|
AGENDA R |
Council Meeting
TUESDAY 29 APRIL 2025
6:30 PM
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Live Streaming of Council Meeting
In the spirit of open, accessible and transparent government, this meeting of the Inner West Council is being streamed live on Council’s website. By speaking at a Council meeting, members of the public agree to being recorded and must ensure their speech to the Council is respectful and use appropriate language. A person who uses defamatory, discriminatory or offensive language may be exposed to liability for which Council takes no responsibility. Any part of this meeting that is held in closed session will not be recorded.
Council meetings are streamed live on Council’s website. This allows our community greater access to Council proceedings, decisions and debate.
Pre-Registration to Speak at Council Meetings
Members of the public must register by 2pm of the day of the Meeting to speak at Council Meetings. If you wish to register to speak please fill in a Register to Speak Form, available from the Inner West Council website, including:
Are there any rules for speaking at a Council Meeting?
The following rules apply when addressing a Council meeting:
What happens after I submit the form?
You will be contacted by Governance Staff to confirm your registration. If you indicated that you will speak online, you will be provided with a link to the online meeting. Your request will then be added to a list that is shown to the Chairperson on the night of the meeting.
Where Items are deferred, Council reserves the right to defer speakers until that Item is heard on the next occasion.
Accessibility
Inner West Council is committed to ensuring people with a disability have equal opportunity to take part in Council and Committee Meetings. At the Council Chambers at Ashfield, there is a hearing loop service available to assist persons with a hearing impairment. If you have any other access or disability related participation needs and wish to know more, call 9392 5536.
Persons in the public gallery are advised that under the Local Government Act 1993, a person may NOT record a Council meeting without the permission of Council.
Any persons found recording without authority will be expelled from the meeting.
“Record” includes the use of any form of audio, video and still camera equipment or mobile phone capable of recording speech.
An audio recording of this meeting will be taken for the purpose of verifying the accuracy of the minutes.
Statement of Ethical Obligations
The Mayor and Councillors are bound by the Oath/ Affirmation of Office made at the start of the Council term to undertake their civic duties in the best interests of the people of the Inner West Council and to faithfully and impartially carry out the functions, powers, authorities and discretions vested in them under the Local Government Act or any other Act, to the best of their skill and judgement.
It is also a requirement that the Mayor and Councillors disclose conflicts of interest in relation to items listed for consideration on the Agenda or which are considered at this meeting in accordance with Council’s Code of Conduct and Code of Meeting Practice.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
|
AGENDA |
1 Acknowledgement of Country
2 Apologies and Request for Remote Attendance
3 Notice of Webcasting
4 Statement of Ethical Obligations
5 Disclosures of Interest (Part 4 (Pecuniary Interests) and Part 5 (non-pecuniary conflicts of interest) of Council’s Code of Conduct)
6 Moment
of Quiet Contemplation
7 Confirmation of Minutes Page
Minutes
of 11 March 2025
Council
7
8 Public Forum – Hearing from All Registered Speakers
9 Condolence Motions
Nil at the time of printing.
10 Mayoral Minutes
Nil at the time of printing.
11 Reports for Council Decision
ITEM Page
C0425(1) Item 1 Public Exhibition - Draft Community Strategic Plan, Draft Delivery Program and Operational Plan 2025-29 and Draft Long Term Financial Plan 2025-34; and Adoption - Community Engagement Strategy 2025-29 33
C0425(1) Item 2 Inner West LEP - Update and Proposed Engagement Plan 426
C0425(1) Item 3 Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Stage 2 Upgrade 430
C0425(1) Item 4 Mort Bay Park Upgrade - Pickleball and Tennis Practice Wall 451
C0425(1) Item 5 Proposed Streetscape Improvements at The Boulevarde, Lilyfield 456
C0425(1) Item 6 Local Traffic Committee Meeting - 17 March 2025 462
C0425(1) Item 7 Minutes of the Flood Management Advisory Committee of 26 February 2025 and Appointment of Community Representatives 479
C0425(1) Item 8 Expanding Jazz in the Park 489
C0425(1) Item 9 Burwood Council Proposed Boundary Changes Around Presbyterian Ladies College Croydon 493
C0425(1) Item 10 Rozelle Parklands 498
C0425(1) Item 11 Illegally Blocked Driveways 501
C0425(1) Item 12 Leichhardt Oval Renovation Update 503
C0425(1) Item 13 Post Exhibition – 1-13 Parramatta Road, Annandale - Deed of Variation for Planning Agreement 513
C0425(1) Item 14 Investment Policy Update 536
C0425(1) Item 15 Public Exhibition - Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy 561
C0425(1) Item 16 Public Exhibition - Draft Media and Social Media Policy 583
C0425(1) Item 17 Public Exhibition - Draft Lobbying Policy 601
C0425(1) Item 18 Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee - Minutes and Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest First Returns 613
C0425(1) Item 19 Development Assessment Initiatives to Improve Housing Supply 639
C0425(1) Item 20 Draft Economic Development Budget 2025-26 655
C0425(1) Item 21 Public Exhibition - Draft Economic Development Strategy 660
12 Reports for Noting
ITEM Page
C0425(1) Item 22 Proposed Tourism Action Plan Expenditure and Bi-monthly update on Brewers and Distillers Action Plan 692
C0425(1) Item 23 Supporting the launch of Balmain Markets 698
C0425(1) Item 24 Investment Report at 28 February 2025 700
C0425(1) Item 25 Investment Report at 31 March 2025 752
C0425(1) Item 26 Celebrating the Vietnamese Community in Marrickville 805
C0425(1) Item 27 Murrell Street, Ashfield - Traffic Study 808
C0425(1) Item 28 Railway Avenue, Stanmore - Review of Traffic Accidents Adjacent to the Railway Avenue Cycleway 812
C0425(1) Item 29 Bins and Cleaner Streets 845
C0425(1) Item 30 Flooding in the area of Northcote Street, Marrickville 849
C0425(1) Item 31 Installation of Lockers at the Dawn Fraser Baths 853
C0425(1) Item 32 Mandatory Reporting to Council of Report received from Fire & Rescue NSW - 425 Liverpool Road Ashfield 856
13 Notices of Motion
ITEM Page
C0425(1) Item 33 Notice of Motion: National General Assembly of Local Government 2025 867
C0425(1) Item 34 Notice of Motion: Pedestrian Crossing - Park Road Marrickville 868
C0425(1) Item 35 Notice of Motion: Sydenham, Tempe Safety and dumping problems 874
C0425(1) Item 36 Notice of Motion: Open Space for Tempe 877
C0425(1) Item 37 Notice of Motion: Marrickville Road Urgent Maintenance 880
C0425(1) Item 38 Notice of Motion: Taxis in South Marrickville 885
C0425(1) Item 39 Notice of Motion: Reaffirming our commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion 886
C0425(1) Item 40 Notice of Motion: In-road Tree Planting 888
C0425(1) Item 41 Notice of Motion: Camperdown Commons 892
C0425(1) Item 42 Notice of Motion: Garbage Bins - Footpath Blockage 908
C0425(1) Item 43 Notice of Motion: Active Super Greenwashing 911
C0425(1) Item 44 Notice of Motion: Raised pedestrian crossing at Darley Road near Allen Street, Leichhardt 913
C0425(1) Item 45 Notice of Motion: Inner West pedestrian and cyclist street furniture and parking audit 915
C0425(1) Item 46 Notice of Motion: Reverse Garbage 50th Anniversary 916
C0425(1) Item 47 Notice of Motion: Lighting in Marrickville Parks 917
C0425(1) Item 48 Notice of Motion: East Tempe Parking 918
C0425(1) Item 49 Notice of Motion: Camdenville Oval Koori Knockout Blue Plaque 919
C0425(1) Item 50 Notice of Motion: Improved Collaboration with Homes NSW on rubbish dumping on and outside public housing properties 920
14 Questions From Councillors
ITEM Page
C0425(1) Item 51 Question on Notice: White Bay Cruise Ship Terminal Impacts 922
C0425(1) Item 52 Question on Notice: Synthetic Turf 928
C0425(1) Item 53 Question on Notice: SUV use in the Inner West 929
15 Reports with Confidential Information
Reports appearing in this section of the Business Paper contain confidential information in attachments.
The confidential information has been circulated separately.
ITEM Page
C0425(1) Item 54 Sydney Gateway Project and Hand Back of Council Leased Land 931
C0425(1) Item 55 Sydney Gateway - Lease of Industrial Lands - Tempe 933
C0425(1) Item 56 RFT 41-24 Insurance Services 935
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Minutes of
Ordinary Council Meeting held on 11 March 2025 at
Ashfield Service Centre
Meeting commenced at 6.33pm
|
Present: |
|
|
Darcy Byrne Mat Howard Izabella Antoniou Liz Atkins Olivia Barlow Andrew Blake Jo Carlisle Vicki Clay Jessica D’Arienzo Kerrie Fergusson Victor Macri Vittoria Raciti Philippa Scott Chloe Smith Ismet Tastan Simone Plummer |
Mayor Deputy Mayor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor General Manager Director Planning |
|
Ryann Midei |
Director Infrastructure |
|
Ruth Callaghan Chris Sleiman Julian Sakarai Erin White Scott Mullen Manod Wickramasinghe Sarah Guan Megan Jenkins |
Director Community Acting Director Corporate Acting Senior Manager Governance and Risk Resource Recovery and Fleet Manager Strategic Investments and Property Manager Traffic and Transport Planning Manager Strategic Transport Planner Senior Lawyer |
|
Katherine Paixao Darcie Huisman |
Business Paper Coordinator Business Paper Officer |
APOLOGIES AND REQUEST FOR REMOTE PARTICIPATION:
Nil.
DISCLOSURES OF INTEREST:
Councillor Barlow declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 9 - Local Traffic Committee Meeting - 17 February 2025 as she works in the Office of Kobi Shetty MP, who in her capacity as the member for Balmain, has a representative on the Traffic Committee. She will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter as the vote is exercised through a representative.
Councillor Smith declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 29 - Notice of Motion: Inner West e-Bike Strategy and shared e-Bike provider round table due to her partner’s business associates who work in the e-Bike and bike share industry. She will remain in the chamber to vote, as it is currently not clear whether her partner or his business associates will be affected by a decision on this matter.
Councillor D’Arienzo declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 43 - RFT 32-24 IWC Cleaning Services and Associated Products out of an abundance of caution, as a tenderer approached her and sought to raise unsolicited comments about the tender process. She ended the conversation and did not provide the tenderer with any information. She will remain in the chamber to vote as she was not provided with any information about the tender process by the tenderer.
Clr Antoniou declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 43 - RFT 32-24 IWC Cleaning Services and Associated Products out of an abundance of caution, as a tenderer approached her and sought to raise unsolicited comments about the tender process. She ended the conversation and did not provide the tenderer with any information. She will remain in the meeting to vote as she was not provided with any information about the tender process by the tenderer.
Motion: (Scott/Howard)
That Council note the disclosures of interest.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
|
That the Minutes of the Council held on Tuesday, 18 February 2025 be confirmed as a correct record.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
PUBLIC FORUM
The registered speakers were asked to address the meeting. The list of speakers is available on the last page of these minutes.
Councillor Howard left the meeting at 7:35pm
Councillor Clay left the meeting at 7:36pm
Councillor Barlow left the meeting at 7:38pm
Councillor Howard returned to the meeting at 7:39pm
Councillor Barlow returned to the meeting at 7:40pm
Councillor Clay returned to the meeting at 7:40pm
The Mayor, Councillor Byrne left the meeting at 7:41pm and vacated the Chair. The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Howard assumed the Chair.
