|
AGENDA R |
Council Meeting
TUESDAY 14 FEBRUARY 2023
6.30pm
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Live Streaming of Council Meeting
In the spirit of open, accessible and transparent government, this meeting of the Inner West Council is being streamed live on Council’s website. By speaking at a Council meeting, members of the public agree to being recorded and must ensure their speech to the Council is respectful and use appropriate language. A person who uses defamatory, discriminatory or offensive language may be exposed to liability for which Council takes no responsibility. Any part of this meeting that is held in closed session will not be recorded
Pre-Registration to Speak at Council Meetings
Members of the public must register by 2pm of the day of the Meeting to speak at Council Meetings. If you wish to register to speak please fill in a Register to Speak Form, available from the Inner West Council website, including:
Are there any rules for speaking at a Council Meeting?
The following rules apply when addressing a Council meeting:
What happens after I submit the form?
You will be contacted by Governance Staff to confirm your registration. If you indicated that you will speak online, you will be provided with a link to the online meeting. Your request will then be added to a list that is shown to the Chairperson on the night of the meeting.
Where Items are deferred, Council reserves the right to defer speakers until that Item is heard on the next occasion.
Accessibility
Inner West Council is committed to ensuring people with a disability have equal opportunity to take part in Council and Committee Meetings. At the Ashfield Council Chambers there is a hearing loop service available to assist persons with a hearing impairment. If you have any other access or disability related participation needs and wish to know more, call 9392 5657.
Persons in the public gallery are advised that under the Local Government Act 1993, a person may NOT record a Council meeting without the permission of Council.
Any persons found recording without authority will be expelled from the meeting.
“Record” includes the use of any form of audio, video and still camera equipment or mobile phone capable of recording speech.
An audio recording of this meeting will be taken for the purpose of verifying the accuracy of the minutes.
Statement of Ethical Obligations
The Mayor and Councillors are bound by the Oath/ Affirmation of Office made at the start of the Council term to undertake their civic duties in the best interests of the people of the Inner West Council and to faithfully and impartially carry out the functions, powers, authorities and discretions vested in them under the Local Government Act or any other Act, to the best of their skill and judgement.
It is also a requirement that the Mayor and Councillors disclose conflicts of interest in relation to items listed for consideration on the Agenda or which are considered at this meeting in accordance with Council’s Code of Conduct and Code of Meeting Practice.
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
|
PRECIS |
VOLUME 1 OF 2
1 Acknowledgement of Country
2 Apologies
3 Notice of Webcasting
4 Disclosures of Interest
5 Moment of Quiet Contemplation
6 Confirmation of Minutes Page
Minutes of 6 December 2022 Council Meeting 7
Minutes of 13 December 2022 Extraordinary Council Meeting 28
Minutes of 13 December 2022 Extraordinary Council Meeting 30
7 Public Forum – Hearing from All Registered Speakers
8 Condolence Motions
Nil at the time of printing.
9 Mayoral Minutes
Nil at the time of printing.
10 Reports for Council Decision
ITEM Page
C0223(1) Item 1 December Quarterly Budget Reporting Statement, and Delivery Program 2022-26 and Operational Plan 2022-23 - Quarter Two Report 54
C0223(1) Item 2 Inner West Council De-Amalgamation Business Case 152
C0223(1) Item 3 Main Street Revitalisation Expression of Interest process 155
C0223(1) Item 4 67-75 Lords Road, Leichhardt - Planning Proposal 160
C0223(1) Item 5 Post Exhibition Report 469R Princes Highway, Sydenham - Voluntary Planning Agreement 392
C0223(1) Item 6 Local Traffic Committee Meeting - 5 December 2022 408
C0223(1) Item 7 Change to procurement regulations and review of Guidelines 417
C0223(1) Item 8 Conduct of the Local Government Election September 2024 421
C0223(1) Item 9 Post Exhibition - Amended Model Code of Meeting Practice 433
C0223(1) Item 10 National General Assembly of Local Government 2023 492
C0223(1) Item 11 Councillor Representation on Committees 518
VOLUME 2 OF 2
11 Reports for Noting
ITEM Page
C0223(1) Item 12 2021/22 Annual Disclosure of Interest 522
C0223(1) Item 13 Investment Report at 30 November 2022 530
C0223(1) Item 14 Investment Report at 31 December 2022 559
C0223(1) Item 15 Investment Report at 31 January 2023 584
C0223(1) Item 16 Impact of Airbnb on rental housing supply 609
C0223(1) Item 17 Arts Summit - Update and Draft Report for Endorsement 611
C0223(1) Item 18 Update to the Land Register 624
C0223(1) Item 19 Update on Town Halls 669
12 Rescission Motions
ITEM Page
C0223(1) Item 20 Notice of Motion to Rescind: C1122(1) Item 21 Notice of Motion: Council Advertising and Inner West News 674
13 Notices of Motion
ITEM Page
C0223(1) Item 21 Notice of Motion: Tree Management in Pioneer Park 676
C0223(1) Item 22 Notice of Motion: Request for update on Transport for NSW (Roads) deliverables 678
C0223(1) Item 23 Notice of Motion: Parramatta to CBD Foreshore Link 91km path 729
C0223(1) Item 24 Notice of Motion: Protecting the Right to Peaceful Non-Violent Protest in NSW 731
C0223(1) Item 25 Notice of Motion: School-based market leases 733
C0223(1) Item 26 Notice of Motion: Callan Park community use 734
C0223(1) Item 27 Notice of Motion: Rozelle Parklands Transport and Traffic Assessment 735
C0223(1) Item 28 Notice of Motion: St Peter’s Station Accessibility 736
14 Questions From Councillors
ITEM Page
C0223(1) Item 29 Question on Notice: Rental Income 737
C0223(1) Item 30 Question on Notice: Staff changes 741
C0223(1) Item 31 Question on Notice: Employee Termination Costs 742
15 Reports with Confidential Information
Reports appearing in this section of the Business Paper contain confidential information in attachments.
The confidential information has been circulated separately.
ITEM Page
C0223(1) Item 32 Update on the acquisition of investment properties 743
C0223(1) Item 33 Lease of 10 Norton Street, Ashfield 745
C0223(1) Item 34 Appointment of Independent ARIC member 746
C0223(1) Item 35 Summer Hill Reuse Centre - Update 747
C0223(1) Item 36 RFT 27-22 External Legal Panel 761
C0223(1) Item 37 RFT 20-22 HJ Mahoney Reserve Amenities Works 762
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting held on 6 December 2022 at Ashfield Service Centre
Meeting commenced at 6.32 pm
|
Present: |
|
|
Darcy Byrne Philippa Scott Liz Atkins Marghanita Da Cruz Jessica D’Arienzo Mark Drury Dylan Griffiths Mathew Howard Justine Langford Pauline Lockie Kobi Shetty Chloe Smith John Stamolis Timothy Stephens Zoi Tsardoulias Simone Plummer |
Mayor Deputy Mayor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor General Manager Director Planning |
|
Ryann Midei |
Director Infrastructure |
|
Ruth Callaghan Kelly Loveridge Beau-Jane De Costa Matthew Pearce Daryl Jackson David Daniels Cassie Malone Denise Benger Katie Miles |
Director Community Director Corporate Senior Manager Governance and Risk General Counsel Chief Financial Officer Audit Office Audit Office Acting Manager Strategic Planning Acting Team Leader Infrastructure Planning |
|
Katherine Paixao |
Business Paper Coordinator |
APOLOGIES: Nil
DISCLOSURES OF INTERESTS:
Clr Scott declared a significant, pecuniary interest in Item 9 Public Domain Master Plans as her residence appears in the public domain masterplan study area for the Norton Street and Marion Street precinct. She will exit the chamber during discussion and voting of the item.
Clr Scott declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 17 IWC Sporting Ground Condition Report as she is the President of Sydney Secondary College (SSC) P&C. The SSC Oval is a shared sporting ground with Inner West Council and is in the portfolio of sporting groups which are subject to the condition report and upgrade program. The program is general to all sporting grounds and not specific to SSC, therefore she will stay in the meeting for discussion and voting on this item.
Clr Scott declared a significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 42 Notice of Motion: Leichhardt Tramsheds as she is the President of Sydney Secondary College P&C. The neglect of the Leichhardt Tramsheds has been of significant detriment to SSC. Any change to its use would be of benefit to the school. She will exit the chamber during discussion and voting of the item.
Clr Howard declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 19 Local Traffic Committee Meeting – 21 November 2022 as he works in the Office of the State Member for Summer Hill who has a representative on the Local Traffic Committee. He will remain and participate in the meeting for discussion and voting as the vote of the State Member is exercised through a representative.
Clr Langford declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 53 Notice of Motion: Natural area restoration opportunity as she lives near the site that has been identified and she is of the opinion that it would not add any value to her property and therefore she will stay in the meeting for discussion and voting on this item.
Motion: (Stephens/Atkins)
That Council note the disclosures of interest.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Against Motion: Nil
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
|
That the Minutes of the Council Meeting held on Tuesday, 8 November 2022 be confirmed as a correct record. Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil |
Procedural Motion (Byrne/Drury)
That the meeting be adjourned for 2 minutes.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Against Motion: Nil
The meeting was adjourned at 6.41pm
The meeting recommenced at 6.42pm
PUBLIC FORUM
The registered speakers were asked to address the meeting. The list of speakers is available on the last page of these minutes.
The Mayor, Councillor Byrne left the Meeting and vacated the chair at 7:14 pm. The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Scott assumed the chair.
The Mayor, Councillor Byrne returned to the Meeting at 8:23 pm. The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Scott vacated the chair and the Mayor, Councillor Byrne assumed the chair.
Procedural Motion (Scott/Stephens)
That the meeting be adjourned for 5 minutes.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Against Motion: Nil
The meeting was adjourned at 8.57pm
The meeting recommenced at 9.04pm
|
That Council write to Victor Pinkerton’s sister Georgie Beazley offering our condolences to his family and plant a tree in Annandale in Victor’s memory.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil |
Procedural Motion (Scott/Howard)
That Council allow the Mayor, Councillor Byrne to speak for 1 additional minute in his right of reply in Item 17.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Against Motion: Nil
|
That Council:
1. Condemns the NSW Government’s cuts to key sporting and community infrastructure from the final design plans for the Rozelle Parklands, which includes the loss of the all-weather sporting field, all public car parking, 2 multipurpose sports courts, and the toilet facilities for the children’s playground;
2. Calls on the NSW Government to reinstate all of the above-mentioned facilities that have been cut from the plans for the Rozelle Parklands and writes to the NSW Premier, Minister for Transport and Minister for Public Spaces insisting upon this;
3. Restates Council’s unwillingness to take on care, control and management of the Rozelle Parklands until the Government has transparently disclosed the costs of the construction and ongoing repairs and maintenance through a Master Plan for the site;
4. Writes to residents in Rozelle, Lilyfield and Annandale notifying them of the Government’s cuts to facilities promised in the Rozelle Parklands and informing residents how they can advocate for the reinstatement of these facilities;
5. Hold a meeting with all relevant sporting clubs who made submissions in support of these facilities to recommence advocacy with them for the reinstatement of the facilities; and
6. Calls on the NSW Government for the filtration of the stacks.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, D'Arienzo, Drury, Howard, Lockie, Scott, Smith, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Crs Atkins, Da Cruz, Griffiths, Langford, Shetty and Stamolis |
Procedural Motion (Byrne/Stephens)
That Council allow Councillor Howard to speak for 1 additional minute on Item 68.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Against Motion: Nil
Procedural Motion (D’Arienzo/Howard)
That Council Suspend Standing Orders to bring forward the following items to be dealt with at this time:
1. Item 11 Defibrillators in Council Sporting Grounds;
2. Item 16 Post Exhibition - Model Code of Conduct;
3. Item 20 Minutes of the Audit, Risk and
Improvement Committee Meeting Held
on 17 August 2022;
4. Item 24 Mandatory Reporting of Fire Safety
Reports Referred to Council by Fire
and Rescue NSW;
5. Item 25 Community Wealth Building;
6. Item 29 Submission to the Local Government Remuneration Tribunal 2023;
7. Item 31 Statistical Report on Code of Conduct Complaints;
8. Item 40 Notice of Motion: Soft Plastics;
9. Item 43 Notice of Motion: Sydenham Road and Fitzroy Street, Marrickville;
10. Item 44 Notice of Motion: Campbell Street, St Peters;
11. Item 45 Notice of Motion: Transport for NSW Fail;
12. Item 46 Notice of Motion: Action on Community Safety;
13. Item 61 Procurement of Microsoft EA Licensing; and
14. Item 63 RFT 28-21 Pioneers Memorial Park Amenities Upgrade.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Against Motion: Nil
Procedural Motion (D’Arienzo/Howard)
That the following items be moved in globo and the recommendations contained within the report be adopted.
1. Item 11 Defibrillators in Council Sporting Grounds;
2. Item 16 Post Exhibition - Model Code of Conduct;
3. Item 20 Minutes of the Audit, Risk and
Improvement Committee Meeting Held
on 17 August 2022;
4. Item 24 Mandatory Reporting of Fire Safety
Reports Referred to Council by Fire
and Rescue NSW;
5. Item 25 Community Wealth Building;
6. Item 29 Submission to the Local Government Remuneration Tribunal 2023;
7. Item 31 Statistical Report on Code of Conduct Complaints;
8. Item 40 Notice of Motion: Soft Plastics;
9. Item 43 Notice of Motion: Sydenham Road and Fitzroy Street, Marrickville;
10. Item 44 Notice of Motion: Campbell Street, St Peters;
11. Item 45 Notice of Motion: Transport for NSW Fail;
12. Item 46 Notice of Motion: Action on Community Safety;
13. Item 61 Procurement of Microsoft EA Licensing; and
14. Item 63 RFT 28-21 Pioneers Memorial Park Amenities Upgrade.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Against Motion: Nil
|
That:
1. Council’s Sporting Ground Allocations Policy is updated as part of a formal review in 2023 to include a clause that all Sporting clubs and organisations (community and commercial) accessing Council sporting grounds must have operational Defibrillators (AEDs) in place by the winter sporting season in 2024;
2. Council promote the NSW Government Office of Sport 2023 Defibrillator grant program to both encourage and assist Inner West community clubs to apply for the grant;
3. Council note a program will commence to provide Defibrillators to the remaining Council operational buildings without defibrillators, the cost of this will form part of the consideration of the 2023-24 financial year budget; and
4. Council endorse participation in the NSW AED register being rolled out via Service NSW.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil |
|
That Council adopts the draft Model Code of Conduct in Attachment 1.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil |
|
That Council receive and note the report.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil |
|
That Council:
1. Notes the suspension of the soft plastic recycling program operated through major supermarkets by REDcycle;
2. Notes Australians use approximately 70 billion pieces of soft plastic each year, the vast majority of which is not recycled;
3. Investigates alternative soft plastics recycling programs that may be offered through Council’s Green Living Centre, the Summer Hill Reuse Centre, SSROC, existing partnerships including Recycle Smart, or opportunities to allow soft plastics to be collected in the kerbside recycling, such as the Curby program;
4. Continues to advocate strongly for a robust and sustainable circular economy, including the prevention and reduction of soft plastics use, including:
a) Producing a social media campaign to encourage consumers to refuse and reuse soft plastics and ways to eliminate soft plastic use, particularly while soft plastic recycling is suspended;
b) Supporting initiatives including Plastic Free July; and
c) Consulting with local organisations and resident groups to determine ways council can cooperate and support their work to reduce plastic use, intensify reuse and promote recycling.
5. Requests officers provide an urgent briefing note advising the likely impact on Council's waste services, including additional costs for landfill and detailing options for and limitations associated with the expansion of soft plastics recycling by local governments in NSW;
6. Writes to the CEOs of Woolworths and Coles conveying the concerns of inner west residents at the suspension and to request they urgently progress action to reduce the use of soft plastics at the source, resume soft plastics recycling and for take responsibility for product stewardship;
7. Writes to the Premier of NSW and the NSW Minister for Environment and Heritage seeking detailed information on how the NSW Government plans to meet its target for 100% of plastic packaging to be fully recyclable by 2025 and advocating for the implementation of a packaging stewardship scheme for soft plastics that sees the introduction of full cycle producer responsibility for packaging as a matter of urgency; and
8. When nominations open, nominate soft plastics be added to the Federal Government’s product stewardship priority list 2023-2024 under the Recycling and Waste Reduction Act (RaWE Act 2020).
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil |
|
That Council:
1. Calls on the NSW Minister for Roads immediately provide the long suffering residents of Milton Street Ashfield with a project update on the Georges River Road and Milton Street, Ashfield Intersection Upgrade with explanations for any variations in the published scope of the project;
2. Asks the Minister to
insist that more rigorous noise testing of any work done between 8pm and 5am
and improved noise attenuation; and 3. Requests that all Blackwood Avenue Ashfield be resurfaced by Transport for NSW due to the impact of the project and increased use of this Avenue by those working on the upgrade.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil |
|
That:
1. The contract for RFQ 156-22 Microsoft Enterprise Licensing be awarded to the recommended vendor as detailed in the confidential report; and
2. The General Manager be delegated authority to sign and execute the contract.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil |
Procedural Motion (Scott/Smith)
That Council further Suspend Standing Orders to bring forward Items 41 and 42 to be dealt with at this time.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Byrne, D'Arienzo, Drury, Howard, Scott, Smith, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Against Motion: Crs Atkins, Da Cruz, Griffiths, Langford, Lockie, Shetty and Stamolis
The Mayor, Councillor Byrne left the Meeting and vacated the chair at 9:53 pm. The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Scott assumed the chair.
|
C1222(1) Item 41 Notice of Motion: De-Amalgamation Risks |
|
That the EY Demerger Summary Risk Report, be included in the De-amalgamation Business Case.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Da Cruz, Drury, Griffiths , Howard, Scott, Smith, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Crs Atkins, D'Arienzo, Langford, Lockie, Shetty and Stamolis Absent: Cr Byrne |
The Mayor, Councillor Byrne returned to the Meeting at 10:00pm. The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Scott vacated the chair and the Mayor, Councillor Byrne assumed the chair.
Procedural Motion (Stephens/D’Arienzo)
That Council allow the Mayor, Councillor Byrne to speak for 1 additional minute to speak on Item 42.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Against Motion: Nil
|
That Council endorse the Annual Financial Statements to be placed on public exhibition with a view of tabling the final report at the next Council meeting, subject to updating Council’s Financial Statements to include the following note as requested by the Audit Office and recommended by the Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee on 6 December 2022 via circular resolution: Notes to the Financial Statements, Note A1.1, under the heading “Basis of preparation” A poll has been undertaken on a potential deamalgamation of the Council, a business case has been prepared, and Council has passed a resolution on 6 December 2022 to submit the business case to the Minister for Local Government and the Boundaries Commission for consideration and determination.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil |
The Mayor, Councillor Byrne left the Meeting and vacated the chair at 10:35 pm. The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Scott assumed the chair.
The Mayor, Councillor Byrne returned to the Meeting at 10:40 pm.
|
C1222(1) Item 6
Post Exhibition - Planning Proposal - Cyprus Club (58-76 Stanmore
|
|
That: 1. Council does not support the Planning Proposal – Cyprus Club, as exhibited, due to concerns raised by community, public agency and Council officers relating to traffic, built form and amenity impacts;
2. Council notes the matters raised in response to the public exhibition of Planning Proposal - Cyprus Club as detailed in Attachment 3;
3. Council request the Department of Planning & Environment to make post-exhibition changes to the Planning Proposal – Cyprus Club and defer the commencement of the Local Environmental Plan (LEP) to allow preparation of site-specific Development Control Plan (DCP) and Planning Agreement;
4. Subject to the Department of Planning and Environment’s agreement to defer the commencement of the LEP, Council supports the Planning Proposal – Cyprus Club, as amended in response to engagement outcomes, as outlined in this report;
5. Subject to point 4 above, Council forward the amended Planning Proposal – Cyprus Club to the Minister for Planning to make amendments to the Inner West LEP 2022 under Section 3.36 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979;
6. Subject to points 4 and 5 above, Council delegate the authority to the General Manager to make any minor amendments to the amended Planning Proposal – Cyprus Club to correct any minor errors, omissions or inconsistencies prior to finalisation; and
7. Council urgently progress preparation of the site-specific DCP and Planning Agreement.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil |
The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Scott vacated the chair and the Mayor, Councillor Byrne assumed the chair at 10.41pm.
Councillor Scott left the Meeting at 10:42 pm as she declared a significant, pecuniary interest in Item 9 Public Domain Master Plans as her residence appears in the public domain masterplan study area for the Norton Street and Marion Street precinct.
|
That a further report be provided to Council following the completion of the Visioning stage for each Public Domain Master Plan area.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil Absent: Cr Scott |
Councillor Scott returned to the Meeting at 10:43 pm.
|
That Council:
1. Adopt the King George Park Plan of Management as pursuant to Section 40 of the Local Government Act 1993 in accordance with 3.23(6) of the Crown Lands Management Act 2016; and
2. Note the upgrade to the King George Park Amenities Building will form part of the 2023-24 financial year budget considerations.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil |
Councillor D'Arienzo left the Meeting at 10:43 pm.
Councillor D'Arienzo returned to the Meeting at 10:45 pm.
Procedural Motion (Byrne/Scott)
That Council defer all remaining items to be considered at an Extraordinary Council meeting on Tuesday 13 December 2022 at 6.30pm at Ashfield Service Centre.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Against Motion: Nil
Meeting closed at 10.58pm
The following Items will be considered at the Extraordinary Council Meeting on 13 December 2022; Item 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 28, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 59, 60, 62 and 64.
Public Speakers:
|
Item #
|
Speaker |
Suburb |
|
Item 6
|
Helen Graham Andrew Costa Terry Bieri Matthew Daniel Terrence McGee |
Stanmore Stanmore Stanmore Caringbah Enmore |
|
Item 7 |
Tony Leung |
Sydney |
|
Item 12
|
Roberto Mayer Rene Holmes |
Stanmore Ashfield |
|
Item 19
|
Geoff Donnolley Adam Lockyer Jennifer Whitmarsh James Tweed David Keegan Jimmy Tang |
Rozelle Dulwich Hill Dulwich Hill Earlwood Rozelle Earlwood |
|
Item 35
|
Leslie Banton Julian Chambers |
Ashfield Lewisham |
|
Item 37 |
Andrew Chalk |
Ashfield |
|
Item 38 |
Michele Hacking |
Rozelle |
|
Item 41 |
Brian Halstead |
Spit Junction |
|
Item 42
|
Michele Hacking Pip Hinman Brian Halstead |
Rozelle Newtown Spit Junction |
|
Item 43 |
Mick Roche |
Chifley |
|
Item 48
|
Nick Deane Joyce Catanzariti James McGlone Karyn Hemming |
Marrickville Waterloo Redfern St Peters |
|
Item 49
|
Simone Wilkes Brian Keogh |
Dulwich Hill Earlwood |
|
Item 50 |
Jo Blackman Peter Olive Neil Tonkin |
Dulwich Hill Marrickville Lilyfield |
|
Item 51 |
Neil Tonkin |
Lilyfield |
|
Item 52
|
Adrian King Mark Skelsey Kylie Cochrane |
Marrickville Dulwich Hill Dulwich Hill |
|
Item 53
|
Ann Leahy Tori Quine |
Earlwood Marrickville |
|
Item 54 |
Ann Leahy |
Earlwood |
|
Item 55 |
Andrew Thomas |
Campsie |
The Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on the 6th day of December, 2022 were confirmed as a correct record on this 14th day of February 2023.
..............................................
CHAIRPERSON
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Minutes of Extraordinary Council Meeting held remotely and livestreamed on Council’s website on 13 December 2022
Meeting commenced at 6.01PM
|
Present: |
|
|
Darcy Byrne Philippa Scott Liz Atkins Marghanita Da Cruz Jessica D’Arienzo Mark Drury Dylan Griffiths Mathew Howard Justine Langford Pauline Lockie Kobi Shetty Chloe Smith John Stamolis Timothy Stephens Zoi Tsardoulias Simone Plummer |
Mayor Deputy Mayor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor (6.05pm) Councillor Councillor Councillor General Manager Director Planning |
|
Ryann Midei |
Director Infrastructure |
|
Ruth Callaghan Kelly Loveridge Beau-Jane De Costa Matthew Pearce Daryl Jackson |
Director Community Director Corporate Senior Manager Governance and Risk General Counsel Chief Financial Officer |
|
Katherine Paixao |
Business Paper Coordinator |
APOLOGIES: Nil
DISCLOSURES OF INTERESTS: Nil
Councillor Smith entered the meeting at 6.05pm.
Meeting closed at 6.18pm.
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Meeting commenced at 6.31PM
|
Present: |
|
|
Darcy Byrne Philippa Scott Liz Atkins Marghanita Da Cruz Jessica D’Arienzo Mark Drury Dylan Griffiths Mathew Howard Justine Langford Pauline Lockie Kobi Shetty Chloe Smith John Stamolis Timothy Stephens Zoi Tsardoulias Simone Plummer |
Mayor Deputy Mayor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor General Manager Director Planning |
|
Ryann Midei |
Director Infrastructure |
|
Ruth Callaghan Kelly Loveridge Beau-Jane De Costa Matthew Pearce Melanie Gurney Manod Wickramasinghe Scott Mullen Daryl Jackson Luke Murtas Ian McCann Erin White |
Director Community Director Corporate Senior Manager Governance and Risk General Counsel Senior Manager Customer Expiernace and Service Transformation Manager Traffic and Transport Services Manager Strategic Investments and Property Chief Financial Officer Senior Manager Environment and Sustainability Senior Manager Operations Manager Resource Recovery and Fleet Services |
|
Katherine Paixao |
Business Paper Coordinator |
APOLOGIES: Nil
DISCLOSURES OF INTERESTS:
Clr Howard declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 6 Local Traffic Committee Meeting – 21 November 2022 as he works in the Office of the State Member for Summer Hill who has a representative on the Local Traffic Committee. He will remain and participate in the meeting for discussion and voting as the vote of the State Member is exercised through a representative.
Clr Langford declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 28 Notice of Motion: Natural area restoration opportunity as she lives near the site that has been identified and she is of the opinion that it would not add any value to her property and therefore she will stay in the meeting for discussion and voting on this item.
Clr Scott declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 4 IWC Sporting Ground Condition Report as she is the President of Sydney Secondary College (SSC) P&C. The SSC Oval is a shared sporting ground with Inner West Council and is in the portfolio of sporting groups which are subject to the condition report and upgrade program. The program is general to all sporting grounds and not specific to SSC, therefore she will stay in the meeting for discussion and voting on this item.
Clr Scott declared a significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 22 Notice of Motion: Leichhardt Tramsheds as she is the President of Sydney Secondary College P&C. The neglect of the Leichhardt Tramsheds has been of significant detriment to SSC. Any change to its use would be of benefit to the school. She will exit the chamber during discussion and voting of the item.
