|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Live Streaming of Council Meeting
In the spirit of open, accessible and transparent government, this meeting of the Inner West Council is being streamed live on Council’s website. By speaking at a Council meeting, members of the public agree to being recorded and must ensure their speech to the Council is respectful and use appropriate language. A person who uses defamatory, discriminatory or offensive language may be exposed to liability for which Council takes no responsibility. Any part of this meeting that is held in closed session will not be recorded.
Council meetings are streamed live on Council’s website. This allows our community greater access to Council proceedings, decisions and debate.
Pre-Registration to Speak at Council Meetings
Members of the public must register by 2pm of the day of the Meeting to speak at Council Meetings. If you wish to register to speak please fill in a Register to Speak Form, available from the Inner West Council website, including:
Are there any rules for speaking at a Council Meeting?
The following rules apply when addressing a Council meeting:
What happens after I submit the form?
You will be contacted by Governance Staff to confirm your registration. If you indicated that you will speak online, you will be provided with a link to the online meeting. Your request will then be added to a list that is shown to the Chairperson on the night of the meeting.
Where Items are deferred, Council reserves the right to defer speakers until that Item is heard on the next occasion.
Accessibility
Inner West Council is committed to ensuring people with a disability have equal opportunity to take part in Council and Committee Meetings. At the Council Chambers at Ashfield, there is a hearing loop service available to assist persons with a hearing impairment. If you have any other access or disability related participation needs and wish to know more, call 9392 5536.
Persons in the public gallery are advised that under the Local Government Act 1993, a person may NOT record a Council meeting without the permission of Council.
Any persons found recording without authority will be expelled from the meeting.
“Record” includes the use of any form of audio, video and still camera equipment or mobile phone capable of recording speech.
An audio recording of this meeting will be taken for the purpose of verifying the accuracy of the minutes.
Statement of Ethical Obligations
The Mayor and Councillors are bound by the Oath/ Affirmation of Office made at the start of the Council term to undertake their civic duties in the best interests of the people of the Inner West Council and to faithfully and impartially carry out the functions, powers, authorities and discretions vested in them under the Local Government Act or any other Act, to the best of their skill and judgement.
It is also a requirement that the Mayor and Councillors disclose conflicts of interest in relation to items listed for consideration on the Agenda or which are considered at this meeting in accordance with Council’s Code of Conduct and Code of Meeting Practice.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
AGENDA |
Volume 1 of 2
1 Acknowledgement of Country
2 Apologies and Request for Remote Attendance
3 Notice of Webcasting
4 Statement of Ethical Obligations
5 Disclosures of Interest (Part 4 (Pecuniary Interests) and Part 5 (non-pecuniary conflicts of interest) of Council’s Code of Conduct)
6 Moment
of Quiet Contemplation
7 Confirmation of Minutes Page
Minutes
of 18 February 2025 Council 7
8 Public Forum – Hearing from All Registered Speakers
9 Condolence Motions
Nil at the time of printing.
10 Mayoral Minutes
Nil at the time of printing.
11 Reports for Council Decision
ITEM Page
C0325(1) Item 1 Lighting Trial on Sporting Grounds 48
C0325(1) Item 2 Centenary Reserve - All Weather Sporting Surface Development 62
C0325(1) Item 3 11-11A Edinburgh Road, Marrickville Planning Proposal 66
C0325(1) Item 4 Season extension Fanny Durack Aquatic Centre 490
C0325(1) Item 5 Bins and Cleaner Streets 492
C0325(1) Item 6 Two All-Weather Fields in Callan Park Update 499
C0325(1) Item 7 Expression of Interest process for the use of the basement within Marrickville Town Hall 507
C0325(1) Item 8 Early Childhood Education Waitlist Fee 510
C0325(1) Item 9 Local Traffic Committee Meeting- 17 February 2025 512
C0325(1) Item 10 Post Exhibition - Proposal for an off Leash Area for Companion Animals at Steel Park 533
C0325(1) Item 11 Public Exhibition - Draft Compliance and Enforcement Policy 541
C0325(1) Item 12 Public Exhibition - Code of Conduct 561
Volume 2 of 2
12 Reports for Noting
ITEM Page
C0325(1) Item 13 Councillor Expenses for 1 July 2024 to 31 December 2024 617
C0325(1) Item 14 Open space opportunities along rail corridors 619
C0325(1) Item 15 Draft Promotional Plan for the Inner West Sustainability Hub 2025 624
C0325(1) Item 16 Review of Opportunities for EV Public Charging in Tempe Reserve and Balmain Depot 634
C0325(1) Item 17 Mandatory Reporting to Council of Report received from Fire & Rescue NSW - 1 Brown Street Ashfield 638
C0325(1) Item 18 Boarding House - Grant Opportunities 645
C0325(1) Item 19 Love Your Club Update 647
C0325(1) Item 20 Leichhardt Oval Refurbishment Update 649
C0325(1) Item 21 Petersham Town Hall Creative Hub EOI 652
13 Notices of Motion
ITEM Page
C0325(1) Item 22 Notice of Motion: Paying tribute to local leaders 655
C0325(1) Item 23 Notice of Motion: Pedestrian Safety improvements between Glover Street and Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre 659
C0325(1) Item 24 Notice of Motion: Improving Traffic Safety Murrell Street, Ashfield 663
C0325(1) Item 25 Notice of Motion: Community Engagement Process for Public Domain Impacts 674
C0325(1) Item 26 Notice of Motion: Murrell Street, Ashfield Traffic Safety Review 675
C0325(1) Item 27 Notice of Motion: Dedicated Reflection Area at Johnson Park 677
C0325(1) Item 28 Notice of Motion: Communication Board Installation in a Local Park in the Ashfield-Djarrawunang ward 678
C0325(1) Item 29 Notice of Motion: Inner West e-Bike Strategy and shared e-Bike provider round table. 680
C0325(1) Item 30 Notice of Motion: Booth Street Connection for White Bay Cruise Ship Terminal Tourist Path and Active Transport. 681
C0325(1) Item 31 Notice of Motion: Perfect Match Business Facade Improvement Program 683
C0325(1) Item 32 Notice of Motion: McNeilly Park Public Toilets 685
C0325(1) Item 33 Notice of Motion: Jarvie Park Public Toilets 686
C0325(1) Item 34 Notice of Motion: Council engagement with Homes NSW on waste management 687
C0325(1) Item 35 Notice of Motion: Improved waste management practices in future planning 688
C0325(1) Item 36 Notice of Motion: Pedestrian crossing on Liberty Street, Stanmore 689
C0325(1) Item 37 Notice of Motion: A Community Battery for the Inner West 693
C0325(1) Item 38 Notice of Motion: Railway Avenue, Stanmore - Traffic Accident Report 694
C0325(1) Item 39 Notice of Motion: Shaw Street, Petersham – Proposed Pedestrian Crossing 695
C0325(1) Item 40 Notice of Motion: Flood improvement plan for Evan Jones Playground and Whites Creek Lane, Leichhardt 697
C0325(1) Item 41 Notice of Motion: Rezoning of additional former WestConnex dive sites for mixed residential development 699
14 Questions From Councillors
ITEM Page
C0325(1) Item 42 Question on Notice: White Bay Cruise Ship Terminal Impacts 701
15 Reports with Confidential Information
Reports appearing in this section of the Business Paper contain confidential information in attachments.
The confidential information has been circulated separately.
ITEM Page
C0325(1) Item 43 RFT 32-24 IWC Cleaning Services and Associated Products 702
C0325(1) Item 44 T2024-06 SSROC - Mattress Collection and Processing Tender 704
C0325(1) Item 45 Sydney Gateway Project and Hand Back of Council Leased Land 705
C0325(1) Item 46 Quarterly Strategic Investment Property Report 707
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting held on 18 February 2025
Meeting commenced at 6.30pm
Present: |
|
Darcy Byrne Mat Howard Izabella Antoniou Liz Atkins Olivia Barlow Andrew Blake Jo Carlisle Vicki Clay Jessica D’Arienzo Kerrie Fergusson Victor Macri Vittoria Raciti Philippa Scott Chloe Smith Ismet Tastan Simone Plummer |
Mayor (7:25pm) Deputy Mayor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor General Manager Director Planning |
Ryann Midei |
Director Infrastructure |
Ruth Callaghan Chris Sleiman Julian Sakarai Matthew Pearce Manod Wickramasinghe Scott Mullen Lindsay Field Lachlan Broadbent Helen Bradley Joan Murphy |
Director Community Acting Director Corporate Acting Senior Manager Governance and Risk General Counsel Traffic and Transport Planning Manager Strategic Investments and Property Manager Public Trees Manager Senior Manager Operations Resource Recovery Planning Manager Acting Senior Manager People and Culture |
Katherine Paixao Darcie Huisman |
Business Paper Coordinator Business Paper Officer |
** The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Howard was chair of the meeting until the Mayor, Councillor Byrne arrived (at 7.25pm).
APOLOGIES AND REQUEST FOR REMOTE PARTICIPATION:
Nil.
DISCLOSURES OF INTEREST:
Councillor Clay declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 43 - Notice of Motion: A public toilet for Weekley Park, as her primary residence is in the vicinity of Weekley Park. She will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter as it is not currently clear where the proposed toilet facilities will be installed.
Councillor Carlisle declared a significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 13 - Local Traffic Committee Meeting - 9 December 2024, as her principal place of residence is in close proximity to one of the streets referred to in the Local Traffic Committee meeting minutes. She will leave the meeting during discussion and voting.
Councillor Raciti declared a significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 8 - Post Exhibition - Revised Sporting Grounds Allocations Policy as her husband is the president of the Leichhardt Tigers and her son is on the board. She will leave the meeting during discussion and voting.
Councillor Raciti declared a significant, pecuniary interest in Item 72 - RFT 44-24 Richard Murden Reserve Inclusive Playground Construction as her primary residence is in close proximity to the reserve. She will leave the meeting during discussion and voting.
Councillor Barlow declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 13 - Local Traffic Committee Meeting - 9 December 2024 as she works in the Office of Kobi Shetty MP, who in her capacity as the member for Balmain, has a representative on the Traffic Committee. She will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter as the vote is exercised through a representative.
Councillor Blake declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 8 - Post Exhibition - Revised Sporting Grounds Allocations Policy as he is a player for Hurlstone Park Men’s Over 35s Football team who are a member of the Canterbury District Football Association and who use sporting fields in the Inner West Council area. He has not been consulted or lobbied on this item and he has no decision making capacity in either organisation and so he will remain in the meeting for discussion and voting.
The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Howard declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 62 - Notice of Motion: Review into Sydenham to Bankstown T3 line closure replacement buses as he has in his previous employment been directly engaged in some work around that matter. As his employment circumstances have changed, this does not represent a significant interest and he will remain in the meeting for discussion and voting.
Councillor D’Arienzo declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 68 - Update on the EOI for the development of affordable housing on Council land as she has commenced new employment in the Office of the Minister for Housing and Homelessness NSW. Out of an abundance of caution and until she receives advice on how to deal with the conflict, she will leave the meeting during voting and discussion.
Councillor Scott declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 8 - Post Exhibition - Revised Sporting Grounds Allocations Policy as her principal place of residence is adjacent to Lambert Park. She will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting.
** Councillor Antoniou made a declaration later in the meeting in relation to Item 23 - SXSW Sydney Update.
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
That the Minutes of the Council held on Tuesday, 3 December 2024 be confirmed as a correct record.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil Absent: Cr Byrne |
PUBLIC FORUM
The registered speakers were asked to address the meeting. The list of speakers is available on the last page of these minutes.
Councillor Scott left the meeting at 6:40pm
The Mayor, Councillor Byrne entered the meeting at 7:25pm. The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Howard, vacated the Chair and the Mayor, Councillor Byrne, assumed the Chair.
Councillor Antoniou left the meeting at 7:26pm
Councillor Scott returned to the meeting at 7:26pm
Councillor Antoniou returned to the meeting at 7:35pm
1. That Council record our sadness at the passing of Rochelle Porteous and writes to the family expressing our condolences.
2. That Council notes the significant contribution Rochelle has made to the Inner West community over a 17 year period as an advocate, councillor and as Mayor and propose an appropriate recognition of her service to the Council and the wider community.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
1. That Council record our sadness at the passing of Catherine Young and writes to the family expressing our condolences.
2. That Council notes the contribution Catherine has made to the Balmain/Rozelle community and propose an appropriate recognition of her service to the community.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
Procedural Motion (Scott/D’Arienzo)
That Council allow Clr Byrne to speak for 2 additional minutes on Item 3.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Procedural Motion (Barlow/Blake)
That Council allow Clr Antoniou to speak for 2 additional minutes on Item 3.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Procedural Motion (Atkins/Antoniou)
That Council allow Clr Barlow to speak for 1 additional minute on Item 3.
Motion Lost
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake and Tastan
Against Motion: Crs Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott and Smith
Procedural Motion (Smith/Fergusson)
That Council allow Clr Byrne to speak for 2 additional minutes on Item 3.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
C0225(1) Item 3
Mayoral Minute: Combating Anti-Semitism and Supporting |
1. That Council condemns the recent surge of antisemitic attacks and vilification directed towards Sydney’s Jewish community, including the attempted firebombing of Newtown Synagogue, harassment of local Jewish residents, and incidents of antisemitic graffiti here in the Inner West.
2. That Council acknowledges that local Jewish leaders have warned for months that antisemitic behaviour has been building in the Inner West, and have called on elected representatives to take a clear stand against antisemitism in all its forms.
3. That Council notes that the intimidation of local Jewish people by protestors at the August 2024 Inner West Council meeting, including the booing and hissing speakers, was overtly antisemitic and unacceptable.
4. That Council acknowledges that racism must be opposed in all its forms and that there has been an increase in other forms of racism in our community, including towards Indigenous Australians during the Voice referendum, and that racism directed at one community has the potential to harm all diverse communities.
5. That Council notes Council’s endorsed position that foreign affairs is not the remit of local government, but that local government has a role in combating racism and supporting community cohesion at the grassroots level.
6. That Council notes the steps already taken by Council to combat antisemitism, racism, and support community cohesion, including the recent Mayoral Roundtable on Social Cohesion that Inner West Council co-hosted, and the recently released Anti-Racism Strategy, the first developed by a local council in NSW.
7. That Council commits to key actions to combat antisemitism, racism, and support community cohesion in the Inner West, including: a) receiving an urgent briefing for all councillors with the local Police Area Command and with Multicultural NSW on how Council can support community safety and cohesion at the local level; b) providing funding and support for projects, programs and capacity building at the community level. The Cultural Connections Program will allocate $50,000 annually in grants to ethnic community organisations to build and strengthen connections with the wider community; c) completing the installation of three Indigenous Survival Memorials across the Inner West to tell the heroic story of survival of First Nations people. The first at Yeo Park in Ashfield was opened in 2024; d) investing $120,000 over the next two years to develop and pilot a customised Anti-Racism Training Program in partnership with Western Sydney University. This will train hundreds of local residents and Council staff so they have practical skills and tools to confidently identify and respond to racist behaviours as a bystander; e) using the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination for ongoing communications campaigns to the whole community to combat specific racist beliefs and behaviours to make Harmony Day more effective and meaningful; and f) employment measures to support greater economic participation for people from diverse backgrounds or Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, including in recruitment and professional development of Council staff and new apprenticeships.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil
Amendment (Antoniou/Atkins)
That point 5 of the motion be deleted, being:
That Council notes Council’s endorsed position that foreign affairs is not the remit of local government, but that local government has a role in combating racism and supporting community cohesion at the grassroots level.
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake and Tastan Against Motion: Crs Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott and Smith
Amendment (Atkins/Blake)
That Council prioritises the review of the Inner West Council’s Anti-Racism strategy review in light of the release of the Human Rights Commission’s National Anti-Racism framework, as part of this review: a) Council staff work with the Multicultural NSW’s Compact Alliance to learn and apply to the review best practices for local councils seeking to support community members at risk of racialised violence; and b) engage the Multicultural Advisory Committee to explore the ways global conflicts manifest locally and recommend ways the Inner West Council can better support our residents.
Motion Lost For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake and Tastan Against Motion: Crs Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott and Smith |
Councillor D'Arienzo left the meeting at 8:50pm
Councillor D'Arienzo returned to the meeting at 8:52pm
Procedural Motion (Howard/Atkins)
That Council Suspend Standing Orders to bring forward the following items to be dealt with at this time:
1. Item 10 Public Exhibition - Draft Community Participation Plan
2. Item 12 Opportunities and Constraints associated with residents seeking to install EV charging infrastructure
3. Item 14 Aboriginal naming of Inclusive Playgrounds
4. Item 15 2025 Inner West Council Grant Program
5. Item 16 Deed of Variation for Planning Agreement - 1-13 Parramatta Road, Annandale
6. Item 20 Investment Report at 30 November 2024
7. Item 21 Investment Report at 31 December 2024
8. Item 22 Investment Report at 31 January 2025
9. Item 24 White Bay Power Station Update
10. Item 31 2024-2025 Annual Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest First Returns for New Councillors, and Updated Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest for returning Councillors
11. Item 35 Notice of Motion: Trans Pride Australia Proposal for Solidarity Crossing/Steps
12. Item 36 Notice of Motion: Early Childhood Education Waitlist Fee
13. Item 38 Notice of Motion: Fire Readiness in Inner West Parks and Reserves
14. Item 39 Notice of Motion: Northcote Street and Area Flooding
15. Item 40 Notice of Motion: Inner West Choral Festival
16. Item 41 Notice of Motion: Stanmore Station Mural
17. Item 42 Notice of Motion: Tackling illegally blocked driveways
18. Item 43 Notice of Motion: A public toilet for Weekley Park
19. Item 44 Notice of Motion: Shared Zone: Wells Street, Annandale
20. Item 45 Notice of Motion: Shared Zone: Myrtle Street, Leichhardt
21. Item 46 Notice of Motion: Right turn arrow corner Foster Street and Marion Street, Leichhardt
22. Item 48 Notice of Motion: Installation of Lockers at Dawn Fraser Baths
23. Item 49 Notice of Motion: Separated Pedestrian/Cycle Lane Robert Street, Balmain
24. Item 54 Notice of Motion: Christmas Decorations
25. Item 55 Notice of Motion: Update to Council's website regarding approval process
26. Item 58 Notice of Motion: Active Transport across the Ashfield - Croydon area - Connecting East West Links
27. Item 59 Notice of Motion: Feel Good Project in the Inner West
28. Item 66 Notice of Motion: Post Development Application Survey
29. Item 70 District Court Settlement
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Procedural Motion (Howard/Atkins)
That the following items be moved in globo and the recommendations contained within the reports be adopted:
1. Item 10 Public Exhibition - Draft Community Participation Plan
2. Item 12 Opportunities and Constraints associated with residents seeking to install EV charging infrastructure
3. Item 14 Aboriginal naming of Inclusive Playgrounds
4. Item 15 2025 Inner West Council Grant Program
5. Item 16 Deed of Variation for Planning Agreement - 1-13 Parramatta Road, Annandale
6. Item 20 Investment Report at 30 November 2024
7. Item 21 Investment Report at 31 December 2024
8. Item 22 Investment Report at 31 January 2025
9. Item 24 White Bay Power Station Update
10. Item 31 2024-2025 Annual Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest First Returns for New Councillors, and Updated Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest for returning Councillors
11. Item 35 Notice of Motion: Trans Pride Australia Proposal for Solidarity Crossing/Steps
12. Item 36 Notice of Motion: Early Childhood Education Waitlist Fee
13. Item 38 Notice of Motion: Fire Readiness in Inner West Parks and Reserves
14. Item 39 Notice of Motion: Northcote Street and Area Flooding
15. Item 40 Notice of Motion: Inner West Choral Festival
16. Item 41 Notice of Motion: Stanmore Station Mural
17. Item 42 Notice of Motion: Tackling illegally blocked driveways
18. Item 43 Notice of Motion: A public toilet for Weekley Park
19. Item 44 Notice of Motion: Shared Zone: Wells Street, Annandale
20. Item 45 Notice of Motion: Shared Zone: Myrtle Street, Leichhardt
21. Item 46 Notice of Motion: Right turn arrow corner Foster Street and Marion Street, Leichhardt
22. Item 48 Notice of Motion: Installation of Lockers at Dawn Fraser Baths
23. Item 49 Notice of Motion: Separated Pedestrian/Cycle Lane Robert Street, Balmain
24. Item 54 Notice of Motion: Christmas Decorations
25. Item 55 Notice of Motion: Update to Council's website regarding approval process
26. Item 58 Notice of Motion: Active Transport across the Ashfield - Croydon area - Connecting East West Links
27. Item 59 Notice of Motion: Feel Good Project in the Inner West
28. Item 66 Notice of Motion: Post Development Application Survey
29. Item 70 District Court Settlement
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
1. That Council adopt the proposed Aboriginal names for the five Inclusive Playgrounds
2. That Council confirm the names of Richard Murden Reserve, Haberfield and Steel Park, South Marrickville
3. That Council refer the adopted and confirmed playground and park names to the Geographic Names Board of NSW for consideration, approval, and gazettal.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
That Council approve the creation of two new grant streams, using existing budgets and as outlined in this report.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
That Council receive and note the report.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
That Council receive and note the report.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
That Council receive and note the report.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
That Council receive and note the report.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
1. That Council note the significant work undertaken to improve accessibility and safety at Stanmore Station delivered as part of the Transport Access Program.
2. That Council note the Stanmore community’s strong support for a mural artwork on the Trafalgar Street-side wall to reduce graffiti vandalism and improve public amenity as part of the upgrade.
3. That Council note that Council’s own award-winning Perfect Match program has demonstrated the positive impact of street artwork in reducing graffiti vandalism and improving amenity, including at Mina’s Cafe located directly opposite the station on Trafalgar Street.
4. That Council write to the Minister for Heritage and the interim Minister for Transport expressing disappointment at the decision not to proceed with the mural artwork on heritage and maintenance grounds, and request a review of the decision including: a) redesigning the artwork to better accommodate heritage concerns; and b) exploring alternate installations to reduce graffiti vandalism, including planting vegetation along the wall to reduce access.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
C0225(1) Item 43 Notice of Motion: A public toilet for Weekley Park |
1. That Council commit to reinstating public toilet facilities in Weekley Park, Stanmore.
2. That Council prepare a report on costs and timeline for installation in this current term of council by the May Council Meeting.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
1. That Council bring back a report on the opportunity to expand the existing festive decorations across the Inner West Local Government Area, in a timeframe that provides for decorations to be sourced and delivered.
2. That the report include a Christmas Decoration Action Plan that invests in new decorations for Inner West shopping districts for 2025 and beyond.
3. That consideration is given to creating a festive streetscape (such as decorations on light posts, fairy lights, Christmas tree).
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
That Council accept the Settlement Offer of $160,000 together with the other terms articulated in the Confidential Legal Advice, as outlined in Attachment 3 of the Confidential Council report.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
Councillor Raciti left the meeting at 9:01pm
Procedural Motion (Scott/Carlisle)
That Council allow Clr Byrne to speak for 2 additional minutes on Item 5.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D’Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Absent: Cr Raciti
Councillor Raciti returned to the meeting at 9:01pm
Councillor Raciti left the meeting at 9:10pm
Councillor Raciti returned to the meeting at 9:13pm
Procedural Motion (Byrne/Howard)
That the meeting be adjourned for 10 minutes.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
The meeting was adjourned at 9.15pm
The meeting recommenced at 9.26pm
Procedural Motion: (Byrne/Carlisle)
That Council Suspend Standing Orders to bring forward Item 50 - Notice of Motion: Access to Council swimming facilities for State Emergency Services training, to be dealt with at this time.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Procedural Motion (Byrne/D’Arienzo)
That Council allow Clr Carlisle to speak for 1 additional minute on Item 50.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
C0225(1) Item 11 Public Exhibition - Urban Forest Policy |
1. That Council publicly exhibit the draft Urban Forest Policy for a period of 28 days and seek community feedback on the proposed Policy.
2. That following the conclusion of the exhibition period, the draft Urban Forest Policy be brought back to Council for consideration for adoption.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
Councillor Carlisle left the meeting at 9:33pm as she had declared a significant, non-pecuniary interest as her principal place of residence is in close proximity to one of the streets referred to in the Local Traffic Committee meeting minutes.
C0225(1) Item 13 Local Traffic Committee Meeting - 9 December 2024 |
1. That Council receive and adopt the recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee meeting held on 9 December 2024; with the following amendments: a) Item 4: Re-exhibition of proposed permanent road closure Jaggers Lane, Balmain - Approve permanent full road closure of Jaggers Lane, between Caroline and Duncan Street (option 1); and b) Item 18: Resident parking scheme Croydon - conduct a post-implementation review of the resident parking scheme in Croydon after six months, and give specific consideration to including Edwin Street (North), between Anthony Street to dead end and Edwin Street (North), between Elizabeth Street and Anthony Street in the Resident Parking Scheme.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Crs Macri and Raciti Absent: Cr Carlisle
Amendment (Macri/Raciti)
That Council receive and adopt the recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee meeting held on 9 December 2024.
Motion Lost For Motion: Crs Macri and Raciti Against Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Scott, Smith and Tastan Absent: Cr Carlisle |
Councillor Carlisle returned to the meeting at 9:43pm
Councillor Macri left the meeting at 9:43pm
1. That Council endorse a trial of door-knocking for five projects, one in each ward: a) Balmain and Leichhardt Wards: Leichhardt Oval and LPAC upgrades b) Marrickville Ward: Henson Park c) Ashfield Ward: Greenway opening d) Stanmore Ward: Lewisham Town Centre Upgrade
2. That the cost form part of budget considerations for 2025/26.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil Absent: Cr Macri |
Councillor Macri returned to the meeting at 9:47pm
Procedural Motion (Byrne/Carlisle)
That Council allow Clr Howard to speak for an additional 30 seconds on Item 19
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST:
Councillor Antoniou declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 23 - SXSW Sydney Update as her extended family have ties to one of the businesses mentioned in the Primary Motion as per point 2. Out of an abundance of caution, she left the meeting during discussion and voting at 9.54pm.
1. That Council note the success of Fest by Inner West in supporting local musicians and creative venues, and in promoting the Enmore Road Special Entertainment Precinct and the Inner West broadly as the premier entertainment and arts precinct in Sydney.
2. That Council commence discussions with SXSW Sydney, Century Venues, and the Newtown Enmore Business Chamber about hosting Fest by Inner West in 2025, including incorporating learnings from the 2024 event.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil Absent: Cr Antoniou |
Councillor Antoniou returned to the meeting at 9:55pm
That Council bring forward the finalisation of the concept design program and concept plans by Cox Architecture to the April 2025 Council meeting.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
Procedural Motion (Byrne/Howard)
That Council allow Clr Smith to speak for 1 additional minute on Item 29.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
1. That Council receive and note the report.
2. That, as part of the marketing strategy, Council provide information and promotional material to the Inner West Creative Network for the Creative Town Halls program for distribution amongst their membership.
