Minutes of Extraordinary Council Meeting held on 28 April
2026 at Ashfield Service Centre
Meeting commenced at 7.30pm
|
Present:
|
|
Chloe
Smith
Izabella
Antoniou
Liz Atkins
Olivia
Barlow
Andrew Blake
Jo
Carlisle
Vicki Clay
Jessica
D’Arienzo
Kerrie
Fergusson
Mat Howard
Victor
Macri
Vittoria
Raciti
Philippa
Scott
Ismet
Tastan
Peter
Gainsford
Simone
Plummer
|
Deputy
Mayor
Councillor
(Attended remotely)
Councillor
Councillor
Councillor
Councillor
Councillor
Councillor
Councillor
Councillor
Councillor
Councillor
Councillor
(Entered the meeting at 7:31 pm)
Councillor
General
Manager
Director
Planning
|
|
Ruth
Callaghan
|
Director
Community
|
|
Sharon
Bowman
Peter
Shields
Manod
Wickramasinghe
Matthew
Pearce
|
Director
Corporate
Acting Director
Property and Major Projects
Acting Director
Engineering
General
Counsel
|
|
George
Georgakis
Daniel
East
Esther
Cheong
Rory Toomey
Jarrad
Sheather
Kendall
Banfield
Lynne
Sheridan
Aleksandar
Spasenovski
Megan
Jenkins
Katherine
Paixao
Tia
Camelin
|
Administration
Manager
Senior
Manager Strategic Planning
Consultant
- Director - Atlas Economics
City
Architect
Senior
Strategic Planner – Planning Policy
Senior Strategic
Transport Planner
Consultant
– Executive Director Planning and Special Projects - Berrys Bay Studio
Major
Projects Manager
Senior
Lawyer
Business
Paper Coordinator
Business
Paper Officer
|
APOLOGIES
AND REQUEST FOR REMOTE PARTICIPATION:
Motion:
(Macri/Atkins)
1.
That leave of absence for the Mayor,
Councillor Byrne be granted.
2.
That Council accept Councillor Antoniou’s
request to attend tonight’s Council meeting via audio-visual link due to
personal reasons.
Motion
Carried
For Motion: Crs
Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard,
Macri, Raciti, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Absent: Cr Scott
Councillor Scott
entered the Meeting at 7:31 pm
DISCLOSURES
OF INTEREST:
Councillor
Macri declared a non-significant non-pecuniary interest in Item 2 - Public
Exhibition - Draft Inner West Development Control Plan as his relatives own
property in the Local Government Area. He will remain in the meeting during
discussion and voting on the matter as the conflict is such that it will not
influence him carrying out his public duty.
Councillor
Raciti declared a significant pecuniary interest in Item 2 - Public
Exhibition - Draft Inner West Development Control Plan as she has
investment property in the Local Government Area. She will leave the meeting
during discussion and voting on the matter.
Councillor
Barlow declared a non-significant non-pecuniary interest in Item 2 - Public
Exhibition - Draft Inner West Development Control Plan as her family member
owns property in the Local Government Area. She will remain in the meeting
during discussion and voting on the matter as the conflict is such that it will
not influence her carrying out her public duty.
Councillor
Atkins declared a non-significant non-pecuniary interest in Item 2 - Public
Exhibition - Draft Inner West Development Control Plan as they own property
in Stanmore which is their Principal Place of Residence. They will remain in
the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter as the conflict is such,
it will not influence them in carrying out their public duty.
Councillor D'Arienzo declared a non-significant
non-pecuniary interest in Item 1 - Inner West Affordable Housing Policy as
she works as a Senior Advisor in the Office of The Hon Rose Jackson, Minister
for Housing and Homelessness, who has responsibility for the Ministerial
Affordable Housing Guidelines. She has had no involvement in the development of
the Inner West Council Draft Affordable Housing Policy in her capacity as a
Senior Advisor in Minister Jackson’s office. Out of an abundance of
caution she declares the conflict and will remain in the meeting during
discussion and voting on the matter.
Councillor
D'Arienzo declared a non-significant non-pecuniary interest in Item 2 - Public
Exhibition - Draft Inner West Development Control Plan as her Principal
Place of Residence is located in the Local Government Area and her sister and
her wife hold interests in a residential property in the Local Government Area.