Motion: (D’Arienzo/Tsardoulias)
That Council note the disclosures of interest.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Against Motion: Nil
PUBLIC FORUM
The registered speaker was asked to address the meeting. The speakers list is available on the last page of these minutes.
|
That Council adopts the amendments to the Community Engagement Strategy 2022-24 section of the Community Engagement Framework as outlined in the report, with the following changes:
a) Insert the policy challenges set for each Local Democracy Group;
b) Amend Your Say Inner West Customer Service stalls from monthly to fortnightly; and
c) Include in the Priorities for 2022-24 a citizen’s jury as a deliberative engagement process to be held in 2023.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil
Amendment (Da Cruz/Atkins)
That Council ensure the accessibility of online communication including provision of multilingual/script Information and how to access interpreter and alternate ways to online for accessing information and making submissions
Motion Lost For Motion: Crs Atkins, Da Cruz, Griffiths, Langford, Lockie, Shetty and Stamolis Against Motion: Crs Byrne, D'Arienzo, Drury, Howard, Scott, Smith, Stephens and Tsardoulias |
|
That Council:
1. Increase the provision of customer service stalls to once per fortnight through 2023; and
2. Staff undertake broad community consultation, undertaken in house to solicit as many ideas and as much feedback as possible in advance of drafting the Community Service Charter.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Cr Da Cruz
Amendment (Da Cruz/Stamolis)
That Council align community engagement with customer service stalls.
Motion Lost For Motion: Crs Atkins, Da Cruz, Griffiths, Langford, Shetty and Stamolis Against Motion: Crs Byrne, D'Arienzo, Drury, Howard, Lockie, Scott, Smith, Stephens and Tsardoulias |
The Mayor, Councillor Byrne left the Meeting and vacated the chair at 7:01 pm. The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Scott assumed the chair.
|
That Council:
1. Confirms that the outcomes and deliverables of the Henson Park Grandstand Redevelopment Project as outlined in the Henson Park PPP Final Assessment are acceptable;
2. Continue to proceed with the Henson Park Grandstand Redevelopment Project as a Public Private Partnership with the AFL (NSW/ACT) Commission Limited;
3. Authorise the General Manager to:
a) certify that all documentation, as part of the Henson Park Grandstand Redevelopment Project, has been prepared in accordance with the Public Private Partnership Guidelines 2022; and
b) submit all documentation to the Office of Local Government for assessment of the Henson Park Grandstand Redevelopment Project as a Public Private Partnership.
4. Delegate to the General Manager the authority to execute a Heads of Agreement with the commercial terms.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Cr Da Cruz Absent: Cr Byrne |
The Mayor, Councillor Byrne returned to the Meeting at 7:38 pm. The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Scott vacated the chair and the Mayor, Councillor Byrne assumed the chair
|
C1222(2) Item 8 Outcomes of Local Matters Forums and customer service stalls |
|
That Council hold another 10 public matters forums in 2023, excluding the January and July recess periods.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil |
|
That:
1.
Council receive
and note the report; 2.
Council receive a
bi-monthly report on the Arts Summit - Update and Progress, commencing from
the March 2023 Ordinary Council meeting; and 3. Noting the resolution of Council on 13 September 2022 that the Inner West Council Arts and Music Recovery Plan be tabled at the December Ordinary Council meeting, and that this has not occurred, commit to the Plan being tabled at the February 2023 Ordinary Council meeting.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil |
|
That:
1. A further report be provided by March 2023 for Council’s consideration following completion of an analysis of appropriate locations, designs and costs for the large scale “little villages” signs;
2. Upon provision of a cost estimate being provided to Council, this will form part of the budget consideration for 2023-24 financial year;
3. Inform Google and any other relevant agencies and companies of the designation of local precincts as “little villages” and request they incorporate these names into online maps, making the precincts searchable online; and
4. Publish a page for each of the “little villages” on the Inner West Council website, highlighting and celebrating their significance and features, including the geographical, historical and social context of each.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil
Amendment (Da Cruz/Atkins)
That the signage be provided in multiple languages (including braille) and include short stories relevant to the little villages.
Motion Lost For Motion: Crs Atkins, Da Cruz, Griffiths, Langford, Shetty and Stamolis Against Motion: Crs Byrne, D'Arienzo, Drury, Howard, Lockie, Scott, Smith, Stephens and Tsardoulias |
|
That Council receive and note the report.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil |
|
That Council:
1. Receive and note the report;
2. Work with the Marrickville Town Hall Steering Committee to host an Open Day no later than February 2023, inviting local artists, creative organisations and entities, and organisations working in multicultural performance to tour the Hall, provide valuable feedback and ideas about possible creative uses, and learn more about Council’s plan for the venue;
3. Use this Open Day as a model for similar open days to be held at all other town halls no later than March 2023;
4. Include an Open Day at Newtown Town Hall, including an information session for LGBTQ+ organisations, as part of World Pride 2023;
5. Report to Council about progress in the activation of Town Halls in February 2023, and then bi-monthly (April, June, August, October, December 2023);
6. Immediately promote the Expression of Interest - Creative Use of Council Venues on all Council channels, including the next newsletter, on social media and other channels, by letter to all creative organisations and individuals within the Local Government Area and to all those who have applied for Council grants or engaged with the Arts Summit process; and
7. Include an update and analysis on the Expression of Interest - Creative Use of Council Venues process as part of the February 2023 Report.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil
Amendment (Da Cruz) That Council investigate operating a regular "Wheelie Bag" markets in our town halls along the lines of Singapore's Luggage Market. This amendment lapsed for want of seconder. |
|
That Council receive and note the report.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil |
|
That Council:
1. Receive and note the report; and
2. Receive a report on the roll out of the Public Spaces (Unattended Property) Act 2021 in March 2023.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil |
|
C1222(2) Item 15 Notice of Motion: Land and Property Register |
|
That Council to provide an update as to when the Land and Property Register will be updated and published.
The Mayor ruled this motion redundant as the information has been provided in the officers comment. |
|
That Council: 1. Conduct a Heritage Forum in the first half of 2023 to which key staff, councillors, community organisations and interested residents will be invited, with a view to identifying issues relating to heritage policy, management and conservation including risks to heritage in the Inner West;
2. Note that bi-monthly heritage advisory committees were well attended at Leichhardt Council;
3. Note that Planning and Local History issues relating to Heritage were presented by Officers and discussed with the community;
4. Note there are several Heritage Groups in the Inner West in Haberfield, Ashfield, Marrickville and Balmain and that a Forum in 2018 brought them together at Balmain; and
5. Note that Heritage and History is of significant interest to our community and include a regular column in our printed newsletter.
Motion Lost For Motion: Crs Atkins, Da Cruz, Langford, Lockie, Shetty and Stamolis Against Motion: Crs Byrne, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Scott, Smith, Stephens and Tsardoulias |
|
C1222(2) Item 17 Notice of Motion: Gambling Harm Minimisation |
|
That Council:
1. Write to the Premier of NSW and the Leader of the NSW Opposition supporting calls for a broad scale trial of cashless gaming and harm reduction payment systems for electronic gaming machines;
2. Continue to annually apply to the Office of Responsible Gambling for at least one grant a year for a harm minimisation project designed in consultation with the Inner West community;
3. Continue an annual Gambling Harm Minimisation Roundtable, open to the public, one focus of which is to develop a community education and awareness campaign in regard to gambling harm minimisation, to be co-chaired by Councillors Atkins and Lockie; and
4. Commend and publicise all pubs and clubs in the Inner West that are proudly pokies free, including – but not limited to – the Pratten Park Bowling Club, the Concordia Club, Crowbar Leichhardt, the Duke Enmore, the Annandale Hotel, the Petersham Bowling Club, Carlisle Castle Hotel and The Henson.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil
Amendment (Drury/Scott)
That point 1 be amended to ‘That Council write to the Premier of NSW and the Leader of the NSW Opposition supporting calls for a broad scale trial of cashless gaming and harm reduction payment systems for electronic gaming machines.’
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, D'Arienzo, Drury, Howard, Scott, Smith, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Crs Atkins, Da Cruz, Griffiths, Langford, Lockie, Shetty and Stamolis
As this amendment was carried, it was incorporated into the primary motion. |
|
C1222(2) Item 18 Notice
of Motion: Congratulate Boomali Aboriginal Artists |
|
That Council write to the artists of Boomalli Aboriginal Artists Cooperative congratulating them on their contribution to culture in Leichhardt, the Inner West and beyond.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil |
|
C1222(2) Item 19 Notice of Motion: Development of Flood Plains |
|
That Council:
1. Acknowledges the serious risk that flooding presents to communities in an era of changing climate;
2. Fully supports the measures already incorporated into IWC plans and strategies to protect communities in the Inner West from flooding risks, especially through the diligent application of those measures in planning decisions; and
3. Not support any planning proposal which has the effect of significantly increasing residential density in mapped flood planning areas.
The Mayor ruled point 3 of the motion out of order as it is inconsistent with the exemptions allowed in the ministerial directions and also ruled points 1 and 2 redundant as council does not need to move a motion to support the measures already incorporated into Inner West Council plans and strategies.
Procedural Motion (Da Cruz/Stamolis)
That a motion of dissent be raised regarding the Chairperson’s ruling.
Motion Lost For Motion: Crs Da Cruz, Langford and Stamolis Against Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stephens and Tsardoulias |
|
C1222(2) Item 20 Notice
of Motion: Demerger Submission must reflect vote of the |
|
That Council:
1. Note the resounding poll result of the Inner West community for “YES to demerge and to restore the three original Councils” which was conducted one year ago;
2. Note that NSW Government has legislated funding for council demergers;
3. Note that the original expectations for savings and an improved budget position of the merged council have not been realised;
4. Note the concerns which have been expressed by community about Councils draft submission, in particular, that Council have not produced a case for demerger;
5. Note the lack of any expert review of Councils draft submission;
6. Revise and improve its draft submission by consulting the community and local government experts in order to prepare a proper ‘demerger submission’ and transition plan to restore the three previous Councils; and
7. Revise and improve its draft submission by consulting the community and local government experts in order to prepare a proper ‘demerger submission’ and transition plan to restore the three previous Councils.
The Mayor ruled this out of order as Council has already resolved to submit the demerger business case and the motion has been enacted. |
|
C1222(2) Item 21 Notice of Motion: Screening the 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup |
|
That Council: 1. Note that the FIFA Women's World Cup will be hosted by Australia and New Zealand, and is scheduled to take place from 20 July to 20 August 2023;
2. Note that while the opening game is scheduled to be held in New Zealand, the final is scheduled to be held in Sydney;
3. Note the success of the recent World Cup screening of Australia v Tunisia in Lackey Square, Summer Hill. The event brought hundreds of residents together and was economic success for local businesses; and
4. Commit to holding public screenings of Matildas games during the 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup in the Inner West, including at Henson Park, Leichhardt Oval, and Pratten Park, pending availability, and identify funding sources for this.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil |
The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Scott left the Meeting at 8:55 pm as she declared a significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 22 Notice of Motion: Leichhardt Tramsheds as she is the President of Sydney Secondary College P&C. The neglect of the Leichhardt Tramsheds has been of significant detriment to SSC. Any change to its use would be of benefit to the school.
|
C1222(2) Item 22 Notice of Motion: Leichhardt Tramsheds Car Park |
|
That:
1. Council notes that the Leichhardt Tramsheds have been in a disused state for over 50 years;
2. Council notes that while no actual progress on developing the Leichhardt Tramsheds site has been made, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the state agency, Property NSW, that owns the site and Sydney Secondary College allows the College staff to use one part of the Tramsheds as a carpark during school hours (Monday to Friday, 9am-3pm);
3. Council writes to the Planning Minister, Anthony Roberts to request that a further MOU be developed between the state agency and Inner West Council to share use of the existing carpark by operating it as a free Council carpark after hours during the week and on weekends for the benefit of local businesses;
4. If such a MOU is arranged, support local businesses with signage and other decorative wayfinding from the existing carpark to Norton Street businesses; and
5. Prior to Council undertaking any advocacy to change the current use of the carpark, they formally consult with Sydney Secondary College and the Teacher's Federation to determine their views and potential unforeseen impacts of the proposed changes.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil Absent: Cr Scott |
The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Scott returned to the Meeting at 9:00 pm.
|
C1222(2) Item 23 Notice of Motion: Bring Julian home; drop the charges |
|
That Council:
1. Writes to the President of the United States, Joe Biden, expressing Council’s desires that President Biden:
a) show clemency by intervening in the extradition and prosecution of Mr Assange; and
b) instruct the US Attorney-General and the US Department of Justice to withdraw all charges on medical and humanitarian grounds;
2. Writes to the Prime Minister of Australia, the Right Honourable Anthony Albanese, and to Minister for Foreign Affairs, the Honourable Senator Penny Wong, requesting them to write to the President of the United States and to the US Ambassador to Australia, Ms Caroline Kennedy, expressing Australia’s concerns regarding Mr Assange’s prosecution.
Motion Lost For Motion: Crs Atkins, Da Cruz, Griffiths, Langford, Lockie, Shetty and Stamolis Against Motion: Crs Byrne, D'Arienzo, Drury, Howard, Scott, Smith, Stephens and Tsardoulias |
|
C1222(2) Item 24 Notice of Motion: Cooks River Community Call for Action |
|
That Council:
1. Note the Cooks River – A Community Call for Real Action letter submitted by the Cooks River Community Collective (CRCC) to Cooks River Stakeholders, including Inner West Council, seeking support and a call for action for better outcomes for the Cooks River;
2. Give in principal support to the actions and objectives proposed by the CRCC, noting the timeline for completion of 1 November 2023;
3. Note that the CRCC represents various community groups with a strong interest in the Cooks River and catchment. These groups include the River Canoe Club, Cooks River Valley Association, The Mudcrabs, Canterbury Racecourse Action Group, Wolli Creek Preservation Society, Marrickville Golf Sporting and Community Club, The Crab Walkers and Cooks River Initiative to Transform the Riverbank;
4. Host a round-table discussion with key representatives of the Cooks River Community Collective and other Cooks River stakeholders, such as the Cooks River Alliance, Sydney Water and Canterbury Bankstown Council in early 2023 to discuss how the CRCC objectives might be achieved and funded within the nominated timeframe;
5. Investigate how the CRCC actions fit into the Inner West Council’s Cooks River Corridor Masterplan, the Cooks River Alliance Strategic Plan 2022-2025 and other relevant strategies; and
6. Request a report be presented back to the next available Council meeting, following finalisation of the draft Cooks River Alliance Strategy which outlines what opportunities there are for Inner West Council to directly take steps to positively contribute to the actions requested by the CRCC.
Motion Lost For Motion: Crs Atkins, Da Cruz, Griffiths, Langford, Shetty and Stamolis Against Motion: Crs Byrne, D'Arienzo, Drury, Howard, Lockie, Scott, Smith, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Foreshadowed Motion (Byrne/Drury)
That Council request that the Cooks River Alliance submit a copy of the final strategy for consideration of Council staff and councillors.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil |
Procedural Motion (Byrne/Howard)
That the meeting be adjourned for 5 minutes.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Against Motion: Nil
The meeting was adjourned at 9.22pm
The meeting recommenced at 9.28pm
|
C1222(2) Item 25 Notice of Motion: GreenWay Funding Guarantee |
|
That Council:
1. Writes to the NSW Premier, Dominic Perrotet; the Minister for Transport David Elliot; the NSW Opposition Leader, Chris Minns and Shadow Minister for Transport, Jo Haylen, calling on them to commit to fast-track funding, to be spent in the next term of State government, to enable the construction of the current GreenWay “long term” underpass works at Old Canterbury Road, redefining the underpass as “short term” works. This would allow the underpass to be completed at the same time as other proposed short-term underpass works within the corridor;
2. Investigates options for habitat offset to compensate for any areas that are impacted by the underpass works under Old Canterbury Road; and
3. Includes bicycle speed mitigation measures along the GreenWay to ensure the path is safe for pedestrians and cyclists.
Motion Lost For Motion: Crs Atkins, Da Cruz, Griffiths, Langford, Shetty and Stamolis Against Motion: Crs Byrne, D'Arienzo, Drury, Howard, Lockie, Scott, Smith, Stephens and Tsardoulias |
|
C1222(2) Item 26 Notice
of Motion: Livingstone Road Cycle Way upgrades and |
|
That Council:
1. Make urgent safety upgrades and improvements to the Livingstone Road Cycle Way (Local Route 3) as identified by Council staff and representatives of Bike Marrickville and the Inner West Bicycle Coalition;
2. Investigates funding options to pay for the completion of important
upgrades and safety improvements to the Livingstone Road Cycle Way (Local Route 3) that cannot be funded out of the
existing operational budget; and 3. Reports back to Council by 1 March 2023 about the funding and timing of the proposed upgrades.
Motion Lost For Motion: Crs Atkins, Da Cruz, Griffiths, Langford, Lockie, Shetty and Stamolis Against Motion: Crs Byrne, D'Arienzo, Drury, Howard, Scott, Smith, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Foreshadowed Motion (Howard/Byrne)
That Council:
1. Undertake and table a review of the Livingstone Road Cycle Way at the Local Traffic Committee that responds to concerns that have been raised by Bike Marrickville, the Inner West Bicycle Coalition, and residents, and ensure the review details learnings from the project and lists possible areas for improvement;
2. In the meantime, undertake any minor works identified by staff to improve pedestrian and cyclist safety, including improvements to signage and line markings; and
3. Include as part of the review costs associated with any future potential improvement works, including options for funding sources.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil |
|
C1222(2) Item 27 Notice
of Motion: Exclusion from the Low Rise Housing Diversity |
|
That Council:
1. Notes that the NSW Government Complying Development SEPP, including the Low-Rise Housing Diversity Code, is increasingly resulting in the construction of new development projects that do not integrate with the Inner West's historic streetscapes, demolish existing character homes and have other negative planning impacts;
2.
Notes that interim heritage orders,
heritage conservation areas and the listing of individual heritage items are
needed to switch off this code. These are significant and unfunded activities
for Council to undertake; 3. Requests that by March 2023, Council staff prepare a report outlining:
a) Statistics by ward on all Complying Development Certificates approved under the Complying Development SEPPs, including the Low Rise Housing Diversity Code, showing the number of times they have been used for the demolition of existing homes to build new homes in the local government area since 2018;
b)
Intensity mapping or similar to
highlight geographic areas of concern and concentration where the Complying
Development SEPP has been used; and c) Options for the Council to seek an exemption from the Complying Development SEPP in relation to the demolition of existing homes or building of new homes, or to otherwise limit the unwanted legacies of Complying Development.
4. Write to the NSW Premier, Dominic Perrotet; the Minister for Planning and Homes, Anthony Roberts; the Minister for the Environment and Heritage, James Griffin; the NSW State Opposition Leader, Chris Minns and Shadow Minister for Planning and Public Spaces, Paul Scully asking them to commit to exclude the Inner West Council local government area from the provisions of the Low-Rise Housing Diversity Code, State Environmental Planning Policies (SEPP).
Motion Lost For Motion: Crs Atkins, Da Cruz, Langford, Lockie, Shetty and Stamolis Against Motion: Crs Byrne, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Scott, Smith, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Foreshadowed Motion (D’Arienzo/Drury)
That Council receive a report outlining the uptake of new dwellings and the areas in the Inner West Local Government Area that permits fast tracked complying development under the Low-Rise Housing Diversity Code and the State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 (Codes SEPP).
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil |
|
C1222(2) Item 28 Notice of Motion: Natural area restoration opportunity |
|
That Council Investigate the best way to restore and develop a natural area in the triangle of land at Marrickville Golf Course, located between Chadwick Avenue and Alfred Street, Marrickville, uphill of Tee 17. This site has great potential for rewilding with native plants, a bushtucker garden, creation of wildlife habitat and restorative landscaping to create pathways and places to sit for quiet contemplation.
Motion Lost For Motion: Crs Atkins, Da Cruz, Griffiths, Langford, Lockie, Shetty and Stamolis Against Motion: Crs Byrne, D'Arienzo, Drury, Howard, Scott, Smith, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Foreshadowed Motion (Byrne/Howard)
That the Mayor and General Manager meet with Marrickville Golf Club to discuss the implementation of environmental and other components of the Marrickville Golf Course Master Plan with the outcomes of the meeting to be reported to a subsequent Council meeting.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil
Amendment (Griffiths/Stamolis)
That Clr Langford be involved in the meeting with the Mayor and General Manager.
Motion Lost For Motion: Crs Atkins, Da Cruz, Griffiths, Langford, Lockie, Shetty and Stamolis Against Motion: Crs Byrne, D'Arienzo, Drury, Howard, Scott, Smith, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Amendment (Langford/Shetty)
That all Marrickville Ward councillors be included in the meeting.
Motion Lost For Motion: Crs Atkins, Da Cruz, Griffiths, Langford, Lockie, Shetty and Stamolis Against Motion: Crs Byrne, D'Arienzo, Drury, Howard, Scott, Smith, Stephens and Tsardoulias |
|
C1222(2) Item 29 Notice of Motion: Cooks River federal election funding promise |
|
That Council write to Prime Minister, Hon Anthony Albanese, Federal Minister, Hon Tony Burke MP, Hon Tanya Plibersek MP, Minister for the Environment and Water and the Hon Penny Sharpe MLC, Shadow Minister for the Environment to seek a meeting about the Urban Rivers and Catchments Program funding which allocated $10 million dollars to regenerating the Cooks River and to ask when this funding will be available and how Council can apply.
Motion Lost For Motion: Crs Atkins, Da Cruz, Griffiths, Langford, Lockie, Shetty and Stamolis Against Motion: Crs Byrne, D'Arienzo, Drury, Howard, Scott, Smith, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Foreshadowed Motion (Byrne/Drury) That Council:
1. Note that Federal Labor was the only party to make an election funding commitment for the rehabilitation of the Cooks River; and
2. Note that Council has written to Minister Plibersek seeking her collaboration on the rehabilitation of the Cooks River.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, D'Arienzo, Drury, Howard, Scott, Smith, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Crs Atkins, Da Cruz, Griffiths, Langford, Lockie, Shetty and Stamolis |
|
C1222(2) Item 30 Notice
of Motion: Cooks River Alliance Strategic Plan 2022 - |
|
That Council: 1. Give in-principal support to the Cooks River Alliance Strategic Plan 2022 – 2025 (final draft); and 2. Begin to seek to identify funds and resources to support the Strategic Plan to meet the key objectives. (NB: Not all objectives in the plan have funding and resources assigned). Motion Lost For Motion: Crs Atkins, Da Cruz, Griffiths, Langford, Shetty and Stamolis Against Motion: Crs Byrne, D'Arienzo, Drury, Howard, Lockie, Scott, Smith, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Foreshadowed Motion (Byrne/Drury)
That the final Cooks River Alliance Strategic Plan 2022 – 2025 be submitted to Council.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Cr Da Cruz |
Procedural Motion (Drury/Scott)
That Council enter into Confidential session.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Against Motion: Nil
Confidential Session
That in accordance with Section 10A(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, the following matters be considered in Closed Session of Council for the reasons provided:
C1222(2) Item 31 Update on Acquisition of Investment Properties (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business and (Section 10A(2)(d)(ii) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the council.
C1222(2) Item 32 Summer Hill Reuse Centre – Update (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
C1222(2) Item 33 Potential Expansion of In- House Resource Recovery Collection Services (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business and (Section 10A(2)(d)(ii) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the council.
C1222(2) Item 34 Food and Garden Organics - Earlier Commencement Date (Section 10A(2)(d)(ii) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the council.
Procedural Motion (Howard/Scott)
That Council move back into the Open Session of the Council Meeting.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Against Motion: Nil
resolutions passed during closed session
|
C1222(2) Item 31 Update on Acquisition of Investment Properties |
|
That Council receive and note the report.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil |
|
That Council defer this item to the February 2023 Ordinary Council meeting.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil
Amendment (Da Cruz) That Council:
1. Approves further discussions with other interested parties who did not provide a submission to the EOI, and have subsequently contacted Council, to occupy any remaining space for the purpose of repair, reuse and recycling;
2. Investigate providing an E-Waste collection point - this may be through the Bower or Village Project;
3. Note the significant contribution of centres such as at Summer Hill to the Circular Economy and that we write to the federal and state Environment Ministers inviting them to share the cost to council on a 33/33/33 on an ongoing basis; and
4. Develop research partnerships including with the Product Stewardship Centre of Excellence at UTS.
This motion lapsed for want of seconder. |
Procedural Motion (Scott/Howard)
That the meeting be extended until 11.10 minutes.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Against Motion: Nil
|
C1222(2)
Item 33 Potential Expansion of In- House
Resource Recovery Collection |
|
That Council:
1. Support tendering for a single collection contract across the Local Government Area commencing 3 April 2024 as per the following nominated contract collection services for each area:
a) North Service Area (Leichhardt) – Recycling; b) West Service Area (Ashfield) - Garbage, Recycling, Green Waste; and c) South Service Area (Marrickville) - Recycling
2. Endorse the extension of the existing Cleanaway collection contract for the West Service Area from 16 December 2023 to 31 March 2024, through an existing option in the contract;
3. Resolves pursuant to section 55(3)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 to: a) extend the United Resource Management (URM) Contract for the North Service Area from 1 July 2023 to 31 March 2024; and
b) run a select Request for Tender (RFT) with Council’s existing recycling collection contractors URM and Cleanaway for the South Service Area from 1 July 2023 to 31 March 2024,
without the
calling of open tenders as it considers that a satisfactory result
i. the cost and uncertainly of running two RFT’s for 9 month contract periods is contrary to usual practice for waste collection contracts;
ii.
URM and Cleanaway have previously won
competitive tender processes and have been undertaking waste collection
services for council since 1 July 2016 and 16 December 2018 respectively; and iii. desire to run a tender for a single waste collection contract (for nominated waste and recycling collection services) across the Local Government Area commencing 3 April 2024.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil
Amendment (Da Cruz)
That Council develop bin identification and communication including the App and Online which aligns with Disposal, Australian Package Labelling Standards and this be consistent across our kerbside, street, parks, community centres, libraries, swimming pools, internally including events and service centre waste collection.
This amendment lapsed for want of seconder. |
Procedural Motion (Scott/Atkins)
That the meeting be extended until 11.15pm.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Against Motion: Nil
Procedural Motion (Byrne/Lockie)
That the meeting be extended until 11.20pm.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias
Against Motion: Nil
|
C1222(2) Item 34 Food and Garden Organics - Earlier Commencement Date |
|
That Council:
1. Delegate the General Manager authority to enter into the Deed of Variation to Inner West Council’s current contract with Veolia, and any minor amendments to that Deed, to ensure the commencement of Council’s Food and Garden Organics service in 2023; and
2. Be advised on the execution of deed and the matter be reported back to the next available Council meeting.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Byrne, Da Cruz, D'Arienzo, Drury, Griffiths, Howard, Langford, Lockie, Scott, Shetty, Smith, Stamolis, Stephens and Tsardoulias Against Motion: Nil
Amendment (Da Cruz) 1. That Council: 2. 1. Write to the relevant State and Federal Ministers to look at the issue of diverting Fibre-based materials, such as bamboo, timber or cardboard packaging and cutlery, paper towels and serviettes as well as Compostable or biodegradable plastic products or bags from the landfill and composting streams. Noting that businesses are switching to these products under NSW State Regulation; and
2. Inform the community through our newsletter of the issue of disposal of these items and encourage the use of reusable cuttlery, crockery and glassware.