Councillor Scott left the meeting at 7:42pm
Councillor Antoniou left the meeting at 7:48pm
Councillor Antoniou returned to the meeting at 7:50pm
Councillor Scott returned to the meeting at 7:50pm
Councillor Tastan left the meeting at 7:55pm
The Mayor, Councillor Byrne returned to the meeting at 7:55pm. The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Howard vacated the Chair and the Mayor, Councillor Byrne assumed the Chair.
Councillor Tastan returned to the meeting at 7:56pm
Procedural Motion (Howard/Atkins)
That Council Suspend Standing Orders to bring forward the following items to be dealt with at this time:
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Procedural Motion (Howard/Atkins)
That the following items be moved in globo and the recommendations contained within the reports be adopted:
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
|
That Council abolish the waitlist fee for Early Childhood Services where applicable.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
|
1. That Council publicly exhibit the draft Code of Conduct for a period of 28 days and seek community feedback on the proposed Policy.
2. That following the conclusion of the exhibition period, the draft Code of Conduct be brought back to Council for consideration for adoption.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
|
That Council receive and note the report.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
|
That Council receive and note the report.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
|
1. That Council implement the following winter hours for sporting ground flood lighting use in order to facilitate dog walking after dark in winter on the following basis: a) Mondays no lighting other than Mackey Park and Henson Park; b) Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays and Fridays - 5pm- 9pm; and c) Saturdays and Sundays – no lighting except: i. 5pm-10pm on all-weather synthetic surfaces subject to Council approval; ii. on natural turf grounds for finals series games, or for general competition and one-off events subject to approval by Council.
2. That Council continue to undertake detailed placemaking in park master plans and park upgrades, to ensure safety by design considerations are embedded in park master plans including the provision of lighting to Australian Standards on pathways, identified hotspots and key pedestrian routes.
3. That Council effectively and immediately communicates the intended purpose of the extended lighting is for individual recreational use and that sporting grounds must not be used for organised sport over and above seasonal hire agreements.
4. That Council conduct a post-implementation review after October 2025 that includes the impact on biodiversity, sporting ground condition and usage.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
Procedural Motion (Byrne/Carlisle)
That Council allow Clr Howard to speak for 1 additional minute on Item 5.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
|
1. That Council endorse the phased trial of FOGO and Recycling in Parks, commencing with Phase 1 at Enmore Park and Pioneers Park Leichhardt.
2. That Council include the following parks in phase 2 should it proceed: a) Petersham Park, Petersham (Stanmore-Damun Ward); b) Gladstone Park (Balmain-Baludarri Ward); c) Darryl Jackson Gardens, Summer Hill (Ashfield-Djarrawunang Ward); d) Enmore Park, Enmore (Marrickville-Midjuburi Ward - continuing from phase 1); and e) Pioneers Park, Leichhardt (Leichhardt-Gulgadya Ward - continuing from phase 1).
3. That as part of the trial, Council monitor and if necessary increase service levels.
4. That Council commit the required funding for the trial which is detailed in the funding implications of this report in the draft 2025/26 budget.
5. That Council provide a further report to the April 2025 Council meeting with a proposal to: a) increase the number of bins on local streets and in parks and the service levels for bins; b) increase the service levels for high pressure cleaning in town centres; and c) establish a “Street Blitz team” to focus maintenance and cleaning of main streets similar to that offered by Randwick City Council.
6. That Council commit to one mobile customer service stall in each of the Phase 1 trial parks prior to the commencement of the trial, and, in the event Phase 1 is successful, additional mobile customer service stalls in each of the Phase 2 parks prior to extension of the trial.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
Procedural Motion (Byrne/Carlisle)
That Council allow Clr Smith to speak for 2 additional minutes on Item 15.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Procedural Motion (Byrne/Clay)
That the meeting be adjourned for 5 minutes.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
The meeting was adjourned at 8.30pm
The meeting recommenced at 8.36pm
Councillor D'Arienzo left the meeting at 8:36pm
Councillor Blake left the meeting at 8:37pm
Councillor D'Arienzo returned to the meeting at 8:38pm
Councillor Blake returned to the meeting at 8:39pm
Procedural Motion (Byrne/D’Arienzo)
That Council allow Clr Smith to speak for 1 additional minute on Item 19.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
|
1. That Council receive and note the report.
2. That Council allocate funding of $50,000 to the small grants program to support clubs with minor infrastructure projects who have either signed the pledge to, or already transitioned away from, reliance on poker machine revenue. Part of this funding is to be repurposed from the existing small grants pool and the Communities directorate budget, with the rest identified as part of 2025/26 budget considerations.
3. That Council allocate additional funding to the Network for initiatives to support local clubs identified through the consultation process, with an amount to be determined as part of 2025/26 budget considerations.
4. That Council consult with the Network on developing a Terms of Reference for the Network, including but not limited to: a) support for clubs who express interest in transitioning away from reliance on poker machine revenue to do so, b) support for clubs to be designated as Special Entertainment Precincts and host more live music and diverse events, c) support with minor infrastructure projects and maintenance, d) other areas identified in consultation with the Network.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
|
1. That Council receive and note the report.
2. That Council approve the two-year licenses for the successful applicants, subject to due diligence assessment by staff.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
Councillor Raciti left the meeting at 8:50pm
Councillor Raciti returned to the meeting at 8:53pm
|
C0325(1) Item 26 Notice of Motion: Murrell Street, Ashfield Traffic Safety Review |
Procedural Motion (Atkins/Tastan)
That Council allow Clr Antoniou to speak for 2 additional minutes on Item 41.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Confidential session
Procedural Motion (Howard/Carlisle)
That Council enter into Confidential session.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Procedural Motion (Howard/Smith)
That Council move back into the Open Session of the Council meeting.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Confidential Session
That in accordance with Section 10A(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, the following matters be considered in Closed Session of Council for the reasons provided:
C0325(1) Item 43 RFT 32-24 IWC Cleaning Services and Associated Products (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
C0325(1) Item 45 Sydney Gateway Project and Hand Back of Council Leased Land (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
C0325(1) Item 46 Quarterly Strategic Investment Property Report (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
resolutions passed during closed session
Meeting closed at 9.56pm.
Public Speakers:
|
Item #
|
Speaker |
Suburb |
|
Item 2: |
Trent Thomas Chris Fogarty Tara O’Connell Louise Appel Cameron Coombs Jimmy Oliveira |
Ashfield Croydon Croydon Lilyfield Marrickville Ashfield |
|
Item 3: |
Danielle Blakely Nick Crang |
Sydney Brisbane |
|
Item 6: |
Matthew Bowen Louise Appel John Stamolis Thomas Britton Paul Avery Daniel Haigh |
Lewisham Lilyfield Balmain Balmain Balmain Balmain |
|
Item 10: |
Donyale Harrison Alison Vicary Helen Videnovic Droudis |
Marrickville Marrickville Earlwood |
|
Item 14: |
Noel Corkery |
Marrickville |
|
Item 22: |
Dr Philip Drew |
Annandale |
|
Item 30: |
Keith Stallard Eloise Gilding Emily Chieza |
Balmain Balmain Balmain East |
|
Item 41: |
Nicole Rawson Emily Lockwood |
Ashfield Summer Hill |
***Tabled letter for Item 41 - Notice of Motion: Rezoning of additional former WestConnex dive sites for mixed residential development***
Unconfirmed minutes of the Ordinary Council meeting held on 11 March 2025.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Public Exhibition - Draft Community Strategic Plan, Draft Delivery Program and Operational Plan 2025-29 and Draft Long Term Financial Plan 2025-34; and Adoption - Community Engagement Strategy 2025-29
Prepared By: Prue Foreman - Corporate Strategy and Engagement Manager and Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
Authorised By: Ruth Callaghan - Director Community
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council endorse for public exhibition of 28 days the: a) Draft Community Strategic Plan – Our Inner West 2041 b) Draft Delivery Program 2025-29 and Operational Plan and Budget 2025/26 (including Fees and Charges 2025/26); and c) Draft Long Term Financial Plan 2025-35.
2. That Council receive a report of the public exhibition outcomes and the final draft plans for adoption at the June 2025 Council meeting.
3. That Council note the outcomes of the public exhibition of the Community Participation Plan and adopt the revised Community Engagement Strategy 2025-29.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report presents key strategic plans which are part of the Integrated Planning and Reporting Framework (IP&R) for Council’s consideration. The plans have been developed, as required by legislation, following the local government elections in September 2024. The plans must be finalised by 30 June 2025.
Three plans are presented for Council’s endorsement of
public exhibition, as required under the Local Government Act. These are the:
· Community Strategic Plan (CSP)
· Delivery Program 2025-29 and Operational Plan and Budget 2025/26
· Long Term Financial Plan 2025-35 (LTFP)
This report also presents the revised Community Engagement Strategy for adoption. The Community Engagement Strategy contains the Community Participation Plan which governs community engagement for land use planning. The Community Participation Plan was publicly exhibited as required by legislation, the outcomes of which are discussed in the report.
BACKGROUND
Council is required to review its IP&R documents in full after each election. The plans which are required to be adopted/endorsed by 30 June 2025 include the Community Strategic Plan, Delivery Program, Operational Plan (and Budget), and the Resourcing Strategy components – the Long Term Financial Plan, Asset Management Strategy and Plans, and Workforce Management Plan. The review of the Community Strategic Plan must also incorporate a review of the Community Engagement Strategy.
Following public exhibition, the Community Strategic Plan, Delivery Program and Operational Plan, and Long Term Financial Plan will be reported to Council’s June meeting for approval. The Asset Management Strategy and Plans, and Workforce Management Plan, which do not require public exhibition will also be reported to Council’s June meeting for approval.
In addition, the Community Engagement Strategy was reviewed as required. The Community Participation Plan section (for land use planning) was publicly exhibited as resolved by Council at its meeting on 18 February 2025:
1. That Council publicly exhibit the draft Community Participation Plan for a period of 28 days and seek community feedback on the proposed Plan.
2. That following the conclusion of the exhibition period, the draft Community Participation Plan be brought back to Council for consideration for adoption as part of the Community Engagement Strategy.
DISCUSSION
Under the Local Government Act 1993, councils are required to develop a suite of plans as part of the ‘Integrated Planning and Reporting Framework’ (IP&R). IP&R is a rigorous and consistent system of community planning across all NSW local councils which also takes into consideration State and regional priorities. IP&R assists councils in delivering their community’s vision through long, medium and short term plans.
After each Council election, the CSP must be reviewed and refreshed and the new Delivery Program, and Resourcing Strategy for the term developed. The Community Engagement Strategy must also be reviewed as part of this process. In 2024 and 2025, specific community and internal engagement took place to inform the refresh of the plans and the development of the newly elected Council’s Delivery Program.
Community, councillors and stakeholders participated in engagement activities to refresh the CSP vision, confirm the strategic directions and outcomes, identify top priorities and express what makes the Inner West unique. Key engagement activities included a Deliberative Forum of 99 representative community members, a combined Local Democracy Groups workshop, community stalls at Council’s major events, and internal workshops. All feedback was collated, analysed and themed, and informed the draft documents that are the subject of this report.
Three components of the suite are presented to Council for endorsement of public exhibition for community comment:
· Community Strategic Plan (CSP), Our Inner West 2041, identifies the community’s vision for the future, long term outcomes the community aspires to achieve, and strategies to get there. Although Council takes the lead in developing the plan on behalf of the community, many external partner agencies are required to deliver.