3. That Council receive a report by the April 2025 Council meeting, investigating opportunities to maximise community use and engagement of community venues and their efficient management, including examining how different councils manage similar venues, staff resourcing and expertise, and potential partnerships with external organisations and other levels of government.
4. That Council adds to its website and social media channels, information about events at the Town Halls.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
Councillor Macri left the meeting at 10:16pm
Councillor Macri returned to the meeting at 10:19pm
Councillor Raciti left the meeting at 10:20pm
C0225(1) Item 52 Notice of Motion: Domestic Violence hubs |
1. That Council acknowledges: a) the devastating impact of domestic and family violence on our community; b) Council's ongoing commitment to preventing domestic violence and supporting victim-survivors through initiatives including workplace policies, community education, and participating in the 16 Days of Activism; and c) the establishment of the Love and Hope Hub model at Burwood Library to provide accessible, coordinated support services for victim-survivors.
2. That Council notes that: a) victim-survivors often face barriers accessing fragmented support services while dealing with trauma and crisis; b) co-located service hubs provide a safe, accessible way for victim-survivors to connect with multiple support services in one location; and c) local libraries and community centres can serve as non-stigmatising venues for accessing domestic violence support.
3. That Council resolves to: a) investigate establishing regular domestic violence support hubs at suitable Council venues, based on the Love and Hope Hub model; b) explore partnerships with relevant services including: i. Domestic violence support organizations; ii. Legal Aid NSW; iii. NSW Police; iv. Women's health services; v. Housing support services; vi. Multicultural support services; and vii. Settlement services c) consider funding implications in the 2024-25 Operational Plan; d) identify appropriate Council venues that could safely and discreetly host support hubs; e) examine staff training needs to support this initiative; and f) provide a report back to Council within 4 months outlining: i. proposed locations and frequency for support hubs; ii. potential service delivery partners; iii. resource implications and funding options; iv. implementation timeline; and v. measures to ensure cultural safety and accessibility.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil Absent: Cr Raciti |
C0225(1) Item 53 Notice of Motion: Vacant site 26- 36 Enmore Road |
Councillor Raciti returned to the meeting at 10:25pm
1. That Council note operating and delivering high quality, accessible pools and aquatic services is a core community service and: a) as the effects of climate change intensify over the coming years and decades, access to swimming facilities will become increasingly important from a community health and wellbeing perspective; and b) the current cost-of-living crisis may be a prohibitive barrier for many in our community wanting to access and use our swimming facilities.
2. That Council officers bring a report to a future Council meeting including recommendations and budget parameters for running a trial providing free pool entry at Inner West Council Aquatic Centres and pools during the summer, with the days to be determined by Council staff in accordance with operational requirements. This may include but is not limited to days where temperatures are expected to be +33°C.
Motion Lost For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake and Tastan Against Motion: Crs Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott and Smith |
C0225(1) Item 64 Notice
of Motion: Supporting a safe, supportive and anti-racist |
1. That Council introduce the role of City Architect to oversee and lead and guide architectural and urban design initiatives within the council, ensuring alignment with Council’s vision for sustainable, inclusive, and well-designed built environments.
2. That Council include the creation of the City Architect position in the 2025/26 Budget with the position to sit within the Planning Directorate under the Director of Planning.
3. That Council develop a job description and recruitment strategy for the City Architect, ensuring the role is filled by a highly experienced and qualified professional with a deep understanding of urban design, public policy, and community engagement. A report on the proposed responsibilities for the position is to be tabled at the April 2025 Ordinary Council meeting. Key responsibilities are to include: a) lead and advise on the design and planning of public spaces, parks, streetscapes, and civic buildings; b) collaborate with proponents, architects, and urban planners to ensure high quality architectural results across the Inner West; c) champion sustainability and high-quality architecture in all developments. d) create design guidelines that preserve the inner west character while promoting innovative solutions; and e) engage with the community to incorporate local needs into urban design decisions.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
Procedural Motion (Howard/Scott)
That Council enter into Confidential Session.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Councillor D'Arienzo left the meeting at 10:44pm as she had declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 68, as she has commenced new employment in the Office of the Minister for Housing and Homelessness NSW.
Confidential Session
That in accordance with Section 10A(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, the following matters be considered in Closed Session of Council for the reasons provided:
C0225(1) Item 68 Update on The EOI for the Development of Affordable Housing on Council Land (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
C0225(1) Item 69 Appointment of Independent Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee (ARIC) Members, Minutes and Aric Annual Report (Section 10A(2)(a) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains personnel matters concerning particular individuals (other than councillors).
C0225(1) Item 71 RFT 32-24 IWC Cleaning Services and Associated Products (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
C0225(1) Item 72 RFT 44-24 Richard Murden Reserve Inclusive Playground Construction (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
C0225(1) Item 73 Henson Park Upgrade Stage 2 (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
resolutions passed during closed session
Councillor D'Arienzo returned to the meeting at 10.55pm
Procedural Motion (Scott/Howard)
That the meeting be extended to 11.10pm.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Councillor Raciti left the meeting at 11:00pm she had declared a significant, pecuniary interest in Item 72, as her primary residence is in close proximity to the reserve.
Councillor Raciti returned to the meeting at 11:02pm
1. That Council note the $2M funding contribution from the AFL towards the Henson Park Stage 2 Upgrade.
2. That Council commit a financial contribution of $5.5M towards the Henson Park Stage 2 Upgrade as part of the 2025/26 budget, drawing on funds from the following sources: a) developer contributions previously from nearby developments including at the former Timber Yards site; b) funding owed by Sydney Airport Corporation to Council; and c) infrastructure Reserves.
3. That Council advise the Office of Local Government on the changes to the funding package for Stage 2 in accordance with Public Private Partnership guidelines.
4. That Council delegate authority to the General Manager to enter into agreements or similar regarding the delivery of Stage 2 of the Henson Park upgrade.
5. That the approved designed and costings be circulated to councillors and a briefing session be held.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
Procedural Motion (Scott/Carlisle)
That the meeting be extended to 11.30pm.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
That Council proceed with the proposed new organisational structure of five Directors and General Counsel reporting to the General Manager as outlined below:
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
Procedural Motion (Byrne/Scott)
That Council move back into the Open Session of the Council Meeting.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Meeting closed at 11.22pm.
Public Speakers:
Item #
|
Speaker |
Suburb |
Item 3: |
Campbell Knox Jesse McNicoll Richard Gray Uri Windt Rabbi Eli Feldman |
Ashfield Glebe St Peters Annandale Newtown |
Item 5: |
Will Atkins Rebecca Fernandez Neil Tonkin Paul Avery Terence Kelly |
Balmain East Balmain Lilyfield Balmain Newington |
Item 12: |
Rod Walker |
Williamstown |
Item 13: |
Edward Walsh Rory Steinle-Davies David Lethem Bob Stephenson Hugh Davies |
Balmain Birchgrove Balmain Balmain Balmain |
Item 47: |
Greg Pattison Heleana Genaus |
Balmain Annandale |
Item 50: |
Larissa Brisbane Rachel Bunder |
Ashfield Ashfield |
Item 55: |
Robert Pringle Julie Tubby |
Rozelle Rozelle |
Item 56: |
Trista Rose |
Balmain |
Item 58: |
Donald Semken |
Ashfield |
Item 64: |
Campbell Knox Jesse McNicoll |
Ashfield Glebe |
Item 65: |
Heleana Genaus |
Annandale |
Item 68: |
Morris Hanna Arthur Alepidis Simon Konstantinidis |
Marrickville Beverly Hills Marrickville |
Unconfirmed minutes from the Ordinary Council meeting held on 18 February 2025.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Lighting Trial on Sporting Grounds
Prepared By: Aaron Callaghan - Parks Planning and Ecology Manager
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council retain the following winter hours for sporting ground flood lighting use in order to facilitate dog walking after dark in winter: a) Mondays reduced lighting until 7.30pm; b) Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays and Fridays 5pm-9pm; and c) Saturdays and Sundays – no lighting except: i. 5pm-10pm on all-weather synthetic surfaces subject to Council approval; and ii. on natural turf grounds for finals series games or one-off events subject to approval by Council.
2. That Council continue to undertake detailed placemaking in park master plans and park upgrades, to ensure safety by design considerations are embedded in park master plans including the provision of lighting to Australian Standards on pathways, identified hotspots and key pedestrian routes.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report outlines the outcomes of community engagement which was undertaken between June - October 2024 in relation to a sporting ground lighting trial. The report highlights patronage numbers utilising the sporting grounds during the trial period and feedback received from community members and community-based sporting clubs.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 4 June 2024, Council resolved the following in part:
3. That Council commit to extended hours for lighting at all council-managed sports grounds during winter months, allowing lights to remain on until at least 9:00pm between June 1 and October 1 annually, subject to a trial period of two months, during which Council will write to residents and signage will be erected at each ground informing users of the trial and providing an avenue to provide feedback, with a report to be tabled following the trial including feedback from park users.
DISCUSSION
The lighting trial operated from 1 June 2024 through 1 October 2024 from 5pm-9:15pm on the following sporting grounds:
1. Algie Park
2. Arlington Recreation Reserve
3. Ashfield Park
4. Balmain Road (Callan Park)
5. Birchgrove Oval
6. Blackmore Park
7. Camperdown Oval
8. Centenary Park
9. Cohen Park
10. Easton Park
11. Glover Street (Callan Park)
12. Hammond Park
13. HJ Mahoney Reserve
14. King George Park
15. Leichhardt #2
16. Leichhardt #3
17. Mackey Park
18. Marrickville Park
19. Petersham Park
20. Pratten Park
21. Steel Park
22. Tempe Reserve
23. Waterfront Drive (Callan Park)
Community Sports and Lighting of Sporting Grounds
In terms of regular winter sporting use, sporting ground lighting has been programmed to be switched on from 5pm through to 9:15pm on the above listed sporting grounds for seasonal sports training on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays and Fridays. Previously to the lighting trial, and in line with Council’s adopted Sporting Ground Allocations Policy on Monday evenings, all sports grounds were previously closed for rest and recovery and also to provide residential respite from weekend winter sport. This policy requirement was placed on hold during the trial period.
Community Engagement Outcomes
Community feedback on the lighting trial was advertised via letter drop to local residents and through A1 posters in the parks listed. Formal community feedback on the lighting trial was open from the 25 June 2024 until 31 August 2024.
A total of 884 people visited the Your Say project page, a total of 99 visitors provided feedback through the online survey and 15 provided feedback via email. A total of 74% of respondents of the online survey completely agreed with the proposal. The main reasons for supporting lighting provision in parks was the ability to exercise at night, increasing safety and being able to walk dogs at night. Of the 15 email respondents, 60% were against the proposal citing concerns with light and noise pollution for local residents and biodiversity, along with energy consumption and parking issues. A copy of the engagement summary report is included at Attachment 1 to this report.
During the engagement process a number of individual submissions were also received by Council officers during the lighting trial. A full summary of these emailed submissions is provided as an Attachment 2 to this report. In summary, the majority of written submissions, coming from both residents and sporting clubs opposed the lighting trial and highlighted the following concerns:
· Increased energy costs to ratepayers
· Light pollution
· Residential amenity impacts
· Overuse of sporting grounds
· Wildlife and biodiversity impacts.
· Antisocial behaviour in parks after dark
Submissions in support of the lighting trial highlighted support for the following:
· Additional training access outside of community sporting training times.
· Lighting should be extended to all playground areas
· Improved safety for park users and enhanced community connection
Young Leaders Workshop
As part of the Community engagement process, Council representatives attended the Young Leaders Working Group meeting on 5 August 2024 to discuss the lighting trial and seek feedback from young people.
The following recommendations were provided at the Young Leaders Workshop:
1. Consider turning off the lights on the weekend evenings as people have the whole day to utilise the parks (vs during the week when at school/work)
2. Lock the public toilets in the evenings, for safety of the community as instances where dangerous materials found on bathroom floor
3. Skate parks having lights on is a good thing
Amenity impact on nearby residents
Residents who expressed concern about the lighting trial cited amenity impacts around light spill as well as noise associated with the additional lighting. Residents asked for respite by way of some nights of the week having no lights or shortened hours. In consideration of these concerns and in keeping with the recommendations of the Young Leaders Workshop it is recommended that no lights are proposed for weekend nights unless associated with a formal sporting game, and that on Monday nights, when no games are played the lights are turned off early at 7.30pm.
Overuse of Sporting Grounds-Maintaining a Safe Playing Surface
Overuse of sporting grounds was a key issued raised by sporting clubs. They were concerned regarding the impact of dogs on the turf and that the extended lighting attracted informal community that creates further wear and tear on the turf.
Council’s current sporting grounds are oversubscribed in terms of winter use with sporting grounds being used for training and games in excess of 34 hours a week. The recommended national standard for sporting ground use, in terms of maintaining good turf coverage is 24 hours per week of use. The over subscription of use, combined with adverse winter weather conditions and other approved sporting ground uses (including companion animal off leash access- when there is no sporting use), is being overcome to a degree through significant investment in increased maintenance regimes. Alternative technologies including all weather synthetic surfaces to address growing sports training and competition needs also forms part of a multi strategy solution.
Energy Costs - Lighting Trial
Energy costs associated with running the lighting trial from 1 June to 1 October during non-sporting allocation use cost Council a total of $62,300 of additional expenditure.
Community Access Data - Light Trial Sporting Ground Inspections.
Council officers undertook random inspections of sporting grounds during the lighting trial. The inspections recorded visitor numbers during peak access times. As highlighted in Table 1 below, visitor numbers and usage were low. Regular operational inspections of the sporting grounds concur with the low usage numbers and highlighted that there was no noticeable adverse deterioration in ground conditions during the lighting trial period.
Lighting Improvements in Parks
As part of its commitment to park master plans and through its park plans of management process, Council is continuing to develop park master plans for improved lighting in parks. This provides a benefit to the local community and as this improved park lighting continues to be rolled out it offers the opportunity for additional lighting in nearby sporting fields to be reduced.
Currently, major lighting upgrades are being completed in Henson Park to support evening winter access by dog walkers and similar upgrades are also being completed at Camdenville Park. Council has also previously upgraded lighting as part of its Parksafe program at Camperdown Memorial Rest Park.
As major lighting upgrades are completed off field – as has happened at Henson Park, on field lighting will only occur as required to support sporting stakeholder allocations.
Conclusion
The lighting trial was well supported as demonstrated by the Community Engagement documentation. Sporting clubs raised concerns about degradation of the field but this was not demonstrated by the trial. Nearby residents pointed out the ongoing impact to them regarding light spill in particular and accordingly the winter lighting of sporting fields is recommended to become permanent with early lights off on Monday (7.30pm) and no lighting on weekends unless associated with a formal sports game.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The energy costs associated with running the lighting trial from 1 June to 1 October 2024 outside of normal sports training hours (Saturday, Sundays and Mondays) resulted in an unbudgeted cost implication of $62,300.
Attachment 1 has been published separately in the Attachments Document on Council’s Website https://www.innerwest.nsw.gov.au/about/the-council/council-meetings/current-council-meetings
1.⇨ |
Engagement Outcomes Report – Published Separately on Council’s website |
2.⇩ |
Emailed Submissions to Lighting Trial |
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Centenary Reserve - All Weather Sporting Surface Development
Prepared By: Aaron Callaghan - Parks Planning and Ecology Manager
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
RECOMMENDATION
a) maintain and renovate current natural turf sporting ground surfaces; b) provision of one All-weather surface at Centenary Reserve, with cricket displaced from the parkland; and c) provision of two All-weather surfaces at Centenary Reserve with the inclusion of a synthetic cricket wicket.
2. That following the conclusion of the exhibition period, the outcomes of community engagement be brought back to Council. The report will also include details on a recommended project, including updated costings and delivery timelines.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport
4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report highlights a proposed engagement framework for consulting the community in relation to the development of two all-weather surfaces at Centenary Reserve, Ashfield. Importantly, the report highlights the estimated cost implications associated with the project moving forward.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 21 November 2023, Council resolved the following:
That Council begin investigating provision of improved accessibility and an all-weather surface in Centenary Park, Croydon. This process should be conducted in consultation with park users and the community.
DISCUSSION
In April 2024, Council officers from the Parks Planning and Ecology team, along with staff members from Parks Capital held initial engagement with the stakeholders from Ashfield Cricket Club, Burwood Soccer and Super Six-A-Side Soccer (commercial summer user).
In terms of local sporting user feedback:
Ashfield Cricket Club:
· Expressed concerns about the potential health and environmental impacts of all-weather surfaces and concerns about a possible increase in injuries on all-weather surfaces
· The club is experiencing growth in both juniors and seniors registrations
· Losing a cricket wicket would adversely affect the club and games, especially for juniors. There is no alternative venue to relocate Ashfield cricket in the local area
Soccer Sixes:
· Supports the creation of an all-weather surface at the park
· Prefers two synthetic fields
· Believes that injuries will decrease due to the evenness of the playing surface
· Notes that the park has traditionally been used for sports and should continue to be
Burwood Football Club:
· Supports the creation of an all-weather surface at the park
· Requires at least one all-weather field, with a preference for two
· Notes significant loss of playing time due to rain, affecting approximately 30% of training activities are lost every season
· Highlights the disadvantage of not having such facilities compared to other clubs with all-weather synthetic fields, which can play more games and hold more training session
· Points out that increased capacity would enable more community programming, including an all-abilities program and other inclusive activities
Other items:
· Parking is not currently a significant issue, but improvements, such as angle parking on surrounding streets, would be welcome
· A lighting upgrade should be included in the works
· An upgrade to perimeter fencing should be included
· Cricket Nets should be reoriented if possible
· The height of Cricket Nets should be increased if possible
· Additional line markings for multi-sport use, potentially including a jogging track around the oval, should be considered
Table 1 Centenary Reserve - Options for An All-Weather Surface Development
Option |
Positives |
Negatives |
Option 1- Maintain and renovate current natural turf Surfaces |
Budget estimates are approximately $2 million for a complete upgrade including lighting. Works are already included in the forward capital works programme for 2026/2027
Maintains current sporting content for summer and winter use.
Maintains a traditional parkland appearance and community use.
|
Does not address increased capacity needs for local soccer or the loss of playing time due to adverse weather. |
Option 2 - Provision of One Single All Weather Synthetic Surface |
Budget Implications are lower for a single synthetic surface at a construction cost of $4 Million
60% of the parkland is retained as natural turf
|
Cricket is displaced from the parklands as Cricket cannot play on half-synthetic, half- natural turf field. There are no other suitably sized playing fields in the area to support cricket relocation and Ashfield Cricket would need to relocate to a neighbouring LGA
|
Option 3 - Provision of two All Weather Synthetic Surfaces |
Cricket is retained and there is no displacement of existing sports as a synthetic cricket wicket can be placed between the two all-weather sporting fields.
Increased capacity for sporting content for winter soccer and summer six-a-side soccer. |
Natural turf is reduced to 40% percent of the parkland.
$7.5 Million estimated cost to deliver two all-weather surfaces with a synthetic cricket wicket.
|
Cost Implications
The cost implications for renovating and upgrading the existing natural turf surfaces are estimated at $2 Million dollars. This work is currently planned in the forward capital works program for 2026/27.
The capital delivery costs associated with design and delivery of one all-weather surface is estimated at $4 Million.
The capital delivery costs associated with design and delivery of two all-weather surfaces along with a synthetic cricket wicket at Centenary Reserve is valued at approximately $7.5 Million in terms of delivery costs.
In terms of current funding provision, Council’s forward budget allows a total funding of $2,185,000k for upgrades to Centenary Reserve Sporting Grounds. These costings highlight that should Option 3 be preferred a shortfall of approximately $5 Million would result, dependent on the scope for the project. Subject to the outcomes of future community engagement and future Council endorsement of this project, grant opportunities to help fund the project at both State and Federal level would need to be explored and applied for where appropriate.
Options Assessment
In September 2024, an initial assessment on the proposed all weather surface options for the parkland was undertaken along with a preliminary engagement of the sporting stakeholders.
Option 1 – retain the fields as natural turf and upgrade in accordance with Council’s renovation and upgrade schedule. While this option is within budget it does not address issues of accessibility and an all weather surface. Nor does it acknowledge the high demand and wear on sports fields in this area and the low availability of all-weather sports fields generally. Within these constraints however it does accommodate all sporting stakeholders.
Option 2 – provision of one single all-weather surface is an option that is partially accommodated within the current budget allocation for the renovation and upgrade of the existing natural turf. It addresses the high demand for sporting fields on behalf of soccer however this is completely at the expense of local cricket who are traditionally homed at Centenary Park. Cricket requires a larger pitch and the game cannot be played across a part synthetic part natural turf. Implementation of a single synthetic field at Centenary Park effectively removes cricket from the Inner West LGA as there is nowhere else to accommodate this sport.
Option 3 – the creation of two all-weather synthetic soccer fields at Centenary Reserve. This model includes the provision of an artificial cricket wicket between the two sporting fields. This scenario ensures no net loss of sporting content within the parkland. The proposal maintains the openness of the park (no fencing) and approximately 40% of the parkland will be retained as natural turf for general community recreation moving forward. This is the preferred option of stakeholders consulted so far but has budget implications for Council.
Fig 1.0 provides an illustrated image of parkland improvements highlighting the option of two all-weather synthetic surfaces and a synthetic cricket wicket.
Future Community Engagement
Subject to endorsement by Council it is proposed that Council officers undertake community engagement on the proposed redevelopment of the parkland, encompassing all three options and that a further report is brought back to Council on the outcomes of Community Engagement in June 2025 along with final project costing estimates.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: 11-11A Edinburgh Road, Marrickville Planning Proposal
Prepared By: Daniel East - Senior Manager Strategic Planning
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council support the Planning Proposal for 11-11A Edinburgh Road, Marrickville for the reasons recommended in the Council officer’s assessment report (Attachment 1) to permit an additional Floor Space Ratio of 2.25:1 for self-storage units only on the site subject to the following conditions: a) remove the proposed height of building control in line with the Inner West Local Planning Panel’s recommendations. b) amend the proposed site-specific clause to require deep soil planting as per below: i. 7.5% of the site be provided as deep soil/ landscaping if the existing warehouse is largely retained on the site; and ii. 15% of the site be provided as deep soil/ landscaping if more than 25% of the existing warehouse building is removed.
2. That Council forward the Planning Proposal with the above-mentioned changes to the Minister of Planning for Gateway Determination in accordance with section 3.34 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979.
3. That Council following receipt of a Gateway Determination and compliance with its conditions by the proponent, the Planning proposal and supporting documentation be placed on public exhibition for a minimum of 28 days.
4. That Council receive a post exhibition report for its consideration.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
3: Creative communities and a strong economy |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The privately led Planning Proposal for 11-11A Edinburgh Road, Marrickville seeks to amend the Inner West Local Environmental Plan 2022 to provide self-storage uses on the site. The Planning Proposal will facilitate the development of the site for a total of 22,745sqm of floorspace comprising of self-storage units which will serve surrounding businesses and the growing population.
This Planning Proposal and supporting technical studies have been assessed in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act) and relevant guidelines. Subject to changes outlined in this report, the Planning Proposal has demonstrated strategic merit as it is consistent with State and Local Government aspirations relating to retaining and managing industrial land and will support ongoing viability for the industrial lands within the Eastern City District.
The proposal has sufficient strategic and site-specific merit to proceed to the NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure for a Gateway Determination. There are no significant issues that cannot be addressed at the post-exhibition or development application stage.
BACKGROUND
A revised Planning Proposal (Attachment 2) was lodged by Urbis Ltd in November 2024 for 11-11A Edinburgh Road, Marrickville to amend the Inner West Local Environmental Plan 2022 (IWLEP 2022) by:
- allowing additional FSR of 2.25:1 resulting in a total 3.2:1 FSR for self-storage premises only,
- introducing a maximum building height control of 30m, and
- requiring a minimum 7.5% of the site area as deep soil planting.
The Proposal has a long history with Council since its original submission in September 2023. The revised proposal was submitted following concerns raised by officers with the original proposal in relation to urban design and lack of deep soil, tree canopy coverage and urban heat mitigation measures. The proposal has since been updated by the proponent to include a minimum 7.5% of the site area as deep soil planting as an LEP site-specific provision.
The Planning Proposal was referred to the Inner West Local Planning Panel (IWLPP or the Panel) on 17 December 2024. The Panel’s advice is provided as Attachment 12 and discussed below in this report.
Following the Panel’s advice, the Planning Proposal is recommended to be revised further to remove the proposed height control and further enhance opportunities for landscaping from 7.5% to 15% of the site area. Refer to the detailed discussion in the below report.
Site And Surrounding Context
11 and 11A Edinburgh Road, Marrickville form a rectangular shaped lot of approximately 7,127 m2. The site is currently occupied by two 2-storey warehouse buildings with an at-grade loading area that is occupied by National Storage and a single storey building occupied by a smash repairs workshop.
The site has a 94m frontage to Edinburgh Road along the southern boundary, a 94m frontage to Smidmore Street along the northern boundary and a 67m frontage to Murray Street on the western boundary. The eastern boundary of the site abuts 54 Smidmore Street, a vehicle repair station.
The site is zoned E4 - General Industrial and the maximum FSR for the site is 0.95:1 under the IWLEP 2022. There is no height of building development standard for the site.
The site topography varies from approximately RL 4.5m Australian Height Datum (AHD) on the southern and western boundaries of the site and RL 5.7m AHD in the eastern and northern parts of the site.
The site is in a floodplain and parts of the site would be impacted during a 1% Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP) event.
![]() |
The Planning Proposal
This privately led Planning Proposal (Attachment 2) seeks to amend the IWLEP 2022 by introducing the following additional clauses for 11& 11A Edinburgh Road, Marrickville (Lot 1 in DP607677 and Lot 67 in DP4991) in Part 6 to:
· exceed the mapped floor space ratio (existing FSR 0.95:1) by an amount no greater than 2.25:1 if the building is used for self-storage units.
· introduce a maximum building height of 30m (RL34.53)
· provide a minimum of 7.5% of the site area as deep soil planting.
This LEP amendment intends to facilitate the development of the site for a total of 22,745 sqm of floorspace comprising of 7 storeys for self-storage units resulting in an overall FSR of 3.2:1. See Figures 5 – 6 below for the proposed design scheme.
The Planning Proposal also seeks to identify the site on the Key Sites Map (see Figure 4 below) for application of the above site-specific provision.
No changes are proposed to the zoning or permissible land uses.
![]() |
DISCUSSION
Planning Proposal Assessment Summary
The Planning Proposal has been assessed in accordance with Division 3.4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and the Local Environmental Plan Making Guidelines 2022. A summary of the matters for consideration is provided in Table 1. A detailed assessment is provided in the Planning Proposal Assessment Checklist (Attachment 1).
Strategic Merit
The Planning Proposal is consistent with the Metropolis of Three Cities Plan (2018) and the Eastern City District Plan (2018). It also aligns with Council’s Local Strategic Planning Statement (LSPS), Community Strategic Plan and the Employment and Retail Lands Strategy (EaRLS) as discussed below.