The Mayor ruled this amendment out of order as it does not relate to the motion. |
Meeting closed at 11.16pm.
Public Speakers:
|
Item #
|
Speaker |
Suburb |
|
Item 6: |
Jimmy Tang |
Earlwood |
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: December Quarterly Budget Reporting Statement, and Delivery Program 2022-26 and Operational Plan 2022-23 - Quarter Two Report
Prepared By: Chris Sleiman - Financial Partnering & Analytics Manager and Prue Foreman - Corporate Strategy and Engagement Manager
Authorised By: Peter Gainsford - General Manager
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopt the Second Quarter Budget Review for 2022-23.
|
DISCUSSION
This report contains the Quarterly Budget Review Statement and second quarter report against the Delivery Program 2022-26 and Operational Plan 2022/23.
Quarterly Budget Review Statement
The Quarterly Budget Review Statement is a regular progress report prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Local Government Act 1993 (s404(5)) and Local Government Regulation 2004 (Cl203(2)), namely that the Responsible Accounting Officer report quarterly on a budget review statement to adequately disclose the Council’s overall financial position.
This report provides a comprehensive high-level overview of Council’s financial position as at 31 December 2022. Any forecast results are projections as at 30 June 2023. Council has updated its projected budget result to $22.8 million, this is a decrease of $0.2 million from the 2022/23 September Budget. Excluding capital revenue, a deficit of $1.6 million has been projected against the 2022/23 September Budget Deficit of $1.3 million.
During the quarter, a detailed review of both operating and capital budgets have been undertaken reconfirming the budget projections for the current financial year.
The change in the Full Year Operating Budgeted Result Before Capital Grants and Contributions is predominantly due to:
· Interest Income increase of $2.5m due to RBA increasing interest rates resulting in higher returns on investments.
· Other Income decrease of $1.8m to reflect year to date actuals for parking infringements and reduction in forecast rental income from purchase of investment properties.
· Operating Grants and Contributions increased by $0.7m mainly to reflect year to date grants received by Council for Early Learning.
· Employee Costs net decrease following realignment of budget to agency costs in Materials and Services for backfilling permanent roles.
· Material & Services net increase due to:
o Legal costs increase to match year to date spend on legal matters.
o Including outgoing costs for investment property purchase (offset by revenue to be received for outgoings).
o Reclassification of some capital projects to operational due to the nature of works.
o Inclusion of budget for the Leichhardt Oval Masterplan.
Summary of Budget Movements
Operational Budget
The graph in Figure 1 summarises the key operating budget movements, with a brief explanation and the impact on Council’s budget provided below.
Figure 1. Changes in the Full Year Operating Budgeted Result Before Capital Grants and Contributions
- Forecast decrease in revenue relating to User Charges & Fees:
· Early Learning Services - $0.8m decrease offset by $0.6m increase from operating grants.
· Engineering Services – $0.4m increase to reflect year to date results in hoarding rental, road opening permits and construction zone charges.
- Forecast increase in Domestic Waste Charge $0.1m – reflect households utilising Council waste services for 2022/23 financial year.
- Forecast decrease in Other Income:
· Parking & Ranger Services - $1.5m to reflect year to dates results for parking infringements.
· Properties & Strategic Investments - $0.2m to reflect a reduction of expected rental income from the purchase of investment properties.
· Environmental Health & Building Regulation - $0.4m to reflect year to date results for Certificates of Outstanding Notices.
- Forecast increase in Interest Income $2.5m – reflects RBA increasing interest rates resulting in higher returns on investments.
- Forecast decrease in Employment Costs:
· result of realigning budget to agency costs in Materials and Services for backfilling permanent roles.
- Forecast increase in Materials and Services:
· Increase in legal costs to reflect year to date costs for legal matters and reclassification of capital projects to operational due to the nature of works.
Capital Budget
The graph in Figure 2 reflects changes in the timing of projects, with a brief explanation provided below. Details can be found within the December 2022 QBRS Movement (attached).
Figure 2. Changes in the Full Year Capital Budget including Capital Grants and Contributions
- Decreased Capital Expenditure of $6.1m is primarily due to realigning the following projects to next financial year:
· Paringa Reserve Elliot St New Kiosk
· Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Major Project
· Sydenham Cycleway WestConnex
Cash Flow forecasts of major projects will be monitored ensuring the expenditure remains in line with the budget. December 2022 year to date capital expenditure totals approximately $26.0m.
The Capital Budget will be reviewed throughout the financial year on an ongoing basis with the capital works managers. Changes to the Capital Works will be brought to Council through future QBRS.
Responsible Accounting Officer Budget Review Statement
Section 203(2) of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021 requires a report by Council’s responsible accounting officer regarding the Council’s financial position at the end of each quarter. The following statement is made in accordance with this clause.
“It is in my opinion that the Budget Review Statement for Inner West Council for the period ending 31 December 2022 indicates that Council’s projected financial position at 30 June will be satisfactory, having regard to the projected estimates of income and expenditure and the original budgeted income and expenditure.”
Daryl Jackson, Chief Financial Officer (Responsible Accounting Officer)
- Inner West Council
Delivery Program 2022-26 and Operational Plan 2022/23 - Quarter two Report
In June 2022, Inner West Council adopted its new Delivery Program 2022-26 and Operational Plan 2022/23. The plan outlines how Council will deliver services and infrastructure for the benefit of the Inner West community, as guided by the Community Strategic Plan – Our Inner West 2036.
The attached report shows progress against the plan during the quarter from 1 October – 31 December 2022.
Highlights
There are 174 actions in total in the Operational Plan 2022/23, of which 12 were completed in the previous quarter.
Of the remaining 162 actions:
· 90% of actions were ‘Completed’ or are ‘On Track’
· 10% of actions are ‘Behind Schedule’, ‘On Hold’ or ‘Rescheduled’
All actions status
Actions by strategic direction status
The report contains commentary about progress on each of the actions and key measures against performance targets.
The report also contains detailed progress of measures against performance targets.
Highlights from the quarter include:
· The Summer Hill Reuse Centre on-site works are predominantly complete
· Preliminary investigations were undertaken in relation to the Callan Park Swim site
· The draft Electric Vehicle Encouragement Strategy and Verge Garden Policy were placed on public exhibition
· The consolidated development Contributions Plan for the Inner West was adopted
· The Main Street Strategy scoping was completed
· Over 100 artists, 190 organisations including community and businesses, and 145 creative participants delivered work through the events programs during the quarter
· Some of the 16 events / activations during the period that were held included: Marrickville Music Festival, St Anmore Music Festival, Norton St Festa, Carols on Norton, World Cup live sites, Balmain New Year's Eve, Inner West Festive Grants program, Little Vietnam Launch, Oxi Day celebrations
· There were up to 70 activations under the Pop-Up Music Marathon across the LGA working with venues, artists and stakeholders
· An Arts and Music Summit was held to identify key issues affecting performers, artists and arts-based businesses and identify potential solutions
· Two guided Creative Trail studio tours and one Perfect Match street art tour were attended by 60 people during the quarter
· The naming of Pride Square was gazetted and adopted by the Minister in November 2022 with 11 successful community projects funded by Council for World Pride to a total of $40K
· The Aboriginal Reconciliation Action Plan was adopted
· There was 100 percent utilisation of sporting fields during the quarter
· Customer issues continued to be resolved at first point of contact 85% of the time
· There were 95% of Council resolutions implemented as per the agreed timeframes
· The Annual Report was provided to the Office of Local Government and published on Council’s website, together with the audited financial statements
· There were 21,271 visitors to the Your Say Inner West engagement website during the quarter with 17 new projects that sought input and feedback from the community
· Grants were awarded for 69 community initiatives over the next two years
|
1.⇩ |
December 2022 QBRS |
|
2.⇩ |
Quarterly report - October-December 2022 |
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Inner West Council De-Amalgamation Business Case
Prepared By: Beau-Jane De Costa - Senior Manager Governance and Risk
Authorised By: Peter Gainsford - General Manager
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Submits the Deamalgamation Business Case, as considered by Council at the 13 September and the 6 December 2022 Council Meeting, with the additional attachment of the Ernst and Young risk report, to the Minister for Local Government; and
2. Includes the approved covering letter with the submission to the Minister for Local Government, that sets out clearly that de-amalgamation, should it occur, be done only on the following terms:
a) That the full costs of the de-amalgamation being between $178 million - $190 million be paid in full by the NSW Government, prior to the commencement of the de-amalgamation, with no costs to be borne by Inner West ratepayers; and
b) That the duly democratically elected representatives of Council will remain in office and the NSW Government will not install an interim unelected administrator.
|
BACKGROUND
At the 6 December 2022 Ordinary Council Meeting, the following recommendation was resolved by Council:
That Council:
1. Submits the business case as considered by Council at the September 2022 meeting to the Boundaries Commission for determination, with the Ernst and Young risk report attached; and
2. Writes a covering letter to Boundaries Commission with the submission of the business case that sets out clearly that de-amalgamation, should it occur, be done only on the following terms:
a) That the full costs of the de-amalgamation being between $178 million - $190 million be paid in full by the NSW Government, prior to the commencement of the de-amalgamation, with no costs to be borne by Inner West ratepayers; and
b) That the duly democratically elected representatives of Council will remain in office and the NSW Government will not install an interim unelected administrator.
Council subsequently submitted the business case to the Minister for Local Government on 12 December 2022, in accordance with the section 218CC and received a letter from the Minister of Local Government on 16 January 2023, confirming receipt of the business case and advising that it had been referred to the Local Government Boundaries Commission, refer attachment 1.
DISCUSSION
Council has now been requested from the Office of Local Government to amend the resolution of Council on 6 December 2022 slightly to provide clarity in relation to who the submission is specifically sent to being:
1. Submits the business case to the Boundaries Commission for determination;
TO
2. Submits the business case to the Minister for Local Government for determination;
This request is purely procedural, noting that the Minister has already confirmed receipt of the Business Case and advised that the Business Case has been submitted to the Boundaries Commission for consideration, refer attachment 1.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications resulting from the wording amendment requested by the Office of Local Government.
|
1.⇩ |
Letter - Minister for Local Government |
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Main Street Revitalisation Expression of Interest process
Prepared By: Daniel East - Acting Senior Manager Planning
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council endorses the process outlined in the report to call for Expressions of Interest from a coalition of local businesses, main street property owners, chambers of commerce, community and arts organisations to partner with Council in main street improvement projects.
|
DISCUSSION
At the 6 December 2022 meeting Council resolved
That Council:
1. Officers prepare a report for the February 2023 Ordinary Council Meeting outlining an expression of interest process that would be open to a coalition of local businesses, main street property owners, chambers of commerce, community and arts organisations to apply to Council for up to $1.5 million in capital investment in a main street improvement in return for them enacting a comprehensive plan for revitalisation of that street;
2. Identify funding through the 2023/2024 budget process for up to 5 main streets to be provided $1.5 million in capital works improvements, totalling $7.5 million in costs for the program;
3. Identify state and federal government grant funding that can assist to further expand the capital available for the program;
4. Consult with local businesses, main street property owners, chambers of commerce, community and arts organisations about the criteria for the expression of interest process and the nature of the works which would be undertaken through Council’s capital contribution; and
5. Seek advice from the Committee for Sydney, the NSW 24 Hour Commissioner and other relevant government and non-government organisations with expertise in main street revitalisation in developing the expression of interest criteria and the program
At the 25 October Council meeting it was resolved in part… That Council:
3. Proceed on the delivery of stage 1 short term projects (this financial year) utilising the main street strategy funds towards:
c) Development of an engagement and Expressions of Interest process with local Chambers of Commerce, businesses owners, land owners and the general public taking community ideas for main street upgrades (may include a grant program or Council-led work from community suggestions). Report back to Council on the EOI proposal and budget;
The above resolutions reflect a desire of the Council to invite Expressions of Interest (EOI) from our community for main street upgrades and other more selective community opportunities to undertake streetscape improvements in the Inner West. These resolutions call for:
1. Funding:
Sets out the intention to fund five (5) main street revitalisation projects in 2023/24 in capital improvements, totalling $7.5m, noting that the Council funds are expected to be spent across the five (5) Council wards.
2. Expression of Interest process:
Identifies an Expression of Interest (EOI) process whereby Council commits up to $1.5m in capital investment within a main street. In return, the applicants must partnership with Council in a comprehensive plan for revitalisation of the street.
3. Consultation:
Consultation with parties to confirm the nature of works (scope/range of works) to be undertaken using Council’s resources. Broader community engagement is also envisaged.
In response to resolution points 3 and 5:
· A comprehensive search and detailed inquiries have shown that there are currently no NSW Government grant funding programs currently available to support main street upgrades. The Commonwealth Government budget also does not identify any suitable funding sources for main street upgrades. It should be noted that the grant funding cycle is traditionally quiet over the Christmas/New Year period. This year, discretionary grant funding programs from the NSW Government are not expected to reach full capacity again until after the State election in March 2023. In the event this changes grants will be sought as a priority.
· Council has written to various government and non-government agencies with expertise in main street revitalisation and is awaiting a reply.
1. Funding
Local Government procurement requirements dictate that the EOI process must clearly indicate that it is an invitation seeking ideas and commitments from the proposer, not a proposal to spend Council funds.
The timeframes for delivery of Council works will need to respond to the type and character of proposals Council is prepared to accept.
The $7.5 million funding commitment towards up to five main streets must be identified through the budget process.
2. Expression of Interest Process
It is expected that the Expressions of Interest (EOI) process will encompass multiple stages including:
· Invitations to the Inner West community to submit proposals;
· Assessment, selection and reporting to Council via briefing note;
· Refinement of selected proposals that includes determining the scope of Council delivery works and a commitment from the proposer to deliver a comprehensive plan for revitalisation of that street
· Council preparation of a delivery package potentially involving both operational and capital works.
A two-step EOI process is recommended. This would include an early invitation and assessment of ideas followed by a second round of more detailed direct collaboration between the shortlisted applicants and Council. This second round will be focused on refinement and development of a specific delivery scope for both parties.
Stage 1 EOI:
The Stage 1 initial application will be received via a SmartyGrants Application and evaluated against the questions/criteria below. SmartyGrants is a grants management application that Inner West Council already use for annual community grants, Living Arts programs, and live music events. It supports council through the full management lifecycle of an EOI or grant, including receiving, assessing, notifying, and monitoring applications from the community.
It is expected that the EOIs will comply with the following requirements:
• The projects must take place in the Inner West Local Government Area;
• Project must enhance our main streets by contributing to the safety, vibrancy, and appearance of the local area;
• All projects are assessed as able to be completed in a short time, ideally within the 2023/24 financial year; and
• Prior to implementation, the proposals must still go through the usual Inner West Council processes for approvals including public exhibition of proposed plans.
The following selection criteria has been developed for an assessment of each proposal:
1. Who in our community will benefit from your proposal? Proposals that are expected to appeal to a broader group will be ranked highest.
2. How will it contribute to the vibrancy of main streets in the Inner West? Proposals focused on street activation and engagement of a broader community profile will be ranked highest.
3. Do you have experience delivering/participating in projects of this kind? Requires an assessment of relevant experience, skills and knowledge in this work area.
4. Can the Council defined works be delivered within a short timeframe and within the allocated budget? Requires the proposal to identify the scope of works in such a way that a reasonable estimate of the value of the works, timeframe for delivery and approval requirements can be determined.
5. Is there a commitment to any additional maintenance or caring for the attractiveness of the street in a cooperative arrangement with Council? Requires some sort of undertaking that the external party is willing to contribute resources that complement Council’s usual contribution to maintenance operations and capital works.
Councillors will be notified of shortlisted proposals via a briefing note, following completion of the initial evaluation process.
Stage 2 EOI:
Successful stage 1 applicants will be assigned an experienced Council project manager, to support the development of the project concept and its delivery.
The second round refinement and development of the proposals will effectively involve a direct engagement between Council officers and the proposers to turn their proposals into a workable solution that has clear responsibilities and commitments from each party. A memorandum of understanding or other form of agreement prior to committing to deliver the scope of works will be agreed by both parties. There may also be an opportunity to bring together different groups that have similar ideas and aligned interests.
This will include:
· Finalising of date/s, time/s, and location/s for delivery.
· Further the project concept if necessary.
· WH&S guidelines and risk assessment documentation as well as compliance with Council regulations including all necessary permits.
· Notifying the community of the scope of proposed improvements.
· Both parties entering into a binding agreement to deliver on their respective commitments.
Project delivery
Once these key elements are developed and agreed, successful applicants and Council officers will work collaboratively towards project delivery, according to the agreed scope. Successful applicants will lead on their elements of the project and Council officers will ensure the Council works program is delivered in accordance with the agreed program.
Development of the program
Documentation setting out details of the EOI process will be developed including forms that identify the requirements of submissions, criteria for assessment and identification of legally binding mechanisms for ensuring the commitments are met.
Council also needs to commit resources to programming and managing the works, including the monitoring of the progress of outside parties to deliver on their commitments and ensuring that the Council works progress to program.
3. Consultation
The consultation phase will initially be focused on a direct discussion with the parties who are shortlisted following receipt of the initial EOI submissions.
It is expected that, depending on the nature of the capital works required for successful projects, further engagement with residents and local stakeholders may be required once the project scope has been determined.
Program
It is anticipated the EOI process will proceed in accordance with the program identified in Attachment 1.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The $7.5 million funding commitment towards up to five main streets will be addressed via the budget process for next financial year.
|
1.⇩ |
Indicative timeline for EOI Process |
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: 67-75 Lords Road, Leichhardt - Planning Proposal
Prepared By: Daniel East - Acting Senior Manager Planning
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Does not support the Planning Proposal prepared by FPD Pty Ltd dated 3 August 2022 for 67-75 Lords Road, Leichhardt for the following reasons:
a) The Planning Proposal is inconsistent with Ministerial Direction 1.5 Parramatta Road Corridor Urban Transformation Strategy (PRCUTS Strategy) 1.5 (1)(a)(b) and (c) as the proposal does not adequately give effect to the objectives 1.5(a) of the Ministerial Direction and is inconsistent with Strategic Actions within the PRCUTS Strategy, and the Planning and Design Guidelines;
b) It fails the strategic and site-specific merit test of the Guidelines for Preparing Planning Proposals pursuant to Section 3.33 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act);
c) It is inconsistent with the following Council’s adopted Policies:
i) Local Strategic Planning Statement ii) Local Housing Strategy iii) Employment and Retail Lands Strategy iv) Affordable Housing Policy v) Community Strategic Plan
d) It is inconsistent with the following Ministerial Directions
i) 1.1 Implementation of Regional Plans ii) 1.5 Parramatta Road Corridor Urban Transformation Strategy iii) 4.1 Flooding
e) It is inconsistent with State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing) 2021;
f) The proposed design is unsatisfactory with respect to:
i) Flooding ii) Site servicing, access and circulation iii) Built form controls, including setbacks, building separation, open space.
2. Recommend that the Planning Proposal should not be progressed to the Minister of Planning in accordance with section 3.34 of the EP&A Act;
3. Should the proponent request a Rezoning Review by the NSW Department of Planning and Environment, or submit an amended Planning Proposal to Council the following matters should be considered in the assessment in addition to the matters in recommendation 1 above: i) The Planning Proposal be amended to omit business premises and office premises from the proposed Additional Permitted Uses;
ii) The Planning Proposal be amended to include a local provision requiring a minimum of 3,000sqm of non-residential uses;
iii) That an Affordable Housing Contributions Scheme be prepared as part of the Planning Proposal or a Planning Agreement be negotiated. The affordable housing percentage of residential development to comply with Inner West Affordable Housing Policy, being 15% subject to a detailed feasibility analysis
iv) Discussions be held with Council, DPE and TfNSW on the implementation of the Parramatta Road Corridor Precinct-wide Transport and Traffic Study as relevant to the Planning Proposal site;
v) Provide an updated Traffic and Parking Analysis report and any other specialist reports (as necessary) utilising and reflecting the most up to date data available;
vi) Consideration should be given to the proposed RE1 Public Recreation zone along the western boundary (75 Lords Road);
vii) Consideration should be given to the inadequate floor to ceiling heights of the light industrial units;
viii)A flood risk and impact assessment including pre- and post-development flood modelling be undertaken to satisfy the requirements of the Ministerial Direction 4.1 Flooding. |
DISCUSSION
A Planning Proposal was lodged on the NSW Planning Portal by Platino Properties on 31 August 2022. The Planning Proposal seeks to amend the Inner West Local Environmental Plan 2022 (IWLEP) to rezone the site from Light Industrial (IN2) to Medium Density Residential (R3), increase the FSR to 2.4:1 and introduce a height of building control of 30m (refer Attachment 1).
This LEP amendment intends to facilitate the development of the site for up to 25,480sqm of floorspace comprising 4 x 6 to 8 storey mixed use buildings, 1 x 2 storey residential building and at least 2,000sqm of non-residential uses at ground level across 4 of the buildings. The supporting concept scheme identifies that the site could accommodate up to 220 dwellings, which includes 60 Seniors Housing units. A minimum of 5 percent of the residential floorspace is proposed to be provided as affordable housing (home equity model) in perpetuity through a Community Housing Provider.
This Planning Proposal and the supporting technical studies have been assessed in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act) and relevant guidelines. The Planning Proposal was found to have insufficient strategic and site-specific merit. Subsequently, the Planning Proposal is not supported.
BACKGROUND
Two previous Planning Proposal applications were lodged for this site, on 21 May 2014 and 25 October 2018 respectively. These proposals were not supported by Council or the Sydney Central/Eastern City Planning Panels for the following reasons.
2014 Planning Proposal:
· Loss of industrial land
· Inconsistent with Ministerial Direction 1.1 – Business and Industrial Zones
· Not supported by net Community Benefit Test and Social Impact Assessment
· Net loss of jobs and diversity in economy, community activities and employment opportunity
· Proposed density/height inconsistent with R3 Medium Density Residential zoning
· Unacceptable amenity impacts from proposed built form
· Insufficient supply of affordable housing proposed
· Traffic impacts not adequately addressed
· Potential contamination not adequately addressed
· Uncertainty associated with West Connex and Parramatta Road Urban Renewal
2018 Planning Proposal:
· Did not meet strategic merit of Parramatta Road Corridor Transformation Strategy (PRCUTS) and the Eastern City District Plan
· Loss of industrial land
· Inconsistent with PRCUTS recommended planning controls
· Not compliant with the PRCUTS out of sequence checklist
· PRCUTS dwelling target can be achieved without this site
· Inconsistent with Ministerial Directions 1.1, 7.1 and 7.3
· Strategic planning matters such as flooding, heritage, land contamination, traffic impacts, loss of employment lands, sustainability targets were not adequately addressed
· Inadequate design quality
· Exceeded PRCUTS proposed FSR controls
SITE AND SURROUNDING CONTEXT
67-75 Lords Road, Leichhardt is a regular shaped lot of 10,691sqm. The site has a 77m frontage to Lords Road along the southern boundary and 76 metres northern boundary to Lambert Park. The eastern and western side boundaries comprise 111m and 133m respectively. The site is approximately 400m from Parramatta Road and 7km from the Sydney CBD. The Marion and Taverners Hill Light Rail stops are both within walking distance from the site and approximately 400m from Leichhardt Marketplace.
The site comprises two allotments, being Lot 1 DP 940543 (67-73 Lords Road) and Lot 1 DP 550608 (75 Lords Road) and is located on the northern side of Lords Road, with public open space located on the northern boundary, railway land to the west, Lords Road to the south and Davies Lane to the east. The site currently accommodates a range of light industrial and commercial uses including warehousing/storage, small scale manufacturing including furniture and joinery businesses and private recreation facilities.
Figure 1. Local Context (subject site outlined in red).
Figure 2. Subject site
The existing buildings on the site comprise three (3) buildings directly adjoining each other, comprising two (2) storey brick and metal roof buildings as well as a detached single storey brick and metal roof building in the front eastern corner of the site. The maximum height of the existing buildings on the site is approximately 11.5m. Vehicle access is currently obtained from two driveways in Lords Road which provide access to the various businesses.
Figure 3. Existing site and surrounding areas
The site is zoned IN2 Light Industrial under the Inner West Local Environmental Plan 2022 (IWLEP 2022) and the maximum FSR for the site is 1:1. The IWLEP 2022 does not stipulate a height of buildings control for the site. The site is located in the West Leichhardt Precinct of Leichhardt Development Control Plan 2013.
Figure 4: Existing Planning Controls
The site is located in the Taverners Hill Precinct of the Parramatta Road Corridor Urban Transformation Strategy (PRCUTS), a NSW Government endorsed strategy given statutory force via a Section 9.1 Ministerial Direction in November 2016.
The key state and local policies and strategies that apply to the site include:
· Parramatta Road Corridor Urban Transformation Strategy (Urban Growth) and supporting documents,
o PRCUTS Implementation Plan 2016-2023
o PRCUTS Planning and Design Guidelines
o PRCUTS: Urban Amenity Improvement Plan
o PRCUTS: Infrastructure Schedule
o PRCUTS: Implementation Update 2021
o Parramatta Road Corridor Precinct-Wide Traffic and Transport Study 2022–jointly commissioned study by IWC and DPE
· A Metropolis of Three Cities 2018 by the Greater Sydney Commission (GSC).
· Eastern City District Plan 2018 by the Greater Sydney Commission (GSC).
· ‘Our Place Inner West’ – Inner West Council’s (IWC) Local Strategic Planning Statement (LSPS)
· IWC Employment and Retail Lands Strategy (ERLS)
· IWC Local Housing Strategy (LHS)
· IWC Integrated Transport Strategy (ITS)
· IWC Affordable Housing Policy (AHP)
· Our Inner West 2036 - Community Strategic Plan (CSP)
The Taverners Hill Precinct within PRCUTS is an area in transition, with some other sites within Taverners Hill Precinct subject to an existing Council led planning proposal (known as Inner West LEP Phase 2A).
THE PLANNING PROPOSAL
This Planning Proposal (2022) seeks to make an amendment to the Inner West Local Environmental Plan 2022 planning controls as follows:
· Rezone the site from IN2 Light Industrial to R3 Medium Density Residential
· Introduce a maximum height of building of 30 metres (equivalent to 8 storeys)
· Increase the Floor Space Ratio (FSR) to 2.4:1
· Include a local provision requiring a minimum of 2,000 square metres of non-residential floor space
· Introduce additional permitted uses on the site, being business premises, industrial retail outlets, light industries, creative industries, office premises, restaurant or café, recreational facilities (indoor)
· Include a local provision requiring a minimum 5% of residential floor space to be delivered as affordable housing
The proposal seeks to facilitate a redevelopment of the site comprising 25,408sqm of floorspace primarily for residential flat buildings ranging from 6 to 8 storeys and a 2-storey residential building.
