Local Traffic Committee Meeting 4 September 2018 |
Minutes of Local Traffic Committee Meeting
Held at Petersham Service Centre on 4 September 2018
Meeting commenced at 10.03am
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY BY CHAIRPERSON
I acknowledge the Gadigal and Wangal people of the Eora nation on whose country we are meeting today, and their elders past and present.
COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT
Clr Julie Passas |
Chair, Deputy Mayor – Ashfield Ward |
Mr Bill Holliday |
Representative for Jamie Parker MP, Member for Balmain |
Mr Chris Woods |
Representative for Ron Hoenig MP, Member for Heffron |
Ms Sarina Foulstone |
Representative for Jo Haylen MP, Member for Summer Hill |
Sgt John Micallef |
NSW Police – Burwood Police Area Command |
A/Sgt Charles Buttrose |
NSW Police – Leichhardt Police Area Command |
Sgt Paul Vlachos |
NSW Police – Inner West Police Area Command |
Mr Ryan Horne |
Roads and Maritime Services |
|
|
OFFICERS IN ATTENDANCE |
|
|
|
SC Anthony Kenny |
NSW Police – Inner West Police Area Command |
SC Sam Tohme |
NSW Police – Burwood Police Area Command |
Mr Asith Nagodavithane |
Transit Systems – Inner West Bus Services |
Mr Bob Moore |
Inner West Bicycle Coalition |
Clr Marghanita Da Cruz |
Leichhardt Ward |
Mr John Stephens |
IWC’s Traffic and Transport Services Manager |
Mr Manod Wickramasinghe |
IWC’s Coordinator Traffic and Parking Services (North) |
Mr George Tsaprounis |
IWC’s Coordinator Traffic and Parking Services (South) |
Mr David Yu |
IWC’s Engineer – Traffic and Parking Services |
Mr Boris Muha |
IWC’s Engineer – Traffic and Parking Services |
Ms Jenny Adams |
IWC’s Engineer – Traffic and Parking Services |
Mr Joe Di Cesare |
IWC’s Coordinator Design Services |
Mr Davide Torresan |
IWC’s Civil Engineer |
Ms Ranji Nadarajah |
IWC’s Civil Engineer |
Ms Mary Bailey |
IWC’s Parking Planner |
Ms Christina Ip |
IWC’s Business Administration Officer |
|
|
VISITORS |
|
|
|
Mr Phillip Lineham |
Item 10 - Resident |
Mr John Golinelli |
Item 10 - Resident |
Mr Luc Streit |
Item 10 - Resident |
Mr Ron Page |
Item 10 - Resident |
|
|
APOLOGIES: |
|
|
|
Mr Wal Petschler |
IWC’s Group Manager, Roads, Traffic and Stormwater |
|
|
DISCLOSURES OF INTERESTS:
The representative for the Member for Heffron declared a non-pecuniary interest in Item 8 as he resides in one of the streets adjacent to Blamire Lane.
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
The Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on Tuesday, 7 August 2018 were confirmed. |
MATTERS ARISING FROM COUNCIL’S RESOLUTION OF MINUTES
The Local Traffic Committee recommendations of its meeting held on 7 August 2018 were adopted at Council’s meeting held on 28 August 2018, with the exception of LTC0818 Item 4 in which Council requested that the alternative plan devised for a resident be referred to the September Local Traffic Committee meeting for its consideration.
LTC0918 Item 18 Dixson Avenue, Dulwich Hill –Traffic Calming Design Plan 10005 – Intersection narrowing and threshold treatment at Old Canterbury Road (Ashfield Ward /Summer Hill Electorate/ Ashfield & Inner West LAC) |
A detailed design plan for the proposed traffic calming improvements in Dixson Avenue, Dulwich Hill at its intersection with Old Canterbury Road, as part of the Dulwich Hill North LATM study implementation, was finalised and presented at the 7 August 2018 Traffic Committee meeting (LTC0818 Item 4) for approval. A resident of Dixson Avenue attended and objected to the proposal as it resulted in the loss of two parking spaces. The resident stated that there is the potential to retain one of the parking spaces if the kerb extension was reduced. The resident also attended Council’s meeting of 28 August 2018 and Council resolved to resubmit the matter back to the Committee for consideration.
Officer’s Recommendation
For the Traffic Committee to consider.
DISCUSSION
Council Officers presented the alternative design plan (Option 2) for the proposed traffic calming improvements as first presented by the resident at the Council meeting. Council Officers explained the differences between the two design plans:
Option 1 (the original design presented at August LTC meeting): · There will be a loss of two parking spaces. · The centre line remains as is. · Service vehicles can make left and right turns without crossing the centre line. · First car parking space not located within 10m of the intersection.
Option 2: · There will be a loss of one parking space. · One parking space will be within the statutory 10m zone. · It is proposed that the centre line be moved 1m across to accommodate turning circles. However, service vehicles turning left or right would still cross the centre line.
Council Officers explained in relation to Option 2 that the parking space, although closer than 10m to the intersection, it would be indented and on the downstream to traffic so sightlines to pedestrians was clear.
The RMS representative stated that he had no concerns with retaining a parking space in the ‘No Stopping’ zone in Option 2 as the sight distance is adequate at the corner. However, the representative was concerned with vehicles having to negotiate a more complex turn and vehicles crossing the centre line. The representative suggested removing the parking space outside No.5 Dixson Avenue as it appears this space causes vehicles to cross the centre line.
The RMS representative also stated that the proposed at-grade threshold at the entry of Dixson Street is not necessary. The representative advised that at-grade thresholds are typically used for gateway treatments for 40km/h zones with high pedestrian activity. He stated that black asphalt is more appropriate for Dixson Street as it is a 50km/h zone and a low pedestrian activity area. The representative raised a concern that entry threshold treatments used in high pedestrian areas could lose their effect if they became a common treatment for streets with low pedestrian activity.
Council Officers commented that the proposed threshold treatment came from the Dulwich Hill North Local Area Traffic Management study which recommended encouraging slower speeds in the area and is not a treatment for every street. Council Officers stated that Dixson Street would have relatively few truck movements.
The Police representative supported Option 2 given the low usage of the streets by trucks and the retention of an extra parking space.
The Committee members agreed to endorse Option 2 and agreed with the removal of the at-grade threshold at the entry to Dixson Street.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
THAT:
1. Option 2 of the detailed design plan of the kerb extension and associated signs and line markings at the intersection of Dixson Avenue and Old Canterbury Road, Dulwich Hill be APPROVED. 2. The new at-grade threshold be removed from the design plan.
For motion: Unanimous
|
Meeting closed at 11.53am.