It specifically aligns with:
· NSW Government’s Greater Sydney Region Plan and Eastern City District Plan Objective 23 & Priority E12 respectively relating to “Retaining and managing industrial and urban services land”,
· Council’s LSPS Action 9.1 “Preparing LEP provisions to preserve industrial and urban services land and provide additional opportunities to provide urban services”, and
· Council’s EaRLS Action 2.4.1 to “review development standards for land zoned IN1 – General Industrial and IN2 – Light Industrial and consider the potential for increases in or removal of height and/or floor space standards where feasibility studies demonstrate that this is required for redevelopment for industrial purposes”.
Key reasons for this support include:
· The proposed increase in FSR will accommodate additional urban services to support the Harbour CBD and Eastern Economic Corridor. The site is well-positioned within key employment lands located near major logistics hubs around Port Botany, the Sydney CBD and the growing residential population within the Inner West.
· The Proposal will provide key storage facilities which can support the increased residential population and surrounding businesses, as well as last-mile storage for operators within the Inner West and Inner Sydney.
· The Proposal strengthens the viability and protection of industrial land by increasing the density of industrial floorspace and sets a precedent in the area to increase the supply of industrial land to support emerging industries and businesses.
The economic justification (Attachment 8) estimates the demand for self-storage space within the 5km catchment area. Below extract from the Economic Report (p.5):
“Accounting for both existing and proposed facilities, there will continue to be a shortage of self-storage space within the 5km catchment area. From 2022 to 2037, the demand gap for storage area will remain around 33,000 sqm to 91,000 sqm unless additional supply (over and above the proposed facilities) is developed.
The proposed development will help to reduce the shortage of self-storage facilities by adding ~8640 sqm within the catchment area.
Table 1 - Self Storage Demand Gap (Economic Report (Appendix F, Urbis)
Self-Storage Demand Gap (sq.m) |
||||
|
2022 |
2027 |
2032 |
2037 |
Demand |
150,000 |
170,000 |
195,000 |
225,000 |
Supply |
117,438 |
133,809 |
133,809 |
133,809 |
Demand Gap |
32,563 |
36,192 |
61,192 |
91,192 |
Further, the proposal will support business investment in the surrounding area and optimise the use of the current site by intensifying its current use. There is limited industrial land in Inner Sydney, and this will add to the supply.
The Proposal also aligns with relevant Section 9.1 local planning directions and State Environmental Planning Policies as discussed in detail in Attachment 1 and summarised in the below table.
Table 2 – Summary of Strategic Matters for Consideration
Matters for Consideration |
Council Response |
Is the Planning Proposal a result of an endorsed LSPS, strategic study or report? |
The Planning Proposal gives effect to Inner West Council’s EaRLS which sets out principles to ensure the long-term supply of industrial land, more commercial space and identifies distinct areas of business and employment lands. The proposed uplift for self-storage units is relevant to Principle 2 of the EaRLS ‘Industrial and urban services lands are protected and managed’. This intensification aligns with actions to support existing employment clusters and increasing employment floorspace. It also achieves Planning Priority 9 of the Inner West LSPS ‘A thriving local economy’ as this Planning Proposal seeks to preserve and provide additional opportunities to provide urban services. |
Is the Planning Proposal the best means of achieving the objectives or intended outcomes, or is there a better way? |
A Planning Proposal is the appropriate pathway to amend development standards to permit a more intense use of the land for self-storage units. |
Will the Planning Proposal give effect to the objectives and actions of the applicable regional or district plan or strategy (including any exhibited draft plans or strategies)?
|
The Planning Proposal is consistent with the regional and district plans and strategies in regard to supporting employment, industrial lands and by providing services for the growing population in the area. Landscaping and urban heat island is a key matter for consideration as discussed in Table 2.
|
Is the Planning Proposal consistent with a Council LSPS that has been endorsed by the Planning Secretary or GSC, or another endorsed local strategy or strategic plan? |
As above. |
Is the planning proposal consistent with any other applicable State or regional studies or strategies? |
As above. |
Is the Planning Proposal consistent with applicable SEPPs? |
The Planning Proposal is consistent. |
Is the Planning Proposal consistent with applicable Local Planning Directions (Section 9.1 Directions) |
Local Planning Direction 4.1 Flooding – The Planning Proposal is accompanied with a Flood Assessment report (Attachment 6) and satisfies this direction. Council’s Flood Engineers provided further advice which can be addressed at the Development Application stage. Local Planning Direction 4.5 Acid Sulfate Soils – Planning Proposal is accompanied with an Acid Sulfate Soils Assessment (Attachment 7). It deemed that no management plan was required for the site. Further requirements can be addressed at the Development Application stage. |
Is there any likelihood that critical habitat or threatened species, populations or ecological communities, or habitats, will be adversely affected because of the proposals? |
The subject site does not contain any critical habitat or threatened species, populations or ecological communities, or their habitats. |
Are there any other likely environment effects of the planning proposal and how are they proposed to be managed? |
Sydney Airport Obstacle Limitation Surface Level (OLS) – referrals were sent to the relevant State authorities. There was no objection to the Planning Proposal. Built form and scale - See below Table 3 – Site specific matters for built form and scale discussion. Landscaping – See below Table 3 – Site specific matters for deep soil area discussion. Transport and Traffic – The traffic generated by the proposed development will be minimal. The self-storage uses would not require additional parking as the time needed at a self-storage facility is not significant and there are not a high number of workers on site at any given time. |
Has the planning proposal adequately addressed any social and economic effects? |
The Planning Proposal does not have any adverse impacts on heritage items and will have minimal impact to existing social infrastructure given the nature of the proposed uses. Regarding impact on existing retail centres, the proposed development will provide storage and facilitate investment and growth in local businesses. Council has not received any letter of offer to provide public benefits associated with the proposed uplift on this site. It is recommended that the proponent investigate opportunities to provide public benefits as part of a future development application including any potential public art opportunities. |
Is there adequate public infrastructure for the planning proposal? |
This Planning Proposal is not expected to significantly increase demand for infrastructure. The site is in an existing industrial precinct with good access to public transport via Sydenham and St Peters Railway Stations. The Preliminary Traffic Assessment report (Attachment 5) concluded that the site is appropriately serviced with parking and will not significantly impact the surrounding road network. |
What are the views of state and federal public authorities and government agencies consulted in order to inform the Gateway determination? |
The Gateway Determination will advise the full list of public authorities to be consulted as part of the Planning Proposal process and any views will be included in this Planning Proposal following consultation. Pre-lodgement advice was sought from the following agencies: · Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI) · Transport for NSW (TfNSW) · Sydney Metro · Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) · DCCEW Other agencies identified for further consultation are: · Ausgrid · Sydney Water · Sydney Airport Corporation |
Site-Specific Matters
Table 3 – Site specific issues for consideration
Key issues |
Council Response |
Flooding |
The site is located on flood prone land and is identified in the Marrickville DCP 2011 as an overland flow path. Council’s Flood Risk Management Plan identifies a Flood Planning Level (FPL) of 5.83, which is sufficiently raised above the 1% Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP). A Flood Assessment Report (Attachment 6) has been provided by HydroStorm Consulting dated 31 October 2024 which addresses relevant clauses (3)(a)-(h), Council’s Flood Management requirements and the NSW Floodplain Development Manual. The proposed concept plan indicates that most of the new warehouse floorspace is at or above this level, however the existing warehouse level, Edinburgh Road driveway, box shop level and wine storage area on the ground floor are not. Ministerial Direction 4.1(3)(d) states “a planning proposal must not contain provisions that apply to the flood planning area which permit a significant increase in the develop and/or dwelling density of that land.” Whilst the proposal does increase the development potential of a site in a flood planning area, this is considered to be appropriate as flooding impacts can be mitigated through modifications to the design at the development application stage. Attachment 2 outlines the modifications required to the concept plan at the development application stage to address flooding issues. |
Acid Sulfate Soils |
The site is identified as Class 2 Acid Sulfate Soils (ASS) in the IWLEP 2022. An ASS assessment report prepared by Martens Consulting Engineers (Attachment 7) was submitted with the Planning Proposal. The report states that no basement is intended on site and that future works will involve the disturbance of less than 1,000 tonnes of soil material. The assessment also found that on site soils do not meet the definition of Actual acid sulphate soil or Potential acid sulphate soil. Due to this, it finds that the site soils do not require an ASS Management Plan prior to development consent. Further detailed investigation will be undertaken at development application stage when the extent of soil disturbance is fully understood. |
Traffic |
Given that the proposal relates to increasing the FSR for self-storage uses only through a site-specific LEP provision, the potential traffic impacts are minimal. The proposal would result in a slight increase in traffic generation during peak hours and have a negligible impact on the surrounding road network. This is demonstrated in the proponent’s Transport Assessment Report (Attachment 5). Concerns were raised by Council’s Traffic engineers and TfNSW (at the pre-lodgement stage) regarding the potential traffic impacts of other permissible uses under the E4 – General Industrial zone that may result from an increased FSR, namely ‘hardware and building supplies’. Consequently, through the pre-lodgement stage, the Planning Proposal has been modified by the proponent to limit the FSR uplift to the self-storage facility land use only. Further, compliance with the parking controls or any justification to provide reduced parking should be demonstrated at the Development Application stage. |
Urban design |
The proposed bulk and scale of the development up to 30m (7 storeys) raises potential visual and amenity concerns. However given the site’s location and context, the level of impact is not significant and considered acceptable. The site is in an industrial area and not directly adjoining any residential areas, so there are no major concerns regarding overshadowing or visual privacy. Further, the built form could be refined at the Development Application stage by reducing the excessive use of blank walls and including high-quality materials on the building facades. There are also opportunities to include public art on the façades. Further Clause 6.9 of the Inner West LEP 2022 will require the DA to undergo an assessment against design excellence criteria including review by Council’s Architectural Excellence Panel. |
Urban heat |
The site is located in an urban industrial area which is severely affected by urban heat due to lack of tree canopy and deep soil planting. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016), the site is identified to have a Heat Vulnerability Index (HVI) of 4 out of 5 see Figure 7 below. Such areas are deemed to be most vulnerable to the adverse effects of the urban heat island effect. · Figure 7. Heat Vulnerability Index (NSW SEED, 2016) The proposal has been revised since its original submission to provide 7.5% of the site area as deep soil planting along the Murray Street frontage (67.1m). This would result in an area of 534 sqm which can accommodate approximately 6 large trees in a good location that also improves the public domain amenity along Murray Street. The Inner West’s Tree Management DCP has a tree canopy target of 25% for industrial land. The NSW Greener Neighbourhood Guide sets a deep soil target of 15% for the site area of industrial sites. The proposal includes the following justifications for the reduced provision of 7.5% deep soil planting: · The NSW Greener Neighbourhood Guide target of 15% is aspirational. The site currently has no deep soil or tree canopy. · Retaining the existing warehouse on site is crucial to the viability of the project. · Partial removal of the existing warehouse is the only means to achieve deep soil landscaping. Any further demolition of the existing warehouse will require significant structural and NCC related upgrades to the building that will render the project unfeasible. Further, the proponent has explored options to provide 15% deep soil and has demonstrated that any landscaping coverage above 7.5% would not be feasible on the site as it would: · impact the servicing and function of the existing storage facility and viability of the business (proponent intends to retain the existing warehouse building on the site) · require redesign due to the roof structure · impact the building fire safety requirements. · potentially worsen flooding on the site The concept architectural drawings indicate an approximate 534sqm of deep soil area (7.5m x 67.1m) deep soil area located along the Murray Street boundary. The proposed landscaping is located along a frontage that adds value to the public domain and streetscape. Due to the constraints on the site and proponent’s stance for major retention of the existing warehouse, 15% would not be achievable. The proposed deep soil provision is generally considered acceptable in this circumstance as: · Significant consideration has gone into options testing for a range of deep soil outcomes with the proposed arrangement delivering the best outcome. This includes substantial modifications to the proposal since the original 2023 submission which provided zero deep-soil planting. · Contextually, this will be a generous onsite deep soil provision. · If undertaken in line with the concept plan, locating the deep soil continuously along the Murray Street frontage will have a positive contribution to the public domain and allow for the planting of a meaningful tree canopy. · It’s acknowledged that retention of the existing warehouse is preferred urban design outcome and supports the feasibility of the project. · Inclusion of site-specific target of deep soil planting in the LEP will provide certainty regarding the delivery of this deep soil planting and landscaping at the development application stage. · A review of recently approved developments applications for industrial sites throughout Marrickville indicates that new developments are usually providing deep soil below 5% of the site area. The IWLPP have recommended that the proposal should provide 15% deep soil planting in accordance with the Greener Neighbourhoods Guide. While in principle Council officers support increased provision of deep soil planting on this site, and in the wider precinct, it is impractical to achieve the 15% deep soil planting on the site unless the existing warehouse is demolished. Through discussions with the proponent, it has been established that demolishing the existing warehouse has major operational impacts and it would substantially affect the viability of the project.
Consequently, it is recommended that the site-specific provision regarding the provision of deep soil planting be amended in the Planning Proposal to: - provide 7.5% deep soil planting if the existing warehouse is largely retained on the site; or - provide 15% deep soil planting if more than 25% of the existing warehouse building is removed.
This approach allows opportunities for additional deep soil planting in the instance if the existing warehouse is demolished in the future. The current provision of minimum 7.5% deep soil planting and retaining the existing warehouse is also considered acceptable as it would increase the supply of urban services land while maintaining the project to be viable for the proponent. |
Inner West Local Planning Panel Advice
In accordance with Division 2.5 (2.19) of the EP&A Act 1979, the Planning Proposal was referred to the IWLPP on 17 December 2024. The IWLPP resolved that the Planning Proposal should be conditionally supported. See Table 2 below summarising IWLPP’s concerns and Council Officer’s response. IWLPP Meeting Report and Minutes are provided in Attachment 11 and 12. Further, the proponent’s response to the IWLPP advise is provided in Attachment 13.
Table 4: IWLPP Advice and Council Officer’s response
IWLPP Advice |
Council Officer Response |
Concerns FSR will be used for uses other than self-storage facility through State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt & Complying Development Codes) |
It is unlikely that the additional FSR will be used for uses other than self-storage via the Exempt and Complying Development Codes pathway. SEPP (Exempt & Complying Development Codes), Part 1, Division 2 Exempt and complying development would not apply to the site as the site is affected by Acid Sulfate Soils Class 2. As per clause 1.19 Land on which complying development may not be carried out Clause (1)(c), development under certain codes cannot be carried out on land identified on Acid Sulfate Soils Map as being Class 1 or Class 2. Further, the Proponent welcomes the opportunity to work with Council on the drafting of the planning provisions. |
To exclude site from Clause 4.6 |
As per the Local Planning Direction 1.4A, the objective of this direction is to maintain flexibility. At the development application stage, it is highly unlikely that a clause 4.6 would be allowed as the site has been given adequate additional uplift through the planning proposal pathway. |
Against the proposed 30m HOB control |
The Panel’s concerns are understood regarding the potential mismatch of FSR and height control. It is recommended that the proposed height control therefore be removed from the proposal. This is consistent with the existing approach for industrial lands in the LEP where there are no height controls, and the built form is largely governed by the FSR control. |
That the deep soil area should be increased to 15% in line with the NSW Greener Neighbourhood Guide. |
As discussed in Table 3 under Site-Specific Matters - Urban Heat, The Planning Proposal is recommended to be amended to provide 7.5% - 15% deep soil planting depending on the level of alterations proposed to the existing warehouse. |
Conclusion
The Planning Proposal for 11 & 11A Edinburgh Road, Marrickville has been assessed in accordance with the EP&A Act and relevant LEP Making guidelines. The Planning Proposal is generally consistent with regional, district and local plans and policies and will increase the supply of urban services land in the Inner West. Subject to the following changes, the Planning Proposal is recommended to be supported:
- Remove the proposed height control to avoid any mismatch of FSR and height controls
- Amend the site-specific provision regarding deep soil planting to provide:
o 7.5% of the site area as deep soil planting if the existing warehouse is largely retained on the site; or
o 15% of the site area as deep soil planting if more than 25% of the existing warehouse building is removed.
The Planning Proposal with the above-mentioned changes has sufficient strategic and site-specific merit. It is therefore recommended that this proposal be supported to progress through the Gateway process.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
1.⇩ |
Council’s detailed assessment Checklist |
2.⇩ |
Proponent Planning Proposal |
3.⇩ |
Indicative Concept Architectural Plans |
4.⇩ |
Urban Design Report |
5.⇩ |
Traffic Impact Assessment |
6.⇩ |
Preliminary Flood assessment |
7.⇩ |
Acid Sulfate Soils Assessment |
8.⇩ |
Economic Strategic Positioning Paper |
9.⇩ |
Geotechnical Assessment |
10.⇩ |
Proposed LEP Maps |
11.⇩ |
IWLPP Report |
12.⇩ |
IWLPP Meeting Minutes |
13.⇩ |
Proponent’s Response to IWLPP Minutes |
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Season extension Fanny Durack Aquatic Centre
Prepared By: Simon Duck - Senior Manager Aquatics
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
RECOMMENDATION That Council endorse the extension of the Fanny Durack Aquatic Centre summer swimming season on a trial basis in 2025 to include April. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report provides an overview for progress to extend the swimming season at the Fanny Durack Aquatic centre (FDAC) to include April and September of each year and to install a free outdoor gym co-located with FDAC, with a report back to be provided back to Council.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 22 October 2024, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council investigate opportunities to extend the outdoor swimming season at Fanny Durack Aquatic Centre (FDAC) from 1 September until 30 April annually, and to install a free outdoor gym co-located with FDAC, with a report back to Council to be tabled by the February 2025 meeting.
2. That as part of the report, undertake community engagement on extending the outdoor swimming season and installation of a free outdoor gym, including a) writing to neighbouring residents and businesses; b) on Council’s Your Say website and social media platforms; and c) community engagement stalls at FDAC/Petersham Park.
DISCUSSION
Community engagement for the request to consider the season extension of the FDAC and to confirm the location of the fitness equipment located in Petersham is due to take place during March 2025. In relation to the season extension for the FDAC, residents and users of the FDAC will be asked if they endorse a proposal to extend the summer swimming season to include September and April each year. In relation to the location of the fitness equipment, residents and users of the Petersham Park will be asked to provide feedback on their preferred location for outdoor fitness equipment where several key locations have been identified.
The community will be notified via letterbox delivery, notification of FDAC members through direct email contact, signage at the FDAC, website and social media.
This report seeks Council endorsement that the summer swimming season for the FDAC be temporarily extended to include the April period in 2025. This will allow community consultation to take place and a report be prepared tabling outcomes of the community engagement for both items to be brought back to Council.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Estimated additional costs for the season extension of the FDAC will be approx. $68,000 per month totalling $136,000 including both the September and April period. These amounts have been budgeted for in the draft 2025/2026 budget. Final financial implications will be tabled in the report to Council in May 2025, at the completion of the engagement period.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Bins and Cleaner Streets
Prepared By: Erin White - Manager Resource Recovery and Fleet Services
Authorised By: Ryann Midei - Director Infrastructure
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council endorse the phased trial of FOGO and Recycling in Parks, commencing with Phase 1 at Enmore Park, Marrickville Park and Pioneer Park Leichhardt.
2. That Council commit the required funding for the trial which is detailed in the funding implications of this report in the draft 2025/26 budget.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
1: An ecologically sustainable Inner West 4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The November 2024 Council resolution calls for one major park per ward to trial FOGO and expand recycling.
It is proposed that there is a phased approach to trialling FOGO and Recycling, and to undertake both services within the same trial Park to test the variables to its success. It is important to form the correct base approach for the trial to lead to success before expanding across the 5 parks – one in each ward.
On this basis, it is proposed that phase one of the trial for Park FOGO and recycling include:
1. Pioneer Park Leichhardt- this is a high profile, frequently used on both weekdays and weekends for a lunch spot and by families using the playground. It is serviceable at night with good lighting and road access for collection vehicles.
2. Enmore Park Marrickville – This is a large park with a playground, Café and aquatic centre amid residential streets and adjacent to Marrickville Metro with good visual surveillance. It is a busy park for picnics, dog walking, play and socialising hosting events. It is serviceable at night with good lighting and road access for collection vehicles.
It is proposed to commence phase one on 1 July 2025 for a period of 4 months. This commencement timeframe will miss the hotter summer months and allow adequate time for planning and the delivery of bin infrastructure.
Contamination in a FOGO bin in a park will be defined as anything that is not food. This includes food packaging, food wrappings, dog poo (within the compostable or other bags) and any other domestic waste that is not food.
In the event phase 1 of the trial is successful, it is proposed to extend the trail as a part of phase 2 to:
· Petersham Park, Petersham
· Whites Creek, Annandale
· Wicks Park or Henson Park, Marrickville
· Tempe Reserve, Tempe
In this eventuality, it is proposed to conduct the trial (phase 1 and 2) until 30 June 2026 and table a report to Council for its consideration at its conclusion. This will allow for all weather conditions across the period to be assessed prior to any further expansion.
Council services litter bins located in parks broadly on the size and usage of the park. Council services street litter bin collections daily in all town centres of the LGA and main streets. This is a seven (7) day a week operation.
Council’s main street high pressure cleaning program runs to the following service levels:
· Quarterly high pressure cleans of all main street areas (serviced once every 3 months)
· Fortnightly hotspot servicing – north and south runs alternating one area a week.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 12 November 2024, Council resolved the following:
That Council request officers report back in March 2025 with:
a) The existing schedule of bin emptying/servicing for local parks;
b) The existing schedule of bin emptying/servicing for street bins;
c) The existing schedule for spray cleaning streets;
d) The indicative costs of spray cleaning streets at current levels;
e) The indicative costs of bin servicing in local parks at current levels;
f) The indicative costs of street bin servicing at current levels;
g) The outline of a communications plan to educate residents and deter illegal dumping in local parks and street bins;
h) A plan to enable residents to nominate locations for additional street bins or bins in local parks;
i) A plan to trial FOGO in major parks, including a list of major parks where a trial may be suitable, with at least one park in each ward nominated, as well as to expand recycling in parks; and
j) The intended use of the $400,000 litter prevention grant received from the NSW Government.
DISCUSSION
Park Bins
Council services litter bins located in parks broadly on the size and usage of the park. This is generally:
· Large high use parks, which are serviced three (3) times per week and both days on the weekend.
· Medium size parks that are serviced two- three times (2-3) times per week and one day over the weekend.
· Smaller pocket parks that will be serviced once during the week. It should be noted that some smaller parks do not contain bins due to the nature of the usage of the park.
Park litter bins are subject to seasonal variation with higher park usage for picnics, sports, general patronage of passive and active recreation affecting the amount of waste generated and disposed from the park. Council officers will often adjust the frequency of collection on a as required basis to meet the demands on the park. This is preferred to increasing the number of bins within the park and ensures a financially sustainable approach to the service while meeting community needs.
It should be noted that litter bins in parks and street bins are collected by the same fleet of trucks and as such the cost of service cannot be separated.
The servicing of park and street bins at the current service level is approximately $2,093,000 per annum. This includes staff and fleet costs, and disposal costs that include the section 88 levy.
Street Litter Bins
Council services street litter bin collections daily in all town centres of the LGA and main streets. This is a seven (7) day a week operation.
Litter bins located on streets away from main roads and town centres are collected generally 3 times per week. There are a number of scenarios which impact the service rate which officers respond to by increasing the service as required. This includes but not limited to: the amount of foot traffic that passes the bin, well used bus stops in the vicinity, presence of shops/cafes nearby, and whether the bin is adjacent to any other public transport corridor or station.
As noted above, litter bins in parks and street bins are collected by the same fleet of trucks and as such the cost of service cannot be separated.
The servicing of park and street bins at the current service level is approximately $2,093,000 per annum. This includes staff and fleet costs, and disposal costs that include the section 88 levy.
The placement of bins is determined by a number of factors, conditions of development pertaining to multi unit dwelling development, plans of management or parks, operational necessity and resident input.
Residents can currently request new bin locations via Councils online CRM portal. Council officers assess the feasibility and demand for the requested bin and take action as required, along with contacting the resident to discuss the outcome.
High Pressure Cleaning
Council’s main street high pressure cleaning program runs to the following service levels:
· Quarterly high pressure cleans of all main street areas (serviced once every 3 months)
· Fortnightly hotspot servicing – north and south runs alternating one area a week. This program targets areas including but not limited to Pride Square, Loyalty Square and Alex Trevallion Plaza.
The annual budget for this service is currently $205,000 at the current service levels.
Trailing FOGO and Recycling in Parks
The November 2024 Council resolution calls for one major park per ward to trial FOGO and expand recycling.
It is proposed that there is a phased approach to trialling FOGO and Recycling, and to undertake both services within the same trial Park to test the variables to its success.
FOGO
It is proposed that the first phase test and or consider:
· Exact placement would be determined based on use within the park. Baseline audits and surveillance would be undertaken on weekdays and weekends prior to installation.
· Gravity lid locks on green swing lid high top fixed bin lids. This ensures lids cannot be opened for larger waste, the swing lid at the front allows food scraps and deters access for pests, whilst containing odour.
· The bins would be standard wheelie bins fixed to posts (removable for emptying) with a false bottom to make cleaning easier.
· Signage would demonstrate common park food items without packaging and QR codes linking to more information.
· Emptying would take place as part of residential collection routes and volume and contamination monitored.
· FOGO (and recycling) should be part of a bin bank with garbage disposal points on either side as behaviour research shows people often use the first bin they come to.
· Dog poo bins (waste) and bags would need to be provided to avoid disposal in FOGO contaminating the load.
· FOGO is a night collection and noise impacts need to be managed.
· Placement needs to be accessible and safe for collection crews.
· Collection schedules need to be mapped as FOGO is a scheduled collection, visiting each residential zone once weekly.
· Bins are outside and subject to weather conditions, this may result in flies, maggots and smell with the collection of largely food only (absence of garden organic waste
· Cleaning schedules are needed as food will stick to the side of the bin. Bins can’t be lined as the large compostable liners are not accepted by the processor.
· Contamination by dog poo and food packaging is expected in addition to visitors unfamiliar with the residential FOGO service as out of area users.
· Street litter and parks bins may also be used by businesses and residents
· Contaminated bins need to be disposed as garbage, so not to contaminate residential FOGO streams with low contamination rates that create the highest quality compost for use by farmers.
Recycling in parks
Public place and event recycling has been problematic in
Australia and is recommended to simplify collection to only bottles and cans
(the primary recyclables in public places) and placing them in open collection
cages with clear signage allowing community members to access bottles and cans
for return and earn.
This allows for waste avoidance, recycling and supports community members participating in return and earn. By allowing community ownership of these bottles and cans, collection costs are avoided, minimising cost to Council.
Communication
A landing page to be transparent to the community about the trial and outcomes will be required (including contamination). Communications and engagement would include:
· Print and online comms
· What’s On Inner Wests and Environment & Sustainability newsletters
· Socials (Instagram and Facebook)
· Static screens in service centres, aquatics centres, libraries and gyms
· Posters in the trial park
· Community champions – known groups/supporters/staff in area as visual surveillance
· Internal stakeholders (customer service, parks cleaning and maintenance crews, waste ops, companion animals/rangers and parkers)
A communication plan to educate residents and deter illegal dumping in local parks and street bins is also being developed. This is to target hot spots and provide education to inform residents of their options to reasonably dispose of items.
