Local Traffic Committee Meeting 19 April 2022 |
Function of the Local Traffic Committee
Background
Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) is legislated as the Authority responsible for the control of traffic on all NSW Roads. The RMS has delegated certain aspects of the control of traffic on local roads to councils. To exercise this delegation, councils must establish a local traffic committee and obtain the advice of the RMS and Police. The Inner West Council Local Traffic Committee has been constituted by Council as a result of the delegation granted by the RMS pursuant to Section 50 of the Transport Administration Act 1988.
Role of the Committee
The Local Traffic Committee is primarily a technical review and advisory committee which considers the technical merits of proposals and ensures that current technical guidelines are considered. It provides recommendations to Council on traffic and parking control matters and on the provision of traffic control facilities and prescribed traffic control devices for which Council has delegated authority. These matters are dealt with under Part A of the agenda and require Council to consider exercising its delegation.
In addition to its formal role as the Local Traffic Committee, the Committee may also be requested to provide informal traffic engineering advice on traffic matters not requiring Council to exercise its delegated function at that point in time, for example, advice to Council’s Development Assessment Section on traffic generating developments. These matters are dealt with under Part C of the agenda and are for information or advice only and do not require Council to exercise its delegation.
Committee Delegations
The Local Traffic Committee has no decision-making powers. The Council must refer all traffic related matters to the Local Traffic Committee prior to exercising its delegated functions. Matters related to State Roads or functions that have not been delegated to Council must be referred directly to the RMS or relevant organisation.
The Committee provides recommendations to Council. Should Council wish to act contrary to the advice of the Committee or if that advice is not supported unanimously by the Committee members, then the Police or RMS have an opportunity to appeal to the Regional Traffic Committee.
Committee Membership & Voting
Formal voting membership comprises the following:
· one representative of Council as nominated by Council;
· one representative of the NSW Police from each Local Area Command (LAC) within the LGA, being Newtown, Marrickville, Leichhardt and Ashfield LAC’s.
· one representative from the RMS; and
· State Members of Parliament (MP) for the electorates of Summer Hill, Newtown, Heffron, Canterbury, Strathfield and Balmain or their nominees.
Where the Council area is represented by more than one MP or covered by more than one Police LAC, representatives are only permitted to vote on matters which effect their electorate or LAC.
Informal (non-voting) advisors from within Council or external authorities may also attend Committee meetings to provide expert advice.
Committee Chair
Council’s representative will chair the meetings.
Public Participation
Members of the public or other stakeholders may address the Committee on agenda items to be considered by the Committee. The format and number of presentations is at the discretion of the Chairperson and is generally limited to 3 minutes per speaker. Committee debate on agenda items is not open to the public.
Local Traffic Committee Meeting 19 April 2022 |
AGENDA |
1 Apologies
2 Disclosures of Interest
3 Confirmation of Minutes
Minutes of 21 March 2022 Local Traffic Committee Meeting 5
4 Matters Arising from Council’s Resolution of Minutes
5 Part A – Items Where Council May Exercise Its Delegated Functions
Traffic Matters
ITEM Page
LTC0422(1) Item 1 Llewellyn Street, Marrickville - Removal of Concrete Median Island (Midjuburi-Marrickville Ward/Newtown Electorate/Inner West PAC) 23
LTC0422(1) Item 2 Victoria
Street, Seaiew Street and Prospect Road, Summer Hill-External Roadwork Facilties-
Development Extension to Trinity Grammar School (Application SSD-10371)
(Djarrawunang-Ashfield Ward/Summer Hill Electorate/Ashfield
PAC) 25
LTC0422(1) Item 3 Sydney Steet Party - Lackey Street/Smith Street, Summer Hill and Norton Street, Leichhardt (Djarrawunang - Ashfield and Gulgadya -Leichhardt Wards/Summer Hill and Balmain Electorates/Burwood and Leichhardt PACs) 52
LTC0422(1) Item 4 Bland Street, Haberfield - Proposed Raised Pedestrian Crossing (Gulgadya-Leichhardt Ward/Summer Hill Electorate/Burwood PAC) 111
Parking Matters
ITEM Page
LTC0422(1) Item 5 6-8 Parsons Street, Rozelle - Lines and Signage Plan (Baludarri-Balmain/ Balmain Electorate/ Leichhardt PAC) 114
LTC0422(1) Item 6 Unnamed Lane, Leichhardt (opposite rear garage of 100 James Street) - Proposed No Parking Zone (GULGADYA-LEICHHARDT WARD/BALMAIN ELECTORATE/LEICHHARDT PAC) 118
Late Items
Nil at time of printing.
6 Part B - Items for Information Only
ITEM Page
LTC0422(1) Item 7 Frederick
Street at John Street, Ashfied-Pedestrain Fatality.
(Gulgadya-Liechhardt Ward/Boundary of Strathfield and Summer Hill
Electorates/Ashfield PAC) 120
7 Part C - Items for General Advice
Nil at the time of printing.
8 General Business
9 Close of Meeting
Local Traffic Committee Meeting 19 April 2022 |
Minutes of Local Traffic Committee Meeting
Held on 21 March 2022 at Ashfield Service Centre
Meeting commenced at 11.04AM
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY BY CHAIRPERSON
I acknowledge the Gadigal and Wangal people of the Eora nation on whose country we are meeting today, and their elders past and present.
COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT
Mayor Darcy Byrne |
Councillor – Baludarri-Balmain Ward (Chair) |
Bill Holliday |
Representative for Jamie Parker MP, Member for Balmain |
Colin Hesse |
Representative for Jenny Leong MP, Member for Newtown |
Graeme McKay |
Representative for Jo Haylen MP, Member for Summer Hill |
Maryanne Duggan |
Representative for Jason Yat-Sen Li, Member for Strathfield |
Solon Ghosh |
Transport for NSW (TfNSW) |
|
|
NON VOTING MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE |
|
|
|
Colin Jones |
Inner West Bicycle Coalition (IWBC) |
John McNeil |
Inner West Bicycle Coalition (IWBC) |
Cr Justine Langford |
Councillor – Midjuburi-Marrickville Ward (Alternate Chair) |
Manod Wickramasinghe |
IWC’s Traffic and Transport Planning Manager |
Jason Scoufis |
IWC’s Traffic and Parking Planner |
Boris Muha |
IWC’s Engineer – Traffic and Parking Services |
Christina Ip |
IWC’s Business Administration Officer |
|
|
VISITORS |
|
|
|
Peter Erling |
Item 4 – Resident |
Peter Moller |
Item 11 – Resident |
Angela White |
Item 13 – Resident |
|
|
APOLOGIES: |
|
|
|
Sgt Anthony Kenny |
NSW Police – Inner West Police Area Command |
SC Germaine Grant |
NSW Police – Burwood Police Area Command |
Sgt Gerrard Moriarty |
NSW Police – Burwood Police Area Command |
George Tsaprounis |
IWC’s Coordinator Traffic Engineering Services (South) |
DISCLOSURES OF INTERESTS:
Nil.
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
The minutes of the Local Traffic Committee meeting held on 7 February 2022 were confirmed. |
MATTERS ARISING FROM COUNCIL’S RESOLUTION OF MINUTES
The Local Traffic Committee recommendations of its meeting on 15 November 2021 and 6 December 2021 were adopted at Council’s meeting on 8 February 2022 with the following additions:
a) That a briefing of ward Councillors be held on the Rozelle North Local Area Traffic Management Study following community engagement and prior to it being reported back to the Local Traffic Committee; and
b) That a briefing for all Councillors regarding Tempe Bunnings DA and traffic control issues and commit to a date for Council to hold a community forum in person, circumstances allowing, near Tempe Primary School.
The Local Traffic Committee recommendations of its meeting on 7 February 2022 were adopted at Council’s meeting on 8 March 2022 with the following additions:
a) That a briefing of ward Councillors be held on the Dulwich Hill Station Precinct Public Domain Improvements project prior to advertising for tender; and
b) That a community meeting of local businesses and resident be held on site, before finalising the tender process.
LTC0322(1) Item 4 Gannon Lane, Tempe – Proposed new kerb extension - Design Plan 10195 (Midjuburi-Marrickville Ward / Newtown Electorate/Inner West PAC) |
SUMMARY
Council finalised a design plan for the proposed construction of a new kerb extension on the eastern corner of Gannon Lane, south of Gannon Street, Tempe. The proposed works were the subject of a Notice of Motion to rescind a previous Council decision, However, subsequent to community feedback from the recent design plan consultation it is now recommended that the proposed detailed design plan NOT be approved and that no change be made to the present parking restrictions in place in Gannon Lane, Tempe.