Figure 5: Proposed Planning Controls
In addition, the following is proposed:
· Minimum 2,000 square metres of ground floor employment floor space across 4 buildings
· 60 seniors housing independent living units
· 1000sqm publicly accessible open space
· An east-west pedestrian through site link
· A secondary Greenway north-south link to the east of the site to potentially connect to the Marion Light Rail stop
Figure 6: Proposed Concept Design Scheme
PLANNING PROPOSAL ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
The Planning Proposal has been assessed in accordance with Division 3.4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and the Local Environmental Plan Making Guidelines 2022.
A summary of the matters for consideration is provided in Table 1. A detailed assessment is provided in the Planning Proposal Assessment Checklist, Attachment 2 and the PRCUTS Out of Sequence Checklist Assessment, Attachment 4.
Council officers undertook internal consultation and engaged consultants to undertake technical peer reviews of the Urban Design and Economic Analysis to inform the assessment of the planning proposal. Further details of the Urban Design and Economic peer reviews are provided in Attachment 5 and Attachment 6 respectively.
Table 1 - Summary of Matters for Consideration
|
Matters for consideration |
Council Response |
|
Is the planning proposal a result of an endorsed LSPS, strategic study or report? |
The planning proposal aims to implement the outcomes of PRCUTS in line with the PRCUT Implementation Plan 2016-2023 and PRCUT: Implementation Update 2021. |
|
Is the planning proposal the best means of achieving the objectives or intended outcomes, or is there a better way? |
This planning proposal is inconsistent with PRCUTS and has insufficient strategic and site-specific merit. A more detailed planning proposal that addresses the matters raised in this report is a better way of achieving the objectives of PRCUTS. |
|
Will the planning proposal give effect to the objectives and actions of the applicable regional or district plan or strategy (including any exhibited draft plans or strategies)? |
The Planning Proposal is partially consistent with the Eastern City District Plan 2018. It is inconsistent with the PRCUTS Strategic Actions and the PRCUTS Planning and Design Guidelines. |
|
Is the planning proposal consistent with a council LSPS that has been endorsed by the Planning Secretary or GSC, or another endorsed local strategy or strategic plan? |
The planning proposal is inconsistent with Council’s LSPS, LHS and ERLS. However, Ministerial Direction 1.5, the Parramatta Road Corridor Urban Transformation Strategy takes precedent and prevails to the extent of any inconsistency. The endorsement of these Council strategies by state government was also subject to PRCUTS taking precedent. |
|
Is the planning proposal consistent with any other applicable State and regional studies or strategies? |
The planning proposal is partially consistent with the Greater Sydney Region Plan, the Eastern City District Plan and the PRCUTS. Further details can be found in Attachments 2 and 3. |
|
Is the planning proposal consistent with applicable SEPPs? |
The planning proposal is predominantly consistent with all relevant SEPPs except for SEPP (Housing) 2021. No affordable housing feasibility study has been undertaken and an Affordable Housing Contribution Scheme is not part of the planning proposal. No Letter of Offer to enter into a planning agreement has been made to deliver the affordable housing. |
|
Is the planning proposal consistent with applicable Ministerial Directions (section 9.1 Directions)? |
The planning proposal is inconsistent with Ministerial Direction 1.5 (Parramatta Road Corridor Urban Transformation Strategy) as there are inconsistencies with PRCUTS Implementation Plan 2016-2023, PRCUTS Implementation Update 2021, PRCUTS, and the PRCUTS Planning and Design Guidelines (refer to Attachments 2 and 3). The planning proposal is partially consistent with Ministerial Direction 1.1 Implementation of Regional Plans and inconsistent with Ministerial Direction 4.1 Flooding. |
|
Is there any likelihood that critical habitat or threatened species, populations or ecological communities, or their habitats, will be adversely affected because of the proposal? |
The subject site does not contain any critical habitat or threatened species, populations or ecological communities, or their habitats. |
|
Are there any other likely environmental effects of the planning proposal and how they proposed to be managed? |
The subject site is partially located within a flood area, with an area on the western boundary affected by flood storage in a 100 year ARI storm event. Part of the site is a high hazard flood zone in a PMF event. No pre or post development flood modelling has been undertaken for the site. |
|
Has the planning proposal adequately addressed any social and economic effects? |
The planning proposal has considered the need for variety of housing including affordable and seniors housing, however, has not considered how it will be delivered. In addition, the planning proposal is inconsistent with Inner West Affordable Housing Policy which requires 15% of the residential floor space (subject to feasibility). No feasibility study has been provided. There will be a net loss of jobs on the site, however this was envisaged by PRCUTS. Refer to Attachment 2 for a detailed report. |
|
Is there adequate public infrastructure for the planning proposal? |
The Inner West Local Infrastructure Contributions Plan 2022 (due to come into effect February 2023) considered the demand for local infrastructure arising from the implementation of PRCUTS. However, the proposal does not consider the recommendations of the Parramatta Road Precinct Wide Transport and Traffic Study. Infrastructure items not covered by the Inner West Infrastructure Contribution Plan have not been addressed with a Letter of Offer or Planning Agreement in the Planning Proposal. |
|
What are the views of state and federal public authorities and government agencies consulted in order to inform the Gateway determination? |
No information has been provided to ascertain if consultation with public authorities and government agencies was undertaken prior to lodgement of the August 2022 planning proposal. The Proponent has not provided preliminary views of any state or federal agency as part of the proposal. The Gateway determination will advise a list of public authorities to be consulted. |
KEY ISSUES
PRCUTS Ministerial Direction and Out of Sequence Checklist
The Ministerial Direction 1.5 Parramatta Road Corridor Urban Transformation Strategy requires the Planning Proposal to be consistent with the PRCUTS Implementation Toolkit, which includes a series of documents including the Implementation Plan 2016-2023, the Implementation Plan Update 2021, and the Planning and Design Guidelines. The proposal is considered to be inconsistent with Direction 1.5 (1)(a)(b) and (c) as the proposal does not adequately give effect to the objectives 1.5(a) of the Ministerial Direction and is inconsistent with Strategic Actions within the PRCUTS Strategy, and the Planning and Design Guidelines. Further details are provided in subsequent sections of this report.
The implementation update supplements the original implementation plan with requirements to fulfil additional actions. As the Planning Proposal relates to an individual site outside the 2016-2023 release area under the PRCUTS Implementation Plan 2016-2023, it is therefore required to:
· satisfy the requirements of the ‘Out of Sequence Checklist’ in the Parramatta Road Corridor Implementation Plan 2016 – 2023 (November 2016), or
· clearly demonstrate that it delivers a better outcome, or
· be of minor significance.
The assessment of the Planning Proposal found numerous inconsistencies against the PRCUTS suite of requirements. These are considered to be of major significance. No justification as to how the Planning Proposal could deliver a better outcome has been provided. A merit-based assessment of the Proponent’s Out of Sequence Checklist (Appendix C) against the requirements of the Ministerial Direction 1.5 including the Implementation Plan 2016-2023 and Implementation Update 2021 was undertaken and is summarised below.
Ministerial Direction 1.5 Parramatta Road Corridor Urban Transformation Strategy -
PRCUTS Implementation Update 2021 – the proposal does not have adequate regard to the Parramatta Road Corridor Precinct-wide Traffic and Transport Study (2022) in relation to improved public transport, active transport and road network outcomes.
PRCUTS Implementation Plan 2016-2023 – does not satisfactorily demonstrate consistency with the Out of Sequence Checklist Criteria as follows:
· Criteria 1. Strategic objectives, land use and development – Does not comprehensively address the requirements of this criteria. Including:
o Inconsistent with the PRCUT Strategy Land Use and Transport Planning Principles:
§ Principle 1: Housing Choice and Affordability – Does not meet affordable housing targets as set out in council’s Affordable Housing Policy, has not proposed an Affordable Housing Contributions Scheme or VPA as alternative mechanism, and no feasibility testing has been undertaken.
§ Principle 2: Diverse and Resilient Economy – Does not consider design response required to address potential land use conflicts in relation to the co-location of residential and light industrial uses on the site.
§ Principle 3: Accessibility – The proposed car parking rates exceed those required in PRCUTS, discouraging the use of sustainable modes of transport. Further, the Traffic and Parking Report includes outdated traffic survey data (2018) which may reflect inaccurate traffic generation results.
§ Principle 4: Vibrant Communities Places – Relies on outdated funding mechanism (RIC) for state infrastructure. Inconsistent with urban design elements such as street wall heights and setbacks.
§ Principle 5: Green Spaces and Links – Inconsistent with the recommended RE1 Public Recreation land use zoning for 75 Lords Rd, Leichhardt (Lot 1 DP 550608)
§ Principle 6: Sustainability and Resilience – BASIX energy targets are less than PRCUTS Planning and Design Guideline requirements for buildings of 2-5 storeys, car parking rates are higher than recommended and no controls for 60% canopy cover over pedestrian spaces. Appendix K: Sustainability Strategy does not adequately demonstrate how it will ensure long term sustainability targets as set out in PRCUTS.
§ Principle 7: Delivery – Does not consider the recommendations of the Parramatta Road Precinct Wide Transport and Traffic Study. Infrastructure items not covered by IWC Infrastructure Contribution Plan have not been addressed with a Letter of Offer or Planning Agreement in the Planning Proposal.
o Does not satisfactorily contribute to the Corridor wide and Taverners Hill Precinct specific vision,
o Does not adequately demonstrate net community, economic and environmental benefits for the Corridor and the Taverners Hill Precinct,
o Inconsistent with the recommended land uses and street wall heights outlined in the PRCUTS Planning and Design Guidelines.
· Criteria 2. Integrated Infrastructure Delivery Plan – IIDP does not sufficiently address section 7.11 local contributions and approach to delivery of affordable housing is inconsistent with Council’s Affordable Housing Policy. The IIDP does not consider the Parramatta Road Corridor Precinct-wide Traffic and Transport Study (2022) and the funding mechanism associated with the local infrastructure recommendations.
· Criteria 3. Stakeholder Engagement – No recent stakeholder consultation undertaken to respond to current stakeholder perspectives and issues as required by the Out of Sequence Checklist. Pre-lodgement phase as required by the DPE LEP Making Guideline 2022 and Council policy has not been undertaken. No documented State or Council support or agreement was provided.
· Criteria 4. Sustainability – No clear mechanism provided or included in the draft Site-Specific DCP to ensure that the long-term sustainability targets identified in the PRCUTS strategic actions can be achieved.
· Criteria 5. Feasibility – Insufficient detail on the assumed development outputs and infrastructure costs with no evidence provided to confirm economic feasibility of the site rezoning from light industrial to medium density residential uses. No justification provided to support the proposed quantum of affordable housing.
· Criteria 6. Market Viability – Insufficient detail to demonstrate the market viability associated with the proposed non-residential uses.
A more detailed assessment is undertaken in the PRCUTS Out of Sequence Checklist Assessment is provided at Attachment 4.
PRCUTS Planning Controls
The PRCUTS Planning and Design Guidelines, identifies the recommended planning controls for the Taverners Hill Precinct as shown in Figure 7.
Figure 7: Recommended Planning Controls (PRCUT Planning and Design Guidelines)
The Planning Proposal is inconsistent with the recommended land use zoning, as it seeks to rezone both sites (Lot 1 DP 940543 and Lot 1 DP 550608) to R3 Medium Density Residential. The recommended land zoning of Lot 1 DP 550608 (75 Lords Road) in PRCUTS is RE1 Public Recreation. PRCUTS does not recommend any floor space or height controls for this site. The Planning Proposal has not acknowledged this inconsistency and consequently has not provided a study that demonstrates a better outcome can be achieved for the alternate proposal to PRCUTS. The Planning Proposal is therefore also inconsistent with Ministerial Direction 1.5 Parramatta Road Corridor.
Additional permitted uses
· The Planning Proposal proposes additional permitted uses including, business premises, industrial retail outlets, light industries, creative industries, office premises, restaurant or café, and recreational facilities (indoor).
· It also proposes a local provision requiring a minimum of 2,000 square metres of non-residential floor space.
As identified in the SGS Economics and Planning Economic Peer Review (Attachment 6), the extensive list of additional permitted uses would not realistically result in any light industrial floor space being provided on the site, as light industrial uses are lower types of economic activity uses that would have to compete with higher economic activity uses (i.e. office, business and restaurant/café). Given the previous Planning Proposal in 2018 included 3,000 sqm of non-residential floor space, it is considered a non-residential floor space of 3,000sqm be provided. This would better align with Council’s strategies to retain employment lands.
Therefore, should the Planning Proposal progress, the following amendments should be made:
· Omit business premisses and office premises from the Additional Permitted Uses (Schedule 1 Additional Permitted Uses)
· Include a local provision requiring a minimum of 3,000sqm of non-residential uses
The Assessment Checklist at Attachment 2 and the PRCUTS Out of Sequence Checklist at Attachment 4 provide a more detailed assessment in relation to this matter.
Ministerial Direction 4.1 Flooding
The site is affected by flood storage along the western boundary in the 100-year ARI storm event. This area also serves as a floodway through to Marion Street in the PMF event (6.8m AHD) as water levels exceed the existing embankment levels of Lambert Park (approximately 4.5m AHD) and overtop the embankment before continuing to flow downstream.
No pre or post flood modelling has been undertaken for the Planning Proposal and the proposed building footprints of two buildings are located in the flood area.
Figure 8: Topography and flooding map with building envelope overlay
It is acknowledged that the concept plan includes the provision of a compensatory 1:100 YR ARI flood storage area in the basement. Notwithstanding, the information provided is insufficient to satisfy the Ministerial Direction 4.1 Flooding.
Affordable Housing
The proposed affordable housing contribution of a minimum 5% of the residential floor space is inconsistent with Council’s affordable housing target (15% of new residential floor space, subject to feasibility). It is noted that PRCUTS requires a minimum provision of 5% new housing as affordable housing or in line with Government policy of the day. The Eastern City District Plan and Greater Sydney Regional Plan nominate a target of 5-10% of new floorspace to be delivered as affordable housing subject to viability. Further, the Eastern City District Plan also recognises that higher affordable rental housing targets may be warranted depending on the type of land rezoned and the value uplift generated.
As discussed above, no validated feasibility assessment was prepared for the Planning Proposal. Detailed feasibility modelling should be undertaken by the Proponent that demonstrates the development considerations, cost and revenue assumptions and testing of different levels of affordable housing. As indicated in the SGS Economic Peer Review, it is likely that detailed feasibility modelling would result in establishing a higher affordable housing provision for the site than is currently being proposed.
No Affordable Housing Contributions Scheme has been proposed and no Letter of Offer to enter into a Planning Agreement to deliver the affordable housing has been provided. An agreed delivery mechanism is required to ensure that affordable housing on the site is realised. Furthermore, the PRCUTS Implementation Plan Update 2021 (Next Steps - 4) requires Councils to progress strategic planning proposals to implement PRCUTS including: (b) incorporating local affordable housing target schemes.
The affordable housing model proposed is also inconsistent with Council’s AHP as it is a shared equity model which does not meet Council’s /NSW state government definition of affordable housing.
Infrastructure Funding
The PRCUTS Implementation Plan 2016 - 2023 and PRCUTS Implementation Update 2021 identifies the need for State and Local Infrastructure to support planning proposals. The PRCUTS Implementation Update 2021 includes additional matters that must be considered, including any published plans or studies relating to active transport, open space, and road improvements and upgrades.
The Integrated Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IIDP) (Appendix P) does not consider the recommendations of the Parramatta Road Precinct Wide Transport and Traffic Study. Local infrastructure recommendations from the Study such as the footpaths, share paths and cycleways (refer to the Out of Sequence Checklist) are excluded from Section 7.11 Inner West Local Infrastructure Contributions Plan 2022 (adopted 6 December 2022). These infrastructure items are to be considered as part of a Planning Agreement funding mechanism subject to negotiations with Council. It is noted that the Planning Proposal is not supported with a Letter of Offer for a Planning Agreement.
Lack of Public Benefits
The Planning Proposal has not adequately provided public benefits that would serve to benefit the broader community. With the exception of the affordable housing provision, the other deliverables are not considered ‘public benefits’. A secondary N-S GreenWay link could be supported but note this is identified in the PRCUTS as RE1 Public Recreation.
The provision of non-residential floor space or other types of housing are not explicit benefits to the public as these uses are still income-generating uses for the proponents. Additionally, the publicly accessible open space of the development, is not considered to be a public benefit as it would solely benefit the residents and the proposed ground level commercial and community users of the site. It would not benefit the broader community, as it is unlikely to be used by the wider community or bring broader environmental benefits.
Seniors Housing
Insufficient information has been provided on the proposed 60 senior independent living units, including their location and potential impact on the proposed concept plan, given the height and FSR bonus available under the State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing) 2021.
Urban Design Issues
While Council is in principle support of the secondary link to the GreenWay, there are a number of non-compliant issues with PRCUTS, Apartment Design Guide (ADG) and Council policies including:
· proposed setbacks that in places do not meet the PRCUT Planning and Design Guidelines
· building separation and open space requirements that do not meet the ADG requirements
· internal access, servicing and circulation matters requiring further consideration
· lack of pre- and post-development flood modelling to confirm built form outcomes
· no consideration of the RE1 Public Recreation recommended zone in PRCUTS.
Refer to the Assessment Checklist (Attachment 2) and the Urban Design Peer Review (Attachment 5) for a more detailed analysis.
Insufficient information in the Draft DCP
The draft DCP (Appendix E) has not addressed a number of matters including:
· controls for a mixed-use development of light industrial/residential to mitigate potential land use conflicts
· a design response conducive to light industrial uses such as double height floor-to-ceiling height and more direct tenancy- to-vehicle access
· car parking rates in excess of the PRCUTS maximum rates for the Taverners Hill precinct
· controls to ensure that the long-term sustainability targets identified in PRCUTS’ strategic actions can be achieved.
Refer to the Assessment Checklist (Attachment 2), the Urban Design Peer Review (Attachment 5) and the Economic Peer Review (Attachment 6) for a more detailed analysis.
Inner West Tree Management DCP
The Planning Proposal is inconsistent with the Inner West Tree Management DCP which has a requirement for 25% site tree cover as the site is proposed to be zoned R3 Medium Density Residential and is over 1500sqm in size. In addition, the Planning Proposal does not have adequate regard to the controls relating to the retention of existing trees and minimising impacts of development on existing trees.
Loss of employment lands
The proposal aims to rezone IN2 Light Industrial land to R3 Medium Density Residential. Inner West Council has a strong policy position on the retention of Industrial Lands with retain and manage being key directions and actions in the LSPS, LHS and the ERLS. This policy position is supported by a strong evidence base for the need to retain and actually increase the employment and urban services floorspace in the LGA (ERLS 2020), Leichhardt Industrial Land Study (2014) and Leichhardt Industrial Precinct Planning Study (2016).
At state level, both the Greater Sydney Region Plan and the Eastern City District Plan include objectives to retain and manage industrial urban services lands. However, the Ministerial Direction 1.5 gives legislative effect to the PRCUTS, such that it prevails where there is an inconsistency with another policy. The endorsement by DPE and Greater Sydney Commission of Council’s LSPS, LHS and the ERLS was subject to PRCUTS prevailing to the extent of any inconsistency.
The diagram below demonstrates the land use preference of various strategies and policies.
Figure 9: Land use preference of various strategies/policies (SGS: Economic Peer Review at 67-75 Lords Road, Leichhardt)
Therefore, whilst the Planning Proposal is inconsistent with Council’s policies to retain and manage industrial and urban services land, PRCUTS will prevail as 67-73 Lords Road, Leichhardt is identified for a R3 Medium Density Residential zone. However, 75 Lords Road, Leichhardt is identified for a RE1 Public Recreation zone and with which the Planning Proposal is inconsistent.
The Planning Proposal also proposes to include additional permitted uses which may be able to retain some light industrial uses on the site. As recommended above, Council supports an increased provision of non-residential uses to 3,000sqm but omitting the proposed business and commercial additional permitted uses to encourage the retention and viability of future industrial uses on the site.
INNER WEST LOCAL PLANNING PANEL
In accordance with Division 2.5 (2.19) of the EP&A Act 1979, the Planning Proposal was
referred to the Inner West Local Planning Panel (IWLPP) by Council on 20 December 2022.
The IWLPP resolved that the Planning Proposal should not be supported. Reasons for the recommendation align with Council’s assessment and the key issues outlined in this report. Further details of the IWLPP Meeting Report and Minutes can be seen at Attachment 6.
CONCLUSION
The Planning Proposal for 67-75 Lords Road, Leichhardt has been assessed in accordance with the EP&A Act and relevant guidelines. The Planning Proposal in its current form contains broad inconsistencies with a number of section 9.1 Local Planning Directions, SEPPs, and Council Policies. The Planning Proposal was found to have numerous and significant inconsistencies against PRCUTS, specifically the Ministerial Direction 1.5 Parramatta Road Corridor Urban Transformation Strategy and the supporting documents forming the Implementation Toolkit.
Collectively, the breadth of inconsistencies are of major significance and are not adequately justified in the proposal as to how a better outcome could be achieved.
Several other key issues such as flooding, affordable housing, infrastructure funding mechanisms, lack of public benefit, various urban design issues and loss of employment lands are not adequately addressed. The resolution of these issues would incur design changes, likely to have significant implications to the Planning Proposal and its supporting concept plan.
Subsequently, the Planning Proposal fails the strategic and site-specific merit test. It is therefore recommended that this proposal should not be supported to progress through the Gateway process. Should the proposal progress notwithstanding Council’s recommendation, i.e. through a Rezoning Review process, several amendments to the Planning Proposal are recommended to ensure that the key issues outlined above are addressed.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Nil.
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Due to their large size, please follow the below link to Council’s website to access:
· The supporting studies to Attachment 1 – Planning Proposal as listed below:
Planning Proposal supporting studies (August 2022)
· Appendix A: PRCUTS – Vision
· Appendix B: PRCUTS – Principles and Strategic Actions
· Appendix C: Out of Sequence Checklist
· Appendix D: 67-75 Lords Road Masterplan: Urban Design Report
· Appendix E: Draft Site-Specific Development Controls
· Appendix F: Statement of Heritage Impact
· Appendix G: Flood Risk and Impact Assessment
· Appendix H: Traffic and Parking Assessment
· Appendix I: Development Application Noise Assessment
· Appendix J: Aboricultural Assessment Report
· Appendix K: Sustainability Planning Report
· Appendix L: Detailed Site Investigation
· Appendix M: Preliminary Acid Sulphate Soil Assessment
· Appendix N: Economic Impact Assessment
· Appendix O: Social Impact Assessment
· Appendix P: Integrated Infrastructure Delivery Plan
· Appendix Q: Market Research Advice
· Appendix R: Market Demand Letter
· Attachments 4-6 of the Council Report:
· Attachment 4 - Out of Sequence Checklist
· Attachment 5 – Urban Design Peer Review
· Attachment 6 – Lords Road Economic Peer Review
|
1.⇩ |
Lords Road Planning Proposal (Proponent) |
|
2.⇩ |
Lords Road Planning Proposal Assessment (Council) |
|
3.⇩ |
Inner West Local Planning Panel Report and Minutes |
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Post Exhibition Report 469R Princes Highway, Sydenham - Voluntary Planning Agreement
Prepared By: Scott Mullen - Strategic Investments and Property Manager
Authorised By: Kelly Loveridge - Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Enter into the Amended Voluntary Planning Agreement for 469R Princes Highway, Sydenham as provided in Attachment 1 to this report; and
2. Authorise the General Manager to approve an amendment to the parties to the amended VPA should the property be sold. |
DISCUSSION
469-473 Princes Highway, Sydenham (Property) is located on the south-western corner of the intersection of Princes Highway and Railway Road.
Ooh Media Assets Pty Ltd (Developer) is the current holder of the Lease for signage located within the private property of 469-473 Princes Highway, Sydenham NSW.
The Developer lodged a Development Application with Council for digital signage and landscaping.
As part of the Development Application, the Developer submitted an offer to enter into a Voluntary Planning Agreement (VPA) with Council under which the Developer agreed to provide a monetary contribution to Council, should consent be granted for the Development Application.
At its 10 May 2022 meeting the Local Planning Panel approved the following development at the Property:
“To replace the existing static advertising sign with an electronic advertising sign, carry out associated landscaping and provide a new hardstand parking area"
The approval was subject to the following Deferred Commencement Condition:
“In accordance with the offer contained within the Statement of Environmental Effects, the Applicant is to enter into a Planning Agreement under section 7.4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 with Council. A copy of the executed Planning Agreement must be submitted to Council.”
The approval was also subject to the following condition in relation to the
Construction Certificate:
“Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority must be provided written evidence from Council that all matters in the executed Voluntary Planning Agreement must be complied with. The Voluntary Planning Agreement is attached as “Annexure 1” to this Determination Notice”
In accordance with the EP&A Act (Act) Planning Agreements must be publicly notified and made available for public inspection before they can be executed
At its Council meeting on 25 October 2022, Council considered the VPA that relates to the Property and resolved:
That the Voluntary Planning Agreement (VPA) for 469R Princes Highway, Sydenham be:
1. Placed on public exhibition for a minimum of 28 days;
2. Reported back to Council after public exhibition; and
3. Authorises the General Manager to approve any amendments to the amended VPA prior to public exhibition.
Planning approval will not be operative until the VPA has been signed by both parties.
Engagement Methods
The VPA was publicly exhibited for 28 days from 1 November to 28 November 2022. The engagement was undertaken online via Your Say Inner West and promoted through Council’s website and social media.
Engagement Outcomes
Four (4) submissions were received with one supporting the proposed VPA and three raising concerns. Below is a summary of the concerns raised.
· I oppose the hardstand parking area. This area could be put to much better use than the significant ongoing subsidisation of car drivers. The land area should be completely landscaped, to try to reduce the awful hellscape of a road that is Princess Highway. I have no opinion either way in regards to the signage upgrade.
· The electronic sign is an eyesore and traffic hazard. No permission is needed for landscaping. Parking is a good idea. The fee of $15,000 pa to rent the site from Council is a paltry amount given the amount the company would expect to gain in revenue. It is not in keeping with commercial standards for outdoor advertising.
· It’s a absolutely terrible idea and great example of utter lazy thoughtlessness. Use the space for something environmentally friendly and child friendly. Something that contributes to the air we breathe...something that gives the space something positive. Not bloody advertising and a *##* carpark! The area is becoming treeless with all the infrastructure going up in the area.
It is noted that the land the subject of the planning approval and VPA is privately owned.
The Local Planning Panel assessed the Developers application on its merits, approving to “replace the existing static advertising sign with an electronic advertising sign, carry out associated landscaping and provide a new hardstand parking area".
