the DCP.

 

Pedestrian Connections through Wicks Park

 

There is no pedestrian through-site link identified adjacent to the northern boundary of Wicks Park in the identified Wicks Park Sub-Precinct to link new development with the park.

 

Officer Recommendations:

 

Laneways

 

Adopt the recommended action in Table 1(11), Attachment 1 requiring additional shared zones and alternate vehicle movements in new shared zones and laneways away from Victoria Road.

 

Bicycle Routes

 

The DCP should identify cycling infrastructure treatments and enhancements on the identified bicycle routes in accordance with Table 1(12), Attachment 1.

 

Public Transport Connections

 

Review recommendations made by RMS/TfNSW in their referral (Attachment 8) in conjunction with Council’s Engineering comments (Attachment 1), and any appropriate modifications be undertaken to the DCP, before its formal adoption by Council.

 

 

Pedestrian Connections through Wicks Park

 

The DCP should provide for the construction of a 3m wide public footpath set back zone along the built edges of Wicks Park to ensure proper integration with the park.

 

“(c) the protection of items and areas of heritage significance”

 

There are no heritage conservation areas in the Victoria Road Precinct. However, there are two items of local heritage significance under MLEP 2011:

 

·    14 Rich Street – Industrial Façade (Item No. I117 ); and

·    65 Shepherds Street – Sims Metal Factory including interiors (Item No. I118).

 

Council’s Heritage Advisor has undertaken a precinct-wide study to determine any additional items to be considered for heritage listing. The study can be viewed in Attachment 5. In summary, the following additional items are recommended for heritage listing:

 

·    Edward Bentley & Sons Twine Mill complex (former) in Hans Place /Chalder Avenue. The whole complex not the facades should be listed including the brick facades and entrances to Faverhsam Street, Hans Place and Chalder Avenue, the sawtooth roofed sections.

·    Blyton Terrace, 171-177 Victoria Road.

·    Semi-Detached housing at 47-49 Chalder Street.

·    Metropolitan Knitting Mills (former, now Kennards) 64 Chapel Street including the lane to the rear.

·    Suess Bakery (former) 169 Victoria Road.

·    Stormwater Channel, part of the Marrickville Swamp Drainage Scheme (as a S170 listing).

·    The Factory Theatre, 105 Victoria Road, including the lane from Brompton Street.

·    Tin Sheds, Brompton Street (formerly the Triangle Foundry & P P King Machinery Merchant) (11-13 Brompton Street).

·    Welby Terrace, 2-22 Smith Street including interiors.

·    Wicks Park (former Brick Pitt) including the substation, site of the wartime zig zag air raid trenches and landscaping.

 

Under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 (EP&A Act), the statutory protection of items of heritage significance is undertaken when formally listed in an LEP, not a DCP. The process of heritage listing of the above sites under MLEP 2011 is a separate process to the review and adoption of this DCP and will be undertaken at a future stage.

 

A number of items for potential heritage listing are located in areas that are zoned ‘SP2- Local Road’ for road widening on Victoria Road or are located in areas to be identified for foot path/road widening by Council’s Engineers and the DCP. The feasibility of such heritage listings on sites to be impacted by road widening/extensions, is required to be examined and alternative solutions explored with the heritage advisor and engineers before the DCP is formally adopted.

 

After undertaking the above review and finalising the list of potential items of heritage, the DCP should acknowledge the contributory value of these historical items and require further heritage studies when undertaking re-development as part of a Development Application with a view to encourage their retention/adaptive re-use as part of the redevelopment of those sites.

 

 

Officer Recommendation:

 

It is recommended that Council resolves the conflict between engineering requirements for road/footpath widening and potential items of heritage listing before the DCP is formally adopted. The final list of potential heritage items will be updated in the DCP on this basis (if required) upon the final recommendation for the Victoria Road DCP.

 

A control should be added to the heritage section of the DCP requiring a full heritage and fabric assessment of any re-development on items to be considered for heritage listing in accordance with the final listing, including any recommendations to mitigate impacts to potential heritage items. This process can acknowledge the contributory value of these historical items and require further heritage studies when undertaking re-development as part of a Development Application with a view to encourage their retention/adaptive re-use as part of the redevelopment of those sites. If necessary, consideration can also be given to actually exhibiting an amendment to the LEP concerning heritage items at the same time as the DCP is reported to Council.

 

“(d)   the management and mitigation of the impact of existing industrial development in the surrounding areas on the amenity of proposed residential development on the land”

 

The mitigation of the impacts of existing industrial development on new residential development is addressed in the following two manners:

 

·    The new residential and mixed-use zones in the precinct are buffered by less ‘intrusive’ zones in relation to industrial activity [B5 – Business Development, R2- Low Density Residential and SP2 – Educational Establishment zones under MLEP 2011 (see map below)] The residential zones are therefore less likely to be impacted by  general industrial zones; and

 

Part 6.2 Industrial/Residential Interface of MDCP 2011 contains provisions to protect residential amenity adjacent to industrial land.

 

 


Figure 2: New residential/mixed-use R4. R3 and B4 zones are buffered by R2, B5 and SP2 zones, mitigating impacts from nearby heavier industrial (IN1 zones).

 

Officer Recommendation:

 

It is considered that Clause 6.17(d) of MLEP 2011 in relation to the management and mitigation of industrial development with the amenity of residential zones is satisfactorily addressed and no further modification to the draft Victoria Road DCP is recommended.

 

“(e)      The impacts of the development on the surrounding residential and industrial areas and the amenity of the neighbourhood”


The DCP proposes tall residential/mixed-use building block structures (7 – 14 storeys) within close proximity to each other in the Timber Yards Sub-Precinct and Wicks Park Sub-Precinct. It is unclear whether the proposed tall block structures can conform to Apartment Design Guide (ADG) requirements under State Environmental Planning Policy No. 65 – Design Quality of Residential Apartment in relation to building separation (18 – 24 metres for 5+ storeys) for solar access, outlook and privacy.  It is also uncertain whether proposed building blocks can be of a building depth (12 metres to 18 metres) in accordance with the ADG to provide adequate natural ventilation and solar amenity in accordance with the ADG.

 

The application was referred to the Architectural Excellence Panel (AEP) who also raised the above issues. A full analysis of these issues can be viewed in Table 1(3 - 5), Attachment 1. While the applicant has provided indicative building block structures for the Timber Yards Precinct (see Attachment 7), the DCP should provide more certainty for design clarity around building blocks to ensure adequate ventilation and solar amenity within new development in the precinct.

 

Officer Recommendation:


It is recommended that the residential and mixed-use building blocks and separation distances between adjoining buildings should be dimensioned in the DCP in the R3, R4 and B4 zones in the precinct under MLEP 2011 to ensure building blocks conform to ADG requirements for building depth and separation in accordance with Table 1(3-5), Attachment 1.

 

The AEP also recommends increasing building separation between 2 x taller 14 storey building elements in the Timber Yards Sub-Precinct and provide a public park between these buildings to improve the open space provisions in the precinct (to be discussed in further detail later in this report). This solution is not supported for the reasons stated in Part 2(h) of this report. 

 

“(f)    the mitigation of aircraft noise (including through building design and the use of appropriate building materials)”

 

The Victoria Road DCP contains a comprehensive list of objectives, controls and design guidelines under Parts 9.47.11, 9.47.12 and Schedule 1 to mitigate aircraft noise. The DCP was referred to Sydney Airports Corporation Limited (SACL) which was satisfied with the noise attenuation measures provided in the DCP, subject to further information to be included in community notice boards about aircraft movements in the precinct [see Table 3(1), Schedule 1].

 

Officer Recommendation:

 

It is considered that Clause 6.17(f) of MLEP 2011 in relation to the mitigation of development from aircraft noise is satisfactorily addressed and no further modification to the draft Victoria Road DCP is recommended to address the above matter.

 

“(g)  the management of drainage and flood risks”

 

The Victoria Road DCP was referred to Council’s Engineering section who stated that the DCP lacks clarity in detailing the required storm water infrastructure upgrades in the precinct. It is a concern that the proposal will increase flood risk in the LGA by intensification of development without provision of suitable flood mitigation measures to reduce flooding.