Officer’s Recommendation
That the detailed design plan for the proposed new kerb extension on the eastern corner of Gannon Lane, south of Gannon Street, Tempe and associated signs and line markings (as per Plan No.10195) NOT be approved.
DISCUSSION
Public speaker: Mr Peter Erling attended at 11.07am.
Mr Erling
supported the recommendation to maintain the current parking conditions. Mr
Erling also suggested installing a bollard at the rear of 767 Princes Highway
to address the
(Mr Erling left at 11.13am)
Council Officers advised that bollards are not typically installed in streets to prevent parking as they can present a vehicle hazard. Council Officers are not recommending any further measures be installed in Gannon Lane as no significant issues have been raised since the installation of the ‘No Parking’ zone on Gannon Lane south of Gannon Street. Enforcement Officers will continue to monitor for illegal parking at this location.
The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That the detailed design plan for the proposed new kerb extension on the eastern corner of Gannon Lane, south of Gannon Street, Tempe and associated signs and line markings (as per Plan No.10195) NOT be approved.
For motion: Unanimous |
LTC0322(1) Item 5 Elizabeth Street and Alt Street, Ashfield- Proposed new speed cushions and associated works at the roundabout intersection- Design Plan 10197 (Gulgadya-Leichhardt Ward/Summer Hill Electorate/Ashfield LAC) |
SUMMARY
Council has finalised design plans to construct two new speed cushions at the Alt Street approaches to the roundabout intersection of Elizabeth Street and Alt Street, Ashfield, as well as adjusting the line marking in Alt Street to better accommodate pedestrians crossing the road. Furthermore, a low profile central (mountable) median will be constructed on the Alt Street northern leg side of the intersection.
The intention of the proposal is to slow/control traffic movement and improve road safety for pedestrians and motorists at the intersection. Funding for these works has been provided under the NSW Safe Roads Program for the financial year of 2021/2022.
Officer’s Recommendation
That the detailed design plan for new speed cushions, associated construction of a low profile central mountable median, existing pram ramp modification and inclusion/modification of signs and line marking (as shown per plan 10197) be APPROVED.
DISCUSSION
The TfNSW representative stated that the ‘speed hump next 30m’ warning sign is typically used for a series of speed humps, is not required for a single speed hump, and requested the sign be removed from the proposal. The Committee members agreed to this change.
The IWBC requested that the existing bicycle symbols be retained at the roundabout or reinstated if they are impacted by the proposal. Council officers confirmed that the bicycle symbols would be retained.
The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That the detailed design plan for new speed cushions, associated construction of a low profile central mountable median, existing pram ramp modification and inclusion/modification of signs and line marking (as shown per plan 10197) be APPROVED, subject to the minor signage modifications supported by the Committee.
For motion: Unanimous |
LTC0322(1) Item 6 Holt Street, Stanmore – Pedestrian safety improvement works – raised pedestrian crossing - Design Plan 10193 (Damun - Stanmore Ward/ Newtown Electorate/ Inner West PAC) |
SUMMARY
Council has finalised a design plan for pedestrian safety improvement works in Holt Street, Stanmore near Cambridge Street south of Stanmore Rail Station. The proposed works will include upgrading the existing pedestrian zebra crossing and some reconstruction works of the adjacent stormwater drainage pits. The project is expected to improve pedestrian safety in the locality.
Officer’s Recommendation
That the detailed design plan for the raising of the existing pedestrian crossing and new adjacent kerb ramps and associated signs and line markings in Holt Street, Stanmore near Cambridge Street (as per Plan No.10193) be APPROVED.
DISCUSSION
The TfNSW representative requested that the proposed pedestrian crossing signage be moved from the pavement to the proposed island for improved visibility. The representative also asked that the proposed speed hump ahead signage be rescinded because it is not needed when a pedestrian crossing ahead sign is also proposed. The Committee members agreed to this change.
The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That the detailed design plan for the raising of the existing pedestrian crossing and new adjacent kerb ramps and associated signs and line markings in Holt Street, Stanmore near Cambridge Street (as per Plan No.10193) be APPROVED, subject to the minor signage modifications supported by the Committee.
For motion: Unanimous |
LTC0322(1)
Item 7 Thomas
and Edwin Street, Croydon - Intersection improvement works
- Design Plan 10199 |
SUMMARY
Council has finalised design plans to improve safety at the intersection of Thomas Street and Edwin Street, Croydon, by constructing new kerb blister islands to the corners of Thomas Street to facilitate safer vehicle turning movements and by bring out the STOP holding lines in Edwin Street near to front of the kerb blisters. A pram ramp (pedestrian) cross-over facility will also be provided on the western side of the intersection in Thomas Street under protection of the kerb blister islands and line marking. The intention of the proposal is to slow traffic and improve sight distances for drivers using this intersection which will improve road safety for both pedestrians and motorists.
Funding for these works has been provided under the Australian Government Blackspot Program for the financial year of 2021/2022.
Officer’s Recommendation
That the detailed design plan to construct new kerb blister islands, move the STOP holding lines out in Edwin Street, and provide a new pedestrian cross-over facility (with associated signs and markings) at the intersection of Thomas Street and Edwin Street, Croydon (as shown per attached plan 10199) be APPROVED.
DISCUSSION
The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That the detailed design plan to construct new kerb blister islands, move the STOP holding lines out in Edwin Street, and provide a new pedestrian cross-over facility (with associated signs and markings) at the intersection of Thomas Street and Edwin Street, Croydon (as shown per attached plan 10199) be APPROVED.
For motion: Unanimous |
LTC0322(1) Item 8 Church and Lucy Street, Ashfield - Intersection improvement works - Design Plan 10198 (Gulgadya-Leichhardt Ward/Strathfield Electorate/Ashfield LAC) |
SUMMARY
Council has finalised design plans to improve safety at the intersection of Church Street and Lucy Street, Ashfield, by constructing new kerb blister islands at the Church Street intersection. The proposal is expected to facilitate safer vehicle turning movements by replacing the existing Give Way control with a Stop sign and extended STOP lines. A pram ramp facility will also be provided on the western side of the intersection, under protection of the kerb blister islands and line marking. The intention of the proposal is to slow traffic and improve sight distances for drivers using this intersection which will improve road safety for both pedestrians and motorists.
Funding for these works has been provided under the Australian Government Blackspot Program for the financial year of 2021/2022.
Officer’s Recommendation
DISCUSSION
The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That the detailed design plan to construct kerb blister islands, relocate STOP lines at Lucy Street, and kerb access ramps (with associated signs and markings) at the intersection of Church Street and Lucy Street, Ashfield, (as shown per attached plan 10198) be APPROVED.
For motion: Unanimous |
LTC0322(1) Item 9 Albion Street and Young Street, Annandale - Proposed stormwater drainage upgrade (Gulgadya-Leichhardt Ward/ Balmain Electorate/ Leichhardt PAC) |
SUMMARY
Council is planning drainage improvement works at the intersection of Albion Street and Young Street, Annandale to better manage stormwater in the area by replacing and upgrading ageing stormwater infrastructure.
Officer’s Recommendation
That the attached detailed design plan (Design Plan No.10157) for the proposed stormwater drainage upgrade at the intersection of Albion Street and Young Street, Annandale be approved.
DISCUSSION
The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That the attached detailed design plan (Design Plan No.10157) for the proposed stormwater drainage upgrade at the intersection of Albion Street and Young Street, Annandale be approved.
For motion: Unanimous |
LTC0322(1) Item 10 Beattie Street, Balmain (at Darling Street) - Proposed raised pedestrian crossing (Baludarri -Balmain Ward/ Balmain Electorate/ Leichhardt PAC) |
SUMMARY
Council is planning to improve pedestrian safety in Beattie Street, Balmain at Darling Street by upgrading the existing at-grade pedestrian crossing to a raised pedestrian (wombat) crossing. The proposed works aims to improve pedestrian safety and addresses concerns about pedestrian and driver behavior in the area.
Officer’s Recommendation
That the attached detail design plan (Design Plan No.10178) for the proposed installation of a new raised pedestrian crossing on Beattie Street, Balmain (at Darling Street) be approved.
DISCUSSION
The TfNSW representative requested that the proposed speed hump ahead sign be rescinded as it is not necessary for a pedestrian crossing. The Committee members agreed to this change.
The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That the attached detail design plan (Design Plan No.10178) for the proposed installation of a new raised pedestrian crossing on Beattie Street, Balmain (at Darling Street) be approved, subject to the minor signage modifications supported by the Committee.