The reviewed CSP includes a refreshed community vision statement, five strategic directions (unchanged from previous CSP), 18 outcomes and 44 strategies (high level actions). Progress will be monitored through 89 indicators, including several new indicators responding to improved data availability.
· Delivery Program 2025-29 outlines the elected Council’s commitment to achieving the outcomes and strategies of the CSP and delivering all of Council’s functions during its term of office. The Delivery Program is combined with the one-year Operational Plan 2025/26 which contains detailed actions and performance measures for the year, and the Statement of Revenue Policy (including annual budget). The Delivery Program/Operational Plan is reviewed and updated annually.
The new
Delivery Program and Operational Plan contains 113 Principal Activities, 129
actions and 143 KPIs. It also contains the adopted Council priorities which
will be operationalised and tracked throughout the term of Council. All
actions, measures and priorities will be monitored through quarterly progress
reports and Annual Reports to Council.
· Long Term Financial Plan 2025-35 (LTFP) sets out the ten year budget forecast, underlying assumptions, sensitivity analysis, financial modelling for possible scenarios and methods of monitoring financial performance. The LTFP is reviewed and updated annually.
Public Exhibition of Community Strategic Plan, Delivery Program and Operational Plan, and Long Term Financial Plan
Under the Local Government Act, the draft documents are required to be publicly exhibited for a minimum of 28 days. The draft documents will be available for viewing at Council’s service centres, libraries and online at Your Say Inner West. The public exhibition will be promoted through Council’s communication channels, including social media.
Following public exhibition, all community comments will be analysed, and adjustments made to the draft documents if required for the elected Council’s consideration. Community input and final drafts will be reported to Council at its meeting in June 2025.
Community Engagement Strategy and Community Participation Plan
All NSW councils are required to adopt a Community Engagement Strategy which sets out Council’s approach to engaging the community in the development of its plans, policies, programs and key activities. The Community Engagement Strategy was reviewed in accordance with IP&R requirements by December 2024. Updates were made based on feedback from the Deliberative Forum, new content to address best practice and inclusion of Council priorities for the term. Updates to the design include enhancements for readability, inclusion of community quotes for veracity and new images. The time period of the updated Community Engagement Strategy aligns with the new IP&R cycle - 2025-2029.
NSW councils are also required to adopt a Community Participation Plan for land use planning. NSW Guidelines advise that it is best practice for the two documents to be combined. Hence the Inner West Community Participation Plan is combined with the Inner West Community Engagement Strategy.
In 2025, amendments were made to the Community Participation Plan as reported to Council at its February 2025 meeting. The updates include a new section on the notification process for planning proposals and development control plans. This sets out how Council will notify the community about planning proposals that have received a Gateway determination to proceed, and draft development control plans. The revised Plan was placed on public exhibition as required under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act. The outcomes of the public exhibition are as follows.
During the public exhibition period between 27 February 2025 and 27 March 2025, there were:
· 5 submissions through Your Say Inner West, 4 of which supported the draft plan
· 1,162 visits to the Your Say Inner West project page
· 357 downloads of the exhibition materials
Following the public exhibition, officers reviewed the submissions received and determined that as a result, no changes to the draft are required.
The final draft Community Engagement Strategy incorporating the Community Participation Plan is presented to Council for adoption.
Draft Operational Plan and Budget 2025/26
Section three of the plan provides details about the draft budget and rating for 2025/26 to 2028/29. The draft Fees & Charges for 2025/26 is an appendix to the plan. In 2025/26, Council is budgeting total income before capital grants and contributions of $310.9m and expenses of $310.0m resulting in a surplus of $0.9m, or 0.30% of total expenditure. Below is a summary of how Council has budgeted to spend rates and other income in 2025/26 for every $100 received.
The key drivers of the draft budget include:
· IPART setting the 2025/26 Rate PEG for Inner West Council at 3.7%.
· Maintaining the current Domestic Waste Management reserve.
· Fees and Charges for 2025/26 being indexed at 3.8% unless stated overwise. Over the 10 year LTFP this is forecast to reduce to 2.5%.
· Increase of salaries and wages by 3.0% plus a lump sum payment of $1,000 or 0.5% of employees salary (whichever is greater) as per the three year State Award which commenced in July 2023.
· Provision of adequate budget for the maintenance of Council facilities under its control.
In future years, Council is budgeting an increasing surplus after expenses and revenue are stabilised. Four-year surplus are as follows:
o 2025/26 $0.9m surplus
o 2026/27 $1.5m surplus
o 2027/28 $1.5m surplus
o 2028/29 $0.2m surplus
In 2025/26, Council is budgeting to spend $119.2m on capital expenditure. Whilst continuing to maintain a high renewal of infrastructure of Council assets, other major projects include:
· Leichhardt Oval
· Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Major Project
· Callan Park All Weather Sporting Field
· Henson Park Grandstand Stage 2
· GreenWay Program
· Main Street Revitalisation
· Cooks River Lighting
· Inclusive Playgrounds
· Mackey Park Sporting Ground Upgrade
· Steel Park Sporting Ground Upgrade
· Mort Bay Park
· Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan Implementation
Four-year capital expenditure is:
o 2025/26 $119.2m
o 2026/27 $144.5m
o 2027/28 $75.7m
o 2028/29 $63.9m
The draft Fees & Charges for 2025/26 are attached and provide for a general increase of 3.7%. Select fees have varied from the standard increase after considering other factors such as community benefits and costs of providing services. Other fees may not have changed, for example statutory fees are as determined. Council’s Fees & Charges have been classified under directorates and service units. Attachment 6 includes a Fees & Charges Change Log that lists new or deleted fees and charges, changes of wording or where there is an increase/decrease of more than 5%.
Long Term Financial Plan 2025-35
In accordance with the IP&R guidelines, the LTFP is required to include:
· projected income and expenditure, balance sheet and cash flow statement
· planning assumptions
· sensitivity analysis, highlighting factors and assumptions most likely to impact the LTFP
· financial modelling for different scenarios
· methods of monitoring financial performance
· major capital and operational expenditure implications.
The draft Long Term Financial Plan for 2025-35 sets out two scenarios in which each, at the very least, maintain current service levels and establish a balanced budget. These are:
· Scenario 1 – Business as Usual, maintain existing service levels: In this scenario, Council continues to operate at the existing service levels to the community and maintaining the capital works program to ensure infrastructure is renewed or upgraded over the 10 years. This scenario also ensures that Council is financial sustainable by ensuring there are funds available to deliver infrastructure and services to the community. Over the life of the LTFP, the surplus cumulate to be $15.0M.
· Scenario 2 – Addresses the Infrastructure Asset Renewal Backlog: In this alternative scenario, Council continues to provide its services to the community as per scenario 1 with the addition of a process to reduce the current infrastructure backlog of $29.3m from the 2023/24 financial statements over the course of the LTFP. The majority of the planned infrastructure spend is spread over the 10-year LTFP and results in this scenario showing that Council would be in a general funds deficit by 2026/27 financial year, so would require a loan of approximately $23.0M to cover the deficit.
Key highlights in the recommended scenario 1 LTFP include Council achieving a surplus for 10 years, and key performance indicators including the Unrestricted Current Ratio, Debt Service Ratio and Infrastructure Backlog Ratio all exceeding their performance benchmarks for the full ten years.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Council’s commitments in the Community Strategic Plan, Delivery Program and Operational Plan are resourced as outlined in annual budgets and forecast in the Long Term Financial Plan.
Attachment 4 has been published separately in the Attachments Document on Council’s Website https://www.innerwest.nsw.gov.au/about/the-council/council-meetings/current-council-meetings
|
1.⇩ |
Draft CSP Public Exhibition version |
|
2.⇩ |
Draft DPOP 2025 Public Exhibition version |
|
3.⇩ |
Draft Community Engagement Strategy 2025-29 including Community Participation Plan |
|
4.⇨ |
Community Participation Plan - Public Exhibition outcomes
report |
|
5.⇩ |
2025-26 Fees and Charges |
|
6.⇩ |
2025-26 Fees & Charges Change Log |
|
7.⇩ |
2025 - 2035 Draft Long Term Financial Plan |
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Inner West LEP - Update and Proposed Engagement Plan
Prepared By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
Authorised By: Peter Gainsford - General Manager
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council endorse the proposed community engagement plan for the Local Government Area (LGA) wide planning changes that are Inner West Council’s response to the Housing Emergency.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport 5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Council has committed to bringing forward new planning controls that address the housing emergency based on 14 planning principles that were consulted with and supported by the Inner West community.
That work is now complete except for the final testing of one essential digital mapping tool. This new mapping tool is intuitive to use and will enable residents to interrogate their property and understand the Inner West planning controls that currently apply and that are proposed for their property. Without this tool residents will need to interrogate a complex series of paper and pdf maps and reference their property on the DPHI Planning Portal. For some properties as many as 6 or 7 map sets may apply.
The Council wide LEP will be brought to the May Ordinary meeting of Council in order to finalise the digital mapping tool. This also enables a draft community engagement plan to be considered by Council through this report. The new planning controls are complex and represent Council’s alternative approach to the recent NSW State Government Housing Reforms. This complexity requires a thoughtful and clear plan for community and stakeholder engagement, to facilitate the opportunity for the community to consider and respond to the planning proposal.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 21 May 2024, Council resolved the following in part:
a. Delivering place-based planning through local planning controls.
b. Upzoning of precincts around Ashfield, Croydon, Dulwich Hill, and Marrickville train stations.
c. Support for increased densities on main streets through shop top housing in order to protect high value heritage conservation areas from upzoning.
d. Providing density incentives for the amalgamation of lands in areas identified for upzoning.
e. Increased residential densities around light rail stations.
f. The finalisation of the Parramatta Road Corridor Stage 1 program through the rezoning of parts of Leichhardt, Taverners Hill and Kings Bay precincts.
g. Support for the suburb of Haberfield being listed on the State Heritage register and being excluded from upzoning.
h. Support for the Master Planning of the Bays Precinct with dwelling targets to be determined on Government owned land prior to consideration of any additional rezoning in adjoining suburbs.
i. Support for the NSW Government policy of 30% of all new housing on government owned land to be maintained in perpetuity as public housing.
j. Setting a target of 1,000 or more new public housing dwellings to be delivered on State Government and Council owned land.
k. Incentives for the conversion of land owned by religious and faith-based organisations for social and affordable housing.
l. Approval of the new Special Entertainment Precincts which Council is currently undertaking consultation on.
m. Protecting and expanding existing employment lands to attract increased employment and new industries.
n. Incorporating the State Government’s Pattern Book for improved design into Council’s planning controls.
In October 2024 Council officers brought back to Council an Engagement Outcomes Report that demonstrated strong support for a planning approach based on these principles.
In December 2024 the Council resolved to seek a deferral from the Minister of Planning, Housing and Industry of the Transport Oriented Development and Low to Mid Rise Housing Reforms while awaiting a new suite of planning controls that will deliver sufficient new development to address the housing emergency. In terms of the TODs Inner West Council received a deferral until December 2024.
All levels of Government have made commitments and taken action to address the housing emergency. The Federal Government provided significant grant funding to local government to assist with relevant planning and all levels of government have committed to a housing target – for the Inner West Council this target is 7,800 dwellings constructed by 2029.