 

N.B: For a comprehensive analysis of the flooding issues, view Table 1(9), Attachment 1.

 

Officer Recommendation:

 

In order to adequately manage stormwater drainage and flood risk as required by Clause 6.17 3(g) of MLEP 2011 the following controls should be implemented included in the DCP:

 

·    All Council or Sydney Water stormwater drainage systems shall be upgraded to a 1 in 20 year capacity.

·    1 in 100 year overland flow paths shall be provided over all Council or Sydney Water stormwater drainage systems.

·    All existing blocked overland flow paths shall be opened.

 

A Section 7.11 Contributions Plan is being developed to further investigate required works and costing to develop an area–wide scheme to reduce potential flooding to acceptable levels for medium to high density residential development through a wider upgraded trunk drainage system for the locality. The plan shall provide more detailing regarding stormwater infrastructure. The risk associated with adopting the Victoria Road DCP prior to the establishment of a Section 7.11 Contributions Plan, is that Council may be unable to legally acquire private land (or require associated easements) or a suitable financial contribution to works required to provide associated stormwater infrastructure under a development application without giving rise to financial compensation which would potentially result in significant adverse resourcing and financial burdens to Council.

 

A full list of comments and recommendations in relation to storm water/flooding can be viewed in Table 1(9), Attachment 1.

 

“(h) a network of active and passive recreation areas”

 

The Victoria Road DCP proposes two publically accessible open spaces adjoining Farr Street in the Timber Yards Sub-Precinct and a ‘privately owned publically accessible’ park on Rich Street (referred to as ‘pocket parks’ in the DCP document. The application was referred to the AEP who made the following comments:

 

·    Opportunity exists to increase building separation between two taller buildings (14 storeys) in the Timber Yards Sub-Precinct and provide a public open space between them to improve apartment amenity and public open space in the precinct [refer to Table 1(2), Schedule 1]; and

·    Proposed Rich Street park would benefit from direct access and physical connection to the public street network, for example the park should have public street access along at least two sides of the park to ensure the park is perceived by people as a public place and not a ‘privatised’ or semi-public place.

 

The AEP recommendations will not be adopted for the reasons listed in Table 1(3)(6), Attachment 1. The reasons include the fact that a park in the Timber Yards precinct, to be bounded by a 14 storey building to the north (as per the AEP recommendation), is likely to be overshadowed for the majority of the daytime period.

 

The Rich Street Park is designed to be communal open space for the Rich Street Precinct, not as public open space, and re-locating it will result in design feasibility issues for future development. Council’s Trees and Parks section has stated their preference for the ‘pocket parks’ to be privately maintained and publically accessible. The ownership of land for the pocket parks will be resolved outside this DCP process.

 

Officer Recommendation:

 

It is recommended that all publically accessible open spaces should be dimensioned for clarity.

 

A comprehensive list of the comments and recommended solutions for the publically accessible open spaces can be viewed in Table 1(3)(6), Attachment 1.

 

“(i)  the protection of public open spaces (including from overshadowing)

 

The previous Council report (24 April 2018 – See Attachment 4) commented that the extent of shadowing of Wicks Park has been significantly reduced under the latest version of the MDCP amendment. Afternoon shadowing in winter has been almost eliminated, midday winter shadowing has been reduced, and morning winter shadowing is similar to initially proposed. This latest level of shadowing is considered much more acceptable than initially proposed.

 

Officer Recommendation:

 

To provide more certainty and clarity at the Development Application (DA) stage, it is recommended that the building blocks in the Wicks Park Sub-Precinct be dimensioned (including the building separation distances between them) to ensure that the buildings protect solar access to Wicks Park [see full solution in Table 1(4), Attachment 1 for further detail].

 

 

 

OTHER PLANNING MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION

 

a)   Discrepancies between height and FSR

 

The gazettal of the Victoria Road Planning Proposal under MLEP 2011 established height and Floor Space Ratio (FSR) maps for the precinct. It is noted that the relationship of height and FSR on sites has not been thoroughly tested as part of this process as a number of sites are unlikely to achieve maximum heights under MLEP 2011 due to a lower FSR on the site. For example, a number of sites in the B5 Business Development zones have an FSR of 2:1 and a 23 metre (roughly 5 - 6 storeys) height limit, while other sites have a maximum height limit of 20 metres (roughly 5 storeys) with an FSR of 1:1. It is unlikely that development can achieve the maximum height limits with the maximum FSRs on some sites.

 

The draft Victoria Road DCP provides a Height of Building map (based on the Height of Building Map under MLEP 2011) with suggested building blocks. A number of building heights in the precinct will encourage a large exceedance in FSR development standards (some sites are roughly tested as 200%). It is imperative that a DCP document does not create scenarios that are contrary to the development standards under MLEP 2011. The DCP document should act as a ‘guide’ that communicates realistic building envelopes scenarios based on height and FSR. The DCP should not encourage exceedance in development standards.

 

Officer Recommendation:

 

It is recommended that the building blocks/height of buildings map in the draft Victoria Road DCP and Sections be revised to ensure suggested building heights are not exceeding the FSR development standards and provide a range rather than a fixed building height, e.g. ‘2 – 4 storeys’ rather than ‘6 storeys’.

 

A control shall be included in Part 9.47.6.4 Building Heights of the DCP which states the following:

 

Where a proposed development maximises the LEP floor space ratio for the site but does not achieve the maximum indicative building height set out in Figure 16, the LEP floor space ratio control shall prevail.”

 

b)   Site Amalgamation

 

Achieving height and FSR development standards

 

There are a number of narrow, smaller sites in the precinct where only maximum height and FSR development standards can be achieved through larger site amalgamations.

 

A DCP can address the above discrepancies by requiring site amalgamation. Site amalgamation requires smaller building blocks to be amalgamated for re-development, which can make it more achievable for height and FSRs to be reached with development by ‘distributing’ floor space across a larger site. It can provide building block and height scenarios that intend to achieve certain heights and FSRs and create an environment where it is viable for land owners to dedicate land for public infrastructure under a corresponding Section 7.11 Plan of the precinct. Adopting the DCP in its current form without a site amalgamation provision is likely to result in landowners, particularly with small parcels of land, being unfairly impacted by required land dedication for roads and footpaths without receiving any financial incentive to undertake such works. It is therefore important that a site amalgamation provision be undertaken to ensure land owners can fairly and equitably dedicate land for public infrastructure.

 

Amenity

 

The precinct contains a mixture of narrow, wide and deep lots. It makes it difficult to ensure sites can achieve good amenity (through building depth) and infrastructure (such as basement parking) without indicative site amalgamations.

 

Split zonings

 

The zoning map under MLEP 2011 identifies different zonings that do not follow the cadastral pattern of the site boundaries in the precinct. Split zonings on certain sites may be problematic in relation to design feasibility/efficiency for buildings. See picture below as an example of split zonings between sites in the precinct (as circled in black). A site amalgamation provision can address this issue by directing development to be provided on land with the same zoning.

 

 

 

 

Isolated Sites

There is also a risk that smaller sites will be isolated during re-development given there is no site amalgamation provision to ameliorate this risk within the Marrickville LEP.

                 

Officer Recommendation:

 

The following actions be undertaken:

 

·    Create a site amalgamation map of the DCP specifying an indicative minimum lot size and frontage, providing a range that reflects different block structures in the sub-precincts. The site amalgamation map and Section 7.11 Contributions Plan should be created in conjunction with each other to ensure dedication of private land  for public infrastructure can be legally and equitably achieved in the precinct without private land owners being unfairly burdened (financially) by land dedications during re-development;

·    The site amalgamation section should include a control that allotments must not result in any adjoining sites being isolated to the extent that it is not possible for development to occur in accordance with the urban design vision for the Master Plan Area.

 

A full list of the comments and recommendations in relation to site amalgamation is provided in Table 1(1), Attachment 1.

 

c)   Sydney Water Canal north of Rich Street

 

The canal corridor north of Rich Street should be activated as a pedestrian thoroughfare and incorporate Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) Principles and public domain improvements.

