AGENDA R

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Local Traffic Committee Meeting

                          

MONDAY 16 SEPTEMBER 2024

 

11:00 AM

 


Local Traffic Committee Meeting

16 September 2024

 

Function of the Local Traffic Committee

Background

Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) is legislated as the Authority responsible for the control of traffic on all NSW Roads. The RMS has delegated certain aspects of the control of traffic on local roads to councils. To exercise this delegation, councils must establish a local traffic committee and obtain the advice of the RMS and Police. The Inner West Council Local Traffic Committee has been constituted by Council as a result of the delegation granted by the RMS pursuant to Section 50 of the Transport Administration Act 1988.

 

Role of the Committee

The Local Traffic Committee is primarily a technical review and advisory committee which considers the technical merits of proposals and ensures that current technical guidelines are considered. It provides recommendations to Council on traffic and parking control matters and on the provision of traffic control facilities and prescribed traffic control devices for which Council has delegated authority. These matters are dealt with under Part A of the agenda and require Council to consider exercising its delegation.

In addition to its formal role as the Local Traffic Committee, the Committee may also be requested to provide informal traffic engineering advice on traffic matters not requiring Council to exercise its delegated function at that point in time, for example, advice to Council’s Development Assessment Section on traffic generating developments. These matters are dealt with under Part C of the agenda and are for information or advice only and do not require Council to exercise its delegation.

 

Committee Delegations

The Local Traffic Committee has no decision-making powers. The Council must refer all traffic related matters to the Local Traffic Committee prior to exercising its delegated functions. Matters related to State Roads or functions that have not been delegated to Council must be referred directly to the RMS or relevant organisation.

The Committee provides recommendations to Council. Should Council wish to act contrary to the advice of the Committee or if that advice is not supported unanimously by the Committee members, then the Police or RMS have an opportunity to appeal to the Regional Traffic Committee.

 

Committee Membership & Voting

Formal voting membership comprises the following:

·         one representative of Council as nominated by Council;

·         one representative of the NSW Police from each Local Area Command (LAC) within the LGA, being Newtown, Marrickville, Leichhardt and Ashfield LAC’s.

·         one representative from the RMS;  and

·         State Members of Parliament (MP) for the electorates of Summer Hill, Newtown, Heffron, Canterbury, Strathfield and Balmain or their nominees.

 

Where the Council area is represented by more than one MP or covered by more than one Police LAC, representatives are only permitted to vote on matters which effect their electorate or LAC.

Informal (non-voting) advisors from within Council or external authorities may also attend Committee meetings to provide expert advice.

 

Committee Chair

Council’s representative will chair the meetings.

 

Public Participation

Members of the public or other stakeholders may address the Committee on agenda items to be considered by the Committee. The format and number of presentations is at the discretion of the Chairperson and is generally limited to 3 minutes per speaker. Committee debate on agenda items is not open to the public.

 

 

 

   


Local Traffic Committee Meeting

16 September 2024

 

 

AGENDA

 

 

1          Apologies

 

2          Disclosures of Interest

 

3          Confirmation of Minutes

Minutes of 19 August 2024 Local Traffic Committee                6

 

4          Matters Arising from Council’s Resolution of Minutes

 

5          Part A – Items Where Council May Exercise Its Delegated Functions

 

Traffic Matters

 

ITEM                                                                                 Page

 

LTC0924(1) Item 1  The Boulevarde, Lilyfield -  Proposed Streetscape improvements and Civil Works (Baludarri-Balmain Ward/Balmain Electorate/Leichhardt PAC)                  19

LTC0924(1) Item 2  Derbyshire Road, Leichhardt - Sydney Secondary College Leichhardt - Proposed Kerb Extension (Baludarri-Balmain Ward/Balmain Electorate/Leichhardt PAC)                  25

LTC0924(1) Item 3  IW@40 - Area 6 Enmore & Marrickville East; Area 7 Marrickville & Tempe - Proposed speed limit reduction from 50km/h to 40 km/h (Midjuburi-Marrickville & Damun-Stanmore Wards/ Heffron,Summer Hill & Newtown Electorates/Inner West PAC)               29

LTC0924(1) Item 4  Newtown South Local Area Traffic Management Plan (LATM) Final Report (Damun-Stanmore Ward/Newtown Electorate/Inner West PAC)                 45

LTC0924(1) Item 5  Marrickville Road at Despointes Street, Marrickville – Proposed new raised pedestrian crossing - Design Plan 10297 (Midjuburi-Marrickville Ward / Summer Hill Electorate / Inner West PAC)                                                   162

LTC0924(1) Item 6  Clissold Street, between Queen Street and Victoria Street, Ashfield- Proposed removal of existing at-grade crossing and provide a new raised pedestrian (zebra) crossing (Djarrawunang-Ashfield Ward/Summer Hill Electorate/Burwood PAC)                                                   166

LTC0924(1) Item 7  Flood Street, Leichhardt – Proposed Slow Point at Regent Street (Gulgadya-Leichhardt Ward/Balmain Electorate/ Leichhardt PAC)                                 173

LTC0924(1) Item 8  Alt Street, south of Albert Parade, Ashfield-Proposed raising of existing pedestrian (zebra) crossing adjacent to St. Vincent's College (Gulgadya-Leichhardt Ward/Summer Hill Electorate/Burwood PAC)                  177

LTC0924(1) Item 9  Ryan Street, Lilyfield (at Joseph Street) – Proposed Landscaped Kerb Blister Island (Baludarri-Balmain Ward/Balmain Electorate/Leichhardt PAC)                183

 

 

 

 

Parking Matters

 

Nil at the time of printing.

 

 

Late Items

 

Nil at time of printing.

 

6          Part B - Items for Information Only

 

Nil at the time of printing.

7          Part C - Items for General Advice

 

Nil at the time of printing.

 

8          General Business

 

9          Close of Meeting


Local Traffic Committee Meeting

16 September 2024

 

Minutes of Local Traffic Committee Meeting

 

Meeting held on 19 August 2024 commenced at 11:02AM

 

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY BY CHAIRPERSON

 

I acknowledge the Gadigal and Wangal people of the Eora nation on whose country we are meeting today, and their elders past and present.

 

COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT

 

Jason Scoufis

IWC’s Acting Traffic and Transport Planning Manager (Chair)

Bill Holliday

Representative for Kobi Shetty MP, Member for Balmain

Graeme McKay

Representative for Jo Haylen MP, Member for Summer Hill

Eleanor Nurse

Representative for Jenny Leong MP, Member for Newtown

Nina Fard

Transport for NSW (TfNSW)

 

 

NON VOTING MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE

 

 

Bob Moore

Representative for the Inner West Bicycle Coalition (IWBC)

Sunny Jo

IWC’s Coordinator Traffic Engineering Services (North)

George Tsaprounis

IWC’s Coordinator Traffic Engineering Services (South)

Daniel Li

IWC’s Graduate Traffic Engineer

Christy Li

IWC’s Business Administration Officer

 

 

VISITORS

 

 

 

Adrian Barritt

Representative for Transport for NSW/ Sydney Metro (Items 1 & 3)

 

 

APOLOGIES:    

 

 

 

Mayor Darcy Byrne

Councillor – Baludarri-Balmain Ward

Manod Wickramasinghe

IWC’s Traffic and Transport Planning Manager

 

 

DISCLOSURES OF INTERESTS:

 

Nil.

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

 

That the Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee held on Monday, 15 July 2024 be confirmed.

 

 

MATTERS ARISING FROM COUNCIL’S RESOLUTION OF MINUTES

 

Nil.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LTC0824(1) Item 1     Temporary Transport Plan (TTP) Riding Routes associated with the conversion of the T3 Bankstown Line - Inner West Council (Midjuburi - Marrickville Ward / Heffron Electorate, Summer Hill Electorate & Newtown Electorate/ Inner West PAC)

 

SUMMARY

 

As part of the Sydney Metro City & Southwest project, Transport for NSW (TfNSW) is introducing new temporary bike riding routes as part of its Temporary Transport Plan (TTP) to encourage people to travel by bike during the conversion of the T3 Bankstown Line.

 

Southwest Link bike riding routes will make it easier to connect with train or metro services at Sydenham, Tempe or Redfern stations. A key riding route is Dulwich Hill and Marrickville to Redfern.

 

To support the temporary riding route from Dulwich Hill and Marrickville to Redfern Station, Transport for NSW proposes permanent changes at the following locations:

 

  • Miller Lane at the intersection of Frazer Street, Marrickville.
  • Napier Street at the intersection of Morgan Street, Marrickville.
  • West Street at Railway Terrace, and
  • Station Street (at Marrickville Station) and Victoria Road as well Station Street.

 

It should be noted that wayfinding signage will be erected along the route to assist cyclist with travel information between locations.

 

It is recommended that the proposed works by TfNSW for Miller Lane, Napier Street, West Street and Station Street be supported by Council with the detailed plan for West Street be submitted by TfNSW and approved by Council’s Design Engineers and Traffic Officers prior to implementation.

 

Officers Recommendation:

 

1.   That the permanent traffic and signage changes outlined within this report be approved to support the introduction of temporary bike riding routes to encourage people to travel by bike during the conversion of the T3 Bankstown Line to a Metro Line; including:

·    construction of a wider gap for cyclists in the road closure area in Miller Lane at Fraser Street,

·    installation of a ‘Bicycle Excepted’ sign underneath existing ‘No Left Turn’ sign at the south end of the intersection of Napier and Morgan Streets,

·    widening of the existing concrete footpath on the western side of West Street (closure area) and installation of a gutter crossing grate, and

·    Installation of shared path signs in Station Street at the entry to the cycle link along the rail corridor between Station Street and Victoria Road

 

2.   That Transport for NSW/Sydney Metro implement the proposed changes.

 

3.   That Transport for NSW maintain all signs and linemarking associated with the proposed temporary riding routes for the duration of the conversion of the T3 Bankstown Line to a Metro Line.

 

DISCUSSION:

 

Public Speaker Adrian Barritt entered the meeting at 11.03am.

 

The Representative for the Member of Summer Hill queried when the T3 train line shut down will happen. Mr Barritt advised that the Sydney Metro is opening today and that once it has been established and is working reliably, the closure date of the T3 line between Sydenham and Bankstown will be announced.

 

The Representative for the Inner West Bicycle Coalition (IWBC) questioned why Route 2 – Dulwich Hill and Marrickville to Redfern, shows the proposed bicycle route to loop around Marrickville Park, instead of going ahead and turning left on Frazer Street. Mr Barritt advised that the road was not significantly wide enough to accommodate cyclists and that the bus stop on Livingstone Road which may introduce conflicts with the cycling route. It was advised that through working in collaboration with Council and Transport for NSW’s design team, it was determined that the cycle route going around Marrickville Park was the preferred route.

