|
Council Meeting 10 November 2020
|
Live Streaming of Council Meeting
In the spirit of open, accessible and transparent government, this meeting of the Inner West Council is being streamed live on Council’s website. By speaking at a Council meeting, members of the public agree to being recorded and must ensure their speech to the Council is respectful and use appropriate language. A person who uses defamatory, discriminatory or offensive language may be exposed to liability for which Council takes no responsibility. Any part of this meeting that is held in closed session will not be recorded
Pre-Registration to Speak at Council Meetings
Speaking at a Council Meeting is conducted through an online software application called Zoom. Members of the public must register by 2pm of the day of the Meeting to speak at Council Meetings. If you wish to register to speak please fill in a Register to Speak Form, available from the Inner West Council website, including:
Are there any rules for speaking at a Council Meeting?
The following rules apply when addressing a Council meeting:
What happens after I submit the form?
You will be contacted by Governance Staff and provided with a link to the online meeting. Your request will then be added to a list that is shown to the Chairperson on the night of the meeting. Public speakers will be allowed into the Meeting when it is their time to speak.
Where Items are deferred, Council reserves the right to defer speakers until that Item is heard on the next occasion.
|
Council Meeting 10 November 2020 |
PRECIS |
1 Acknowledgement of Country
2 Apologies
3 Notice of Webcasting
4 Disclosures
of Interest (Section 451 of the Local Government Act
and Council’s Code of Conduct)
5 Moment of Quiet Contemplation
6 Confirmation of Minutes Page
Minutes of 13 October 2020 Extraordinary Council Meeting 5
Minutes of 27 October 2020 Council Meeting 7
7 Public Forum – Hearing from All Registered Speakers
8 Condolence Motions
Nil at the time of printing.
9 Mayoral Minutes
Nil at the time of printing.
10 Reports with Strategic Implications
Nil at the time of printing.
11 Reports for Council Decision
ITEM Page
C1120(1) Item 1 Harmonisation of Rates 19
C1120(1) Item 2 Reprioritisation of Park Plans of Management-Alignment with the Land & Property Strategy (LAPS) 30
C1120(1) Item 3 Adoption Leichhardt Park Plan of Management 36
C1120(1) Item 4 Post Exhibition - Heritage Listing - 389 Illawarra Road, Marrickville 38
12 Reports for Noting
ITEM Page
C1120(1) Item 5 WestConnex Independent Property Impact Assessment Panel 52
13 Rescission Motions
ITEM Page
C1120(1) Item 6 Notice of Motion to Rescind: Adoption of Tempe Reserve Plan of Management - 27 October 2020 53
14 Notices of Motion
ITEM Page
C1120(1) Item 7 Notice of Motion: Completion of works - Elizabeth Street Ashfield 'Pocket Park' 54
C1120(1) Item 8 Notice of Motion: Cleaning Regime Town Centres 56
C1120(1) Item 9 Notice of Motion: Fees to Pool 60
C1120(1) Item 10 Notice of Motion: Final Pool Costs - Ashfield Pool 62
C1120(1) Item 11 Notice of Motion: Damage to Council Property 63
C1120(1) Item 12 Notice of Motion: Synthetic Turf and Arlington Oval 66
15 Reports with Confidential Information
Reports appearing in this section of the Business Paper contain confidential information in attachments.
The confidential information has been circulated separately.
ITEM Page
C1120(1) Item 13 Tender Recommendation-IWC Parramatta Rd Urban Amenity Improvement - Construction - T07-20 67
|
Council Meeting 10 November 2020
|
Minutes of Extraordinary Council Meeting held remotely on 13 October 2020
Meeting commenced at 6.00pm
Present: |
|
Darcy Byrne Victor Macri Mark Drury Lucille McKenna OAM Colin Hesse Sam Iskandar Tom Kiat Pauline Lockie Vittoria Raciti Louise Steer Anna York Ross Nassif |
Mayor Deputy Mayor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Local Government NSW |
DISCLOSURES OF INTERESTS: Nil
Motion: (Byrne/Macri)
THAT Council enter into Confidential session.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Byrne, Drury, Hesse, Kiat, Iskandar, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Raciti, Steer and York
Against Motion: Nil
That in accordance with Section 10A(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, the following matter be considered in Closed Session of Council for the reasons provided:
C1020(1) Item 1 Confidential Staff Matter (Section 10A(2)(a) and s10A(2)(g)) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, involve personnel matters concerning an individual other than a councillor and will also involve receipt of legal advice that would be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege.
ADJOURNMENT
7.06pm - The Mayor, Clr Byrne adjourned the meeting to resume at 7:00pm on Monday, 19 October 2020 remotely.
RESUMPTION
The Mayor, Clr Byrne resumed the meeting at 7:01pm on Monday, 19 October 2020 and the following Councillors, Staff and other attendees were present:
Darcy Byrne Victor Macri Mark Drury Lucille McKenna OAM Colin Hesse Tom Kiat Pauline Lockie Vittoria Raciti Louise Steer Anna York Ross Nassif Megan Jenkins |
Mayor Deputy Mayor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor (7.30pm) Councillor Councillor Councillor Local Government NSW Senior Lawyer (8.17pm) |
Motion: (Byrne/Macri)
THAT Council move back into the Open Session of the Council Meeting.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Byrne, Drury, Hesse, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Raciti, Steer and York
Against Motion: Nil
Meeting closed at 8.19 pm.
Minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting held remotely and livestreamed on Council’s website on 27 October 2020
Meeting commenced at 6.30pm
Present: |
|
Darcy Byrne Victor Macri Marghanita Da Cruz Mark Drury Lucille McKenna OAM Colin Hesse Sam Iskandar Tom Kiat Pauline Lockie Julie Passas Vittoria Raciti John Stamolis Louise Steer Elizabeth Richardson |
Mayor Deputy Mayor Councillor Councillor (6.33pm) Councillor (6.31pm) Councillor Councillor Councillor (6.33pm) Councillor Councillor Councillor (6.32pm) Councillor Councillor Acting Chief Executive Officer |
Cathy Edwards-Davis |
Director Infrastructure |
Katherine Paixao |
Acting Governance Manager |
Carmelina Giannini Caroline Karakatsanis Rochele Antolin |
Governance Support Officer Audit Office NSW Audit Office NSW |
APOLOGIES:
Motion: (Byrne/Drury)
THAT apologies from Councillor York be accepted.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Hesse, Iskandar, Lockie, Macri, Passas, Stamolis and Steer
Against Motion: Nil
Councillor McKenna OAM entered the Meeting at 6:31 pm.
Councillor Raciti entered the Meeting at 6:32 pm.