 

Officer Recommendation:

 

Incorporate a separate DCP section providing WSUD objectives and controls for the canal corridor north of Rich Street as part of the movement network in the DCP to encourage its activation, subject to meeting any requirements by Sydney Water [refer to Table 1(7), Schedule 1].

 

d)   Visual Privacy for Marrickville Public School

 

Concern was raised in public submissions about overlooking impacts to Victoria Road Public School from new development. While Part 2.7 of MDCP 2011 contains privacy objectives and controls for residential development, it does not address visual privacy of schools.

 

The setback map in the DCP (Figure 17, Page 29) recommends a 6 metre setback to the school from residential development on the Timber Yards Precinct. This setback should be increased to 9 metres to provide further visual privacy between the school and future residential development.

 

Officer Recommendation:

 

Add an objective and control in Part 9.47.9.2 Building form and Design of the DCP which requires developments to minimise overlooking onto Marrickville Public School [in accordance with Table 1(14), Schedule 1]. The setback map should be amended to increase the minimum required setback of 9 metres to the school from residential development in the Timber Yards Precinct (south of the school).

 

e)   Waste

 

Council’s Waste Resource Recovery Team has recommended the provision of a separate waste section in the DCP targeting the precinct to maximise resource separation and recovery in accordance with current best practice standards.

Officer Recommendation:

 

It is recommended that a separate section be added to the DCP and re-formatted in accordance with the DCP structure to incorporate the waste management objectives and controls in the precinct (See Attachment 6).

 

f)    Minor/Administrative Matters and Errors

 

The Victoria Road DCP contains objectives and controls that can be further clarified, refined and modified to ensure consistency with Inner West Council’s overall planning objectives controls, processes and development standards. The DCP also contains written and mapping errors and inconsistencies that require corrections. A full list of the minor/administrative matters can be viewed in Table 2, Attachment 1.

 

Officer Recommendation:

 

The minor/administrative matters and errors are resolved in accordance with the recommended actins listed in Table 2, Attachment 1.

 

PUBLIC CONSULATION

 

The Victoria Road DCP was exhibited from 8 May 2018 to 5 June 2018. As part of that community engagement process, letters were sent to the individual property owners and occupiers of the affected land within the Victoria Road Precinct. Over 3,500 letters were sent out advising of the public exhibition of the proposed amendment. The draft Victoria Road DCP was exhibited on Council’s Your Say Inner West Website, the portal to review the exhibition material and the Local Newspaper.

 

A total of 49 submissions were received in response to the community engagement. The outcome of the exhibition was:

 

·    Supportive without amendment (16%)

·    Supportive with amendments (37%)

·    Not Supportive (45%)

·    Out of scope of the DCP (2%)

 

A copy of the community engagement report can be found in Attachment 2, including an analysis of the public submissions and Council’s response to these submissions. In essence, a number of public submissions raised concerns that warrant revisions to the DCP to address those concerns, while other parts of the DCP are considered satisfactory in relation to other objections and recommendations made by the public. A number of these issues have generally been reviewed earlier in this report.

 

Submissions were also received from agencies including RMS and TfNSW as referred to earlier in this report. A submission was also received from Sydney Airports Corporation Limited (SACL) stating that SACL is generally supportive of the DCP in relation to protection of airspace over the precinct and noise attenuation guidelines. SACL provided further information to be included in information packs for residential development in the precinct in accordance with Table 3(1) of Attachment 1.

 

SECTION 7.11 CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN

(Formerly Section 94 Contributions Plan)

 

Clause 6.17 of MLEP 2011 requires the DCP to address, for the entire precinct, infrastructure in the form of road network upgrades, transport connections, drainage and recreation areas required to support the increased expected worker and resident population in the precinct. For critical infrastructure to be provided for the precinct, funding and land dedication (captured from re-development of land) mechanisms must be established.

 

The planning system in NSW does not permit Council to require land to be dedicated to Council unless there is a Section 7.11 Contributions Plan, pursuant to the Environmental EP&A Act, in place that identifies required funding and land dedications. While the draft Victoria Road DCP document identifies areas to be provided for potential publically accessible parks and footpath/road upgrades, the DCP cannot require land dedication as it is only considered a ‘guideline’ under Clause 3.43 of the EP&A Act.

 

The current Marrickville Section 94/94A Contributions Plan does not envisage this area being rezoned and developed for land uses other than industrial purposes. Whilst it allows for some contributions to be collected for development in the precinct these cannot be applied to the new works required as a result of the recent upzoning of the precinct and must be applied to the works already identified in that Plan.

 

Therefore if the draft Victoria Road DCP is approved prior to an amended Section 7.11 Contributions Plan being in place there will be no mechanism for Council to secure further funding and land dedications. Council would then have to provide this infrastructure at its own cost, as development applications could be approved without the necessary associated infrastructure delivery mechanism. Importantly, there would also be a strong risk that the land dedications required could not be achieved. These matters have not been budgeted for or otherwise allowed for and thus Council could be at risk of being required to provide infrastructure currently uncosted but broadly estimated at as much as $50 million if a plan with suitable mechanisms is not in place. This is taking into account that any land acquisitions required would be estimated at highest and best value based on the current, recently upzoned, land uses permissible.

 

Work is currently being carried out on a suitable Section 7.11 Contributions Plan addressing all the relevant works, and as part of this work various studies are required to be undertaken by Council. This work involves identifying in detail the critical infrastructure required for the precinct and the associated financial requirements and land dedications required for its delivery. Consequently there are risks associated with adopting the draft DCP until the associated Section 7.11 Contributions Plan has been finalised for consideration for approval. Until that work has been completed it is not possible to accurately quantify the potential extent of the costs of the necessary infrastructure delivery.

 

It is important that infrastructure works and required land dedications are clearly defined and established rather than this be done on an ad hoc basis so that each site is developed to efficiently and equitably manage infrastructure delivery in accordance with staging plans which identify the timing, cost and trigger points for the delivery of infrastructure upgrades across the precinct.

 

Council would be aware that there is a current development application for the Rich Street area of the precinct under consideration and a range of detailed matters are in the process of being addressed. Given Clause 6.17 of the LEP, it is considered that the DA cannot be approved until the DCP is made. External legal advice regarding this matter has been provided to Councillors previously under separate cover.

 

On the basis of the above Council considered a report at its meeting on 24 July 2018 and resolved that the consideration of the DCP be deferred pending a meeting with interested Councillors, Department of Planning, the Proponent and Council Officers. That meeting took place on 13 August 2018 when interested Councillors were able to ask the attendees questions. Discussions at the meeting and further investigations have established that:

 

·    The current development application (DA) for commercial development at the Rich Street precinct appears to be the only major DA that is likely to be ready for determination before the Contributions Plan amendment has been finalised;

·    The Rich Street DA is commercial in nature and, in the event the DCP was adopted, would still provide a contribution under the current Marrickville Development Contributions Plan at commercial rates;

·    Significant development applications for residential development are not yet lodged and would be unlikely to be finalised ready for consideration for approval prior to the Contributions Plan amendment being finalised. Even if they were, contributions would be capped at $20,000 per apartment which is similar to the requirements of the current Contributions Plan;

·    If the Contributions Plan amendment indicates that a variation to the $20,000 cap needs to be sought from IPART it could take a further 6-12 months on top of the 6 months timeframe to prepare a Contributions Plan amendment to obtain a decision on this from IPART. There is no guarantee that IPART will support an increase in the funding cap which could leave Council with the burden of meeting any funding gap if required infrastructure is needed to be delivered.

 

The financial risk of adopting the DCP before the Contributions Plan amendment is in place would be partially mitigated due to the contributions still being capable of being required under the current plan, the timeframe for the finalisation of the new plan, and the longer timeline for further DAs being determined. It is noted that the applicant for the Rich Street precinct has indicated it could offer a voluntary planning agreement (VPA). Whilst no VPA offer has yet been made this could help mitigate the risk of potentially foregone increased contributions requirements for the proposal under the Contributions Plan amendment, however at this stage there is not sufficient information available to quantify what the potential contributions requirement will be under the amended plan. This information will emerge during the preparation of the Contributions Plan amendment.