The Developer is leasing the signage from the owner of the land. The rental payment to Council is separate to any commercial agreement the Developer may have with the land owner.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Council will receive a monetary contribution of $15,000 per annum + GST for each of the five years of the consent, with the annual payment to be indexed to CPI annually.
|
1.⇩ |
Contributions Deed_ Sydneham Sign_ oOH Media and Inner West Council |
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Local Traffic Committee Meeting - 5 December 2022
Prepared By: Manod Wickramasinghe - Traffic and Transport Planning Manager
Authorised By: Ryann Midei - Director Infrastructure
|
RECOMMENDATION
That the Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee meeting held on 5 December 2022 be received and the recommendations be adopted. |
ITEMS BY WARD
|
Ward |
Item |
|
Baludarri (Balmain) |
Manning Street, Rozelle - 'No Stopping' Restriction |
|
Gulgadya (Leichhardt) |
Edith Street, Leichhardt (South of Marion Street) - Angle Parking Proposal |
|
Update on improvements to the Frederick Street, Ashfield crossing |
|
|
Traffic in Chandos Street, Haberfield |
|
|
Midjuburi (Marrickville) |
Hillcrest Street, Tempe – Proposed Landscaped Kerb Blister Raingarden (Design Plan No.10202) |
|
Tempe Reserve, Tempe – Temporary Road Closures for Sydney IGLFA Soccer Tournament 20-23 February 2023 |
|
|
Traffic signal projects awaiting approval |
|
|
Djarrawunang (Ashfield) |
Garnet and Terrace Lanes, Dulwich Hill – Changes to Existing Parking Restrictions |
|
Traffic signal projects awaiting approval |
|
|
Damun (Stanmore) |
Nil. |
|
All Wards |
Traffic Committee Schedule 2023 |
DISCUSSION
The December 2022 meeting of the Local Traffic Committee was at Ashfield Service Centre. The minutes of the meeting are shown at Attachment 1.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Projects proposed for implementation are funded within existing budget allocations.
PUBLIC CONSULTATION
Specific projects have undergone public consultation as indicated in the respective reports to
the Traffic Committee.
|
1.⇩ |
Local Traffic Committee meeting minutes 5 December 2022 |
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Change to procurement regulations and review of Guidelines
Prepared By: Geoff Galea - Procurement Services Manager
Authorised By: Kelly Loveridge - Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council delegate decisions to the General Manager to decline all tenders and either:
a) postpone or cancel the proposal for the contract,
b) invite, in accordance with section 167, 168 or 169, fresh tender submissions based on the same or different details,
c) invite, in accordance with section 168, fresh applications from persons interested in making a tender submission for the proposed contract,
d) invite, in accordance with section 169, fresh applications from persons interested in making a tender submission for contracts of the same kind as the proposed contract as per the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021.
|
DISCUSSION
In late December the Office of Local Government (OLG) released Circular 22-40 Amendments to the tendering provisions of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021 and consultation on the development of new procurement guidelines for councils.
Background
The OLG have made amendments to the tendering provisions of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021 to streamline the process and reflect the increased use of electronic tendering by councils.
The amendments, which have been developed following a public consultation process, will give effect to a recommendation by the Audit Office and are intended to support councils to achieve greater efficiencies in their procurement.
Amendments
The most significant amendment proposed relates to the process for rejecting all tenders if required after a tendering process. The previous regulation required that a decision to reject all tenders could only be made by a resolution of Council. The change to the regulation will allow decisions to decline to accept all tenders to be made under delegation.
Note however that a decision to decline to accept all tenders and to enter into negotiations in relation to the subject matter of the tender, must still be made by a resolution of the Council to ensure transparency and accountability.
Under Part 7 the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021 the following decisions can now be made under delegation:
Reject all tenders and:
(a) postpone or cancel the proposal for the contract,
(b) invite, in accordance with section 167, 168 or 169, fresh tender submissions based on the same or different details,
(c) invite, in accordance with section 168, fresh applications from persons interested in making a tender submission for the proposed contract,
(d) invite, in accordance with section 169, fresh applications from persons interested in making a tender submission for contracts of the same kind as the proposed contract
It is recommended that the General Manager be provided delegation to approve where a Tender Evaluation Panel has recommended that all tenders be rejected and one of the above options is proposed. This would reduce delays in closing out an open tender in order to proceed with one of the alternative options and ensure the procurement need is addressed in a timely manner.
The following would continue to require a Council resolution:
Reject all tenders and:
(e) enter into negotiations with any person (whether or not the person was a tenderer) with a view to entering into a contract in relation to the subject matter of the tender.
Other changes to the regulation are as follows:
· Councils no longer require a secure physical tender box for hard copy submissions.
· A member of the public is no longer permitted to attend a tender opening.
· If a tender is submitted by electronic means it must be secure encryption based technology, that ensures the tender submission cannot be subsequently altered. IWC already uses the Vendor Panel platform for all tenders which ensures compliance with this requirement.
Development of new procurement guidelines by OLG
The OLG is developing comprehensive new procurement guidelines to complement the new regulation. The proposed guidelines are intended to provide best practice guidance on:
· all steps of the tendering process,
· procurement below the tendering threshold of $250,000
· the use of NSW Government prequalification schemes and other Prescribed Entities contractor panels
· the use of procurement to promote social and economic development outcomes, and
· contract management and evaluation.
The OLG is seeking the views of Councils and others on the content of the proposed guidelines and to identify best practice procurement in the local government sector.
Council staff have been liaising with the Southern Sydney Region of Councils (SSROC) procurement working group about the proposed changes, and SSROC will be facilitating the preparation of a joint submission to the OLG for all member councils.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Nil.
|
1.⇩ |
OLG Circular 22-40 |
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Conduct of the Local Government Election September 2024
Prepared By: Beau-Jane De Costa - Senior Manager Governance and Risk
Authorised By: Kelly Loveridge - Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
The Inner West Council (“the Council”) resolves:
1. Pursuant to s. 296(2) and (3) of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) (“the Act”) that an election arrangement be entered into by contract for the Electoral Commissioner to administer all elections of the Council;
2. Pursuant to s. 296(2) and (3) of the Act, as applied and modified by s. 18, that a council poll arrangement be entered into by contract for the Electoral Commissioner to administer all council polls of the Council; and
3. Pursuant to s. 296(2) and (3) of the Act, as applied and modified by s. 18, that a constitutional referendum arrangement be entered into by contract for the Electoral Commissioner to administer all constitutional referenda of the Council.
|
DISCUSSION
In accordance with the section 296AA of the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act), NSW councils are required to make a decision by 13 March 2023 on how their elections, including those in September 2024, are to be administered. Councils must resolve to either:
- enter into an election arrangement with the NSW Electoral Commissioner to administer all council’s elections, polls and constitutional referenda or
- have council’s elections administered by another electoral service provider engaged by council.
The 2017 and 2021 elections were conducted by the NSW Electoral Commission (NSWEC). The results of the election were confirmed within one week of the election day. Council received no complaints on the conduct of the election by the NSWEC.
Alternatively, Council could consider administering its own election by engaging a private company with experience running elections. However, anecdotal evidence suggests that not only could be this a more expensive option, but it could result in council staff being relied on to carry out various electoral functions including manning polling booths, refunding candidate nomination deposits and providing election support for candidates. It is considered that council does not have sufficient resources to perform these functions in accordance with the applicable requirements.
It is recommended that Inner West Council again engage the NSWEC to administer all council’s elections, polls and constitutional referenda, as was done in 2017 and 2021.
Council has included $1,470,515.00 into the FY23/24 draft budget for the September 2024 Local Government Elections, based on the quotation received from the NSWEC on 30 January 2023.
This amount excludes any costs associated with a by-election/countback or other polls or referenda which may be required by Inner West Council. Any such requirement would necessitate a separate quotation from the NSWEC and allocation of a budget.
|
1.⇩ |
OLG Circular No 22-35 |
|
2.⇩ |
OLG FAQ 22-35 |
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Post Exhibition - Amended Model Code of Meeting Practice
Prepared By: Beau-Jane De Costa - Senior Manager Governance and Risk
Authorised By: Kelly Loveridge - Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopts the draft Model Code of Meeting Practice in attachment 1.
|
Background
At the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 25 October 2022, Council resolved the following:
That Council:
1. Amend the Code of Meeting Practice to include an additional Clause as follows:
4.25: Where an item has been listed on a Council Meeting agenda, including Extraordinary Meetings and formed part of the public forum for that meeting, should those items be held over to a future meeting of Council, those items will not form part of another public forum at a future meeting.
2. Place the amended Code of Meeting Practice, as detailed above, on public exhibition for a period of 28 days.
3. Consider the results of the public exhibition process when adopting the final Code of Meeting Practice.
Council has amended the Model Code of Meeting Practice to reflect the above Council resolution and subsequently placed the amended Code of Meeting Practice on public Exhibition in accordance with Section 361 (3) and (4) of the Local Government Act 1993.
DISCUSSION
Submissions received
The following two submissions were received throughout the public exhibition period regarding the amended Model Code of Meeting Practice.
· That the change proposed was reasonable providing there had been no changes made to the report when it is considered again by Council; and
· If the item is deferred, then the public needs to be able to speak again as there will have been up to four weeks between consideration of the item and recordings need to be retained for future reference.
In considering the above feedback, the proposed changes are still recommended because (1) Council will not make any changes to a report that has been rolled over to the next meeting for consideration, as outlined in the first submission received, and (2) Council already retains the recording of Council meetings for future reference, as requested in the second submission.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no budget implications associated with the adoption of the amended Model Code of Meeting Practice.
|
1.⇩ |
Draft Model Code of Meeting Practice 2023 |
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: National General Assembly of Local Government 2023
Prepared By: Beau-Jane De Costa - Senior Manager Governance and Risk
Authorised By: Kelly Loveridge - Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Determine the Councillors attending the National General Assembly of Local Government 2023;
2. Determine the one (1) councillor that will be the voting delegate; and
3. Decide which proposed motions, that meet the National General Assembly’s criteria, will be submitted on behalf of Council. |
DISCUSSION
Convened annually by the Australian Local Government Association (ALGA), the National General Assembly (NGA) of Local Government is the peak annual event for Local Government, attracting in excess of 800 Mayors and Councillors each year.
This event provides a unique opportunity for Local Government to engage directly with the Federal Government, to develop national policy and to influence the future direction of councils and communities. The NGA will be held in Canberra from 13-15 June 2023.
The purpose of the NGA is to bring together councils from around Australia to discuss, debate and adopt motions of national significance with a focus on how partnerships, particularly between the Australian Government and Local Governments, can tackle immediate challenges facing communities.
In previous years (2022, 2021 and 2019) Council has determined that five (5) Councillors would attend the NGA.
Each Council is entitled to one (1) voting delegate.
The theme for the 2023 NGA is “Our Communities, Our Future”.
Submitting Motions
The National General Assembly calls for Councils to consider submitting motions for debate, this is an important opportunity for councils to influence the national policy agenda and promote new ways of strengthening the local government sector and communities we serve.
When submitting motions Council should focus on how partnerships can address national issues at the local level, and new ways the Australian Government could partner to strengthen the local government sector to advance community well-being, local economic development, create jobs, address environmental challenges, climate change and complex social issues such as housing affordability.
If Council chooses to submit a motion/s there is an expectation that a council representative will be present at the NGA to move and speak to that motion, if required.
Motions will need to be adopted by the Ordinary Council Meeting on 14 March 2023, at the latest, to ensure we are able to submit the motion/s for consideration at the Conference by the deadline of 24 March 2023.
Criteria for motions
To be eligible for inclusion in the Business Papers, and subsequent debate on the floor, motions must meet the following criteria:
1. Be relevant to the work of local government nationally.
2. Not be focused on a specific jurisdiction, location or region – unless the project or issue has national implications.
3. Be consistent with the themes of the NGA.
4. Complement or build on the policy objectives of ALGA and your state or territory local government association.
5. Be submitted by a council which is a financial member of their state or territory local government association.
6. Propose a clear action and outcome ie call on the Australian Government to act on something.
7. Not be advanced on behalf of external third parties that may seek to use the NGA to apply pressure to Board members, or to gain national political exposure for positions that are not directly relevant to the work of, or in the national interests of, local government.
8. Address issues that will directly improve the capacity of local government to deliver services and infrastructure for the benefit of all Australian communities.
9. Not seek to advance an outcome that would result in a benefit to one group of councils to the detriment of another.
10. Be supported by sufficient evidence to support the outcome being sought and demonstrate the relevance and significance of the matter to local government nationally.
Motions should generally be in a form that seeks the NGA’s support for a particular action or policy change at the Federal level which will assist local governments to meet local community needs.
To further assist Councillors with the development of potential motions Councillors have been provided with the ALGA discussion paper, the previous 3 years of Inner West motions and the format and information required for each motion, as detailed in attachment 1, 2 and 3.
To date Councillors have submitted the following motions for consideration at the Council meeting, refer attachment 4:
· Yes to the Circular Economy and No to Incinerators
· Uluru Statement
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The cost for registration, travel and accommodation for the General Assembly will be approximately $2000 per Councillor. Funds will be sourced from the Councillors Conference and Training Budget, in accordance with the Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy.
|
1.⇩ |
National General Assembly Discussion Paper 2023 |
|
2.⇩ |
Previous Inner West National General Assembly Motions |
|
3.⇩ |
National General Assembly Proposed Motions - Template |
|
4.⇩ |
Proposed Motion from Councillors |
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Councillor Representation on Committees
Prepared By: Beau-Jane De Costa - Senior Manager Governance and Risk
Authorised By: Kelly Loveridge - Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council determine Councillor representation on Council and External Committees until September 2024, as detailed in this report.
|
BACKGROUND
Council’s internal committees were established to provide advice and/or to exercise decision making functions in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993. Councillors can attend these meetings as observers or be appointed by Council as members of the committees with voting rights.
Council is a member of a number of external committees including Regional Organisations of Councils (ROCs), alliances and groups. Councillors can be appointed to represent Council on external committees in line with the terms of reference of each committee. The responsibility for and operation of these committees are set by the host organisation.
Information on councillor representation on committees is provided to enable a review of representation.
It is proposed that any changes made to councillor representation remain in place for the remainder of the current Council term, that is to September 2024, as opposed to only 12 months, in order to provide additional stability to the Committees, noting that at any time Council can still resolve to change a particular representative on a Committee.
Internal Committees:
|
Committee |
Charter / Purpose |
Meeting Frequency |
Current Councillor Representatives |
|
Audit, Risk & Improvement Committee ARIC |
The Committee consists of external members in accordance with the ARIC Terms of Reference. ARIC provides independent specialist assurance, audit, oversight and advice to Council. The Committee’s work supports Council to effectively discharge its responsibilities for financial reporting, risk management, internal controls, governance, improvement and internal and external audit. |
Quarterly plus option for additional Annual Financial Statements meeting |
Councillors Atkins and Scott
|
|
General Manager's Performance Assessment Panel |
The Panel and an appointed facilitator review the performance of the General Manager |
Annually |
The Mayor, Councillor Byrne, Councillors Howard and Langford |
|
Customer Service Review Sub-committee (CSRS) |
The CSRS is established to review the quality of customer service delivered by Council, provide input and clarify service expectations to improve customer experience and be more responsive to the community’s needs. The CSRS will operate until December 2023. |
Monthly meetings |
Councillor Phillipa Scott (Chair)
Councillors Zoi Tsardoulias and Kobi Shetty |
|
Flood Management Advisory Committee |
The Committee assists Council to prepare floodplain management studies and plans for the Inner West local government area. It acts as both a focus and forum for the discussion of technical, social, economic and environmental matters, and for the distillation of possibly differing viewpoints on these matters into a management plan. |
Minimum of twice a year at the Petersham Service Centre. |
Councillors Howard and Da Cruz. |
|
Local Traffic Committee
|
The Committee advises Council on traffic and parking control matters. It is primarily a technical review and advisory committee that considers the technical merits of proposals and ensures current technical guidelines are considered. It provides recommendations to Council on traffic and parking control matters and on the provision of traffic control facilities and prescribed traffic control devices for which Council has delegated authority. The Committee also advises on traffic matters arising from development applications.
|
First Tuesday of each month at the Petersham Service Centre. |
Chair, The Mayor, Councillor Byrne Alternate, Councillor Langford
|
|
Major Capital Projects Committee |
The Committee reviews, discusses and makes recommendations to Council on all major capital projects with a value over $1million. |
Monthly |
Chair, Mayor Councillor Byrne Councillors Drury, Shetty, D’Arienzo and Lockie |
External Committees
|
Name of Committee |
Charter / Purpose |
Meeting and Frequency |
Current Councillor Representation |
|
ClubGRANTS |
To identify priority projects and services within the Inner West area for local registered clubs to consider funding.
|
4-5 meetings/year on Tuesday morning |
Councillor D’Arienzo |
|
Cooks River Alliance Board |
The Cooks River Alliance is a partnership between councils in the Cooks River Catchment – Bayside, Canterbury-Bankstown, Inner West, and Strathfield. The Alliance uses the combined resources, experience, knowledge and skills within the councils and the community to address the complex environmental problems of the Cooks River and its catchment. |
Meetings are quarterly and hosted by rotating member councils. |
Councillor D’Arienzo
Councillor Langford as alternate. |
|
NSW Public Libraries Association |
The Association is the peak body for public libraries in NSW and advocates on behalf of the library sector to strengthen the public library network. |
As required. |
Councillor Howard
Councillor Langford as alternate. |
|
Parramatta River Catchment Group |
The Group is a regional organisation of local councils, State agencies and community representatives whose aim is to work together to improve the health of the Parramatta River and its catchment. |
Meetings are held quarterly on the first Thursday of March, June, September and December from 5.30pm.
The venue rotates between member councils. |
Councillor Drury
Councillor Scott as alternate. |
|
Sydney Airport Community Forum (SACF) |
SACF is the main consultation body for the Sydney Airport Long Term Operating Plan. The Forum includes representatives from the community, councils, industry and State and Federal Parliaments. |
As required |
Mayor, Councillor Byrne. |
|
Southern Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils (SSROC) |
SSROC has 12 member councils that interact, exchange ideas and work collaboratively to solve regional issues and to contribute to the future sustainability of the region. The group advocate on behalf of the region to ensure that the major issues are addressed by all levels of government. |
Meetings held quarterly on first or third Thursday evening. |
Mayor, Councillor Byrne and Councillor D'Arienzo
Councillors Da Cruz and Lockie as alternates. |
|
Sydney Coastal Council Group (SCCG) |
The SCCG promotes coordination between member councils on environmental issues relating to the sustainable management of the urban coastal and estuarine environment.
The SCCG consists of 9 Councils adjacent to Sydney’s marine and estuarine environments and associated waterways. |
Meetings are held quarterly on Saturday and hosted by rotating member council facilities.
|
Councillor Griffiths and Councillor Stephens,
Councillor Justine Langford as alternate. |
|
Sydney Eastern City Planning Panel (SECPP) |
The Panel is responsible for: • determining ‘regionally significant’ development applications (DAs) and other Major DAs and modification applications • acting as the Planning Proposal authority when directed • reviewing Planning Proposals providing advice on other planning and development matters when requested
Panel Members are remunerated in accordance with the Council resolution. |
As required.
|
The Mayor, Councillor Byrne and Deputy Mayor Councillor Scott
Five members in total, three appointed by the Minister (including an external qualified community rep) |
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The financial implications associated with the identified Committees is captured within the adopted budget.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: 2021/22 Annual Disclosure of Interest
Prepared By: Beau-Jane De Costa - Senior Manager Governance and Risk
Authorised By: Kelly Loveridge - Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the amended Annual Disclosure of Interest Return for Councillor Darcy Byrne. |
DISCUSSION
Council’s Code of Conduct requires Councillors and Designated Persons who are in positions identified by the General Manager as of 30 June to disclose any pecuniary interests in an annual return within three months of 30 June each year. If, at any time, a Councillor or Designated Person become aware of any new interests that need to be disclosed, they must submit a new return within three months of becoming aware of the interests.
Councillor Byrne has subsequently submitted an amended Disclosure which is now tabled. In addition to being publicly available on request, this return will be published on Council’s website as soon as practicable. A general redaction of all private details such as addresses has been applied to this form.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications for the tabling of disclosures of interest.
|
1.⇩ |
Disclosures by councillors and designated persons form - Mayor, Councillor Darcy Byrne - 2021-22 |
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Investment Report at 30 November 2022
Prepared By: Daryl Jackson - Chief Financial Officer
Authorised By: Kelly Loveridge - Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
BACKGROUND
A monthly investment report is provided to Council detailing the investment portfolio in terms of performance, percentage exposure of total portfolio, maturity date and changes in market value.
The monthly investment report includes details of the current proportion of investments that are non-fossil fuel investments and include details of progress in meeting the prevailing performance benchmark in respect of non-fossil fuel investments.
The investing of Council’s funds at the most favourable return available to it at the time whilst having due consideration of risk and security for that investment type and ensuring that its liquidity requirements are being met while exercising the power to invest, consideration is to be given to the preservation of capital, liquidity, and the return on investment.
Preservation of capital is the principal objective of the investment portfolio. Investments are placed in a manner that seeks to ensure security and safeguarding the investment portfolio. This includes managing credit and interest rate risk within identified thresholds and parameters.
Council determined to proactively invest in a non-fossil fuel investment portfolio.
Legislative Requirements
All investments are to comply with the following:
§ Local Government Act 1993;
§ Local Government (General) Regulation 2021;
§ Ministerial Investment Order dated 17 February 2011;
§ Local Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting;
§ Australian Accounting Standards; and
§ Division of Local Government Investment Policy Guidelines May 2010
Council’s Socially Responsible Investments consist of Green Term Deposits from otherwise fossil fuel lending banks, such as CBA and Westpac and also long dated bond issues from a range of institutions and government agencies. These investments provide targeted funding to a wide range of green and socially responsible projects and initiatives. Council also utilises these investments to remain within the credit rating policy guidelines imposed by the NSW TCorp loan covenant requirements.
Certification
The Chief Financial Officer Daryl Jackson as the Responsible Accounting Officer has certified that the investments listed in the attached report have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, Section 212 of the Local Government General Regulation 2021 and Council’s Investment Policy.
DISCUSSION
Council’s investments are held in various investment categories which are listed in the table below. Council’s investment portfolio size is $234.6m. All Socially Responsible Investments (SRI’s) are investments that comply with the Non-Fossil Fuel standards. Council’s portfolio had a return 5.31%, against the UBSWA Bank Bill Index Benchmark (3.07%) on a marked-to-market basis. For the past 12 months, the portfolio has returned 0.44% on a marked-to-market basis
Without marked-to-market influences, Council’s investment portfolio yielded 3.24%pa for the month, up from 3.00%pa in October. This is based on the actual interest rates being received on existing investments and excludes market value changes of the securities/deposits.
A further rise in interest rates during the month had a modestly detrimental impact on the valuations of Council’s fixed rate bonds and floating notes. The small decrease in their capital value was offset by the higher rate of interest being accrued on the securities.
As interest rates rise/fall the dollar valuations of existing bonds fall/rise in the market. While a bond’s (or FRN’s) market value may drop below its face value (or par value) during the life a security, providing Council does not sell the security and the issuer is sound (which all of Council’s holdings are) then the bond’s market value will come back to the face value by the time it matures.
The upside to the rising trend in interest rates is that new TDs and bonds that Council invests in will be paying a much higher rate of interest than what has been available over the past couple of years. This is evident in the rising yield on the portfolio noted above.
Change in the value of our portfolio
During November, Council had $53m across a range of 1, 6 and 12 month term deposits mature which had a weighted average weighted yield of 2.30%pa. Reflecting the sharp increase in term deposit rates since early 2022, a new investment totalling $40m was made in a 2 month CBA Green term deposit paying 3.05%pa.
· Matured:
o Suncorp $8.0m
o Westpac Group (Green TD) $5.0m
o Emerald Reverse Mortgage $23.4k (interest)
The investment market had limited non-fossil fuel products available in the month. Those available were offered with low interest rates.
Council’s entire investment portfolio remains invested in non-fossil fuel lending ADIs (47% of portfolio) and socially responsible investments (53% of portfolio).
The attachments to this report summarise all investments held by Council and interest returns for periods ending 30 November 2022.
The Current Market value is required to be accounted for. The Current Market Value is a likely outcome if Council were to consider recalling the investment prior to its due date.
All investments made for the month of November 2022 have been made in accordance with the Local Government Act, Local Government Regulations and the Inner West Council Investment Policy.
The above reflects the amount of total cash, bank and investments at 30 November 2022. All funds have been allocated as laid out in the adopted 2021/22 Operating Budget and Long Term Financial Plan.
The performance chart over the page shows Council’s rolling 12 monthly return versus benchmark over the past 5 years. Each data point is the 12 month return for the stated month end.
Domestic issues
§ Latest employment data was better than expected with a net increase in jobs double expectations and the unemployment rate dropping to 3.40%. Wage growth spiked above 3%pa with a gain of 1% over the latest three month period, the biggest jump in over 10 years.
§ Despite the increase wages growth, they remain below half the rate of inflation leading to deteriorating consumer confidence levels. The latest reading of Westpac-Melbourne Institute Consumer Sentiment index was at levels in line with the GFC and early pandemic periods.
§ The RBA continues to see risks around the future trajectory of inflation expectations. The rise in the cost of living has pushed up consumers’ short-term inflation expectations. Hence the decline in consumer confidence is occurring in parallel with, and partly being driven by, rising inflation expectations.
§ The impact of higher energy prices on domestic electricity and gas prices is now expected to be greater than envisaged earlier in the year and further increases in prices are now expected into 2023. Domestic inflation has also been boosted by flooding and other bad weather which has led to higher food prices. And there are signs of broadening domestic price pressures in service industries and rents.
Interest Rates
The market’s peak cash rate expectation dropped by 25bps over the past month, with projections falling from a 4%pa peak rate to 3.75%pa over the coming cycle:
In November, term deposit rates were little changed across the 3-12 month range while average 2-5 year rates dipped between 0.15%-0.20% versus their levels at the end of October:
|
1.⇩ |
IWC Investment Report - November 2022 |
|
2.⇩ |
IWC Economic & Investment Portfolio Commentary - November 2022 |
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Investment Report at 31 December 2022
Prepared By: Daryl Jackson - Chief Financial Officer
Authorised By: Kelly Loveridge - Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
BACKGROUND
A monthly investment report is provided to Council detailing the investment portfolio in terms of performance, percentage exposure of total portfolio, maturity date and changes in market value.
The monthly investment report includes details of the current proportion of investments that are non-fossil fuel investments and include details of progress in meeting the prevailing performance benchmark in respect of non-fossil fuel investments.
The investing of Council’s funds at the most favourable return available to it at the time whilst having due consideration of risk and security for that investment type and ensuring that its liquidity requirements are being met while exercising the power to invest, consideration is to be given to the preservation of capital, liquidity, and the return on investment.
Preservation of capital is the principal objective of the investment portfolio. Investments are placed in a manner that seeks to ensure security and safeguarding the investment portfolio. This includes managing credit and interest rate risk within identified thresholds and parameters.
Council determined to proactively invest in a non-fossil fuel investment portfolio.