For motion: Unanimous |
LTC0322(1) Item 11 Trafalgar Street and Collins Street, Annandale - Proposed raised pedestrian crossings (Gulgadya - Leichhardt Ward/ Balmain Electorate/ Leichhardt PAC) |
SUMMARY
Council is planning to improve pedestrian safety at the intersection of Trafalgar Street & Collins Street, Annandale by upgrading the existing at-grade pedestrian crossings to a raised pedestrian (Wombat) crossing. The proposed works will improve pedestrian and motorist safety and addresses concerns about pedestrian and driver behaviour in the area.
Officer’s Recommendation
That the attached detailed design plan (Design Plan No.10194) for the proposed installation of the two (2) new raised pedestrian crossings on Trafalgar Street and Collins Street, Annandale be approved.
DISCUSSION
Public speaker: Mr Peter Moller attended at 11.13am.
Mr Moller did not support the proposal due to the removal of unrestricted parking and the impacts it would have on visibility and safety. Mr Moller suggested retaining the existing pedestrian crossing or improving the signage.
(Mr Moller left at 11.19am)
The TfNSW representative did not support the proposed relocation of the Trafalgar Street crossing because a queuing vehicle travelling north could prevent a vehicle on Collins Street from seeing pedestrians waiting to cross. The representative preferred the raised crossing to be at its current location on Trafalgar Street and asked that Council consider how the crossing could tie in with the bike infrastructure.
The Committee members agreed to defer the item to consider the issues raised.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That the attached detailed design plan (Design Plan No.10194) for the proposed installation of the two (2) new raised pedestrian crossings on Trafalgar Street and Collins Street, Annandale be deferred to consider the issues raised.
For motion: Unanimous |
LTC0322(1) Item 12 Annandale Street, Annandale (at Piper Street) - Proposed raised pedestrian crossing (Gulgadya - Leichhardt Ward/ Balmain Electorate/ Leichhardt PAC) |
SUMMARY
Council is planning to improve pedestrian safety in Annandale Street, Annandale near Piper Street by upgrading the existing at-grade pedestrian crossing to a raised pedestrian crossing. The proposed works will improve pedestrian and motorist safety and addresses concerns about pedestrian and driver behaviour in the area.
Officer’s Recommendation
That the attached detailed design plan (Design Plan No.10192) for the proposed installation of a new raised pedestrian crossing at Annandale Street at Piper Street, Annandale be approved.
DISCUSSION
The TfNSW representative requested that the speed hump ahead signage be removed from the proposal. The Committee members agreed to this change.
The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That the attached detailed design plan (Design Plan No.10192) for the proposed installation of a new raised pedestrian crossing at Annandale Street at Piper Street, Annandale be approved, subject to the minor signage modifications supported by the Committee.
For motion: Unanimous |
LTC0322(1) Item 13 Leichhardt West Precinct Parking Study (Gulgadya-Leichhardt Ward/Balmain Electorate/Leichhardt PAC) |
SUMMARY
This is a recommendation to endorse the findings of the Final Leichhardt West Precinct Parking Study report. Council has recently undertaken Public Exhibition of the draft Leichhardt West Precinct Parking Study through Yoursay Inner West. The draft report proposed several changes, including an expansion of the Resident Parking Scheme (RPS) as shown in Attachment 1.
The response results indicate that the community generally supported most of the proposed changes, with a majority support for the short-term proposal to expand the Resident Parking Scheme in the streets surrounding the Epicure Collection residential complex, however the majority did not support the extension of the Resident Parking Scheme into the Taverners Hill Precinct or the Leichhardt Marketplace Precinct.
After considering the Public Exhibition feedback, a review on the proposed scheme was undertaken with adjustments made to the proposed parking strategy. As the changes included both short term and long term strategies, this would require Council to implement the changes over a 5-10 year life cycle of the study.
Officer’s Recommendation
That:
1. The final Leichhardt West Precinct Parking Study be received and noted; 2. The Resident Parking Scheme (RPS) be expanded to include the streets surrounding the Epicure Residential complex in the area generally bounded by Foster Street, Regent Street, Elswick Street, Athol Street and Whiting Street with 2P 8am-6pm (Mon-Fri) Permit Holders Excepted Area L1 signposting. 3. ‘90 degree angled parking rear to kerb’ in Elswick Street North between William Street and Darley Road be approved subject to a final signposting plan being supported by Traffic Committee. 4. ‘90 degree angled parking rear to kerb’ in Edith Street between Marion Street and the southern boundary of No. 4 Edith Street be approved subject to a final signposting plan being supported by Traffic Committee. 5. Replace redundant, faded and damaged signs as identified in the signage audit. 6. Further detailed assessment be undertaken to review potential for angled parking in Elswick Street, Allen Street, Athol Street, Albert Street, Fenwick Street, Jarrett Street, Davies Street, Flood Street, Burfitt Street, Charles Street, Lords Road and Kegworth Road. 7. Further detailed parking and traffic assessment be undertaken in Myrtle Street between Ivory Street and Elswick Street, Leichhardt to provide safe condition for pedestrians. 8. Aim that the overall number of L1 resident parking permits in Leichhardt West Study Area not exceed the total L1 parking capacity within the Leichhardt West Study Area 9. Dedicate parking enforcement efforts to streets near and within 200 metres of Lambert Park to promote and enforce safe and legal parking behaviour 10. Should peak hour capacity increase on the Inner West Light Rail, monitor commuter parking at Taverners Hill, Marion and Hawthorne Light Rail Stations by undertaking parking surveys in surrounding residential streets. 11. Support be provided for the Parramatta Road Urban Transportation Strategy (PRCUTS) maximum parking rates in the future Inner West DCP.
DISCUSSION
Public speaker: Ms Angela White attended the meeting at 11.19am.
Ms White requested that the proposed RPS be extended to the intersection of Flood Street and William Street or the properties in that section be eligible to apply for permits under the proposed RPS. The request is based on concerns that residents living in the properties without off-street parking will be competing for unrestricted parking with residents of The Elswick apartment complex.
(Ms White left the meeting at 11.25am.)
Council Officers advised that consultation on an extended RPS had not been undertaken and further investigation can later be separately undertaken to determine if there was sufficient support for a minor extension.
Council Officers tabled comments from an Elswick Street resident who raised concerns that the study does not address issues related to parking overflow pressures south of Marion Street, abandoned unregistered vehicles, dangerous angled parking and pedestrian safety. Council Officers advised that if there are parking overflow issues after the RPS is implemented, extending the RPS can be investigated, issues regarding abandoned vehicles can be directed to Council’s regulatory section and pedestrian safety issues can be considered separate to the parking study.
The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That:
1. The final Leichhardt West Precinct Parking Study be received and noted; 2. The Resident Parking Scheme (RPS) be expanded to include the streets surrounding the Epicure Residential complex in the area generally bounded by Foster Street, Regent Street, Elswick Street, Athol Street and Whiting Street with 2P 8am-6pm (Mon-Fri) Permit Holders Excepted Area L1 signposting. 3. ‘90 degree angled parking rear to kerb’ in Elswick Street North between William Street and Darley Road be approved subject to a final signposting plan being supported by Traffic Committee. 4. ‘90 degree angled parking rear to kerb’ in Edith Street between Marion Street and the southern boundary of No. 4 Edith Street be approved subject to a final signposting plan being supported by Traffic Committee. 5. Replace redundant, faded and damaged signs as identified in the signage audit. 6. Further detailed assessment be undertaken to review potential for angled parking in Elswick Street, Allen Street, Athol Street, Albert Street, Fenwick Street, Jarrett Street, Davies Street, Flood Street, Burfitt Street, Charles Street, Lords Road and Kegworth Road. 7. Further detailed parking and traffic assessment be undertaken in Myrtle Street between Ivory Street and Elswick Street, Leichhardt to provide safe condition for pedestrians. 8. Aim that the overall number of L1 resident parking permits in Leichhardt West Study Area not exceed the total L1 parking capacity within the Leichhardt West Study Area 9. Dedicate parking enforcement efforts to streets near and within 200 metres of Lambert Park to promote and enforce safe and legal parking behaviour 10. Should peak hour capacity increase on the Inner West Light Rail, monitor commuter parking at Taverners Hill, Marion and Hawthorne Light Rail Stations by undertaking parking surveys in surrounding residential streets. 11. Support be provided for the Parramatta Road Urban Transportation Strategy (PRCUTS) maximum parking rates in the future Inner West DCP.