 

It is therefore recommended that Council officers continue to work to finalise the Contributions Plan amendment and the DCP, and that a report be made to a future meeting of Council on progress on these issues when the potential contributions requirements under the Contributions Plan amendment have been identified.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

As noted in this report, there is a financial risk to Council if it approves the draft DCP before an associated Section 7.11 Contributions Plan is approved that includes suitable mechanisms to legally require necessary financial contributions and land dedications for public infrastructure upgrades such as road widening, stormwater infrastructure and publically accessible open spaces. While it is not possible without a detailed infrastructure analysis to provide a detailed estimate of the potential monetary loss, the monetary loss could potentially be as much as $50 million.

 

CONCLUSION

The exhibition of the DCP raised several issues that have required amendments to be recommended to the DCP in order that it can be finalised. These issues are detailed in the report and include matters relating to road improvement works, transport connections, protection of heritage items, building design impacts and controls, drainage and flood risks.

 

A key matter highlighted in finalising the DCP has been the need to establish a clear and robust mechanism to secure the provision of infrastructure upgrades needed to support the development of the precinct, in particular drainage, traffic and transport improvements and open space requirements, before the DCP is finalised. This is because when the DCP has been approved development applications can then be approved for the area. The usual mechanism to ensure the provision of the upgrades through development contributions is the associated amendment to the Section 7.11 Contributions Plan on which work is under way. It is anticipated it will take approximately six months to finalise the plan.

 

As the draft DCP is now ready to be finalised consideration needs to be given to the risk to Council of adopting the plan and enabling the Rich Street DA to be determined. Without a Contributions Plan amendment in place the development may not raise as much funds through s7.11 contributions from that site as it might have otherwise. Further work is needed to quantify the extent of this risk through the process of preparing the Contributions Plan amendment, subject to which the Council could consider approving the DCP which would allow the Rich Street DA to be considered and determined.

 

It is therefore recommended that Council officers continue to work to finalise the Contributions Plan amendment and the DCP and that a report be made to a future meeting of Council on progress on these issues when the potential contributions requirements under the Contributions Plan amendment have been identified.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

Victoria Road DCP Recommended Amendments

2.

Victoria Road DCP Submissions Analysis

3.

Determination Notice of LEP Amendment

4.

Council Report Recommending Public Exhibition of draft Victoria Road DCP - 24 April 2018

5.

Heritage Study - Victoria Road Precinct

6.

Waste Resource Recovery Objectives and Controls

7.

Timberyards Building Seperation

8.

Referral from RMS and TfNSW

  


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

Item No:         C0818(3) Item 15

Subject:         Interim heritage order and heritage assessment of dwellings at 73 and 73A The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill           

Prepared By:     Peter Failes - Urban Design Planner  

Authorised By:  David Birds - Group Manager Strategic Planning

 

SUMMARY

In response to the imminent threat associated with a development application (DA) to demolish a house at 73 The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill (Lot 1 DP 301656) and construct a four (4) storey residential flat building, the potential heritage significance of the property was brought to Council’s attention by the adjoining property owner at 73A The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill.  Council undertook a preliminary heritage assessment and this concluded it was likely, on further inquiry or investigation, to be found to be of local heritage significance and recommended that an Interim Heritage Order (IHO) be placed on the property to ensure protection of the house while further research was carried out on the heritage significance of the property. Accordingly, a memorandum was sent to the General Manager recommending this and an IHO was placed on the property, which was gazetted on 23 March 2018. 

 

Council engaged a heritage consultant (Robertson & Hindmarsh) to provide an expert heritage assessment. The heritage assessment has established that the house at 73, as well as the adjoining house at 73A (Lot X DP 411590) The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill, meets the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage’s criteria for local heritage significance and recommends both properties being heritage listed.

 

The IHO will lapse six months from the date that it is made unless Council has passed a resolution to place the item on the heritage schedule of the Marrickville Local Environmental Plan 2011. As the IHO was made 23 March 2018, the resolution of Council is required by 23 September 2018.

 

It is recommended that Council resolve to include 73 The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill (Lot 1 DP 301656) in Schedule 5 of the Marrickville Local Environmental Plan 2011 as a local item of environmental heritage. The listing is to include the interiors of the intact rooms, including the inglenook. It is also recommended that Council resolve to include 73A The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill (Lot X DP 411590) in Schedule 5 of the Marrickville Local Environmental Plan 2011 as a local item of environmental heritage. The listing is to include the front garden, path & fence, the exterior of the front section of the house (in front of the first floor addition); and the interior of the front section of the house (including the interiors of the intact rooms, including the ceilings and fireplaces).

 

The planning proposal has been referred to Council’s Inner West Local Planning Panel for advice in accordance with the Local Planning Panel Direction – Planning Proposals which, at the time of the preparation of this report, was due to meet on 28 August 2018 before the Council meeting to which this report is made. The advice from the Inner West Local Planning Panel on this matter will be provided to Council in the form of a memorandum prior to the commencement of the Council Meeting.

 

It is recommended that, subject to its consideration of the advice of the Inner West Local Planning Panel, Council submits the planning proposal and the advice to the Minister for Planning for a Gateway determination, in accordance with Section 3.34 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979. The heritage assessment also recommended investigating potential amendments or additional Heritage Conservation Areas (HCA) in the area. This will be considered as part of the new local environment plan and development control plan project for the Inner West Council and does not form part of the recommendations to Council in this report.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT Council:

 

Consider the advice from the Inner West Local Panning Panel in relation to 73 and 73A The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill. Subject to Council’s consideration of this advice:

a)      resolve to include 73 The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill (Lot 1 DP 301656)  in Schedule 5 of the Marrickville Local Environmental Plan 2011 as a local item of environmental heritage. The listing is to include the interiors of the intact rooms, including the inglenook;

b)      resolve to include 73A The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill (Lot X DP 411590) in Schedule 5 of the Marrickville Local Environmental Plan 2011 as a local item of environmental heritage. The listing is to include the front garden, path & fence, the exterior of the front section of the house (in front of the first floor addition); and the interior of the front section of the house (including the interiors of the intact rooms, including the ceilings and fireplaces);

c)      submit the planning proposal and the advice of the Inner West Local Planning Panel to the Minister for Planning for a Gateway determination to include Nos. 73 and 73A The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill as items of environmental heritage in Schedule 5 of the Marrickville Local Environmental Plan 2011, in accordance with Section 3.34 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979;

d)      requests that delegated plan making functions be granted in relation to the planning proposal; and

e)      publicly exhibit the planning proposal following a Gateway determination being issued.

 

 

 

BACKGROUND

A development application (DA201800049) was lodged with Council, to demolish the house and existing improvements at 73 The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill and to construct a 4 storey residential flat building with basement parking, on 5 February 2018. The adjoining neighbour at 73A The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill objected to the proposal and included in their submission a heritage assessment prepared by Sue Rosen Associates, which they had commissioned. This heritage assessment considered 73 and 73A The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill to have a high degree of local historical significance and recommended that the individual heritage status of 73 and 73A The Boulevarde be reassessed with a view to their entry onto Schedule 5 of the Inner West Council’s relevant local environment plan, as local heritage items. Also given the consistency of the identified qualities of The Boulevarde between 73A/104 and Eltham Street with the Lewisham Conservation Area, this heritage assessment recommended that consideration be given to the inclusion of the area in the heritage conservation area (HCA). The owner of 73A The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill informed Council that they supported their property being heritage listed and included in a HCA.

 

In response to the imminent threat associated with the DA and the potential heritage significance, Council undertook a preliminary heritage assessment. The preliminary heritage assessment concluded it was likely, on further inquiry or investigation, to be found to be of local heritage significance. It also concluded that without imposing an IHO, Council cannot protect 73 The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill from demolition, which could be demolished under a Complying Development Certificate. Accordingly, it recommended imposing an IHO to ensure the house was protected, while further research was carried out on the heritage significance of the property. A memorandum was sent to the General Manager recommending this and an IHO was placed on the property and was gazetted 23 March 2018. A copy of the gazetted IHO is included as ATTACHMENT 1 to this report.

 

The IHO will lapse six months from the date that it is made, unless Council has passed a resolution to place the item on the heritage schedule of the Marrickville Local Environmental Plan 2011. As the IHO was made 23 March 2018, the resolution of Council is required by 23 September 2018.