DISCLOSURES OF INTERESTS:
Clr Lockie declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 11 Notice of Motion: Parking on the Princes Highway as one of the businesses affected is her family vet and they originally approached her for advice on the issue through Council before she referred the business to Clr Macri.
Motion: (Steer/Da Cruz)
THAT Council note the disclosures of interest.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Hesse, Iskandar, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer
Against Motion: Nil
Councillors Drury and Kiat entered the Meeting at 6:33 pm.
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
Motion: (Stamolis/Hesse) THAT the Minutes of the Council Meeting held on Tuesday, 13 October 2020 and Extraordinary Council Meeting held on Tuesday, 13 October 2020 be confirmed as a correct record. Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer Against Motion: Nil |
ADJOURNMENT
6.40pm - The Mayor, Clr Byrne adjourned the meeting for a short recess.
6.42pm– The Mayor, Clr Byrne resumed the meeting.
Confidential Session
Motion: (Byrne/Macri)
THAT Council enter into Confidential session.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer
Against Motion: Nil
That in accordance with Section 10A(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, the following matter be considered in Closed Session of Council for the reasons provided:
C1020(2) Item 21 Mayoral Minute: Appointment of Interim CEO contains personnel matters concerning particular individuals (other than councillors) (Section 10A(2)(a) of the Local Government Act 1993).
Motion: Byrne/Hesse
THAT Council move back into the Open Session of the Council Meeting.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer
Against Motion: Nil
Reports with Confidential Information
Motion: (Byrne/Macri)
THAT Council:
1. Appoints Brian Barrett as Acting General Manager of Inner West Council effective from the date on which a contract of employment has been signed by Brian Barrett and the Mayor;
2. Authorises the Mayor to negotiate and sign a contract of employment with a with remuneration in line with the salary of the previous General Manager;
3. Authorises the continued appointment of Brian Barrett as Acting General Manager until a permanent General Manager is appointed by Council. This appointment shall be for not less than 3 months and will conclude with the appointment of the permanent General Manager;
4. Terminates the appointment of Elizabeth Richardson as Acting Chief Executive Officer from the date of the appointment of Brian Barrett as Acting General Manager;
5. Delegates to the Mayor the authority to sign an instrument of delegation to Brian Barrett in the same terms as the Council’s delegations to the previous CEO dated 25 February 2019; and
6. Conduct a review of the delegations and report back in an Ordinary meeting in December 2020.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer Against Motion: Cr Passas |
ADJOURNMENT
6.58pm - The Mayor, Clr Byrne adjourned the meeting for a short recess.
7.02pm– The Mayor, Clr Byrne resumed the meeting.
C1020(2) Item 15 Mayoral Minute: Arts Forum |
Motion: (Byrne)
THAT Council writes to the NSW Arts Minister, the NSW Minister for Jobs, Investment, and Tourism, and the NSW Minister for Planning and Public Spaces requesting the following actions identified through the Arts Forum that Council convened:
2. State Government funding to assist small to medium enterprises, which have been unfunded to date; 3. State Government funding to expand the existing arts funding grants, which are administered by local Councils; 4. Assist with planning and DCP challenges to help with the adaptive use of empty shopfronts for the arts sector; 5. Provide more State Government funding to multicultural arts; and 6. Work with Councils to develop a Public Art Strategy. Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer Against Motion: Cr Passas |
C1020(2) Item 16 Mayoral Minute: King George Park and WestConnex |
Motion: (Byrne)
THAT Council: 1. Notes the $2.875 million Council received for the compulsory acquisition of 2,285sqm of land at King George Park); 2. Receive a report back on how the $1.343 million can be dedicated to improving the recreational facilities at King George Park or our other Crown reserves, with preference to be given to parks or reserves in areas significantly affected by WestConnex Stage 3B; 3. Notes the list of priorities of sporting organisations that use King George Park for the sporting ground; 4. Sends a letter from the Mayor to residents of Byrne St, Manning St, Clubb St, Toelle St, Callan St, Springside St, McCleer St and Moodie St asking for their priorities for improvements of public amenities in the area, which will be reported to Council at an Ordinary meeting; and 5. Consults with Balmain Little Athletics, Leichhardt Saints and Leichhardt Juniors Rugby League Club on their priorities and, following this consultation, tabled at an Ordinary meeting. Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Iskandar, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer Against Motion: Crs Hesse, Kiat and Passas |
PUBLIC FORUM
The registered speakers were asked to address the meeting. The list of speakers is available on the last page of these minutes.
ADJOURNMENT
7.47pm - The Mayor, Clr Byrne adjourned the meeting for a short recess.
7.52pm - The Mayor, Clr Byrne resumed the meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
8.03pm - The Mayor, Clr Byrne adjourned the meeting for a short recess.
8.06pm - The Mayor, Clr Byrne resumed the meeting.
C1020(2) Item 17 Mayoral Minute: Wests Tigers Leisure |
Motion: (Byrne)
THAT Council: 1. Notes the correspondence from Justin Pascoe, CEO of Wests Tigers Rugby League Club; and 2. Convenes a meeting with representatives of Wests Tigers Leisure - a joint venture between Wests Tigers Rugby League and Belgravia Leisure - to discuss options for collaboration in Council’s recreational centres, which is to be reported back at an Ordinary Council meeting in December. Motion Lost For Motion: Crs Byrne, Drury, Iskandar, Macri, McKenna OAM and Raciti Against Motion: Crs Da Cruz, Hesse, Kiat, Lockie, Passas, Stamolis and Steer |
C1020(2) Item 18 Mayoral Minute: WestConnex Independent Property Impact Assessment Panel |
Motion: (Byrne)
THAT Council: 1. Notes the motion establishing a Council service to provide independent dilapidation reports for local property owners affected by tunnelling and construction for the WestConnex project, which was adopted at the 24 April 2018 Ordinary meeting; 2. Notes the advice provided by Council officers that the dilapidation service has been discontinued and that Council has written to Transport for NSW requesting that a Council representative be an observer on its Independent Property Impact Assessment Panel; 3. Provides a report on which Council representative is observing the panel’s operation, how frequently it has met and what their assessment is about the fairness and effectiveness of the panel process, which is to be reported to the next Ordinary Council meeting; and 4. Notes Council’s acceptance of Sat Scan Pty Ltd’s offer for the provision of high-level radar-based satellite imagery for areas along the WestConnex toll road route that fall within the Local Government Area for Inner West Council at the 25 August Council meeting. Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer Against Motion: Nil |
ADJOURNMENT
8.22pm - The Mayor, Clr Byrne adjourned the meeting for a short recess.
8.29pm - The Mayor, Clr Byrne resumed the meeting.
The Mayor issued a warning to Clr Passas for her repeated interjections.