As these interests do not reasonably influence any decision she makes on voting
on the Development Control Plan, she will remain in the meeting during
discussion and voting on the matter.
Councillor
Carlisle declared a non-significant non-pecuniary interest in Item 2 - Public
Exhibition - Draft Inner West Development Control Plan as her Principal Place
of Residence is located in the Local Government Area and she has an indirect
business interest through her partner in the Local Government Area. She will
remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter as the
conflict is such that it will not influence her carrying out her public duty.
Councillor
Scott declared a non-significant non-pecuniary interest in Item 2 - Public
Exhibition - Draft Inner West Development Control Plan as her Principal
Place of Residence is located in the Local Government Area. As this is a non-significant
non-pecuniary interest, she will remain in the meeting during discussion and
voting on the matter.
Councillor
Clay declared a non-significant non-pecuniary interest in Item 2 - Public
Exhibition - Draft Inner West Development Control Plan as her primary
residence is in the Stanmore-Damun Ward. She will remain in the meeting
for discussion and voting as the conflict is such that it will not influence
her in carrying out her public duty.
Councillor
Howard declared a non-significant non-pecuniary interest in Item 2 - Public
Exhibition - Draft Inner West Development Control Plan as he holds interest
in a residential property in the Local Government Area that is his Principal Place
of Residence and his brother and his husband hold interest in a residential
property in the Local Government Area which he rents. These interests do not
reasonably influence any discussion he makes in relation to voting on the
Development Control Plan. He will remain in the meeting during discussion and
voting on the matter.
Councillor
Fergusson declared a non-significant non-pecuniary interest in Item 2 - Public
Exhibition - Draft Inner West Development Control Plan as her Principal
Place of Residence is within the Local Government Area. She will remain in the
meeting during discussion and voting on the matter as the conflict is such that
it will not influence her carrying out her public duty.
Councillor
Antoniou declared a non-significant non-pecuniary interest in Item 2 - Public
Exhibition - Draft Inner West Development Control Plan as familial
associates of hers are connected to Century Venues, which operates multiple
sites in the Local Government Area and therefore hold business interests. As
this is an indirect interest and will not influence her carrying out her public
duty, she will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on the
matter.
The
Deputy Mayor Councillor Smith declared a non-significant non-pecuniary interest
in Item 2 - Public Exhibition - Draft Inner West Development Control Plan as
she holds interest in a residential property being her Principal Place of
Residence within the Local Government Area and her mother and sister also hold
interests which are their Principal Place of Residence located in the Local
Government Area. She will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on
the matter as the conflict is such that it will not influence her in carrying
out her public duty.
|
C0426(2) Item 1
Inner West Affordable Housing Policy
|
|
Motion:
(D’Arienzo/Carlisle)
1. That Council
reconfirms our commitment to fostering inclusive, diverse and sustainable
communities by ensuring that affordable rental housing remains accessible to
very low, low and moderate income households. Housing affordability is
fundamental to the economic vitality of the Inner West, enabling workers,
residents and families to live in the communities where they work and belong.
Council actively facilitates partnerships with government agencies and
community housing providers to expand the supply of affordable rental housing
across the Inner West, and ensures that development contributions reflect
both our affordable housing needs and the broader infrastructure requirements
of our growing community.
2. That:
a)
Council notes that the draft affordable housing policy
recommends 10% contribution for residential/commercial rezonings and 7.5% for
industrial rezonings; and
b) prior
to exhibition the affordable housing contribution rate be amended so that
when a developer led planning proposal seeks to amend a development standard
or a zone that the contribution rate is the same for industrial land as for
residential / commercial.
3.