 

The affected owner (the proponent of the development application on the site) made an appeal to the Court against the making of an IHO by Council. The Commissioner’s judgment determined that the dwelling is likely, on further inquiry or investigation, to be found to be of local heritage significance and therefore that the IHO should remain. Accordingly, the Court ordered that the appeal be dismissed.

 

The planning proposal has been referred to Council’s Inner West Local Planning Panel for advice in accordance with the Local Planning Panel Direction – Planning Proposals, which at the time of the preparation of this report was due to meet on 28 August 2018 before the Council meeting for which this report has been prepared. The advice from the Inner West Local Planning Panel on this matter will be provided to Council in the form of a memorandum prior to the commencement of the Council Meeting.

 

DISCUSSION

 

Site Identification

 

The site that the planning proposal relates to is 73 The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill (Lot 1 DP 301656), having a site area of 662 m2, and 73A The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill (Lot X DP 411590), having a site area of 621 m2.

 

      

Fig. 1 & 2 – Cadastre and aerial location maps for 73 & 73A The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill

 

Fig. 3 – Photograph of 73 The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill

 

Fig. 4 – Photograph of 73A The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill

Current Planning Controls

 

Both properties are currently zoned R1 General Residential (see Zoning map below) and have a maximum building height of 14m under Marrickville Local Environmental Plan (MLEP) 2011. Under MLEP 2011, in terms of floor space ratio (FSR), while the FSR map allows a maximum 0.6:1, under Clause 4.4 (2A) a variable FSR applies for dwelling houses, being 0.5:1 as each of the properties has greater than 400 m2 area. Under Clause 4.4 (2B) a maximum 0.85:1 is allowed for residential flat buildings. Under MLEP 2011 there are no heritage items or heritage conservation area (HCA) close to the properties, however the Lewisham Estate HCA (labelled C26) is located to the north and south, the Hoskins Park and Environs (Dulwich Hill) HCA (labelled C36) is located to the west and the Dulwich Hill Commercial Precinct HCA (labelled C28) is located to the south (see Heritage map below).

 

Fig. 5 – MLEP 2011 Zoning map

Fig. 6 – MLEP 2011 Heritage map

 

Heritage Item Assessment

 

Council engaged a heritage consultant (Robertson & Hindmarsh) to provide an expert heritage assessment. A heritage assessment report was prepared and is included as ATTACHMENT 2 to this report.

 

73 The Boulevarde

 

The heritage assessment evaluates in the statement of significance that:

 

No. 73 The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill (“Bertsonie”) is of historical significance at a Local level as an example of an interwar bungalow that constituted an important component in the infill development of the inner west suburbs (in between earlier Victorian and Federation houses) as well as being the result of the demolition of larger houses and subdivision of their grounds. The ground floor plan remains almost intact and the original room uses are evident and so the house still allows an interpretation of the historic uses of the rooms and an understanding of the way of life. The survival of the original milk and bread delivery box is also significant in being a physical manifestation of a food supply system that is no longer extant but is of historical and social importance. The survival of the 1920s asbestos cement garage is of significance as tangible physical evidence of the spread of car ownership in the interwar period.

 

No. 73 The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill is of social significance as an example of the work of builder/developer, William Mitchell, who developed, financed and let houses in the wider Sydney area.

 

No. 73 The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill is of aesthetic significance at a Regional level because of the intact nature of the decorative ceilings, joinery, wall panelling and flooring in the Entry Vestibule, Cross Hall, Living Room, Dining Room, and Bedrooms 1, 2 & 3 are excellent examples of the application of Gustav Stickley’s Craftsman houses to the Australian upper middle class mass housing context. The intact inglenook is particularly rare in any housing in Australia, let alone suburban housing. Intact Craftsman interiors of this quality and size are rare in the Sydney context and rare in the speculative housing market.

 

The heritage assessment concludes:

 

It is recommended that No. 73 The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill be listed as an item of environmental heritage on the Marrickville LEP (including the interiors of the intact rooms, including the inglenook) and that all the features to be protected by being listed on Schedule 5 of the LEP.

 

73A The Boulevarde

 

The heritage assessment evaluates in the statement of significance that:

 

No 73A The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill is of historical significance at a Local level as an example of an interwar bungalow that constituted an important component in the infill development of the inner west suburbs (in between earlier Victorian and Federation houses) as well as being the result of the demolition of larger houses and subdivision of their grounds. The front portion of the ground floor plan remains almost intact and the original room uses are evident in this section.

 

No 73A The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill is of social significance as an example of the work of builder/developer, William Mitchell, who developed, financed and let houses in the wider Sydney area.

 

No 73A The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill is of aesthetic significance at a Local level because of the intact nature of the decorative ceilings, fireplaces and joinery in the front section of the house as applied to a house intended for the upper middle class mass housing market.

 

The heritage assessment concludes:

 

It is recommended that No. 73A The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill be listed as an item of environmental heritage on the Marrickville LEP (limited to the front garden, path & fence, the exterior of the front section of the house – i.e. in front of the first floor addition – and the interior of the front section of the house (including the interiors of the intact rooms, including the ceilings and fireplaces) and that all the features to be protected by being listed on Schedule 5 of the LEP.

 

 

 

Additional letter responding to heritage assessment prepared for the DA Applicant for Land and Environment Court proceedings

 

The expert heritage consultant Council engaged (Robertson & Hindmarsh) also provided a further letter responding to matters raised in the heritage assessments prepared by the DA Applicant, forming part of the Land and Environment Court proceedings that occurred in relation to the imposition of the IHO by Council. This letter is included as ATTACHMENT 3 to this report. This letter provides further documentary evidence and refutes contentions from these heritage assessments.

 

The heritage assessment report and further letter has established that the houses at 73 and 73A The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill meets the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage’s criteria for local heritage significance and recommends both properties being heritage listed. Accordingly, it is recommended that Council resolves to list 73 and 73A The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill, as items of environmental heritage on Schedule 5 of the MLEP 2011. It is recommended that Council submits the planning proposal and the advice of the Inner West Local Planning Panel to the Minister for Planning for a Gateway determination, in accordance with Section 3.34 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979.

 

Heritage Conservation Area Alterations

 

In regards to potential alterations to Council’s HCAs, the heritage assessment evaluates that:

 

The report by Sue Rosen Associates suggested that both Nos 73 & 73A The Boulevarde could be incorporated into an expanded Lewisham Heritage Conservation Area including Eltham Street. The housing in Eltham Street, and extending part of the way into the adjacent streets of The Boulevarde and Denison Road is primarily of the Victorian period and the houses have a consistency of form and, in most cases, of detailing that warrants further investigation by Inner West Council for a possible new Heritage Conservation Area or an addition to an existing Heritage Conservation Area. However, the two houses at Nos 73 & 73A The Boulevarde are interwar bungalows which is of a different period of construction and architectural style than the majority of the area surrounding Eltham Street. Whilst one of the characteristics of the Lewisham Heritage Conservation Area is a mixture of nineteenth and twentieth century architectural styles and building forms the consistency of the housing in the Eltham Street area may preclude the inclusion of these two interwar bungalows. Moreover, the two houses at Nos 73 & 73A The Boulevarde are separated from the Victorian period housing by a 1960s three-storey block of flats at No 71 The Boulevarde.

 

However, it is recommended that Council investigate the possibility of the two houses being listed as a small group constructed by the same builder (including interiors but excluding the non-original additions).

 

The heritage assessment concludes that:

 

It is recommended that Council investigate the creation of a Heritage Conservation Area centred on Eltham Street, Dulwich Hill. Refer to the attached map of the area for a suggested area for further investigation and evaluation.

 

It is not recommended that Nos. 73 & 73A The Boulevarde, Dulwich be included in any expanded or new Heritage Conservation Area but they be investigated for listing as a small group (including the interiors but excluding the modern additions) that was erected by the same builder, William Mitchell.

 

The investigations of the creation of potential amendment or additional HCAs will be considered as part of the new local environment plan and development control plan project for the Inner West Council and does not form part of the recommendations to Council in this report.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

Nil.