 

The Representative for the Member of Newtown noted that there were currently no lifts at Tempe station and questioned what additional facilities Transport for NSW/Sydney Metro were going to implement to assist bicycle parking if cyclists were not able to take their bicycles onto the train. Mr Barritt advised that they are in the final stages of getting approval to improve the bicycle parking at Tempe station. It was noted that Transport for NSW/Sydney Metro will be looking into investigating converting a carparking space to bike hoops as well as the potential of a parking bay for shared bikes.  

 

The Representative for the IWBC noted that one of the bicycle routes goes from Riverside Crescent to Wardell Road and questioned whether there could be a shared path on Wardell Road.  The Representative for the IWBC noted the potential for cyclists to use Ewart Lane as an alternate route and questioned whether the works undertaken on Ewart Lane had been completed. Mr Barritt advised he was unsure of the status of those works and would have to get back to the Committee with an update. The Representative for the IWBC raised concerns regarding the cycle route on Wardell Road between Riverside Crescent and Dudley Street noting cyclists would have to ride uphill on the road. The Representative for Transport for NSW (TfNSW) advised that there are currently proposals to reduce the speed limit on Wardell Road to 40km/h to help improve safety. Council Officers questioned what works were proposed to improve the connection at the West Street and the Railway Terrace, Petersham intersection. Mr Barritt advised that TfNSW are proposing to put a grate over the gutter to widen the distance of the shared path and make it easier for riders and pedestrians to pass.

 

The Representative for the Member of Newtown noted that the report notes that this item is within the Heffron electorate & Summer Hill electorate however Miller Lane and Napier Street were located in the Newtown electorate. Council Officers apologised for the error and advised they would amend the report.

 

The Representative for the IWBC questioned why a cycle route from Sydenham station and St Peters station was not included in the Temporary Transport Plan. The Representative for TfNSW advised they will provide a response to the Representative for the IWBC outside of the Committee meeting.

 

Public Speaker Adrian Barritt left the meeting at 11.33am.

 

Council Officers suggested amending the recommendation to include the investigation and consideration of a shared footpath between Riverside Crescent and Dulwich Hill station, the investigation for the potential of Ewart Lane to be used as a bicycle route, and request that TfNSW implement the 40km/h zone on Wardell Road.

 

The Committee members agreed with the amended recommendation.

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

 

That;

 

1.   The permanent traffic and signage changes outlined within this report be approved to support the introduction of temporary bike riding routes to encourage people to travel by bike during the conversion of the T3 Bankstown Line to a Metro Line; including:

·    construction of a wider gap for cyclists in the road closure area in Miller Lane at Fraser Street,

·    installation of a ‘Bicycle Excepted’ sign underneath existing ‘No Left Turn’ sign at the south end of the intersection of Napier and Morgan Streets,

·    widening of the existing concrete footpath on the western side of West Street (closure area) and installation of a gutter crossing grate, and

·    Installation of shared path signs in Station Street at the entry to the cycle link along the rail corridor between Station Street and Victoria Road

 

2.   Transport for NSW/Sydney Metro implement the proposed changes.

 

3.   Transport for NSW maintain all signs and linemarking associated with the proposed temporary riding routes for the duration of the conversion of the T3 Bankstown Line to a Metro Line.

 

4.  Consideration be given for a temporary shared footpath in Wardell Road between Riverside Crescent and Dulwich Hill station.

 

5.  Consideration be given for a temporary cycle path in Ewart Lane to be used as a bicycle route.

 

6.  Council request that TfNSW implement a temporary 40km/h zone on Wardell Road to support the proposed temporary cycle route.

 

For Motion: Unanimous

 

LTC0824(1) Item 2     Unwins Bridge Road, St Peters Traffic Safety Review (Midjuburi-Marrickville Ward/Heffron Electorate/Inner West PAC)

SUMMARY

 

At the Council Meeting held 25 June 2024 a Notice of Motion for consideration of a number of safety issues relating to Unwins Bridge Road was resolved. This report provides an assessment of each of these issues.

 

Officers Recommendation:

 

That the report be received and noted.

 

DISCUSSION:

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

 

That the report be received and noted.

 

For Motion: Unanimous

 

 

LTC0824(1) Item 3     Ewart Street, Dulwich Hill; Illawarra Road, Marrickville; Burrows Avenue, Railway Road, Gleeson Avenue and Lower Railway Parade, Sydenham – Temporary medium-term parking changes during major rail shutdown of T3 line for Sydney Metro Upgrade works – Bus replacements for an approximate 12-month period from October 2024 (Midjuburi-Marrickville Ward / Summer Hill Electorate / Inner West PAC)

SUMMARY

 

Council has been notified by Transport for NSW (TfNSW) that Sydney Metro works will involve a final major rail shutdown of the Sydenham to Bankstown rail line (T3) for approximately 12 months starting no later than October 2024. During the shutdown buses will replace train services along the T3 line and to accommodate the increased bus movements and necessary holding areas some short-term parking changes are required at a number of locations.

 

Specifically, TfNSW is requesting approval for the temporary conversion of multiple parking spaces at the following locations: Ewart Street, Dulwich Hill; Illawarra Road, Marrickville; Burrows Avenue, Railway Road, Gleeson Avenue and (Lower) Railway Parade, Sydenham. It is recommended that no objections be raised, and Council approves the temporary medium-term parking changes at the identified locations during the rail shutdowns. 

 

All changes to street signage will be made by TfNSW contractor(s) from 10pm the night before the closures and will be reinstated at the completion of the planned shutdown.

 

Officers Recommendation:

 

1.   That the following temporary medium-term parking changes for an approximate 12-month period from October 2024 be approved to support the rail upgrade works required to convert the T3 Bankstown Line to a Metro Line:

 

a)   Dulwich Hill Station Precinct - Ewart Street (3 parking spaces): The medium-term conversion of 20m (3 parking spaces) ‘2P 8am–6pm Mon–Fri’ on the northern side of Ewart Street (between Wardell Road and Bayley Street) to a ‘Bus Zone’;

 

b)   The medium-term conversion of 25m ‘No Parking’ restrictions on the southern side of Ewart Street (between Wardell Road and Riverside Crescent) to a ‘Bus Zone’;

 

c)  Marrickville Station Precinct - Illawarra Road (1 parking space): The medium-term conversion of 7m ‘1P 8:30am–6pm​’ on the western side of Illawarra Road (between Warburton Street and Greenbank Street) to a ‘Bus Zone’;

 

d)  Sydenham Station Precinct - Burrows Avenue (10 parking spaces): The medium-term conversion of 26m rear to kerb 90 degree angle ‘unrestricted parking’ on the northern kerb of Burrows Avenue (west of Gleeson Avenue) to a ‘Bus Zone’;

 

e)  The medium-term conversion of 58m (9 parking spaces) ‘unrestricted parking’ on the eastern kerb of Burrows Avenue (west of Gleeson Avenue) to a ‘Bus Zone’; 

 

f)  Sydenham Station Precinct – Railway Road (3 parking spaces): The medium-term conversion of 18m ‘2P 8:30am–10pm Mon-Fri’ on the eastern side kerb of Railway Road (between Burrows Avenue and Gleeson Avenue) to a ‘Bus Zone’;

 

  g)     Sydenham Station Precinct - Gleeson Avenue (2 parking spaces): The medium-term conversion of 12m ‘1P 9:00am–3:30pm Mon-Fri​ and ‘No Parking’ 6am-9am, 3:30pm–6:30pm’ on the eastern kerb of Gleeson Avenue between Burrows Avenue and Unwins Bridge Road to a ‘Bus Zone’; and

 

h)  Sydenham Station Precinct - Lower Railway Parade (29 parking spaces): The medium-term conversion of 29m (10 parking spaces) 45 degree angled ‘4P 8:30am–6pm Mon-Fri​’ and 53m (19 parking spaces) 45 degree angled unrestricted parking on the southwest kerb of Lower Railway Parade (between Gleeson Avenue and Marrickville Road) to a ‘Bus Zone’.

 

2.   That the cost of all works of the statement and/or reinstatement of any/all signage will be borne by TfNSW. 

 

3.    That the applicant and Council Rangers be advised in terms of this report.

 

DISCUSSION:

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

 

1.   That the following temporary medium-term parking changes for an approximate 12-month period from October 2024 be approved to support the rail upgrade works required to convert the T3 Bankstown Line to a Metro Line:

 

a)   Dulwich Hill Station Precinct - Ewart Street (3 parking spaces): The medium-term conversion of 20m (3 parking spaces) ‘2P 8am–6pm Mon–Fri’ on the northern side of Ewart Street (between Wardell Road and Bayley Street) to a ‘Bus Zone’;

 

b)   The medium-term conversion of 25m ‘No Parking’ restrictions on the southern side of Ewart Street (between Wardell Road and Riverside Crescent) to a ‘Bus Zone’;

 

c)  Marrickville Station Precinct - Illawarra Road (1 parking space): The medium-term conversion of 7m ‘1P 8:30am–6pm​’ on the western side of Illawarra Road (between Warburton Street and Greenbank Street) to a ‘Bus Zone’;

 

d)  Sydenham Station Precinct - Burrows Avenue (10 parking spaces): The medium-term conversion of 26m rear to kerb 90 degree angle ‘unrestricted parking’ on the northern kerb of Burrows Avenue (west of Gleeson Avenue) to a ‘Bus Zone’;

 

e)  The medium-term conversion of 58m (9 parking spaces) ‘unrestricted parking’ on the eastern kerb of Burrows Avenue (west of Gleeson Avenue) to a ‘Bus Zone’; 

 

f)  Sydenham Station Precinct – Railway Road (3 parking spaces): The medium-term conversion of 18m ‘2P 8:30am–10pm Mon-Fri’ on the eastern side kerb of Railway Road (between Burrows Avenue and Gleeson Avenue) to a ‘Bus Zone’;

 

  g)     Sydenham Station PrecinctGleeson Avenue (2 parking spaces): The medium-term conversion of 12m ‘1P 9:00am–3:30pm Mon-Fri​ and ‘No Parking’ 6am-9am, 3:30pm–6:30pm’ on the eastern kerb of Gleeson Avenue between Burrows Avenue and Unwins Bridge Road to a ‘Bus Zone’; and

 

h)  Sydenham Station Precinct - Lower Railway Parade (29 parking spaces): The medium-term conversion of 29m (10 parking spaces) 45 degree angled ‘4P 8:30am–6pm Mon-Fri​’ and 53m (19 parking spaces) 45 degree angled unrestricted parking on the southwest kerb of Lower Railway Parade (between Gleeson Avenue and Marrickville Road) to a ‘Bus Zone’.