Legislative Requirements
All investments are to comply with the following:
§ Local Government Act 1993;
§ Local Government (General) Regulation 2021;
§ Ministerial Investment Order dated 17 February 2011;
§ Local Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting;
§ Australian Accounting Standards; and
§ Division of Local Government Investment Policy Guidelines May 2010
Council’s Socially Responsible Investments consist of Green Term Deposits from otherwise fossil fuel lending banks, such as CBA and Westpac and also long dated bond issues from a range of institutions and government agencies. These investments provide targeted funding to a wide range of green and socially responsible projects and initiatives. Council also utilises these investments to remain within the credit rating policy guidelines imposed by the NSW TCorp loan covenant requirements.
Certification
The Chief Financial Officer Daryl Jackson as the Responsible Accounting Officer has certified that the investments listed in the attached report have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, Section 212 of the Local Government General Regulation 2021 and Council’s Investment Policy.
DISCUSSION
Council’s investments are held in various investment categories which are listed in the table below. Council’s investment portfolio size is $230.6m. All Socially Responsible Investments (SRI’s) are investments that comply with the Non-Fossil Fuel standards. Council’s portfolio had a return 2.69%, against the UBSWA Bank Bill Index Benchmark (2.98%) on a marked-to-market basis. For the past 12 months, the portfolio has returned 0.62% on a marked-to-market basis
Without marked-to-market influences, Council’s investment portfolio yielded 3.48%pa for the month, up from 3.24%pa in November. This is based on the actual interest rates being received on existing investments and excludes market value changes of the securities/deposits.
Council’s bond portfolio valuations retreated in December as long dated interest rates increased in the market. As interest rates rise/fall the dollar valuations of existing bonds fall/rise in the market. While a bond’s (or FRN’s) market value may drop below its face value (or par value) during the life a security, providing Council does not sell the security and the issuer is sound (which all of Council’s holdings are) then the bond’s market value will come back to the face value by the time it matures. The upside to the rising trend in interest rates is that new TDs and bonds that Council invests in will be paying a much higher rate of interest than what has been available over the past couple of years. This is evident in the rising yield on the portfolio noted above.
Change in the value of our portfolio
During December, Council made no new investments and had a maturity of its $4m FRN which had been paying a quarterly rate of 3mo BBSW + 0.90%pa.
Matured -
o Bank Australia (Sustainability) $4.0m
The investment market had limited non-fossil fuel products available in the month. Those available were offered with low interest rates.
Council’s entire investment portfolio remains invested in non-fossil fuel lending ADIs (47% of portfolio) and socially responsible investments (53% of portfolio).
The attachments to this report summarise all investments held by Council and interest returns for periods ending 31 December 2022.
The Current Market value is required to be accounted for. The Current Market Value is a likely outcome if Council were to consider recalling the investment prior to its due date.
All investments made for the month of December 2022 have been made in accordance with the Local Government Act, Local Government Regulations and the Inner West Council Investment Policy.
The above reflects the amount of total cash, bank and investments at 31 December 2022. All funds have been allocated as laid out in the adopted 2021/22 Operating Budget and Long Term Financial Plan.
The performance chart over the page shows Council’s rolling 12 monthly return versus benchmark over the past 5 years. Each data point is the 12 month return for the stated month end.
Council’s investment performance had reflected the downward trend in interest rate markets over recent years accelerated by pandemic related interest rate cuts. With inflation pressures building, interest rates increased sharply over much of 2022, causing negative marked-to-market returns on existing bonds and FRNs over that period, however market rates have largely stabilised of late and the higher rates being received on new investments and FRN rate resets are flowing through to the rolling 12 month figure which has gone back into positive territory and is closing the gap versus benchmark.
Domestic issues
§ Latest GDP figures showed Australia’s economy grew by 5.9%pa. Though slightly lower than expectations, it is the economy’s fourth consecutive quarterly increase after the September 2021 quarter contraction during Covid-related lockdowns.
§ Growth is being powered by household spending, which jumped by 11.8% over the year. Drilling down further, consumption was primarily driven by discretionary spending, including expenditure on hotels, cafes and restaurants (up 5.5%), transport services (up 14%) and vehicle purchases (up 10%).
§ Consumer spending is expected to slow down in early 2023 as interest rate increases take hold after the holidays. RBA data show interest and principal payments as a share of household disposable income is already above the previous high recorded in 2010. Although interest rates are lower than 2010 levels, average mortgage amounts are much higher.
§ Latest jobs data figures showed a jump in employment of 64,000 people, dramatically beating the consensus forecast for an increase of just 19,000. Full-time employment rose by about 34,200 while part-time employment increased by around 29,800 people. The unemployment rate remains near its 50 years low, at 3.4%, as fewer overseas students and other short-term visa holders coming to Australia is tightening the labour market.
Interest Rates
The RBA hiked the official cash rate another 25 basis points, from 2.85% to 3.10% at its December meeting. The RBA noted that further increases were likely over the period ahead, but the size and timing of future interest rate rises would continue to be determined by the incoming data and the Board’s assessment of the outlook for inflation and the labour market.
The market’s peak cash rate expectation increased by 25bps over the past month, with projections going from a 3.75%pa peak rate to 4%pa over the coming cycle:
In December, term deposit rates increased across the 1 month to 5 year range with the largest jumps in the 1-6 month area and in the 1 and 2 year space, where average rates were approx. 0.20%pa higher than their November levels:
|
1.⇩ |
IWC Investment Report - December 2022 |
|
2.⇩ |
IWC Economic & Investment Portfolio Commentary - December 2022 |
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Investment Report at 31 January 2023
Prepared By: Daryl Jackson - Chief Financial Officer
Authorised By: Kelly Loveridge - Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
BACKGROUND
A monthly investment report is provided to Council detailing the investment portfolio in terms of performance, percentage exposure of total portfolio, maturity date and changes in market value.
The monthly investment report includes details of the current proportion of investments that are non-fossil fuel investments and include details of progress in meeting the prevailing performance benchmark in respect of non-fossil fuel investments.
The investing of Council’s funds at the most favourable return available to it at the time whilst having due consideration of risk and security for that investment type and ensuring that its liquidity requirements are being met while exercising the power to invest, consideration is to be given to the preservation of capital, liquidity, and the return on investment.
Preservation of capital is the principal objective of the investment portfolio. Investments are placed in a manner that seeks to ensure security and safeguarding the investment portfolio. This includes managing credit and interest rate risk within identified thresholds and parameters.
Council determined to proactively invest in a non-fossil fuel investment portfolio.
Legislative Requirements
All investments are to comply with the following:
§ Local Government Act 1993;
§ Local Government (General) Regulation 2021;
§ Ministerial Investment Order dated 17 February 2011;
§ Local Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting;
§ Australian Accounting Standards; and
§ Division of Local Government Investment Policy Guidelines May 2010
Council’s Socially Responsible Investments consist of Green Term Deposits from otherwise fossil fuel lending banks, such as CBA and Westpac and also long dated bond issues from a range of institutions and government agencies. These investments provide targeted funding to a wide range of green and socially responsible projects and initiatives. Council also utilises these investments to remain within the credit rating policy guidelines imposed by the NSW TCorp loan covenant requirements.
Certification
The Chief Financial Officer Daryl Jackson as the Responsible Accounting Officer has certified that the investments listed in the attached report have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, Section 212 of the Local Government General Regulation 2021 and Council’s Investment Policy.
DISCUSSION
Council’s investments are held in various investment categories which are listed in the table below. Council’s investment portfolio size is $189.1m. All Socially Responsible Investments (SRI’s) are investments that comply with the Non-Fossil Fuel standards. Council’s portfolio had a return 6.09%, against the UBSWA Bank Bill Index Benchmark (3.18%) on a marked-to-market basis. For the past 12 months, the portfolio has returned 1.17% on a marked-to-market basis
Without marked-to-market influences, Council’s investment portfolio yielded 3.55%pa for the month, up from 3.48%pa in December. This is based on the actual interest rates being received on existing investments and excludes market value changes of the securities/deposits.
Council’s bond portfolio valuations retreated in December as long dated interest rates increased in the market. As interest rates rise/fall the dollar valuations of existing bonds fall/rise in the market. While a bond’s (or FRN’s) market value may drop below its face value (or par value) during the life a security, providing Council does not sell the security and the issuer is sound (which all of Council’s holdings are) then the bond’s market value will come back to the face value by the time it matures. The upside to the rising trend in interest rates is that new TDs and bonds that Council invests in will be paying a much higher rate of interest than what has been available over the past couple of years. This is evident in the rising yield on the portfolio noted above.
Change in the value of our portfolio
During January, Council made no new investments and had a maturity of a $40m CBA Green TD which had been paying 3.05%pa. A $1.5m 5yr Bendigo/Adelaide Bank FRN investment also matured during the month which had been paying a quarterly interest rate of 3mo BBSW +1.05%pa.
The $41.5m in matured investments were used to purchase Council’s investment property in Liverpool along with funds held in Council’s general bank account.
This has resulted in a temporary breach of the investment policy for one individual bank (Bendigo & Adelaide Bank) being 2% above its policy of 10% in the overall BBB rating category. This breach will be resolved when new funds are reinvested.
Emerald Reserve Mortgage (purchased by the legacy Marrickville Council) maturing in August 2051 and August 2056 is categorised as greater than 1 year term to maturity category continues to be outside policy.
Matured -
o Bendigo & Adelaide Bank $1.5m
o CBA (Green) $40m
The investment market had limited non-fossil fuel products available in the month. Those available were offered with low interest rates.
Council’s entire investment portfolio remains invested in non-fossil fuel lending ADIs (57% of portfolio) and socially responsible investments (33% of portfolio).
The attachments to this report summarise all investments held by Council and interest returns for periods ending 31 January 2023.
The Current Market value is required to be accounted for. The Current Market Value is a likely outcome if Council were to consider recalling the investment prior to its due date.
All investments made for the month of January have been made in accordance with the Local Government Act, Local Government Regulations and the Inner West Council Investment Policy.
The External / Internal Restrictions and Working Funds Table for January 2023 was not available at the time of publication of the business papers. This will be provided at the meeting, and will reflect the amount of total cash, bank and investments as at 31 January 2023.
All funds have been allocated as laid out in the adopted 2021/22 Operating Budget and Long-Term Financial Plan.
The performance chart over the page shows Council’s rolling 12 monthly return versus benchmark over the past 5 years. Each data point is the 12 month return for the stated month end.
Council’s investment performance had reflected the downward trend in interest rate markets over recent years accelerated by pandemic related interest rate cuts. With inflation pressures building, interest rates increased sharply over much of 2022, causing negative marked-to-market returns on existing bonds and FRNs over that period, however market rates have largely stabilised of late and the higher rates being received on new investments and FRN rate resets are flowing through to the rolling 12 month figure which has gone back into positive territory and is closing the gap versus benchmark.
Domestic issues
§ Latest inflation data showed an increase of 7.8% for calendar year 2022, a bit higher than economists’ projection of 7.5% and the highest annual reading since 1990. Excluding the most volatile price movements, the trimmed mean, came in at 6.9%, higher than the RBA’s expectations.
§ The biggest price rises for households over the last three months of last year were for domestic holiday travel and accommodation (up 13%), electricity (up 8.6%) and international travel (up 7.6%).
§ Over the course of 2022, housing (+10.7%), food (+9.2%), and recreation and culture (+9%) had the steepest price increases.
§ Economists expect the increase in inflation will likely keep the RBA on pace to raise rates over the next two months followed by a pause in rate hikes in April.
Interest Rates
There was no RBA monetary policy meeting in January. At its December meeting RBA noted that further increases were likely over the period ahead, but the size and timing of future interest rate rises would continue to be determined by the incoming data and the Board’s assessment of the outlook for inflation and the labour market.
The market’s peak cash rate expectation increased by 25bps over the past month, with projections going from a 4%pa peak rate to 3.75%pa over the coming cycle:
In January, term deposit rates increased across the 1–9 month range by an average of 7bps from last month while long dated rates across 2-5 years fell back by an average of 30bps in reaction to the market’s long term inflation/rate outlook:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION AS AT 10 FEBRUARY 2023
The monthly Investment Report to Council includes a table showing the External / Internal Restrictions and Working Funds at the end of each month. At the time of publishing the January 2023 Investment Report this information was not available because the January month end process was still in progress. Please now see below the updated information as at end January 2023.
All funds have been allocated as laid out in the adopted 2021/22 Operating Budget and Long-Term Financial Plan.
|
1.⇩ |
IWC Investment Report - January 2023 |
|
2.⇩ |
IWC Economic & Investment Porfolio Commentary - January 2023 |
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Impact of Airbnb on rental housing supply
Prepared By: Daniel East - Acting Senior Manager Planning
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note this report. |
DISCUSSION
At its Ordinary Council meeting on 25 October 2022 Council resolved:
1. Council prepares a report investigating the impact of Airbnb and similar operations on the housing supply, affordability and the local community. The report is to consider options for properties primarily used for short-term letting including options for rate variations or other appropriate responses; and
2. The report considers best practice across NSW particularly in areas where short-term letting is exacerbating housing shortages and affordability.
The impact of Airbnb on the availability of rental housing is shown in the table below.
|
Local Government Area |
Total dwellings in LGA* |
No. of rental dwellings in LGA> |
Whole dwelling Airbnb’s in LGA^ |
%Airbnb’s as a proportion of rental dwellings |
Residential vacancy rate# |
|
City of Sydney |
117,429 |
62,678 |
3,245 |
5.2% |
3.4% |
|
Inner West |
74,288 |
32,485 |
858 |
2.6% |
1.3% |
|
Waverley |
30,496 |
13,456 |
2,000 |
14.9% |
1.3% |
|
Randwick |
58,300 |
23,875 |
1,076 |
4.5% |
1.3% |
|
Canada Bay |
38,400 |
13,062 |
147 |
1.1% |
1.3% |
|
Byron Shire |
11,250 |
3,907 |
2,470 |
63.2% |
0.9% |
*source: latest Local Housing Strategy/Study for the
LGA
>source: ABS 2021 census
^source: insideairbnb.com
#source: SQM research,
October 2022
These figures show that Airbnb is having less impact on the availability of long-term rental dwellings within the Inner West when compared to tourist areas.
State and Local Government responses
The NSW State Government has restricted non-hosted short term rental accommodation (STRA) to a maximum of 180 days per year in the Greater Sydney region (not including the Central Coast), Ballina area and Byron area as well as certain areas within the Clarence Valley and Muswellbrook regions.
The 180-day period is counted within an annual period, 12 months from the initial registration date on the NSW STRA Register. If a non-hosted STRA in these areas exceeds the 180-day limit, STRA is no longer permitted under the state policy as exempt development and development consent would be required to continue the use.
While the NSW government has acted to lessen the impact of STRAs, it is evident that these changes do not directly tackle the impact of Airbnb and similar short-term letting platforms on the availability and affordability of long-term rental properties in high demand locations.
A number of Councils have either investigated or undertaken measures to encourage the return of non-hosted STRA to the long-term residential market.
Of particular note are Byron Shire Council’s proposal to further restrict non-hosted STRA to 90 days per year. The Minister for Planning and Homes recently withdrew delegation from Byron Shire Council to finalise the associated planning proposal so that advice could be sought from the Independent Planning Commission (IPC) on the potentially significant economic impacts the proposal could have on local businesses. Advice from the IPC will be sought on:
· the status of housing and rental affordability and rental availability in the Byron Shire, including the impact of non-hosted STRA as well as recent flood events
· recommendations to improve housing affordability and rental availability in the Byron Shire
· the economic contribution of the STRA industry in Byron Shore and any potential economic implications of this proposal for Byron Shire
· whether any further information is required.
Eurobodalla Shire Council also attempted to return STRA’s and holiday homes to the long-term rental market after the 2019-20 bushfires by writing to the owners.
CONCLUSION
The impacts that Airbnb’s currently have on rental stock within Inner West and the options to address them are currently limited.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Nil.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Arts Summit - Update and Draft Report for
Endorsement
Prepared By: Vikki Woods - Senior Events Specialist
Authorised By: Ruth Callaghan - Director Community
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
DISCUSSION
At the Council meeting on 13 September 2022, Councillors received and noted the facilitator’s report on the Arts Summit which was held on 2 June 2022 and requested the following:
1. As resolved at the March 2022 Ordinary Council meeting, direct officers to commence immediate development of the Inner West Council Arts and Music Recovery Plan. The Plan is to be informed by the priorities of the Summit and developed in consultation with key stakeholders, including Council’s Arts and Cultural Advisory Group, and tabled at the December Ordinary Council meeting.
2.. Noting alignment of many of the Summit’s priorities with Council’s current Living Arts program and Cultural Strategy, endorse the following initiatives from the Summit for immediate action:
a) Commence a review of all upcoming EOIs and bookings for Council events to ensure maximum use of local artists and venues, including the Marrickville Festival, Inner West Film Festival, World Pride activations, and the Perfect Match program.
b) Reaffirm commitment to Council’s Outdoor Activation program and Public Art program, noting Council’s commitment to increase Perfect Match funding by 20%.
c) Undertake a creative spaces audit and study to identify appropriate spaces across the LGA for creative and rehearsal use, including activation of all eight town halls within the LGA modelled on the Marrickville Town Hall conversion pilot.
d) Commence scoping to establish a “concierge matching” service to match artists with spaces, using the Perfect Match model as a template, to build on the audit of creative spaces.
e) Noting the opportunities to support local artists and music venues under the pilot Special Entertainment Precinct on Enmore Road, commence scoping works to identify other potential locations to pilot SEPs in the LGA including Marrickville Road, Darling St, and Norton St.
f) Noting Council’s submission to the National Cultural Policy, identify opportunities for further advocacy work to shape state and federal arts and culture policy, including writing to relevant state and federal ministers regarding the Inner West Council Arts and Music Recovery Plan.
All the initiatives requested by Council in the resolution above are being actioned and have been incorporated in the initiatives in response to report of the Arts Summit. In December 2022, Council received a report on progress in developing the Arts and Music Recovery Plan. Council requested the draft Plan be brought to the next meeting on 14 February 2023. The Draft Plan is attached.
The draft plan incorporates the resolutions made by Council as well as addressing the specific issues raised by the creative sector as presented in the report of the Arts Summit by the external facilitator. Staff have consulted with key stakeholders in the creative sector regarding outcomes from the Arts Summit. All the specific initiatives in the draft Arts and Music Recovery Plan reflect that consultation. Senior Council officers met with Kerri Glasscock, CEO of Sydney Fringe Festival who was a major partner in delivering the Summit, as well as other industry stakeholders including Council’s Arts and Culture Advisory Group and Create NSW. New initiatives identified in the draft Plan have been developed in response to consultation with the advisory group and their suggestions.
As the report of the Arts Summit notes, some of the major issues raised by the sector on the day (such as a “livable wage” for creatives and placing Aboriginal artists and culture at the center of national arts policy) are the policy, funding or legislative responsibility of the State or Federal Governments. The draft Plan attached responds directly to the issues and suggestions made at the summit that are within the responsibility and influence of Inner West Council to deliver on as a local government agency. However, Council will also continue to identify opportunities to actively engage with the creative community of the inner west to work with and advocate to Federal and State agencies and identify and action coordinated responses.
On 30 January 2023 the Federal Government launched Australia’s Cultural Policy for the next five years, Revive. It is structured around 5 pillars:
1. First Nations First
2. A Place for Every Story
3. Centrality of the Artist
4. Strong Cultural Infrastructure
5. Engaging the Audience
The Director Community and Council officers are currently examining Revive to ensure that further development of Council’s initiatives put forward in the Draft Arts and Music Recovery Plan are consistent with this new national policy framework. Notably, it includes a commitment to “re-establish intergovernmental meetings between Commonwealth, State and Territory cultural Ministers and the Australian Local Government Association”. This is a major commitment, as it will give the local government sector a seat at the policy table and an opportunity to influence decision making on arts policy and potentially funding.
Next Steps
It is proposed that Council note the attached draft report and that officers do further work to refine the initiatives, identify any potential costs of implementation and timing of delivery with the Arts Advisory Group so that a final Plan can be brought to Council for endorsement in April 2023.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Nil at this stage.
|
1.⇩ |
Draft Inner West Arts and Music Recovery Plan |
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Update to the Land Register
Prepared By: Scott Mullen - Strategic Investments and Property Manager
Authorised By: Kelly Loveridge - Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
BACKGROUND
At its Council meeting on 2 November 2021, Council resolved:
That Council to report on:
1. A plan to update the Land and Property Register;
2. Provide summary financial and statistical detail about the status of the register;
3. Publish the register in a format that can be copied and pasted;
4. Identify how the register can be kept up to date; and
5. Identify how changes to the register can be reported to Councillors
This report outlines the steps undertaken to review the existing Land Register that is currently published on Council’s website, to address the requirements of the Council resolution and provides an updated Land Register which will be published on council’s website.
DISCUSSION
Requirements of the Local Government Act 1993
The Local Government Act 1993 (the Act) requires that Council establish a Land Register (Register).
S53 The council’s land register
(1) A council is required to keep a register of all land vested in it or under its control.
(2) The register must include the following -
· the name (if any) by which the land is known
· the address or location of the land
· the reference to title of the land
· the name of the owner of the land
· whether or not the land is Crown land
· the classification under this Part of the land
· whether or not there is a plan of management for the land
· the zoning (if any) of the land under an environmental planning instrument
· particulars of any agreement (including any lease or licence) entered into by the council with respect to the land.
REVIEW OF 2018 LAND REGISTER
In March 2022 a review of the current Land Register was initiated to assess the currency of the register and identify any non-compliance with the Act.
NSW Land Registry Service
NSW Land Registry Services (LRS) operates the NSW land titles registry for the State Government and the people of New South Wales. The land titles registry underpins the state’s secure, efficient and guaranteed system of land ownership. LRS create and maintain land titles information and provide land information products and services.
As part of the review, and to ensure that Council had the most up to date and accurate property related information, a request was made to LRS to provide all land title information in the name of Inner West Council and of predecessor councils including Ashfield, Balmain, Leichhardt, Marrickville, Newtown, Petersham & St Peters councils.
Utilising the data extract from NSW Land Registry Services can be regarded as a ‘source of truth’ for the land owned and managed by Council.
The LRS data extract provided the following:
· 379 parcels more than the 2018 register;
· identified 1079 separate parcels in the name of IWC or its predecessor councils;
· identified 79 parcels currently registered at LRS in the name of Inner West council and 986 parcels in the name of Inner West council’s predecessors.
Crown Lands
Inner West Council has accepted responsibility for the care, control and management of Crown land within the LGA.
At council’s request, Crown Lands supplied its current list of Crown land that was reviewed against the 2018 Register.
The proposed 2023 Land Register includes Crown Land’s list of reserves within the Inner West Council LGA including those directly under council’s management, reserves devolved to Council and reserves managed by the Minister.
NSW Department of Planning and Environment (DPE)
The proposed 2023 Land Register reflects the DPE sites currently under council’s care, control and management. Those sites have been verified as owned by the ‘Planning Ministerial Corporation’ (PMC) or under that corporation’s previous iterations such as ‘the Minister administering the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979’ or ‘Planning NSW’.
KEY IMPROVEMENTS TO 2023 LAND REGISTER
Compliance with the Local Government Act 1993 (The Act)
The Register is fully compliant with the Act including details related to council’s Plans of Management.
Data Integration
The proposed register integrates related land and property data previously held in multiple, unconnected databases.
Data Validation (confirmed against external sources of truth).
Data extracts were obtained from:
· NSW Land Registry Services (LRS)
· NSW Crown Lands
· NSW Department of Planning and Environment (DPIE)
The data was cross referenced against the existing Register and updated.
Ownership and Land title Information
The proposed Register reflects properties acquired in the name of Ashfield, Leichhardt and Marrickville councils plus their predecessor councils which includes Annandale, Balmain, Petersham and St Peters councils.
It also includes land that the City of Sydney is to transfer to Inner West Council, but which are now registered on title in the name of the City of Sydney. The current land register incorrectly shows these lands in the name of Inner West Council.
To determine the sites to be transferred, council is presently auditing the 1967 Gazettal and has opened negotiations with the City of Sydney to finalise a list of transfer sites.
For two sites, the City of Sydney has undertaken to lodge LRS’ 11R Request Forms.
Care, Control & Management
The revised Register incorporates data obtained from Crown Lands and DPIE in early 2022.
Additional information
As well as satisfying the requirements of the Act, the register includes information that is important for the operation and management of the land by Council and includes:
· Ward
· Ownership as identified by NSW Lands Registry Service
· Reserve name, number and date of gazette
· Property Number (GIS), Land ID (GIS) and area m2 (if available)
IWC Geographic Information System (GIS)
The register displays information available in GIS (Property Number, Land ID, Address & Area m2) where it is available. The Property Number serves as a unique identifier across council’s systems.
The Property Team continue to collaborate with the GIS Team to ensure the information is accurate and up to date.
As this is an internal operational tool it will not be published on council’s website.
Future Updates
The register will be published in both a PDF and Excel format (with security) to allow the community to download and extract required information.
The register will be updated on an annual basis in the month of July. It is intended to prepare a Briefing Note to Councillors detailing the updates made prior to publication on the website.
Update to land title records in 2023
Council will apply to NSW Land Registry Services to amend all land owned by council and currently in different titles (986 identified parcels) now registered at LRS in the name of predecessor councils (such as Ashfield, Balmain, Leichhardt, Marrickville, Newtown, Petersham & St Peters councils) into the name of Inner West Council.
Summary
Below is a summary of the data related to the updated register.
· 1079 individual parcels of land owned by Council
· 263 individual parcels of land managed by Council
· 1342 total individual parcels of land owned or managed by Council
· 89 legal agreements (lease, licence, contracts etc) with tenants who occupy land owned or managed by Council
· $5,333,057 annual income (projected in FY 2023/24 draft budget) derived from land owned or managed by Council under a legal agreement (and does not include hire fees from venues, sporting grounds, permits or any other source).
Note: The Land Register includes the newly acquired investment property (leases and income).
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Nil.
|
1.⇩ |
Proposed Land Register |
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Update on Town Halls
Prepared By: Scott Mullen - Strategic Investments and Property Manager
Authorised By: Kelly Loveridge - Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
DISCUSSION
This report provides an update on the activities that are currently being undertaken to activate Council’s town halls.
Background
There have been a number of resolutions made by Council in relation to the use of town halls, as summarised below.