 

 

OTHER STAFF COMMENTS

The preliminary heritage assessment and review of the heritage assessment and this Council report has been undertaken by Council’s Team Leader - Heritage & Urban Design, Development Advisory Services.

 

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Public participation in the form of community consultation will occur should Council resolve to prepare a planning proposal to include Nos. 73 and 73A The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill as items of environmental heritage in Schedule 5 of the Marrickville Local Environmental Plan 2011.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

Gazette of Interim Heritage Order for 73 The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill

2.

Heritage Assessment of 73 The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill (and 73A The Boulevarde, Dulwich Hill) by Robertson & Hindmarsh

3.

Heritage response to L&EC heritage reports by Robertson & Hindmarsh

  


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

Item No:         C0818(3) Item 16

Subject:         Street Libraries in the Inner West           

Prepared By:     Caroline McLeod - Group Manager Library and History Services 

Authorised By:  John Warburton - Deputy General Manager Community and Engagement

 

SUMMARY

This paper discusses how Council can support street libraries.  The paper recommends Council grant Street Libraries Australia a one-off sum of $3,399, funded from the Library and History 18/19 collections operations budget, to fund 10 street libraries in the inner west.  It also recommends that street libraries be considered for inclusion in any future park upgrades and that Library and History support start up street libraries by providing discarded library books for their collections. 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT Council:

 

1.       Purchase the Street Library Australia Council Grant Pack at a cost of $3,399 to fund an additional 10 street libraries in the Inner West;

 

2.       Consider incorporating street libraries into the design of any future park  upgrades and/or community facilities if appropriate; and

 

3.       Support start-up street libraries in the inner west by donating up to 20 discarded library items / per street library as a starting point if requested.

 

 

 

BACKGROUND

At the extraordinary Council meeting on 3 July 2018, Council resolved (C0178 Item 9) that a response be prepared for Council’s consideration regarding potential to support street libraries across the Inner West.  Street Libraries have been growing in popularity across Australia and for the most part, are community or neighbourhood led.  

 

In Australia, the increase in street libraries can be attributed to a registered incorporated not for profit charity, Street Library Australia, which formed in 2015 in inner Sydney.   According to the Street Library Australia website, “as of September 2017, there are currently 401 registered Street Libraries in Australia. We estimate there is a total of 550 in Australia, which include unregistered ones.”  Based on information from the website, there are approximately 75 registered street libraries in the inner west.   There is no data available re the number of un-registered street libraries in the inner west. 

 

Parks Planning advises that Council has received requests from the community during community consultation sessions and throughout the year for street libraries in parks such as Camperdown Memorial Rest Park, Fleming Street Playground and Salmon Park. 

 

DISCUSSION

 

The value and benefits of street libraries replicate the values and benefits of a public library service.  These include encouraging lifelong learning, encouraging reading, participation in the share economy, building community and a sense of belonging.  

Below considers a range of options for how Council can support street libraries in the future, taking into consideration that:

 

 

·    Council currently operates eight libraries

·    Council currently offers a home library service to approximately 200 residents that have difficulty accessing a library

·    Street libraries are organic in nature and have been adopted in the inner west with little or no council support

·    Street Libraries Australia currently delivers a successful street libraries program and

·    Council has finite resources.

 

Based on the above, and given limited resources, it is recommended Council have a light-touch approach to its support of street libraries across the inner west. 

 

Options Regarding Street Libraries

 

When considering the options below, Library and History services will be able to assist any resident or group that is interested in hosting a street library by providing books (discarded from the library) as the starting point for the street library collections. 

 

Option 1:        Street Libraries Australia Grant Program 

 

Street Libraries Australia offers a Council Grant program where Council would purchase the Street Library Australia Council Grant Pack at a cost of $3,399.  In exchange Street Libraries Australia will:

 

·    provide 10 street libraries (including shipping) that have been built by volunteers at  107 Projects Redfern

·    set up a webpage for Council, promoting the concept and inviting local residents to become hosts

·    find 10 hosts in the Inner West Council LGA wishing to host and maintain a street library

·    ship the libraries to the hosts; encouraging them to decorate the libraries

·    keep Council up to date regarding when libraries have been registered.

 

If this option was pursued, street libraries would be located on business premises, schools or in residential areas such as front yards / nature strips (not Council land); therefore installation of the street library would be the responsibility of the grant recipient. 

 

The advantage of this program is that it involves few Council resources, it remains a community led program and Council is supporting an existing inner Sydney not for profit organisation.  Another advantage is that Council is not responsible for the maintenance of the structure or the content of the collection.   

 

Cost:  $3,399 for ten street libraries.  

 

Option 2:        Council considers and budgets for street libraries when planning park upgrades

 

Council could actively consider the inclusion of street libraries when planning for park upgrades and budget for the purchasing and installation of a street library as part of the park’s design.  It is recommended that Council source the street libraries from Street Library Australia. 

 

An advantage of this option is that Council has input and consideration regarding where the libraries are located ie in areas that are not close to one of Council’s eight libraries and appropriate to the park setting. 

A disadvantage of this option is that Council would be required to maintain the street library structure and the collection and be responsible for removing excess books if members of the community use the street library as a potential dumping place when cleaning out their book shelves (this is a common issue in the library).

 

Cost: the costs would be factored into the overall park upgrade.  Street Libraries range in cost from $200 (undecorated) to a custom designed structure of up to $2,800.  There would be additional costs for the building of any footings, ongoing maintenance and potentially the removal of unwanted books. 

 

Option 3:        Council operates a street library building / community engagement program

 

Option 3 would be for Council to operate a street library building program with local community groups such as the men’s / women’s sheds and these would then be placed throughout the Inner West LGA in parks and close to community facilities.    Council would be responsible for building the footings and maintain the library as per option 2. 

 

Council may be required to pay the group to facilitate these workshops and/or cover the costs of materials, which at this stage are unknown.   An advantage of this model is that the project could be used as a positive community development program to engage with seniors, the creative community etc.  A disadvantage of this option is that the costs at this stage are relatively unknown and it could be potentially resource heavy (staff-wise) to secure a group to deliver the program, assist with marketing etc.  In addition, Council would be replicating a service that is currently delivered at an affordable rate.   

 

Due to unknown costs and resource implications, this option is not recommended. 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

This project would be covered by the existing Library and History operational collection budget which would result in a reduction of the new items being purchased for the library.

 

If Council wanted to roll out more street libraries than the recommended 10, another funding source would need to be secured.

 

OTHER STAFF COMMENTS

The Group Manager Trees, Parks and Sports Fields has been consulted on this project and supports the recommendations. 

 

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Nil

 

CONCLUSION

Given the demonstrated level inner west community has adopted street libraries it is recommended that Council support street libraries by purchasing a Street Library Australia Grant Pack of ten libraries for the 18/19 financial year and that street libraries be considered in any future park or community facility upgrades. 

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

Nil.


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

Item No:         C0818(3) Item 17

Subject:         Referral of Draft 30 June 2018 Financial Statements for Audit           

Prepared By:     Carl Conrad - Financial Reporting Manager  

Authorised By:  Pav Kuzmanovski - Group Manager Finance

 

SUMMARY

The purpose of this report is to refer Council’s draft 2017/18 financial reports for the period to be audited by the Auditor General in accordance with s413 of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT Council refer Council’s draft 2017/18 financial reports for audit pursuant to S413

of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

 

 

BACKGROUND

Pursuant to Section 413 of the Local Government Act, which requires Council to prepare financial reports for each year and must refer them to audit as soon as practicably possible, this report is being tabled to request Council to endorse the release of the draft financial statements for audit.

 

The Audit Office of NSW under the Auditor General took control of the conduct of Local

Government audits in the previous financial year. Councils have since been required to have their financial reports audited by the Audit Office via its delegate.

 

Council’s audited financial reports will be tabled at the 23 October 2018 Council meeting for endorsement and subsequently placed on public exhibition for 28 days. A final report will be tabled at the 27 November 2018 Council meeting to table any comments made by the public and seek final endorsement of the financial reports.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

Nil.

 

OTHER STAFF COMMENTS

Nil.

 

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Nil.