For motion: Unanimous |
LTC0322(1) Item 14 Rozelle North Precinct Parking Study (Baludarri-Balmain Ward/Balmain Electorate/Leichhardt PAC) |
SUMMARY
This is a recommendation to endorse the findings of the Final Rozelle North Precinct Parking Study report. Council has recently undertaken Public Exhibition of the draft Rozelle North Precinct Parking Study through Yoursay Inner West. The draft report proposed several changes, most notably an expansion of the existing R1and B1 Resident Parking Scheme (RPS) as shown in Attachment 1 to include additional streets within these zones.
The response results indicate that the community generally supported most of the proposed changes, with a majority support for the short-term proposal to expand the Resident Parking Scheme in the R1 and B1 Zones to generally encompass the study area. There were mixed opinions for the longer term proposal to introduce pricing on the second residential permit.
After considering the Public Exhibition feedback, a review on the proposed scheme was undertaken with adjustments made to the proposed parking strategy. As the changes included both short term and long term strategies, this would require Council to implement the changes over a 5-10 year life cycle of the study.
Officer’s Recommendation
THAT:
1. The final Rozelle North Precinct Parking Study be received and noted; 2. The Resident Parking Scheme (RPS) be expanded to include the additional streets in the R1 Zone and B1 Zone as identified in Attachment 1 with ‘2P 8am-6pm (Mon-Fri) Permit Holders Excepted Area R1’ signposting in those streets not currently signposted with an RPS in the R1 Zone and ‘2P 8am-6pm (Mon-Fri) Permit Holders Excepted Area B1’ signposting in those streets not currently signposted with an RPS in the B1 Zone. 3. The existing time limit restrictions and hours of operation of current streets in the B1 Zone that have an existing RPS will be retained, however the restriction be converted to a B1 zone. 4. Replace redundant, faded and damaged signs as identified in the signage audit. 5. Aim that the overall number of R1 and B1 resident parking permits in Leichhardt West Study Area not exceed the total R1and B1 parking capacity within the Rozelle North Study Area 6. Further investigation be carried out regarding reform to visitor parking permits in the form of scratch and display one day permits and review of personal carer permits, trade permits and support worker permits 7. Convert 8 unrestricted parking spaces on the southern side of Robert Street immediately east of Mullens Street to ‘2P 6am-4pm Mon-Fri’.
DISCUSSION
The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
THAT:
1. The final Rozelle North Precinct Parking Study be received and noted; 2. The Resident Parking Scheme (RPS) be expanded to include the additional streets in the R1 Zone and B1 Zone as identified in Attachment 1 with ‘2P 8am-6pm (Mon-Fri) Permit Holders Excepted Area R1’ signposting in those streets not currently signposted with an RPS in the R1 Zone and ‘2P 8am-6pm (Mon-Fri) Permit Holders Excepted Area B1’ signposting in those streets not currently signposted with an RPS in the B1 Zone. 3. The existing time limit restrictions and hours of operation of current streets in the B1 Zone that have an existing RPS will be retained, however the restriction be converted to a B1 zone. 4. Replace redundant, faded and damaged signs as identified in the signage audit. 5. Aim that the overall number of R1 and B1 resident parking permits in Leichhardt West Study Area not exceed the total R1and B1 parking capacity within the Rozelle North Study Area 6. Further investigation be carried out regarding reform to visitor parking permits in the form of scratch and display one day permits and review of personal carer permits, trade permits and support worker permits 7. Convert 8 unrestricted parking spaces on the southern side of Robert Street immediately east of Mullens Street to ‘2P 6am-4pm Mon-Fri’.
For motion: Unanimous |
LTC0322(1) Item 15 Traffic Committee schedule update 2022 |
SUMMARY
The proposed schedule of the Local Traffic Committee meetings has been updated for the 2022 calendar year. It is recommended that the proposed meeting schedule be received and noted.
Officer’s Recommendation
THAT the proposed updated schedule of meetings of the Local Traffic Committee for the 2022 calendar year be received and noted.
DISCUSSION
The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
THAT the proposed updated schedule of meetings of the Local Traffic Committee for the 2022 calendar year be received and noted.
For motion: Unanimous |
LTC0322(1) Item 16 Holbeach Avenue, Tempe – Temporary full road closures for MS Sydney to the Gong Bike Ride on Sunday 1 May 2022 – (Midjuburi - Marrickville Ward/Heffron Electorate/Inner West PAC) |
SUMMARY
It is recommended that the comments of the Local Traffic Committee be referred to Council’s Development Assessment Section for consideration in determining the Development Application.
Officer’s Recommendation
THAT the report be received and noted.
DISCUSSION
The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
THAT the report be received and noted.
For motion: Unanimous |
LTC0322(1) Item 17 Johnston Street, Annandale - Proposed kerb blisters (Gulgadya- Leichhardt Ward/Balmain Electorate/Leichhardt PAC) |
SUMMARY
Council has received concerns from the Annandale North Public School P&C regarding the safety of school children and parents at the signalised pedestrian crossing located on Johnston Street, north of Piper Street, Annandale. Johnston Street is a state road under the jurisdiction of TfNSW and this report outlines a proposal for kerb extensions that will be submitted for TfNSW consideration.
Officer’s Recommendation
That:
1. This report be received and noted and the proposed concept deign for two (2) kerb extensions at Johnston Street, Annandale (Option 1) be submitted for consideration by Transport for NSW; 2. Council continue advocating for pedestrian safety at this location with Transport for NSW, and request that they undertake further assessment, design and construction.
DISCUSSION
The TfNSW representative advised that they will be submitting the proposal for kerb extensions for State funding and will keep Council updated on the progress of this.
The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That:
1. This report be received and noted and the proposed concept deign for two (2) kerb extensions at Johnston Street, Annandale (Option 1) be submitted for consideration by Transport for NSW; 2. Council continue advocating for pedestrian safety at this location with Transport for NSW, and request that they undertake further assessment, design and construction.
For motion: Unanimous |
General Business
LTC0322 Item 20 30km/h speed zone trials |
The representative for the Member for Balmain asked if there were any outcomes on the trial of 30km/h speed zones in Manly and Liverpool. The TfNSW representative will seek information on this and report back to the Committee. |
LTC0322 Item 21 Safety at the intersection of Waratah Street and City West Link Haberfield |
The representative for the Member for Balmain raised concerns with right turning vehicles from Waratah Street hitting the fence at the two-stage crossing on City West Link and with the impact the G-loop has on cyclists coming out of Waratah Street. The TfNSW representative advised that a proposal to replace the pedestrian crossing with a pedestrian bridge is being investigated. It was noted that pedestrian and cyclist safety at this intersection was considered at the February 2022 Council meeting. Council Officers were asked to present a report on the issues to the Committee and Council for consideration.
|
LTC0322 Item 22 Speed limits in Summer Hill |
The IWBC representative commented on the different speed limits in Carlton Crescent, Longport Street and Railway Terrace and asked whether speed limits could be normalised in those streets. Council Officers advised that Council’s Strategic Transport Planning team are working on the “InnerWest@40” project which will consider speed limits on local, regional and state roads with the view to provide recommendations to Transport for NSW on appropriate speed limits across the LGA. |
LTC0322 Item 23 Warren Road, Marrickville one-way proposal update |
The representative for the Member for Summer Hill asked for an update on the proposed one-way in Warren Road, Marrickville. Council Officers advised that they are awaiting final approvals on the traffic signals from TfNSW and contractors have been engaged for construction.
|
LTC0322 Item 24 Road safety around schools |
The representative for the Member for Summer Hill stated that Haberfield Public School P & C conducted an operation to encourage parents to obey road rules and parking regulations, and Council Rangers were involved with monitoring and issuing fines to motorists who were parking illegally. The representative asked if similar operations could be rolled out to schools across the LGA. Council Officers advised that Council runs a behavioural and enforcement program that targets illegal parking around schools. Council Officers will circulate information on the program to Committee members.
|
Meeting closed at 12.35pm.
Local Traffic Committee Meeting 19 April 2022 |
Subject: Llewellyn Street, Marrickville - Removal of concrete median island (Midjuburi-Marrickville Ward/Newtown Electorate/Inner West PAC)
Prepared By: John Stephens - Traffic and Transport Services Manager
Authorised By: Manod Wickramasinghe - Traffic and Transport Planning Manager
SUMMARY
Council is proposing to remove the concrete median island in Llewellyn Street on the eastern approach of Black Street and extend the chevron line marking towards the intersection with Black Street, Marrickville. The proposed works will improve the right turn movement from Black Street into Llewellyn Street.