C1020(2) Item 20 Mayoral Minute: Stronger Community Grants |
Motion: (Byrne)
THAT Council: 1. Writes to Councils who met the guidelines to qualify for a grant from the NSW Government’s Stronger Communities Fund, but were excluded from applying, and LGNSW, to request their support to pursue the matter, collectively, so we can fight for all our communities; and 2. Requests the General Manager to report back to Council on the written legal advice, once received, of the likely financial commitment to pursue legal action and the willingness of other Councils or the wider industry to support us, ultimately for the purpose of making the decision to proceed or not. Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer Against Motion: Cr Passas |
Suspension of Standing Orders
Motion: (Byrne/Kiat)
THAT Council Suspend Standing Orders to
deal with Item 19 – Financial Statements 2019/20 at this time.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer
Against Motion: Nil
C1020(2) Item 19 Financial Statements 2019/20 |
Motion: (Lockie/Da Cruz)
THAT Council:
1. Receive and note the report; and
2. Endorse the Financial Statements to be placed on public exhibition with a view of tabling the final report at the November 2020 Council meeting.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer Against Motion: Nil |
Resumption of Standing Orders
Motion: (Byrne/McKenna OAM)
THAT Standing Orders be resumed.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer
Against Motion: Nil
Motion: (Drury/Passas)
THAT Council:
1. Adopt the Tempe Reserve Plan of Management as pursuant to Section 40 of the Local Government Act 1993 in accordance with 3.23(6) of the Crown Lands Management Act 2016 subject to the following amendment:
a) Inserting the following sentence at the beginning of Page 39 sub heading Private enterprise ‘Any change in the management of Tempe Reserve to be consulted with the community.’
2. Notes that nothing in the Plan will preclude the ongoing operation of the Tempe Basin Motor Boat Association and notes that a separate briefing will be provided.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer Against Motion: Nil |
C1020(2) Item 2 Proposed 'Inner West Fest 2021' Program in Response to Ongoing Covid-19 Impacts |
Motion: (Byrne/Lockie)
THAT:
1. Council approve the Inner West Fest 2021 proposal as an alternative events program for 2021 due to COVID-19 impacts; and
2. The Wards be amended to show North Ashfield and South Annandale in Leichhardt Ward-Galgadya, South Ashfield in the Djarrawunang Ward and Ashfield and North Annandale in the Balmain Ward- Baludarri.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer Against Motion: Cr Passas |
C1020(2) Item 3 Birchgrove Oval - Fence |
Motion: (Drury/Macri)
THAT Council proceed with the installation of the proposed steel powder-coated picket fence at Birchgrove Oval.
Motion Lost For Motion: Crs Drury, Iskandar, Lockie, Macri and McKenna OAM Against Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Hesse, Kiat, Passas, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer
Foreshadowed Motion (Stamolis/Hesse)
THAT Council:
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer Against Motion: Nil |
Motion: (Byrne/Macri)
THAT Council:
1. Endorse and forward the attached Planning Proposal, facilitating extended trading and cultural activities, to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment with a request for Gateway determination;
2. Request delegation of the plan-making functions for this planning
proposal to Council’s Acting General Manager; 3. Should a favourable Gateway determination be received, publicly exhibit the planning proposal in accordance with any conditions of the Gateway determination and the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979;
4. Receive a post-exhibition report for its consideration;
5. Review the operation of the policy after 12 months and a report prepared for Council; and
6. Review resident parking schemes in surrounding areas.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer Against Motion: Nil |
C1020(2) Item 5 Night Time Economy Action Plan |
Motion: (Lockie/Byrne)
THAT Council adopt the Night-Time Economy Action Plan.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer Against Motion: Cr Passas |
C1020(2) Item 6 Community Gardens Policy |
Motion: (Da Cruz/Stamolis)
THAT Council:
1. Adopts the Community Gardens Policy; and
2. Rescind the existing community garden policies: Leichhardt Council Community Garden Policy 2011 and Ashfield Council Community Gardening Policy 2012.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer Against Motion: Nil |
C1020(2) Item 7 Local Traffic Committee Meeting - October 2020 |
Motion: (Stamolis/Passas)
THAT the Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held in October 2020 be received and the recommendations be adopted.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer Against Motion: Nil |
C1020(2) Item 8 Investment Report as at 30 September 2020 |
Motion: (Drury/Stamolis)
THAT the report be received and noted.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer Against Motion: Nil |
C1020(2) Item 9 Notice of Motion: Inner West Council monitoring of Councillors, staff and residents |
Motion: (Stamolis/Passas)
THAT a report be brought back to Council on Privacy and Information Governance Procedures of Council. Motion Lost For Motion: Crs Da Cruz, Macri, Passas, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer Against Motion: Crs Byrne, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie and McKenna OAM |
Councillor Raciti left the Meeting at 10:13 pm.
C1020(2) Item 10 Notice of Motion: Whites Creek wetlands: update on current works |
Motion: (Stamolis/Da Cruz)
THAT Council to provide an update of current works at the Whites Creek wetlands.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Stamolis and Steer Against Motion: Nil Absent: Cr Raciti |
C1020(2) Item 11 Notice of Motion: Parking on the Princes Highway |
Motion: (Macri/Hesse)
THAT Council resolves to write to the Minister and TFNSW to alert them of the serious impact the lack of action on this simple matter is having on the viability of these businesses in a time when they need to be supported.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Stamolis and Steer Against Motion: Nil Absent: Cr Raciti |
Confidential Session
Motion: (Byrne/Drury)
THAT Council enter into Confidential session.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Stamolis and Steer
Against Motion: Nil
Absent: Cr Raciti
Councillor Raciti returned to the Meeting at 10:20 pm.
That in accordance with Section 10A(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, the following matters be considered in Closed Session of Council for the reasons provided:
C1020(2) Item 13 Balmain Leagues Site - Voluntary Planning Agreement (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
C1020(2) Item 14 Tempe Reserve Synthetic Turf Tender Report (Section 10A(2)(d)(ii) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council.
Motion: (Byrne/Drury)
THAT Council move back into the Open Session of the Council Meeting.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer
Against Motion: Nil
Reports with Confidential Information
C1020(2) Item 13 Balmain Leagues Site - Voluntary Planning Agreement |
Motion: (Drury/Macri)
THAT the proposed Voluntary Planning Agreement for Balmain Leagues Site 138-152 Victoria Road, Rozelle be placed on public exhibition for a minimum of 28 days and be reported back to Council after public exhibition.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer Against Motion: Cr Hesse and Passas |
Motion: (Drury/Macri)
THAT Council accept the tender submitted by The Trustee for the Turf One Unit Trust, 89 Simcock Avenue SPOTSWOOD VIC 3015 for the Tempe Reserve Synthetic Turf Project Option A (One synthetic sports field and upgrade of five natural sports fields) for a total amount of $6,249,791.36 inc GST which includes a lump sum price of $5,434,601.19 including GST and a 15% contingency.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, Drury, , Iskandar, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Raciti and Stamolis Against Motion: Cr Hesse, Passas, Steer, Da Cruz, Kiat |
Meeting closed at 10.30pm.