DISCUSSION
In 2024 the Federal Government released a grant opportunity which all local government were eligible to apply for under the Housing Support Program Stream 1. This Federal fund provided a grant to Inner West Council of $2.6M for strategic planning work and a further $400,000 for a digital mapping tool. Council was required to provide in kind support and council officers have been working to identify areas of opportunity for uplift in order to develop local controls that met or exceeded the housing projected by the TODs and LMR reforms. This work is complete, and implementation of a new digital mapping tool is also nearing completion that will be critical in the successful engagement and information sharing with the community.
The digital mapping tool will clearly illustrate the current and proposed Inner West planning controls, and accordingly the masterplan and associated documents will be brought to the May meeting of Council, once this tool is complete. The digital mapping tool is considered essential to meaningful community engagement because it brings together on a screen the relevant planning information on a site by site basis. Without such a tool either paper map books or navigating a series of pdf links is required and for some properties more than 7 map sets may apply which is both onerous and complex.
The purpose of the community engagement is to
· Inform the community about the proposed planning changes with clear and easy to understand information
· Inform the community about Council decision making in line with the Planning Principles
· Inform the community about impacts to their individual properties, local suburb and the wider LGA
· Consult the community to seek public feedback on the proposed planning changes
· Involve the public in the review process to ensure that their concerns and aspirations are understood and considered in the finalisation of the new planning controls.
Proposed Community Engagement Plan
Community engagement is proposed to commence the day following the Council meeting, on 21 May with the launch of digital tools and “go live” of online information. Drop in sessions will be held throughout June and engagement is proposed to end 1 July 2025.
Notification and promotion
A letter to all residential properties in the LGA will advise of the commencement of the engagement period. The letter will direct residents to the webpage where they may identify a drop in session that is most convenient for them to attend and also how to register to “meet the planner” to ask specific questions. “Frequently Asked Questions” documentation and a pamphlet or post card will also be important collateral for council staff who are not planning experts to direct residents to the relevant information on the planning changes and to an appropriate drop in session.
The engagement will be advertised across Council’s social media, website and collateral such as newsletters and digital posters. A thorough communications campaign is being developed in order to help residents understand the need for these changes and to direct them to the appropriate location to access more relevant information, including information in languages other than English.
Proposed Drop In Locations:
· Balmain Library
· Leichhardt Service Centre
· Ashfield Service Centre
· Petersham Service Centre
· Marrickville Library
· Dulwich Hill Library
Sessions Times:
· Weekday evenings 5:30 pm – 8:30 pm
· Saturdays either 9:00 am -11:00 am / 1:00 pm -3:00 pm or half day 9.30am - 12.30pm
· Each ward has two sessions, a weeknight and weekend session
· More sessions can be added within the engagement period where sessions are oversubscribed
In addition, over the consultation period, drop-in sessions will be available at the Ashfield Service Centre on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays between 9:30am–11:30am. Flexibility is being built into resourcing the drop-in to accommodate additional demand when a particular session/s are oversubscribed
Session Format:
Sessions formats will be a mix of viewing a display or asking specific questions. Strategic planning staff will support the sessions by ensuring staff are on hand to explain the displays, assist attendees to navigate the website and answer questions at the 1:1. Attendees have the option to view the display hosted by a planner or register online for a "meet the planner session”- 1:1 or small group.
Website Landing page and Your Say
In the lead up to the Council meeting the website landing page will be updated and following the Council meeting the Your Say Inner West Community Engagement Web page will be launched.
Your Say Inner West will be the primary forum for the community to access information, key messages and FAQs. Phone and email contact details will also be provided and the page will host the full suite of documents as well as the online mapping tool, identify where and when drop in sessions will be held as well as how to register. An online survey plus the opportunity to lodge a written submission will be available via this engagement page.
Online Survey
A community survey, hosted on the Your Say Inner West page, will provide an opportunity to provide feedback about the proposed changes and how they may impact the local community.
Engagement Outcomes Reporting
It is anticipated that there will be a high level of interest and participation in community engagement for this project. Following each session general feedback from the session will be recorded. Those wishing to make a formal submission will be directed to the Your Say page where they can lodge a submission, and for those who seek assistance planners either at the drop in session or at the morning sessions at Ashfield Service Centre will assist. Those who require assistance in another language will also be offered this support through a more formal meeting with translation services available.
Feedback received as a formal submission through the Your Say Inner West website and the community survey will be collated, analysed and assessed and a detailed Engagement Outcomes Report will be prepared for Council. The feedback received from the engagement process will be considered and amendments to the planning controls will be made as appropriate to reflect community feedback. Updated documents will then be lodged with Council for review and finalisation
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The actions outlined in the draft engagement plan is via the Strategic Planning engagement budget for this project, which is funded via the Federal Grant – Housing Support Program Stream 1.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Stage 2 Upgrade
Prepared By: Stuart Hull - Senior Manager Capital Works
Authorised By: Ryann Midei - Director Property and Major Projects
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council adopt the revised conceptual designs in Attachment 2 for Stage 2 of the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre.
2. That Council endorse proceeding with
detailed design development, planning approval and delivery stages for
the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Upgrade
3. That Council note that the required funding detailed in the funding implications of this report for the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Upgrade is included in the draft 2025/26 operational plan and budget.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport 4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report highlights the outcomes of community engagement for the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Upgrade Stage 2 and provides a construction update on Stage 1.
Stage 2 of the LPAC upgrade includes the construction of new heated 8-lane 50m pool (1.1 to 1.8m deep) and a 25m heated pool (from zero to 2.1m depth with movable floor and accessible device), spectator seating and shade structures, new first aid, lifeguard, and storage rooms, new fully electrified pool heating system and filtration plants for 50 m and 25 m pools, accessibility lift and upgraded stairs to access the rear turfed area along with re-turfing, accessible pathway link and new picnic shelter.
From 8 November 2024 to 31 January 2025, the community was invited to provide feedback on the proposed conceptual designs for Stage 2 of the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre (LPAC) upgrade through Council’s “Your Say” platform. The engagement platform was promoted through a flyer distribution, social media, direct email, Active Inner West newsletter and on-site A1 Corflute signage. Eleven onsite information stalls were held during the community engagement.
During the 11-week engagement period, there were 9,260 visits to the Your Say Inner West Project Page. Overall, the engagement period saw 572 submissions or comments received. This included 265 people who provided feedback via the information stalls, 135 people from Your Say page and 172 people who provided feedback through emails, Facebook, or Instagram.
The engagement indicated that 60% of those who responded supported the Stage 2 Conceptual designs.
When examining the data, two key factors need to be considered. Firstly, responses varied across the different forms of communication. For instance, feedback received at the information stalls showed that 74% of participants were in favour. However, support was less from respondents who provided feedback via the online survey, with 46% in favour, 34% opposed, and 20% unsure. Another point to consider is the composition of the 70 participants who voted at the information stalls to give the plans the thumbs down.
Underwater Rugby have been advocating for a greater depth in the 25m pool with the moveable floor, and most of the thumb down votes (40) were cast on Thursday, 23 January 2025 which coincided with Underwater Rugby training. These votes are in line with their feedback through previous engagements and has skewed the overall community thumbs down result.
Based upon the community engagement, revised conceptual designs have been prepared with minor amendments. Changes incorporated in the revised conceptual design are as follows:
· Solar panels were not shown on the consulted conceptual design. However, they are already included within the scope of works and have now been added to the revised conceptual designs on the roof of the new plant room roof (on eastern side).
· The location of an accessibility device for the 25m pool has now been added to the revised conceptual designs. The type of device is under review as a part of the detailed design stage of the project.
· The location of outdoor showers has now been added to the revised conceptual designs
· An extra umbrella has been included along the edge of the pool area to the turf area, and two extra umbrellas have been included on the eastern side of the 50m pool.
It is recommended that Council adopt the revised conceptual designs for Stage 2 of the LPAC upgrade and endorse proceeding with the detailed design development, planning pathway approval and delivery stages for the LPAC Upgrade Stage 2.
An extensive value engineering and cost saving exercise has been undertaken to the project with oversight by the external Project Assurance Consultant and Quantity Surveyor. As detailed in the report tabled at the October 2024 Council meeting, the LPAC upgrade (Stage 1 and 2) is estimated to cost $55.5M.
There is no change to the total cost as a result of the revised conceptual plans. It should be noted that the required $55.5M to deliver the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Upgrade (Stage 1 and 2) is included in the 2025/26 budget planning process.
Stage 1 construction works commenced on 1 April 2025, following prior notification to residents and pool users. This stage includes the installation of splash pads, refurbishment of the mushroom pool, construction of a new BBQ area, and upgrades to the indoor pool's heating and mechanical systems. Fencing, site establishment, and banner mesh installation have been completed, with demolition works now underway.
BACKGROUND
The Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre (LPAC) was established in the early 1960s and has since undergone several upgrades to meet evolving community needs. Serving as a beloved community hub for over 60 years, LPAC has continually adapted to provide recreational opportunities for residents and patrons.
Council has previously undertaken community engagements in regard to the LPAC Upgrade masterplan in 2018 (from 22 January 2018 to 26 February 2018) and 2020 (from 16 March 2020 to 20 April 2020).
At the Council meeting held on 8 September 2020, Council resolved the following:
That Council endorse the LPAC Masterplan, noting that:
1. Depth of the proposed 25m pool needs to be resolved throughout the design process once more information is known about the constraints at site (if any) and other potential considerations. Council should wait until we have a report on the effectiveness of the new moving floor in the Ashfield Aquatic Centre before we determine the depth of the 25-metre pool in LAC; and
2. The final cost of the overall project be reported to Council once confirmed within the initial planning stages.
At the Council meeting held on 14 June 2022, Council resolved the following:
That Council:
1. Endorses the depth of the proposed 25 metre Outdoor Program Pool at Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre to be 2.1 metres with a movable floor and
2. Endorses the funding outline for the outdoor elements of the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre
It is proposed to deliver the LPAC Upgrade generally in two stages due to construction practicalities and ensuring as many facilities at LPAC are open as possible during construction. It is also proposed to commence construction works during the winter months to minimise impacts on community pool users, sport groups, swim learners and LPAC operations.
Stage 1
This includes refurbishment of the outdoor kid’s pool known as mushroom pool and a new kids’ splash play area that will have a BBQ area, seating, and shade structures.
The indoor program pool hall will have HVAC upgrades, alongside the construction of a new fully electrified heating and filtration plant for the indoor program pool and kid’s pool.
From 20 November 2023 to 31 January 2024, the community was given an opportunity to provide feedback on the stage 1 layout and design renders. This was undertaken through online surveys, direct emails, and on-site pop-up sessions. The community's response was largely positive.
The Stage 1 construction tender was approved at the 12 November 2024 Council Meeting, with construction works commencing on site on 1 April 2025 following the resident and pool users’ notification.
In this regard, construction notifications were undertaken through a variety of channels, including on-site A1 signage, letterbox drops to nearby residents, updates on the project webpage, and direct emails to pool users and patrons in March 2025.
Fencing, site establishment, and banner mesh installation have been completed, with demolition works now underway.
On 28 February 2025, Council was advised of its successful application for the Federal Government’s Round 1 Community Energy Upgrade Fund grant in the amount of $1,054,000 for Stage 1 works.
Stage 2
With the existing 50m and dive pools reaching the end of their lifespan having been constructed in the early 1960s, Council is undertaking a comprehensive renovation to revitalise the facility. This transformation will ensure the Aquatic Centre remains a vibrant and sustainable hub for the community for the next 50 years.