 

2.   That the cost of all works of the statement and/or reinstatement of any/all signage will be borne by TfNSW. 

 

3.    That the applicant and Council Rangers be advised in terms of this report.

 

For Motion: Unanimous

 

LTC0824(1) Item 4     Woodland Street and Holmesdale Street, Marrickville – Temporary Road Closures for up to seven (7) separate weekend days to hold AFLW matches at Henson Park - (Midjuburi-Marrickville Ward /Summer Hill Electorate /Inner West PAC)

SUMMARY

 

An application has been received from AFL NSW/ACT to hold up to seven (7) AFLW matches at Henson Park Oval. The events require the temporary full road closure of Woodland Street, between Illawarra Road and dead-end, and Holmesdale Street, between Sydenham Road and Woodland Street, Marrickville to allow for pedestrian entry to Henson Park on the AFLW match days. It is recommended that Council agree to the temporary full road closures subject to the applicant complying with the above conditions.

 

Officers Recommendation:

 

That the proposed temporary full road closure (ENRC/2024/0043) of Woodland Street, between Illawarra Road and dead-end, and Holmesdale Street, between Sydenham Road and Woodland Street, Marrickville on  Sunday 22 September: 11:30am-3:30pm; Sunday 29 September: 3:30pm–7:30pm; Sunday 6 October: 11:30am-3:30pm; Sunday 13 October: 3:30pm–7:30pm; Saturday 19 October: 11:30am–4:30pm; and Saturday 26 October: 11.30am-4.30pm (contingency period of one month) for the purpose of holding up to seven (7) AFLW matches at Henson Park be approved, subject to the applicant complying with, but not limited to, the following conditions:

 

a)   A Road Occupancy License application be obtained by the applicant from the Transport Management Centre;

b)   All affected residents and businesses, including NSW Police Local Area Commander, Transit Systems, Fire and Rescue NSW and NSW Ambulance Services, shall be notified in writing by the applicant of the proposed temporary road closure at least 7 days prior to the event, with the applicant making reasonable provision for residents and businesses; and

c)   The occupation of the road carriageway must not occur until the road has been physically closed. 

 

DISCUSSION:

 

The Representative for the Member of Newtown noted that Council only notifies affected residents and businesses and advised this is insufficient notice to the wider community. The Representative for the Member of Newtown suggested that Council publish notices of events and road closures in parks so that people in the wider community are aware of upcoming events and road closures.

 

Council Officers advised that they would request Council’s Parks team to place notice of pending events within Henson Park. 

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

 

That the proposed temporary full road closure (ENRC/2024/0043) of Woodland Street, between Illawarra Road and dead-end, and Holmesdale Street, between Sydenham Road and Woodland Street, Marrickville on  Sunday 22 September: 11:30am-3:30pm; Sunday 29 September: 3:30pm–7:30pm; Sunday 6 October: 11:30am-3:30pm; Sunday 13 October: 3:30pm–7:30pm; Saturday 19 October: 11:30am–4:30pm; and Saturday 26 October: 11.30am-4.30pm (contingency period of one month) for the purpose of holding up to seven (7) AFLW matches at Henson Park be approved, subject to the applicant complying with, but not limited to, the following conditions:

 

a)   A Road Occupancy License application be obtained by the applicant from the Transport Management Centre;

b)   All affected residents and businesses, including NSW Police Local Area Commander, Transit Systems, Fire and Rescue NSW and NSW Ambulance Services, shall be notified in writing by the applicant of the proposed temporary road closure at least 7 days prior to the event, with the applicant making reasonable provision for residents and businesses; and

c)   The occupation of the road carriageway must not occur until the road has been physically closed. 

 

For Motion: Unanimous

 

LTC0824(1) Item 5     Fozzard Lane, Petersham - Proposed 'Shared Zone' treatment, 'No Parking' and 'No Stopping' restrictions (Damun-Stanmore Ward/Newtown Electorate/Inner West PAC)

SUMMARY

 

This report outlines current parking issues in Fozzard Lane and proposes the appropriate regulatory restrictions to improve parking operations. In addition, it also identifies and proposes a 10km/h Shared Zone treatment in the laneway to improve safety for pedestrians.

 

Officers Recommendation:

 

That the design plan for the installation of a ‘10km/h Shared Zone’ treatment (signs and line marking), ‘No Parking’ and ‘No Stopping’ restrictions in Fozzard Lane, Petersham, as detailed in Attachment 2 be approved, subject to TfNSW concurrence.

 

DISCUSSION:

 

Council Officers suggested to amend the recommendation wording from ‘subject to TfNSW concurrence’ to ‘following TfNSW approval.’

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

 

That the design plan for the installation of a ‘10km/h Shared Zone’ treatment (signs and line marking), ‘No Parking’ and ‘No Stopping’ restrictions in Fozzard Lane, Petersham, as detailed in Attachment 2 be approved, following TfNSW approval.

 

For Motion: Unanimous

 

LTC0824(1) Item 6     Liberty Street, Stanmore - Proposed pedestrian and bicycle crossing (Damun-Stanmore Ward/Newtown Electorate/Inner West PAC)

SUMMARY

 

The roundabout at Liberty Street at Railway Parade, Stanmore accommodates a wide range of road users including light and heavy vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians. The existing infrastructure provided at this roundabout can be improved to better balance the priority movement for cyclists and pedestrians, particularly in the east-west direction along the railway corridor between Railway Avenue and Trade Street where there is an existing bi-directional cycleway. The proposed pedestrian and bicycle crossing serves to improve connectivity and make active transport safer and efficient.

 

Officers Recommendation:

 

1.   That the at-grade pedestrian and bicycle crossing, kerb extension, speed cushions and associated signs and line markings as shown in Attachment 3 and 4 on Liberty Street, Stanmore, south of Railway Avenue be approved in principle for inclusion in Council’s Traffic Facility Capital Works Program and that a detailed design be brought back to the Committee for consideration.

 

2.   That Transport for NSW requested to consider the reduction of the existing speed limit on Liberty Street and Kingston Road, Stanmore from 60km/h to 50km/h.

 

DISCUSSION:

 

Council Officers advised that there was an error in the report (Table 2 –Pedestrian Volumes) and that the data in the ‘Required volume (minimum)’ column should read ‘20’ instead of ‘30’ however this error does not change the outcome of the report.

 

The Representative for the IWBC advised that the bike logos and linemarkings along Trade Street have faded and noted that the signage around that area was a bit confusing. Council Officers advised they will review the linemarking and signage along Trade Street.

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

 

1.   That the at-grade pedestrian and bicycle crossing, kerb extension, speed cushions and associated signs and line markings as shown in Attachment 3 and 4 on Liberty Street, Stanmore, south of Railway Avenue be approved in principle for inclusion in Council’s Traffic Facility Capital Works Program and that a detailed design be brought back to the Committee for consideration.

 

2.   That Transport for NSW requested to consider the reduction of the existing speed limit on Liberty Street and Kingston Road, Stanmore from 60km/h to 50km/h.

 

For Motion: Unanimous

 

 

LTC0824(1) Item 7     Eliza Street, Newtown – Temporary full road closure for a community event on Saturday 7 December 2024 – ENRC/2024/0035 (Damun-Stanmore Ward / Newtown Electorate / Inner West PAC)

SUMMARY

 

Council has been notified by Young Henrys Pty Ltd about a proposed temporary full road closure of Eliza Street, Newtown between Lennox Street and King Street, for an 18-hour period from 6:00am on Saturday 7 December 2024 to 12.00am midnight in order to hold the event ‘Young Henrys Newtown Festival 2024’. It is recommended that Council agree to the temporary full road closure subject to complying with all conditions as set out in this report.

 

Officers Recommendation:

That the proposed temporary full road closure of Eliza Street, between Lennox Street and King Street, Newtown for an 18-hour period from 6:00am Saturday 7 December 2024 to 12:00am midnight (contingency period 2 weeks) be approved, for the purpose of holding the event ‘Young Henrys Newtown Festival 2024’, subject to the following conditions and all standard Council conditions for a temporary full road closure:

a)   A Road Occupancy License (ROL) be obtained by the applicant from the Transport Management Centre (TMC);

b)   All affected residents and businesses, including the NSW Police Local Area Commander, Fire & Rescue NSW and NSW Ambulance Services be notified in writing, by the applicant, of the proposed temporary road closure at least 14 days in advance of the closure with the applicant making reasonable provision for stakeholders;

c)   A 4m wide emergency vehicle access must be maintained through the closed road areas during the course of the event; and

d)   The occupation of the road carriageway must not occur until the road has been physically closed.

 

DISCUSSION:

 

The Representative for the IWBC noted that the report does take into consideration how the road closure may affect cyclists. Council Officers have taken the feedback into consideration and advised they will speak to the applicant regarding taking into consideration the needs of cyclists in their planning.

 

Council Officers agreed and updated the approval to include a condition regarding bicycle detour signage.

 

The Committee members agreed with the amended recommendation.

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

That the proposed temporary full road closure of Eliza Street, between Lennox Street and King Street, Newtown for an 18-hour period from 6:00am Saturday 7 December 2024 to 12:00am midnight (contingency period 2 weeks) be approved, for the purpose of holding the event ‘Young Henrys Newtown Festival 2024’, subject to the following conditions and all standard Council conditions for a temporary full road closure:

a)   A Road Occupancy License (ROL) be obtained by the applicant from the Transport Management Centre (TMC);

b)   All affected residents and businesses, including the NSW Police Local Area Commander, Fire & Rescue NSW and NSW Ambulance Services be notified in writing, by the applicant, of the proposed temporary road closure at least 14 days in advance of the closure with the applicant making reasonable provision for stakeholders;

c)   A 4m wide emergency vehicle access must be maintained through the closed road areas during the course of the event; and

d)   The occupation of the road carriageway must not occur until the road has been physically closed.

e)  The Applicant to provide cycle detour signage at the event.

 

For Motion: Unanimous

 

LTC0824(1) Item 8     Wellington Street, Rozelle - Proposed Changes to Traffic and Parking Arrangements (Baludarri-Balmain Ward/Balmain Electorate/Leichhardt PAC)

SUMMARY

 

This report outlines the traffic congestion issues observed during the weekday morning peak period at Wellington Street, Rozelle between Victoria Road and Terry Street. It is proposed that the existing ‘Bus Zone’ and ‘2P 8am-6pm, Mon-Fri, Permit Holders Excepted, Area R1’ on the eastern side of Wellington Street be relocated to extend the vehicle storage length to provide more opportunities for vehicles exiting Wellington Street during a green signal phase at Victoria Road.

 

Officers Recommendation:

 

That the parking configuration along the eastern side of Wellington Street as shown in Attachment 1 be approved.

 

DISCUSSION:

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

 

That the parking configuration along the eastern side of Wellington Street as shown in Attachment 1 be approved.

 

For Motion: Unanimous

 

 

LTC0824(1) Item 9     Ramsay Street, Haberfield - Proposed New Raised Pedestrian Crossing (Gulgadya-Leichhardt Ward/Summer Hill Electorate/Burwood PAC)

SUMMARY

 

Council is planning to improve safety for pedestrians in Ramsay Street, Haberfield by upgrading the existing at-grade pedestrian crossing to a raised pedestrian crossing. The proposal aims to improve pedestrian and motorist safety by improving visibility and reducing vehicle speeds at the crossing.