Public Speakers:
Item #
|
Speaker |
Suburb |
Item 1: |
James McDonald |
St Peters |
Item 9: |
Maire Sheehan |
Annandale |
|
Council Meeting 10 November 2020
|
Subject: Harmonisation of Rates
Prepared By: Daryl Jackson - Chief Financial Officer
Authorised By: Brian Barrett - Acting General Manager
RECOMMENDATION
THAT Council:
1. Acknowledges that the rates harmonisation process is to be implemented before 1 July 2021, in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993;
2. Endorses
the Proposed Rating Structure (categories, sub-categories) as recommended in
the report for community engagement as follows;
3. Endorse the new Minimum Rates as recommended in the report, for community engagement as follows:
· Residential - $850 · Business – General - $820 · Business – Industrial - Marrickville - $820 - St. Peters - $820 - St. Peters North - $820 - Camperdown - $820 · Business Shopping Malls - Ashfield Mall - $820 - Leichhardt Marketplace - $820 - Norton Street Plaza - $820 - Marrickville Metro - $820 ·
Business
Airport - $820
4. Endorses reallocation of Ashfield Mall, Leichhardt Marketplace and Norton Street Plaza from Business General to Business Malls and the redistribution of rates income from Business General to Business Malls as recommended in the report, for community engagement;
5. Commences Community Consultation on the proposed rating structure;
6. Notifies IPART in November 2020 of its intention to apply for a new Minimum Rate, in accordance with the relevant legislation;
7. Following completion of the above Community Consultation, receives a Report on the outcomes of community engagement for the adoption of the Harmonised Rating Structure; and
8. Pending the outcome of community engagement, resolves to submit an application to IPART to obtain approval for the new Minimum Rate.
|
DISCUSSION
Amalgamation and Rates Path Harmonisation
During the Council Amalgamation process, section 218CB was inserted into the Local Government Act 1993. This essentially was a transitional provision, required all amalgamated Councils to continue on their existing pre-amalgamated rating structures for a period of four (4) years from 1 July 2016 through until 30 June 2020. Subsequently, the NSW Government amended the Local Government Act again, extending this deadline until 30 June 2021.
This provision of section 218CB expires at 30th June 2021, meaning that Council will be required to adopt a harmonised rating structure effective from 1st July 2021. Therefore, the rates path freeze will lift, and Inner West Council is required, by Law, to harmonise rates from July 2021.
This requirement to harmonise rates is mandatory, and current NSW legislation does not allow for the harmonisation of rates over a transition period. Furthermore, current NSW legislation does not allow for the continuation of existing pre-amalgamation structures. Council must adopt a new, harmonised rating structure. If Council does not do so, Council will not have a compliant rating structure.
Finally, NSW legislation does not allow Council to make provision compassion to those ratepayers who will be most affected by a sudden and significant change in the rates they are required to pay.
As such, there is no option for Council to continue with these structures. Therefore, it is not within the scope of this project to consider these legacy structures any further.
Proposed Rating Structure
The Act allows rates to set a structure to distribute rates between categories and subcategories of ratepayers and may also charge ordinary rates and special rates. A rate may consist of:
· An ad valorem amount (which may be subject to a minimum amount), or
· A base amount, to which an ad valorem amount is added.
Ad Valorem Only
Use of ad valorem only is not considered to be equitable as it creates significant disparity for ratepayers as it solely relies on the land value for rate calculations. Further it is an ineffective way of addressing the benefits (or user pays) principle. It has therefore not been considered in our analysis.
Minimums
Minimums and Base Amounts both help smooth the impact of land valuations on rates, however a base amount will generally result in a disproportionately lower level of rates for strata apartments. The Base amount is limited due to the fact that the overall value of revenue from base amounts is capped at 50% of the total rates revenue.
The use of a minimum rate structure in higher density areas is desirable as it will result in a higher proportion of ratepayers paying the same minimum amount, and reduces the gap between the lower amount of rates paid (for properties with lower land values, such as apartments) and the average ad valorem amount being paid by ratepayers across the local government area. Officers have l therefore performed scenario analysis based on differing minimum values.
a) Should Council wish to set a minimum rate as is recommended, it is required to: Notify IPART of its intention to set a minimum rate (November 2021)
b) Submit a Minimum Rate Application to IPART. These are currently due 8 February 2021, however a one-month extension has been sought.
Proposed Rating Categories
A simplification of rating categories is proposed. The Rating structure proposed to be established comprise the following categories and sub-categories:
· Residential
· Business – General
· Business – Industrial
· Business – Malls
· Business – Airport
It is considered that an ad valorem subject to a minimum rate should be applied across all proposed rating categories and sub-categories, with this minimum to be set at –
· Residential - Minimum $850
· Business General, Industrial, Malls and Airport - Minimum $820
Determining a New Minimum
The following impact analysis of different minimum levels for Rates has been undertaken -
Residential
Five options were developed and evaluated. Analysis highlighted that land value variations between former councils, along with the 2019 revaluation, have a significant impact on all proposed rating structures.
Consideration was given to:
· Council’s property profile and continued growth in apartments;
· The need to maintain a similar level of rating equity across all property forms and value;
· Having a simple and easy to understand rating structure; and
· Desire to maximising future rates revenue as a result of growth.
Our analysis of these factors has resulted in a recommended Residential harmonised rates structure using an ad valorem with a minimum amount. It is recommended to move to a minimum rate of $850, in order to achieve the greatest degree of equity.
The impact on income is illustrated in the following table
Table 1: Residential Rates Income by Former Council
The high level outcome for the resdiential category is detailed in the following figure.
The following table demonstrates the impact of the recommended option, being a minimum rate of $850, across Inner West Council’s LGA, based on a percentile of land value.
Table 2: Recommended Comparative Change by Land Value
Further the following table demonstrates the impact of the recommended option, a minimum of $850, by former LGA, based on a percentile of land value.
Table 3: Former Council Comparative Change for Recommendation
To understand the degree of impact the following table illustrates the range in dollar changes across the Inner West Council residential assessments for the recommended option of a $850 minimum.
Table 4: Dollar Range Analysis by Assessment Numbers
The following table illustrates the range in dollar changes across the former Councils residential assessments for the recommended option of a $850 minimum.