RECOMMENDATION
That the concrete median island in Llewellyn Street, immediately east of Black Street be removed and the chevron linemarking be extended approximately 0.5m towards the intersection with Black Street, Marrickville.
|
BACKGROUND AND OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
Council has received concerns about motorists attempting to turn right from Black Street into Llewellyn Street which is constrained due to vehicles parked in Llewellyn Street and the location of the existing concrete median island on the eastern approach to the intersection. Also, concern was raised about inadequate warning of approaching vehicles in Llewellyn Street. This concrete median island was installed as part of the construction of the pedestrian refuge on the western approach to the intersection.
In order to improve the right turn movement from Black Street into Llewellyn Street, it is proposed to remove the concrete median island in Llewellyn Street on the eastern approach of Black Street and the chevron linemarking be extended approximately 0.5m towards the intersection with Black Street, Marrickville. As the existing southern kerb line in Llewellyn Street was extended at the intersection of Black Street as part of the previous works, it is considered there is adequate sight distance to approaching vehicles in Llewellyn Street.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
This will be funded from the Traffic Facilities budget.
PUBLIC CONSULTATION
As there is no loss of parking associated with the proposal, no public consultation was deemed necessary.
Local Traffic Committee Meeting 19 April 2022 |
Subject: Victoria Street, Seaiew Street and Prospect
Road, Summer Hill-External roadwork facilties- Development extension to Trinity
Grammar School (Application SSD-10371)
(Djarrawunang-Ashfield Ward/Summer Hill Electorate/Ashfield
PAC)
Prepared By: Boris Muha - Engineer – Traffic and Parking Services
Authorised By: Manod Wickramasinghe - Traffic and Transport Planning Manager
SUMMARY
The Independent Planning Commission for the NSW Government Department of Planning, Industry and Environment, has approved a development expansion of the Trinity Grammar School, Summer Hill to cater for gradual increase of student numbers from 1500 to 2100 and staff from 277 to 321.
This report deals with the development proposal to provide new or up-graded surrounding external road traffic facilities to improve traffic and pedestrian safety in the area.
RECOMMENDATION
That:
APPROVAL be granted for the following proposed external road traffic facilities in association with the extended development of the Trinity Grammar School, Summer Hill, to improve traffic and pedestrian safety around the school:
a. Raise the existing (at road level) crossing in Prospect Road outside the Trinity Grammar School with associated signs and line marking as shown per plan CI-EW-400-011 in ATTACHMENT 1 subject to removal of the hump warning signage; b. Replace the existing narrow central median with a wide pedestrian refuge at the intersection of Prospect Road and Old Canterbury Road with associated physical corner adjustments and signs and line marking as shown per plan CI-EW-400-001 in ATTACHMENT 2; c. Replace (upgrade) the existing pedestrian refuge in Victoria Street, just north of Harland Street to a combined pedestrian and bicycle crossing with associated signs and line marking as shown per plan CI-EW-400-021 in ATTACHMENT 6 subject to removal of the hump warning signage; and d. Provide ‘No Stopping’ across the new driveway to the school maintenance building in Seaview Street as shown per plan CI-EW-400-041 in ATTACHMENT 9.
|
BACKGROUND
Trinity Grammar School, Summer Hill is bounded by Victoria Street to the west, Seaview Street to the north, Prospect Road to the east and Yeo Park/Old Canterbury Road to the south (see locality diagram below).
Victoria Street, Seaview Street and Prospect Road are local roads. Victoria Street measures approximately 12.8m in width kerb to kerb, Seaview Street (between Victoria Street and Prospect Road approximately 8.2m kerb to kerb, and Prospect Road approximately 10.2 m in width kerb to kerb. The three (3) local roads carry volumes in the range of 2,000-4,000 vehicles per day with higher volumes pertaining towards Prospect Road. All 3 local roads allow parking to both sides of the street and are regulated under a 50 kph speed limit. Old Canterbury Road is classified as a State Road with volumes over 20,000 vehicles per day.
It is further noted under development that (2) existing underground carparks below the school grounds will be connected and re-configurated to increase parking and improve the internal layout for dropping off and picking up students within the site. Two (2) driveways off Victoria Street serving the carparks will be better utilised and controlled in distributing traffic movement north and south in Victoria Street via an Operational Traffic Management Plan under condition of development consent.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
None
OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
Apart from the building development of the school, and in reference to the locality diagram, external road work traffic facilities are proposed at locations 1 to 3 under condition of Development Consent. Location 1 proposes the raising of an existing marked (zebra) foot-crossing, Location 2 proposes a central median wide pedestrian refuge, and location 3 is a combined raised marked foot and bicycle crossing. Location 4 deals with proposed ‘No Stopping’ across a new driveway servicing a new or extended school maintenance building to be constructed from Seaview Street. The devices at location 2 and 3 are designed to provide a link with an on-road/off-road bicycle path via Harland Street -Yeo Park- Prospect Road as identified in the Inner West Council Cycling Map and Guide.
The following is in further explanation to the devices with referral made to various attached plans and swept paths. The treatments were designed by the developer’s traffic consultants in discussion with Council’s traffic engineering staff. The design plans were subjected to a Road Safety Audit (RSA) and the consultant has incorporated the RSA feedback into the designs to mitigate against potential risks or hazards.
Location 1- Prospect Road, outside/near entrance to Trinity Grammar School.
(SEE PLAN CI-EW-400-011 in ATTACHMENT 1)
· The existing road level crossing at this location will be raised, with line marking and associated ‘No Stopping’ adjusted to conform to current TfNSW guidelines.
· The Bus Stop on the departure side of the crossing will be moved slightly forward to provide adequate sight view clearance from the rear of the bus to the crossing.
· One car space will need to be removed to the Trinity Grammar side to allow at least 20 metres of ‘No Stopping’ to the approach of the crossing in adherence to current TfNSW guidelines.
· Upgraded floodlighting will be provided to the new raised crossing.
· It is noted that the hump warning signs are not required for a raised pedestrian crossing and are recommended to be removed from the provided plan.
Location 2- Intersection of Prospect Road and Old Canterbury Road.
(SEE PLAN CI-EW-400-001 in ATTACHMENT 2 and car and bus swept path movements ATTACHMENT 3, 4 and 5)
· A wide pedestrian refuge will be constructed in lieu of a current narrow central median in Prospect Road at the intersection with Old Canterbury Road. The opening will be widened to 2.5m to accommodate the holding of both pedestrians and cyclists.
· The corners will be shaved or cut back to allow designated left and right turn out from Prospect Road. School buses will be able to turn left and right into Prospect Road from Old Canterbury. Route 406 buses will also be able to turn left into Prospect Road from Old Canterbury Road, and right out into Old Canterbury Road from Prospect Road.
· Vehicle parking is maintained at least 20 metres back in approach to the refuge as required under TFNSW guidelines.
· No loss of parking is associated with this treatment.
Location 3- Combined raised pedestrian and bicycle crossing in Victoria Street, north of Harland Street.
(SEE PLAN CI-EW-400-021 in ATTACHMENT 6 and car, garbage and Bus swept paths movements ATTACHMENT 7 and 8)
· The proposed treatment will replace a current pedestrian refuge to improve sight lines from the southern carpark driveway with south bound traffic movement centrally aligned on the roadway. The current pedestrian refuge is off set and southbound traffic is required to veer to the left and close to the eastern kerb side of Victoria Street. Sight view of pedestrians and cyclists would be improved with vehicles turning left from the carpark driveway and around a substation located on the southern corner of the driveway with the proposed treatment.
· Give-way to bicyclist signage will be placed in line with pedestrian crossing leg signs to designate priority for bicyclists with pedestrians in crossing the road.
· Traffic counts taken in April 2021 during school morning (7.30am-8.30am) and afternoon (3.15pm-4.15pm) peak periods identified hourly pedestrian (P) counts of 40 and 34 and volume (V) counts of 503 and 515 respectively. The location satisfies reduced warrant for a crossing with pedestrians being predominately school children, i.e. (P) requires to be equal or over 30 and (V) is equal or over 200 in any two hourly periods of the day.
· No kerb island is placed to the departure southbound side of the crossing, with the likelihood of school buses/garbage trucks needing to veer towards the eastern kerb side of Victoria Street to right turn into Harland Street. See bus and garbage truck swept path movements Attachments 6 and 7.
· Bicycle signs and line making are identified with this treatment to guide cyclists to use the footpath to cross over from Harland Street onto Yeo Park and visa-versa.
