Local Traffic Committee Meeting Minutes 7 September 2020 |
Minutes of Local Traffic Committee Meeting
Held electronically in September 2020
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY BY CHAIRPERSON
I acknowledge the Gadigal and Wangal people of the Eora nation on whose country we are meeting today, and their elders past and present.
COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT
Clr Victor Macri |
Councillor – Midjuburi-Marrickville Ward (Chair) |
Zack Solomon |
Representative for Jo Haylen MP, Member for Summer Hill |
Chris Woods |
Representative for Ron Hoenig MP, Member for Heffron |
SC Tony Kenny |
NSW Police - Inner West Police Area Command |
Tanmila Samin Islam |
Transport for NSW (TfNSW) |
|
|
NON VOTING MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE |
|
|
|
Adrian Prichard |
Transit Systems – Inner West Bus Services |
Peter Whitney |
Transit Systems – Inner West Bus Services |
Manod Wickramasinghe |
IWC’s Traffic and Transport Planning Manager |
Sunny Jo |
IWC’s Traffic and Parking Planner |
Christina Ip |
IWC’s Business Administration Officer |
|
|
VISITORS |
|
|
|
Nil. |
|
|
|
APOLOGIES: |
|
|
|
Nil. |
|
|
|
DISCLOSURES OF INTERESTS:
Nil.
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
The minutes of the Local Traffic Committee meeting held in August 2020 were confirmed. |
MATTERS ARISING FROM COUNCIL’S RESOLUTION OF MINUTES
The Local Traffic Committee recommendations of its meeting held in August 2020 were adopted at Council’s meeting held on 25 August 2020, subject to the following amendments:
1. Not adopting LTC0820 Item 4 Chandos Street, Haberfield - Proposed Intersection Modification;
2. Note the safety concerns of residents on Chandos Street;
3. Note that the IWC Local Area Improvement Strategy (LAIS), relied in the report to the Traffic Committee, was written prior to the opening of the M4 East tunnel. As such it does not contain current traffic data, and needs to be updated and reviewed prior to any local road closures being implemented;
4. Note that Transport for NSW has advised it has received over 3,000 submissions to their proposed changes to local roads in the area and will provide a further consultation report in September 2020;
5. Write to Transport NSW to provide an updated traffic study for the area as required by a condition of the opening of the M4 East; fund council to review and implement the IWC LAIS in the light of the traffic study;
6. LTC0820 Item 5 Tempe South Draft Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Study - A further LATM Study be undertaken of the impact of traffic on students at Tempe Public and Tempe High School, and associated streets including Edwin Street and Tramway Street Tempe and the treatments be reviewed in the light of the additional study; and
7. LTC0820 Item 10 Traffic in Alt Street, Ashfield - Council note that staff will be arranging a pedestrian/traffic volume count to determine if the site meets the warrants for a crossing. The Ashfield Traffic Management Study (ATMS) also recommended the need to calm traffic in Alt Street at this location.
EMAIL CONFIRMATION OF OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION
The Transit Systems representative supported all the Officer’s recommendations.
The representative for NSW Police – Inner West supported the Officer’s recommendations for the items in their PAC.
The Lilyfield Precinct Parking Study reviewed the location, supply, demand and distribution of short and long stay parking, commercial, residential, employee, and commuter parking. The work consisted of examining existing conditions including parking data, community submissions, observed parking conditions, existing permit allocation, and future land uses within the Lilyfield precinct. A community survey was also undertaken to gauge the parking issues faced by different users. With consideration future sporting events at Leichhardt Oval, a draft parking management strategy for Lilyfield was developed.
Officer’s Recommendation
THAT:
1. The Draft Lilyfield Precinct Parking Study including the Draft Lilyfield Parking Strategy be endorsed for community consultation; and 2. The draft report be placed on Public Exhibition, providing a minimum 28 days for submissions and the results be reported back to the Traffic Committee.
DISCUSSION
The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
THAT:
1. The Draft Lilyfield Precinct Parking Study including the Draft Lilyfield Parking Strategy be endorsed for community consultation; and 2. The draft report be placed on Public Exhibition, providing a minimum 28 days for submissions and the results be reported back to the Traffic Committee.