Table 5: Former Council Dollar Range Analysis by Assessment Numbers
Business General
Five options were developed and evaluated. Consideration was given to:
· Maintaining a similar level of rating equity across all property forms and value;
· Having a simple and easy to understand rating structure; and
· Maximising future rates revenue from growth.
The preferred option should have the least impact on each former council and maintains key rating principles of equity and simplicity.
Analysis of these factors has resulted in a preferred Business General harmonised rates structure using an ad valorem with a minimum amount of $820, and a redistribution of $600,000 from Business General to Business Malls to improve alignment between benefits received and rates paid.
The impact on income is illustrated in the following table:
Table 6: Business General Income by Former Council
The high-level outcome for the Business category is detailed in the following figure
Figure 2 – Recommended Outcome
To understand the degree of impact the following table illustrates the range in dollar changes across the Inner West Council Business General assessments for the recommended option of a $820 minimum and the transfer of $600,000 from Business General to Business Mall.
Table 7: Dollar Range Analysis by Assessment Numbers
The following table demonstrates the changes in rates being charged to ratepayers with a minimum set at $820 and the redistribution of $600,000 to Business Malls sub-category, for each former LGA.
Table 8 Former Council Dollar Range Analysis by assessment numbers
The following table demonstrates the impact of the recommended option, a minimum rate of $820 and the transfer of $600,000 to Business Malls, across Inner West Council’s LGA, based on a percentile of land value.
Table 9 Recommended Option Comparative Change by Land Value
Business Industrial
There are no proposed changes to the current structure or income yield with the exception of including a minimum of $820, having no impact
Business Mall
Under the current legacy rating structures, only Marrickville Metro is separately rated as a stand- alone sub-category. The recommended structure is to transfer Ashfield Mall, Leichhardt Marketplace and Norton Street Plaza from Business General and into Business Malls sub-category. The following table details the current rates paid by each Mall.
Table 10 Current Mall Rates
Part of the recommended structure is to redistribute $600,000 of rates revenue from Business General to Business Malls to improve alignment between benefits received and rates paid. The following table demonstrates the impact of the redistribution of the $600,000 based on percentage of property value.
Table 11 Mall Income distribution with $600,000 transfer
Business Airport
There are no proposed changes to the current structure or income yield with the exception of including a minimum of $820, having no impact.
COMMUNITY CONSULTATION
The community engagement process should ensure that ratepayers are given an opportunity to be made aware of why council is required to make this change to the rating structure, inform ratepayers of the impact of the change to their rates and allow ratepayers an opportunity to provide Council with their feedback.
So as enable thorough community consultation, Council staff have requested an extension to IPARTs (current) deadline of the 8 February 2021, for the submission of the minimum rate variation. In consultation with IPART, an extension has been sought until the 10 March 2021. Councillors will be advised separately if that extension application is unsuccessful, thereby needing to advance the community engagement timeline.
Council has developed a robust Communications and Engagement Plan which allows for an extended community engagement period due to the December and January holiday period, in accordance with Council’s adopted Community Engagement Framework.
The plan includes:
· Dedicated project page on Council’s community engagement website, Your Say Inner West
· Extensive promotion to ratepayers and broader community including mail-out to ratepayers, information flyer, promotion through Council’s channels including e-news, social media and traditional media, updates on corporate web page, targeted emails to stakeholders e.g. business chambers
· Inclusive communication including provision of information translated to top community languages, promotion of translator service, and provision in accessible formats for people with disability
· Information session hosted by Council’s Finance team, online Q & A function enabled and contact officer for phone calls throughout engagement period
After the engagement period closes, a comprehensive Engagement Outcomes Report will be published and reported to the elected Council.
HARMONISATION TIMETABLE
The remainder of the Rates Harmonisation timetable is as follows:
Activities |
Month |
Council report – resolution to endorse engagement program |
November 2020 |
Notify IPART SR Minimum Rating Structure |
November 2020 |
Prepare Communications and Engagement material - Ratepayers |
November/December 2020 |
Engage Ratepayers |
Early December–14 February 2021 |
Publish Engagement Outcomes Report |
February 2021 |
Council report - Endorse/Adopt New Rating Structure |
9 March 2021 |
Submit SR Minimum Rate Application IPART |
10 March 2021 |
IPART decision following public exhibition |
TBA |
LIVE - July 2021 (Issue Rates Notices) |
July 2021 |
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Should Council not establish proposed Minimum Rates as recommended within this paper at this time, Council will be unable to raise the Minimum Rate until future years (given the requirement of community consultation and IPART approval).
In these circumstances, Council will need to consider an alternative structure. Council may resolve to adopt the Statutory Minimum Rate (section 548(3)(a) of the Local Government Act 1993) plus ad valorem. This statutory minimum is prescribed in Regulation 126 (Local Government Regulations 2005). This is set at $554.
The effect of this is that ratepayers with lower land values will (e.g. apartments) will be subject to a lower significantly lower Minimum Rate, and the remaining Rates Base being distributed to all other ratepayers. This model is undesirable as it less equitable and does not address key issues such as of benefits provided / user pays principles.
SUMMARY
Council is required to harmonise its rating structure by 1 July 2021.
A rating structure has been recommended in this report that:
· Does not increase the overall yield received from rates;
· Distributes the yield received from rates equitably across the entire LGA having regard to property land values;
· Sets a minimum Residential rate of $850.00 as this will provide rating equity across all property forms and value, including apartments; without unreasonably burdening those properties in the lower property value brackets; and
· Proposes Business rates being charged to ratepayers with a minimum set at $820 and the redistribution of $600,000 to Business Malls sub-category to improve alignment between benefits received and rates paid.
Should Council endorse the structure in principle, it will proceed to community engagement, before being reported back to Council in March 2021.
|
Council Meeting 10 November 2020
|
Subject: Reprioritisation of Park Plans of Management-Alignment with the Land & Property Strategy (LAPS)
Prepared By: Aaron Callaghan - Parks and Recreation Planning Manager
Authorised By: Elizabeth Richardson - Acting Chief Executive Officer
RECOMMENDATION
THAT Council adopt the revised schedule of Park Plans of Management implementation works (Attachment 1) in order to align with the delivery of the Land and Property strategy.
|
DISCUSSION
In November 2018, Council adopted a priority list of Park Plans of Management for all 269 of its parks. Legislatively, Park Plans of management must be developed for all parks regardless of their size. With the adoption of the LPS it is important that Council reviews it priorities in terms of Park Plans of Management to ensure that key priorities adopted in this strategy align with the delivery of Park Plans of Management. This is critically important in relation to leasing and licensing requirements within parks where Council is exposed to risk where an expired lease or license is in hold over and there is no specific park plan of management in place to facilitate or provide direction on a new lease or license agreement.