 

This proposal creates one (1) additional car parking space in Alt Street and does not significantly change existing parking arrangements in Ramsay Street and Alt Street.

 

Officers Recommendation:

 

That the attached detailed design plan (Design Plan No.10259) for the proposed raised pedestrian crossing on Ramsay Street at the intersection with Alt Street, Haberfield be approved.

 

DISCUSSION:

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

 

That the attached detailed design plan (Design Plan No.10259) for the proposed raised pedestrian crossing on Ramsay Street at the intersection with Alt Street, Haberfield be approved.

 

For Motion: Unanimous

 

LTC0824(1) Item 10   Phillip Street, Petersham - Proposed 'No Stopping' restriction (Damun-Stanmore Ward/Newtown Electorate/Inner West PAC)

SUMMARY

 

This report outlines current parking issues at the intersection of Phillip and Margaret Streets, Petersham. Currently motorists are repeatedly parking near the intersection and affecting sight lines. A ‘No Stopping’ restriction is proposed to improve compliance with the road rule and maintain sight lines at this intersection.

 

Officers Recommendation:

 

That the proposed ‘No Stopping’ sign be installed on the eastern side of Phillip Street, Petersham, extending at a distance of 10m north from Margaret Street.

 

DISCUSSION:

 

The Committee members agreed with the Officer’s recommendation.

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

 

That the proposed ‘No Stopping’ sign be installed on the eastern side of Phillip Street, Petersham, extending at a distance of 10m north from Margaret Street.

 

For Motion: Unanimous

 

 

 

 

LTC0824(1) Item 11   Robert Street, Rozelle - Pedestrian And Bicycle Safety At Bus Stop (Baludarri - Balmain Ward/ Balmain Electorate/ Leichhardt PAC)

SUMMARY

 

This report details the various options suggested from the Member of Balmain regarding Pedestrian safety at the Bus Stop on south side of Robert Street between Victoria Road and Mullens Road, Rozelle. A report was previously considered by the Traffic Committee on 20 November 2023.

 

Council has reviewed the safety issues raised by a Rozelle resident at the existing Bus Stop and Shelter on the south side of Robert Street, Rozelle approximately 50m east of Victoria Road. There have been concerns and reports of near misses between pedestrians and bicycle riders at and near the bus shelter. With the Shared User Path having a downhill grade from Victoria Road, bicycle riders are prone to build up speed on the approach to the Bus Stop.

 

Officers Recommendation:

 

1.   That considering the recent upgrades announced from the NSW Government, interim linemarking be installed at the bus stop ID 203932 located in Robert Street between Victoria Road and Mullen Street, Rozelle.

 

2.   That Council request the NSW Government provide for a widened Shared User Path in Robert Street, Rozelle along the White Bay Power Station frontage including a physical barrier between the roadway and path.

 

DISCUSSION:

 

The Representative for the Member of Balmain noted Council’s interim solution of more line-marking at the bus stop and sending a request to the State Government to adjust property boundaries to accommodate a wider Shared User Path in Robert Street, Rozelle. The Representative for the Member of Balmain noted that the Government has announced a $17 million scheme for a number of improvements which includes an active transport connection from the White Bay Power Station to the Rozelle Parklands and Anzac Bridge and noted that it is likely that pedestrian and bicycle traffic will take this shortcut and ignore the alternative of a steep climb up to Victoria Road then down again past the Robert Street bus stop. The Representative for the Member of Balmain also noted that there is now a new pedestrian route at the Victoria Road/Robert Street signalised intersection which allows the crossing of Victoria Road on the north side of Robert Street. The Representative for the Member of Balmain advised that pedestrians could use the Robert Street, northern footpath whilst cyclists can use the steep downhill gradient to travel at the speed of the road and noted that this route may relieve the southern side of Robert Street and the issues at the bus stop of the remaining downhill cyclist traffic. The Representative for the Member of Balmain suggested that Council advise the State Government into action on the Anzac Bridge to Robert Street/Mullens Street short cut which will help alleviate the issue at the Robert Street bus stop.

 

The Representative for the IWBC noted that the new proposed cycle path from Anzac Bridge and Robert Street will only be opened for use when the White Bay Power Station holds events in the interim due to security concerns and questioned if Council could advocate for the permanent access of the cycle path for cyclists and pedestrians.

 

Council Officers suggested that Point 2. of the recommendation be amended to ‘That Council write to Placemaking NSW to formally have the property boundary adjusted to accommodate a wider Shared User Path in Robert Street, Rozelle along the White Bay Power Station frontage and that the new proposed cycle path from Anzac Bridge and Robert Street be opened for permanent cyclist/pedestrian access.’

 

The Committee members agreed with the amended recommendation.

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

 

1.   That considering the recent upgrades announced from the NSW Government, interim linemarking be installed at the bus stop ID 203932 located in Robert Street between Victoria Road and Mullen Street, Rozelle.

 

2.   That Council writes to Placemaking NSW to formally have the property boundary adjusted to accommodate a wider Shared User Path in Robert Street, Rozelle along the White Bay Power Station frontage and that the new proposed cycle path from Anzac Bridge and Robert Street be opened for permanent cyclist/pedestrian access.

 

For Motion: Unanimous

 

General Business:

 

Item 12: Extended school zone on Campbell Street for St Peters Public School

 

Council Officers advised that TfNSW have installed a 40km/h school zone for St Peters Public School along Campbell Street, to improve pedestrian safety during school zone times. The school zone extends from 10 metres east of Florence Street to 30 metres west of Princes Highway. It covers a length of 200 metres and will enhance safety for students and the local community.

 

 

Meeting closed at 12.11pm.

 

 

CHAIRPERSON

 

Jason Scoufis – Acting Traffic and Transport Planning Manager

 

 

 


Local Traffic Committee Meeting

16 September 2024

 

Item No:              LTC0924(1) Item 1

Subject:              The Boulevarde, Lilyfield -  Proposed Streetscape improvements and Civil Works (Baludarri - Balmain Ward/Balmain Electorate/Leichhardt PAC)           

Prepared By:      Charbel El Kazzi - Traffic Engineer 

Authorised By:  Jason Scoufis - Acting Traffic and Transport Planning Manager

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That the attached detailed design plan No.10278-A for the proposed streetscape improvements and civil works on The Boulevarde between Balmain Road and Joseph Street, Lilyfield be approved.

 

 

 

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE

This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:

2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

The Council is planning to undertake streetscape improvement works in The Boulevarde, Lilyfield.  The works are intended to improve pedestrian and motorist safety at the intersection of the Boulevarde and Balmain Road by constructing kerb extensions as well as improving the general amenity of the street by providing in-road trees, including repairing the road and footpaths.

 

The proposal works does not change the existing parking spaces in the street.

 

BACKGROUND

 

The detailed design plan shown in Attachment 1 outlines the proposed works on The Boulevarde, Lilyfield and includes the following:

 

·     Construct five (5) landscaped central median islands along the centreline of the road;

·     Provide trees and native landscaping within central median islands;

·     Construct new landscaped kerb blister islands with integrated footpaths and kerb ramps to improve pedestrian safety whilst reducing approach speeds in The Boulevarde at the intersection with Balmain Road;

·     Reset existing sandstone kerb and construct new concrete gutters on both sides (final extents to be determined at a later stage);

·     Reconstruct two (2) existing driveways as required to match the new kerb and gutter levels;

·     Reconstruct laybacks and entry thresholds on both sides of unnamed lane to make more pedestrian friendly;

·     Reconstruct damaged sections of concrete footpaths on both sides of the street (final extent to be determined at a later stage);

·     Remove the damaged road surface and resurface with new asphalt (final extent to be determined at a later stage and subject to final budget allocations);

·     Provide new pavement line markings as indicated in plan; and

·     Install signage associated with the works as shown in plans.

 

DISCUSSION

 

A letter outlining the proposal was issued to the properties shown in the distribution map below. Twenty submissions were received in response to this proposal with 11 in support and 9 opposed. Comments in relation to the proposal are summarised within the below table.

 

 

Following feedback received during the consultation, the design plan has been revised to replace the total number of trees and the tree species. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Resident Comments

Officer Comments

The tree planting – Jacaranda mimosifolia grow to a height of 15 metres and a width of 10 metres and have invasive root systems.  Many of the homes on the western side of The Boulevarde currently enjoy views to the city.  A 15m high tree will block these views and adversely affect their property values.

The trees drop very large quantities of flowers, leaves and seed pods which are a nuisance to clean up and will

• require regular street sweeping to prevent the tree litter from blocking the stormwater drains.

• result in their small leaves and flowers falling into and blocking vents on cars which can cause a build-up of dust/dirt/mud which retains moisture and causing premature rusting in the vehicle.

• result in risk of damage from seed pods falling onto cars or dropped flowers which become mushy, stick to cars and can stain/mark the paint work

• fallen flowers are slippery and can cause a risk to people crossing the road.

Many of the houses in The Boulevarde are either terraces and/or have their side walls constructed up to the side boundaries with no north facing windows. This means they rely on windows in the eastern and western facing walls to allow natural light to penetrate into them. The size of the proposed planting when mature will result in severely reducing natural light into these homes. (6 similar comments)

Council has noted the feedback received and has decided to replace the proposed Jacaranda Trees with Fraxinus Pennsylvanica Urbanite. This species is expected to grow 12m in height and a canopy width of 8m.

 

Council has also reduced the overall number of in-road trees from fifteen (15) to ten (10). This will space the trees out more and reduce the density of the tree canopy of the in-road trees.

 

Council will be responsible for the on-going maintenance of the trees and landscaping within the central median island. Maintenance will be undertaken as needed as part of an overall maintenance program.

It is unclear what benefit constructing five landscaped central median islands would provide to the amenity and safety of the street. Currently, the wide street provides a clear view of pedestrians and cars, promoting safety in the street. We are concerned that the median islands will create a serious safety issue for pedestrians and motorists. The median islands with significant trees and plantings will obstruct the view of oncoming pedestrians crossing the street (particularly young people who are small), block the views of some residents entering/exiting their driveway which could lead to accidents. Of particular concern is that children play in the street and in the existing trees

The central median islands will act as traffic calming devices which will slow down traffic and provide better opportunity for pedestrians to cross in between the gaps.

 

Note that the islands are midblock treatments and will be low level with native grass at approximately 400-500mm in height. This will have minimal impact on visibility for motorists.

 

 

Narrowing of roadway – we feel the proposed road lane width is too narrow – Australian road standards for a traffic lane is 3.5m with a 1m clearance to barriers or structures.  Even if the clearance to the central island was reduced to 0.5m this would only leave a 2.05m parking lane.  Public transport buses regularly using our street as well as garbage & other trucks which would pose a risk of damage to both the trees planted in the centre of the road and parked cars.