That Council publicly exhibit
the draft Inner West Affordable Housing Policy for a period of at least 35
days beginning in May and seek feedback from relevant stakeholders and the
community on the proposed policy. Engagement strategies will include:
a)
Seeking survey feedback from
Your Say Inner West (YSIW) subscribers;
b)
Seeking feedback via social
media and digital notice boards at libraries and services centres;
c)
Consulting with
Council’s Housing for All Local Democracy Group;
d)
Hosting a workshop with
representatives from all local democracy groups;
e)
Seeking feedback from Homes
NSW, Aboriginal Housing Office, NSW Department of Planning, Housing and
Infrastructure, Community Housing Industry Association (CHIA), Faith Housing
Alliance and Shelter NSW;
f)
Direct consultation with
Community Housing Providers and other not for profit housing providers;
g)
Seeking feedback from Inner
West Creative Network, Create NSW, National Art School, Writers NSW, Sydney
Fringe, Brand X, and other relevant arts and cultural organisations;
h)
Hosting a roundtable with
Committee for Sydney, Shelter NSW, CHIA, Faith Housing Alliance, CHPs and
other not for profit housing providers;
i)
Promotion of the availability
of Council officers to discuss the policy in person with members of the
community, at Ashfield Service Centre on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays,
between 9am and 5pm; and
j)
correspondence from the Mayor
to unions that represent key/essential workers and artists and cultural
creators to invite their members who live and/or work in Inner West Council
to provide feedback on the policy.
4.
That Council's Your Say Inner
West (YSIW) community survey include a question identifying whether
respondents belong to a target housing cohort, such as key workers, artists
and cultural creators, low income renters, older people, or others with
demonstrated housing need.
5. That
following the conclusion of the exhibition period, the draft Inner West
Affordable Housing Policy, including Engagement Outcomes Report and any
recommended changes to the policy, be brought back to Council at the August
2026 Council meeting.
6.
That Council delegate authority to the Director Planning to
make any minor changes to the draft Affordable Housing Policy to correct any
omissions, errors or inconsistencies prior to exhibition.
Motion
Carried
For Motion: Crs
Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson,
Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Amendment
(Antoniou/Atkins)
That
the following amendments be added:
1. That
Council notes its entitlement and interest in maintaining its ability to
choose:
a)
Its preference for affordable housing contributions to be in
completed units or cash in line with future affordable housing strategies;
and
b)
To hold and manage cash contributions itself within
Council’s affordable housing fund as per existing policy in order to
direct an affordable housing strategy based on local needs.
2. That
Council notes its support for all Community Housing Providers (CHPs)
regardless of size to allow for innovation and targeted community housing
developments while avoiding the monopolisation of the CHP market in the Inner
West by Tier 1 providers.
3. That
Council reserves the right, via Voluntary Planning Agreements (VPAs) and
recommendations made through the Inner West Local Planning Panel, to request
more than a 10% affordable housing contribution if demonstrated to be
feasible in a specific development.
Motion
Lost
For Motion: Crs
Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake and Tastan
Against Motion: Crs
Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott and Smith
|
Councillor
Raciti retired from the Meeting at 8:39 pm as she declared a significant
pecuniary interest in Item 2 as she has an investment property in the Local
Government Area.
|
C0426(2) Item 2
Public Exhibition - Draft Inner West Development Control Plan
|
|
Motion: (D’Arienzo/Atkins)
1.
That Council endorse the draft
Inner West Development Control Plan and Solar Panels Policy on front roof
planes in Heritage Conservation Areas for at least a 35 day consultation
period in accordance with the requirements of Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979.
2.
That the community consultation of the draft Inner West
Development Control Plan includes:
a) A
four-week engagement period;
b) An
online Your Say Inner West (YSIW) survey;
c) Email
to YSIW subscribers;
d) Newsletter
notification;
e) Targeted information
and feedback sessions with Industry Professionals including invitations to
the local architects and planners who attended the previous industry
workshops in 2024 and 2025 and invitations to regular DA applicants;
f) An evening drop-in
community information event;
g) A workshop with Local
Democracy Group (LDG) members as part of the Building Our Community combined
LDG event;
h) A dedicated Strategic
Planning email address for submissions and enquiries;
i) A Strategic Planning
telephone hotline operating Monday to Friday, 9.00am–5.00pm, to respond
to community and applicant enquiries;
j) A submission by the
Inner West Architectural Excellence and Design Review Panel; and
k) A
‘meet the planner’ community drop-in session in each ward.
3.
That Council reflect the community's support for the
installation of solar panels on street-facing roof planes, and update the
draft Inner West Development Control Plan (IWDCP), Section 2.12 Heritage,
Control C19, page 202 accordingly.
4.