In relation to the above Council officers have reviewed the priority list in relation to Park Plans of Management and revised the priority plans to align with the LPS. A revised Parks Plan of Management Priority list has been attached as Attachment 1. The adoption of a revised priority plan will enable Council to move forward with delivering key Park Plans of Management and address outstanding leasing and licensing issues which are currently in hold over or pending future Council consideration.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Council has a budget of $210K in 2019/20 for the delivery of Parks Plans of Management. In relation to this budget $180K is specifically directed towards Crown Reserve Land Plans of Management.
1.⇩ |
Park Plans of Management Priority List 2020 |
Council Meeting 10 November 2020
|
Subject: Adoption Leichhardt Park Plan of Management
Prepared By: Aaron Callaghan - Parks and Recreation Planning Manager
Authorised By: Elizabeth Richardson - Acting Chief Executive Officer
RECOMMENDATION
THAT Council adopt the Leichhardt Park Plan of Management as pursuant to Section 40 of the Local Government Act 1993 in accordance with 3.23(6) of the Crown Lands Management Act 2016. |
DISCUSSION
On 28th April 2020 Council endorsed a Draft Plan of Management for Leichhardt Park. Following endorsement, the draft Plan was submitted to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment – Crown Lands. The Plan of Management was reviewed by the Crown and was confirmed to satisfy the requirements under section 3.23 of the Crown Land Management Act 2016 on 27th September 2020. Subsequently on receipt of this confirmation, the Draft Plan of Management was exhibited by Council for additional community input from the 12th August 2020 to 19th October 2020. A full summary of the community feedback can be viewed in the Community Engagement report:
https://yoursay.innerwest.nsw.gov.au/46797/widgets/250073/documents/185211
Key community issues highlighted in the Engagement report included:
Para rowing facility
· There were competing views on the Para rowing facility, from strong support to strong opposition. Responders commented that the rowing facility was supported by Leichhardt Rowing Club, however there was also strong opposition from some local residents about disrupting views from the park and closing in and the loss of open space.
· Some responses questioned the need for a separate rowing facility when Leichhardt Rowing Club is already located in the park. The responses requested that the Para Rowing facility be included in an expanded version of the existing rowing club.
· Council officers have also previously highlighted concerns in relation to the impact that this facility will have on the Iron Cove Bay Run in this location. This will need to be carefully assessed in any future Development Application submitted by NSW Para-Rowing.
Proposed Lilyfield Skate Plaza
· There were a variety of responses regarding the proposed Lilyfield Skate Plaza. Whilst responses generally supported the need for a skate facility within the Leichhardt Ward and were even supportive of a skate plaza in Leichhardt Park, about half the responses wanted the skate plaza moved to a location other than the proposed.
· One response questioned the need for a skate plaza within Leichhardt Park considering there is a skate park in Five Dock.
· There were requests for the skate plaza to include a skate bowl to ensure the facility was inclusive of a variety of skate types.
Synthetic Turf Field
· There were a variety of responses regarding the Leichhardt Oval 2 being converted into a synthetic field. However, responses were generally supportive of the synthetic surface with comments noting the opportunities for increased use and less wet weather delays.
Following the outcomes of the community engagement a revised plan of management and master plan has been developed for Leichhardt Park (Attachments 1 and 2). The Master Plan for Leichhardt Park can be viewed from Page 52-61 of Attachment 1.
Key Changes since the Draft Exhibition
No key master plan changes have been made to the draft master plan since its exhibition. The leasing and licensing section has been made clearer to allow for any future new recreational or sporting activities (including rowing) and long term lease arrangements in terms of permissible uses.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The adoption of the Leichhardt Plan of Management will allow Council to proceed with capital improvement works at Leichhardt Park, including the delivery of the Leichardt Park Skate Plaza a future artificial synthetic surface program and improvements to traffic circulation within the park generally. The NSW Para-Rowing Proposal is a complex project which will require significant funding from others as well as significant planning approvals. A costed capital works program will be developed over the lifetime of the Plan of Management as adopted priority actions are further developed.
Attachments 1 and 2 have been published separately in the Attachments Document on Council’s Website https://www.innerwest.nsw.gov.au/about/the-council/council-meetings/current-council-meetings
Leichhardt Park Plan of Management – Published separately on Council’s website |
|
Appendicies Leichhardt Park Plan of Management - Published separately on Council’s website |
|
Council Meeting 10 November 2020
|
Subject: Post Exhibition - Heritage Listing - 389 Illawarra Road, Marrickville
Prepared By: Jarrad Sheather - Strategic Planner
Authorised By: Harjeet Atwal - Senior Manager Planning
RECOMMENDATION
THAT Council:
1. Support the amendments to the Marrickville Local Environmental Plan (MLEP 2011) to list 389 Illawarra Road, Marrickville as an item of local heritage significance;
2. Delegate to the Chief Executive Officer or equivalent the authority to finalise the making of the MLEP 2011 amendment; and
3. Forward the planning proposal to the Department of Planning Industry and Environment for finalisation and publication on the NSW Legislation website.
|
DISCUSSION
On 15 January 2020, an Interim Heritage Order (IHO) was issued for 389 Illawarra Road, Marrickville in response to the imminent threat posed by a Development Application (DA) seeking demolition of all buildings on the site and construction of a 6 storey mixed use development containing ground floor retail tenancies with boarding rooms and short term accommodation dwellings above. The applicant lodged a subsequent deemed refusal appeal to the Land and Environment Court for the DA and a separate appeal against the IHO.
A heritage assessment by Hector Abrahams Architects (Attachment 1) concluded that the church meets the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage’s criteria for local heritage significance and recommends its listing as a heritage item. On 23 June 2020, the Planning Proposal was endorsed by Council to be sent to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) for Gateway determination (Attachment 2). The planning proposal was exhibited between 7 August and 4 September 2020. 299 submissions were received during the exhibition period (297 responses to the survey on the Have Your Say Inner West and 2 emailed submissions).
79 submissions exclusively opposed the heritage listing on the grounds that it would prevent demolition of the building and thus redevelopment of the site for affordable housing. Likewise, 5 submissions supporting heritage listing exclusively referred to the overdevelopment of the site. It is important to note that for the purpose of this report, the assessment of the heritage significance of the site is under consideration, rather than the merits of any possible redevelopment if the site is not heritage listed. If the submissions that relate specifically to the concurrent DA are not included in the calculations, of 213 submissions, 135 (63%) are in support of heritage listing and 74 (35%) oppose it.