6.05m of space between the kerb and the central island is provided. This is adequate space to accommodate parking and one way travel along each side of the road. A turning path assessment undertaken has demonstrated that there is adequate space for an 8.8m service vehicle to travel.

The current width of The Boulevarde affords drivers ability to see traffic more clearly than other streets along Balmain Road. Entering and exiting is easier from The Boulevarde due to the width of the street. Adding kerb extensions will restrict visibility and make it more challenging to enter The Boulevarde southbound off Balmain Road and any vehicle waiting to turn right into Balmain Road will prevent any vehicles behind them from turning left. (1 similar comment)

This location was identified as under the Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan as a location requiring safety improvements due to its “long crossing” width.   As a result, a “road narrowing” treatment in the form of kerb extensions are being introduced to shorten the pedestrian walking distance. Turning movements for vehicles have been checked and the proposal is appropriate to cater for all required turn movements, including service vehicles.

Improvements to pedestrian safety will outweigh any negative impact on traffic delays.

Any rework of the original Sandstone block gutters would potentially change established Surveyor markers along the street adding substantial disruption, necessary further survey work and extra costs for any future building work/any development applications for residents. (1 similar comment)

Prior to the commencement of any works, any existing State Survey or cadastral reference marks affected by works would be located by a Registered Surveyor to apply to Land Registry Services for permission to remove such marks. Upon receiving approval, the Registered Surveyor will document the existing marks in the street, then return to site after construction works are complete, to re-establish new marks to the satisfaction of Land Registry Services. This is a standard process that Council follows in all such construction works.

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

The works are expected to cost approximately $800,000 and is funded under Council’s Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP) program, Councils Capital Works and Tree program.

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

The Boulevarde, Lilyfield - Plan

 

 


Local Traffic Committee Meeting

16 September 2024

 




Local Traffic Committee Meeting

16 September 2024

 

Item No:              LTC0924(1) Item 2

Subject:              Derbyshire Road, Leichhardt - Sydney Secondary College Leichhardt - Proposed Kerb Extension (Baludarri-Balmain Ward/Balmain Electorate/Leichhardt PAC)           

Prepared By:      Jackie Ng - Graduate Traffic Engineer 

Authorised By:  Jason Scoufis - Acting Traffic and Transport Planning Manager

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

1.          That the proposed kerb extension, footpath, and ramps on Derbyshire Road, Leichhardt between Pioneer Memorial Park and the rear gate of Sydney Secondary College Leichhardt as shown in Figure 1 be supported in principle and included for consideration in Council’s Capital Works program.

 

2.          That the interim measures, including a painted chevron, two W6-1A pedestrian warning signs, and an 8.0m length ‘No Stopping’ zone at the east side of Derbyshire Road, Leichhardt near the rear gate of Sydney Secondary College Leichhardt as shown in Figure 2 be approved for installation.

 

 

 

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE

 

This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:

2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

This report outlines the pedestrian safety issues raised by Sydney Secondary College Leichhardt on Derbyshire Road, Leichhardt between Pioneer Memorial Park and the rear gate of the school. It is proposed that a kerb extension be installed as a long-term treatment to assist pedestrians crossing Derbyshire Road during community, sporting and school events. A short term proposed ‘No Stopping’ zone, warning signs and line marking is recommended to be installed as an interim measure.

 

BACKGROUND

 

Council has received concerns from Sydney Secondary College Leichhardt regarding the safety of pedestrians when crossing between Pioneer Memorial Park and the rear gate of the school on Derbyshire Road, Leichhardt. This section of Derbyshire Road currently has no pedestrian facilities and has unrestricted parking along the eastern side of the road and ‘No Parking’ on the western side. The school has raised a safety issue where groups of students and hall users are being forced to walk between parked vehicles, and as a result, having limited visibility of oncoming traffic in Derbyshire Road.

 

The rear gate of the school provides access to the school hall and is used by groups of pedestrians during many scheduled community events such as sports training and fixtures, elections, and evening events.

 

It is proposed that a kerb extension, footpath and kerb ramps be installed at the rear of Sydney Secondary College Leichhardt to assist with students and pedestrians crossing Derbyshire Road, Leichhardt as shown in Figure 1. The treatment will provide a safer dedicated crossing facility for pedestrians and will improve visibility between oncoming traffic and pedestrians.


Figure 1 – Proposed Pedestrian Crossing Treatment

Additionally, it is proposed that an interim treatment of an 8.0m length ‘No Stopping’ zone, supplemented by a line marked chevron, and ‘Pedestrian Warning’ signs be installed on each approach as shown in Figure 2.


Figure 2 – Proposed Interim Treatment

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

Initial estimate of the proposed kerb extension, footpath and ramps would be approximately $23,000.

 

Works are to be considered as part of Council’s Capital Works program for Traffic Facilities with final costing to be finalised following completion of detailed design.

 

The cost of installation of the proposed interim treatment can be funded within Council’s signs and line marking budget.

 

ATTACHMENTS

Nil.

 


Local Traffic Committee Meeting

16 September 2024

 

Item No:              LTC0924(1) Item 3

Subject:              IW@40 - Area 6 Enmore & Marrickville East; Area 7 Marrickville & Tempe - Proposed speed limit reduction from 50km/h to 40 km/h (Midjuburi-Marrickville & Damun-Stanmore Wards/ Heffron,Summer Hill & Newtown Electorates/Inner West PAC)           

Prepared By:      James Nguyen - Traffic Engineer 

Authorised By:  Jason Scoufis - Acting Traffic and Transport Planning Manager

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That the proposed signage and line marking plans for the reduction in posted speed limit from 50km/h to 40km/h in all local roads in Areas 6 and 7 of the innerwest@40study of Enmore, Marrickville and Tempe be approved.

 

 

 

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE

 

This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:

2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

At the Council meeting on Tuesday 5 March 2024, Council adopted the Inner West@40 “Investigation in Potential Local Road Speed Limit Reductions” Study and would seek approval and funding from Transport for NSW (TfNSW) to expedite the implementation of 40km/h speed limits on all local streets within the Inner West Local Government Area (LGA).

 

TfNSW have approved the reduction in speed limit from 50km/h to 40km/h on all local streets within the Inner West LGA and Council was successful in receiving grant funding (approximately $1.8M) under the 2024-2025 Safe Speed Program to undertake the necessary implementation work (signage and linemarking) for two of the high priority areas: Area 6 – Enmore & Marrickville East and Area 7 – Marrickville & Tempe.

 

Proposed signs and linemarking plans are enclosed.

 

BACKGROUND

 

Council’s Integrated Transport Strategy, ‘GOING PLACES’, has identified a key project of reducing the speed limit from 50 km/h to 40 km/h on the local road network within the Inner West Council Area. Accordingly, Council commissioned Beca Consulting to prepare the Innerwest@40 Study. The study found that reductions in signposted speed limits are likely to significantly improve safety with only minimal impacts on travel times.

 

The Innerwest@40 Study adopted in Council Meeting, March 2024 has identified priority areas for the staged implementation of the area-wide 40km/h limit in the Council area. This is shown in Figure 1 below.

The reduction of speed limit to 40km/h in our local streets for the Area 6: Enmore & Marrickville East and Area 7: Marrickville & Tempe are proposed to be implemented first. These areas have been identified as “Priority A” under the Inner West@40 study as they have existing street environments that generally make streets self-enforcing to the proposed 40km/h speed limit in line with TfNSW’s expectation for the rollout.

Figure 1 - Prioritisation of 40km/h speed limit reduction (source: Innerwest@40 Study)

 

DISCUSSION

The Inner West@40 report has presented that 60% of roads within the LGA were recorded to have 85th percentile speed of below 40km/h. Area’s 6 and 7 both have a high proportion of the local road network with design speeds (85th percentile) of 45 km/h and below (shown in Figure 2). This is due to the narrow streets which acts as a form of traffic calming, particularly in Marrickville, Tempe and Enmore.

 

The 85th percentile speeds (as indicated in the report by BECA) are generally at or below the existing posted speed limit of 50km/h with the average 85th percentile speed within Area 6 and 7 being approximately 37-38km/h with 50 percent of the streets within areas 6 and 7 having an 85% speed of less than 38km/h. Most of the streets under 38km/h would be located in the Enmore area. (It should be noted that the data collected is not tube count data and is based on vehicles fitted technology that utilizes cloud collecting speeds from vehicles. The data is taken over the entire segment of roadway rather than at the highest point. The sample size in terms of traffic volume using this method is small. It should also be noted that there are discrepancies in this form of data collection versus the tube count data).

 

Figure 2- 85th Percentile Speed Profile

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accordingly, any local street that has a recorded 85th percentile speed of less than 45 km/h falls within acceptable limits and is consider self-enforcing. It is proposed to install entry treatments in the form of new 40km/h Area entry signs and pavement patches to these local roads (shown in Figures 3 and 4). Local streets identified to be slightly higher than the benchmark of 45km/h will require additional speed reduction treatment to provide an environment that will be self-enforcing. These streets are listed in Table 1 below and the line marking plans are provided in Attachment 1. It should be noted that no calibration of the collected cloud speed data was undertaken for the Marrickville and Tempe areas. In this respect, the streets listed in the table below are an initial list based on the Beca report data. Calibration of the data will need to be undertaken and this may reveal additional streets within the Marrickville and Tempe areas (areas 6 and 7) which will also require treatment.