At its Council meeting on 8 September 2020, Council resolved that:
Pending project feasibilities, undertakes a further Expression of Interest Campaigns for the use of the Petersham Town Hall (office space for co-located community groups) and Marrickville Town Hall (Live Music venue);
and
The Marrickville Town Hall and Petersham Town Hall EOI’s be tabled at Council for adoption prior to undertaking the EOI
At its Council meeting on 12 April 2022, Council resolved in part:
That Council recommences work to convert Marrickville Town Hall and former Marrickville Library into a hub for multicultural performance and live music
At its Council meeting on 14 June 2022, Council resolved to:
Reaffirm its commitment to establishing an Inner West Pride Centre at Newtown Town Hall;
And
Establish a sub-committee to advise the establishment of the Centre
At the 13 December 2022 Council meeting, Council resolved to:
Work with the Marrickville Town Hall Steering Committee to host an Open Day no later than February 2023, inviting local artists, creative organisations and entities, and organisations working in multicultural performance to tour the Hall, provide valuable feedback and ideas about possible creative uses, and learn more about Council’s plan for the venue;
Use this Open Day as a model for similar open days to be held at all other town halls no later than March 2023;
Include an Open Day at Newtown Town Hall, including an information session for LGBTQ+ organisations, as part of World Pride 2023;
Report to Council about progress in the activation of Town Halls in February 2023, and then bi-monthly (April, June, August, October, December 2023);
Immediately promote the Expression of Interest - Creative Use of Council Venues on all Council channels, including the next newsletter, on social media and other channels, by letter to all creative organisations and individuals within the Local Government Area and to all those who have applied for Council grants or engaged with the Arts Summit process; and
Include an update and analysis on the Expression of Interest - Creative Use of Council Venues process as part of the February 2023 Report.
MARRICKVILLE TOWN HALL
Steering Committee
A steering committee (SteerCo) has been established to drive the engagement and planning for further activation. Chaired by Clr Howard and consisting of the Chair (or representative) of the Inner West Council Multicultural Advisory Committee and Inner West Council Arts and Culture Advisory Committee, community representatives, and relevant staff.
The SteerCo is meeting monthly to investigate strategies to provide short-term residencies at the Town Hall for local artists, not-for-profit creative organisations, and organisations from local Culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities. Planned meetings are as follows:
· Monday, 20 February 2023
· Monday, 20 March 2023
· Monday, 17 April 2023
· Monday, 15 May 2023
· Monday, 19 June 2023
· Monday, 17 July 2023
Permissible use as a live music and entertainment venue
Council staff have appointed a Town Planner to assess the requirements for Marrickville Town Hall to be used for the purposes of a Live Music and Entertainment Venue. Advice has been provided that the most appropriate planning pathway to allow for non-permissible land uses (including commercial premises, entertainment facility and/or function centre) is an amendment to the LEP for additional permitted uses to apply to the Town Hall. This can be achieved by a Planning Proposal for an amendment to the IWLEP 2022 for additional permitted use listing under Schedule 1 that applies to 303 Marrickville Road, Marrickville (Marrickville Town Hall) including commercial premises, entertainment facility and/or function centre uses at the site.
Subject to the Planning Proposal, Gateway Determination and amendment to the LEP this
would ensure that the land uses are permissible and provide a clear pathway under future Development Applications for the associated uses. This process is likely to take up to 12 months.
Preservation of current use
Under any proposal, existing bookings would be preserved, regular hirers from local community groups supported and the ongoing use of the Town Hall for civic purposes ensured.
Open Day
An open day has been organized for Saturday 18 February from 11am to 1pm inviting local artists, creative organisations and entities, and organisations working in multicultural performance to tour the Hall, provide valuable feedback and ideas about possible creative uses, and learn more about Council’s plan for the venue.
NEWTOWN TOWN HALL
Inner West Pride Centre
A Council PCG has been established to manage the development and delivery of the Inner West Pride Centre, sponsored by the Director Community.
A subcommittee has been established to meet monthly and advise on the establishment of the Pride Centre. It will provide expert input to the PCG on key elements of the Pride Centre. The subcommittee is chaired by Clr Howard, and consists of Clr Atkins (Alternate Chair), Clr D’Arienzo, three community representatives from the LGBTIQ Working Group and relevant Council staff. Its role is to:
a. Review the former Expression of Interest process (which was unsuccessful).
b. Conduct a scoping study to determine a sustainable operating model that advances the vision of the Pride Centre whilst ensuring ongoing community access to Newtown Town Hall.
c. Establish principles, objectives, and activities for the Inner West Pride Centre.
d. Prepare for a renewed Expression of Interest process for the second half of 2022.
Planned meetings for 2023 are as follows:
· Monday, 27 February
· Monday, 27 March
· Monday, 17 April
· Monday, 15 May
· Monday, 19 June
· Monday, 17 July
World Pride 2023
Implementation of the 8 March 2022 council resolutions for a rainbow pathway and the programming for Sydney World Pride 2023 in the Inner West is well underway.
The design for the infrastructure works and upgrade of Pride Square, adjacent to Newtown Town Hall, have been finalised and approved by the committee. This includes seating arrangements so that community can congregate and participate in the arts and culture activations to be delivered for World Pride, as well as a “beacon”, a sculptural installation that will be visible from different angles of entry from King Street. The new design and upgrade of the square is already funded through the existing infrastructure budget.
Open Day
An open Day is proposed for Saturday 4 March and will include an information session for LGBTQ+ organisations, as part of World Pride 2023.
PETERSHAM TOWN HALL
Relocation of Council staff
Most of the ground floor and part of the first-floor rooms currently accommodate council staff undertaking administrative functions.
A staff co-location program is currently being undertaken across council’s administrative centres and staff will be relocated from the Town Hall to other service centres in early 2023.
Once this has been finalised staff will use the results of the ‘Creative Use Of Council Venues’ pilot program outlined below to activate Petersham, Annandale, St Peters and Leichhardt Town Halls.
VENUES FOR HIRE
All the Town Halls are currently available for hire as part of Councils ‘Venues for Hire’ program through the website at Venues for hire - Inner West Council
Council provides a scaled fee structure for the hire of indoor venues.
The policy regarding scaled fees for community resources is underpinned by the need for them to be affordable and accessible for not-for-profit (NFP) groups.
Categories such as access and affordability for local residents; health and wellbeing benefits of the activity; the necessity of Council support to enable activities to proceed; and the extent to which the activity aligns with Council's strategic priorities are therefore reflected in the scaled fee structure.
Indoor venues fee scale policy - Inner West Council (nsw.gov.au)
EXPRESSION OF INTEREST - CREATIVE USE OF COUNCIL VENUES
As part of the program to activate council’s Town Halls Council a pilot program has been established for individuals or organisations wishing to use Council venues for cultural activities.
The community is encouraged to visit Council’s website at the link below and fill out the Expression of Interest (EOI) form with details of their proposal.
https://www.innerwest.nsw.gov.au/explore/venues-for-hire/creative-use-of-council-venues
Summary of outcomes
· As of 31 January 2023, Council has received 39 responses (Attachment 1)
· The range of proposed uses was for performance (16), rehearsal (21) and various other uses including art therapy, mental health training, language and art classes, music lessons and visual artist residencies
· The preferred use of a town hall was spread generally across the LGA
It is proposed that the information collected from the EOI and the pilot program will be used to develop a long-term strategy that will provide ongoing use of council’s venues that is inclusive, accessible, and equitable.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Nil impact at this stage.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Notice of Motion to Rescind: C1122(1) Item 21 Notice of Motion: Council Advertising and Inner West News
From: Councillors Kobi Shetty, Liz Atkins and Justine Langford
|
MOTION
We, the abovementioned Councillors, hereby submit a Notice of Motion to rescind the resolution of Council of 8 November 2022 being:
That Council: 1. Taking into consideration any formal contractual obligations Council has direct all our advertising expenditure to the Inner West Council Newsletters and Social Media; 2. Increase the number of Inner West Council Newsletters by one, taking the total number of editions to eleven per year; and 3. Upgrade the 14 community noticeboards
and propose the alternative resolution be adopted as follows:
That: 1. Subject to the cost of continued advertising with City Hub for the remainder of the trial period agreed by Council in April 2022, direct our remaining advertising expenditure to the Inner West Council Newsletters and Social Media; 2. At the end of that trial period, receive a report from staff evaluating the effectiveness of Council’s advertising; 3. Council upgrade the 14 community noticeboards; and 4. The budget required to re-engage the City Hub, be sourced by reducing the Inner West Council Newsletters to their original 10 editions instead of 11 editions.
|
Background
At Council’s April 2022 Ordinary Meeting, as a result of a tender process, Council resolved to commence a weekly news page in Inner West Review and City Hub for a trial period of one year. Inner West Review ceased publication on 27 July 2022. As a result, the question of advertising was brought back to the Ordinary Council meeting of 8 November 2022.
Council resolved in part on 8 November 2022 that Council:
1. Taking into consideration any formal contractual obligations Council has direct all our advertising expenditure to the Inner West Council Newsletters and Social Media;
After this resolution was passed, City Hub was informed that Council would no longer be advertising with it. City Hub’s print version appears monthly and the last month in which Council advertising appeared was November 2022.
This has had the result that there is no advertising in any media other than the Council newsletter and on social media. In theory the Inner West Council Newsletter will reach every household in the Inner West. However, there is good reason why Council would want its advertising to reach a broader audience, e.g. events and opportunities in the Inner West.
Part of Council’s consideration must be supporting local news outlets. City Hub is the only surviving regular local news outlet. It is an independent publication and is free of charge. The original decision of Council in April 2022 decided on the basis of the information available to it to give City Hub a 12 month trial, along with Inner West Review. The subsequent cessation of publication of the Inner West Review is not a reason to cease to advertise in City Hub. The confidential report to council in November 2022 did not consider whether advertising in City Hub should continue, presumably because the 12 month trial period decided on in April had not concluded. The report to the November meeting stated that it was the money saved from closure of the Inner West Review that was proposed to be used to produce one extra Inner West Council Newsletter and to upgrade the suburban community noticeboards.
Council’s advertising has dual purposes: communicating with the Inner West Community and promoting the Inner West as a destination. Feedback from some businesses is that we could be better promoting Enmore and Leichhardt in particular. Councillors would benefit from a report which evaluates whether this feedback is correct considering the use of advertising in various forms, such as media, social media, banners, bus advertising.
Advice from staff is that implementation of the new 1(a) could be done in accordance with the procurement framework.
Staff have also advised that the budget required to re-engage the City Hub has been transferred to providing an 11th Inner West newsletter, in accordance with the 8 November 2022 resolution, however Council can fund the proposed new resolution by reverting to 10 newsletters a year instead of 11.
Officer’s Comment:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Tree Management in Pioneer Park
From: Councillor John Stamolis
|
MOTION
That Council receive a report on tree health and tree management at Pioneer Park to the April 2023 Council meeting. This will include a general assessment and report on tree health as well as plans for the replacement of any trees which have been removed.
|
Background
Council to prepare a summary report on tree management at Pioneer Park in response to recent questions raised by park users.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Request for update on Transport for NSW (Roads) deliverables
From: Councillor Marghanita Da Cruz
|
MOTION
That Council write to the Minister for Transport requesting: 1. A traffic study be undertaken to improve traffic conditions on Wolseley St and Dobroyd Parade be undertaken following TfNSW’s decision to retain the closure of Northcote Street at Parramatta Road, Haberfield which has impacted amenity in these adjacent streets; 2. Implementation of 40km/h speed limit in Haberfield West - the area between Dobroyd Parade (West) Wattle Street, Martin Street and Parramatta Road including Ramsay Street; 3. An update on the creation of new Public Transport Lanes on Parramatta Road between Norton Street Leichhardt and Burwood Road. (condition of Westconnex Stage 1); 4. Implementation of High Pedestrian Activity Area (HPAA) including reduction of Speed Limit in Haberfield Village on Ramsay Street and Dalhousie Street (as promised in 2019); 5. Priority for the Speed Limit reduction Frederick Street (due August 2022 ) and upgrading pedestrian safety when crossing Frederick Street, Ashfield particularly at John Street, following the death of a Pedestrian on the at grade markings; 6. Information regarding the Future of the Cove Street Depot Haberfield, between Dobroyd Parade and Dobroyd Canal; 7. Provision of an additional Pedestrian Crossing leg across Parramatta Road, on the Western Side of the intersection of Parramatta Road and Frederick Street, Ashfield; 8. Approval to commence the PRUAIP-New cycleway from Parramatta Road to Mallet Street, Annandale; 9. Investigation on the Crescent Annandale to provide a safe and continuous bike path; and 10. Attention to both legal and illegal right hand turns into and out of Darley Road to streets and laneways between William St and City West Link which results in State Road traffic rat running through the local road network.
|
Background
Stages 1 & 2a of Westconnex have now opened.
Points 1 & 2 Wolsely Street and Dobroyd Parade & 40k speed limit in Haberfield West
Transport for NSW is proposing to keep Northcote Street closed at Parramatta Road, Haberfield. See Attachment 1.
TfNSW will separately need to undertake an Operational Road Network Performance Review within 12 months and five (5) years after the commencement of operation of the various stages of WestConnex so there will be further reviews of traffic in the area undertaken. MOD 7 - Northcote Street Closure | Planning Portal - Department of Planning and Environment (nsw.gov.au) https://pp.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/major-projects/projects/mod-7-northcote-street-closure
Residents inform us that “Proposed changes to Northcote to make it a cul-de-sac have been approved, what the residents of Wolseley Street want is a resolution that does not involve keeping our street as a main thoroughfare for people wanting to get to Ashfield.
Traffic has tripled in the past 7 years and has now become intolerable. Residents maintain “The report on the traffic assessment is flawed in that the traffic assessment has been made on the capacity of the local roads and road network performance which is not the issue. The issue is that there has been a very noticeable impact on the amenity of Wolseley St residents. Regardless of whether the street has the capacity for a certain number of vehicles, there has been an increase in the use of Wolseley St as a rat-run off Ramsey and the permanent closure of Northcote will continue this loss of amenity. Prior to the changes, accessing Frederick St via the left turn across three lanes on Parramatta Road was by exception when a driver mistakenly used Wolseley St. It is not reasonable to determine that because the change has been in place since 2016 that the current traffic patterns are now the norm.
The traffic impact assessment detailed in Section 5.2.2.1 of the MOD 7 - Northcote Street Closure Report concluded that keeping Northcote Street in its current configuration, key surrounding intersections will continue to operate satisfactorily during peak periods and it is not expected to result in any adverse impacts on traffic capacity or road network performance, including Wolseley Street.”
Officer advise not preempting the traffic and that closure of the streets would significantly impact accessibility for residents and should not be the only option considered. Traffic calming or some movement bans may also achieve the desired outcomes.
Point 3 Public Transport Lanes Parramatta Road
Public Transport Lanes on Parramatta Road have not been delivered despite the opening of Westconnex Stage 1, some time ago, and the recent opening of Westconnex Stage 2a (M7-M8 link)
Westconnex Stage 1 Condition B34 Consistent with the modelling contained in the documents referred to in condition A2(b), the Sydney CBD to Parramatta Strategic Transport Plan (Transport for NSW, 2015, or as updated) and in consultation with Transport for NSW, at least two lanes of Parramatta Road, from Burwood Road to Haberfield, are to be solely dedicated for the use of public transport unless an alternative dedicated public transport route that provides an improved public transport outcome for the area, when compared to two dedicated public transport lanes on Parramatta Road, is approved by the Secretary. - pg 18-19 (attachment 2), WestConnex Stage 1 - M4 East SSI 6307 NSW Government, Department of Planning and Environment SSI 6307 MOD 1 approved 15 December 2016, SSI 6307 MOD 2 approved 10 January 2017, SSI 5307 Mod 3 approved 16 June 2017.
Point 4 High Pedestrian Activity Haberfield Village
2019 Correspondence from Transport for NSW FT19/05079 “You will be aware that Roads and Maritime Services is currently implementing a 40km/h high pedestrian activity area (HPAA) in Haberfield Town Centre”
Point 5 Speed Limit Reduction on Frederick St (promised August 2022)
There have been ongoing delays in the implementation of a Speed Reduction on Frederick St a measure to increase pedestrian safety following the Death on the Crossing at John St. This was promised to be implemented by the end of August 2022.
There have not been any improvements to the at grade (not raised) pedestrian crossing either. This crossing is used by school students, bus users, cyclists and walkers.
· “Speed zone reduction
As part of network safety improvements, the speed limit on Frederick Street and
Milton
Street, between Parramatta Road and Georges River Road will be reduced from
60km/h to 50km/h. The red-light speed camera at the intersection of Liverpool
Road
will also be adjusted.
We will notify you before these changes are put in place.” -
Proposed safety upgrade of Frederick Street and John Street, Ashfield, Have
Your Say | October 2022 Transport for NSW is taking action to improve
safety around the intersection of Frederick Street and John Street, Ashfield.
We are seeking feedback on the proposed options and you can have you say by 28
October 2022. See attachment 3.
· Frederick Street Ashfield, safety upgrade Community consultation
summary
December 2022. See attachment 4.
· Minutes of November Traffic Committee Meeting LTC1122(1) Item 10 Update on improvements to the Frederick Street, Ashfield crossing
The TfNSW representative advised that community consultation for the proposed signalisation of the Frederick Street pedestrian crossing closed last month. The majority of respondents supported the signalisation of the crossing at John Street and Frederick Street. TfNSW have received Council’s submission which will also inform the development of the signalised crossing. A formal consultation report will be ready by the end of this month. See attachment 5.
Point 6. Former Ashfield Council Depot on 321 Parramatta Road, Haberfield
This site is within the scope of the Iron Cove Creek Pedestrian and Cycle Link linking the Bay Run to Ashfield Pool. It was a compulsorarily acquired by Transport for NSW in November 2019.
Property Acquistion: Vacant council land, 321
Parramatta Road Haberfield NSW 2046
Owner: Ashfield Council, 260 Liverpool Road, Ashfield NSW 2131 - Parramatta
Road and Great North Road, Five Dock, Proposed intersection upgrade Community
and stakeholder engagement plan. See attachment 6.
|
C1119(1) Item
24 Compulsory Acquisition
Ashfield, Part 321 Parramatta |
|
Motion: (Drury/McKenna OAM)
THAT:
1. The
Resolution of Council dated 21 August 2018 Item 26 - C0818(2) be altered to
read “4. The negotiated terms be no less than $447,925 net and that the
clean-up costs be borne 100% by the RMS.”; and 2. Council delegate authority to the CEO to finalise the terms of an agreement to compensation by way of Deed of Release and Indemnity for Lot 13 Deposited Plan 1250227 known as No. 321 Parramatta Road Haberfield with a claim for compensation in accordance with the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (the Act) for a net sum of not less than $407,663.
|
|
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Byrne, Da Cruz, Drury, Kiat, Lockie, Macri, McKenna OAM, Passas, Porteous, Raciti, Stamolis, Steer and York Against Motion: Nil |
Point 7 Additional Pedestrian Crossing at the lights on Parramatta Road, at Wattle St.
There is no pedestrian crossing across Parramatta Road on the Western side of this multilane intersection at Frederick/Wattle Streets. This means pedestrians and cyclists have to make additional crossing to get to their destination. This will significantly improve Pedestrian and Cyclist amenity in crossing at the Intersection.
Point 8 Parramatta Road Urban Amenity Improvement Program (PRUAIP)-New cycleway on Pyrmont Bridge Road from Parramatta Road to Mallet Street, Annandale
Our website advises:“ Council officers are co-ordinating with TfNSW for the construction commencement date;”
The commencement was pending work at the Mallet St dive site being completed. The Westconnex Dive Site Shed at that location has now been removed.
More about the proposed works at https://www.innerwest.nsw.gov.au/develop/council-run-works-and-projects/park-building-and-road-projects/upcoming-and-ongoing-projects/pruaip-camperdown-cycle-way
Point 9 Bike Lane on The Crescent, Annandale
Leichhardt Bicycle User Group advise: “Will TfNSW ever get round to removing this dangerous shoulder through the roundabout on The Crescent at Nelson St? It looks like a Bike Lane but isnt, and ends at legally parked cars, forcing a cyclist out into the road.” also “short bit of bike lane signed and marked across Trafalgar St that ends when car parking resumes. “
Point 10 Darley Road
The community advises that vehicles take travel along the narrow laneways and Streets between Charles St and City West Link making illegal right hand turns into Darley Road approaching City West Link. Cars travelling into and out of the Dan Murphy’s located on Darley Road also cross Darley Road into these Streets and Laneways.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
|
1.⇩ |
Northcote Street Consultation Plan Approved |
|
2.⇩ |
WestConnex Stage 1 - M4 East SSI 6307 NSW Government, Department of Planning and Environment SSI 6307 MOD 1 approved 15 December 2016, SSI 6307 MOD 2 approved 10 January 2017, SSI 5307 Mod 3 approved 16 June 2017 |
|
3.⇩ |
Frederick and John Street Intersection Upgrade - Have your say |
|
4.⇩ |
Frederick Street Ashfield Safety Upgrade - Consultation Report |
|
5.⇩ |
Minutes of November Traffic Committee Meeting LTC1122(1) Item 10 Update on improvements to the Frederick Street, Ashfield crossing |
|
6.⇩ |
Upgrade of Parramatta Road and Great North Road Intersection |
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Parramatta to CBD Foreshore Link 91km path
From: Councillors John Stamolis and Kobi Shetty
|
MOTION
That Council:
1. Express support for a continuous 91km active transport path linking Parramatta to the CBD along the foreshore;
2. Supply any existing reports or maps produced by Council (e.g. Leichhardt Council) which may assist in enhancing the path or links to the path from within our municipality; and
3. Advocate for the Glebe Island Bridge to be included as part of the path concept.
|
Background
The provision of active transport paths along the foreshores around Sydney demonstrates visionary thinking in a city like ours which has expansive waterways. These paths assist with transport, physical health and mental health. Often, these works are accompanied by projects which create more green space, more tree planting and protection of our waterways.
The following article appeared in the National Tribune.
PARRAMATTA TO CBD FORESHORE LINK ON TRACK, January 29, 2023
A continuous 91km active transport path linking Parramatta to the CBD along the foreshore is forging ahead, with detailed planning and early works now underway.
Minister for Active Transport Rob Stokes said an interactive map detailing a draft route had been released for public feedback.
“Anyone who has walked, jogged or cycled around Sydney Harbour or the Parramatta River will tell you how glorious it can be, with 72 per cent of it already publicly accessible, but now it’s time to connect the entire route,” Mr Stokes said.
“We want to make it easier for families to enjoy a free, fun and healthy day out, which is why we’re asking the community to tell us which missing links they want to see connected across 18 suburbs stretching between Parramatta and the CBD.”
“The map also identifies 12 different projects that are in planning or already underway, including a new shared path at Wentworth Point Bridge, an upgrade of the existing Bay Run Path, the construction of a shared path parallel to the Parramatta Light Rail Stage 1 and more.”
A program of early works is currently being finalised with City of Parramatta, City of Canada Bay, Inner West Council and Greater Sydney Parklands.
Work is already underway to complete the missing link along the Bay Run at Rozelle and work will begin on three additional missing link projects in Parramatta and Canada Bay later this year including:
· A new shared path along the foreshore between Queens Wharf Reserve and the new Alfred Street Bridge, Parramatta.
· A new shared park through Henry Lawson Park, Abbotsford.
· An upgrade to widen an existing foreshore shared path at Massey Park Golf Club, Concord.
Member for Parramatta Geoff Lee said the Liberals and Nationals Government had transformed active transport infrastructure in and around Parramatta.
“More than $50 million has been invested into active transport links on and around the Parramatta River, making it one of the best places to ride in NSW,” Mr Lee said.
“The Liberals and Nationals Government has committed $60 million to make this path a reality, connecting Parramatta to the Sydney Opera House and beyond along one our beautiful foreshore.”
Liberal candidate for Parramatta Katie Mullens said active transport infrastructure would encourage more people to walk and ride.
“Bike riding is booming in popularity and this was heightened during the pandemic where we saw a 200 per cent increase in riders along the M4 bike path at Parramatta,” Ms Mullens said.
“By building better connections, we’re encouraging people of all ages to live healthier lifestyles and leave the car at home.”
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Protecting the Right to Peaceful Non-Violent Protest in NSW
From: Councillors Kobi Shetty and Dylan Griffiths
|
MOTION
That Council:
1. Acknowledge that the right to protest is fundamental in a democratic society;
2. Condemn harsh police practices with respect to protesters and commit to support and facilitate the right of the community, including climate activists, to peacefully protest in the Inner West Local Government Area; and
3. The Mayor urgently write to the NSW Attorney General, NSW Shadow Attorney General, the NSW Minister for Police and the Commissioner for Police to:
a) express support for the right of peaceful
gathering, meeting, and assembly in NSW; b) express the Inner West Council’s
support for the repeal of protest laws introduced in April 2022; and c) call on the NSW Police to cease pre-emptive and heavy-handed policing of protests, particularly climate protests.
|
Background
The NSW Government has enacted a series of laws which restrict and criminalise peaceful protests. Most recently, in April 2022, following protests by climate activists in the city, the NSW Parliament passed legislation to prevent protesting on major roads, bridges, tunnels, public transport and infrastructure facilities. The new legislation amends the section 144G the Roads Act 1993 and criminalises activities that ‘cause serious disruption.’ These offences carry a maximum penalty of $22,000 or two years in gaol, or both.
Since the passing of the amendment in April 2022, many activists have been charged under these and other anti-protest laws. These laws were strongly opposed by human rights, environmental and civil liberties groups, and in October 2022, The Environmental Defenders Office filed a legal challenge to the laws in the NSW Supreme Court.
The NSW Police has formed a militarised police unit Strike Force Guard which has targeted environmental campaigners. The NSW Council for Civil Liberties and human rights groups have urgently written to the NSW Government (including the Attorney General, Police Minister and Commissioner for Police) expressing concern about pre-emptive and intimidatory police tactics leading up to the International Mining and Resources Conference (IMARC) held in Sydney over 2 to 4 November 2022 and reported police activities include police making unannounced visits to suspected activists’ homes, car stops and searches, and arrests of climate activists and networks prior to the event.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: School-based market leases
From: Deputy Mayor Philippa Scott
|
MOTION
That Council write to Minister for Education:
1. Seeking assurance that the contracts and leases for the school-based markets in the Inner West Council Local Government Area at Orange Grove Public School and Rozelle Public School are not at risk; and
2. Seeking a timeline for their tender and confirmation that market tenders are being proactively managed.
|
Background
Inner West residents have heard the devastating news that the market operator for Glebe Markets at Glebe Public School has pulled out of their contract with just three weeks’ notice. This was perfectly within the right of the operator, and the short notice period is due to the fact that the Department of Education has failed the school and the community by dropping the ball on the tender and contract management process.
Markets that experience a “gap in service” may never fully recover. Stallholders rely on income on a week-to-week basis and will set up elsewhere if the market closes down, even briefly.
Rozelle Public School was forced into a mismanaged tender process that closed the markets for a significant period of time, and has now halved the number of markets held at that school, which has resulted in reduced income to the P&C.
Markets are often an anchor tenant for a high street and at a time when Sydney’s high streets need revitalisation, their loss will be devastating for weekend trading by local small businesses.