Trial Approach
As detailed above, it is important to form the correct base approach for the trial to lead to success before expanding across the 5 parks – one in each ward.
On this basis, it is proposed that phase one of the trial for Park FOGO and recycling include:
1. Pioneer Park Leichhardt- this is a high profile, frequently used on both weekdays and weekends for a lunch spot and by families using the playground. It is serviceable at night with good lighting and road access for collection vehicles.
2. Enmore Park Marrickville – This is a large park with a playground, Café and aquatic centre amid residential streets and adjacent to Marrickville Metro with good visual surveillance. It is a busy park for picnics, dog walking, play and socialising hosting events. It is serviceable at night with good lighting and road access for collection vehicles.
It is proposed to commence phase one on 1 July 2025 for a period of 4 months. This commencement timeframe will miss the hotter summer months and allow adequate time for planning and the delivery of bin infrastructure.
Contamination in a FOGO bin in a park will be defined as anything that is not food. This includes food packaging, food wrappings, dog poo (within the compostable or other bags) and any other domestic waste that is not food.
Council’s current FOGO processing contract contains penalties associated with the amount of contamination in each truck load, and as such should be used for success benchmarking in the trial. In this regard, the contamination amount of a truck load needs to be below 5% to be free of penalties. Penalties are applied for truck loads between 5 to 10%. Once the contamination level is 10% or greater, the contents of the truck load is landfilled and the landfill rate, including the landfill levy applied.
Council is currently meeting contamination targets in the domestic stream. In order to keep the FOGO product contaminant free and continue its use by farmers in the western plains, it is proposed to adhere to the same conditions for the trial but with each bin rather than truck load.
The initial trial would then be evaluated using data and qualitative information to inform the expansion to the other wards.
In the event phase 1 of the trial is successful, it is proposed to inform Councillors via a briefing note and extend the trail as a part of phase 2 to:
· Petersham Park, Petersham
· Whites Creek, Annandale
· Wicks Park or Henson Park, Marrickville
· Tempe Reserve, Tempe
In this eventuality, it is proposed to conduct the trial (phase 1 and 2) until 30 June 2026 and table a report to Council for its consideration at its conclusion. This will allow for all weather conditions across the period prior to any further expansion.
In the event phase 1 of the trial is not successful, it is proposed to table a report to Council for consideration.
Litter prevention Grant
Inner West Council is undertaking a litter prevention project funded by a grant of $400,000 from the NSW EPA to fund the next 3 years of this project. Council is working closely with partners Cooks River Alliance and the Parramatta River Catchment Group to deliver an ambitious local litter prevention target of 30% reduction in plastic litter by 2025 and a 60% reduction in overall litter by 2030.
The Inner West Litter-Less Roadmap has been developed to connect teams across Council and engage with community and other organisation to achieve litter targets outlined in our Zero Waste Strategy and NSW Waste and Sustainable Materials Strategy. Inner West will Litter Less through the following strategic directions:
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The introduction of FOGO and recycling in parks will require infrastructure and education. It is expected these elements of phase 1 (2 parks) would cost approximately $30,000. A substantial component of this amount pertains to developing signage and education.
An additional $30,000 is expected to be required should the trial progress to phase 2 (additional 3 parks). This amount is the same as phase 1 albeit including an extra park as signage and education deliverables are undertaken as part of phase 1.
It is proposed to fund the trial from Operational budgets as a part of the draft 2025/26 budget.
These amounts do not include disposal of FOGO or recycling items. In this regard, the diversion of products away from landfill is considered to result in at least at a cost natural approach for the disposal of products. Further analysis of costs and budgets will be required following the conclusion of the trial.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Two All-Weather Fields in Callan Park Update
Prepared By: Michael Craven - Projects Delivery Manager
Authorised By: Ryann Midei - Director Infrastructure
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council endorse proceeding with detailed design development, planning approval and delivery stages for the two All-Weather Fields within Callan Park.
2. That Council delegate authority to the General Manager to enter into agreements or similar pertaining to the planning and approval process for the two All-Weather Fields within Callan Park.
3. That Council commit to the required funding detailed in the funding implications of this report for the two All-Weather Fields within Callan Park as a part of the 2025/26 budget. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Waterfront Drive sporting ground currently accommodates two senior natural turf soccer fields and one natural turf cricket field totalling approximately 15,000m2. Balmain Road sporting ground currently accommodates one senior natural turf soccer field totalling approximately 7,000m2.
The investigation stage for the two new All-Weather Sporting Fields within Callan Park is now complete along with the development of concept plans and costs estimates. The project is now ready to proceed to detailed design development and obtain planning approval.
The design consultant provided a cost estimate for the concept designs in the order of $8,220,000 which includes the two All-Weather fields, landscaping and some footpath work. It is recommended to include the required funding for the project as a part of the 2025/26 budget.
The draft concept designs were presented to Balmain District Football Club and Leichhardt Saints Football Club who have provided positive feedback and support for these plans to proceed to detailed design development.
Council will continue to involve the Balmain District Football Club and Leichhardt Saints Football Club during the proceeding stages of the project.
A Part 4 planning pathway will be required to deliver the all-weather Sporting Fields in Callan Park and as such a Development Application (DA) is required. The State Environmental Planning Policy (Planning Systems) 2021 – Schedule 6 identifies, as this project would be a Council related development over $5M, the DA consent would be determined by the Regional Planning Panel.
The DA will need to be referred to Heritage Council of NSW for assessment as Callan Park landscaping is on the NSW State Heritage Register.
After previous interactions with the Heritage Council, council was advised to consult and engage with them prior to the preparation of any future development applications and section 60 applications for public facilities within Callan Park.
In December 2024 council applied to the Heritage Council to present the All-Weather Sporting field proposal, requesting pre-lodgement comments on the proposed works. On 6 February 2025, Council followed up this request with a letter from Mayor Byrne to the Minister for Environment and Heritage requesting an update on council’s request for a pre-lodgement presentation and councils concern that these projects will be unnecessarily delayed without confirmation of a time to brief the Heritage Council. To date council has not received a response. Council is now hoping to present the proposal to the April 2025 Heritage Council monthly meeting.
Council continues to drive the project with all stakeholders to ensure works are undertaken as expeditiously as possible.
BACKGROUND
Waterfront Drive sporting ground currently accommodates two senior natural turf soccer fields and one natural turf cricket field totalling approximately 15,000m2. Balmain Road sporting ground currently accommodates one senior natural turf soccer field totalling approximately 7,000m2.
In 2013, Leichhardt Council entered into a lease agreement with the Health Administration Corporation for the care, control, management and use of Balmain Road and Glover Street sporting grounds located within Callan Park, Lilyfield.
In 2020, Inner West Council entered into a new 10-year lease agreement with the Health Administration Corporation to include Waterfront Drive Sporting Ground for the care, control, management, and use of the land described as “Part of the Land, collectively known as the Callan Park Sporting Grounds” being Glover Street, Balmain Road and Waterfront Drive sporting grounds. The new lease agreement commenced on 1 September 2020 and extends to 31 August 2030.
At the Council Meeting held on 13 August 2024, Council resolved the following in part:
1. That Council commit to delivering two new rectangular all-weather sporting fields in Callan Park, one at the Balmain Road field and another at the Waterfront Drive fields. The approximate cost of these facilities is $7 million - $8 million with the funds to be allocated from the additional $20 million committed by the NSW Government to completing to Rozelle Parklands and / or providing alternate sporting facilities nearby to the Parklands.
5. That Council commence the design process for both all-weather sporting fields with Leichhardt Saints Football Club and Balmain & District Football Club to be included in the design process from the outset and throughout the process. The two projects are to be undertaken concurrently with the aim being that works commence at the end of the 2025 winter season.
10. That Council prepare a report to be received at the October Ordinary Council meeting outlining the design and approval process and cost estimates for the project.
At the Council Meeting held on 3 December 2024, a project update report was provided outlining the required approval process and the next steps to deliver this project. The report noted that council officers would commence the investigation and design development stages and prepare concept designs for the consideration of Council at the March 2025 Council meeting. The March Council report will also include details on project particulars including cost and delivery timeframes. This report addresses these items.
DISCUSSION
Council engaged a design consultant for the investigation stage, preparation of draft concept designs and estimated construction cost estimates for the two All-Weather fields within Callan Park.
Investigations
The investigation stage for the two new All-Weather Sporting Fields within Callan Park is now complete. Council officers are now using the information and data gained from the investigation stage for direction in the design development stage of the project.
The investigations have identified an Ausgrid easement in the location of the proposed All-Weather field at Waterfront Drive Sporting ground. Council has contacted Ausgrid and the initial feedback from Ausgrid is that an All-Weather field can be constructed over the Easement though Ausgrid would require additional conduits to be installed adjacent to the existing electrical conduits, as a provision for additional future cables. The additional electrical conduits have been allowed for in the project cost estimates.
In addition, a Sydney Water sewer line was also identified in the location of the proposed All-Weather field at Waterfront Drive Sporting ground. Council will work with Sydney Water to identify feasible options to ensure this asset is protected and will not become a risk over the lifespan of the All-Weather field. An estimated cost for this works has been included in the project cost estimate.
The existing floodlighting at Waterfront Drive Sporting Ground was constructed in 2019 and is 200lux, which is in line with council sporting ground lighting strategy and does not require upgrading as part of the project. The existing floodlighting at Balmain Road Sporting Ground was constructed in 2013 and is 100lux, it is recommended that the floodlighting at Balmain Road be upgraded to 200lux in line with council sporting ground lighting strategy. This will involve adding additional luminaires to the existing floodlight poles.
These items can be managed through normal project practices and have been allowed for in the project considerations, conceptual approach and cost estimates.
As per the August 2024 resolution, Leichhardt Saints Football Club and Balmain & District Football Club were met with to understand their design considerations to inform the process.
Concept Designs
Council, working with the design consultants, have prepared the below draft concept designs for the single All-Weather field at Waterfront Drive and Balmain Road Sporting Grounds. The proposed scope generally includes the construction of single all-weather fields and associated works at each ground, new luminaries for the Balmain Road field, and landscaping and footpath works.
The draft concept designs were presented to Balmain District Football Club and Leichhardt Saints Football Club who have provided positive feedback and support for these plans to proceed to design development.
Waterfront Drive Sporting Ground -Proposed Single All-Weather Field – Draft Concept Design
Waterfront Drive Sporting Ground -Proposed Single All-Weather Field – Artist Impression
Balmain Road Sporting Ground – Proposed single All-Weather Field – Draft Concept Design
Balmain Road Sporting Ground – Proposed single All-Weather Field – Artist Impression
Planning Approval Process
A Part 4 planning pathway will be required to deliver the all-weather Sporting Fields in Callan Park and as such a Development Application (DA) is required. The State Environmental Planning Policy (Planning Systems) 2021 – Schedule 6 identifies, as this project would be a Council related development over $5M, the DA consent would be determined by the Regional Planning Panel.
The DA will need to be referred to Heritage Council of NSW for assessment as Callan Park landscaping is on the NSW State Heritage Register.
The Part 4 approval process will ensure the community and stakeholders are aware of the upgrade and empowered to have their say.
Council is currently preparing the required documents for the DA and will commence communications with Greater Sydney Parklands to facilitate collaboration for the delivery of the two all-weather Sporting Fields within Callan Park.
The preparation of planning approval documents for the DA and planning approval will occur concurrently with the design development stage.
It is recommended that Inner West Council delegates authority to the General Manager to enter into any required agreements for the above.
Heritage – Callan Park
Callan Park is a state significant site owned by the NSW Government and managed by the Greater Sydney Parklands Authority. Callan Park Conservation Area and Buildings were listed on the NSW State Heritage Register in April 1999.
As the proposed All-Weather fields are being constructed within Callan Park, under the Heritage Act 1977, a section 60 works approval will be required in conjunction with the development application. This application is the pathway for heritage approvals following determination of an integrated development application.
After previous interactions with the Heritage Council, council was advised to consult and engage with them prior to the preparation of any future development applications and section 60 applications for public facilities within Callan Park.
In December 2024 council applied to the Heritage Council to present the All-Weather Sporting field proposal, requesting pre-lodgement comments on the proposed works. On 6 February 2025, Council followed up this request with a letter from Mayor Byrne to the Minister for Environment and Heritage requesting an update on council’s request for a pre-lodgement presentation and councils concern that these projects will be unnecessarily delayed without confirmation of a time to brief the Heritage Council. Council received a response to the letter on 28 February 2024 and a meeting has now been scheduled in early April for Council to present the proposal.
Estimated Project Schedule
Milestones |
|
September 2023– March 2025 |
Preliminary investigations, draft concept design development and identification of key stakeholders |
March 2025 |
Report to council on concept designs and cost estimate, next steps, and estimated timelines. |
April 2025 |
Presentation to Heritage Council NSW |
March 2025 – June 2025
|
Preparation of Development Application |
July 2025 |
Development Application lodgement |
July 2025 – March 2026 |
Planning Approval - Council has allowed 8 months for the planning approval |
July 2025 – March 2026 |
Detailed design stage |
April 2025 – May 2026 |
Principal Certifier issuing Construction Certificate |
March 2026 – May 2026 |
Construction contractor procurement |
June 2026 |
Construction Tender Recommendation Approval report to June 2026 council meeting |
August 2026– March 2027 |
Construction period |
April 2027 |
Construction completed |
The schedule aims to provide the most expeditious schedule as possible, with construction commencing as soon as practical given long lead time items including the approval process. This anticipates construction commencing in August 2026.
Council continues to drive the project with all stakeholders to ensure works are undertaken as expeditiously as possible.
It’s worth noting that this timeframe also minimises the impact on the sporting clubs and their winter sports season, and ensures the project is completed prior to the commencement of the 2027 winter sports season.
Balmain District Football Club and Leichhardt Saints have supported construction commencing in early August (Last month of winter sports season) to ensure the project is delivered in time for the commencement of the next winter sports season in April the following year.
Next Steps
Council officers will commence the design development, planning approval and delivery stages. This will include working expeditiously to prepare all the required documentation to submit the development application in July 2025 to ensure the project can be delivered as per the project schedule outlined above.
Council will concurrently present the proposal to Heritage Council NSW for endorsement during the detailed design development stage.
Council will continue to involve the Balmain District Football Club and Leichhardt Saints Football Club during the proceeding stages of the project.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Council resolved at its August 2024 meeting to fund the project from the additional $20 million committed by the NSW Government to Rozelle Parklands and / or providing alternate sporting facilities nearby to the Parklands.
Section 7.11 contributions could potentially be utilised to fund the estimated cost of works as well.
The design consultant provided a cost estimate for the concept designs in the order of $8,220,000 which includes the All-Weather fields, landscaping and some footpath work. A 20% construction contingency has been applied given the early stage of the design development and based upon the findings of the investigation stage.
WATERFRONT DRIVE ALL-WEATHER FIELD |
COST |
Design Consultancy Fees & Planning Approval |
$ 150,000 |
Construction 1 x All-Weather Field & Landscaping |
$3,600,000 |
20% Project Contingency |
$ 750,000 |
|
$4,500,000 |
|
|
BALMAIN ROAD ALL-WEATHER FIELD |
|
Design Consultancy Fees & Planning Approval |
$ 150,000 |
Construction 1 x All-Weather Field & Landscaping |
$2,950,000 |
20% Project Contingency |
$ 620,000 |
|
$3,720,000 |
|
|
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST |
$8,220,000 |
It’s worth noting that the Waterfront Drive All-Weather Field cost estimate is higher than the Balmain Road All-Weather Field cost estimate. This is due to the Waterfront Drive field being slightly larger in size than the Balmain Road field and the additional costs associated with the future proofing of the Ausgrid and Sydney Water assets.
The estimated cost is within the available funding envelope. It is recommended to include the required funding for the project as a part of the 2025/26 budget.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Expression of Interest process for the use of the basement within Marrickville Town Hall
Prepared By: Scott Mullen - Strategic Investments and Property Manager
Authorised By: Ruth Callaghan - Director Community
RECOMMENDATION
That Council endorse the preparation of an Expression of Interest for the use of the basement within Marrickville Town Hall. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
3: Creative communities and a strong economy |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Council has resolved to use Marrickville Town Hall for live music and multicultural performances.
This report sets out the proposed process for preparing an Expression of Interest (EOI) to test the market for operators to manage and program the basement, which will be developed by the Council into a flexible performance space.
The EOI will require that the basement is used in line with Council's cultural and community strategic outcomes. Applicants must propose a management model that meets certain criteria. Both commercial and not-for-profit arts and culture organisations will be encouraged to apply to manage and operate the basement consistent with Council’s property management approach.
A Service Level Agreement with the Council will be required for the successful applicant, outlining specific services and responsibilities to ensure the basement is used for community benefit and demonstrates public and cultural value.
The ground level main hall, and the various other rooms on the ground level that are activated as part of the Creative Use of Town Halls project will continue to be managed by Council.
BACKGROUND
Based on learnings from the Creative Use of Council Venues Pilot Program, at the 3 December 2023 meeting, Council resolved to fit out the Marrickville Town Hall basement as a flexible performance space for the local creative industry and community.
As previously resolved by Council, the space will be fitted out as a black-box – a flexible set up common in the creative industry which provides versatility for multipurpose use, including live performance.
At the Council meeting held on 3 December 2024, an update was provided that included a detailed scope of works for the fit out. As significant internal works will be required, a Request for Quotation (RFQ) will have to be developed and put to the market.
Once the RFQ process is complete and a contractor is appointed, construction will take approximately eight weeks. It is envisaged that the entire process may take up to six months.
At the Council meeting held on 3 December 2024, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council receive and note the report.
2. That Council report back in February 2025 with further information about an Expression of Interest process for the use of the basement or other spaces within Marrickville Town Hall as a venue for live music and multicultural performance.
DISCUSSION
It is proposed that the EOI process for an organisation to manage, operate and program the basement would occur in parallel to the fit out, so that a proponent can be identified, and an agreement can be negotiated so the basement can be occupied and operates as soon as the works are completed.
Overview of this EOI Process
The purpose of this EOI process is to ensure that the basement within Marrickville Town Hall is utilised in ways that align with Council's cultural and community strategic outcomes, while fostering a diverse and accessible range of cultural activities.
The EOI will test the market for interested organisations that can manage the basement as a creative space, oversighting both content and bookings. The successful applicant would aim to attract artists, performers, and cultural organisations to contribute to the vibrancy and inclusivity of the local community through innovative and high-quality programming.
Applicants could be either commercial or not-for-profit organisations, as a single entity or consortia, that can demonstrate an understanding of the needs and aspirations of the Inner West community and meet Council’s existing policy requirements in relation to creative use of town halls. Submissions from consortia must nominate a lead organisation with whom a suitable agreement can be negotiated.
It is anticipated that the EOI would be a two stage process that would see successful applicants shortlisted and then invited to submit a further detailed business case.
Interested applicants will outline their interest in operating a performance venue featuring live music and cultural performances and provide a description on the proposed operational model including information on how bookings would be managed and programming content determined as well as how the venue will serve the community through commercial or programming activities.
The Management Model
Once the fit-out is complete the main space in the basement will be a versatile space suitable for intimate gatherings, rehearsals, and smaller-scale performances. There will be a number of other small rooms that can be used for a variety of purposes, including soundproof rooms, as well as toilets and a kitchen.
Applicants would be required to detail the management model that will be used to manage and operate the basement and the successful applicant will be responsible for staffing and all related employment conditions and compliance for operating the spaces. The model should also consider the financial implications of managing and operating the basement.
Eligibility Criteria
To ensure the successful use of the basement aligns with cultural and community strategic outcomes the criteria will include but not be limited to:
· Provide a fair and equitable booking process for creatives to apply to use the basement
· Provide a model that is financially sustainable and follows Council’s fees and charges schedule for bookings
· Give priority to Inner West creatives for use of the space
· Applicants will be required to demonstrate suitable experience in delivering similar models
· Applicants will need to demonstrate a strong knowledge of the Inner West creative sector
Shortlisted Proposals
Following the evaluation of the EOI’s, Council will then select one or more applicants to progress to the final assessment stage. Applicants will be requested to provide further information to support their proposals and deliver a presentation on how they will deliver the public value for the project.
Following this further evaluation will be undertaken and a successful applicant will be selected to enter into negotiations for the lease and SLA with Council.
Proposed Timeline
The proposed timeline for the EOI process aligns with the estimated completion of the building works and will be approximately six months.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The project will be managed and funded by Strategic Investments and Property with a budget of approximately $654,000 for the ‘black box’ works, already allocated as per Council resolution.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Early Childhood Education Waitlist Fee
Prepared By: Maria Pappas - Senior Manager Children's Services
Authorised By: Ruth Callaghan - Director Community
RECOMMENDATION
That Council abolish the waitlist fee for Early Childhood Services where applicable.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report recommends that the waitlist fee of $28.00 per child be abolished. The social and administrative benefits outweigh the potential costs and will provide a more positive experience for families, particularly those from vulnerable backgrounds. When offset by annual IT subscription, the anticipated loss in revenue is approximately $19,000 per annum.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 18 February 2025, Council resolved the following:
1. That council consider abolishing the waitlist fee for inner West Council’s Early Education services, including pre-school, early learning centres, family day care and occasional care, as part of the 2025-2026 Fees and Charges policy.
2. That council provides a report to the March 2025 Council meeting detailing the potential costs, benefits and consequences of abolishing the fees.
DISCUSSION
Waitlist applications are currently accepted from the time of confirmation of pregnancy.
The Inner West Council waitlist is currently managed via a web-based IT platform ‘my waitlist’ and can be accessed via Inner West Council’s website.
A fee of $28.00 per child is incurred with each waitlist application to help offset the administrative management of the waitlist and placements. The waitlist does not apply to occasional care.
Across the sector early learning centres often have extensive waitlists due to factors such as population growth, limited places and demand for high quality.
In the Inner West, demand sometimes exceeds supply. The idea of the waitlist fee is that the payment shows a commitment by families that they will take an offered place when it is available. In 2023/24 there were 840 children on the waitlist and 55 were from vulnerable families (e.g. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander, living with disability, low income).
Based on 2023/24 actuals, income from the fee was approximately $25,000. The potential cost of abolishing the fee would be approximately $27,000 in foregone revenue for 2025/26. However, it would also remove a financial barrier to access. In practice, many vulnerable and low-income families do not place themselves on the list. Many vulnerable families may be on the list but do not end up paying the fee. Instead, they approach services directly via word of mouth, agency referrals or outreach by staff and local family workers. For example, of the 55 vulnerable families on the waitlist in 2023/24 approximately 40 did not pay the fee.
Potential benefits of abolishing the waitlist include:
· Abolishing the waitlist fee will remove a potential barrier to access for lower income and vulnerable families and enhance Council’s reputation for equity.
· Without the fee, families are likely to put their child on the waitlist earlier and that will potentially aid in better planning and resource allocation across Council’s services.
· If the waitlist is abolished, Council will not have to support/maintain a separate IT platform specifically for the list at an annual cost of $8,000. It will also reduce staff time on administration.
Potential costs of abolishing the waitlist include:
· Increased demand for available early learning places. This can be mitigated by each service applying existing priority of access guidelines (which is current policy/practice).
· Loss of income to Council of approximately $27,000 in 2025/26 which is used to offset the cost of service delivery. This would be offset to $19,000 as a result of not paying the annual $8,000 for the IT subscription for the waitlist platform.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
It is anticipated that the potential loss of income in 2025/26 would be $27,000. However, this would be offset by the $8,000 annual expense for the IT subscription platform.
The loss of income would be approximately $19,000.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Local Traffic Committee Meeting- 17 February 2025
Prepared By: Manod Wickramasinghe - Traffic and Transport Planning Manager
Authorised By: Ryann Midei - Director Infrastructure
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and adopt the recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee meeting held on 17 February 2025. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The February 2025 meeting of the Local Traffic Committee was held at the Ashfield Service Centre and have made recommendations for Council consideration and adoption.
DISCUSSION
The February 2025 meeting of the Local Traffic Committee was held at the Ashfield Service Centre. The minutes of the meeting are shown in Attachment 1.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report. Projects proposed for implementation are funded within existing budget allocations.
ITEMS BY WARD –
Ward |
Item |
Baludarri (Balmain)
|
Beattie Street at Mullens Street, Balmain - Proposed Raised Pedestrian Crossing |
Renwick Street & Marion Street, Leichhardt - Proposed Intersection Line Marking Upgrades |
|
Robert Street, Rozelle - Ministry of Sound Traffic Management Plan |
|
Lilyfield Road, Lilyfield - Bus Zone Removal |
|
Leichhardt Oval Special Event Parking Scheme 2025 |
|
Proposed Parking Restriction Operational Hours Extension - Rozelle South Precinct |
|
Gulgadya (Leichhardt)
|
Nil. |
Midjuburi (Marrickville)
|
Lower Railway Parade, Sydenham – Temporary medium-term 12P parking changes during major rail shutdown of T3 line for Sydney Metro Upgrade works |
Charlotte Avenue, Marrickville at Myrtle Street and Victoria Road - Temporary full road closure and temporary regulatory signage changes– Sydney Water sewer upgrade works Marrickville CTMP |
|
Illawarra Road, Marrickville - Proposed roadside barrier |
|
182-189 Victoria Road and 28-30 Faversham Street, Marrickville (Wicks Park) - Traffic intersection assessment |
|
Albermarle Street, Marrickville – Temporary Full Road Closure of Rail Overbridge south of Challis Street - Sydney Metro SWM4 works CTMP |
|
Goodsell Street, St Peters - Request for an extension to times and days of the existing residential parking scheme |
|
Temporary No Parking Restrictions proposed on Marrickville Road, Marrickville
|
|
Djarrawunang (Ashfield)
|
Robert Street at Holden Street, Ashfield- New at-grade pedestrian (zebra) crossing- amended plan |
Damun (Stanmore) |
Brighton Street, Petersham - Heavy Vehicle Access |
All Wards |
Nil. |
1.⇩ |
Local Traffic Committee Meeting - Minutes - 17 February 2025 |
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Post Exhibition - Proposal for an off Leash Area for Companion Animals at Steel Park
Prepared By: Aaron Callaghan - Parks Planning and Ecology Manager
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
RECOMMENDATION 1. That Council adopt a new off-leash area at Steel Park for smaller dogs (under 10kg) as highlighted in Figure 1.2 of the report.
2. That upon the establishment of the new off-leash area at Steel Park, Council undertake a compliance and educational program at both Steel Park and Mahoney Reserve in relation to regulations pertaining to off-leash usage. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport 3: Creative communities and a strong economy 4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities 5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report outlines the outcomes of community engagement in relation to the proposal for the introduction of a dog off-leash area in Steel Park, Marrickville, in response to a community petition requesting formalisation of the local community's long-term use of this area.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 25 June 2024, Council resolved the following in part:
1. That Council undertake community engagement on the introduction of a dog off-leash area in Steel Park, Marrickville, in response to a community petition requesting formalisation of the local community's long-term use of this area in this manner, and that this consultation include the PCYC and sporting clubs that utilise Steel Park. The area is bounded by the Marrickville PCYC, the carpark and Thornley Street.