 

Street

Suburb

Area

Treatment

Carrington Road

Marrickville

7

 centre line and edge line

Myrtle Street

Marrickville

7

 centre line and edge line

Victoria Road

Marrickville

7

 2 x edge lines and 1 x centreline

Sydney Street

Marrickville

7

 2 x edge lines and 1 x centreline

Petersham Road

Marrickville

7

 1 x centre line

Barwon Park Road

St Peters

6

 Centre Line linemarking

Bright Street

Marrickville

6

 Parking lane and centre line linemarking

Church Street

Camperdown

6

 Parking lane and centre line linemarking

Cook Road

Marrickville

6

 Parking lane and centre line linemarking

Fitzroy Street

Marrickville

6

 Centre Line linemarking 

Table 1 – Streets requiring additional speed reduction treatments

Figure 3 –Proposed Entry Treatment Locations

Figure 4 – Example of Entry Treatment Signages

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

Grant funding has been provided for approximately $1.8M received under the Safe Speed Program from Transport for NSW (TfNSW) for the 2024/25 financial year.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

Line marking plans

 

 


Local Traffic Committee Meeting

16 September 2024

 












Local Traffic Committee Meeting

16 September 2024

 

Item No:              LTC0924(1) Item 4

Subject:              Newtown South Local Area Traffic Management Plan (LATM) Final Report (Damun-Stanmore Ward/Newtown Electorate/Inner West PAC)           

Prepared By:      Jason Scoufis - Acting Traffic and Transport Planning Manager 

Authorised By:  Manod Wickramasinghe - Acting Director Infrastructure

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That the treatments listed below from the Newtown South Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Final Report be listed for consideration in Council’s Traffic Facilities Program and Operational linemarking/signposting program and prioritised as identified in the attached report:

a)   Reconstruct the existing raised pedestrian (zebra) crossing incorporating kerb extensions in Alice Street west of Hawken Street.

b)   Upgrade the existing pedestrian refuge in Alice Street west of Pearl Street into a raised pedestrian (zebra) crossing.

c)   Upgrade the existing pedestrian refuge in Alice Street west of Walenore Avenue into a raised pedestrian (zebra) crossing and upgrade the median island in Walenore Avenue.

d)   That widened median island be installed to cross Dickson Street at King Street.

e)   That a continuous footpath treatment be installed to cross Wells Street at King Street.

f)    That a continuous footpath treatment be installed to cross Darley Lane at King Street.

g)   That a raised platform be installed at the John Street/Darley Street intersection including No Stopping at the intersection subject to a risk assessment to determine length of No Stopping.

h)   That a raised platform be installed at the John Street/Lord Street intersection including No Stopping subject to a risk assessment to determine length of No Stopping.

i)    That subject to TfNSW approval, a 10km/h Shared Zone be installed in Alice Lane between Walenore Avenue and Holmwood Street and Alice Lane be converted to one way eastbound between Pearl Lane and Walenore Avenue.

j)    The footpath be widened on the southern side of Lord Street between King Street and the railway station access.

k)   Install statutory 10 metres of No Stopping restrictions at the Pearl Street/Wells Street intersection.

l)    Install No Stopping restrictions at the Laura Street/Commodore Street intersection.

m)  Modify the existing timed parking restrictions from ‘No Parking 8:30am-6:00pm Mon-Fri’ to ‘No Parking 8:30am-6:00pm Mon-Sat’ on the eastern side of Edgeware Road between Llewellyn Street and Victoria Road.

n)   Install a raised pedestrian/cyclist crossing in Edgeware Road south of Bedwin Road with kerb extensions and median splitter island.

o)   Paint road bends red in Wells Street at Commodore Street and Wells Street at John Street and improve pedestrian connection through the road closure by removing step.

p)   Install Pedestrian Warning (l) sign   and supplementary ‘disabled’ sign at Edgeware Road/Llewellyn Street/Alice Street intersection facing northbound motorists in Edgeware Road

q)   Replace existing road closure gate in Pearl Lane at Dickson Street to allow for cyclist’s access through the road closure.

r)   Request TfNSW implement 40 km/h speed limit on Local Roads within the study area and a reduced speed limit on Regional Roads as per innerwest@40 study.

s)   Linemark additional bicycle logos in Alice Street, Pearl Street, John Street, Darley Street, Lord Street and Edgeware Road.

t)    Request TfNSW investigate installing a signalised pedestrian crossing on the southern leg of the King Street/Alice Street traffic signals.

u)   Further investigation into road safety improvements at the Victoria Road/Edgeware Road intersection to improve conditions for right turn movements from Victoria Road into Edgeware Road be undertaken.  

 

 

 

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE

 

This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:

2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

This report outlines the findings of the Final Newtown South LATM Study report.

 

The final draft report was placed on public exhibition in May 2024.  A total of 30 contributions were made through YSIW. An additional 39 emails were received regarding the final draft report during the public exhibition period. All recommendations noted in the final draft have been included in the final report with some adjustments.

 

The response results indicate that the community generally supported all the proposed changes with a support rate through Yoursay Inner West of 57% to 86% for each of the recommendations.  

 

After considering the Public Exhibition feedback, a review on the proposed scheme was undertaken with adjustments made to a few of the LATM Study recommendations.

 

The recommended treatments will be included for consideration for funding in Council’s Capital Works Program and submitted for State/Federal Government Funding Programs where possible. Minor changes to signs and linemarking will be funded out of Council’s Operational Budgets. 

 

BACKGROUND

 

As part of Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Strategy Review Program, Council has prepared the Newtown South LATM study. The final report is provided in Attachment 1.

 

The Newtown South LATM Area is bounded by Edgeware Road, King Street (Princes Highway), Alice Street, and Lord Street.

 

In developing recommendations for the LATM Study, consideration was given to incorporate the following principals of Local Area Traffic Management:

·    Reduction in vehicle speeds.

·    Minimise traffic levels and intruding traffic in a local street.

·    Minimise crash risk.

·    Improve local amenity by:

Reducing car use

Increasing use of public transport

Increasing walking and cycling

Improving the streetscape

 

Traffic tube counts and intersection counts were collected, and crash history was reviewed to assist the study. Further site observations and review of community engagement outcomes also assisted to determine what type of facility was warranted in specific locations.

 

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

 

Council undertook an initial survey through Council’s Your say website in May 2022 with invitation letters mailed out to stakeholders and residents within the study area to determine existing issues and ideas. A total of 191 responses were received through the online survey and a further 20 through the mapping tool.

 

The main outcomes of the first stage of consultation identified by the greatest number of respondents are high traffic volumes, followed by pedestrian safety and the third most raised issue was heavy vehicles using local roads.

 

Regarding specific streets, Edgeware Road, Alice Street and King Street had the highest level of concern for too much traffic, pedestrian safety, heavy vehicle uses and excessive speed.

Lord Street also had a level of concern for rat running and exceeding the speed limit.

 

The final draft report was placed on public exhibition in May 2024.  A total of 30 contributions were made through YSIW. An additional 39 emails were received regarding the final draft report during the public exhibition period. All recommendations noted in the final draft have been included in the final report with some adjustments.

 

The recommendation for ‘No Stopping’ restrictions in Wells Street at Edgeware Road was separately approved in June 2024 in a delegated report, hence has been removed from the traffic committee recommendation. Similarly, the red holding arrows at the Alice Street/Edgeware Road/Llewellyn Street traffic signals recommended in the study have been installed.    

 

The Engagement Outcomes Report is included in Attachment 2 and its appendices in Attachment 3.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The cost of the proposed treatments is $774,950 (including GST and contingencies). This includes the costs associated with the modified recommendations. 

 

Once the LATM Study is adopted, detailed design and construction would be undertaken in stages as prioritised commencing from the 2025/2026 year. This does not include the costs associated with the upgraded pedestrian crossings in Wells Street and Laura Street as detailed in Item 7 and Item 8 of the final recommendations as they are already listed for construction in the 2024/2025 Capital Works Budget.  

 

The cost to implement the Newtown South LATM Study will be included for consideration for funding in Council’s Capital Works Program and submitted for State/Federal Government Funding Programs where possible. Minor changes to signs and linemarking will be funded out of Council’s Operational Budgets.  Council staff will pursue funding opportunities for State and Federal Government Grant Funding Programs including the Blackspot Program, Get NSW Active Program and the Road Safety Program. Subsequent reports during implementation of the recommendations of the study will provide further detailed plans if required.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

Attachment 1 Newtown South LATM Study - Final Report

2.

Attachment 2 Engagement Outcomes Report

3.

Attachment 3 Engagement Outcomes Report Appendices

 

 


Local Traffic Committee Meeting

16 September 2024

 





























Local Traffic Committee Meeting

16 September 2024

 








































Local Traffic Committee Meeting

16 September 2024

 


















































Local Traffic Committee Meeting

16 September 2024

 

Item No:              LTC0924(1) Item 5

Subject:              Marrickville Road at Despointes Street, Marrickville – Proposed new raised pedestrian crossing - Design Plan 10297 (MIDJUBURI-MARRICKVILLE WARD / SUMMER HILL ELECTORATE / INNER WEST PAC)                                  

Prepared By:      Jennifer Adams - Traffic Engineer 

Authorised By:  Jason Scoufis - Acting Traffic and Transport Planning Manager

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That the detailed design plan for the proposed new raised pedestrian crossing on Marrickville Road at Despointes Street, Marrickville and associated signs and line markings (as per Design Plan No.10297) be approved.

 

 

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE

 

This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:

2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Council is planning to improve safety in Marrickville Road, Marrickville by constructing a new raised pedestrian crossing near Despointes Street to replace the existing “at-grade” flat pedestrian crossing. The proposal aims to improve pedestrian safety by better defining the safe pedestrian crossing point and addresses concerns for pedestrian safety and driver behaviour at this location. It is noted that Council has received Blackspot funding to raise the crossing.

 

BACKGROUND

A Blackspot funding application was submitted in 2023 to convert an existing at-grade pedestrian crossing to a raised pedestrian crossing on Marrickville Road at Despointes Street, Marrickville. There were a number of pedestrian related injury crashes at the location.

 

The existing at-grade pedestrian crossing on Marrickville Road, west of Despointes Street, Marrickville is located within the Marrickville Town Centre. The crossing is located within an existing 40 km/h High Pedestrian Activity Area which commences at the intersection of Petersham Road (a signalised intersection). There is an at-grade entry pavement treatment along the eastbound carriageway denoting the commencement of the 40 km/h HPAA, however there is no secondary raised treatment following. This conversion addresses two issues: reducing vehicle speeds on approaches to the pedestrian crossing and addresses the existing pedestrian related crashes by providing a raised traffic calming device following the at-grade entry 40km/h treatment to reduce vehicle speeds. Marrickville Road is a Regional road and the section through Marrickville Town Centre carries around 15,000 vehicles per day.

 

This report details the design plan for those improvement works and its related consultation results.  

 

 

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

The project is listed in Council’s Traffic Facilities Capital Works budget for 2024/2025 and Blackspot funding of $151,000 has been received for this project. Project number is 303399.

 

OTHER STAFF COMMENTS

The following works are proposed and are illustrated on the attached Consultation Plan (Plan No. 10297). The proposed works aim to improve pedestrian safety by better defining the safe pedestrian crossing point and addresses concerns for pedestrian safety and driver behaviour at this location.

 

Specifically, the proposed scope of works includes the following:

 

·    Construct a new raised concrete pedestrian crossing to replace the existing “at-grade” flat pedestrian crossing. (Refer to attached Plans):

·    Install associated signage associated with the works as required and where shown on Plans.

 

 

Parking changes

 

The proposal will not impact the existing parking arrangements in the street. Therefore, there will be no loss of parking spaces resulting from the proposed works.

 

Streetlighting

 

The existing pedestrian crossing lighting is deemed appropriate to meet the current lighting standards for new pedestrian crossings.  Therefore, no changes are proposed to the existing street lighting due to the works.

 

Please note however that Ausgrid is progressively replacing all existing streetlights throughout the Local Government area with new energy efficient and environmentally friendly LED streetlights, and this will be completed independently of this project.

 

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Consultation was conducted between 12 August 2024 and 30 August 2024.  A letter along with a copy of the design plan was sent to residents / businesses in the immediate locality. A total of 136 letters were distributed. There were no responses.