Inner West Council seeks assurance that the markets in the Inner West Council LGA are being proactively managed and that these markets are not at risk as Glebe Markets are.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Callan Park community use
From: Deputy Mayor Philippa Scott
|
MOTION
That Council:
1. Note that the Leichhardt Women’s’ Community Health Centre (LWCHC) have compassionately and diligently served the community for many decades and despite being burdened with an outdated funding model, have through their own skill and efficiency, expanded their service and have now outgrown their premises on Thornley Street Leichhardt;
2. Note that LWCHC have over the summer period asked Council for assistance to support their efforts to find additional premises;
3. Note that LWCHC were encouraged to participate in an application process for use of space at Callan Park, and have not heard from the State Member for Balmain Jamie Parker or the Planning Minister Rob Stokes with regard to the status of their application; and
4. Write to the State Member for Balmain and the Minister for Planning asking for an update on the Callan Park community health precinct application process that local not for profit groups in good faith participated in, and request that they be provided with a response.
|
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Rozelle Parklands Transport and Traffic Assessment
From: The Mayor, Councillor Darcy Byrne and Deputy Mayor, Councillor Philippa Scott
|
MOTION
That Council:
1. Commission a traffic and parking assessment of the Rozelle Parklands project to identify the treatments that are needed to ensure safety and accessibility for park users and neighbouring residents;
2. Write to the NSW Government demanding that they finally take up their responsibility by funding the costs of the traffic and parking assessment;
3. Notify residents on the streets adjoining the Interchange site in Rozelle, Lilyfield and Annandale of Council’s decision to commission the study and encourage residents to write to the Government and Member for Balmain insisting that the study be funded by the NSW Government; and
4. Any costs incurred by Council are to be reported through the quarterly budget review process.
|
Background
The NSW Government is still refusing to conduct a traffic and parking assessment in the planning of the Rozelle Parklands project.
Given the huge, long-term impacts that local residents in Rozelle, Lilyfield and Annandale are still being subjected to from construction of the Westconnex Interchange, it is inept and negligent of the Government to refuse to properly plan for and manage the traffic that will be generated by the new park.
Transport for NSW’s own community reference group report previously recommended that a traffic and parking analysis must be undertaken prior to the finalisation of any plans for the park.
With works due to commence in 2023 it is urgent that a traffic and parking assessment be undertaken now.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: St Peter’s Station Accessibility
From: Councillors Liz Atkins and Justine Langford
|
MOTION
That Council:
1. Note the recent work at St Peter’s station and the very welcome installation of lifts between platforms and concourse;
2. Note the replacement of the Goodsell Street entrance ramp with steps; and
3. Write to the NSW Minister for Transport thanking the government for installing lifts at St Peters Station and seeking direct step-free access to those lifts from Goodsell Street.
|
Background
Work has recently been completed to upgrade St Peter’s Station, including installation of lifts between the platforms and concourse, increasing accessibility. Transport for NSW described the upgrade as providing a station precinct that is accessible to people with a disability, limited mobility, parents/carers with prams and customers with luggage.
However, Transport for NSW has also replaced ramp entrance from Goodsell St with a short flight of stairs making access to the lifts and platform more difficult for many people including the elderly and others who struggle with stairs, commuters with a disability, people travelling with young children, those with heavy shopping or a shopping trolley and cyclists.
While it is possible to avoid the stairs by walking up Goodsell Street to the Princes Highway and along the highway to the lane back to the station entrance, this imposes an additional 180-200m for those whose mobility problems mean they cannot manage the stairs. This is unacceptable.
Residents have complained about this to Transport for NSW and have started a petition.
Officer’s Comments:
Comment from Director Infrastructure:
The issue with the provision on new stairs between the station and Goodsell Street was an item that staff recognised when Transport for NSW consulted with Council during design development of their train station upgrade. In this regard, staff asked why the existing at grade surface was not being retained. It appears that staff feedback was not considered when finalising the Train Station design/construction.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Question on Notice: Rental Income
From: Councillor John Stamolis
It would be appreciated if the following questions could be answered:
Question
Council to check (and, where necessary correct) the rental income data shown below.
Answer
As requested, please find the updated chart below in the last question.
Question
Councils rental income increased by $1.078m to $7.077m in YE20. What drove this increase?
Answer
Leases for the following locations with a year-on-year change–
· Yeo Park Café $59k – new lease negotiated in FY20
· Marrickville Library Café $48k – new lease negotiated in FY20
· The Fenwick Building restaurant $104k – new lease negotiated in FY20
· Debbie & Abbey Borgia Community Centre – PYCY $110k (includes a prior year adjustment of $68k)
· Ashfield Early Learning Centre – new lease negotiated in FY20
· Motor vehicle Leaseback (Council staff vehicles) income $581k not previously captured in this natural account.
Question
Councils rental income fell by $2.558m to $4.519m in YE21. What has caused this fall?
Answer
The amount in question does not include leaseback income of $0.54m and there was a $36k error in the table below. This changes the amount in this question to a reduced income of $1.98m.
Rental income dropped in 2020/21 financial year mainly due to loss of Tyne Container Storage income ($1.8m) following the sale of this land to Transport for NSW.
COVID-19 AKAC received a rent deduction of $163k from March 2021 to 30 June 2021.
Question
Over the two years YE23 and YE24, Councils rental income increases by $3.307m, what is driving this increase?
Answer
This increase is for the planned acquisition of new investment properties, including the new investment property at 203 Northumberland Street, Liverpool, replacing previous Tyne Container income. Rental on a full year basis is budgeted at $4.1m. An increase of $2.1m from 2022/23 for January to June 2023.
A CPI increase was included in the budget of 2%.
Question
Over the two years YE25 and YE26, Councils rental income falls by $866K, what is causing this fall?
Answer
The existing lease with Transport for NSW comes to an end in 2025/26. This lease is for a small parcel of land next to the old Tyne Containers.
Question
Why are the increases projected for the 5 years YE27 to YE32 so low?
Answer
The budget includes a 2% inflation factor on a year-on-year basis for rental income.
Question
What $-impact will there be in regard to the increase in rental income from the purchase of the two new commercial properties by Council?
Answer
The LTFP includes $2m in 2022/23 for the second half of the financial year, and $4m income for the 2023/24 full financial year and onwards.
Question
Does the data below incorporate or assume any sale of Council properties?
Answer
· The data does not include any sale proceeds of Council properties.
· Updated data within the table below.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Question on Notice: Staff changes
From: Councillor John Stamolis
Comment by the General Manager:
Answers to the question will be provided at an Ordinary Council meeting in March 2023.
Question
It would be appreciated if Council could provide staff recruitment and staff termination data for 2017, 2021 and 2022.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Question on Notice: Employee Termination Costs
From: Councillor John Stamolis
Comment by the General Manager:
Answers to all questions will be provided at an Ordinary Council meeting in March 2023.
Since the merger, over the 5 years from 2016 to 2021, Councils employee termination costs have been above $2 million (and as high as $5.64 million).
t
Question
Council to advise on the factors driving the cost of termination for each year.
Question
Council to report on the high cost of termination over financial year 2019-20.
Question
Council to advise on the low amount of employee termination costs over the most recent year 2021-22.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Update on the acquisition of investment properties
Prepared By: Scott Mullen - Strategic Investments and Property Manager
Authorised By: Kelly Loveridge - Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopt the recommendation contained in the Confidential Attachment 1. |
DISCUSSION
Council will move into closed session to deal with the Update on Acquisition of Investment Properties, for information which is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(d)(c) and (Section 10A(2)(d)(ii) of the Local Government Act 1993. The matter is deemed confidential, as the matter is commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business and if disclosed confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the council.
Pursuant to section 10A(2), 10(2) and 10A(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public will be excluded from the meeting on the basis that the business to be considered is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(d)(c) and (Section 10A(2)(d)(ii) of the Local Government Act 1993.
|
Update on the acquistion of investment properties - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(ii) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the council. |
|
|
EY Report on Initial DD Report V12 - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(ii) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the council. |
|
|
Shortlisted Property - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(ii) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the council. |
|
|
4. |
Additional Information - DRAFT Summary Valuation Report - Shortlisted Property – Confidential
This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
5. |
Additional Information - Memorandum Approval by General Manager Non Binding Offer to Purchase Shortlisted Property – Confidential
This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
6. |
Additional Information - Letter of Offer - Purchase of Shortlisted Property – Confidential
This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Lease of 10 Norton Street, Ashfield
Prepared By: Scott Mullen - Strategic Investments and Property Manager
Authorised By: Kelly Loveridge - Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopted the recommendation contained in Confidential Attachment 1.
|
DISCUSSION
Council will move into closed session to deal with the Lease of 10 Norton Street, Ashfield, which is classified as confidential under section (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993. This matter is deemed confidential, as the matter is commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
Pursuant to section 10A(2), 10(2) and 10A(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public will be excluded from the meeting on the basis that the business to be considered is classified as confidential under Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993.
|
Confidential Report - Lease of 10 Norton Street, Ashfield - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business. |
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Appointment of Independent ARIC member
Prepared By: Beau-Jane De Costa - Senior Manager Governance and Risk
Authorised By: Kelly Loveridge - Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1.
|
DISCUSSION
At its Ordinary Council meeting on Tuesday 9 August 2022, Council resolved to adopt the minutes of the Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee (ARIC) Meeting held on 23 February 2022, which outlined the adoption of the amended Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee Terms of Reference (TOR).
In accordance with the newly adopted TOR, Council has undertaken the recruitment process for appointing a new member on the ARIC.
Council will move into closed session to deal with the Appointment of Independent ARIC Member, which is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(a) of the Local Government Act 1993. The matter is deemed confidential, as it contains personnel matters concerning particular individuals (other than councillors).
Pursuant to section 10A(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public will be excluded from the meeting on the basis that the business to be considered is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(a) of the Local Government Act 1993.
|
Confidential report - Appointment of Independent ARIC member - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to personnel matters concerning particular individuals (other than councillors) (Section 10A(2)(a) of the Local Government Act 1993). |
|
|
Independent Member CV - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to personnel matters concerning particular individuals (other than councillors) (Section 10A(2)(a) of the Local Government Act 1993). |
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: Summer Hill Reuse Centre - Update
Extraordinary Council Meeting at its meeting on 13 December 2022 resolved that the matter be deferred to the meeting to be held on 14 February 2023.
Prepared By: Scott Mullen - Strategic Investments and Property Manager
Authorised By: Kelly Loveridge - Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Approves further discussions with other interested parties who did not provide a submission to the EOI, and have subsequently contacted Council, to occupy any remaining space for the purpose of reuse and recycling; and
2. Investigates opportunities to locate a Reverse Vending Machine on the site.
|
DISCUSSION
At its Council meeting on 8 September 2020 Council resolved:
Progress with the development of a Reuse and Recycling Hub as a medium-term use at Summer Hill Depot and continue discussions with suitable not-for-profit organisations.
The site is also intended to accommodate Council’s Green Living Centre, programs from Urban Ecology and continue as a council depot for civil works storage.
This report provides an update on the progress for the Summer Hill Depot reuse and recycling hub (the Hub).
The project is a collaboration between Council’s Resource Recovery Policy, Resource Recovery Operations, Property and Capital Works Teams (with assistance from other staff as required).
The Development Application
As part of the development application process Council engaged an independent planning consultant on behalf of the proposed tenants to obtain development consent for the operation of a reuse, recycling, and education centre at Summer Hill Depot.
Development approval was granted on 23 November 2021 and included building upgrades to ensure compliance with WHS and accessibility and removal of contaminated building material such as asbestos to ensure the site is safe and BCA compliant.
The Bower or other proposed tenants are required to obtain their own services to prepare the plans necessary for the Development Application for any proposed fit out works.
A contract was subsequently awarded and building works commenced in August 2022 with completion expected by mid-December 2022, allowing the Green Living Centre and The Bower (if no further fit out works are intended) to commence occupation at the site.
Modified Development Application
A modified Development Application is being considered to allow Council’s Service vehicles to access Liverpool Road (via Nottle Street). This would remove the need for larger vehicles to turn within the site, assisting with traffic flow and reducing traffic congestion at the top of the site.
THE BOWER
The Bower are a not-for-profit environmental charity committed to reducing landfill and champion of reuse and repair within our community.
It has a shop front and collects and repairs household items from the community for sale and distribution through its house to home program (furnishings for disadvantaged community members setting up a home).
Their range of services and programs are all based on the ethos of
reuse and repair, and they have agreements with over 21 Sydney
metropolitan councils to collect unwanted household goods and
rehome them.
Following the withdrawal of Reverse Garbage from the project, Council staff continued discussions with The Bower and have signed a Heads of Agreement for a new 5-year lease (with a 5-year option), with execution of the lease pending finalisation of the area to be leased and rent.
On 16 August 2022, The Bower advised Council that COVID19 had significantly impacted their Business Plan. They have confirmed that:
· Building 1 is no longer required for the ‘shopfront’ or any other use.
· Building 2 will be used for reuse and repair workshops, a similar arrangement as that in place at Redfern and Parramatta, including some office space and higher end sales and includes:
§ Repair cafes - to repair and upcycling items that may otherwise end up in landfill
§ Workshops include Bicycle repairs, Woodworking (make a crate, a beehive box, a stool), DIY repairs, Furniture repairs, Furniture restoration, Clothing repairs, Upholstery, and Bespoke workshops, team building and corporate workshops.
§ House to Home Program - Upcycled and refurbished goods to fit out social housing or accommodation through charities for people who have been homeless, refugees, and or escaped domestic violence. They work with 13 agencies in Sydney including Mission Australia, Uniting, Bonnie’s support services, Mary's House, and Newtown Asylum Centre
§ Building 3 will be used by The Bower for their tiny house workshops (Running approximately 3 sessions per year, each over a period of 2-3 weeks)
§ They have requested a 75% accommodation grant across the 5-year lease.
Public Benefit – The Bower
A table has been prepared that summarises The Bowers proposal (Attachment 2) and includes a 12-month calendar of activities with proposed community benefits realised through its operation.
THE VILLAGE PROJECT
One (1) submission was received from The Village Project in response to the Expression of Interest (EOI 12-21) seeking additional interested organisations to co-locate with The Bower at the Hub.
The criteria for the EOI were aligned to the Inner West Zero Waste Strategy, a circular economy approach which includes targets for waste avoidance, reuse, recycling, and repair.
The Village Project is a local cooperative and a not-for-profit which brings together people and recyclers in one space to maximise reuse and recycling of resources such as textiles and plastics. They connect unwanted materials with users of those materials in a circular economy.
They submitted a compliant bid that involves collaborating with reuse organisations and recyclers targeting materials including textiles, plastic, polystyrene, cups, bicycles, scooters, and e-waste. They identified waste and materials that are usually presented within residential bins or clean-up including textiles, glass, and plastics, as well as common contaminants in the residential waste and recycling stream such as batteries and e-waste.
They propose to use the site as a hub to collect materials recycled by their reuse partners. Their team at Summer Hill Reuse Centre would sort the items, store them temporarily and arrange collection by their partners. Textile, glass, ceramics, and plastic is proposed to be the primary focus with permanent collection points for residential drop off during Centre opening hours.
They also proposed monthly collection drives for specific materials or items on a given day (e.g., a drop off day for bikes or e-waste). Their recycling and reuse partners then collect the targeted materials and remove them from the site for remanufacture into new products (e.g. tiles, furniture, sunglasses etc.) Remanufactured products would then be returned and displayed and sold at the Summer Hill Reuse Centre as well as online.
The drop off service would be free for local residents to access, and The Village Project may consider also offering paid collections for commercial businesses at a later date. They have 30 volunteers already engaged and collaborating with reuse partners who have the capacity to recycle, or reuse identified materials. It is understood that The Village Project intend to have a staff member present 2 days per week initially with a view to increase hours and active days on the site as they become established.
The Village Project have made an application for a 100% accommodation grant, and if approved would be required to pay only outgoings for their portion of the site (utilities). In accordance with the Land and Property Policy and as part of the terms and conditions of the lease, they would be required to enter into a Service Level Agreement (SLA) to provide detailed reporting on materials collected, reused, and recycled, including the number of residents engaged, drop offs and tonnages/kg of materials collected from IWC residents.
Public Benefit – The Village Project
A table has been prepared that summarises the various organisations that form the collective proposal (Attachment 1) and includes narrative on the proposed community benefits realised through its operation.
Operating Times for the Summer Hill Reuse Centre
DA approval was granted for operating hours of 8am to 8pm, seven (7) days a week.
The Summer Hill Reuse Centre is planned to operate and be open to the public as per the table below:
|
Entity |
Description |
Days |
Hours |
|
The Bower |
An environmental charity focused on reuse and repair within our community. It has a shop front and collects and repairs household items from our community for sale and distribution through its house to home program (furnishings for disadvantaged community members setting up a home). |
Monday to Friday with weekends as per Attachment 2 Calendar |
8.30am to 5pm |
|
The Village Project |
A local cooperative which brings together people and recyclers in one space to maximise reuse and recycling of resources such as textiles and plastics. They connect unwanted materials with users of those materials in a circular economy. |
2 days initially, increasing to 5 once established |
TBC as required within site DA approval (8am to 8pm) |
|
The Green Living Centre |
An Inner West Council initiative that provides community workshops on waste, re-use, circular economy, climate, and other sustainability topics. |
TBC 2+ days a week |
TBC as required within site DA approval (8am to 8pm) |
|
Urban Ecology |
An Inner West Council service selling plants sourced from locally collected seeds, and re-use related initiatives such as free mulch for residents Rainwater tank community education e.g. rainwater tank workshops. |
TBC |
TBC as required within site DA approval (8am to 8pm) |
|
Civil Works Depot |
Maintain operation as a civil works depot and provide storage for use within the Ashfield precinct |
7 days |
6am - 6pm (as required) |
Environmental Upgrades
Solar Power
Summer Hill Reuse Centre is currently equipped with a 15.6 kW solar PV system on the roof which will be expanded, and a battery will be installed to store excess solar power for evening use following the current capital works. The existing system will be expanded by 20kW, based on concept design and the battery will be sized during the detailed design, but is expected to be residential scale. This work will be completed and funded through a separate budget managed by Council’s Environment and Sustainability Unit.
EV Charging Stations
Additional electrical wiring, including subsurface conduits were incorporated into the existing works project so that the site would be EV ready. It is planned to subsequently install four charging bays, each equipped with a Level 2 charger (AC fast chargers), pending final review of the overall electricity load requirements of all site tenants.
It is intended that these will provide a substantial EV top-up whilst the community visits the Reuse centre. This work will be completed and funded through a separate budget managed by Council’s Environment and Sustainability Unit.
Other Site Opportunities
As the site requirements for each of the user groups is finalised, staff are reviewing the remaining available building and land space at the depot, to see if there are any further opportunities that would align with the proposed use, so as to fully activate the site.
This may include community groups who require operational spaces, and also other opportunities such as Reverse Vending Machines through the Return and Earn container deposit scheme initiated by the State Government.
It is recommended that staff also progress further discussions with other interested parties who did not provide a submission to the EOI, and have subsequently contacted Council, to occupy any remaining space for the purpose of reuse and recycling.
Leichhardt Men’s Shed
This is a community group with a need to relocate from their current facilities in Blackmore Oval, and whose space and power requirements align with that of the depot site. The Men’s Shed have recently viewed the available space and are considering this opportunity.
Return and Earn
It is further recommended that staff investigate opportunities of locating a Reverse Vending Machine on the site. These container deposit schemes work by adding a small deposit on top of the price of everyday beverages This deposit is then refunded to the consumer when they return their empty drink container for recycling.
These schemes have been shown to reduce container litter and increase recycling rates, through:
1. Litter reduction: Traditionally waste has no value to the individual, and while there are many places to dispose of waste, it still relies on an individual to do the right thing. Many do, but many don’t so by adding a small reward, it incentivises and motivates people to dispose of their waste responsibly.
2. More effective recycling: By capturing and sorting purely eligible drink containers, this generates a much cleaner material stream that can then be recycled again and again in a clean loop system, rather than much of it going to landfill due to material contamination
Garden space between Buildings 3 and 4
An RFQ for design and construction of an outdoor demonstration space between Buildings 3 and 4 is currently being finalised. The design includes reuse material within the construction and space for 20 participants to undertake recycling-themed workshops, and makes provision for high accessibility and can be used by all tenants of the site.
Summer Hill Reuse Centre – (pending finalisation)
1. Building 1 – TBA
2. Buildings 2 & 3 – The Bower
3. Building 4 – The Green Living Centre (GLC): is an Inner West Council initiative that provides community workshops on waste, re-use, circular economy, climate, and other sustainability topics. It will also be made available for reuse Centre tenants to book and use for workshops and community waste and sustainability education.
4. Building 5 – GLC Offices and one (1) for The Village Project
5. Building 6 – Urban Ecology is an Inner West Council service and will utilise the space for plants sourced from locally collected seeds, and re-use related initiatives such as free mulch for residents (from parks tree pruning within the Inner West)
6. Building 7 (Bays) – EV Car Charging: Available to site visitors shop or attend workshops.
7. Building 8 – The Village Project
8. Building 9 – Civil Works Depot storage of materials / equipment.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Project Budget for capital works
Council previously resolved to fund the costs of obtaining necessary approvals (including engagement of consultants) to change the use of the site to a recycling hub. Tenants are required to provide any further capital expenditure required for any fitout works.
The approved budget for the project is $1.4M, consisting of $1.3M sourced from the Domestic waste reserve with an additional $100k from Infrastructure, Capital Works.
The contract value for the current works is $1,200,500 (ex GST).
Consultant costs to prepare the Development Application to date are $186,500 (ex GST)
The total planned cost for the works to date is $1,387,000 (ex GST) and excludes solar panels and EV charging stations.
Requests for Accommodation Grants
Refer to Attachment 3 - Confidential Summer Hill Reuse Centre Financial Implications and Council Contribution.
Council may move into closed session to deal with the Summer Hill Reuse Centre - Update, for information which is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(d)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993. The matter is deemed confidential, as the matter is commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
Pursuant to section 10A(2), 10(2) and 10A(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public will be excluded from the meeting on the basis that the business to be considered is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(d)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION AS AT FEBRUARY 2023
Noting that this report was originally tabled for the 6 December 2022 meeting of council, investigations and planning have progressed on finalising the activation of all components of the Summer Hill resuse centre. A summary is provided below.
The Bower and The Village Project
Council staff have met with The Bower to discuss their proposed lease and their plans to commence move in at the site.
At the time of publication of the council business papers, a meeting had also been planned to be held between the Bower and the Village project to update them on the status of the construction works, issuing of the occupation certificate and to discuss with both groups any supplementary activities and ideas the parties may consider to further activate the site.
Council works and services
Occupation Certificate
The application for Occupation Certificate is anticipated to be submitted by mid-February, following a contractor delay in the procurement of the Fire Services enclosure.
The Green Living Centre
Council’s Green Living Centre has prepared a preliminary plan to commence face-to-face community engagement programs and educational courses from the Summer Hill centre from the second week of March (subject to the issue of an Occupation Certificate).
The initial program includes courses and activities which will align with International Women’s Day and will focus on active transport and waste avoidance. A second round of activities scheduled for later March will focus on sustainable buildings and helping our residents to understand (and reduce) their power bills.
Outdoor workshop space
A work schedule to commence on the creation of a new shared outdoor workshop space in the garden area between Buildings 3 and 4 is currently being finalised. This area would provide open-air space for face-to-face demonstrations of recycling, eco-living and other sustainability engagement programs (such as rainwater tank and raingarden programs). Works include new accessible pathways, planter beds, seating and shading.
Other Site Opportunities
Leichhardt Men’s Shed
The Men’s Shed toured the site in December 2022 and have subsequently written to Council and declined the opportunity.
The Bower have identified as part of their proposed programme to investigate the establishment of both a women’s and men’s shed.
Return and Earn
Consideration has been given to a complementary reuse operation within the site such as Return and Earn. Investigations are continuing to ensure any potential amenity impacts such as noise would be addressed prior to locating any such container.
Dress for Success
Dress for Success Sydney (DfSS) has expressed interest in relocating its current service from Marrickville to the remaining vacant space (Building 1) following a recent site visit.
DfSS is a volunteer powered organisation that supports women in need. Their primary objective is to increase the employability of women in need by building their knowledge, skills, confidence, and resilience; providing them with tools to secure employment and thrive at work.
DFSS source second hand clothing and samples for reuse to provide a free service to vulnerable women across NSW, empowering women into employment, with services including:
· Styling service with a personalised 1:1 session with a volunteer stylist to provide clothing, styling, and presentation skills to enter or return to the workforce as well as to present well at important life events.
· Running a series of shop front sales across the year where donated clothing that is not client appropriate is sold to members of the public. These pop-up sales support the sustainability of their capacity building programs and services; foster equity and social connection; and champion the circular fashion economy for all community members.
· Career Support Program job search and personal development workshops, to help women develop the skills and confidence to maximise their chances of job search success.
Next steps
It is intended to proceed with finalising rental agreements with both The Bower and The Village to commence utilisation and activation at the site.
In parallel council staff will continue preparing for the establishment of the Green Living Centre’s program of sustainability engagement programs, and the outdoor shared space.
Subject to council resolution, staff will continue to liaise with DFSS on the occupation of the remaining vacant space at the depot site.
|
1.⇩ |
The Village Project - Proposed Use and Benefits |
|
2.⇩ |
The Bower - Proposed Use and Benefits |
|
Confidential Summer Hill ReUse Centre Financial Implications and Council Contribution - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business. |
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: RFT 27-22 External Legal Panel
Prepared By: Matthew Pearce - General Counsel
Authorised By: Peter Gainsford - General Manager
|
That Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1.
|
DISCUSSION
On 22 September 2022 Inner West Council invited tenders for an External Legal Provider Panel. Following an evaluation of the twenty (20) submissions, the Evaluation Panel selected eight (8) law firms that would provide to Council external legal services for a period of four (4) years. Generally, Council’s legal work is conducted by the Council’s in-house legal team but, at times, additional resources are required. The Panel will provide a range of expertise that reflect Council’s operations to be used when required.
A copy of the full tender evaluation report is attached as ATTACHMENT 1.
Council will move into closed session to deal with the RFT 27-22 External Legal Panel, for information which is classified as confidential under Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993, Section 10A(2)(d)(i) (of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
Pursuant to section 10A(2), 10(2) and 10A(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public will be excluded from the meeting on the basis that the business to be considered is classified as confidential under Section 10A(2)(c) and Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Nil.
|
Tender Evaluation Report RFT 27-22 External Legal Panel - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
|
Appendix 1 - Legal Evaluation Scoresheet - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
|
Council Meeting 14 February 2023 |
Subject: RFT 20-22 HJ Mahoney Reserve Amenities Works
Prepared By: Stuart Hull - Senior Manager Capital Works
Authorised By: Ryann Midei - Director Infrastructure
|
That Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1. |
DISCUSSION
Council will move into closed session to deal with the RFT 20-22 HJ Mahoney Reserve Amenities Works, for information which is classified as confidential under Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 and section 10A(2)(d)(i) (of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it and if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
Pursuant to section 10A(2), 10(2) and 10A(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public will be excluded from the meeting on the basis that the business to be considered is classified as confidential under Section 10A(2)(c) and section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993.
|
Confidential Report - RFT 20-22 HJ Mahoney Reserve Amenities Works - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
|
Tender Evaluation Report RFT 20-22 HJ Mahoney Reserve Amenities Works - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