· Any parking in the area is well clear of the crossing. No loss of parking is associated with this treatment.
· Floodlighting will be provided to the new crossing.
· It should also be noted that vehicles will only turn left out and left in from the southern driveway and not turn right in to avoid confliction and queuing of vehicles back over the crossing and Harland Street. Vehicles do not currently turn right out, however under the DA, service vehicles shall only be permitted to turn right out outside of the peak times.
· It is noted that the hump warning signs are not required for a raised pedestrian crossing and are recommended to be removed from the provided plan.
Location 4- Proposed ‘No Stopping’ across new driveway to Maintenance building off Seaview Street.
(SEE PLAN CI-EW-400-041 in ATTACHMENT 9)
· ‘No Stopping’ is proposed across a new widened maintenance building driveway from Seaview Street to control parking either side of the driveway and ensure that proper adequate service vehicle access and unobstructed sight view is provided from the driveway.
· Resident properties along the southern side of Seaview Street are owned by the school, and all properties (No’s 46-52) except the corner property (No.54) to Victoria Street, will be demolished to construct the new building.
· All driveways servicing the above demolished properties will be removed to provide for on-street parking.
· (1) new parking space will be provided under this treatment.
GENERAL NOTE: Signposting and line marking to direct bicyclists to use the footpath to cross over Victoria Street from Harland Street and Yeo Park and visa-versa is only applied to the crossing in location 3. Formalising the continuation of the bicycle path to Prospect Road falls outside of the scope of these development works and is not identified under condition of development consent. Council will pursue separately to look at formalising this connection via signs and line marking in accordance with the NSW Bicycle Guidelines.
CONSULTATION
The developer’s traffic consultant (Street Level Strategies) was guided and directed by Council’s Traffic Engineering staff to consult with the affected residents in the vicinity of the proposed treatments -See consultation map areas ATTACHMENT 10.
A community consultation report has been provided as shown in ATTACHMENT 11. The report shows samples of (2) consultation letters, one identifying the proposed traffic facilities at locations 1 to 3 which was issued to the Prospect Road and Victoria Street residents, and a separate letter being issued to the Seaview Street and Victoria Street corner residents on the proposed installation of ‘No Stopping’ across the driveway in Seaview Street- Location 4.
23 letters were distributed to occupants and owners (20) properties in Prospect Road and Victoria Street, and 12 letters (7 properties) in Seaview/Victoria Streets. Only (2) responses were received raising concern or questioning the need of the proposed devices in location 1 to 3. No response was received to the proposed ‘No Stopping’ across the driveway in Seaview Street- Location 4.
The concerns/queries are summarised below:
Ø The proposed intersection treatment at Prospect Road and Old Canterbury being wide enough to accommodate two vehicles side by side exiting out of Prospect Road.
Ø Query on Bus turning movements being difficult at the intersection of Old Canterbury Road and Prospect Road.
Ø Noise impact with the raised crossing in Prospect Road.
Ø Query on the need to upgrade the pedestrian refuge to a crossing in Victoria Street as the refuge provides a traffic calming effect.
Ø Query as to why a crossing cycle facility being provided in Victoria Street
Ø Proposed works not addressing concerns to vehicle access to and from the car park.
Ø Quantity of signage being proposed.
These comments are tabled in the report (ATTACHMENT 11) and have been appropriately addressed under the ‘Consultant response’.
The consultant did not identify in the consultation letter to upgrade floodlighting to the crossing in Prospect Road and will further liaise with the few residents adjacent to the crossing in the need to floodlight the crossing prior to any works being undertaken.
CONCLUSION
In view of the above, it is recommended that approval be granted for the proposed external road traffic facilities in association with the extended development of the Trinity Grammar School, Summer Hill, to improve traffic and pedestrian safety around the school.
1.⇩ |
Plan CI-EW-400-011-Proposed raised pedestrain crossing in Prospect Road. |
2.⇩ |
Plan CI-EW-400-001-Proposed wide pedestrain refuge at the intresection of Prospect Road and Old Canterbury Road. |
3.⇩ |
Car swept path movements (out of Prospect Road only) at the intersection of Propect Road and Old Canterbury Road. |
4.⇩ |
Car swept path movements (in and out of Prospect Road) at the interesection of Prospect Road and Old Canterbury Road. |
5.⇩ |
Bus swept path movements at intersection of Prospect Road and Old Canterbury Road. |
6.⇩ |
Plan CI-EW-400-021- Proposed combined pedestrain and bicycle crossing in Victoria Street, just north of Harland Street. |
7.⇩ |
Car and Garbage truck swept path movements in Victoria Street, just north of Harland Street. |
8.⇩ |
Bus swept path movement in Victoria Street, just north of Harland Street. |
9.⇩ |
Plan CI-EW-400-041-Proposed 'No Stopping' across the new maintenance building driveway in Seaview Street. |
10.⇩ |
Consultation letter area distribution areas. |
11.⇩ |
Community consultation report. |
Local Traffic Committee Meeting 19 April 2022 |
Subject: Sydney Steet Party - Lackey Street/Smith Street, Summer Hill and Norton Street, Leichhardt (Djarrawunang - Ashfield and Gulgadya -Leichhardt Wards/Summer Hill and Balmain Electorates/Burwood and Leichhardt PACs)
Prepared By: Vinoth Srinivasan - Engineer - Traffic and Parking Services
Authorised By: Manod Wickramasinghe - Traffic and Transport Planning Manager
SUMMARY
The proposed events, Sydney Street Parties – Summer Hill and Leichhardt, are street parties’ that form part of The Sydney Street Party Series that will deliver on the NSW Government’s commitment to CBDs revitalisation as outlined in the COVID 19 Economic Recovery Strategy.
To facilitate the Sydney Street Party – Summer Hill, it is proposed to undertake a full road closure of Lackey Street (between Carlton Crescent and Smith Street) and Smith Street (Hardie Avenue and Nowranie Street), Summer Hill from 8.00am to 10.00pm on Saturday, 11 June 2022.
To facilitate the Sydney Street Party – Leichhardt, it is proposed to implement a full road closure of Norton Street, between Allen Street and Marion Street, Leichhardt from 8.00am to 10.00pm on Sunday, 12 June 2022.
RECOMMENDATION
That:
1. The proposed temporary road closure of Lackey Street (between Carlton Crescent and Smith Street) and Smith Street (between Hardie Avenue and Nowranie Street), from 8.00am and 10.00pm on Saturday, 11 June 2022 for the Sydney Street Party –Summer Hill be supported, subject to the event organiser seeking consent from TfNSW and Transit Systems; 2. The proposed temporary road closure of Norton Street, Leichhardt (between Allen Street and Marion Street) from 8.00am to 10.00pm on Sunday 12 June 2022 Sydney Street Party – Leichhardt be supported, subject to the event organiser seeking consent from TfNSW and Transit Systems; 3. All affected residents and businesses, including the NSW Police Local Area Commander, Fire & Rescue NSW and the NSW Ambulance Services be notified in writing, by the event organiser, of the proposed temporary road closures at least 2 weeks in advance of the closure with the applicant making reasonable provision for stakeholders; 4. The occupation of the road carriageway must not occur until the road has been physically closed, and 5. A 4 metre wide emergency service access must be maintained through the closed road areas during the course of the event; 6. The revised TMP’s and TGS’s for both events be adhered to.
|
BACKGROUND & OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
A request for approval to conduct two Sydney Street Parties on Saturday, 11 June 2022 and Sunday, 12 June 2022 between 8:00am and 10:00pm has been received from the organiser of the event, Investment NSW.
In accordance with the RMS “Guide to Traffic and Transport Management for Special Events V3.4 August 2006”, and based on information supplied by the organiser, the event is classified as a Special Event Class 2.
The organiser has submitted revised Traffic Management Plan (TMP) and Traffic Guidance Scheme (TGS) to Transport for New South Wales (TfNSW) for consideration and approval for both Sydney Street Parties (Attachment 1, 2, 3 and 4).
Sydney Street Party – Summer Hill
This event involves the temporary full closure of Lackey Street and Smith Street (between Hardie Street and Nowranie Street). These street closure arrangements as shown in the TGS have similarly been approved in the past for special (food festival) events.
Traffic can detour via the surrounding streets, and access to/from the Summer Hill carpark is only maintained from Smith Street. No bus services operate in the area.
As it has been the case in prior closures or as considered under this closure, the following is required and has been included under the revised TMP:
· 3 restricted time parking spaces on the western side of Hardie Avenue, just north of Smith Street, be made unavailable, to assist in 2-way traffic to and from the carpark only from Smith Street. This shall be included in the notification to the residents and businesses in communication of the event.