For motion: Unanimous
|
The Balmain East Precinct Parking Study reviewed the location, supply, demand and distribution of short and long stay parking, commercial, residential, employee, and commuter parking. The work consisted of examining existing conditions including parking data, community submissions, observed parking conditions, existing permit allocation, and future land uses within the Balmain East precinct. A community survey was also undertaken to gauge the parking issues faced by different users. This led to the development of a draft parking strategy for Balmain East.
Officer’s Recommendation
THAT:
1. The Draft Balmain East Precinct Parking Study including the Draft Balmain East Parking Strategy be endorsed for community consultation; and
2. The draft report be placed on Public Exhibition, providing a minimum 28 days for submissions and the results be reported back to the Traffic Committee.
DISCUSSION
The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
THAT:
1. The Draft Balmain East Precinct Parking Study including the Draft Balmain East Parking Strategy be endorsed for community consultation; and
2. The draft report be placed on Public Exhibition, providing a minimum 28 days for submissions and the results be reported back to the Traffic Committee.
For motion: Unanimous |
LTC0920 Item 11 Gordon Crescent, Stanmore - Proposed
‘No Parking 7AM-7PM – Motor
Vehicles under 4.5t GVM Excepted’ restrictions |
Council has received concerns of long-term parking of certain vehicles, including boat and other trailers, oversized vehicles and in some instance’s caravans, in Gordon Crescent. Council subsequently proposed ‘No Parking 7AM-7PM – Motor Vehicles under 4.5t GVM Excepted’ restrictions in an attempt to resolve this matter.
Officer’s Recommendation
THAT the following ‘No Parking 7AM-7PM – Motor Vehicles under 4.5t GVM Excepted’ restrictions along Gordon Crescent, between Stanley Street and Douglas Street be approved:
1. A 24-metre ‘No Parking 7AM-7PM – Motor Vehicles under 4.5t GVM Excepted’ section from existing ‘No Parking’ signage, opposite Property No. 36 to opposite 52A Gordon Crescent, Stanmore; 2. A 140-metre ‘No Parking 7AM-7PM – Motor Vehicles under 4.5t GVM Excepted’ section from 12 metres east of above proposed ‘10P’ section, opposite Property No. 52 to the intersection of Gordon Crescent and Bruce Street; 3. A 145-metre ‘No Parking 7AM-7PM – Motor Vehicles under 4.5t GVM Excepted’ section beginning from 22 metres east of above proposed ‘10P’ section, to opposite rear of 5 Douglas Street, 12 metre west of existing pram ramp; and 4. A 49-metre ‘No Parking 7AM-7PM – Motor Vehicles under 4.5t GVM Excepted’ section beginning east of existing pram ramp to existing car share signage.
DISCUSSION
Council Officers advised that Council has received a petition in support of the proposed restrictions. The petition included 33 signatures from 27 properties. Council Officer stated that the head petitioner advised that both the consulted and modified/recommended proposals are supported by residents, but the proposal as recommended is preferred by the majority of residents.
The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
THAT the following ‘No Parking 7AM-7PM – Motor Vehicles under 4.5t GVM Excepted’ restrictions along Gordon Crescent, between Stanley Street and Douglas Street be approved:
1. A 24-metre ‘No Parking 7AM-7PM – Motor Vehicles under 4.5t GVM Excepted’ section from existing ‘No Parking’ signage, opposite Property No. 36 to opposite 52A Gordon Crescent, Stanmore; 2. A 140-metre ‘No Parking 7AM-7PM – Motor Vehicles under 4.5t GVM Excepted’ section from 12 metres east of above proposed ‘10P’ section, opposite Property No. 52 to the intersection of Gordon Crescent and Bruce Street; 3. A 145-metre ‘No Parking 7AM-7PM – Motor Vehicles under 4.5t GVM Excepted’ section beginning from 22 metres east of above proposed ‘10P’ section, to opposite rear of 5 Douglas Street, 12 metre west of existing pram ramp; and 4. A 49-metre ‘No Parking 7AM-7PM – Motor Vehicles under 4.5t GVM Excepted’ section beginning east of existing pram ramp to existing car share signage.
For motion: Unanimous
|
General Business
This concluded the business of the meeting.