The proposal for an off-leash area within Steel Park was developed taking into account the existing users and with respect to minimising increased Council maintenance requirements associated with such use. The proposal as consulted with the community was as follows:
1. Dogs are allowed off-leash on field number 2 only (northern field adjacent to PCYC (refer fig 1.0 below)
2. Dogs are allowed off-leash at all times except when organised sporting games, training and events are on at any field
3. That in the event this dog off-leash area is formalised, further consultation around the dog off-leash arrangements at Mahoney Reserve will take place, with a focus on additional education for dog owners using the park.
Figure 1.0 – Community
Engagement -Proposed Off-Leash Area Steel Park
DISCUSSION
From 9 September to 27 October 2024, the community was invited to provide feedback on a proposal for the creation of a dog off-leash area at Steel Park in Marrickville. Engagement was undertaken via Council’s Your Say Project Page with local residents and park users notified through postal flyers and also through the presence of corflute posters in the park. In addition, onsite community engagement was held at Steel Park on Saturday 26 October 2024.
The full results of the community engagement process can be accessed in Attachment 1. During the engagement period, 1,048 people visited the Your Say project page. A total of 142 individuals and 2 organisations provided feedback, including 129 responses to the online survey, 9 email responses, 3 in-person responses, 1 letter, and 1 phone call response.
A total of 12 people attended the drop-in engagement session held at Steel Park on Saturday 26 October 2024. In Summary the majority of respondents (62%), supported the proposal for an off-leash area, a total of 34% of respondents did not support the proposal and 4% were unsure.
In addition to the Your Say Survey, a number of email submissions were also received from community members. These submissions are provided in Attachment 2. A Council officer response to the issues raised is also provided.
Parks Planning Recommendations
While acknowledging the community support for dogs off-leash at Steel Park, Council officers are recommending the development of a fully fenced off-leash area for small dogs (under 10kg) in the area of the parkland between Thornley Street and the Steel Park car park area. The area in question is highlighted in Fig 1.2 below.
Fig 1.2 Proposed Fenced Companion Animal Exercise Area for Smaller Dogs (under 10kg)
The rationale for this recommendation is summarised as follows:
· There is already a major off-leash area for dogs of all sizes provided at Mahoney Reserve (less than 400m from Thornley Street)
· Council has an acute shortage of sporting grounds in the local government area and maintaining a good turf surface throughout the sporting season is becoming increasing challenging with additional sporting and community access demands.
· Safe access for local school groups needs to be maintained and it is acknowledged that Steel Park is a community hub which supports community, cultural, sporting and educational use.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
New mapping and ordinance signage for Steel Park is recommended at a cost of $800.00. Fencing works are estimated to cost $18,000. The costs of which will be managed through the Parks Operational budget.
Attachment 1 has been published separately in the Attachments Document on Council’s Website https://www.innerwest.nsw.gov.au/about/the-council/council-meetings/current-council-meetings
1.⇨ |
Steel Park Off Leash Engagement Report – Published Separately on Council’s website |
2.⇩ |
Individual submissions |
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Public Exhibition - Draft Compliance and Enforcement Policy
Prepared By: Michael Ryan - Senior Manager, Health & Building
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council publicly exhibit the draft Compliance and Enforcement Policy for a period of 28 days and seek community feedback on the proposed Policy.
2. That following the conclusion of the exhibition period, the draft Compliance and Enforcement Policy be brought back to Council for consideration for adoption.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
1: An ecologically sustainable Inner West 2: Livable, connected neighbourhoods and transport |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Council’s existing Compliance and Enforcement Policy dated June 2017 has been reviewed and updated to better support Council’s regulatory functions. It now incorporates current best practices, and improved alignment with the NSW Ombudsman Model Enforcement and Compliance Code, Council’s Complaint Handling Policy 2024 and the IWC Good Neighbour Policy 2024.
The draft Inner West Compliance and Enforcement Policy (Attachment 1) has been created in collaboration with key internal stakeholders.
Following this feedback, it is proposed to undertake community consultation on the policy.
BACKGROUND
Council’s existing Compliance Policy has not been updated since June 2017. An update is required to better support Council’s regulatory functions, incorporate best practice, align with other Council policies and the NSW Ombudsman Model Code.
DISCUSSION
Inner West Council has many and varied regulatory functions that allow Council to create, impose, enforce and administer rules that control the actions of others. Many of these enforcement actions can have serious consequences for business and individuals. When exercising these functions, Council must be confident this is occurring in a manner that is consistent, transparent and equitable, and thus ensure any regulatory action or penalty is commensurable to the nature, extent and severity of the noncompliance.
The new Compliance and Enforcement Policy provides the key stakeholders, information on the underlying principles of Council’s regulatory functions, the role of Council’s authorised officers, and a broad outline on the different enforcement and regulatory action that may be employed in different circumstances.
The Policy outlines the consideration and matters to be considered at each stage of Council’s enforcement process (from initial complaint to finalisation, including any internal reviews).
The Policy also acknowledges that individual circumstances of some matters may justify a departure from the established framework, where the full circumstances and facts are considered, and a decision is made on merit. This is reflected in the discretion afforded to Council’s authorised officers in the exercise of their functions.
As a result, the Policy establishes the framework to ensure Council’s regulatory functions are carried out:
· promptly, effectively, and consistently in response to allegations of unlawful activity or when undertaking proactive investigation of possible illegal activity.
· proportionally, without bias, and in accordance with legislation.
· to improve compliance management and reduce the impact of unlawful activity on the community and environment.
· with consideration to existing Council policies and management plans, such as the Good Neighbour Policy, Special Entertainment Precinct Management Plans and Council Complaint Handling Policy
To support staff in the practical implementation of this Policy a Compliance and Enforcement Protocol will be developed in consultation with internal stakeholders.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report
1.⇩ |
Draft Compliance and Enforcement Policy |
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Public Exhibition - Code of Conduct
Prepared By: Julian Sakarai - Acting Senior Manager Governance and Risk
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council publicly exhibit the draft Code of Conduct for a period of 28 days and seek community feedback on the proposed Policy.
2. That following the conclusion of the exhibition period, the draft Code of Conduct be brought back to Council for consideration for adoption.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Council is required to review its Code of Conduct within 12 months after a general election. Council is proposing to make changes to the Inner West Council Code of Conduct to prohibit staff from accepting gifts from suppliers, require staff to seek approval for any secondary employment on an annual basis, clarify conflict of interest disclosure processes, assist with the protection of Council information, clarify the timeframes for making Code of Conduct complaints, and assist with the processing of surrendered gifts and benefits. The draft Model Code of Conduct at Attachment 1 will be placed on exhibition for 28 days.
BACKGROUND
Council is required under section 440(7) of the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act) to review its Code of Conduct within the first 12 months after each local government election. The Code of Conduct must incorporate the provisions of the Model Code of Conduct (Model Code) prescribed by the Office of Local Government (OLG) pursuant to section 180(1) of the Local Government (General) Regulations 2021.
Inner West Council first adopted the Model Code in 2019 and it was last reviewed in 2022.
OLG released the Councillor Conduct and Meeting Practices Discussion Paper in September 2024. As part of this process, the OLG foreshadowed that it will prescribe a new Model Code but has not indicated when this will occur. Given the potential for a new Model Code to be prescribed in 2025, Officers recommend making only minor changes to Council’s Code of Conduct as part of this review round.
DISCUSSION
The Model Code sets the minimum ethical and behavioural standards of Council Official in NSW. Each council may amend its Code of Conduct subject to its Code not removing any provisions of the Model Code, or incorporating any matters that are inconsistent with the Model Code.
Each Council is able to amend its Code of Conduct to include standards that are higher than contained in the Model Code, and to clarify the application of provisions in its Code (if standards are higher).
Council is proposing to make changes to the Inner West Council Code of Conduct to make clearer the application of provisions affecting Council staff. The changes neither remove any provisions from the Model Code, nor introduce any matters that are inconsistent with the Model Code. Additionally, Officers recommend minor administrative changes to improve readability of the Code.
The following table outlines the material changes that have been made to the draft Code of Conduct (Attachment 1) and the reasons for the changes.
Clause |
Change |
Reason |
Code |
Typographical errors, grammar, style, renumbering |
To improve the readability and presentation of the Code and ensure consistency with the Model Code of Conduct. |
5.6 |
Requiring Council staff to disclose non-pecuniary conflicts of interest to their manager in writing in an approved format. |
Disclosures are currently made in a range of formats. Using an approved format will ensure consistency across Council. |
5.6 |
Requiring any disclosures made by Council staff to a Manager to be forwarded to Council’s Governance team for recording. |
To provide guidance and clarification on how disclosures should be managed and to assist with recording disclosures. |
5.24 |
Requiring Council staff to apply for annual approval for secondary employment. |
Administratively staff apply annually as a matter of convention, however, this is not a requirement of the Code. An annual application requirement will ensure that any outside employment does not conflict with an employee’s responsibilities or create work, health and safety issues. The requirement to apply annually will enable both the employee and General Manager to consider any changed circumstances and impacts on employment. |
5.24 |
Requiring Council staff to apply for annual approval for secondary employment in an approved format. |
This ensures consistency in applying and managing secondary employment across all areas of Council. |
6.3 |
Prohibiting Council staff from accepting gifts, benefits or hospitality from Council suppliers, including those using Council facilities. |
To make in explicit in the Code that accepting gifts, benefits or hospitality from suppliers and those using Council facilities is not accepted due to the perception that the supplier may receive favourable treatment in the future. |
6.7 |
Empowering the General Manager to determine how to dispose of surrendered gifts. |
The Code does not specify how surrendered gifts will be disposed of. This change will make it clear that the General Manager is responsible for disposing of surrendered gifts. |
6.7 |
Permitting Council to nominate a charity to receive surrendered gifts and benefits. |
This change will enable charities in the Inner West local government area to make use of the surrendered gifts and benefits for their charitable causes. Officers will request Council to nominate a charity to which any surrendered gifts may be provided. |
8.11 |
Imposing a clear desk requirement on Council staff to protect of Council’s information. |
Council’s ICT Acceptable Use Protocol includes a clear desk requirement, however, inclusion in the Code will make this an enforceable requirement. This provides a mechanism to ensure integrity and security of sensitive and confidential information. |
9.9 |
Clarifying that Code of Conduct complaints must be raised with 3 months. |
The Procedures for the Administration of the Model Code of Conduct specify that complaints under the Code must be made within 3 months of the occurrence of the conduct that forms the basis of the complaint, or the complainant becoming aware of the conduct. However, the Code does not clarify this timeframe.
As people may not be as familiar with the Procedures for the Administration of the Model Code of Conduct, this inclusion is intended to increase awareness. |
The draft Code of Conduct (Attachment 1) will be put on exhibition for 28 days. Submissions received in this time will be considered in preparing the final Code for Council’s consideration.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
1.⇩ |
Draft Model Code of Conduct |
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Councillor Expenses for 1 July 2024 to 31 December 2024
Prepared By: Julian Sakarai - Acting Senior Manager Governance and Risk
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to publicly table the provision of expenses and facilities to Councillors for the 1 July 2024 to 31 December 2024 period, in accordance with the adopted Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy.
BACKGROUND
Council’s Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy requires that Council report on the provision of expenses and facilities to Councillors publicly and that these reports include expenditure summarised by individual Councillor and as a total for all Councillors.
This report covers the expenditure relating to the provision of expenses and facilities to anyone who was a Councillor for the 1 July 2024 to 31 December 2024 period.
DISCUSSION
The provision of expenses being reported on are outlined below and align to the Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy adopted expenditure:
· General Travel Expenses
· Interstate, overseas and long-distance intrastate travel expenses
· Professional development including conferences and seminars
· ICT Expenses
· Carer expenses
· Home office expenses
· Greeting cards
There has been no expenditure that has exceeded the Councillors Expenses and Facilities Policy or adopted budget.
General travel |
Interstate, overseas travel |
Professional development conferences, seminars |
ICT expenses |
Carer expenses |
Home office expenses |
Greeting cards |
|
Mayor Byrne |
$512 |
|
$608 |
$112 |
|
|
|
Clr Antoniou |
|
$1,184 |
$292 |
$70 |
|
|
|
Clr Atkins |
$257 |
$1,610 |
$301 |
|
|
|
|
Clr Barlow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clr Blake |
|
|
|
$18 |
|
|
|
Clr Carlisle |
|
|
$455 |
|
|
|
|
Clr Clay |
$228 |
$850 |
$2,410 |
|
|
|
|
Clr D’Arienzo |
$121 |
|
$455 |
$164 |
|
|
|
Clr Fergusson |
|
|
$1,680 |
|
|
|
|
Deputy Mayor Howard |
$79 |
|
|
$147 |
|
|
|
Clr Macri |
|
|
$455 |
$65 |
|
|
|
Clr Raciti |
|
|
$455 |
$18 |
|
|
|
Clr Scott |
$46 |
|
$455 |
$152 |
|
|
|
Clr Smith |
|
|
|
$147 |
|
|
|
Clr Tastan |
|
|
$747 |
$18 |
|
|
|
Clr Da Cruz |
$63 |
$98 |
|
$328 |
|
$420 |
|
Clr Drury |
$55 |
$924 |
|
$529 |
|
$136 |
|
Clr Griffiths |
$666 |
$562 |
|
$136 |
|
|
|
Clr Langford |
|
$709 |
$1,859 |
$181 |
|
|
|
Clr Lockie |
$26 |
$788 |
$104 |
$142 |
|
|
|
Clr Shetty |
|
|
$59 |
$150 |
|
|
|
Clr Stamolis |
|
|
$53 |
$1,480 |
|
|
|
Clr Stephens |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clr Tsardoulias |
$51 |
|
|
$133 |
$493 |
|
|
Total combined Councillor actual expenses |
$2,104 |
$6,725
|
$10, 388
|
$3,990 |
$493 |
$556 |
Nil |
Adopted budget per Councillor per year |
$3,075 per Councillor
|
$15,375 Total for all Councillors |
$6,150 per Councillor
|
$3,690 per Councillor
$6,150 (Mayor) |
$9,000 per Councillor
|
$615 per Councillor |
$100 (Councillors)
$500 (Mayor) |
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the tabling of Councillor expenses.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Open space opportunities along rail corridors
Prepared By: Daniel East - Senior Manager Strategic Planning
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Council officers met with Lane Cove Council to discuss the delivery of the St Leonards South Masterplan rezoning and open space, including ownership / maintenance arrangements and key construction considerations. Lane Cove Council reported that the project is complex and expensive but on balance a positive asset for their community. This report finds there would need to be an initial engineering scoping assessment to explore the potential for new open space projects along rail corridors within the Inner West to understand the viability of this proposal.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 3 December 2024, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council investigate the opportunity to increase the provision of new open space in the Transport Oriented Development (TOD) precinct masterplans and contributions framework within the rail corridor to meet the needs of the existing community as well as future needs of the incoming population. A potential location for the Dulwich Hill open space zone is shown on the attached aerial photographs. As part of informing this investigation, the following consultation must be undertaken:
a. Consultation with the state government and TfNSW regarding feasibility analysis of a central green spine park above the rail corridor and potential funding arrangements for the project; and
b. consultation with representatives from Lane Cove Council on the delivery of the St Leonards South Masterplan rezoning and open space, including ownership / maintenance arrangements and key construction considerations.
2. That the findings be reported back to Council within 3 months of this Notice of Motion.
DISCUSSION
Providing new open spaces in densely built-up metropolitan areas is challenging however, as densities increase along transport corridors, it is relevant to investigate opportunities for new spaces for people to recreate and gather.
On 21 January 2025, planning officers of Inner West Council and Lane Cove Council met to discuss the planning and delivery of Wadangarri Park in St Leonards. This park is located on a bridge across the airspace of a railway corridor.
Case Study – Wadangarri Park, St Leonards
Wadangarri Park is located at 568 Pacific Highway, St Leonards, opposite the St Leonards train station. The park was built over the airspace above a heavy rail line providing a vital connection between the Crows Nests Centre (mixed use/commercial) to high-density residential suburb of St Leonards South precincts. The park is connected to a shopping mall which includes the new St Leonards Library, retail, public toilets and a 300-space public basement car park. The park was fully opened to the public on 15 September 2023.
Figure 1: Image of the “Banksia” inspired playground in the Wadangarri Park (the Aboriginal name for the Banksia flower), in the 4,750sqm park.
Planning Process
The original concept for Wadangarri Park was first identified in the 2006 Open Space Strategy to plan for St Leonards, jointly prepared by Lane Cove, North Sydney and Willoughby councils. For many years, Lane Cove Council approached Transport Asset Holding Entity (TAHE) NSW, as the asset owner of the NSW heavy rail corridor, seeking to discuss arrangements that would allow the project to commence. Lane Cove Council were able to commence the construction of the bridge in 2021.
Figure 2 below demonstrates the scale of density needed to facilitate to fund the project. In the immediate area surrounding Wadangarri Park there are seven sites that facilitate 4,500 new dwellings, 37,000sqm of commercial GFA, with towers up to 43 storeys.
Figure 2: Extract from the St Leonards South Planning Proposal (2018) that demonstrates the magnitude of development occurring in the immediate vicinity of the (then) proposed park.
Table 1: Provides the legend to Figure 2 above of development density of each of the red line areas.
Site No. |
Description of development |
1a |
8 storey tower accommodating 105sqm retail and 66 new dwellings |
1b |
5 & 29 storey tower accommodating 290sqm commercial space and 269 dwellings |
2 |
The location of Wadangarri Park and Plaza. |
3a |
10 storey commercial tower 17,000sqm GFA |
3b |
Two 29 & 43 storey towers accommodating 700 dwellings, 1000sqm supermarket, 1000sqm public library, and 4,796sqm retail. |
4 |
43 storey tower accommodating 5,628sqm commercial and 495 dwellings |
5 |
27 & 37 storey towers accommodating 8,263sqm commercial and 539 dwellings. |
6 |
Planning Proposal for St Leonards South facilitating approximately 2,400 new dwellings for a mix of 6-11 storey buildings. |
This scale of density is unlikely to be facilitated in the Inner West. The significant construction costs would necessitate State and/or Commonwealth support in conjunction with Council.
Costs, Asset Ownership and Maintenance of Wadangarri Park
The total cost of Wadangarri Park is publicly stated at approximately $50million, with Planning Agreements providing $46million with a $4.75million grant from the NSW Government under the Public Spaces Legacy Program.
The structure asset of Wadangarri Park is owned by Lane Cove Council and is burdened with the lifecycle and maintenance costs of all infrastructure above the rail corridor, but not any infrastructure relating to the rail operations. A lease agreement was entered for the airspace over the rail corridor with the NSW Government for $1 per annum for a period of 67years, expiring in 2088.
Lane Cove staff did not provide a QS statement however simple analysis based on the 4,750sqm of open space at the $50M the cost per sqm of the park is loosely estimated to be $10,500 (sqm).
The per square metre cost of purchasing land at market value in the Inner West is significantly less expensive than the per sqm cost of Wadangarri Park.
Construction Considerations Wadangarri Park
Wadangarri Park in St Leonards was developed through the collaborative efforts of several key engineering and design firms, including:
· Arenco (NSW) was the builder for the project, overseeing the construction of the park.
· Aurecon provided the engineering design services and planning.
· Arcadia Landscape Architecture designed the landscape architecture tailored to St Leonards characteristics
· Solutions + Co designed, engineered, fabricated, and constructed the multi-level, multi-zoned playground within the park.
Key construction considerations for the structure included:
· A robust engineering structural design to support the park’s features without compromising rail operations. This includes the preparation of collision and derailment studies and risks assessments; adjustments to overhead wiring structures; tunnel fire safety considerations with complex emergency services at track level, and vehicle tracking and liaison with Fire and Rescue NSW, Ausgrid, Telstra and Sydney Water.
· The use of 31 precast Super-T girders, each weighing 60 tons, to form a 3,000sqm connected bridge. The installation required careful planning to minimize disruptions to train services. This included using one of the largest cranes in the world which had to be booked 12 months in advance.
· The reticulation of services was a challenge, this included drainage, irrigation, communications, power and lighting, and security.
A preliminary feasibility study conducted by a qualified engineering professional is required I order to understand the viability of this proposal for the Inner West. Such a preliminary study would provide an analysis of the opportunities and costs to maximise community benefits and to maximise the effectiveness of future advocacy efforts.
Assumptions regarding Construction Considerations within Inner West
Wadangarri Park was constructed over two sets of adjacent rail way tracks that run more or less north / south. While the rail corridor width at Dulwich Hill is similar to the Lane Cove example, with a similar typology, there are 4 railway lines which is likely to increase the complexity of construction and therefore cost. The rail corridor width at Ashfield is approximately double that of Lane Cove, with the typology differences locating the railway corridor above flood planning levels. This would have a significant impact on the cost estimate.
Conclusion
In the event open spaced over rail lines was pursued either at Dulwich Hill or Ashfield it appears the cost would be significantly greater due to the complexity created by the additional rail lines in comparison to Lane Cove. In order to identify the parameters around cost and complexity an engineering scoping assessment to explore the potential for new open space projects along rail corridors within the Inner West is required to understand the viability of this proposal.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with this report.
Nil.
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Draft Promotional Plan for the Inner West Sustainability Hub 2025
Prepared By: Luke Murtas - Senior Manager Environment and Sustainability
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
1: An ecologically sustainable Inner West 5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Inner West Sustainability Hub was opened on 1 July 2023.
Tenants include The Bower, Re:Place and Dress for Success as well as Council’s Green Living Centre.
The site does not have a significant street presence and community awareness about its physical location is limited. In addition, a core theme of the Hub is reuse and recycling and the building itself is a re-purposed Council depot, however, due in part to the site still retaining the physical character of a former Council depot, it “lacks a friendly, community reuse vibe”.
Many people who do attend the site attend for one-off engagements of short duration despite the range of services and programs offered, and so an identified challenge is to increase both the appeal and “dwell time” at the Hub. A strong communications and promotional plan for the Hub will be key to improving this outcome.
Council and tenants are collaborating to develop a communications and engagement plan for 2025 and hold working bees to improve the on-site vibe.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 3 December 2024, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council postpone the Circular Economy Round Table (scheduled for Monday 9 December) to be held in January 2025 instead and incorporate into the agenda of that forum a consultation on a promotional plan for the Sustainability Hub in 2025.
2. That Council table a report for the February 2025 Ordinary Council Meeting with a draft promotional plan for the Sustainability Hub in 2025, incorporating feedback from the tenants as well as other relevant organisations. This should include consideration of a budget allocation for communications, promotion, and events to be developed in consultation with these organisations, and a plan to increase signage and wayfinding to the Hub.
3. That Council identify a senior officer to be the primary point of contact for tenants at the Sustainability Hub and the coordinator of Council’s oversight of the Hub. This is to be addressed in the report to the February 2025 Ordinary Council Meeting.
DISCUSSION
Current Hub Program
Since its launch in July 2023, activities and engagements at the Hub have included:
· A launch event attended by 1,000+ Inner West residents and visitors
· Assistance to over 2,000 disadvantaged women through Dress for Success
· Public EV charging opened on site in 2025 and is currently free
· Events and programs which promote recycling, reuse and repair of household goods:
o Community reuse markets with over 1,000 residents attending
o Re:Place reused and repurposed fashion stall
o Problem waste drop-off events
o A new tool library based on share economy principles
o Children’s toy swaps
· Workshops and engagements focussed on reduced costs of living and healthier, more sustainable homes and social engagement in workshops and community projects:
o Weekly workshops on energy efficiency and reducing home power bills
o Bicycle repair and active transport workshops
o Workshops and seminars on sustainable cooking and gardening
· More efficient use of resources and innovative ways to build, work and grow food:
o A thriving demonstration garden
o Bower “tiny house” program
· The House-to-Home program run by The Bower which supplies furniture and appliances to disadvantaged households
· The Bower have saved over 15,000kg from going to landfill, through electronics, bike and furniture repairs and “the Bower Boutique”
Information on these activities has been promoted through Council’s traditional channels including Council’s website and newsletter, Environmental e-news and social media. Council’s community partners also promote their own activities and events at the Hub through their own channels and social media.
Attendance and Target Market
People who attend the Hub tend to be there for one purpose, and for a relatively short period of time, despite the range of services and programs offered. A key challenge for the Environment and Sustainability service is to increase both the sectoral appeal and “dwell time” at the Hub. Part of the next phase of growth and a focus of the draft comms plan will be to create an environment of cross-collaboration by tenants and Council under a unified site brand.
Given the quality of offering and diversity of programs at the Hub and their appeal to attendees, there is the potential to leverage and convert many of the current attendances into longer stays by encouraging cross-promotion, deeper partnerships and engagement. Shared comms, community events and coupled/ cross-promoted programs will assist with this objective.
The Hub is becoming more activated over time with daily engagements, EV charging and a wider variety of programs on offer, meaning there is the potential to link participants who are already at the site with an additional sustainability activity. In addition, the draft comms plan identifies ways to attract new attendees to the Hub through physical beautification of the site, local awareness campaigns and online advertising.
An identified market to develop for the Hub arising from Council’s working group is low-income households, renters and residents affected by cost-of-living issues. In addition, the Hub’s programs do not have significant engagement with school aged children in the Inner West.
Activations and promotions to date at the Hub have made provision for these groups but not made significant cut-through and so a key objective of the comms plan will be to reach these key markets. Opportunities to collaborate with Hub tenants in their own campaigns should also form part of the plan in this respect, as well as using Council’s network of local democracy groups and other ways to connect with key markets such as libraries and seniors services.
Circular Economy Roundtable
The Circular Economy Roundtable planned for 9 December 2024 was postponed and a suitable date will be determined shortly. The draft communications plan, discussed in detail below, will be tabled for discussion at the roundtable with the various experts in attendance at the roundtable for their input, in line with Council’s resolution.
Inner West Sustainability Hub – Communications Plan
A meeting at the Sustainability Hub was held on 19 December 2024 with tenants The Bower, Re:Place as well as Council’s Green Living Centre, with Dress for Success providing input pre-meeting. Council Environment and Comms officers attended. Dress for Success require a lower level of “promotional activity” to support their clients.
Discussions and ideas were generated around Hub promotional needs including:
· Location - Increasing awareness of site location through directional signage, maps and online communications
· Directions - Improving street signage on Prospect Road to make the entry area more obvious and inviting
· On-site wayfinding – A mural map near the entry point and colour-coded directional/ wayfinding signage to each tenancy. Safety signage (toilets, exits, shared areas etc.)
· Place-making – creating the community reuse vibe with plantings, murals, creative workshops, working bees, sustainability and reuse in practice and themed events
· Site activation – allow access for external like-minded community groups (room booking and specified reuse focus criteria), EV charging
· Communications – cross promotion and sharing IWSH related posts by one another, webpage and socials for the hub, council website info and socials, printed flyers, posters and business cards for council customer service stalls and venues to promote
Initial consultation has highlighted that a key challenge for residents is locating the Hub. Developing a strong signage, wayfinding and beautification plan is recommended to be incorporated into the comms and promotional plan to address this fundamental issue.