Reasons for supporting the listing included that the church has heritage significance, is part of local history, adds to the streetscape and local character, and is valued by the local community and should be adaptively reused. Reasons for opposing the listing included that it is redundant and unusable, the use of an IHO once a DA is lodged is bad process and that the church is decaying and structurally unsound. Engagement outcomes are discussed in the Community Engagement Outcomes report which includes Officers response to the submissions (Attachment 3).
The owner of the site, the Churches of Christ Property Trust made a submission against heritage listing the site which contested the views and interpretations of the heritage assessment, the benefits of the use proposed under the DA and the lack of heritage value.
A submission was received from NSW Heritage in support of the heritage listing as they consider the church to meet the criteria for local heritage significance (Attachment 4).
In conclusion, Council support the amendments to Marrickville Local Environmental Plan 2011 to list 389 Illawarra Road as an item of heritage significance.
Attachment 1 has been published separately in the Attachments Document on Council’s Website https://www.innerwest.nsw.gov.au/about/the-council/council-meetings/current-council-meetings
Heritage assessment by Hector Abrahams Architects - Published separately on Council’s website |
|
Gateway Determination |
|
3.⇩ |
Engagement Outcomes Report |
4.⇩ |
Heritage NSW submission |
|
Council Meeting 10 November 2020
|
|
Council Meeting 10 November 2020
|
Subject: WestConnex Independent Property Impact Assessment Panel
Prepared By: Cathy Edwards-Davis - Director Infrastructure
Authorised By: Brian Barrett - Acting General Manager
RECOMMENDATION
THAT the report be received and noted.
|
DISCUSSION
At the Council meeting on the 27 October 2020 a Mayoral Minute was considered and Council resolved (in part):
‘THAT Council:
1. Notes the motion establishing a Council service to provide independent dilapidation reports for local property owners affected by tunnelling and construction for the WestConnex project, which was adopted at the 24 April 2018 Ordinary meeting;
2. Notes the advice provided by Council officers that the dilapidation service has been discontinued and that Council has written to Transport for NSW requesting that a Council representative be an observer on its Independent Property Impact Assessment Panel (See below and Attachment 1);
3. Provides a report on which Council representative is observing the panel’s operation, how frequently it has met and what their assessment is about the fairness and effectiveness of the panel process, which is to be reported to the next Ordinary Council meeting;’
As noted in the resolution, Council has written to Transport for NSW requesting that Council be an observer on the Property Impact Assessment Panel. To date, Transport for NSW have not acceded to this request.
Anecdotally, staff have been advised by residents that they are generally happy with the dilapidation reports being undertaken by the WestConnex contractors in more recent years.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The independent dilapidation reports previously being prepared by Council were undertaken by staff who, through the Council restructure process, did not have a permanent role but were covered by the five year job protections. These staff have now all left Council and there are no resources available to offer this service to residents. If Council wishes to reinstate this service, a budget will need to be identified.
|
Council Meeting 10 November 2020
|
Subject: Notice of Motion to Rescind: Adoption of Tempe Reserve Plan of Management - 27 October 2020
From: Councillors Julie Passas, Marghanita Da Cruz and John Stamolis
Motion:
We, the abovementioned Councillors, hereby submit a Notice of Motion to rescind Council’s resolution of C1020(2) Item 1 Adoption - Tempe Reserve Plan of Management, and propose the alternative Motion be adopted as follows:
THAT Council discuss and resolve problems with synthetic turf at Arlington Oval.
|
Background
Council resolved the following on 27 October 2020:
C1020(2) Item 1 Adoption - Tempe Reserve Plan of Management |
Motion: (Drury/Passas)
THAT Council:
1. Adopt the Tempe Reserve Plan of Management as pursuant to Section 40 of the Local Government Act 1993 in accordance with 3.23(6) of the Crown Lands Management Act 2016 subject to the following amendment:
a) Inserting the following sentence at the beginning of Page 39 sub heading Private enterprise ‘Any change in the management of Tempe Reserve to be consulted with the community.’
2. Notes that nothing in the Plan will preclude the ongoing operation of the Tempe Basin Motor Boat Association and notes that a separate briefing will be provided.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Hesse, Iskandar, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Raciti, Stamolis and Steer Against Motion: Nil |
|
Council Meeting 10 November 2020
|
Subject: Notice of Motion: Completion of works - Elizabeth Street Ashfield 'Pocket Park'
From: Councillor Julie Passas
Motion:
THAT the works for the ‘Pocket Park’ in Elizabeth Street, Ashfield be completed immediately and a request for a new shade cloth be installed. |
Background
Council resolved to upgrade the Elizabeth Street, Ashfield Pocket park. New play equipment, fence and gate, the works have not been completed as per the resolution.
Again, it is unfortunate that I must put forward a motion on this issue.
Therefore, I move that the works for the ‘Pocket Park’ in Elizabeth Street, Ashfield be completed immediately and a request for a new shade cloth be installed.
Officer’s Comments:
Comment from Director Infrasturture:
Council has just upgraded the pocket park in Elizabeth Street, Ashfield at a cost of $91,000. The design of the new playground was undertaken in consultation with the community. The engagement process is outlined on the Inner West Your Say website.
A new fence has been installed as part of the upgrade works, along the full frontage of Elizabeth Street and along approximately half of the laneway frontage. Only half of the laneway was fenced to protect the urban landscape and amenity of the area. The laneway along the park is deemed as low risk as it is a short, no through road and is only used by one garage of the house adjacent. Council has addressed the high-risk issue which is the main road in front of the playground and addressed any potential of children running out from the main equipment areas.
There are currently no plans to install a shade sail at the Elizabeth Street Park. There is a large Camphor Laurel tree that provides natural shade to the playground for the south and westerly sun light. The tree is classified as ‘Significant’ value, so it is protected and will stay on the site for years. Staff are currently planning to plant one additional tree at the front of the park to provide additional shade to the playground. It is noted that the adjacent residence has solar panels on the roof, facing the playground. A shade sail may impact on these solar panels.
1.⇩ |
Photo of Pocket Park |
|
Council Meeting 10 November 2020
|
Subject: Notice of Motion: Cleaning Regime Town Centres
From: Councillor Julie Passas
Motion:
THAT Council receive a report at the next Ordinary Council meeting detailing Council’s cleaning schedule in Ashfield and other Town Centres. |
Background
This motion is to highlight the ongoing complaints to me by our residents on the unacceptable lack of cleanliness and maintenance of the Ashfield shopping Centre.
It is imperative that our residents feel confident that their Council take cleanliness and hygiene seriously.
The attached photos show that our street bins have not been cleaned for a lengthy period. The photo of the clean bin from an adjoining council area highlights the issue.