 

 

CONCLUSION

It is recommended that the detailed design plan of the proposed new raised pedestrian crossing and associated signs and line markings be supported to improve road safety at this location.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

303399-10297-ConsultationPlan

 

 


Local Traffic Committee Meeting

16 September 2024

 



Local Traffic Committee Meeting

16 September 2024

 

Item No:              LTC0924(1) Item 6

Subject:              Clissold Street, between Queen Street and Victoria Street, Ashfield- Proposed removal of existing at-grade crossing and provide a new raised pedestrian (zebra) crossing. (Djarrawunang-Ashfield Ward/Summer Hill Electorate/Burwood PAC.)           

Prepared By:      Boris Muha - Traffic Engineer 

Authorised By:  Jason Scoufis - Acting Traffic and Transport Planning Manager

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That the detailed design plan (10296) for the proposed new raised pedestrian (zebra) crossing in Clissold Street, just east of gate No.11 to the Cardinal Freeman Village (near William Street), and the removal of the at-grade pedestrian crossing further east in Clissold Street, between Queen Street and Victoria Road, Ashfield, as shown in Attachment 1 be approved.

      

 

 

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE

 

This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:

2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

Council at its meetings on the 18 March 2024 (through its Traffic Committee 11 December 2023) approved in principle, subject to detailed design, a series of proposed pedestrian (zebra) crossings and kerb extension treatments (under concept) for improved pedestrian and road safety around and near to the Cardinal Freeman (Retirement) Village, Ashfield. 

 

This report describes and shows the detailed design plan of one of the proposed treatments, i.e. install a proposed new raised pedestrian (zebra) crossing in Clissold Street, just east of gate No.11 to the Cardinal Freeman Village (near William Street), and the removal of the existing at-grade pedestrian crossing further east in Clissold Street, between Queen Street and Victoria Road. This work is programmed and envisaged to be constructed in the 2024/2025 financial year, subject to funding. 

 

BACKGROUND

 

The Cardinal Freeman Village (currently known as Levande Cardinal Freeman) is bounded by Clissold Street to the north, Victoria Street to the east, Seaview Street to the south and Queen Street to the west.

 

The village caters to an independent living lifestyle however as the average age is over 82 years there are a significant number of residents with mobility issues that hinder their ability to move around freely.

 

Many of the elderly residents are capable, and desire to walk to and from various destinations outside of the village, and/or take other forms of public transportation (e.g., bus and train) to travel to other parts of Sydney.

 

This has prompted a general request from the elderly residents to improve pedestrian safety around the village to enable them to walk to various desired destinations and take public transport within the area.

 

Other Aged care facilities such as the Ashfield Baptist Homes, Bethel Nursing Homes, Ashfield Terrace Care Community, and other community facilities are also located adjacent or near to the Cardinal Freeman Village.

 

The proposed treatment in this report received a major (80% rate) support under a general community engagement consultation conducted through Council’s ‘Have Your Say’ back in October 2023. The facility is viewed in benefit and supported by the community at large, and not only for the elderly of the Cardinal Freeman Village.              

 

DISCUSSION

The following information is provided in discussion.

                       

Figure 1. Locality Plan


 

 

Street Name

 

Clissold Street 

(Near Victoria Street)

Carriageway width (m) kerb to kerb

Approx. 6.7-7.0m

Carriageway type

Two-way, one travel lane each direction.

Classification

Local

Speed Limit

km/h

50

85th percentile speed

km/h

47.2

Vehicles per day (vpd)

2109

Last available 5 years of TfNSW recorded crash history

 

NIL in last 5 years in Clissold Street (Queen Street to Victoria Street)

1 prior recorded accident in 2015 resulted in pedestrian on carriageway being hit by vehicle in area of existing crossing (RUM 3)  - moderate injury.

Parking arrangements

Parking not permitted on both sides between William Street and Victoria Street. Parking permitted on north side between William Street and Queen Street. 

Side street(nearest)

William Street

Table 1. Road Network detail

The Plan

The following works are proposed and are illustrated on the attached plans:

Clissold Street (between William Street & Victoria Street), Ashfield (Plan No. 10296):

·   Construct a new raised concrete pedestrian crossing with “gutter bridge” crossings closer to William Street to replace the existing “at-grade” flat pedestrian crossing approximately 35m to the east. The existing pedestrian crossing to the east and associated kerb ramps will be removed (refer to attached Plan):

·   Construct new concrete kerb & gutter on the north side of Clissold Street where shown;

·   Construct new concrete footpath in place of the existing damaged concrete footpath on               the north side of Clissold Street where shown;

·   Remove 1 existing street tree and transplant 1 existing street tree to a new location on the south side of Clissold Street to facilitate the construction of the new raised pedestrian crossing and to provide adequate site distances on the approach side;

·   Relocate/adjust existing ”No Stopping” & ”Bus Zone” signage on the south side of Clissold Street to satisfy sight distance and bus zone length requirements;

·   Provide new “edge” line markings either side of the new raised pedestrian crossing to provide guidance for the motorists;

·   Install associated signage associated with the works as required and where shown on the Plans;

·   Resurface the road pavement with new asphalt. Note: - this will be subject to final budget         allocations at the time of the project being implemented and may be undertaken at a later or prior date within the Local Roads Capital Program.

 

 

 

Parking Changes

The existing Bus Zone and No Stopping Zones on the south side of Clissold Street will be adjusted slightly to accommodate the new raised pedestrian crossing. However, this will not impact on existing parking arrangements in the street. Please refer to the attached plan.

Streetlighting

The new raised pedestrian crossing will require new flood lighting to be provided for it to comply with current standards. This will involve the provision of at least 1 floodlight (on a new power pole) or up to 2 floodlights (on 2 new power poles) typical of other locations with pedestrian crossings. At this stage, this design is not complete and will be undertaken by a specialist lighting consultant at a later stage.

Other Information

The proposed raised pedestrian crossing to the east of gate 11 replaces the removed (at road level) zebra crossing at gate 12. The new raised pedestrian (zebra) crossing will be situated further west away of the conflict area of the Bus Stops and traffic turning in from Victoria Street and coming across Victoria Street from Clissold Street (east). 

 

Access to the Bus stops can be attained via Gate 11 or 12 with the new crossing going in just east of gate 11. The new crossing location can also provide connection to the northern side of Clissold Street to link pedestrian movement towards Queen Street and Victoria Street. 

 

Clissold Street is a Bus Route. The platform height of the crossing is 150mm high to blend in level with the footpath and provide appropriate ‘gutter bridge’ clearance over the kerb for drainage. The ramps are lengthened to 2.5m in this instance to provide appropriate bus rideability over the crossing. 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

The project is listed in Council’s Traffic Facilities Capital Works budget for works to be carried out in 2024/2025, subject to funding. The work is estimated to be around $90,000.

 

CONSULTATION

 

A letter outlining the proposal was mailed out to 8 properties (9 letters) in Clissold Street, Ashfield, between Queen Street and Victoria Street requesting residents’ views regarding the proposal. (see also map of consultation area Figure 2).

 

A copy of the letter was also sent directly to the Manager of the Cardinal Freeman Village to distribute amongst its elderly residents inviting them to comment also. 

 

(Levande) Cardinal Freeman Village                 A map of a neighborhood

Description automatically generated

Figure 2. Map on Consultation Area

 

(1) Resident response was received concerning tree planting and floodlighting of the crossing. 

 

The concerns raised by the resident are outlined below in the table.

 

Residents Comments

Officers Response

· Request not to replant one existing tree in new location which might limit vision of oncoming traffic.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

· Are floodlights really necessary? These will have an impact on nearby residents.

·   It is proposed to remove 1 tree just east of Gate 11 to make way for the new raised pedestrian crossing.  It is also proposed to relocate (1) existing tree (between gate 11 and gate 12) to a new location east of Gate 12 to provide suitable unimpeded sight distance to the new pedestrian crossing.

 

Trees are an important part of the overall landscape and provide much needed tree canopy cover to the footpath environment.  The tree species has a moderately high canopy and therefore is considered suitable for its new (transplanted) location.

 

·   Council is required to provide lighting to all new pedestrian crossings compliant to the required Standards to ensure pedestrian safety - particularly at night. A lighting design will need to be prepared by a suitably qualified lighting consultant to meet this requirement. Council will endeavour to provide only the minimum required levels of lighting whilst still complying with the Standards.

 

 

 

 

CONCLUSION

It is recommended that the detailed design plan (10296) for the proposed new raised pedestrian (zebra) crossing in Clissold Street, just east of gate No.11 to the Cardinal Freeman Village (near William Street), and the removal of the at-grade pedestrian crossing further east in Clissold Street, between Queen Street and Victoria Road, Ashfield, as shown in Attachment 1 be approved.

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

Proposed plan of raised crossing and removal of existing at-grade crossing in Clissold Street, Ashfield.

 

 


Local Traffic Committee Meeting

16 September 2024

 



Local Traffic Committee Meeting

16 September 2024

 

Item No:              LTC0924(1) Item 7

Subject:              Flood Street, Leichhardt – Proposed Slow Point at Regent Street (GULGADYA-LEICHHARDT WARD/BALMAIN ELECTORATE/ LEICHHARDT PAC)           

Prepared By:      Charbel El Kazzi - Traffic Engineer 

Authorised By:  Jason Scoufis - Acting Traffic and Transport Planning Manager

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That the attached detailed design plan No.10269 for the proposed slow point on Flood Street at the intersection with Regent Street in Leichhardt be approved.

 

 

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE

This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:

2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Council is planning to improve safety in Flood Street, Leichhardt by constructing a slow point treatment at Regent Street. The proposal aims to improve cyclist and motorist safety at the intersection by reducing vehicle speeds at this location.

 

The proposed slow point will have no impact on the existing parking arrangements in the street. 

 

BACKGROUND

The detailed design plan shown in Attachment 1 outlines the proposed works on Flood Street, Leichhardt and includes the following:

·    Construction of two (2) new concrete central median islands;

·    Provide three (3) new painted chevron islands;

·    Remove existing green bicycle lane & replace with new bicycle logos;

·    Repaint edge lines and install associated signage and line marking associated with the works as required as detailed in the attached plan.

 

DISCUSSION

Street Name

Flood Street (at intersection with Regent Street) in Leichhardt

Kerb to Kerb Width (m)

Approximately 12.6m

Carriageway Type

Two-way, one travel lane each direction

Classification

Local

Speed Limit km/h

50

85th Percentile Speed km/h

54.7km/h (bidirectional)

Vehicles Per Day (vpd)

3,620 (bidirectional)

Available TfNSW recorded crash history last 5 years (2018-2023)

One (1) reported crash:

2019, RUM 21, at intersection with Regent Street, right through, moderate injury

Parking Arrangements

Unrestricted parking on both sides

Table 1: Road Network Detail

 

A letter outlining the proposal was issued to the properties shown in the distribution map below. Four (4) submissions were received in response to this proposal with two (2) responses in objection and two (2) in support. The comments are summarised within the below table.