· Parking in Morris Street (both sides) between Smith Street and 1A Morris Street [first driveway south of Smith Street] be made unavailable to allow turnaround at the point of closure of Smith Street and Morris Street.
· An additional traffic controller is to be positioned at the intersection of Smith Street and Moonbie Street to assist and direct traffic away if the car park is full.
· Appropriate VMS boards and advisory signage be placed at appropriate locations prior to the event to forewarn motorists of the upcoming event, and particularly advise of the carpark entry only from Smith Street.
Special Event Clearways will apply on Saturday 11th June 2022 from 8.00am to 8.00pm at:
· Lackey Street (both sides) between Carlton Crescent and Smith Street
· Smith Street between Hardie Avenue and Nowranie Street
· 3 x spaces on Hardie Avenue (western side), north of Smith Street
· Morris Street (both sides) between Smith Street and 1A Morris Street [first driveway south of Smith Street]
· A small section of the Hardie Avenue car park (eastern side, parallel with Lackey Street) – approx. 10 parking spaces Special event clearways will be implemented to occupy these spaces for this event.
Special event clearway signage will be installed by the Transport for NSW (TfNSW) for this event 14 days prior. A tow truck will be provided on event day and managed by TfNSW.
Sydney Street Party – Leichhardt
· Norton Street between Allen Street and Macauley Street
· Macauley Street between Cromwell Street and Norton Street
· Carlisle Street between Cromwell Street and Norton Street
· Short Street between Norton Street and Balmain Road
· Marlborough Street between Cromwell Street and Norton Street
· Wetherill Street between Norton Street and Balmain Road
Lou Street between Marlborough Street and Allen Street will become one-way northbound only.
Special event clearways will be implemented on both sides of Norton Street between Macauley Street and Marion Street for this event. Special event clearway signage will be installed by the TfNSW for this event 14 days prior. A tow truck will be provided on event day and managed by TfNSW.
For the duration of the road closures, it is recommended that bus services be diverted down Allen Street, Flood Street and Marion Street, similar to other Norton Street events in previous years.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Nil.
PUBLIC CONSULTATION
The proposed temporary full road closures are currently advertised on Council’s website for a period of 28 days in accordance with the Roads Act 1993.
The event organiser is to notify all affected businesses, residents and other occupants of the road closures, activities, parking changes and changes to public transport arrangements. The notification will be distributed at least two weeks prior to the commencement of the event.
1.⇩ |
Sydney Street Party - Summer Hill 2022 TMP |
2.⇩ |
Sydney Street Party - Summer Hill 2022 - TGS |
3.⇩ |
Sydney Street Party - Leichhardt 2022 - TMP |
4.⇩ |
Sydney Street Party - Leichhardt 2022 - TGS |
Local Traffic Committee Meeting 19 April 2022 |
Subject: Bland Street, Haberfield - Proposed Raised Pedestrian Crossing (Gulgadya-Leichhardt Ward/Summer Hill Electorate/Burwood PAC)
Prepared By: Sunny Jo - Coordinator Traffic Engineering Services (North)
Authorised By: Manod Wickramasinghe - Traffic and Transport Planning Manager
SUMMARY
An amended design plan is proposed for the pedestrian crossing upgrade in Bland Street, Haberfield near Denman Avenue. The change include adjustments to the height of the proposed device and ramp grade to address the noise issues raised by nearby residents.
RECOMMENDATION
That the attached detailed design plan (Design Plan No.10181-A) for the proposed installation of a new raised pedestrian crossing at Bland Street, Haberfield near Denman Avenue be approved. |
BACKGROUND
The Traffic Committee on 15 November 2021 approved the detailed design of the raised pedestrian crossing at Bland Street, Haberfield near Denman Avenue. The design shown in Attachment 1 outlines the proposed works and includes the following treatments:
- Installing new Raised Pedestrian Crossing.
- Installing associated pavement line marking and signage as required;
- Constructing new concrete footpath leads on both sides of the proposed pedestrian crossing;
- Implementing new “No Stopping” zones and signage, without impacting the existing car parking spaces;
PUBLIC CONSULTATION
During October/November 2021, letters were distributed to six (6) surrounding properties including Haberfield Public School. The original report to the Traffic Committee did not include any resident submission(s) however an objection was received which was not included in the report. The details and officer’s response are outlined in the table below:
Resident’s Comments |
Officer’s response |
The crossing is approximately 20 metres from the
Bland/Denman intersection. Unless stopping at the crossing, vehicles are
accelerating at this point. As residents living within 30 metres of the
crossing, we have a concern with noise from vehicles passing a raised
crossing.
|
As this facility is installed in close proximity to an existing Stop sign, the engine noise is expected to be similar to the existing situation.
To address the noise issues, the following design elements have been included in the latest plan: - Height of flat top section is proposed to be reduced from 100mm to 75mm - A 0.4m length flat ‘apron’ section in concrete prior to the ramps commencing. The design of the ramps and apron will be a single piece of concrete so that the asphalt does not subside at the ramp transition over time.
It should be noted that the above changes may encourage higher passing speed of vehicles compared to a conventional design.
|
Adding to this issue is the number of vehicles over 3 tonnes illegally using Bland Street as a through street. I have yet to see a fine issued.
|
The enforcement of 3t load limit in Bland Street is a matter for the NSW Police. Trucks servicing an address within Bland Street with no other alternative route are exempt from the load limit.
|
Council considered a modified design that had the ramps at a 1.8m length and 75mm height to address the noise issues, however, this is below the minimum 1:20 ramp grade permissible for a raised pedestrian crossing and as a result, ramps were adjusted at a 1.5m length at 75mm height.
Additional minor changes to the design are shown in the revision cloud in the attached plan which includes:
- Removal of ‘hump ahead’ symbolic signs on each approach
- Removal of ‘hump’ symbolic signs at the crossing
- Removal of existing stop (TF) linemarking on each approach
It is also noted that in 2020, Council has examined numerous school zones within the State electorate of Summer Hill, as raised by the Summer Hill NSW School Safety Survey organized by the Summer Hill MP. One of the issues identified at Haberfield Public School was a need to lower vehicle speeds in Bland Street which will be addressed by this design.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Funding of $40,000 has been allocated to this project for construction in the 2021/2022 Capital Works Program.
1.⇩ |
Bland Street, Haberfield Design Plan 10181-A |
Local Traffic Committee Meeting 19 April 2022 |
Subject: 6-8 Parsons Street, Rozelle - Lines and Signage Plan (Baludarri-Balmain/ Balmain Electorate/ Leichhardt PAC)
Prepared By: Felicia Lau - Engineer - Traffic and Parking Services
Authorised By: Manod Wickramasinghe - Traffic and Transport Planning Manager
SUMMARY
The developer for 6-8 Parsons Street, Rozelle (Bunnings) has submitted a linemarking and signage plan to be approved as part of the development consent.
RECOMMENDATION
That:
1. A ‘No Stopping’ zone to be installed across the development’s driveway (loading dock and car park) extending 5.4m east of the car park driveway for driver visibility entering/exiting the development as per attached plans. 2. Retain a 10.8m section of unrestricted parking, and 10m statutory ‘No Stopping’ zone as per existing in Parsons Street between the development driveway and Mullens Street intersection. 3. The ‘No Stopping’ zone along the Mullens Street boundary of No.6-8 Parsons Street, Rozelle be formalised by signposting. 4. Relocate an existing ‘No Stopping 3pm-7pm Mon-Fri (left arrow)’ sign (currently located approximately 17m east of No.28 Robert Street) to the west by approximately 2m to allow tree planting pit.
|
BACKGROUND & OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
The development (Bunnings) in 6-8 Parsons Street, Rozelle was approved by the Land and Environment Court New South Wales on 15th November 2019 subject to development conditions. Bunnings have commenced construction and as part of a development conditions, all new and altered signage must be approved by the Local Traffic Committee and Council prior to installation.
The proposed changes to signage are outlined below:
· A ‘No Stopping’ zone to be installed across the development’s driveways (loading dock and car park) extending 5.4m east of the car park driveway for driver visibility entering/ exiting the development.
· Retain a 10.9m section of unrestricted parking, and 10m statutory ‘No Stopping’ zone as per existing in Parsons Street between the development driveway and Mullens Street intersection.
· The ‘No Stopping’ zone along the Mullens Street boundary of No.6-8 Parsons Street, Rozelle be formalised by signposting.