It is also recommended to create a strong branding for the Hub which can be consistently applied to communications and advertising to provide a recognisable identity in the community in a similar fashion to organisations such as Reverse Garbage.
Communications Plan
A snapshot of the communications plan is in the table below with indicative costs.
Concern |
Activity |
Team |
Budget |
Location/Awareness |
Street signs on posts |
$1000 |
$1000 |
Street banner |
Comms |
$1000 |
|
Digital map and QR code |
Comms |
In-house |
|
Postcard letterbox drop |
Comms/ E&S |
In-house |
|
Site vibe |
Mural (paint and artist) |
Comms/The Bower |
$2,000 |
Paid ads to promote site and mural |
Comms |
$250 |
|
Signage at front of site |
Comms/Properties |
$500 |
|
Site map inside site entry |
Comms/ Environment team /Tenants |
$1000 |
|
Onsite wayfinding |
Environment team/ Tenants |
$500 |
|
IWSH branding and templates |
Comms |
In-house |
|
Video walkthrough, social posts and promote events |
Comms |
$250 |
|
Working bees catering and materials to improve site |
Environment team |
$1000 |
|
Activation |
GLC training room hire booking system |
Environment team/ Facilities |
TBC |
EV charging – signage, safety, auto shut off |
Environment team/ Properties |
$1000 |
|
Total: |
$10,500 |
A follow up meeting was then held on site on Wednesday 22 January 2025 to discuss the draft Comms and engagement plan (refer to Attachment 1).
The Inner West Sustainability sub-brand is being developed by Inner West in collaboration with tenants and will be discussed with tenants by early March. The Green Living Centre has some corporate sustainability branding which is used for engagement and events such as the Footprints Festival.
Senior Officer – Point of Contact
The Senior Manager Environment and Sustainability will be the principal contact for the Inner West Sustainability Hub.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
As noted above, the estimated costs to implement the communications plan is $10,500 and will be considered as part of the Draft 2025/26 budget planning.
1.⇩ |
Draft IWC Hub Promotional and Comms Plan |
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Review of Opportunities for EV Public Charging in Tempe Reserve and Balmain Depot
Prepared By: Manod Wickramasinghe - Traffic and Transport Planning Manager
Authorised By: Ryann Midei - Director Infrastructure
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report provides information regarding EV charging opportunities at Tempe Reserve and the potential establishment of a public charging hub as part of Balmain Depot.
Council’s current approach for the delivery of EV charging within carparks is via a partnership model with EV charging providers installing infrastructure which is funded by the provider/ state government grants.
The partnership model provides benefits to Council by reducing costs and leveraging the expertise of EV charging providers. The providers are tasked with installing, operating and maintaining the EV chargers at no cost to Council. The providers are also at the forefront of EV charging technology, allowing greater responsiveness to changing technology needs and leveraging the data they collect from use of their charging networks.
In addition, it should be noted that after Round 1 of the NSW EV Kerbside Grant, councils are not eligible to apply directly for subsequent rounds of funding. Council’s partnership model however, allows for EV charging partners to continue to apply for funding
In relation to Tempe Reserve:
· Council’s application for the state government’s Round One kerbside public charging grants, included several locations for EV public charging in the Tempe-Sydenham area. While Council was successful in obtaining grants for 136 charging ports, the Tempe-Sydenham sites we're not successful in attracting funding;
· Council’s Request for Quotation to provide charging in its car parks could not include Tempe Reserve, as the Reserve’s existing Plan of Management (PoM) does not permit EV charging. A new PoM is currently being prepared which will include the opportunity for EV charging.
· While there are some power grid constraints near Tempe Reserve, Council has included several adjacent sites (that do not have grid constraints) in its Round Two funding applications.
· It is anticipated that Round 2 funding announcements will be made by the state government early in the second half of 2025.
· Additionally, once the new PoM has been adopted, Council intends to include Tempe Reserve in the next stage of its car park charging program, currently programmed to commence in the second half of 2026.
In relation to the proposed Balmain Depot public charging hub:
· The site was included in Council’s car park EV charging Request for Quotation.
· Origin Energy have been appointed as the partner provider, to install approximately 10 public charging ports adjacent to the Llewellyn Street entrance to the Depot;
· Design of the depot EV charging will commence in the second half of 2025, including preparation of a business case.
· It is estimated that the project could be completed by early 2026 including design, procurement and construction of required changes to the depot and installation of EV charging infrastructure.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 3 December 2024, Council resolved the following in part:
2. That Council report back by February 2025 about the feasibility, costs and timeline of potential works to upgrade power at Tempe Reserve to facilitate the installation of electric vehicle chargers in this location….
At the Council meeting held on 21 November 2023, Council resolved the following in part:
2. That Council incorporate Balmain Depot as a proposed location for electric vehicle charging in current procurements processes and in the exploration of opportunities with AUSGRID group.
This report details experiences with providing EV public charging within, and adjacent to, Tempe Reserve, as well as an update on progress with the proposed Balmain Depot public charging hub.
DISCUSSION
Council’s current approach for the delivery of EV charging within carparks is via a partnership model with EV charging providers installing infrastructure which is funded by the provider/ state government grants.
The partnership model provides benefits to Council by reducing costs and leveraging the expertise of EV charging providers. The providers are tasked with installing, operating and maintaining the EV chargers at no cost to Council. The providers are also at the forefront of EV charging technology, allowing greater responsiveness to changing technology needs and leveraging the data they collect from use of their charging networks.
In addition, it should be noted that after Round 1 of the NSW EV Kerbside Grant, councils are not eligible to apply directly for subsequent rounds of funding. Council’s partnership model however, allows for EV charging partners to continue to apply for funding.
Tempe Reserve
Council’s investigations into constraints associated with the installation of EV public charging in Tempe Reserve have indicated the following:
· Applications for Round One of the State Government’s Kerbside Public Charging Grants excluded Tempe Reserve because the grants were only available for kerbside charging. Power grid capacity issues were not experienced within Tempe Reserve.
· Kerbside locations in Holbeach Road were considered for the Round One grant applications, however Ausgrid advised that there were power grid constraints between Princes Highway and the Tempe Reserve boundary.
· When Holbeach Road, within Tempe Reserve was considered, it was found that this portion of roadway was within the existing parks Plan of Management (PoM) and that the PoM did not permit third party EV charging.
Council’s application for the state governments’ Round One kerbside public charging grants included several locations for EV public charging in the Tempe-Sydenham area. While Council were successful in obtaining grants for 136 charging ports, the Tempe-Sydenham sites were not successful in attracting funding because the area was not identified as a priority area, under Round 1 of the state funding.
At the time of Council’s RfQ for public charging in Council car parks; limitations placed on third party charging by Tempe Reserve’s PoM excluded consideration of Tempe Reserve car parks.
Since the time of the Round One applications and Council’s car park charging RfQ, several circumstances have changed, or are in the process of changing. In this regard:
· The State Government’s grant criteria has changed and now includes the Sydenham-Tempe-St Peters in its priority areas.
· Changes to the PoM will permit Tempe Reserve car parks to be included in future grant applications.
It’s worth noting that the exhibition of the PoM is expected in the second half of 2025.
Based on discussions with the State Government, Council’s charging partners and Ausgrid, it is considered that the most efficient way to provide charging in Tempe Reserve is to include Tempe Reserve in future stages of Council’s car park charging program once the revised PoM has been adopted.
Additionally, based on the State’s new grant criteria, Council’s partners have included several sites in Tempe and Sydenham as part of their Round Two kerbside grant applications. It is anticipated that Round 2 funding announcements will be made by the state government early in the second half of 2025. Installation of successful Round Two sites would commence early in 2026.
Currently, 11 public charging ports are available near Tempe Reserve, including:
· 3 in Arncliffe Street, Wolli Creek;
· 6 at IKEA;
· 1 at BP, Princes Highway, Sydenham;
· 1 in Terry Street.
Next Steps:
· Council has included several nearby sites in its Round Two grant application and will work with its partners to commence installation of successful sites early in 2026.
· Subject to the Tempe Reserve’s PoM being adopted, Council will include Tempe Reserve in the next stage of its car park charging program, aimed at commencing in the second half of 2026.
Balmain Depot:
The proposal to include a 10-port public charging hub in Balmain Depot was incorporated into Council’s car park charging RfQ. Review of the RfQ responses has been completed and the following 2 charging partners chosen:
EVIE will provide public chargers in the following car parks:
· Barclay Street, Marrickville;
· Beattie Street, Balmain;
· Leichhardt Town Hall, Leichhardt;
· Lennox Street/Church Street, Newtown.
Origin Energy will provide public chargers in the following car parks, as well as working with Council to create the Balmain Depot Public Charging Hub:
· Ashfield Aquatic Centre;
· Bedford Crescent, Dulwich Hill;
· Charles Street, Petersham;
· Federal Place, Haberfield;
· Fisher Street, Petersham;
· Haberfield Centre, Haberfield
· Hamilton Street, Rozelle;
· Merton Street (east), Rozelle;
· Summer Hill.
Planning regarding the Balmain Depot Hub has initiated and have indicated that the project is extremely complex; requiring many of the assets in the depot to be adjusted, relocated and/or rebuilt. The redesign also requires safe separation of the public charging area from the operational sections of the depot.
Additionally, the primary power source is on the northern side of the site and will require significant power to extend the full length of the depot to its Llewellyn Street frontage, where the charging hub is proposed.
Consequently, while the project is progressing, it is a complex, which will require a redesign of at least part of the depot.
It is estimated that the project could be completed by early 2026 including design, procurement and construction of required changes to the depot and installation of EV charging infrastructure.
To assist in the interim, Council has been working with its partners to ensure the availability of public charging with 136 kerbside public charging ports being installed across the Inner West. Of these ports; there are 16 public charging ports in the Balmain/Birchgrove/Rozelle area.
Next Steps:
· Design of the depot recharging will commence in the second half of 2025, including preparation of a business case.
· Costings will be considered as part of the design process.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Under Council’s partnership model, there are no capital costs to Council associated with the implementation of the proposed public EV chargers. However, the Balmain Depot charging and associated works will require Council funding to be allocated with costs to be determine through the design process.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Mandatory Reporting to Council of Report received from Fire & Rescue NSW - 1 Brown Street Ashfield
Prepared By: Michael Ryan - Senior Manager, Health & Building
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Correspondence was received from Fire & Rescue NSW (Attachment 1) identified fire safety matters in relation to 1 Brown Street Ashfield. Following an inspection of the premises by Council’s Senior Fire Safety Officer, it was determined that a Notice of Intention to serve a Development Control Order was warranted.
This will require either the installation or modification to the existing fire safety measures in the building to ensure adequate provision for fire safety and awareness. These works are able to be undertaken in accordance with State Planning provisions through the issuing of a Development Control Order under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPAA).
BACKGROUND
1 Brown Street Ashfield – Residential Flat Building
Fire and Rescue NSW (FRNSW) advised Inner West Council on 12 September 2024 of an inspection they undertook in response to a complaint regarding concerns with the adequacy of the provision for the fire safety at the premises, including:
· Concerns that the hydrant booster assembly’s current location was not readily identifiable due to fencing and vegetation, was not adequately fire separated from the building and notice of pressure signage had not been provided.
· The doors leading to the hydrant pumproom and sprinkler valves were not fitted with locks compatible with a FRNSW access key (003)
· The sprinkler booster assembly had connections that were not clearly marked with signage, and the maximum allowable inlet pressure at the connection was not clearly marked.
· The exit and directional exit signage was not adequate within the car park levels
· A current copy of the Annual Fire Safety Statement (AFSS) for the building was not displayed in a prominent location
DISCUSSION
In accordance with the provisions of the EPAA, FRNSW referred the matter to Council for follow up. In response, Council’s Fire Safety Team conducted an inspection of the premises as per below table:
Property |
Inspection Result |
1 Brown Street Ashfield |
An inspection was conducted on 29 January 2025 which revealed:
- The booster assembly’s location was not readily identifiable - The doors leading to the hydrant pumproom and sprinkler valves were fitted with locks that were not compatible with a FRNSW - Signage had not been provided to the sprinkler booster assembly identifying the connections and the maximum allowable inlet pressure. - Exit signage was within the carpark levels not adequate - The AFSS had been displayed in the building’s foyer since the inspection and report from FRNSW
Following on from the site inspection, discussions were held with FRNSW with regards to their expectations, particularly with regards to the fire separation of the hydrant booster assembly. If they required full compliance for the booster to be functional for their application, it would have required extensive works and costs. FRNSW were satisfied that if the other issues highlighted in their inspection report, were addressed that full compliance with this particular issue (Fire separation), would not be required in this circumstance.
Direction: (EPA/2025/0015) A fire Safety Notice of Intention to serve a Development Control Order was issued on 4 February 2025, requiring certain works to be undertaken in keeping with the comments from FRNSW in their letter dated 13 December 2025 as well as the findings from Council’s inspection of the premises on 29 January 2025. |
Table above summarises the actions by Council officers since receiving the FRNSW report.
After all fire safety solutions are implemented, a Fire Safety Certificate is to be submitted to Council, which will conclude the matter.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
1.⇩ |
Fire & Rescue NSW Referral - 1 Brown Street Ashfield |
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Boarding House - Grant Opportunities
Prepared By: Michael Ryan - Senior Manager, Health & Building
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
At Council’s December 2024 meeting, it was resolved that, ‘Council investigate potential grant or additional support opportunities that the Boarding House Inspection Program could undertake to help boarding houses in the Inner West reach and maintain compliance. This report is to be brought to Council for the March 2025 meeting’.
Investigations by officers including Council’s Grants Officer and Boarding House Specialist have not identified any available grant opportunities. Enquiries were also made with peer Councils in relation to potential grant opportunities however these enquiries did not identify any available funding.
However other forms of support are provided directly to vulnerable boarding house residents. This report outlines the existing boarding house compliance program and the way Inner West and other agencies provides support.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 3 December 2024, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council receive and note the report.
2. That Council investigate potential grant or additional support opportunities that the Boarding House Inspection Program could undertake to help boarding houses in the Inner West reach and maintain compliance. This report is to be brought to Council for the March 2025 meeting.
There are 316 Boarding Houses within the Inner West Council area. Council has developed a boarding house inspection program and has allocated a permanent staff member to resource the annual inspection of each boarding house. Where required other specialist staff assist.
DISCUSSION
Investigations by Council staff could not identify grant opportunities to help Boarding Houses in the Inner West reach and maintain compliance. No grant programs were identified to assist boarding house proprietors – most likely because they are private accommodation and privately owned. Whilst it is recognised that many residents of boarding houses in the Inner West are vulnerable people such as those living with mental illness, drug and alcohol misuse and other chronic conditions, NSW Government funding goes toward supporting these individuals through publicly funded human services delivery for individuals.
For example, the Inner West Community Directorate works with local not for profits through the Homelessness Collaboration and organisations like the Newtown Neighbourhood Centre (NNC). The NNC receives funding from the NSW Department of Communities and Justice to provide outreach services to boarding house residents. After the Probert St fire in 2022, NNC provided emergency clothing, food and linked people with emergency accommodation using funding provided by the Department of Community Justice. The Sydney Local Health District also provides outreach to people living in boarding houses through its community health programs and particularly during Covid ran a number of outreach health clinics.
To ensure compliance with health and safety standards, Council has developed and implemented a Boarding House Inspection program guideline to ensure the fundamental safety of vulnerable residents in boarding house accommodation.
The purpose of this inspection program is to ensure residents have acceptable and safe living conditions by ensuring compliance with planning, building, public health and fire safety regulations. To support this function, Council keeps an updated register of all known shared accommodation premises detailing property ownership, contact information for the owner, on-site caretakers, managing agents, building classifications and relevant approvals.
Inspections are undertaken annually by specialist staff well versed in a range of areas including fire safety provisions, public health, light and ventilation and the kitchen, laundry and bathroom facilities. The program has adopted a persistent but educative approach to bring premises into compliance.
The inspections are documented on standard checklists to ensure the relevant matters are taken into consideration. All inspections are undertaken in the company of owners or representatives of the owners.
Should any resident be identified as in need of medical assistance during an inspection, coordination with local outreach programs to provide necessary support occurs.
The ongoing implementation of this program is crucial for maintaining the rights, safety and living conditions of boarding house residents with continued backing from relevant agencies.
Council also participates in a boarding house collaboration group that meets quarterly to discuss local boarding house matters and relevant updates. The group includes both council officers and the Newtown Neighbourhood Centre. These forums are undertaken on a quarterly basis.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Love Your Club Update
Prepared By: Simon Watts - Social and Cultural Planning Manager
Authorised By: Ruth Callaghan - Director Community
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Council has resolved to create the Love Your Club program and the Inner West Small Clubs Network, an alliance for sharing ideas and resources aimed at creating greater sustainability for local small clubs and to assist them in moving away from a reliance on poker machine gambling.
Interviews and visits to the affected clubs commenced in early February 2025. Leichhardt Bowling Club, Petersham Bowling Club, Portuguese Club Sydenham, Marrickville Golf Club, and Marrickville Hardcourt Tennis Club were the first clubs interviewed.
Initial interviews with these five clubs indicate strong support for Council’s initiative, and a broad range of areas in which Council and the clubs might work together to build their sustainability.
The interviews continue and the survey launched on 26 February 2025. Once data from the interviews and survey are complete, the first meeting of the network will be planned.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 3 December 2024, Council resolved the following (in part):
1. That Council endorse the proposed Love Your Club program including the establishment of the Inner West Small Clubs Network.
5. That Council receive a report back on the above initiatives to the March 2025 Council meeting.
DISCUSSION
The feedback from the initial clubs interviewed has been very positive. Club representatives strongly support Council’s initiative and have proposed many areas of possible work, collaboration and sharing of expertise for the Network to consider including:
· Advice on asset maintenance and development including buildings, children’s playgrounds, roofs and air-conditioning
· Advice on solar power and lighting audit/upgrades
· Disability access upgrades
· Entertainment approvals and managing noise complaints
· Financial health checks
· Grant search and grant writing
· Human resource management advice
· Playing green and course management including outsourcing and leading practice training for green management staff
· Procurement advice including for example the idea of group purchasing of beer and telecommunications
· Trading hours extensions
· Volunteer management training for a variety of club and member support roles.
Several clubs have reported receiving support from Clubs NSW and/or from peak sporting organisations including human resource advice, green keeping advice, and management of playing greens to competition standards.
Overall, interviewees have expressed a strong interest in participating in the network and exchanging entrepreneurial ideas and expertise for building sustainability for their clubs.
The initial meeting of the network will be scheduled once the interviews are complete, and the survey results have been analysed. The data will be used to identify key topics of interest for the first network meeting which is anticipated to be by June 2025.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Leichhardt Oval Refurbishment Update
Prepared By: Scott Mullen - Strategic Investments and Property Manager
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport 4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
This report provides an update on key activities and milestones for the period from February 2025.
Key highlights include:
· Approval for the engagement of Quantity Surveyor for costing of the Concept Design
· Issue of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the engagement of Surveyor Cloud Point Survey
· Engagement of an arborist to undertake a survey of the large fig trees at the northern end of the oval.
BACKGROUND
Council adopted the Leichhardt Oval Masterplan at the 10 October 2023 Council meeting following public exhibition and significant public engagement.
The Commonwealth, State and Local Governments have formed a funding partnership to secure the future of Leichhardt Oval. The Commonwealth is committing $20 million to the project, with the NSW Government and the Inner West Council investing $10 million each towards the upgrade.
At the Council meeting held on 3 December 2024, Council resolved the following in part:
2. That Council report back at each meeting on the progress of the Leichhardt Oval refurbishment including progress against the budget, project milestones, and reporting on risks.
At the Council meeting held on 18 February 2025, Council resolved the following:
That Council bring forward the finalisation of the concept design program and concept plans by Cox Architecture to the April 2025 Council meeting.
DISCUSSION
Key activities undertaken in February include:
· Project Control Group (PCG) - second meeting occurred on 20 February 2025
· EY working with Cox to map out its program, deliverables and key milestones.
· Approval for the engagement of Quantity Surveyor for costing of the Concept Design
· Issue of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the engagement of Surveyor Cloud Point Survey
· Engagement of an arborist to undertake a survey of the large fig trees at the northern end of the oval
· Project Management Plan (PMP) prepared.
Key activities for March include:
· Concept Design development by COX with input from the Quantity Surveyor.
· Procurement of additional information requested by Cox (point cloud survey, arborist report).
· Cox meeting with Venues Live, the new catering contractor.
· Engagement of Project Assurance Consultant.
Major Risks Requiring Attention
· Project components triggering need for extensive BCA and access upgrade
· Planning pathways and potential consent conditions requiring additional work.
Issues/Change Affecting Progress/Budget:
· Decision on project scope needed by 31 May 2025 to move on to ECI procurement
· Scope confirmation to align with finite budget.
Principal Design Consultant – Concept Design
COX Architecture (COX) have been progressing the investigation of both the priority options, as well as the other concepts that council has requested to be developed and costed.
Quantity Surveyor
Rider Levett Bucknall (RLB) has been engaged by Council as an independent Quantity Surveyor (QS) to assist with the prioritisation on how to achieve best value-for-money and improved facilities for Leichhardt Oval.
RLB has significant experience in consulting on major sporting projects within NSW including:
· Heffron Centre, community sporting facility - $58m / 2020.
· Concord Oval, green open spaces, indoor recreation centre (gym, multipurpose sports courts and group fitness rooms) - $70m / 2022.
· Cricket NSW Centre of Excellence, indoor training facilities, outdoor wickets and oval) - confidential / in progress, with completion due 2025.
Programme
The following programme has been agreed with Ernst & Young (EY) and COX for the delivery of the Concept Designs. The programme remains unchanged from the 18 February 2025 report with the below actions updated:
• January 2025
- Appointment of PDC, mobilisation, start-up meeting (Completed)
• February 2025
- Discovery, site investigation, review of surveys, stakeholder discussions, early Concept Design exploration (Completed)
- Development of Concept Design options (Completed)
• March 2025
- Development of Concept Design options including presentation to Council/EY
- Finalisation of Concept Designs and concurrent costing
• April 2025
- Concept Design costing and review
- Value Engineering of Concept options as required
• May 2025
- Re-costing of VE options and finalisation as required, and presentation to IEC/EY
The following key milestones have been agreed with EY and COX:
• Friday 4 April 2025
- Presentation of Concept Designs and costings of the various components to IWC
- Obtain IWC feedback, and discuss prioritisation and focus of value engineering exercise
• Wednesday 21 May 2025
- Presentation of value-engineered Concept Designs and revised costings to IWC
- Discussions on recommended project scope to deliver best ‘value-for-money’ and ‘bang-for-buck’.
Project Management Activities
Weekly meetings between Council staff and EY are ongoing to review project progress, discuss risks and mitigation strategies, assess governance and financials, and monitor timelines and upcoming activities.
EY have prepared a Project Management Plan and are issuing detailed monthly PCG reports, providing comprehensive updates on the project’s progress, identified risks, and overall assurance status.
This report will also be presented and reviewed at the Major Capital Project Committee Meetings, where it serves as a basis for discussions on project performance, risk management, and future planning.
Project Assurance Activities
An RFQ has been issued to engage a Project Assurance Consultant for Stages 1 and 2 to ensure project integrity and risk management. Their duties will include reviewing performance, costs, and timelines, providing improvement recommendations, and preparing monthly reports for the Inner West Council Major Capital Projects Committee.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Petersham Town Hall Creative Hub EOI
Prepared By: Scott Mullen - Strategic Investments and Property Manager
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
3: Creative communities and a strong economy |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In the 3 December 2024 Council meeting, Council provided an update on the Expression of Interest (EOI) on the Petersham Town Hall Creative Hub EOI. From this meeting, it was resolved that:
2. That Council staff report to the March 2025 Council meeting with a recommendation for a license agreement with the successful applicant.
This report provides an update on the successful license agreements provided to applicants.
BACKGROUND
The implementation of the Creative Use of Council Venues Pilot Program (Pilot Program) is part of the initiatives set out in the Arts and Music Recovery Plan, endorsed by Council in May 2023.
Inner West Council is committed to creative spaces and is giving creatives more access to Council venues. To support this initiative, Council has established the Petersham Creative, a hub for organisations wishing to use Petersham Town Hall for the administration of creative activities.
Petersham Creative enables the arts, cultural and creative sectors to further their develop their production of live music and performance events and provide opportunities for increased collaborations, strengthening their capacity to contribute to the Inner West's rich cultural and creative life.
DISCUSSION
Expression of Interest process
As part of the program to activate Council’s Town Halls, an EOI for Petersham Town Hall was established for individuals and organisations wishing to use the town hall for the administration of creative activities.
The proposal
Applicants were asked to provide details of their proposal, including, but not limited to the following:
· How the organisation would utilise one or more of Council's venues for creative use(s)
· What benefits would they bring to the Inner West community
· Key performance indicators that could demonstrate the benefit and be used by Council to further understand how creatives contribute to the community
· Annual reporting requirements.
EOI EVALUATION
Council received 13 submissions which were evaluated against the criteria outlined above. Council staff shortlisted a number of organisations that met the criteria outlined in the EOI to continue negotiations for a licence for one or more of the spaces available in Petersham Town Hall.
Licence and fee
The spaces have been offered as a licence, for a two-year term. The fee was negotiated with reference to Council's Land and Property Policy.
All organisations were asked to provide further detail on their organisation, including curriculum vitae, management model and board structure, previous achievements, annual report, and a description on how they will make use of Council’s venues and the benefits that they will provide to the community more broadly.
The negotiations with the shortlisted organisations included:
· the allocation of the available spaces between the organisations, and
· negotiation of the licence and fee.
OUTCOMES
Several applicants were assessed and found to meet the criteria in the EOI as not-for-profit creative organisations that will use the space for the administration of creative arts.
As a result of the EOI process to date, two-year licences have been approved and issued to:
· Queer Screen
· Box of Birds / Stalker Theatre
· Inner West Film Festival
Further information
Queer Screen
Queer Screen facilitate the effective planning and execution of two annual film festivals: the Mardi Gras Film Festival and Queer Screen Film Festival across various venues in Sydney, including the inner west Inner West Film Festival (See www.queerscreen.org.au).
Queer Screen’s vision is a celebration of the diversity of sexualities and gender identities through queer storytelling on screen, by inclusive and respectful communities full of creativity, inspiration and pride.
Inner West Film Festival
In partnership with Inner West Council, Inner West Film Festival Inc. facilitate the effective planning and execution of the annual Inner West including the Leichhardt Town Hall with films at Dendy Newtown, Palace Norton and Marrickville Golf Club and events at Actors Centre Australia (Italian Forum on Norton Street).
The purpose of the festival showcases Inner West filmmakers and to celebrate the unique place of the Inner West in the history of Australian Film (See www.innerwestfilmfest.com.au).