Officer’s Comments:
Comment from Director Infrastructure:
Staff sweep main streets seven days per week, as per the adopted Council service standard. The bins on main streets are emptied four times per week.
Staff will arrange for the bins in the Ashfield Town Centre to be cleaned by the end of November.
1.⇩ |
Photos of Bins |
Council Meeting 10 November 2020
|
Subject: Notice of Motion: Fees to Pool
From: Councillor Julie Passas
Motion:
THAT Council survey and report back to Council the fee structure on all pools operated by Council in our Local Government Area with the view for Council to decide entry and user costs and that the previously provided free one-off family pass for Ashfield residents continue. This pass was sent out with rate notices. Also, Council has an obligation to ensure that learn to swim facilities are available for people on low incomes and support benefits, for that purpose entry fee should be waived for these attending learn to swim classes.
|
Background
The Ashfield Swimming pool complex was built for the residents of Ashfield and surrounding areas, with the aim of promoting a community recreation facility that is accessible to all in the area.
For that purpose, it should have an entry fee structure that facilitates ease of use without undue financial burden.
The demographic of the area is such that most people are working families and retirees who would find it onerous to afford a yearly upfront entry subscription fee.
For that reason I recommend that Council survey and report back to Council the fee structure on all pools operated by Council in our Local Government Area with the view for Council to decide entry and user costs and that the previously provided free one off family pass for Ashfield residents continue. This pass was sent out with rate notices. Also, Council has an obligation to ensure that learn to swim facilities are available for people on low incomes and support benefits, for that purpose entry fee should be waived for these attending learn to swim classes.
Officer’s Comments:
Comment from Chief Operating Officer, Director Development and Recreation:
The fees and charges for the Ashfield Aquatic Centre (AAC) have been derived from the various fee rates that have existed at both the Leichhardt park Aquatic Centre (LPAC) and the Annette Kellerman Aquatic Centre (AKAC) facilities, and were industry benchmarked. These fees and charges were exhibited and adopted as part of Council FY20/21 Annual Budget.
The AAC now has a range of additional services for health and fitness that were not in place prior to the closure which required new fees to be created. The fees for the AAC represent good value across a wide range of services. It should be noted that fees and charges over coming years will need to be progressively harmonised in order to create a single equitable fee structure and move away from the variations that have existed in former LGA fee structures. A planned approach with incremental adjustments is the preferred way forward on this issue. It is proposed that the harmonisation of fees and charges over time and submitted to the annual review process will ensure that process is followed in relation to ongoing review of fees and charges.
There are a range of current fees at AAC to suit regular entry, seniors and pensioners, and school aged children for services available at the AAC. There are also a range of fee payment options at AAC including single casual entry, multi pass options, direct debit and upfront payment options for learn-to-swim and gym; with 1 month memberships all the way through to 12 month memberships.
|
Council Meeting 10 November 2020
|
Subject: Notice of Motion: Final Pool Costs - Ashfield Pool
From: Councillor Julie Passas
Motion:
THAT Council receive a detailed comprehensive report on the final costs to date which includes unfunded works, new items included that were not in the original budget.
|
Background
The full accurate costs of the new swimming facility at Ashfield has not been disclosed. Many residents have requested that the exact amount be made public.
This motion calls for a detailed comprehensive report on the final costs to date which includes unfunded works, new items included that were not in the original budget.
Officer’s Comments:
Comment from Director Infrastructure:
There are a small number of variations which are still under consideration. Staff will aim to have a report to the 8 December 2020 Council meeting, once these variations have been finalised.
|
Council Meeting 10 November 2020
|
Subject: Notice of Motion: Damage to Council Property
From: Councillor Julie Passas
Motion:
THAT Council receive a full report on Council’s policy regarding restoration and damage to public property. |
Background
This motion calls for a full report on Council’s policy regarding restoration works and damage to public property.
Service providers such as Telstra, NBN, Sydney Water etc. consistently dig up new works that Council has undertaken. The damage is left in a sorry state for lengthy periods.
Answers to the following should be provided in the report:
- Do the service providers compensate Council for restoration?
- What is the time frame for works to be completed?
- Where in the Council budget are the funds detailed?
Attached are letters from a few residents’ concerns.
Officer’s Comments:
Comment from Director Infrastructure:
A report can be provided to the 8 December 2020 Council meeting.
1.⇩ |
Letters from residents |
Council Meeting 10 November 2020
|
Subject: Notice of Motion: Synthetic Turf and Arlington Oval
From: Councillor Julie Passas
Motion:
THAT Council receive a report on:
1. What caused the deterioration of the synthetic turf at Arlington Oval after a short period;
2. What duration the synthetic turf should have had;
3. The terms and conditions of the contract and warranty why these terms and conditions have caused considerable cost on Council;
4. How Council can be assured that the replacement surface will last, and further major costs are not incurred; and
5. What is the warranty of the new surface.
|
Background
In April 2020, Council did major works to replace the synthetic turf at Arlington Oval.
These works were done only five and a half years since the turf was laid and opened for sports use. This seems to be a very short life span for synthetic turf.
It seems odd that Council should have to pay any cost to replace the turf after such a short time. What are the terms and conditions of the warranty. It seems that these terms and conditions were not favourable to ratepayers.
The report to Councillors suggests that deterioration of the surface commenced after four years of use. This is alarming. Was there a problem with the surface, the installation or overuse, or all.
What can we expect with the current replacement. Council cannot afford to do this every 5 years.
Officer’s Comments:
Comment from Director Infrastructure:
A report can be provided to the 24 November 2020 meeting.
|
Council Meeting 10 November 2020
|
Subject: Tender Recommendation-IWC Parramatta Rd Urban Amenity Improvement - Construction - T07-20
Prepared By: Stephen Joannidis - Urban Amenity Improvement - Delivery Manager
Authorised By: Cathy Edwards-Davis - Director Infrastructure
RECOMMENDATION
THAT Council:
1. Adopt the recommendation contained in Confidential Attachment 1: and
2. Inform the unsuccessful Tenderers of the resolution to decline to accept those tenders.
|
DISCUSSION
In accordance with Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 – Reg 178.
(1) After considering the tenders submitted for a proposed contract, the council must either:
(a) accept the tender that, having regard to all the circumstances, appears to it to be the most advantageous, or
(b) decline to accept any of the tenders.
On the Tuesday 8th September 2020 Inner West Council invited tenders for the construction of the IWC Parramatta Road Urban Amenity Improvements. Following an evaluation of the 8 submissions received the panel seeks approval to form a contract as per the recommendation contained in confidential attachment 1.
A copy of the full tender evaluation report is attached.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
This Project is fully funded by the NSW Government
T07-20 PRUAIP Tender Evaluation Report - Confidential |