This includes the construction of new heated 8-lane 50m pool (1.1 to 1.8m deep) and a heated 25m pool (from zero to 2.1m depth with movable floor and accessible device), spectator seating and shade structures, new first aid, lifeguard, and storage rooms, new fully electrified pool heating system and filtration plants for 50 m and 25 m pools, accessibility lift and upgraded stairs to access the rear turfed area along with re-turfing, accessible pathway link and new picnic shelter.
The design provides for greater circulation around the pools, and a greater user experience with seating and shade adjacent to the pools. The design also provides an additional lane to make the new pools an 8-lane pool in line with best practice.
At the Council meeting held on 22 October 2024, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council publicly exhibit the conceptual designs for Stage 2 of the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre (LPAC) Upgrade and seek community feedback on the design.
2. That following the conclusion of the exhibition period, the conceptual designs for Stage 2 of the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre (LPAC) be brought back to Council for adoption.
3. That following the public consultation, Council staff bring back a report to Council each month on progress on this project.
Following the 22 October 2024 resolution, the community engagement process for Stage 2 commenced on 8 November 2024 and closed on 31 January 2025.
This report details the engagement outcomes for Stage 2 and seeks endorsement from Council to proceed with the subsequent stages of Stage 2.
The Expression of Interest (EOI) has recently been released to the market to assess and identify suitably qualified contractors in preparation for the upcoming selective tender process. The EOI is scheduled to close on 28 April 2025, with the evaluation expected to be completed by mid-June 2025 and a select tender process to follow.
Construction is anticipated to commence in May 2026, with completion anticipated in September 2027.
Project Assurance
Council has appointed a Project Assurance Consultant to have oversight of Stages 1 and 2 and ensure the highest standards of project integrity and risk management. The scope of services for the assurance consultant includes:
· Undertake high level review of how the project is performing and managing its risks and identify if a more detailed review is required in any area.
· Review the project scope to ensure it is clear and establishes clear and controlled baseline requirements, objectives, and success criteria.
· Review cost estimates and budgets to ensure they are reasonable and identify any missing cost items or flawed cost estimates.
· Review program to ensure it is reasonable and identify any missing activities or activities with flawed durations.
· Provide clear recommendations to improve delivery.
· Prepare a Project Assurance Plan
· Undertake periodic assessment for compliance with the adopted Project Assurance Plan and provide independent evaluation of the project's performance and outputs.
· Apply assurance at appropriate level and intervals to ensure project success.
· Prepare monthly reports and present them to the Inner West Council Major Capital Projects Committee.
An independent Quantity Surveyor (QS) has also been engaged to prepare cost estimates for the design of Stage 1 and 2 through its development.
The QS will also have an on-going role through the construction stages in assessing progress claims and variation costs, and monitoring cash flows.
A further level of project assurance has been gained through the recent appointment of a project specific external Project Manager.
A business case for the project has been developed to comply with Office of Local Government capital expenditure guidelines for projects costing greater than $10M. Following the adoption of this report, the business case will be sent to the Office of Local Government. Moving forward, the project will be reported to Council as resolved at the October 2024 Council meeting. This aligns with Office of Local government requirements.
DISCUSSION
Community Engagement
From 8 November 2024 to 31 January 2025, the community was invited to provide feedback on the proposed conceptual designs for Stage 2 of the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre (LPAC) upgrade through Council’s “Your Say” platform. The engagement platform was promoted through a flyer distribution, social media, direct email, Active Inner West newsletter and on-site A1 Corflute signage. 11 Onsite information stalls were held during the community engagement.
During the 11-week engagement period, there were 9,260 visits to the Your Say Inner West Project Page. Overall, the engagement period saw 572 submissions or comments received. This included 265 people who provided feedback via the information stalls, 135 people from Your Say page and 172 people who provided feedback through emails, Facebook, or Instagram.
The online survey and on-site engagement stalls asked the participants to provide comments on the various components and different aspects of the proposed conceptual layouts. A total of 135 individuals participated in the online survey, while 96 email responses were submitted.
There was detailed written feedback received from NSW Underwater Rugby, Balmain Water Polo Club, and Leichhardt Swimming Club.
The feedback indicated that 60% of those who responded supported the Stage 2 Conceptual designs.
When examining the data, two key factors need to be considered. Firstly, responses varied across the different forms of communication. For instance, feedback received at the information stalls showed that 74% of participants were in favour. However, support was less from respondents who provided feedback via the online survey, with 46% in favour, 34% opposed, and 20% unsure. Another point to consider is the composition of the 70 participants who voted at the information stalls to give the plans the thumbs down.
Underwater Rugby have been strongly advocating for a greater depth in the 25m pool with the moveable floor, and most of the thumb down votes (40) were cast on Thursday, 23 January 2025 which coincided with Underwater Rugby training. These votes are in line with their feedback through previous engagements and has skewed the overall community thumbs down result.
The majority of respondents were supportive of the proposed facilities and improvements. However, feedback was received requesting further changes, which included providing more shaded areas, including a spa and sauna, re-configuring the pool layout, including a dive pool, providing facilities for underwater rugby, and increasing the number of lanes.
It’s worth noting that the depths of the new 50m and 25m pools were confirmed during the Council Meeting on 14 June 2022. As per the resolution, the 50m pool will have a depth ranging from 1.1metres to 1.8 metres, while the 25m pool will have a maximum depth of 2.1metres, excluding the thickness of the moveable floor.
The most prominent comments included:
· Need for more shaded areas (61)
· Inclusion of a spa and sauna (29)
· Changes to pool Layout (20)
· Inclusion of dive pool (18)
· Changing the pool design to accommodate underway Rugby (18)
· Increasing the number of pool lanes (18)
· Potential construction impacts (15)
· Need for more parking (11)
· Better facilities for Water Polo (10)
· Improvements to change Rooms (10)
· Accessibility at 25 m pool (6)
The below table details the prominent community comments collected from the above engagement including written submissions, and officers’ comments on the item:
|
Community Comments |
Officer Response |
|
Sydney Stinger Water Polo Club
Sydney Stinger Water Polo Club is extremely supportive of the Stage 2 plans, particularly the inclusion of the movable floor (to 2.1m depth 25m pool) to support water polo games and training. Over 20% of our members reside in Inner West council, and we are excited for the opportunity to engage with Leichhardt Park Aquatic Center to see how we could offer our members water polo game and training opportunities closer to where they live.
|
Noted |
|
Increased Shade in general and around 25 m pool
The proposal lacks sufficient shade, particularly around or over the 25m pool.
The absence of adequate shade at the Ashfield Aquatic Centre redevelopment has been an ongoing concern. |
Weather protection (sun and rain) and seating are key design considerations. The proposed pool concourse contains mixed shading and seats in the conceptual design. The indoor 25-metre program pool will serve as the primary shaded area during summer. Extending shade over the new 25-metre and 50-metre pools is not included in the scope which is in keeping with other Inner West Council aquatic centers. This provides a sustainable approach given shade (even partially) over the pools would have a significant visual impact and has an estimated cost over $400,000.
Notwithstanding, in response to feedback, an extra umbrella has been included along the edge of the pool area to the turf area, and two extra umbrellas have been included on the eastern side of the 50m pool.
|
|
Accessibility features at 25 m pool
The hoists at Ashfield Aquatic Centre are not user-friendly. Could an accessible ramp be included at the 25m pool, or would it be possible to consider alternatives such as a stair and a movable floor? |
Council previously explored integrating an accessible ramp with the moveable floor in the 25m pool. Due to technical reasons, the ramp cannot extend to the full depth of the pool (2.1m) and would result in a 1.1m drop to the floor from the lowest edge of the ramp.
This environment could lead to a user finding themselves in the full depth of pool water which is beyond their swimming ability, and results in the potential for drownings. This presents an unacceptable risk to the community and as such it is proposed to include an accessibility device for the 25m pool rather than a ramp. The type of device is under review in the detailed design stage of the project.
It’s worth noting that learnt experiences from other aquatic centres has shown that ramp integrations lead to increased wear and tear on mechanical components, ongoing maintenance issues, including misalignment and jamming, and overall reduced reliability which may lead to any ramp being regularly closed for maintenance.
|
|
Solar Panels
The concept plans and artist impressions do not currently feature solar panels. Incorporating them would be a valuable initiative to enhance the use of renewable energy. Will they be included in the future design? |
Solar panels were not shown on the artist impressions and plans. However, they are already included within the scope of works and will be considered within our design development on the roof of the buildings, where suitable. |
|
Construction Disruption
What is the expected duration of construction for Stage 2 works? Additionally, how will patrons and users be accommodated or impacted during the construction period? |
We acknowledge that construction may cause some temporary inconvenience. However, the new pools will provide a modern, upgraded space that will serve the community for the next 50 years.
Construction is anticipated to commence in May 2026, with completion anticipated in September 2027.
The Indoor pools will remain open during Stage 2.
Other Aquatic Centres including Ashfield Aquatic Centre, Annette Kellerman Aquatic Centre and Fanny Durack Aquatic Centre within LGA can be used during this period.
|
|
Additional number of lanes
With population growth expected in the coming decades, an 8-lane pool may not be sufficient. Could the number of lanes be increased to 9 or 10 to better accommodate future demand? |
The project increases the number of lanes compared to existing in keeping with best practice. Additional number of lanes beyond 8-lanes are not within the project’s scope.
The depth and geometry of the pools was confirmed at the 14 June 2022 Council Meeting.
|
|
Inclusion of Spa and Sauna
Spa and sauna facilities offer valuable services to users. At Ashfield Aquatic Centre, the sauna and steam room are frequently busy and overcrowded. Would it be possible to include these amenities in the project scope? |
Spa and sauna facilities are not included in the project scope.
|
|
Underwater Rugby
Could the new 25 metre pool with a moveable floor be altered to have a maximum depth of 3.5 metres, or would this cause serious logistic or budget issues?
Could the new 8 lane, 50 metre pool have a section (e.g., 8m length) of the pool deepened to 3.5 metres, or would this cause serious logistic or budget issues?
Has IWC reviewed the feasibility of any such modifications? |
It is understood the importance of pool depth for the underwater rugby community.
However, the depth of the 25-metre pool was formally confirmed at a maximum of 2.1m by a Council resolution on 14 June 2022 (item 13). It’s worth noting that specialised sports users, including Underwater Rugby, Deep Water Aqua, and Water Polo, represent 1.84% of total annual pool users (739,000 in FY 2023/2024).
Increasing the depth of either the 25-metre or 50-metre pool is a complex and costly process beyond simple excavation, with challenges such as underground conditions, contamination risks, and structural issue. A deeper pool would also require more heated water, straining the sustainable heating system and necessitating additional heat pumps, expanded plant space, and a major power supply upgrade, further increasing costs and logistical complexity. As such, it is not considered feasible.
|
|
Fanny Durack operation in winter
It is suggested to keep Fanny Durack Swimming Centre open during the winter months while construction works for LPAC Stage 2 are underway, ensuring continued access for patrons. |
Operating Fanny Durack during winter is not feasible. However, the operating hours of other aquatic centres including Ashfield Aquatic Centre and Annette Kellerman Aquatic Centre may be extended to accommodate increased demand during the Stage 2 works. These arrangements will be confirmed as a part of the detailed design and implementation stages.
|
|
Cost Overrun
Is the $55.0M project cost merely a high-level estimate? How will the Council ensure effective cost control and prevent potential overruns on this project? |
The Inner West Council is leveraging lessons learnt from similar aquatic centre developments to ensure smooth delivery of this project while aligning with the allocated budget.