Box of Birds / Stalker Theatre
Stalker Theatre make high quality physical and visual productions from large site-specific outdoor theatre works to both intimate and largescale indoor works. Stalker has been an international leader in outdoor theatre using circus, stilts and street theatre. Stalker has performed to hundreds of thousands of people around Australia and the world.
Box of Birds (Stalker Theatre’s cobrand) specialises in the development of interactive digital experiences for live performance as international leaders in the field (See www.boxofbirds.net).
Remaining Spaces
Negotiations are continuing with several other organisations on the remaining spaces.
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS
Council’s Legal department have been consulted and have drafted and approved the terms and conditions of the template Licence Agreement.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
All revenue from agreements will be directed to the maintenance of the venue.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Paying tribute to local leaders
From: The Mayor, Councillor Darcy Byrne
MOTION
1. That Council undertake community consultation about naming the public area at the frontage of the Balmain Court House and Balmain Town Hall as Wran Square in honour of one of Balmain’s most famous citizens, former Premier of NSW, Neville Wran.
2. That Council write to the Attorney General of NSW and the Minister for the Arts seeking support for the Balmain Court House to be reopened for public use. This could include a role for Council in operating or curating the space.
3. That Council investigate opportunities and locations for a tribute to long-term local resident and former High Court Justice Mary Gaudron for her contribution to the law, human rights, and gender equity in Australia.
4. That Council consult with the family of Rochelle Porteous about an appropriate way to commemorate her service to our community as a Councillor and Mayor through the naming of a public space or facility in her honour. |
Background
Neville Wran
Recently I received correspondence from the Attorney General of NSW, Michael Daley, proposing a commemoration for the former Premier of NSW and famous Balmain citizen Neville Wran. Please find this letter attached.
Neville Wran’s record as one of the State’s longest serving and most successful premiers should be commemorated in the place of his birth.
As detailed in the Attorney General’s letter, Mr Wran’s record in law reform, including the decriminalisation of homosexuality, has left a legacy of expanded civil rights that is unparallelled in the history of NSW.
Following Mr Wran’s death in 2014 Leichhardt Council resolved to initiate a memorial for him in Balmain. Following the forced merger of the Council the memorial was never established.
Mary Gaudron
Another long-standing local resident who has made a unique contribution to civil rights and equality in Australia is the former High Court Justice Mary Gaudron.
In 1987 Justice Gaudron become the first women to be appointed to the High Court of Australia. Prior to that she served as the Solicitor-General of NSW from 1981 until 1987.
After her retirement from the High Court in 2002, Justice Gaudron joined the International Labour Organisation, serving as the President of its Administrative Tribunal from 2011 until 2014.
Throughout her legal career Mary Gaudron was a trailblazer for women’s participation in the law, having to overcome many barriers of discrimination that had prevented women serving in leadership positions within the legal fraternity.
Throughout her career as a barrister and a judge Mary Gaudron helped to bring about groundbreaking reforms.
Examples of this include having successfully argued the Whitlam Government’s Equal Pay case in 1972 and later, having been appointed the youngest ever Federal Judge, determining a test case for maternity leave allowing for a year's unpaid leave for all full-time and permanent part-time workers.
Mary Gaudron is a long-term member of our Inner West community and her life story of public service and breaking down barriers of discrimination is worth celebrating.
Rochelle Porteous
Recently we lost former Councillor Rochelle Porteous. Ms Porteous was a long-serving Councillor and Mayor on Leichhardt and Inner West Councils.
At the celebration of her life held at Leichhardt Town Hall on Saturday 22 February the eulogies in her honour reflected on Rochelle’s deep devotion to our local community and to our local democracy, as well as her lifelong activism for environmental sustainability and social justice.
It is right and proper that Rochelle’s dedication and commitment to service of our community be publicly and permanently commemorated.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
1.⇩ |
Letter from the Attorney General |
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Pedestrian Safety improvements between Glover Street and Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre
From: Councillor Ismet Tastan
MOTION
1. That Council improve pedestrian safety between Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre (LPAC), Leichhardt Oval and Leichhardt No. 2 by extending the missing footpath connection between LPAC and Glover Street.
2. That a cost estimate is completed and submitted in time for consideration in the 2025/2026 budget.
|
Background
Behind Leichhardt Oval (opposite Leichhardt No 2 Oval) there is an unsealed area that is used as an unofficial car park. There is currently car parking available all along the other side of Glover Street to the Broughton Hall Complex at Callan Park as well as within the LPAC car park.
There is a footpath along the west side of Glover Street that continues across the road alongside Leichhardt Oval No2 to the waterfront – however this ends for pedestrians walking between Glover St and LPAC.
For pedestrians walking between LPAC and Glover St there is no footpath from the corner where the unsealed car parking is located. Pedestrians are forced to walk along the road in both directions to either access LPAC or the footpath on Glover Street whilst negotiating vehicles travelling in both directions and reversing vehicles parked in the unofficial car park.
On weekends particularly, this poses a safety issue due to high traffic as a result of LPAC, sport at the Leichhardt No 2 and Glover St playing fields and the Rowing Club.
Facing Glover Street
Glover Street
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Improving Traffic Safety Murrell Street, Ashfield
From: Councillor Izabella Antoniou
MOTION
1. That Council notes the high-risk nature of Murrell Street Ashfield as a high traffic drop off / pick up zone that is shared between Ashfield Public school, Good-start Early Learning Child Care Centre and residents in high density housing.
2. That Council notes that the Ashfield Public School, and Good-start Early Learning Child Care Centre community including the P&C have advocated continuously on the issue of safety at Murrell Street and hold ongoing concerns.
3. That Council note that in August 2022 the traffic committee provided recommendations around changes to traffic flow and parking to aid congestion in the street with a 6-12 month review.
4. That Council receives a report back on the efficacy of the parking and traffic changes implemented at Murrell street as a result of the August 2022 traffic committee.
5. That Council conduct a traffic study of the area as a high priority which will include but is not limited to: a) Potential traffic calming measures that are suitable for the area. b) The implementation of a pedestrian crossing and pedestrian safety.. c) The ways Orchard Crescent impacts traffic flow, and potential mediations. d) Compliance of vehicles during peak times. e) Alternative traffic management solutions f) Community consultation with the school and early childcare community, residents and local businesses, including feedback received by council to date on this issue.
|
Background
Murrell Street comes off Liverpool Road and leads into a short section of Orchard Crescent which leads to a dead end some 40 metres west of Murrell Street. Murrell Street measures approximately 9.0 metres from kerb to kerb with parking to both sides of the street with no stopping zones subject to timings in line with school drop-off/pick up.
Murrell Street is currently used as a key drop-off and pick-up sight for
Ashfield Public School and an adjoining Child Care Centre.
The school community has warned about the high traffic of the relatively small street, the difficulties of manoeuvring vehicles, and the unsafe driving practices being forced to be undertaken due to the high-congestion and layout of the area. When factoring in the proximity to school-age children this is a high risk environment.
The school’s P&C and the Good-start Early Learning Child Care Centre
have been advocating to local members of government at both State and Council
level about issues with the street.
In 2022 the Traffic committee resolved to implement the
following measures regarding Murrell Street:
“1.
The following parking changes be approved:
(a) The (4) parking spaces on the western side of Murrell Street, Ashfield outside the side of 183 Liverpool Road be changed to read “No Stopping 8.30am -9.30am, 2.30pm-3.30pm School days” and “2P 9.30am-2.30pm., 3.30pm-6.00pm Mon-Fri Permit Holders Excepted AREA 1”,
(b) ‘No Stopping’ be signposted across:
(i) the combined driveways of 183 Liverpool Road and David’s Lane,
(ii) driveway to 2-4 Murrell Street,
(iii) driveway to 10-12 Murrell Street& side service driveway to 1 Orchard Crescent, and
2. Council forwards a Traffic Management Plan to Transport for NSW to consider and approve ‘No Right Turn 8.00am-9.30am., 2.30pm-4.00pm School Days’ for traffic out of Murrell Street into Liverpool Road.”
Despite these resolutions and changes to parking there is still considerable concern regarding the area. It was noted that 6-12 months after implementation of these measures an assessment would take place and further changes to be made if issues persist.
At this stage non-infrastructure based resolutions seem to be exhausted. Therefore, Council is placed to explore additional alternative ways to support the safety of the area particularly due to the ongoing and slated additional development in the area which will continue to put additional traffic pressure on the street.
Turning circle at the end of Murrell St.
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 at 10:36, Ashfield PS P&C wrote:
Dear Ms Haylen MP and team
I am writing on behalf of the Ashfield Public School P&C. We would love to have a chat with you ASAP regarding the traffic situation at Ashfield Public School - specifically Murrell Street (which is on the side of the school).
On Tuesday, in the torrential downpour a fence and retaining wall collapsed on the Murrell Street side of the school. Here is a video from Mr Moran (Principal) where you can see the damage. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4s9QQRqXXyc
Aside from the short-term issues in fixing this wall (it is expected the retaining wall will take months to fix), we have now lost valuable car parking/drop off spaces for parents dropping off and collecting their children from school.
Even before the wall collapse, Murrell St had significant traffic issues due to the constant construction of apartment blocks and the fact it is a small and narrow street with a tight turning circle at the end.
Unfortunately, Murrell Street is the only street available for direct dropoff/collection as Liverpool road has no parking and significant traffic flowing.
Obviously, we are encouraging parents and their children to walk wherever possible to minimise the traffic to the area. Or to use parking options such as Wests. I walk with my kids most days, but I never let them go in the Murrell Street gates because crossing Murrell Street on Liverpool road is so dangerous with traffic trying to turn left, turn in and turn out to the right.
But, as you will know, walking is a luxury of time and practicality that not everyone can afford.
Our ideal solution would be to make Murrell Street a one way street and return vehicles back to Brown Street via Orchard Crescent so at least this would prevent turning vehicles almost running over kids, and the chaos of cars trying to make different turns and move around each other.
We understand that the rest of the lane along the commuter car park is owned by Meriton so we're not sure of the feasibility of this. But we would very much like your assistance to pursue this solution.
We are very worried about the dangerous situation on Murrell
Street. We'd love for you to come and check it out - preferably around 3pm pick
up (it's particularly bad on days like this when it's raining), so you can see
how dangerous and chaotic it is.
We'd be grateful for any support you could offer on this matter.
Thanks in advance.
Kind regard
Gemma Collier
Stay in Touch with the P&C - visit our Website or follow us on Facebook or Instagram
To Join the P&C, our membership form is here
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 at 4:43 pm, Ashfield PS P&C < > wrote:
Hi Dylan,
Below is a summary of the main issues in Murrell Street written by APS Principal Damien Moran - all discussed with Boris Muha from IW council on Monday afternoon.
Murrell Street has been a problem for many years - looking through traffic related correspondence over the years, various incarnations of P&C members have tried to address the issue - I can find communications back to 2014. Traffic has only become worse, and now we have several large apartment blocks built on Murrell Street which only makes things more problematic.
It doesn't make any sense to us that Drynan/Teakle Street (St Patrick's School, Summer Hill) was upgraded to a Zebra Crossing recently but Ashfield Public School - located in the centre of Ashfield on a major road is not considered? Will it take a serious accident involving a child for someone to do something? We also have a childcare centre on Murrell Street - these children need to be protected!
We appreciate your support on this matter, and we do hope that we will make some changes in 2022.
Best
Sarah Newman
P&C President
Stay in Touch with the P&C - visit our Website or
follow us on Facebook or Instagram
To Join the P&C, our membership form is here
From: Damien Moran
<DAMIEN.MORAN@det.nsw.edu.au>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 at 13:43
Subject: Re: Murrell Street Meeting 15th March 2.45pm
To: Ashfield PS P&C <ashfieldpandc@gmail.com>,
boris.muha@innerwest.nsw.gov.au <boris.muha@innerwest.nsw.gov.au>, Gemma
Collier <gemma@littlecoriander.com>,
afd@goodstart.org.au <afd@goodstart.org.au>, Ashfield MCS
<akids@weldon.com.au>, summerhill@parliament.nsw.gov.au
<summerhill@parliament.nsw.gov.au>, Mat.Howard@innerwest.nsw.gov.au
<Mat.Howard@innerwest.nsw.gov.au>, kathryncourtneyprior <kathryncourtneyprior@gmail.com>, Sarah Newman
<sarahenewman75@gmail.com>, Kathrine.Spina@innerwest.nsw.gov.au
<Kathrine.Spina@innerwest.nsw.gov.au>
Good afternoon,
After consultation with the P&C, I have summarised what I believe to the main issues requiring attention to make Murrell Street a safer throughfare for our young pedestrians:
1. Installation of a safety fence at the bottom of Murrell Street. Currently many pedestrians take a shortcut across the centre of the roundabout.
2. No stopping (8:30am-9:30am) (2:30pm-3:30pm) (Monday-Friday) along Murrell Street to allow a two-way flow of traffic. Currently during the congestion of school drop off and pick up it is only possible for one car to move in a particular direction at any given time.
3. Construction of a pedestrian crossing. Currently there is no controlled crossing point on Murrell Street.
4. No right-hand turn
(8:30am-9:30am) (2:30pm-3:30pm) (Monday-Friday) from Murrell Street into
Liverpool Road. Currently vehicles waiting to turn right bring the traffic flow
on Murrell Street to a standstill as they wait several minutes at a time for a
break in the traffic.
5. Resurfacing of the road and new footpaths are also long overdue.
Please remember that across the years Murrell Street has been profoundly by:
● a doubling of the APS school enrolment to almost 500 students
● the construction of high rise, high density-living apartments
● the rezoning of Murrell Street to be part of the Ashfield town centre.
I take inspiration and hope from the beautiful road and footpath refurbishment that was recently completed on the corner of Dryan and Teakle Street, Summer Hill outside St Patrick's School that something can happen on the long neglected and questionable safety of Murrell Street.
Regards
Damien Moran
Principal
Ashfield Public School
From:
Ashfield PS P&C <ashfieldpandc@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, 16 February 2023 8:38 AM
To: Kathrine Spina <Kathrine.Spina@innerwest.nsw.gov.au>
Cc: summerhill@parliament.nsw.gov.au
Subject: Re: Council will be enforcing School Zones - Please advise
parents
Hi Katherine,
Thank you for this information.
You may be aware that Ashfield Public School has a lot of problems with parking and traffic due to the very limited access to parking for school drop off and pick up due to our location in between the train station and Liverpool Road.
We approached the council last year and now have some "no parking" zones which has been helpful, however, we are now suffering from even less parking due to a development in Murrell Street.
Additionally, we have requested a change in traffic conditions - no right turn from Murrell Street onto Liverpool Rd - due to the flow of traffic being severely affected. We are waiting on Transport for NSW to get back to us on this.
The crossing at Liverpool Road and Murrell Street is extremely hazardous due to the traffic congestion around the school at drop off and pick up times. I would like to discuss with you the possibility of a pedestrian crossing being placed on Murrell Street to make the road safer for the children.
Thank you
Sarah Newman
President Ashfield Public School P&C
Ph: 0411025881
I acknowledge the Wangal People, the traditional owners of this place we call Ashfield, and pay my respects to their elders past and present.
From: Michela Carattini <ameraussie@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 10:16 AM
Subject: Letter of Impact of 1-2 Orchard St Development
To: Sarah Newman <sarahenewman75@gmail.com>
Hi Sarah,
Please see letter below and attached. Please
pass on to your contact, thank you.
Letter of Impact of 1-2 Orchard St
Development
Dear Council Member, March 7th, 2023
We write to you as the Parents & Carers at Ashfield Public School, where over 500 children ages 5-12 years old, as well as over 60 teachers and staff, attend every day. Directly next door to us is Goodstart Early Learning centre, where another 36 children, ages 0-5, plus staff, attend daily.
We would like to bring to your immediate attention the demolition and building works by Bassil Construction at 1-2 Orchard Crescent, a property adjacent to our school, which has already begun preliminary work and is due to start demolition properly next week, causing excessive noise and air pollution less than 20 meters from our classrooms, school hall, canteen and playground. Bassil Construction has indicated the construction at this address is expected to continue for the next 15 months.
The evidence that excessive noise has negative effects on a child’s ability to learn is overwhelming and uncontroversial. As just one example, research by the World Health Organisation (WHO) shows that children exposed to continuous disruptive noise experience poorer reading ability, memory and academic performance, and that the safe level of noise in a classroom should not exceed 35 decibels.
Many of our students learn in demountables, with minimal insulation in close proximity to the construction zone and the main school building has no air conditioning, so windows must be kept open. Additionally, our community includes children and adults with disabilities, those who are neurodivergent, those with additional support needs, and include those with trouble hearing and concentrating. Excessive noise has additional, well-documented, mental health impacts on these members of our community.
The Australian Government EPA Guidelines require that at a minimum community consultation and mitigation measures should have occurred, however there was no consultation or mitigation offered to the school or its community.
We are writing to request that the builder of this property make adjustments to reduce the impact on the school, our children and their learning (which in turn impacts their individual futures and our collective community future). These adjustments should include:
● A halt to demolition during NAPLAN exams next week
● Decibel level limitation during school hours (ie, high decibel works to be scheduled outside of school hours or during school holidays).
● Provision of air conditioners to the school to mitigate the levels of dust and air pollution
These are reasonable and fair impact mitigation measures, for which there is precedent where building companies have construction sites near public schools, for example, as occurred at Kogarah Public School with building company Level 33, where the company provided the school with 11 air conditioners and agreed to limit site works during certain intervals. The proximity of the school no doubt increases the value and interest in the property, however in turn care must be taken in the impact of the property’s development on the school.
We appreciate you acting urgently on this matter, as our community has already been affected by the preliminary works last week, with adults and students reporting returning home from school with pounding headaches and emotional distress.
Your Sincerely,
Ashfield Public School P&C Association
POC: Michela Carattini
Tel: 04 4826 4680
Email: .
Arpana Ahluwalia <arpanaahluwalia@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 at 10:44
Subject: Rg: PARENT FORUM - Parking Restrictions on Murrell Street
To: Ashfield P &C PS <ashfieldpandc@gmail.com>
Hi All,
It's been more than a year since we are following up with the council for the Murrell Street parking issue. I would like to suggest few things, which may / may not be feasible.
(A) Increase the time to 5 mins parking for the current "NO PARKING" zone on Murrell Street.
(B) Reduce the time slot (pickup time) for the current "NO PARKING" zone to 2:30pm - 3:30pm (currently till 4:00pm).
(C) Trial this in the current scenario with the help of a teacher / parent volunteer / lollypop person: Keeping both the gates (main gate and the smaller gate near AKOOSH) open on Murrell Street entrance, a teacher / parent volunteer / lollypop person could be standing outside the gate on footpath) to lead / watch the kids getting off the car and getting into the school campus (i.e. help manage the drop off on daily basis) from 8:45am till 9:00am. Soon kids/parents will get used to of the process and follow it correctly. This would also increase children's safety outside the school gate.. QUICKEST - EASIEST - CHEAPEST solution! Hopefully, no interference of council needed!!!
(D) Increase the time slot for the "Liverpool road parking Opp. to main school gate" from 8:30pm - 3:30pm (currently 1Hr parking from 9:00am till 3:00pm). However, changing the time slot for the Liverpool road parking may not be under the local council traffic committee. We may have to involve the other state/road traffic committees for the same.
Also, while doing the survey we should not just count the number of parents driving to school but include those potential parents who would prefer to drive (but unable to do so due to parking chaos) to school. Looking at the future prospects of growing APS family, parents would be driving from different suburbs (future OC parents + other influenced families) to APS. My personal opinion, survey should be eliminated!
On a long term plan, we should find out any possibility for having a drive through (one way) to the school "Kiss n Ride / 5 mins parking" spot on Murrell street from the train station car park (parallel to the Orchard Cres) to the school round about! Station car park gets full before 8:00am and there is hardly any general traffic (public) during the school pick up / drop off hours. (I have sent a picture to PandC email showing the potential drive through / ramp on Orchard Cres). This will be an easy access for teachers / parents driving from Brown Street (saving time / avoiding the route towards Holden Street & going through the lights signal on Liverpool road, taking a left turn on Murrell Street) straight to the staff parking / school gates on Murrell Street. General public may use this route as well, but daily drivers would soon figure out that tagging along the cars isn't an option for them in the morning :). We may have to bring more than one traffic committees together to get this done. It might be expensive for council, however it will benefit both the school parents (APS & ABH) / teachers (APS) on permanent basis.
With obvious reasons, council may come up with their own limitations and restrictions. However, I strongly feel that we may have to fight for the exceptions this time :-)
I hate to say that I can't make it for Monday forum!
Regards,
Arpana
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Community Engagement Process for Public Domain Impacts
From: Councillor Ismet Tastan
MOTION
1. That Council develop a clear and transparent process for engaging with residents on key issues and that this is tabled at the April 2025 Council meeting for approval.
2. That this process is easily accessible and promoted on the website.
3. That Council provide regular updates to the community, ensuring residents are informed on progress, timelines, status updates and upcoming consultation opportunities by an appropriate method that can be accessed in real time vs having to request updates from councillors or council staff.
|
Background
Resident meetings are a cornerstone of a healthy democratic community and a key opportunity for Council to hear directly on issues that concern the community.
The intention of this NoM is to ensure that there is a consistent process applied in relation to the actions and outcomes that arise from these meetings, and how actions are tracked and the community kept updated.
This needs to happen in a consistent, predictable and transparent manner.
The process should include a timeframe for circulation of minutes, approval of minutes, community consultation, tracking / status updates on actions, budgets, timelines (expected start/finish dates) and further consultation activities in addition to further recommendations from Council staff relating to best practice.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Murrell Street, Ashfield Traffic Safety Review
From: Councillor Jo Carlisle
MOTION
1. That Council note the traffic and parking changes on Murrell Street, Ashfield that were approved by the Local Traffic Committee on 18 July 2022, including: a) installation of "No Stopping 8:30am-9:30am, 2:30pm-3:30pm School days" and "2P 9:30am-2:30pm, 3:30pm-6:00pm Mon-Fri Permit Holders Excepted AREA 1" signage on the western side of Murrell Street outside 183 Liverpool Road; b) installation of 'No Stopping' signage across specified driveways; and c) the outcome of correspondence with Transport for NSW regarding the proposed 'No Right Turn 8:00am-9:30am, 2:30pm-4:00pm School Days' restriction for traffic exiting Murrell Street onto Liverpool Road.
2. That Council note ongoing concerns from parents and the Ashfield Public School community that traffic safety issues on Murrell Street have not improved despite the measures approved in July 2022.
3. That Council add Murrell Street to the increased surveillance schedule for Council Rangers, particularly during school zone hours (8:00am-9:30am and 2:30pm-4:00pm on school days), to ensure compliance with parking restrictions and improve overall safety
4. That Council conduct a comprehensive traffic study of Murrell Street, Ashfield, with particular focus on: a) Traffic flow during school drop-off and pick-up times; b) Pedestrian safety, particularly for school children; c) Vehicle speeds and driver behaviour including U-turns in the street; d) Current parking arrangements and compliance; e) Access issues for local residents and businesses; and f) Alternative traffic management solutions.
5. That Council request that the traffic study include direct consultation with Ashfield Public School, Goodstart Early Learning Child Care Centre, local residents, and businesses.
6. That Council receive a report on the implementation status of the traffic and parking changes from July 2022 and the proposed scope and timeframe for a comprehensive traffic study, at the April 2025 Council meeting.
|
Background
In July 2022, the Local Traffic Committee approved various traffic and parking changes for Murrell Street, Ashfield in response to concerns from Ashfield Public School and Goodstart Early Learning Child Care Centre regarding traffic safety.
Despite these measures, parents from Ashfield Public School continue to report significant safety concerns during school drop-off and pick-up times. The congestion issues, particularly related to vehicles waiting to turn right onto Liverpool Road, appear to persist.
The school community has raised ongoing concerns about the safety of children navigating this congested street during peak times. A comprehensive traffic study is needed to better understand the current traffic patterns and identify more effective solutions to improve safety for all road users, particularly school children.
This motion seeks to assess the implementation and effectiveness of previously approved measures and to develop more comprehensive solutions based on a detailed traffic study.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Dedicated Reflection Area at Johnson Park
From: Councillor Jessica D'Arienzo
MOTION
1. That Council installs a small, dedicated reflection area at Johnson Park in Dulwich Hill, incorporating seating and a plaque or similar commemorative feature where community members can honour their beloved pets.
2. That through the Companion Animal team, engages with the local community to gather input on the design and implementation of the reflection area. |
Background
Many Inner West residents form deep emotional connections with their pets, and the loss of a pet can be a profound and often unacknowledged grief.
Johnson Park is a beloved space for many locals The large
park is currently under renovation as part of the Greenway. When it reopens
later this year, the off leash dog area will return along with other
improvements.
During the community consultation on the temporary relocation of the off leash area dog park, community members expressed their desire to create a small, dedicated area within the park where pet owners can reflect and remember their companions in a peaceful environment.
We invite ideas and initiatives that would foster a sense of connection, remembrance, and shared experience among local pet owners, while enhancing the park’s inclusive and welcoming atmosphere.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Communication Board Installation in a Local Park in the Ashfield-Djarrawunang ward
From: Councillor Jessica D'Arienzo
MOTION
That Council installs a communication board in a local park within the Ashfield-Djarrawunang ward and engages with relevant stakeholders to ensure the board meets accessibility standards and best supports non-verbal individuals. |
Background
A communication board is a large, accessible board featuring predictable words aligned with well-recognised symbols that facilitate message exchange. It is a crucial tool for non-verbal children and adults, stroke survivors, and others who may experience communication barriers.
The installation of a communication board at a local park aligns with Council’s commitment to inclusivity, accessibility, and community engagement.
The communication board can be an additional feature of any playground, and should be incorporated into all our inclusive playgrounds.
Council’s first Inclusive playground facility was opened at King George Park in September 2024 . The playground is highly successful in encouraging children of all abilities to enjoy sharing a wonderful play space.
We are currently seeking community feedback on the design concept plan for our flagship inclusive playground at Yeo Park in Ashfield-Djarrawunang ward.
This design philosophy should be adopted for all playground upgrades into the future and be a key feature of Council's playground strategy once developed.
The cost of the communication board is estimated at $1,200 and can be met out of Council's Park Operational budget.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Inner West e-Bike Strategy and shared e-Bike provider round table.
From: Councillor Kerrie Fergusson
MOTION
1. That Council organise a roundtable discussion with leading micro-mobility companies to explore the following topics: a) the establishment of designated parking zones; b) potential expansion of coverage within the Inner West LGA to include Ashfield and Croydon, with plans for future extension to the northern side of the LGA; and c) improvement in maintenance and cleanliness, including the provision of helmets and prompt removal of graffiti.
2. That Council extend an invitation to key representatives from leading micro-mobility companies to participate in the Mode Shift Forum.
3. That Council formulate an Inner West e-Bike Strategy to guide the growth and management of e-bike usage in the area.
4. That Council develop an Inner West e-Bike Policy, focusing on safety, and where necessary, advocate for tighter regulations from the State Government.
|
Background
E-bike rentals have emerged as a popular, equitable, and sustainable transportation option in the Inner West, offering significant potential to contribute to mode shift and a reduction in car use for short, local trips.