 

CONCLUSION

Nil.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

Nil.


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

Item No:         C0818(3) Item 18

Subject:         Investment Report as at 30 June 2018           

Prepared By:     Brendhan Barry - Manager Financial Services  

Authorised By:  Pav Kuzmanovski - Group Manager Finance

 

SUMMARY

In accordance with the requirements of clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, Council is provided with a listing of all investments made pursuant to section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993 and reported for period ending 30 June 2018.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT the report be received and noted

 

 

 

BACKGROUND

Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 requires that a report be presented to Council each month listing all investments with a certification from the Responsible Accounting Officer. Attached to this report are further reports from Council’s Investment Advisors, Prudential Investment Services.

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

The Investment Holdings report (Attachment 1) for the period ending 30 June 2018 reflects Council’s holding in various investment categories these are listed in the table below. Council’s portfolio size sits at $203m, of which 85% was rated A rated or above.

 

 

SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENTS

Reporting has now been updated to include IWC’s exposures to Socially Responsible Investments (SRI). The SRI category incorporates the range of “Green”, “Climate” and “Social Equity” bonds Council currently holds and will expand as similar investments are utilised. The SRI category is separate from the Non-Fossil Fuel category, which will continue to be used for deposits with banks that do not lend to, or otherwise do business with, firms in the fossil fuel industry. 

 

These changes to the month end reports will better reflect Council’s commitment to socially responsible projects.  The reports provide specific details as to the allocation among the more “passive” non-fossil fuel term exposures versus the “active” targeting of socially responsible causes with the SRI bonds.

 

 


 

 

 


 

 

Council’s annualised return of continues to exceed the bank bill index benchmark. The period ending 30 June 2018, the portfolio for Inner West Council had a One-Month Portfolio Investment Return of 2.75%, above the UBSWA Bank Bill Index Benchmark (1.78%).

 

 

Council has a well-diversified portfolio with 85% of the portfolio spread among the top three credit rating categories (A long term / A2 short term and higher).

 


 

 

Council has a well-diversified portfolio invested among a range of term deposits and floating rate notes from highly rated Australian ADIs.   The graph above shows Council’s individual institution exposure compared with the investment policy limits.

 

 

 

The graph above demonstrates the term to maturity for Council’s investments compared to Council’s approved investment policy limits.


 

Environmental and Socially Responsible Commitments

 

The graph above illustrates the gap between yields received from Socially Responsible Investments (SRI), Fossil Fuel (FF) and Non Fossil Fuel (NFF) Investments.

 

Council’s holdings in NFF investments were $150.8m with the relative total portfolio percentage of 74% in NFF investments. Council’s holdings in SRI’s were $28.0m, with the relative total portfolio percentage of 14% in SRI. The attachments to this report summarise all investments held by Council and interest returns for periods ending 30 June 2018.

 

The Current Market value is required to be accounted for. The Current Market Value is a likely outcome if Council were to consider recalling the investment prior to its due date. All investments made for the month of June 2018 have been made in accordance with the Local Government Act, Local Government Regulations and the Inner West Council Investment Policy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

IWC Jun18

2.

IWC Economic and Investment Portfolio Commentary Jun18

3.

IWC Investment Portfolio Reports - Incorporating SRI exposures - July 2018

  


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

 

 

4 July 2018

 

 

Mr Pav Kuzmanovski

Group Manager Finance

Inner West Council

PO BOX 14

PETERSHAM NSW 2049

 

Dear Pav,

 

Investment Portfolio Reporting: Monitoring SRI Exposures

As requested, we have incorporated monitoring capabilities for Inner West Council’s exposures to Socially Responsible Investments (SRIs) within Council’s portfolio reports.

The SRI category incorporates the range of “Green”, “Climate” and “Social Equity” bonds Council currently holds and will expand as similar investments are utilised.

The SRI category is separate from the Non-Fossil Fuel category, which will continue to be used for deposits with banks that do not lend to, or otherwise do business with, firms in the fossil fuel industry. 

These changes to the month end reports will better reflect Council’s commitment to socially responsible projects.  The reports provide specific details as to the allocation among the more “passive” non-fossil fuel term exposures versus the “active” targeting of socially responsible causes with the SRI bonds.

·                      

·                     Yours sincerely,


 

·                     Erik Gates

Director

 

 


 


Monitoring Council’s Exposures in Socially Responsible Investments

Background

Inner West Council has been proactive in favouring non-fossil fuel lending banks when making deposits, thereby reducing its exposure to term deposits with fossil fuel aligned banks to approximately 12% of its $200+m investment portfolio. 

Council now has over $150m in deposits/securities with non-fossil fuel aligned banks.  These banks are typically much smaller and lower rated than the large banks that lend to businesses in the fossil fuel industry.  These smaller banks do not have the scope of business to work with firms in the fossil fuel industry, instead focusing on retail and small business banking. 

In addition, Council has also been actively investing in “Socially Responsible” bonds issued by the major banks.  The proceeds from these bond sales are earmarked for a range of specific socially responsible projects.   

To date, Council has exposure to the following Socially Responsible Bonds:

·    $14.2m in the CBA Mar 2022 ‘Climate Bonds’ whose proceeds from the bond sale were used to finance wind farms and low carbon transport projects.

                           

·    $8.4m in the Westpac Jun 2021 ‘Climate Bonds’ whose proceeds from the bond sale were used to finance “a portfolio of Australian domiciled wind-farms and low carbon commercial buildings”;

 

·    $2m in the ANZ Jun 2020 ‘Green Bond’ whose proceeds from the bond sale were used to “finance a pool of Eligible Assets that directly contribute to developing low-carbon industries, technologies and practices. Specifically, wind farms, solar energy projects and green buildings.”

 

·    $3.4m in the NAB March 2022 ‘Social (Gender Equality) Bond’ whose proceeds are only allocated to borrowers that have been certified as Employers of Choice for Gender Equality by the Workplace Gender Equality Agency.  Business involved in major environmental, social or governance controversies are also excluded.  Also, business whose primary activities involve alcohol, gambling, tobacco, military weapons, predatory lending, fossil fuels, palm oil, transport of cattle or whaling are excluded. 

 

Therefore, these investments provide Council with the opportunity to target funds to socially responsible projects.  These bonds have the full backing of the issuing bank and their security is not subject to the success of the underlying projects/borrowers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change to Reports

To better monitor Council’s Socially Responsible Investment portfolio holdings the following changes to the month end reports have been made:

       

1)   A new category in the “Current Breakdown” of Council’s portfolio showing Socially Responsible Investments separate from deposits in non-fossil fuel lending ADIs:

 

                            

2)   Historical graphic representation of the data above, showing individual percentage exposures of non-FF and SRI investments as well as a combined percentage of non-FF and SRI holdings overlaying the total portfolio size:

                          

           

 

3)   Graphic representation of the weighted average yield of Council’s FF, non-FF and SRI categories:

 

          

 

Note: the SRI category consists of longer dated bonds and will therefore often have higher yields than the FF and non-FF categories which typically consists of shorter dated term deposits.


 

 

4)   Council’s Investment Policy Compliance charts showing the colour coded FF, non-FF and SRI components separately:

                     

                

                  

 


 

 

 

5)   Upcoming investment holding maturities, going out 2 years, colour coded by FF, non-FF and SRI:

 

 

 

These changes to the month end reports will better reflect Council’s commitment to socially responsible projects.  The reports provide specific details as to the allocation among the more “passive” non-fossil fuel term exposures versus the “active” targeting of socially responsible causes with the SRI bonds. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Disclaimer:  The statements and opinions contained in this report are based on currently prevailing conditions in financial markets and are so contained in good faith and in the belief that such statements and opinion are not false or misleading.  In preparing this report, Prudential Investment Services Corp has relied upon information which it believes to be reliable and accurate.  Prudential Investment Services Corp believes that this report and the opinions expressed in this report are accurate, but no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given.  Prudential Investment Services Corp does not warrant that its investigation has revealed all of the matters which a more extensive examination might disclose.  This report may not be reproduced, transmitted, or made available either in part or in whole to any third party without the prior written consent of Prudential Investment Services Corp.  AFS Licence No. 468145.