The Inner West Council has undertaken a detailed site investigation and cost-planning process. This approach integrates valuable insights gained from similar projects to ensure efficient budget management and deliver the best outcomes for our community.
Council has a strong project assurance/ governance model across the project which is detailed in the background of this report.
|
|
Outdoor Showers
Please incorporate outdoor showers into the design. |
Outdoor showers have been added to the revised concept plan attached to this report.
|
|
Dive Tower
Please retain and restore the dive tower, as it is one of Sydney's oldest and most iconic structures. |
The outdoor pools and dive tower (constructed in the early 1960s) are at the end of their lifespan, making their replacement a necessary step. Due to safety, the dive pool needs to be removed.
|
|
Pool Layout
The proposed pool relocation appears to incur unnecessary excessive costs. Why isn’t the current pool layout being considered in the design? What are the key advantages of relocating the pools? |
At first glance, relocating the pool may seem complex, but over-excavation is required regardless of layout to accommodate construction needs. Additionally, a significant volume of unsuitable material, including general and restricted solid waste, must be removed, making the cost difference between layouts minimal with no impact on project duration.
The proposed layout is based on key factors. Geotechnically, placing the 50m pool on the eastern side minimises piling depth, improving constructability and reducing costs. Operationally, positioning it near the heating and filtration plant minimises heat loss and enhances efficiency. Centrally locating the 25m pool with a movable floor improves circulation and accessibility for indoor and outdoor pool users.
|
|
Dive Pool
Removing the pool would significantly impact sports like underwater rugby and water polo, which rely on deep-water facilities. Additionally, deep-water swimming provides substantial health and wellness benefits. Why can't the dive pool be refurbished and maintained instead of being removed? |
Visible ground settlements have been observed around the 50m and dive pools which are obvious on site (the pools have been built since early 1960s). An independent structural assessment has confirmed the need for full asset replacement to ensure long-term safety and functionality (and increased design life till next 50 years).
Regarding the depth of the 25m pool, after careful consideration, the Council resolution on June 14, 2022 (item 13) determined an effective depth of 2.1m (excluding the depth or thickness of the moving floor).
|
|
Water Polo
Proposal from Balmain Water Polo Club:
· Reorientation & Extension: Propose reorienting the planned 25m pool in a North-South direction and extending its length to 33m to accommodate men’s water polo competitions.
· Alternative Request: If the extension is not feasible, consider increasing the pool to 9 lanes to enhance usability and capacity. |
The Council resolution on 14 June 2022 (Item 13) confirmed an effective depth of 2.1m for the 25-metre pool, excluding the thickness of the moving floor.
Alternative layouts, including additional lanes or reorientation, were assessed during Council’s 2020 community engagement and were found not to be feasible due to site constraints. This was reconfirmed during the development of the conceptual designs and also found to be cost prohibitive.
In addition, a larger pool would require more heated water, increasing demand on the sustainable heating system, necessitating larger or additional heat pumps, expanded plant space, and higher operational costs. A major power supply upgrade would also be necessary, adding to the project's financial and logistical complexities.
It should be noted that the current dimensions of the proposed 25 m pool, with a depth of 2.1 meters, makes it suited for a variety of water polo activities, including training, club matches, and local competitions.
|
|
Green Space Improvement
Can additional landscaping and green areas be incorporated into the design? |
Opportunities for green space improvements will be sought during design development, with the consideration of the site constraints where appropriate. |
Changes incorporated in revised conceptual design
Based upon the above feedback, revised conceptual designs have been prepared with minor amendments, and are attached to this report.
Changes incorporated in the revised conceptual design are as follows:
· Solar panels were not shown on the consulted conceptual design. However, they are already included within the scope of works and have now been added to the revised conceptual designs on the roof of the new plant room roof (on eastern side).
· The location of an accessibility device for the 25m pool has now been added to the revised conceptual designs. The type of device is under review as a part of the detailed design stage of the project.
· The location of outdoor showers has now been added to the revised conceptual designs
· An extra umbrella has been included along the edge of the pool area to the turf area, and two extra umbrellas have been included on the eastern side of the 50m pool.
It is recommended that Council adopt the revised conceptual designs for Stage 2 of the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre upgrade and endorse proceeding with the detailed design development, planning approval and delivery stages for the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Upgrade Stage 2.
Planning Pathway
Leichhardt Park’s Plan of Management establishes the objectives and performance targets for Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre upgrade which includes implementing the conceptual plans.
The planning pathway approval for the project is via Section 2.73(2) of the State Environmental Planning Policy. This requires a Review of Environment Factors to confirm compliance and ensure the works are consistent with the Plan of Management and relevant environmental considerations prior to works commencing.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
An extensive value engineering and cost saving exercise has been undertaken to the project with oversight by the external Project Assurance Consultant and Quantity Surveyor.
As detailed in the report tabled at the October 2024 Council meeting, the LPAC upgrade is estimated to cost $55.5M (Stage 1 - $9.78M and Stage 2 - $45.72M) and the Inner West Council’s Long Term Financial Plan includes an allocation of $40.5M. This results in an estimated budget shortfall of $15M.
Council was recently advised of its successful application for the Federal Government’s Round 1 Community Energy Upgrade Fund grant in the amount of $1,054,000 for Stage 1 works.
The Chief Financial Officer has confirmed that the shortfall can be sourced through funding derived from the Depreciation Reserve, Section 7.11, VPA funds from Leichhardt Plans, along with the Community Energy Upgrade Fund.
There is no change to the total cost as a result of the revised conceptual plans.
It should be noted that the required $55.5M to deliver the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Upgrade (Stage 1 and 2) is included in the 2025/26 budget planning process.
Attachment 1 has been published separately in the Attachments Document on Council’s Website https://www.innerwest.nsw.gov.au/about/the-council/council-meetings/current-council-meetings
|
1.⇨ |
Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Upgrade (Stage 2) Community Engagement Outcome Report – Published Separately on Council’s website |
|
2.⇩ |
Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Upgrade (Stage 2) Revised Conceptual Plans |
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Item No: C0425(1) Item 4
Subject: Mort Bay Park Upgrade - Pickleball and Tennis Practice Wall
Prepared By: Stuart Hull - Senior Manager Capital Works
Authorised By: Ryann Midei - Director Property and Major Projects
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council, as a part of the Mort Bay Park upgrade, endorse the following additional improvements: a) pickleball line marking to the existing multi-purpose court; b) convert part of the existing multi-purpose court to include a tennis practice wall; and c) resurface the multi-purpose court.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport 4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities 5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Council at its February 2025 meeting resolved to investigate installing pickleball line markings on existing surfaces and converting the multi-purpose court wall into a tennis practice wall at Mort Bay Park, Birchgrove.
The two pickleball line marking options were investigated by Council officers and considered for suitability.
The investigation on the wharf area identified that it is owned by Transport for NSW (Maritime). The concrete wharf is currently heavily used by pedestrians including children on scooters/bikes, cyclists and fisherman. The proposal to add an additional play element to this location would increase the potential for recreational conflict including the risk of users needing to retrieve balls being hit into the harbour. As such, this option was deemed to be not feasible.
The alternate option is to add Pickleball line marking to the existing multi-purpose court. The investigation found that the most suitable position within the court was in the middle of the court, with a north/south orientation. This will reduce stray balls escaping the court onto the nearby pathway and road. This option was considered to have minimal impact on the current use of the multi-purpose court and is considered feasible. As such it is recommended to be included as a part of the Mort Bay Park upgrade
The investigation to convert the court wall into a tennis practice wall have found it to be feasible. As such, it is recommended to construct a 5m wide x 3.2m high wall on the western side of the multi-purpose court as a part of the Mort Bay Park upgrade works.
As an additional activity is proposed to be introduced to the current multi-purpose court, it is recommended to resurface the court as part of the ongoing asset renewal program. The resurface works will be undertaken as part of the Mort Bay Park upgrade scope of works though funded from existing renewal budgets.
The multi-purpose court resurfacing, pickleball line marking and tennis practice wall works are estimated to cost $50,000 and are anticipated for completion in November 2025.
BACKGROUND
Mort Bay Park is a waterfront park located in the heart of Birchgrove. It is a unique place which is highly valued by the local community and visitors from all over Australia. It is used as a space for informal recreation and play with multiple informal turf areas which are used for informal ball sports and a place to relax.
At the Council meeting held on 22 October 2024, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council allocate up to $2 million in the draft 2025-26 Budget to the upgrade amenities and facilities at Mort Bay Park, including the following improvements:
a) A new toilet near the playground and ferry wharf;
b) A playground upgrade with a waterplay area and shade sails;
c) Fixing drainage and muddy areas;
d) Improved lighting throughout the Park to make night-time use safer;
e) Progressing water and sediment quality testing to allow a swim site;
f) Table tennis tables, picnic tables and BBQ's and seating; and
g) Outdoor gym equipment.
2. That Council commence community consultation in 2024 on the priorities of local residents for inclusion in the upgrade.
3. That Council receive a report to the February 2025 Ordinary Council meeting on the outcomes of the community consultation and identifying which of the improvements can be undertaken immediately and which will need to be subject to a procurement process.
Community consultation was then held from 22 November to 20 December 2024 regarding the improvements with positive feedback received.
Subsequently, the consultation outcomes were reported to Council at its meeting on 18 February 2025. The tabled report identified the supported improvements and a timeline for implementation.
At the Council meeting held on 18 February 2025, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council, as a part of the upgrade to amenities and facilities at Mort Bay Park, endorse the following improvements:
a) a playground upgrade with a waterplay area and shade sails;
b) fixing park drainage, muddy areas and upgrade to existing park footpaths;
c) improved lighting throughout the Park to make night-time use safer;
d) progressing water and sediment quality testing to allow a swim site;
e) picnic tables and BBQ's and seating;
f) outdoor gym equipment; and
g) new toilet near playground and ferry wharf’.
2. That Council investigate provisions for pickleball line markings on existing surfaces and converting the basketball court wall into a tennis wall with a report back to the April 2025 Council meeting outlining costs.
Council officers subsequently commenced investigating pickleball line markings on the existing surfaces and converting the existing multi-purpose court wall into a tennis wall.
It’s worth noting that in 2014, the former basketball court at Mort Bay Park was upgraded to the current multi-purpose court which included futsal, basketball and netball facilities.
DISCUSSION
Pickleball Line Markings on Existing Services
The Council resolution calls for the investigation of pickleball line markings on existing surfaces at Mort Bay Park. It’s worth noting that the community consultation also identified requests for pickleball line marking to be added to the existing multi-purpose court, and an option to line mark several pickleball courts along the concrete wharf near the playground.
The two requested pickleball line marking options were investigated by Council officers and considered for suitability.
The investigation on the wharf identified that it is owned by Transport for NSW (Maritime). The concrete wharf is currently heavily used by pedestrians including children on scooters/bikes, cyclists and fisherman. The proposal to add an additional play element to this location would increase the potential for recreational conflict including the risk of users needing to retrieve balls being hit into the harbour. As such, this option was deemed to be not feasible.
The alternate option is to add Pickleball line marking to the existing multi-purpose court. The investigation found that the most suitable position within the court was in the middle of the court, with a north/south orientation. This will reduce stray balls escaping the court onto the nearby pathway and road. This option was considered to have minimal impact on the current use of the multi-purpose court and is considered feasible. As such it is recommended to be included as a part of the Mort Bay Park upgrade. An illustration of this arrangement is shown below.
As an additional activity is proposed to be introduced to the current multi-purpose court, it is recommended to resurface the court as part of the ongoing asset renewal program. The resurface works will be undertaken as part of the Mort Bay Park upgrade scope of works though funded from existing renewal budgets.