However, to fully realise the benefits of shared e-bikes across the Inner West, several issues need to be addressed, including parking, maintenance, and coverage.
Additionally, to ensure safe usage, the Council must take a more decisive stance on how it regulates and plans for the expansion of e-bike usage in the Inner West.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Booth Street Connection for White Bay Cruise Ship Terminal Tourist Path and Active Transport.
From: Councillor Kerrie Fergusson
MOTION
1. That Council write to the Port Authority requesting: a) commitment to collaborating with the council to create a safe and accessible passage for pedestrians and cyclists from Robert Street to Booth Street; b) confirm the timeline for granting this access; and c) schedule a meeting with the council to discuss the configuration of the access and the council’s role in this project. Consider possible designs and allocations of costs to create an Active Transport Path on Port Authority land.
2. That Council liaise with the Port Authority and the Balmain Rozelle Chamber of Commerce to establish an unmanned kiosk at the White Bay Cruise Terminal. The kiosk should provide maps and information about Balmain to attract more tourists.
3. That Council investigate and report back on the estimated costs for council to convert the lower Booth Street Road Reserve (from Donnelly Street to Port Authority Gate) into a suitable Active Transport Corridor.
4. That Council explore potential funding sources and provide costs involved in installing appropriate way-finding signage for tourists traveling from central Darling Street to White Bay and from East Balmain Ferry Wharf to White Bay.
5. That Council prepare a report for the July Meeting, summarising the outcome of the Port Authority correspondence and providing estimated costs for the following projects: a) Kiosk; b) Way-finding signage; and c) Converting lower Booth Street to an Active Transport corridor.
|
Background
The White Bay Cruise Terminal presents a largely untapped economic opportunity for Balmain. Currently, passengers arriving in Balmain by Uber, taxi, bus, or ferry often struggle to find the terminal. Due to the complicated route from Balmain to the terminal, it’s common to see confused tourists wandering with their luggage, able to see the ship but unable to reach it.
This not only creates a frustrating experience for visitors, but it also represents a missed opportunity for the local economy. To address this, there needs to be a clear and direct route from central Balmain to the Robert Street Terminal, with straightforward signage guiding passengers from the Balmain East ferry wharf to the terminal and back.
Additionally, an unmanned kiosk inside the White Bay Cruise Terminal could provide valuable information about Balmain’s many restaurants, pubs, rich history, harborside parks, and unique retail offerings, along with easy-to-read maps. This would encourage tourists to explore, shop and dine in the heart of Balmain. I’d like to acknowledge Year 6 students Emily and Eloise from Nicholson Street Public School in Balmain East for presenting this idea during a Local Government Session, and the Balmain Rozelle Chamber of Commerce for their ongoing advocacy in this area.
Such improvements could significantly boost investment in our local economy. But how do we turn this vision into reality, given the current convoluted route between the terminal and Balmain? By creating a new connection. Opening the land between Robert Street and the currently closed Booth Street Road Reserve to create an Active Transport corridor will result in a direct path linking to the existing pedestrian and bike path on Robert Street, creating a seamless route from the terminal to Balmain.
This would also strengthen the White Bay precinct's Active Transport corridor as part of the Balmain-to-City pathway envisioned by the Sustainable Transport Group by connecting with the newly proposed separated bike and pedestrian path on the southern end of Robert Street.
As we look towards the development of Bays West, it is crucial to connect Balmain not only to the city but also to the broader Bays Precinct. We must build our identity and connectivity to ensure that the vibrancy brought by new development benefits not just the Bays Precinct but the whole of Balmain and Rozelle, particularly our high streets.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Perfect Match Business Facade Improvement Program
From: Deputy Mayor Mat Howard
MOTION
a) the program intent is to support businesses that are prominently located to make facade improvements and enhance mainstreets, in turn supporting local jobs and our local economy b) the program represent an extension of the existing Perfect Match program by: i. matching mural artists with local businesses to paint murals on awnings, facades and windows, and ii. providing decals of murals by local artists that can be installed in vacant shopfronts iii. providing opportunities for eligible businesses to seek financial support to undertake other minor works (such as window or awning repairs, repointing or painting) c) eligibility be restricted to businesses within the Inner West local government area that can demonstrate an ongoing connection to a property such as a long-term lease or property ownership d) businesses be required to make a matching financial contribution e) when deciding successful applicants, weighting be applied to multicultural businesses and businesses owned by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people f) successful applicants are evenly distributed across the five wards of the Inner West Council.
2. That Council receive a report on the establishment of the program at the May 2025 Council meeting.
|
Background
Vibrant mainstreets are critical to supporting the liveability and prosperity of our suburbs and communities.
Inner West Council has initiated several programs in an effort to enhance our mainstreets and is making a record investment in public domain works. Some of these initiatives - including bin wrapping and installing fairy lights - are “quick wins” and have made an immediate improvement.
A business facade program is another way to deliver quick improvements to businesses where facades are in a state of disrepair, or where shopfronts are vacant.
Many local councils provide business facade improvement programs, including the City of Sydney, City of Parramatta, Southern Grampians Shire Council, Moyne Shire Council, and others.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: McNeilly Park Public Toilets
From: Deputy Mayor Mat Howard
MOTION
1. That Council commit to upgrading the public toilet facilities at McNeilly Park, Marrickville.
2. That Council prepare a report on costs and timeline for installation in this current term of Council by the May 2025 Council meeting.
|
Background
McNeilly Park is a much loved park in the heart of Marrickville, close to Marrickville Station. It has one of the largest playgrounds in the suburb, making it a popular destination for families. Many residents walk through the park to access the train station and Illawarra Road businesses.
The public toilet at McNeilly Park is in need of upgrade and residents are eager for any plans to include an increase in the number of toilets available, a point reflected in the Inner West Council’s public toilet strategy.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Jarvie Park Public Toilets
From: Deputy Mayor Mat Howard
MOTION
1. That Council commit to building public toilet facilities at Jarvie Park, Marrickville.
2. That Council prepare a report on costs and timeline for installation in this current term of council by the May 2025 Council Meeting.
|
Background
Jarvie Park is a very popular park in Marrickville and the park features a playground, basketball courts and is home to the Midjuburi Youth Resource Centre. Plumtree Children's Services, KU Crusader Preschool and Marrickville High School all neighbour the park.
The public toilets currently in the park are in the Midjuburi Youth Resource Centre and are not available outside of specified times when the MYRC is open. While there are toilets at nearby Henson Park, they are not accessible for families and do not have change facilities.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Council engagement with Homes NSW on waste management
From: Deputy Mayor Mat Howard
MOTION
1. That Council reaffirm its commitment to ongoing engagement with Homes NSW and community housing providers to improve waste management for residents of public and community housing in the Inner West.
2. That Council receive a report at the June 2025 Council meeting regarding ongoing engagement with Homes NSW and community housing providers on waste management, detailing issues that have been raised to date and council’s approach to resolving them.
3. That Council receive further reports on this engagement twice a year.
|
Background
At the December Council meeting, Council resolved that staff would commence regular engagement with Homes NSW and community housing providers on waste management. This followed long-standing issues with waste management at Cahill Place, Marrickville.
Inner West Council has a role to play to ensure residents in public and community housing have access to the highest standard of waste management possible.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Improved waste management practices in future planning
From: Deputy Mayor Mat Howard and Councillor Jessica D'Arienzo
MOTION
That Council, as part of updating key planning instruments and policies, including council’s Development Control Plan (DCP) and design guidelines, incorporate measures that improve waste management for residents of future multi-unit dwellings. These measures should include, but not be limited to opportunities to provide infrastructure and guidelines to make FOGO and sustainable waste collection more accessible and updated guidelines around adequate space both within buildings and for on-street bin collection, recognising diversified waste streams for FOGO, recycling and landfill.
|
Background
Inner West Council continues to work to implement key sustainability measures including movement towards a circular economy. A key element of this has been the implementation of food and garden organics recycling (FOGO) to every household.
The NSW State Government has legislated a mandate for all households to have FOGO by 2030, when NSW is predicted to run out of landfill space.
As Council updates key planning instruments, it is critical that the evolving requirements for sustainable waste practices be considered and appropriately incorporated. With respect to FOGO, this might include the inclusion of FOGO chutes in high-rise, adequate space within buildings for FOGO bins, and adequate space outside buildings for FOGO and other bin collection.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Pedestrian crossing on Liberty Street, Stanmore
From: Councillor Chloe Smith
MOTION
1. That Council note the advocacy by Stanmore Public School P&C to support safer walking and cycling for students and parents to and from Stanmore Public School, and that these efforts align with Council's commitment to increase active transport and support healthy communities.
2. That Council note the Traffic Committee's recommendation from August 2024, endorsed by Council, to install a pedestrian and bike crossing, kerb extension, speed cushions, and associated signs and line markings at Liberty St near the roundabout, with a design to be brought back to the Committee for consideration.
3. That Council further note the Committee's request that Transport for NSW consider reducing the speed limit on Liberty St and Kingston Rd from 60km/h to 50km/h.
4. That Council allocate funding as part of 2025/26 budget considerations to expedite design and delivery once a design is approved.
|
Background
A letter from the President of Stanmore Public School P&C is attached, as well as the concept plan from the August 2024 Local Traffic Committee meeting.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
1.⇩ |
Letter from the President of Stanmore Public School P&C |
2.⇩ |
Liberty Street Pedestrian Crossing Concept Design |
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: A Community Battery for the Inner West
From: Councillor Chloe Smith
MOTION
That Council explore opportunities to partner with Ausgrid or other entities on an Expression of Interest (EOI) application for the Commonwealth Government's Community Batteries Funding Round 2, with the intention to submit before the deadline on 30 April 2025.
|
Background
The October 2022 Federal Budget provided $200 million to deploy 400 community batteries across Australia. Of this, $171 million was allocated to the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA) to deliver at least 342 batteries. The program seeks to support the deployment of community batteries to lower energy bills, cut emissions, reduce pressure on the electricity grid, and enable further solar installations.
Round 1 of funding saw ARENA approve $124.7 million to deploy 318 batteries across all states and the NT. The remaining $46.3 million has been allocated towards Round 2 which was announced in February 2025.
Inner West Council explored a joint application with Ausgrid for a community battery during the previous funding round and should do so again. Local governments are included in the eligibility requirements as are joint organisations of councils. Submitting a joint application with Ausgrid or a similar entity who has logistical and technical expertise will strengthen the application.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Railway Avenue, Stanmore - Traffic Accident Report
From: Councillor Vicki Clay
MOTION
1. That Council prepare an analysis report of traffic incidences that have occurred on Railway Avenue Stanmore since the installation of the traffic calming cushions.
2. That Council include in the report details of how many of the traffic incidences were determined to be a direct consequence of the layout/design of the traffic calming cushions.
3. That Council present the report for consideration at the April 2025 Council meeting.
|
Background
Community members in Stanmore and surrounding suburbs have expressed concern that the installation of traffic calming cushions, half the width of the roadway, in a staggered layout, encourages traffic to swerve around the traffic calming cushions to avoid driving over the cushions.
As a consequence, with concerns regarding traffic accident risks, the community members would like Council to review whether the traffic calming cushion layout has caused accidents or is likely to cause accidents, particularly head on.
To assist Councillors in responding to community concerns, it is believed that a report detailing actual incidences would assist to allay community concerns.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Shaw Street, Petersham – Proposed Pedestrian Crossing
From: Councillor Vicki Clay
MOTION
1. That Council prepare a report on estimated costings for a Pedestrian Crossing in Shaw Street Petersham with safety inclusions for persons with mobility devices and prams.
2. That Council include in the report an analysis of vehicle traffic in addition to pedestrian traffic estimates from Shaw Street and surrounding streets.
3. That Council determine a pedestrian crossing design that would also act as a traffic calming measure.
4. That Council consider the location of the pedestrian crossing to be between James and Oxford Streets as a midway point on Shaw Street, which would: a) provide residents from surrounding streets easier access to cross Shaw Street safely; and b) allow shortcuts for pedestrians to either Illawarra Road or Newington from Shaw Street.
5. That Council refer the matter to the Local Traffic Committee for consideration with a recommendation to be tabled to Council following the next Committee meeting.
|
Background
Shaw Street Petersham is a regional road that acts as an important arterial connection between Crystal Street Petersham and Addison Road, allowing drivers to continue to roadways that will feed onto Princes Highway Tempe, or alternatively to Illawarra Road Petersham, leading to Marrickville, Dulwich Hill and New Canterbury Road.
As such, Shaw Street has a constant flow of traffic, despite it being a residential street with a mix of senior citizens, young families, and persons with mobility devices.
Entry to Shaw Street from either Crystal Street or Addison Road does not have good visibility for drivers to see pedestrians who are endeavouring to cross the road, close to the intersections, due to the incline and curvature of the roadway.
Community members of Shaw Street have expressed their concerns about the lack of safety for crossing the street, other than the option to either walk up the hill to get to the intersection of Stanmore Road and Crystal Street, or go down the hill to Addison Road and cross over to the other side of Addison Road, which does not achieve the goal of getting to the other side of Shaw Street. Either of these options are onerous for residents.
Therefore, the community members have requested the installation of a safe pedestrian crossing that is suitable for seniors citizens, young families with prams and those with mobility devices. A review of the streetscape would indicate that a midway point for the location of a safe pedestrian crossing could be between James and Oxford Streets.
The location of the pedestrian crossing would also provide easier access for pedestrians from the surrounding streets, seeking an easier walk to Illawarra Road or Newington, and as such, a crossing located between James and Oxford Streets.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Flood improvement plan for Evan Jones Playground and Whites Creek Lane, Leichhardt
From: Councillor Philippa Scott
MOTION
1. That Council develop a plan for safe and effective flood management across Evan Jones Playground and Whites Creek Lane, Leichhardt and upgrades to the infrastructure in this playground and street, including: a) reviewing and reporting on the timeline for the implementation of any relevant recommendations of the Leichhardt Flood Risk Management Plan which applies to flood management in this area; b) undertake investigations of all components of the stormwater drainage system which drains from Emma Street to the Whites Creek Channel through Evan Jones Park, in collaboration with Sydney Water; c) ensuring that stormwater improvements are included as part of the playground upgrade for Evan Jones Playground planned in FY2025/2026, including the replacement of bark chips in the playground with a surface that does not clog local drains; d) clearing and preparing a maintenance plan for the stormwater drains in Whites Creek Lane, in collaboration with Sydney Water where necessary; e) reviewing the street sweeping schedule for the lane and advising Whites Creek Lane residents via letterbox drop of the schedule; f) Council officers to hold a public meeting with residents to publicly discuss and assess the grove of trees in the reserve land on the corner of Whites Creek Lane and Styles Street for any danger and soft soil as the result of recent heavy rains; and g) reviewing and improving the dead-end signage at the entrance to Whites Creek Lane at Reserve Street.
2. That Council report this plan to the May 2025 Council meeting, in time to inform the budget.
|
Background
Recent severe weather events have highlighted insufficient flood management and infrastructure maintenance within Evan Jones Playground and Whites Creek Lane. Following heavy rainfall, the lane has experienced significant flooding, posing an ongoing risk to both public safety and private property.
Community members have documented extensive overland flow from Evan Jones Playground into the lane, exacerbated by infrastructure deficiencies. Notably, the stormwater pollutant trap access hatch in Evan Jones Playground continues to dislodge during storm events, creating a dangerous hazard with a drop of several meters into floodwaters, meters away from a children’s playground. Additionally, debris accumulation, including soft-fall wood chips from the playground, regularly clogs drainage systems, further intensifying flood impacts.
Residents have raised concerns regarding the council’s response. Despite prior commitments from council officers to address these issues, necessary actions—such as securing the stormwater pollutant trap, implementing regular drainage maintenance, and coordinating street sweeping—have not been undertaken with sufficient urgency. This has resulted in persistent public health risks, including sewage overflow and rotting organic matter left uncleared for extended periods.
Council has a duty of care to mitigate flood risks and ensure public safety. The community has expressed a strong desire for the council to develop a proactive plan to manage flooding in the area, integrating infrastructure upgrades, improved drainage maintenance, and enhanced communication with residents.
This motion seeks to ensure a timely and comprehensive response by incorporating flood improvement measures into planned upgrades for Evan Jones Reserve and establishing a structured maintenance and communication plan for Whites Creek Lane.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Rezoning of additional former WestConnex dive sites for mixed residential development
From: Councillor Philippa Scott
MOTION
1. That Council notes that Council has endorsed the NSW Government’s commitment to convert the former WestConnex dive site in Camperdown into a residential development of 500 homes, including 200 affordable rental properties for essential workers.
2. That Council calls on the NSW Government to undertake a similar land audit and rezoning process for the three additional former WestConnex dive sites at: · Parramatta Road and Wattle Street, Haberfield; · Parramatta Road and Bland Street, Haberfield; and · Parramatta Road and Bland Street, Ashfield.
3. That Council writes to the Premier, relevant Ministers, and Landcom, advocating for these sites to be rezoned as a matter of priority, for mixed-use and mixed-market residential development, including a significant portion of government-owned affordable and low-income rental housing.
4. That Council recognises that residential communities living near WestConnex dive sites have suffered through years of construction, dust, noise and resumption of residential housing and have now been left with a concrete pad and temporary noise barriers. They deserve a well-planned development, integrated and sympathetic to its surrounds, which will benefit the existing community and new residents.
5. That Council offers active assistance in the planning and development process to ensure that these projects align to the broader objective of increasing housing supply and urban renewal along Parramatta Road.
|
Background
This motion seeks to build on recent successes and ensure that surplus government land in the Inner West is effectively used to address the housing crisis, support essential workers, and contribute to redevelopment of the Parramatta Road corridor.
Following the announcement in February of the conversion of the former WestConnex dive site on Parramatta Road in Camperdown into a mixed-use residential development, Inner West Council recognises the potential for similar redevelopment of additional former dive sites. The Camperdown project, undertaken by the NSW Government agency Landcom, is set to provide approximately 500 new homes, with 200 of these designated as government-owned rental properties at below-market rates for essential workers.
This initiative aligns with Inner West Council’s ongoing advocacy for increased residential density in suitable locations and the urgent need to expand affordable housing options. The identified sites in Camperdown were selected following the NSW Government’s land audit and through Council’s efforts to ensure the most effective use of surplus government land.
To further support housing supply, affordable rental opportunities, and the revitalisation of Parramatta Road, Council seeks to extend similar redevelopment considerations to three additional former WestConnex dive sites within the Leichhardt Ward, specifically:
● Parramatta Road and Wattle Street, Haberfield;
● Parramatta Road and Bland Street, Haberfield;
● Parramatta Road and Bland Street, Ashfield.
The NSW government is currently undertaking a land audit and staged release of suitable properties. There is a case to be made for these sites to be prioritised given their close proximity to existing residential streets, where Haberfield and Ashfield residents have tolerated significant disruption over years, with residential properties resumed for tunnelling, noisy and dirty construction taking place for years, and the construction sites left vacant and unrealised. These communities deserve to see the value of these sites realised with development that offers public amenity and an uplift to the surrounding neighbourhood.
These locations present significant opportunities for mixed-use and mixed-market developments, including government-owned affordable rental housing for essential workers and low-income residents, contributing to a more vibrant, sustainable, and accessible urban environment. The density achieved at Camperdown of 500 homes should be a minimum for what can be achieved at Haberfield and Ashfield.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Question on Notice: White Bay Cruise Ship Terminal Impacts
From: Councillor Ismet Tastan
Comment by the General Manager:
Answers to the questions will be provided at the Ordinary Council meeting in April 2025.
In the last 2 years Council has resolved to write and meet with the Minister for Transport seeking information and updates regarding shore power at the White Bay Cruise Ship Terminal and ongoing noise issues.
The first in September 2023 council resolved to write to the Minister for Transport seeking information about the following:
· when shore power is expected to become operational at White Bay Wharf 5;
· whether use of shore power will be mandatory for all cruise ships at White Bay Wharf 5 (once implemented) and if not, why not;
· what plans for future use of White Bay Wharf 4 are being made and whether shore power will be provided;
· what plans are being made to improve fuel quality used by cruise ships within Sydney Harbour;
· what fuel quality regulations will be required for ships at berth (i.e. during arrival and preparation for departure of cruise ships); and
· how the impact of noise from cruise ships on the local community will be addressed.
The second in the Mayoral Minute on April 9th 2024 relating to Ship to Shore Power at White Bay Cruise Passenger Terminal.
That Council write to Transport for NSW seeking an urgent meeting to discuss the implementation of shore to ship power at White Bay Cruise Passenger Terminal and propose the following:
a) the provision of shore to ship power at all berths that host cruise ships, including berths 4 and 5; and
b) the mandating of the use of shore to ship power by all cruise ships docked at White Bay.
Question
Did council receive a written response from the Minister for Transport in relation to the Sept 2023 resolution ? If so, please provide a copy of the response.
Question
Did the requested meeting as a result of the Mayoral Minute on April 9th with TfNSW go ahead?
a) If yes, what was the outcome of the meeting following the Mayoral minute on April 9th.
b) If not – what actions did Inner West Council undertake to follow up with TfNSW?
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: RFT 32-24 IWC Cleaning Services and Associated Products
Council at its meeting on 18 February 2025 resolved that the matter be deferred to the meeting to be held on 11 March 2025.
Prepared By: Con Loukaitis - Facilities Management Manager
Authorised By: Ryann Midei - Director Infrastructure
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
1: An ecologically sustainable Inner West 4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities 5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
Maintaining the cleanliness of iconic and innovative facilities of the Inner West council such as town halls, aquatic centres, public amenities, childcare centres, libraries and other community hubs is important to preserving their value and functionality for Council and the local community.
The tendered work includes the provision of cleaning services consisting of all necessary labour, equipment and uniforms as specified, to maintain the high standard of Inner West Council facilities.
Council will move into a closed session to deal with Inner West Council RFT 32-24 IWC Cleaning Services and Associated Products as the information is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(c) and (10A(2)(di) of the Local Government Act 1993. The matter is deemed that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
Pursuant to section 10A(2), 10(2) and 10A(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public will be excluded from the meeting on the basis the business to be considered is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(c) and section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993.
Confidential Report - RFT 32-24 - Cleaning Service and Associated Products Report - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
VendorPanel Evaluation Report RFT 32-24 - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: T2024-06 SSROC - Mattress Collection and Processing Tender
Prepared By: Erin White - Manager Resource Recovery and Fleet Services
Authorised By: Ryann Midei - Director Infrastructure
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
1: An ecologically sustainable Inner West 5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
DISCUSSION
Council will move into a closed session to deal with T2024-06 SSROC - Mattress Collection and Processing Tender as the information is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(c) and (10A(2)(di) of the Local Government Act 1993. The matter is deemed that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
Pursuant to section 10A(2), 10(2) and 10A(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public will be excluded from the meeting on the basis the business to be considered is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(c) and section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993.
Confidential Report - T2024-06 SSROC - Mattress Collection and Processing Tender - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
SSROC Mattress Collection and Processing Evaluation Report - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Sydney Gateway Project and Hand Back of Council Leased Land
Prepared By: Matthew Pearce - General Counsel
Authorised By: Peter Gainsford - General Manager
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
DISCUSSION
Council will move into a closed session to deal with Sydney Gateway Project and Hand Back of Council Leased Land as the information is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993. The matter is deemed that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
Pursuant to section 10A(2), 10(2) and 10A(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public will be excluded from the meeting on the basis the business to be considered is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993
Confidential Report - Sydney Gateway Project and Hand Back of Council Leased Land - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
Map identifying the Sydney Gateway Road within Inner West local government area - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
Map showing the Freehold Land owned by TfNSW and Council’s Leased lands - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
Map showing the location of the noise mounds and Tempe mound - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
Council Meeting 11 March 2025 |
Subject: Quarterly Strategic Investment Property Report
Prepared By: Scott Mullen - Strategic Investments and Property Manager
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This quarterly Strategic Investment Property report provides Council with updates on the performance of the Commercial Property Investment Portfolio for Council’s property at Liverpool and at Warrawong.
A summary of financial performance is provided below for each of the two properties. Further information of a confidential nature is provided in the confidential report.
The combined net income from investment properties for this quarter is $1,228,574
The data provided is to the end of quarter two of FY2024/25 (31 Dec 2024).
DISCUSSION
203 NORTHUMBERLAND STREET LIVERPOOL
A summary of the financial performance of the property is provided below:
Year to Date Revenue and Expenditure is shown on an Accrual Basis (From 1 July to 31 December 2024).
Revenue
· Total Income $1,867,210 vs Budget $1,761,472 which is over budget (favourable) by $104,528 (6%).
The additional revenue is predominantly related to office space (Suite 501) budgeted to be vacant and now leased to Neami and recovery of electricity for Level 5.
Expenses
· Total Building Expenses* $316,907 vs Budget $315,697 is over budget (unfavourable) by $1,210 (0.38%).
*Note Total Building Expenses includes Operating Expenditure, Direct Recoveries and Owner Expenditure
Capital Works
The revised planned capital budget for FY 2024/25 is $232K with the main items including mechanical, some works to the façade and waterproofing. Minor works commenced. Major works to commence Q3/Q4.
Monthly meetings are being held with Councils’ Property, Facility and Property Project teams and Knight Frank to scope and plan the procurement and completion of Capital Works.
The overall ten-year capital budget for the property, as detailed in the EY Due Diligence Analysis at time of purchase, has been incorporated into Council’s Long Term Financial Plan.
67 KING STREET WARRAWONG
A summary of the financial performance of the property is provided below:
Revenue
· Total Income $1,025,239 vs Budget $990,240 which is over budget (favourable) by $35,000 (3.53%).
The increased revenue is due to a CPI increase above budget for ISLHD.
Expenses
· Total Building Expenses* $253,683 vs Budget $245,162 which is over budget (unfavourable) by $8,521 (3.48%).
*Note Total Building Expenses includes Operating Expenditure, Direct Recoveries and Owner Expenditure
The increased expenditure includes $6,091 Directly Recoverable expenditure which is recovered from tenants and timing of repair and maintenance payments (whilst a budget allowance has been made for repair and maintenance items, an even phasing of the spend over the year had been assumed, however the cost will only be incurred when works are carried out).
Capital Works
The revised planned capital budget for FY 2024/25 is $278K with the main items including carpark resurfacing, some works to structural elements and roof finishes. Minor works commenced. Major works to commence Q3/Q4.
Monthly meetings are being held with councils Property, Facility and Property Project teams and Knight Frank to scope and plan the procurement and completion of Capital Works.
The overall ten-year capital budget for the property, as detailed in the EY Due Diligence Analysis at time of purchase, has been incorporated into Council’s Long Term Financial Plan.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
Council will move into closed session to deal with the Quarterly Strategic Investment Property Report for additional information which is classified as confidential under Section 10A(2)(d)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993. The matter is deemed confidential, as the matter is commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
Pursuant to section 10A(2), 10(2) and 10A(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public will be excluded from the meeting on the basis that the business to be considered is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(d)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993.
Confidential Report - Quarterly Report December 2024 - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business. |