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

Item No:         C0818(3) Item 19

Subject:         Investment Report as at 31 July 2018           

Prepared By:     Brendhan Barry - Manager Financial Services  

Authorised By:  Pav Kuzmanovski - Group Manager Finance

 

SUMMARY

In accordance with the requirements of clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, Council is provided with a listing of all investments made pursuant to section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993 and reported for period ending 31 July 2018.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT the report be received and noted.

 

 

 

BACKGROUND

Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 requires that a report be presented to Council each month listing all investments with a certification from the Responsible Accounting Officer. Attached to this report are further reports from Council’s Investment Advisors, Prudential Investment Services.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

The Investment Holdings report (Attachment 1) for the period ending 31 July 2018 reflects Council’s holding in various investment categories these are listed in the table below. Council’s portfolio size sits at $202.4m, of which 81% was rated A rated or above. All Socially Responsible Investments (SRI’s) are investments that comply with the Non Fossil Fuel standards.

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

Council’s annualised return of continues to exceed the bank bill index benchmark. The period ending 31 July 2018, the portfolio for Inner West Council had a One-Month Portfolio Investment Return of 2.87%, above the UBSWA Bank Bill Index Benchmark (2.26%).

 

 

 

Council has a well-diversified portfolio with 81% of the portfolio spread among the top three credit rating categories (A long term / A2 short term and higher).

 


 

 

Council has a well-diversified portfolio invested among a range of term deposits and floating rate notes from highly rated Australian ADIs.   The graph above shows Council’s individual institution exposure compared with the investment policy limits.

 

 

 

The graph above demonstrates the term to maturity for Council’s investments compared to Council’s approved investment policy limits.

 


 

Environmental and Socially Responsible Commitments

 

 

The graph above illustrates the gap between yields received from Socially Responsible Investments (SRI), Fossil Fuel (FF) and Non Fossil Fuel (NFF) Investments. All Socially Responsible Investments are also Non Fossil Fuel Investments.

 

 

Council’s holdings in NFF / SRI’s was $184.8m with the relative total portfolio percentage of 92%.

 

Council’s holdings in NFF investments were $152.8m with the relative total portfolio percentage of 76%.

 

Council’s holdings in SRI’s were $32.0m, with the relative total portfolio percentage of 16%.

 

The attachments to this report summarise all investments held by Council and interest returns for periods ending 31 July 2018.

The Current Market value is required to be accounted for. The Current Market Value is a likely outcome if Council were to consider recalling the investment prior to its due date.

 

All investments made for the month of July 2018 have been made in accordance with the Local Government Act, Local Government Regulations and the Inner West Council Investment Policy.

 

 

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

IWC Jul18

2.

IWC Economic and Investment Portfolio Commentary Jul18

  


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

Item No:         C0818(3) Item 20

Subject:         Status of Legal Proceedings           

Prepared By:     Joe Strati - General Counsel 

Authorised By:  Rik Hart - Interim General Manager

 

SUMMARY

This report provides Council with a summary of legal proceedings in which Council is involved.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

THAT the Report be received and noted.

 

 

BACKGROUND

This report provides Council with a summary of legal proceedings in which Council is involved.

It does not include the following types of legal proceedings:

 

1.       Proceedings that are managed by Council’s insurers;

 

2.       Local Court proceedings involving an appeal against a parking fine; and

 

3.       Proceedings for the recovery of debts where those proceedings are being run by council’s external debt collection agency.

 

The report is current to 3 August 2018. It does not capture changes that have occurred between that date and the date the report is considered by Council.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

Nil.

 

OTHER STAFF COMMENTS

Nil.

 

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Nil.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

Summary of Legal Proceedings as at 3 August 2018

  


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

 


Council Meeting

28 August 2018

 

Item No:         C0818(3) Item 21

Subject:         Notice of Motion: Glebe Island Proposals: Inner West Working With City Of Sydney           

From:             Councillor John Stamolis  

 

 

Motion:

 

THAT Council:

 

1.   Engage with City of Sydney Council to respond to major community concerns in regard to the proposals for Glebe Island.  Discussions between the two Councils should address:

 

·    Proximity of industrial working harbour activities to high density residential;

·    Potential for significant noise impacts;

·    Impact on air quality;

·    Proposing 24/7 operations next to high density residential;

·    Major increases in traffic and trucks movements;

·    Significant environmental effects: sediment disturbance and contamination; and

·    The departure from the Bays Precinct Plan.

 

2.   Report back on an appropriate response to State Government in regard to the above concerns and any others issues identified by the two Councils.

 

Background

 

For several years the Bays Precinct Transformation process has been sold to Sydney as a visionary, future-oriented and highly consultative process.  It was to be one of Sydneys’ great transformational planning programs. 

 

The Bays process provided Sydney-siders with the opportunity to look beyond the concept of Sydney Harbour as an “industrial working harbour” to Sydney Harbour being the most significant asset to the people of NSW.  Sydney Harbour should become a place where natural beauty takes precedence over working harbour, not the other way around.  It should be a place that is globally renown.

 

White Bay and Glebe Island were slated as early stage projects for the Bays Precinct transformation.  This included a technology or innovation hub (e.g. Google), education, tourism, access to the foreshore, open space, improved public transport and other modern amenity.  The jobs created by such use would be significant.

 

Today, the enthusiasm that communities held for the future of Glebe Island and the broader Bays Precinct has now turned to major concern and disappointment.  Communities are faced with the return of 24/7 industrial working harbour and a range of other intensive industrial activities.  This will have major impacts on many residents; disrupting their lives and well-being and will remove the opportunity for the people of Sydney and visitors to experience the potential of the Bays Precinct.    

 

State Government has chosen to depart from it’s vision for White Bay and Glebe Island.  It will wind back the clock more than 50 years to re-impose intensive 24/7 industrial working harbour on Glebe Island.

 

Residents in Balmain, White Bay, Annandale, Pyrmont, Ultimo and Glebe are expressing major concern about what the future will hold for them and what will face them if the proposals are approved.  In particular, White Bay, Pyrmont and Ultimo have fundamentally changed since the old days of 24/7 industrial working harbour.  These areas are now packed with high density multi-storey residences. Pyrmont and Ultimo have close to the highest residential densities in the nation. 

 

It was State Government which decided that high density residential would be approved for these areas.  Now it wants to return 24/7 industrial activity next to these areas. 

Increases in traffic and truck movements as a result of these proposals has been well documented and reported on.  This area feeds immediately onto the already highly congested Citywest Link and Anzac Bridge.

 

It is essential that the two Councils’ which surround the Bays Precinct (City of Sydney and Inner West Council), whose communities will face the full impact of intensive industrial use of the Bays Precinct, should work together to help its communities. 

 

It is also important that our Councils show consistency to our people.  During the Bays Precinct process we highlighted how active and visionary our Councils were throughout this process.  Now we need to demonstrate the same level of activity in the interests of our communities when circumstances become more difficult.

The proposals for Glebe Island are:

 

·    Glebe Island: Multi-User Facility - this would involve the construction and operation of a multi-user facility for the import, storage and distribution of dry bulk materials (e.g. sand and aggregates).  It would operate 24 hours per day, seven days per week.

 

·    Relocation of Hanson Construction concrete batching plant to Glebe Island

 

·    Stage 3 Westconnex - use of White Bay as a construction staging site for WestConnex and the Western Harbour Tunnel.

Residents within the Inner West Council and City of Sydney have expressed strong concern about the recently announced proposals for Glebe Island.  The concerns relate to:

 

·    Proximity of industrial working harbour activities to high density residential

·    Potential for significant noise impacts

·    Impact on air quality

·    Major increases in traffic and truck movements

·    Proposing 24/7 operations next to high density residential

·    Significant environmental effects: sediment disturbance and contamination

·    The departure from the Bays Precinct Plan

 

Officer’s Comments:

 

Comment from Group Manager Strategic Planning:

Establishing discussions with City of Sydney Council staff and preparing a report back to Council on the matters identified would require approximately 4 days of Strategic Planning staff time and would cost $2,800, diverting the staff currently working on the proposal for the extension of Annandale Heritage Conservation Area.

 

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

Nil.