Tennis Practice Wall
The resolution calls for the investigation to convert the multi purpose court wall into a tennis practice wall. The community consultation also identified requests for a tennis practice wall to be constructed on the multi-purpose court.
Council officers have investigated this arrangement and have found it to be feasible. In this regard, it is recommended to construct a 5m wide x 3.2m high wall on the western side of the multi-purpose court as a part of the Mort Bay Park upgrade works. An illustration of this arrangement is shown below.
Project Delivery Schedule
The delivery schedule for the Mort Bay Park Upgrade is shown below (extracted from the February Council report and updated with the recommended items)
It is proposed to deliver the multi-purpose court resurfacing, pickleball line marking and tennis practice wall concurrently with the outdoor gym equipment in November 2025.
|
Item |
Completed By |
|
A playground upgrade with a waterplay area and shade sails |
June 2025 |
|
Extra Seating |
June 2025 |
|
Improving lighting throughout the park to make night-time use safer |
June 2025 |
|
Picnic tables |
August 2025 |
|
BBQs |
August 2025 |
|
Outdoor gym equipment |
November 2025 |
|
Pickleball line marking, multi-purpose court resurfacing and tennis practice wall at multi-purpose court |
November 2025 |
|
A new toilet near the playground and ferry wharf |
June 2026 |
|
Fixing park drainage, muddy areas and upgrade to existing park footpaths |
June 2026 |
The above timeframes in particular for the new toilet building, and drainage and footpath works, take into account service investigations, design, any approvals, procurement and construction.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
At its October 2024 meeting, Council resolved to allocate up to $2 million in the draft 2025-26 Budget to the upgrade amenities and facilities at Mort Bay Park.
There is currently $340,000 allocated in the 2024/25 capital works program for the Mort Bay Park Playground upgrade, with an additional allocation of $207,000 being made as part of the 2024/25 Q3 budget adjustment to fully fund the playground upgrade and lighting works in 2024/25. This additional allocation will be funded from depreciation reserves.
It is planned to consider the remaining $1.45m for the Mort Bay Park upgrade as a part of the 2025/26 budget planning process.
The pickleball line marking and tennis practice wall is estimated to cost $20,000 and will be funded from the 2025/26 Mort Bay Park upgrade budget $1.45m.
The multi-purpose court resurfacing is estimated to cost $30,000 and will be funded from the 2025/26 Assets Renewal budget.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Proposed Streetscape Improvements at The Boulevarde, Lilyfield
Prepared By: Michael Craven - Projects Delivery Manager
Authorised By: Ryann Midei - Director Infrastructure
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council endorse the revised design proposal for the streetscape improvements at The Boulevarde, Lilyfield as shown in Attachment 1 - Concept Plan No 10278- C The Boulevarde, Lilyfield.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Council called for further consultation on proposed streetscape improvements at The Boulevard, Lilyfield.
This resulted in a new round of consultation and a public meeting. The key themes of the meeting discussions were the need for improved pedestrian safety, traffic speed management and asset repairs to the road and footpaths as a part of the improvements.
Taking into consideration the comments made in the 2 rounds of community consultation and the on-site meeting, a revised plan has been prepared as attached. The revised plan seeks to create a lower speed environment with improved pedestrian safety in The Boulevard by creating entrance treatments into The Boulevard: from Balmain Road and extending beyond the lane, and from Joseph Street. In this regard, the features of the revised plan are:
· The kerb extensions at the Balmain Road intersection remain unchanged as they will reduce the speed of vehicles entering the street, improve pedestrian safety and were generally supported by the residents.
· It is proposed to install 2 landscaped median islands (without trees) on either side of the laneway. This will aid a lower speed environment. Note a typical pedestrian refuge is not feasible at this location as it would block vehicles turning into the lanes and result in a loss of parking.
· To improve pedestrian safety at the Joseph Street intersection, it is proposed to replace the asphalt footpath at the western corner with concrete to better delineate the boundary between the road and the footpath, to reinstate the marker bollards and provide line marking around the corners to further keep vehicles away from the footpath. To further improve safety and reduce vehicle speeds around the corner, a landscaped median island is proposed at the southern end of the street.
· Resurfacing the asphalt road surface, adjustment of levels at the lanes and driveways and footpath repairs were supported by the residents and remain as originally proposed.
· An investigation of additional verge plantings has been carried out and 4 additional trees are proposed to be planted in the grass verge.
The timeline for project delivery is proposed:
· Presentation to Local Traffic Committee – May 2025
· Detailed design completed – July 2025
· Procurement of construction contractors – September 2025
· Completion of Construction – December 2025
The cost of the proposed work is estimated to be $550,000.
It is recommended that Council endorse the revised plan such that the improvement works can proceed.
BACKGROUND
As a result of a condition assessment of the road assets, funds were allocated for the renewal of the Boulevarde, Lilyfield in the 2024/25 Delivery Program.
A petition was also received calling for the planting of trees in new median islands and speed calming measures to be undertaken in addition to the asset renewals.
Concept designs were developed and in August 2024, Council officers carried out community consultation with residents to consider the proposed design. Features of the concept design included:
· Footpath widening at the intersection of Balmain Road.
· New trees and native landscaping in central median islands.
· Re-setting of existing sandstone kerb stones to new levels and replacement of sandstone gutters with concrete.
· Modification of driveways and laneway entrances to reduce vehicle scraping.
· Resurfacing the asphalt road surface.
The response from the residents was generally supportive of the proposals, however 9 out of 20 submissions objected to the median islands and associated tree plantings. A summary of the submissions received are as follows:
· 8 residents fully supported the proposal.
· 3 supported the proposal but wanted reconsideration of the tree species.
· 1 objection on the basis that they don’t like the tree selection.
· 3 objections to reduction in road widths, possible loss of parking, difficult for heavy vehicles to park and concerns regarding value for money.
· 1 objection on the basis that the proposed works are not necessary and not represent value for money.
· 4 objections on the basis that trees drop litter that may make road slippery and might restrict sight lines.
The concept plans were submitted and endorsed by the Local Traffic Committee meeting on 16 September 2024, with a Recommendation that Council endorse the proposal.
At the Council meeting held on 22 October 2024, Council resolved the following in part:
b) LTC0924(1) Item 1 - The Boulevarde, Lilyfield – Proposed Streetscape Improvements and Civil Works be deferred pending further community consultation.
DISCUSSION
In accordance with the 22 October 2024 Resolution of Council, further consultation was carried out which included a public meeting held with the Mayor, Council officers and residents on 6 February 2025.
As part of the consultation revised plans were distributed which included:
· Footpath widening at the intersection of Balmain Road.
· Modification of driveways and laneway entrances to reduce vehicle scraping.
· Resurfacing the asphalt road surface and footpath repairs.
At the end of the consultation period, 6 submissions were received from residents and the following issues were raised:
· 1 resident supported the revised proposal with the removal of the trees and median islands.
· 1 submission requested angled parking.
· 1 submission requested angled parking, with in road trees included in landscaped islands.
· 3 submissions supported the original proposal for in road tree planting.
At the on-site meeting there were a number of issues raised including:
· Concerns that the trees were not going to be planted and would result in a lost opportunity: to reduce the heat island effect, increase the urban tree canopy and restore the original heritage features of The Boulevarde.
· Consideration should be given to angled parking (2 residents).
· Consideration of reducing vehicle speeds and introducing traffic calming (some residents did not agree that this was an issue).
· Issues of the flush footpath at the Joseph Street intersection and potential danger to pedestrians with cars cutting the corner.
· Consideration of the large number of children that cross the street near the lane.
· Repairs needed to road surface and some locations of footpaths.
· Extra trees wanted on the verge.
· Better maintenance of existing street trees.
The key themes of the meeting discussions were the need for improved pedestrian safety, traffic speed management and asset repairs to the road and footpaths.
To investigate traffic vehicle speeds, a traffic vehicle count measuring the number of vehicles using the street and their speed was carried out over 1 week period. This investigation indicated that there was not a serious speeding issue in the street.
However, some traffic calming measures were considered appropriate to address any isolated instances of speeding that may occur on infrequent occasions.
Taking into consideration the comments made in the 2 rounds of community consultation and the on-site meeting, a revised plan has been prepared as attached. The revised plan seeks to create a lower speed environment with improved pedestrian safety in The Boulevard by creating entrance treatments into The Boulevard: from Balmain Road and extending beyond the lane, and from Joseph Street. In this regard, the features of the revised plan are:
· The kerb extensions at the Balmain Road intersection remain unchanged as they will reduce the speed of vehicles entering the street, improve pedestrian safety and were generally supported by the residents.
· It is proposed to install 2 landscaped median islands (without trees) on either side of the laneway. This will aid a lower speed environment. Note a typical pedestrian refuge is not feasible at this location as it would block vehicles turning into the lanes and result in a loss of parking.
· To improve pedestrian safety at the Joseph Street intersection, it is proposed to replace the asphalt footpath at the western corner with concrete to better delineate the boundary between the road and the footpath, to reinstate the marker bollards and provide line marking around the corners to further keep vehicles away from the footpath. To further improve safety and reduce vehicle speeds around the corner, a landscaped median island is proposed at the southern end of the street.
· Resurfacing the asphalt road surface, adjustment of levels at the lanes and driveways and footpath repairs were supported by the residents and remain as originally proposed.
· An investigation of additional verge plantings has been carried out and 4 additional trees are proposed to be planted in the grass verge.
It’s worth noting to construct kerb extensions at the Joseph Street intersection has significant drainage implications which are cost prohibitive, with the proposed works representing the greatest value for money.
Project Delivery
As the concept plans have not significantly changed from the version originally endorsed by the Local Traffic committee, it is considered that another round of consultation is not required. However it will be necessary to present the revised plan to the Local Traffic committee for their final endorsement.
As such, the following timeline for project delivery is proposed:
· Presentation to Local Traffic Committee – May 2025
· Detailed design completed – July 2025
· Procurement of construction contractors – September 2025
· Completion of Construction – December 2025
It is recommended that Council endorse the revised plan such that the improvement works can proceed.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The cost of the proposed work is estimated to be $550,000.
There is currently $330,000 in the 2024/25 Local Roads Program, which is proposed to be re-phased to 2025/26 as part of the Q3 Quarterly Budget Review to align budget phasing to project delivery.
It is proposed to fund the balance of $220,000 from the 2025/26 Pedestrian Access and Mobility Program as the additional works are being carried out to improve pedestrian safety.
|
1.⇩ |
Concept Plan No 10278- C The Boulevarde, Lilyfield |
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Local Traffic Committee Meeting - 17 March 2025
Prepared By: Jason Scoufis - Acting Traffic and Transport Planning Manager
Authorised By: Manod Wickramasinghe - Acting Director Engineering
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and adopt the recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee meeting held on 17 March 2025. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Committee was held at the Ashfield Service Centre and has made recommendations for Council consideration and adoption.
DISCUSSION
The March 2025 meeting of the Local Traffic Committee was held at the Ashfield Service Centre. The minutes of the meeting are shown in Attachment 1.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report. Projects proposed for implementation are funded within existing budget allocations.