 

 

 

Resident Comments

Officer Feedback

The ‘Keep Left’ signs on the median islands have a limited life span and are soon knocked down, again I suspect, by the speeding drivers.

 

When putting the slow point into Flood Street could we consider putting in speed bumps on both north and south bound lanes? This would get traffic to slow before negotiating the slow point.

Narrow Keep Left signs are being used as part of the project. Council will also replace any missing signage as part of its sign maintenance works.

 

The proposed slow point is intended to reduce approaching vehicle speeds without the need to have additional devices such as a speed hump.

I do have concerns on the width of the cycleway heading north on Flood St approaching the first chevron. I feel this is a pinch point for cyclists to be pushed into the door zone for parked cars on the left. Please consider some painted cycleway marking to keep cars to the right.

 

I also observe cars parking on the south-east corner of the intersection, where the chevrons are to be painted. I suggest a no stopping sign be erected to ensure cars do not park too close to the corner, blocking southbound traffic down Flood Street

The width of the cycleway heading north has remained unchanged and any proposal to move the cycleway to the traffic lane should be considered in a separate investigation.


The proposed chevrons are intended to discourage illegal parking close to the intersection. This will be monitored following the installation of the slow point, and additional No Stopping sign will be installed if there are concerning levels of illegal parking.

I am totally against the installation of new concrete median islands. I don’t see why more concrete needs to be installed.

 

The plan also mentions that the street lighting is adequate in this location. I don’t believe the street lighting is adequate in most of Flood St. I walk my dog at night and need to take a torch because it’s so dark.

The concrete islands were intended to reduce vehicle speeds, providing a traffic calming effect and improve road safety.

 

An existing streetlight is positioned at the intersection.

I suggest the use of Stop Signs at the intersection as opposed to the slow point treatment.

The slow point is intended to reduce vehicle speeds in Flood Street. A Stop sign treatment for Regent Street will not achieve the same speed reduction. Alternatively, a Stop control on Flood Street will result in a change of intersection priority which is not supported.

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

The works are expected to cost approximately $35,000 and are to be funded under Council’s Capital Works Program.

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

Flood Street at Regent Street, Leichhardt - Plan

 

 


Local Traffic Committee Meeting

16 September 2024

 



Local Traffic Committee Meeting

16 September 2024

 

Item No:              LTC0924(1) Item 8

Subject:              Alt Street, south of Albert Parade, Ashfield-Proposed raising of existing pedestrian (zebra) crossing adjacent to St. Vincent's College.(Gulgadya-Leichhardt Ward/Summer Hill Electorate/Burwood PAC)           

Prepared By:      Boris Muha - Traffic Engineer 

Authorised By:  Jason Scoufis - Acting Traffic and Transport Planning Manager

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That the detailed design plan (10256) to raise the existing at-grade pedestrian (zebra) crossing with associated signs and markings in Alt Street, Ashfield, just south of Albert Parade and adjacent to St Vincent’s College (including the ‘No Stopping at other times’ restriction at the rear of the part-time Bus zone being removed) be approved.

 

 

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE

 

This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:

2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Council is planning to improve safety in Alt Street, Ashfield by constructing a new Raised Pedestrian Crossing near Albert Parade to replace the existing “at-grade” flat pedestrian crossing adjacent to St Vincent’s College (formerly De La Salle College).

 

The proposal aims to improve pedestrian and motorist safety by better defining safe pedestrian crossing points and addresses pedestrian safety and driver behaviour at this location.

 

BACKGROUND

The proposed raising of the pedestrian crossing was identified in the Ashfield Traffic Management Strategy 2017. It has also been captured under a School Road Safety Program to eventually raise all at-grade pedestrian (zebra) crossings adjacent to various schools.     

 

DISCUSSION

The following information is provided in discussion.

Figure 1. Locality Plan

 

Street Name

 

Alt Street, Ashfield 

(Near Albert Parade)

Carriageway width (m) kerb to kerb

Approx. 10.1m

Carriageway type

Two-way, one travel lane each direction.

Classification

Local

Speed Limit

km/h

50

85th percentile speed

km/h

44.9

 Vehicles per day (vpd)

3390

Available TfNSW recorded crash history

Last 5 years

(2) accidents in the last 5 years. 

1 recorded accident in 2021, north of Elizabeth Street, o/s No.29- RUM 2- pedestrian far side- moderate injury.

1 recorded .accident in 2023, north of Albert Parade, o/s No.52- RUM 42-leaving parking-non-casualty tow -away.  

Parking arrangements

Unrestricted parking is permitted on  both sides with Bus zone(s) on the eastern side between Elizabeth Street and Albert Parade.

Side street(nearest)

Albert Parade.

  

Table 1. Road Network detail

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Plan

 

The following works are proposed and are illustrated on the attached plans:

 

Alt Street (at Albert Parade), Ashfield (Plan No. 10256):

 

·    Construct a new raised concrete pedestrian crossing with “gutter bridge” crossings to replace the existing “at-grade” flat pedestrian crossing. (Refer to attached Plan):

·    Relocate/adjust existing ”No Stopping” & ”Bus Zone” signage on the east side of Alt Street to satisfy sight distance and bus zone length requirements;

·    Install associated signage associated with the works as required and where shown on the Plan.

 

Parking Changes

 

The existing Bus Zone and No Stopping Zones on the east side of Alt Street will be adjusted slightly to accommodate the new raised pedestrian crossing.  However, this will not impact on existing parking arrangements around the area of the crossing.

 

Streetlighting

The new raised pedestrian crossing will require new flood lighting to be provided in order for it to comply with current standards. This will involve the provision of at least 1 (or 2) floodlight (s) on existing or new power poles typical of other locations with pedestrian crossings.  At this stage, this design is not complete and will be undertaken by a specialist lighting consultant at a later stage.

 

Additional Information.

 

The Local traffic committee at its meeting on the 17 June 2024 recommended in a separate report to relocate or shift the part time ‘Bus zone’ on the eastern side of Alt Street, outside the St Vincent’s College (premises no.45 Alt Street) so that the rear of the zone is set at a minimum of 10 metres away in departure of the crossing.

 

This was in anticipation of the crossing being upgraded and adherence to current TfNSW guidelines for sight view clearance around the pedestrian(zebra) crossing. The rear of the bus Zone is close to the departure side of the crossing and was originally installed using legacy RMS/RTA guidelines for sight view clearances. General parking was not permitted at other times near the crossing.

 

As the Bus zone will be wholly shifted at least 10 metres away of the crossing, the rear added restriction to the Bus Zone reading ‘No Stopping at other times’ is no longer applicable and can be recommended to be removed under this proposal to allow for general parking outside of the Bus zone hours.   

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

The project is listed on Council’s Traffic Facilities Capital Works budget for works to be carried out in 2024/2025, subject to funding. The work is estimated to be around $60,000.

 

CONSULTATION

 

A letter outlining the proposal was mailed out to (20) properties (316 letters) in Alt Street in vicinity of the crossing, requesting residents’ views regarding the proposal. (See also map of consultation area Figure 2).

 

Consultation Area.                                                         

Figure 2. Map on Consultation Area

 

 

(4) Resident responses were received with (2) supporting the proposal and (2) raising concerning with driveway access, floodlighting and speeding.

 

The concerns raised by the residents are outlined below in the table.

 

Residents Comments

Officers Response

Concern kerb blister (islands) will block my driveway.  

The proposed kerb blister (islands) are of the same length and envelope area as the existing islands. Adjoining driveway access will not change or be blocked due to the proposal.    

Concern speed hump will slow people down below the speed limit, suggest zig-zag lines instead.

Does not want flood lights for the new pedestrian crossing, as does not want intrusive lighting.

The aim is to physically slow vehicles down to make the crossing safer for pedestrians and improve accessibility over the crossing. Zig-Zag lines currently exist to alert motorists of the on-coming crossing over a crest.

Compliant lighting is required for a pedestrian crossing according to Australian Standards.

A lighting design will need to be prepared by a suitably qualified lighting consultant to meet this requirement. Council will endeavour to provide only the minimum required levels of lighting whilst still complying with the Standards.

  

CONCLUSION

It is recommended that the design plan (10256) to raise the existing at-grade pedestrian (zebra) crossing with associated signs and markings in Alt Street, Ashfield, just south of Albert Parade and adjacent to St Vincent’s College, as shown in Attachment 1 be approved, subject to the ‘No Stopping at other times’ restriction at the rear of the part-time Bus zone being removed.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

Proposed raising of pedestrian crossing in Alt Street, Ashfield.

 

 


Local Traffic Committee Meeting

16 September 2024

 



Local Traffic Committee Meeting

16 September 2024

 

Item No:              LTC0924(1) Item 9

Subject:              Ryan Street, Lilyfield (at Joseph Street) – Proposed Landscaped Kerb Blister Island (BALUDARRI-BALMAIN WARD/BALMAIN ELECTORATE/LEICHHARDT PAC)
           

Prepared By:      Charbel El Kazzi - Traffic Engineer 

Authorised By:  Jason Scoufis - Acting Traffic and Transport Planning Manager

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That the attached detailed design plan No.10299 for the proposed landscaped kerb blister island, bollards, road re-sheeting and associated new signage on Ryan Street at the intersection with Joseph Street, Lilyfield be approved.

 

 

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE

 

This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:

2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Council is planning to construct a landscaped kerb blister island outside the property No. 62 Ryan Street, Lilyfield. The proposal aims to protect the heritage awning and its posts from turning vehicles at this intersection.

 

It is noted that there will be no loss of on-street parking due position of the kerb blister island being installed within the existing ‘No Stopping’ zone.

 

BACKGROUND

 

The proposal for the construction of a landscaped kerb blister island in Ryan Street at the intersection with Joseph Street outside 62 Ryan Street, Lilyfield was approved by the Local Traffic Committee on 20 November 2023, with the project to be listed in Council’s capital works program.

 

The detailed design plan shown in Attachment 1 outlines the proposed works on Ryan Street and Joseph Street, Lilyfield and includes the following:

 

•     Construct a landscaped kerb blister island in front of No.62 Ryan Street with landscaping to be suitable species of native grasses;

•     Install associated signage associated with the works as shown in the plan;

•     Provide two bollards within the footpath to help protect the two awning posts.

 

Ryan Street is a local road with a speed limit of 50km/h with 45 degree front to kerb angle parking on the western side and parallel parking on the eastern side. The road generally has a two-way single lane configuration in each direction. Joseph Street is approximately 5m in width between kerbs and operates as a two-way laneway.

 

 

 

 

DISCUSSION

A letter outlining the above proposal was distributed to the directly affected properties (11 properties) in Ryan Street, Lilyfield. No submissions were received in response to this proposal.

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

The project is listed on Council’s Traffic Facilities Capital Works budget for 2024/2025 and is estimated to be around $21,000.

 

ATTACHMENTS

1.

Ryan Street, Lilyfield (at Joseph Street) - Design Plan

 

 


Local Traffic Committee Meeting

16 September 2024