That Council hold information sessions, inviting Inner West
Community Energy, to inform residents about the Solar Panels Policy as it
applies to front roof planes in Heritage Conservation Areas.
5.
That Council trial the new Solar Panels Policy for 12 months
and subsequently receive a formal impact report evaluating its outcomes.
6.
That Council delegate
authority to the Director Planning to make any minor changes to correct any
omissions, errors or inconsistencies to the draft Inner West Development
Control Plan prior to exhibition.
7.
That Council receive a post exhibition
report on the outcomes of the consultation, including any proposed changes to
the draft Inner West Development Control Plan, for its consideration.
8.
That Council receive the post exhibition report for the
Draft Parking Strategy and Draft Parking Policy, for decision, prior to
receiving the post exhibition report for the Draft Inner West Development
Control Plan (DCP).
9.
That Council hold an online community information
session to inform residents of the proposed changes.
Motion
Carried
For Motion: Crs
Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson,
Howard, Macri, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against
Motion: Nil
Absent: Cr Raciti
Amendment
(Atkins/Barlow)
That point 2 be amended to include the below
additional points:
2.
That the community consultation on the draft Inner West
Development Control Plan (DCP) be undertaken as outlined in this report and
include:
a) A
separate letterbox notification to every dwelling in the LGA (i.e. not just
included in the Inner West News); and
b) At least one town hall meeting in every ward which can cover the
draft DCP and the draft Affordable Housing Policy. These town hall meetings
would be attended by Council staff, who could provide a briefing about the
draft DCP and the draft Affordable Housing Policy, and respond to questions
about the draft DCP and Draft Affordable Housing policy.
Motion
Lost
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins,
Barlow, Blake, Macri and Tastan
Against Motion: Crs Carlisle, Clay,
D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Scott and Smith
Absent: Cr Raciti
|
Procedural
Motion: (Howard/Blake)
That
Council enter into Confidential Session.
Motion
Carried
For Motion: Crs
Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard,
Macri, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against
Motion: Nil
Absent: Cr Raciti
Council
entered into Confidential Session at 9:10 pm
Councillor
Clay left the Meeting at 9:11 pm
Confidential
Session
That in accordance with Section 10A(1) of the Local
Government Act 1993, the following matter be considered in Closed Session
of Council for the reasons provided:
C0426(2) Item 3 Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre –
Project Update (Section
10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed,
confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting
(or proposes to conduct) business AND (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local
Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial
position of the person who supplied it AND (Section 10A(2)(d)(ii) of the Local
Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed confer a commercial advantage
on a competitor of the council.
Councillor
Clay returned to the Meeting at 9:14 pm.
resolutions passed during closed session
|
C0426(2) Item 3
Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre - Project Update
|
|
Motion: (Scott/Macri)
1.
That Council
endorses the recommendation of the negotiation team to appoint FDC Construction
(NSW) Pty Limited (“FDC”) to deliver the Leichhardt Aquatic
Centre Stage 2 Project for the Project Sum
outlined in the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre
- Project Update report, subject to the
finalisation of the contractual terms.
2.
That Council delegates authority to the
General Manager, or their nominee, to approve any variations with FDC
required for the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre – Stage 2 Upgrade
Project provided the overall project expenditure does not exceed funding
approved by Council.
3.
That Council receive an update report
on the execution of the agreement at the next Ordinary Council meeting.
4.
That Council consider the publication
of this Confidential item on Council’s website after the completion
(end of defects liability period) of the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Stage
2 Upgrade, subject to consultation with affected parties.
5.
That a report on the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre
project continue to be provided to the Major Capital Works Committee and
each Council meeting. If the report contains confidential
information for consideration or decision, a single report should be
provided in the confidential section of the agenda.
Motion
Carried
For Motion: Crs
Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson,
Howard, Macri, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Absent: Cr Raciti
|
Council
moved back into Open Session at 9:19 pm following the adoption of the
Procedural Motion below:
Procedural
Motion: (D’Arienzo/Blake)
That
Council move back into the Open Session of the Council Meeting.
Motion
Carried
For Motion: Crs
Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard,
Macri, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against
Motion: Nil
Absent: Cr Raciti
Meeting
closed at 9:20 pm.
Unconfirmed
minutes from the Extraordinary Council meeting held on 28 April 2026.