· Relocate an existing ‘No Stopping 3pm-7pm Mon-Fri (left arrow)’ sign (currently located approximately 17m east of No.28 Robert Street) to the west by approximately 2m to allow tree planting pit.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The cost associated with signage and linemarking will be covered by the applicant for the 6-8 Parsons Street, Rozelle development.
CONSULTATION
Resident and businesses along Parsons Street and Robert Street (between Crescent Street and Mullens Street) have been notified of the proposed linemarking and signage plans. At the time of this report no submissions have been received.
1.⇩ |
Linemarking and Signage Plan - Parsons Street |
2.⇩ |
Linemarking and Signage Plan (Robert & Mullens Street) |
Local Traffic Committee Meeting 19 April 2022 |
Subject: Unnamed Lane, Leichhardt (opposite rear garage of 100 James Street) - Proposed No Parking Zone (GULGADYA-LEICHHARDT WARD/BALMAIN ELECTORATE/LEICHHARDT PAC)
Prepared By: David Yu - Engineer - Traffic and Parking Services
Authorised By: Sunny Jo - Coordinator Traffic Engineering Services (North)
SUMMARY
Council has received concerns regarding parked vehicles obstructing access to off-street parking in the unnamed lane (rear of No. 100 James Street), Leichhardt.
RECOMMENDATION
That a 3.7m ‘No Parking’ zone be installed on the western side of Unnamed Lane between two driveways and opposite rear boundary of No. 100 James Street, Leichhardt.
|
BACKGROUND
Council received a concern from a resident of James Street, Leichhardt regarding vehicles parking on the western side of the unnamed lane between James Street and Francis Street, Leichhardt and subsequently obstructing rear driveway access for property No. 100 James Street.
The subject lane is approximately 4.9m wide. There is an existing ‘No Parking’ zone on the western side of Unnamed Lane that is located to the south of the proposed restriction (at the rear of No. 94 James Street).
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Nil.
OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
It is proposed to signpost the western side of Unnamed Lane opposite No. 100 James Street as a ‘No Parking’ zone. The proposal is shown on the following plan.
The proposal is not expected to result in any loss of legal on-street parking space.
PUBLIC CONSULTATION
A letter outlining the above proposal was mailed out to the affected properties (21 properties) in James and Francis Street, Leichhardt.
One (1) response was received, in objection to the proposal. The residents main concern was that the proposal should be considered for the whole laneway and not just for a single property.
Council only investigates No Parking restrictions for the requested location, as different properties may have different characteristics such as garage widths, car sizes and on-street parking arrangements.
Local Traffic Committee Meeting 19 April 2022 |
Subject: Frederick Street at John Street,
Ashfied-Pedestrain fatality.
(Gulgadya-Liechhardt Ward/Boundary of Strathfield and Summer Hill
Electorates/Ashfield PAC)
Prepared By: Boris Muha - Engineer – Traffic and Parking Services
Authorised By: Manod Wickramasinghe - Traffic and Transport Planning Manager
SUMMARY
Council has received numerous community concerns and a petition with 1605 signatures requesting that traffic signals be installed at the intersection of Frederick Street and John Street, Ashfield, following a pedestrian fatality that occurred on Sunday 13 March 2022 at an existing marked foot-crossing in Frederick Street just west of the above intersection.
Council officers met with Transport for NSW (TfNSW) officers on site to discuss various interim measures to improve traffic and pedestrian safety in the area and Council officers requested that the TfNSW representative consider providing traffic signals at the intersection of Frederick Street and John Street, Ashfield.
Frederick Street is a State Road and any traffic facilities along the State Road, and the general installation or maintenance/operation of signals come under the care, control, and responsibility of the TfNSW. Any changes on a State Road are decided and approved by the TfNSW.
The report below provides background information in relation to this site as well as discussions had between Council and the TfNSW regarding remedial measures to improve traffic and pedestrian safety in the area. It is recommended that it be received and noted.
RECOMMENDATION
That the report be received and noted. |
BACKGROUND
Frederick Street is a classified as a State Road and carries over 25,000 vehicles per day. It is a bus route and forms part of the Heavy Vehicle Network.
Frederick Street measures approximately 10 metres kerb to kerb in the vicinity of the intersection of Frederick Street and John Street. No vehicles park either side of Frederick Street in the vicinity of the intersection. The speed limit in Frederick Street is 60km/h. John Street serves as a local cross-street connection with Frederick Street. It carries a lower traffic volume of around 3000 vehicle per day with a speed limit of 50kph. John Street measures approximately 10m kerb to kerb, permits parking on both sides of the street and is regulated under ‘STOP’ control at its intersection with Frederick Street.
The current marked foot-crossing in Frederick Street (as shown in the diagram below) was relocated some 20 metres west in Frederick Street from its original location on the western corner of the intersection of Frederick Street and John Street in May-July 2018 by the TfNSW (then RMS). This was actioned following community complaints and through discussions with Council and Police as a result of various pedestrian/traffic incidences occurring at the intersection. The crossing was moved to avoid confliction with the traffic movement around the intersection, and to separate and focus on the view of the crossing away from the intersection. It was also narrowed with kerb blisters to allow a safe one lane movement of traffic in each direction through the crossing. A wide central median was also constructed in Frederick Steet, east of John Street to control traffic movement around the curve to the east side of the intersection and in advance approach to the crossing. An in-lane Bus Stop also exists to the east of the intersection on approach to the intersection. The TfNSW representative advised that a number of different treatments were proposed at the time the crossing was shifted further south, with this current treatment (as implemented in 2018) being the most feasible solution.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
None
OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
Council officers met with a TfNSW representative on site on the 24 March 2022 to gauge existing conditions at the crossing in Frederick Street and intersection of Frederick Street and John Street. Council officers were of the view that the most appropriate solution to address road safety at both the pedestrian crossing and the priority-controlled Frederick Street/John Street intersection is for TfNSW to install traffic signals at the intersection.
However, noting that if signals are considered and approved by the TfNSW, that funding would need to be obtained and resourcing would need to be programed, and that the work may take at least 2-3 years to initiate.
In the meantime, it was suggested [by council officers] that TfNSW consider the following mitigative measures be carried out in the interim.
· Install supplementary pedestrian crossing warning signs (W6-2) facing the pedestrian crossing in both directions in Frederick Street. Currently there are advance pedestrian warning signs to the left- hand sides on the approach to the crossing. By supplementing further signage to the right-hand sides on approach to the crossing, this will further enhance driver awareness of the crossing.
· Install pedestrian crossing warning signs (W6-2) in John Street on both approaches to Frederick Street. These warning signs have arrows left or right to alert drivers in the side street of a crossing around the corner of an intersection.
· Remark the zebra crossing bars, zig zag markings and double barrier (BB) centre lines and replace reflective raised pavement markers (RPMs) to all line marking.
· Relocate 60 km/h speed limit sign facing southbound traffic on approach to crossing. Current speed limit signage is located near the intersection. By relocating the signage away from the intersection, this would avoid drivers to believing that they must enter the intersection at 60kph.
· Extend the concrete kerb (island) blisters on southbound approach and northbound departure side of crossing in Frederick Street to further improve traffic control around the intersection and crossing.
· Remark chevron markings at the median island in Frederick Street east of John Street.
· Remark the face and top of the concrete kerb island blisters in recognition of the crossing and protective kerb island blisters
· Investigate whether the existing 60km/h speed limit is appropriate and could be reduced to 50 km/h given adjacent land uses and (2) zebra marked foot crossings in this section of the road.
· Slightly adjust the stop holding line in John Street (southern leg) by relocating it back from the south- western corner of intersection with Frederick Street. This may provide clearer sight lines between southbound traffic approaching the crossing and pedestrians about to enter crossing.
· Banning some of the right turn movements at the John Street/Frederick Street to reduce vehicular-vehicular conflict. These ban movements might still be incorporated into the design of any approved signals for the efficient running of the intersection.
· Provide flashing lights to crossing (e.g. Shaftsbury Road, Burwood).
These proposed interim measures and ultimate inclusion of signals would need to be investigated further by the TfNSW and it would be requested that TfNSW inform Council of its decision and actions to improving pedestrian and traffic safety in the area.
PUBLIC CONSULTATION
Not required.
CONCLUSION
It is recommended that the members note the above interim measures for TfNSW to consider for improved pedestrian and traffic safety at the crossing in Frederick Street and its intersection with John Street, Ashfield. TfNSW in turn also consider the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Frederick Street and John Street and that it would be requested to inform Council on its decision and action to improving pedestrian and traffic safety in the area.