ITEMS BY WARD –
|
Ward |
Item |
|
Baludarri (Balmain)
|
Lilyfield Road, Rozelle - Nike After Dark Tour - Traffic Management Plan at Rozelle Parklands |
|
Parsons Street, Rozelle - Proposed Raised One Lane Slow Point |
|
|
Phillip and Bay Street, Birchgrove - Proposed 'No Parking 7am-7pm Motor Vehicles under 4.5T GVM Excepted' Restriction |
|
|
Gulgadya (Leichhardt)
|
Elswick Street North and William Street, Leichhardt - Proposed Angle Parking and Raised Pedestrian Crossing |
|
Midjuburi (Marrickville)
|
Frazer Street, Marrickville - Proposed 'No Stopping' restrictions |
|
Addison Road, Marrickville – Proposed short term parking restrictions in existing section of redundant ‘No Parking’ restrictions |
|
|
Djarrawunang (Ashfield)
|
Terrace Road, Dulwich Hill – one-month Temporary Full Road Closure during day shifts of Rail Overbridge north of Ewart Street roundabout - Sydney Metro works |
|
Smith Street, Summer Hill – Greenway Project – Proposed splitter island upgrade works at the roundabout with Carlton Crescent, Longport Street and Grosvenor Crescent |
|
|
Hurlstone Avenue, Summer Hill - Proposed kerb blister islands/narrowing of Hurlstone Avenue at Prospect Road and 'No Left Turn 7.30-9.30am, 3:00-5:00pm Mon-Fri, Bicycles Excepted' from Prospect Road into Hurlstone Avenue |
|
|
Damun (Stanmore) |
Margaret, Sarah and Simmons Streets, Enmore - Proposed 'No Stopping' restrictions and 'Shared Path' proposal |
|
All Wards |
Proposed EV Kerbside Charging Locations |
|
1.⇩ |
Local Traffic Committee minutes - 17 March 2025 |
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Minutes of the Flood Management Advisory Committee of 26 February 2025 and Appointment of Community Representatives
Prepared By: David Paton - Engineering Services Manager
Authorised By: Manod Wickramasinghe - Acting Director Engineering
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council receive the minutes and adopt the recommendations of the Flood Management Advisory Committee meeting held on 26 February 2025.
2. That Council approve appointment of the Community Representatives to the Flood Management Advisory Committee.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
1: An ecologically sustainable Inner West |
|
2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport |
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The February 2025 meeting of the Flood Management Advisory Committee was held via Microsoft Teams from 3pm on 26 February 2025.
The meeting included eight observers who are recommended to be appointed by Council as Community Representatives following a public Expression of Interest process in January and February 2025.The candidates are:
- David Chick
- Tim Harnett
- Bowen Hicks
- Pilar Lorenzo
- Emily McGrath
- Matthew Murphy
- Simon Myall
- Jaan Ranniko
These candidates represent the major catchments within Inner West Council, and will collectively contribute historic experience of flooding, connection to community groups including the NSW State Emergency Service (SES), experience in flood modelling and catchment management, and experience in project accounting, policy and governance.
BACKGROUND
Inner West Council has a responsibility and obligation under the NSW Flood Prone Land Policy and the NSW Flood Risk Management Manual to carry out studies to understand flood risk, examine options to manage flood risk, keep the community informed about flooding, and support emergency management planning.
Under the Policy and Manual, the management of flood prone land is the responsibility of local councils, including the establishment of flood risk management (FRM) governance through the establishment and management of committees.
In the Inner West Council, this function is provided within the Flood Management Advisory Committee (FMAC). The Committee provides an avenue to enable contribution by agencies, key stakeholders and the community to studies and the development of FRM plans under the FRM process.
In April 2024 Council adopted a revised Terms of Reference for the Flood Management Advisory Committee, under which Community Representative membership may only extend for up to two terms of Council.
DISCUSSION
In accordance with the Terms of Reference of the Flood Management Advisory Committee, a review of the Community Representative membership is required following the Council elections of September 2024.
Up to eight Community Representatives may be members of the committee, selected from members of the community who reside or operate on flood prone land, have expertise in local flood management, or represent local sporting groups, social groups, environmental groups or chambers of commerce impacted by flooding.
A public Expression of Interest was published on Council’s website in January and February 2025, supported by online advertising through Council’s Social Media pages.
Twelve submissions were received, with all meeting the selection criteria outlined in the Terms of Reference. The submissions were reviewed and prioritised by Council officers on behalf of the Committee Facilitator based on:
- Catchment representation
- Community representation & participation
- Experience of local flooding
- Expertise in flood management
- Further skills that would support the work of the Committee
The following list of candidates will collectively contribute historic experience of flooding, connection to community groups including the NSW State Emergency Service (SES), experience in flood modelling and catchment management, and experience in project accounting, policy and governance.
- David Chick
- Tim Harnett
- Bowen Hicks
- Pilar Lorenzo
- Emily McGrath
- Matthew Murphy
- Simon Myall
- Jaan Ranniko
The remaining Expressions of Interest are recommended to be included in a list of reserve nominations in the event of a Casual Vacancy in accordance with the Terms of Reference.
- Ben Jones
- Matthew Orsman
- David Robotham
- Ben Wilson
The first meeting of the Flood Management Advisory Committee this year was held via Microsoft Teams from 3.00pm on 26 February 2025.
The minutes of the meeting are provided in Attachment 1.
The eight nominated Community Representatives were invited to this meeting as observers.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
|
1.⇩ |
Flood Management Advisory Committee Minutes - 26 February 2025 |
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Expanding Jazz in the Park
Prepared By: Michael Daly - Creative Communities Manager
Authorised By: Ruth Callaghan - Director Community
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council endorse the proposal to expand the Jazz in the Park event into a Balmain Festival street contingent on being awarded grant funding from the Open Streets Program.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
3: Creative communities and a strong economy |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report addresses the proposal to expand the Jazz in the Park event into a Balmain Festival including a street closure.
Consultation was undertaken to determine community feedback on this proposal with the majority of respondents in support. From 12 February to 12 March 2025, the community was invited to provide feedback on expanding Jazz in the Park and relocating the festival onto Darling St. through Council’s “YourSay” platform. The community was invited to provide feedback on the scope and content of the new Balmain Festival as identified in the resolution. The vast majority of feedback was supportive.
The proposed new event would require an additional annual financial contribution from Council of $120,000 to fund traffic management, increased infrastructure and program and general operating costs. Currently Council has budgeted an amount of $60,000 for Jazz in the Park. If the event is expanded into street festival, an additional $120,000 per annum will be required. This is not currently budgeted.
Council has made an application for the Transport for NSW Open Streets program for the first three years of delivery of this event for an amount of $116,000 per annum. If the grant application is successful then this amount would cover the increased costs of the event. Delivery of the proposed expanded event would be contingent on the success of this grant application.
It is proposed that the new Balmain Festival event will be delivered on Sunday 30 November, with the rationale for this date explained in the report.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 26 November 2024, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council consult with the community and relevant organisations such as Balmain Rozelle Chamber of Commerce about expanding Jazz In The Park and relocating the Festival to Darling Street in late 2025 so that it celebrates the unique character of Balmain and involves more locals and businesses.
2. That staff provide initial costings in relation to expanding and moving the festival, including the possibility of reallocating funds from under patronised local events in the Baludarri (Balmain) ward and exploring State Government funding opportunities including programs in the NSW Vibrant Streets Package.
3. That Council report to the March 2025 Ordinary Council meeting on the outcomes of the community consultation and potential budget cost and funding opportunities so they can be considered in preparation of the 2025/2026 budget.
DISCUSSION
Jazz in the Park has run annually in Gladstone Park, Balmain for more than 10 years. The event has celebrated the best of Inner West Jazz talent and has featured numerous multi-award winning performers including The Vampires, Matt McMahon, Ellen Kirkwood, Dan Barnett and Emma Pask.
The Council resolution requests information on potentially expanding Jazz in the Park event, into a new street festival for Balmain.
Community Engagement
In response to the Council resolution, feedback was sought from the Balmain community on the resolution’s proposal through a YourSay campaign running from 12 February to 12 March 2025. The community was invited to provide feedback on the scope and content of the festival as identified in the resolution. This included:
a) The proposal to transform Jazz in the Park into a street festival on Darling Street
b) The length of the street closure - on Darling St from Montague St to Booth St
c) The proposed date and time of the event - Sunday in late 2025, from 12pm-6pm
d) Suggestions for proposed content
e) Feedback from local businesses on their desire to participate in this event
The engagement opportunity was widely advertised through a local residential letter drop for the Baludarri ward, poster distribution throughout Rozelle, Balmain and Birchgrove, social media advertising, posters on Darling St and Gladstone Park and the Balmain Rozelle Chamber of Commerce e-newsletter.
Summary of Community Engagement Feedback
Overall, there was support for the proposed form, date and location for the new Balmain Festival. The survey and emails received showed support for the proposal with 93.08% supporting the project.
During the engagement period 2,400 people visited the YourSay project page. A total of 159 participants completed the online survey, 21 email responses were received and 1 phone call was received. The Balmain Rozelle Chamber of Commerce sent a separate submission as part of this engagement which has been included as an appendix to the engagement outcomes report.
|
Contribution Summary |
You said |
|
Do you support the proposal outlined below 159 responses
|
Yes – 93.08% No – 2.52% Don’t know/Unsure – 4.4% |
|
Did we get the location right 159 responses |
Yes – 74.84% No – 10.06% Don’t know/Unsure – 15.09% |
|
Did we get the time right? 159 responses |
Yes – 61.01%% No – 22.64% Don’t know/Unsure – 16.35% |
|
Do you support the activities outlined below 159 responses
|
Yes – 93.71% No – 2.52% Don’t know/Unsure – 3.77% |
|
Are you a local business? 159 responses
|
Yes – 13.21% No - 86.79% |
|
[if you are a local business] Would you be interested in participating in the festival 21 responses
|
Yes – 76.19% No – 4.76% Don’t know/Unsure – 19.05% |
|
What new elements could be included that would celebrate the character of Balmain? 108 responses
|
See detailed comment section [Attachment 1] |
Other points to note include:
· There was a large amount of support from the community for involving local businesses in the event, with 76.19% of local businesses who responded to the survey indicating that they would be interested in participating.
· Whilst the majority of respondents supported the time of the festival, a number of free text comments indicated that they did not want a Balmain Festival in December as the month was too busy and/or too hot and either suggested an earlier Spring event or an Autumn event.
· Overall respondents also wanted a later finish time of between 7-8pm for the event. By contrast, a small number of respondents indicated they wanted an earlier event such as 9am-3pm.
· There was a variety of suggested amendments to the overall street location, including suggestions to extend the event footprint up to the Town Hall or down to Curtis Rd. There were also a variety of suggestions that the festival should take place in another park location such as Callan Park, Birchgrove Oval or Mort Bay Park. A small number of respondents indicated they want to retain the event in Gladstone Park as part of this proposal, or in place of the Balmain Festival.
· A small number of respondents including those that support the overall proposal raised concerns about traffic and public transport impacts, increased car congestion and parking as a result of a festival on Darling Street.
The proposal was also presented at the Local Matters Forum for the Baludarri ward on 1 April.
Proposed festival format
Following community consultation, it is proposed that a new event be delivered on a closed Darling St from Montague St to Booth St to run from 12pm-5pm on Sunday 30 November 2025.
As Darling St is a State Road, this new festival would require approval through the local traffic committee. The length of road proposed is 450m, this compares to 350m from Marrickville Music Festival. This section of road was chosen to connect with the legacy event site in Gladstone Park and allows traffic access for emergency services and public transport routes.
The festival would incorporate a combination of local creative and Balmain/Rozelle stallholders, extended trading and footpath activations from local businesses, local bands, schools and community performers and creative workshop programming. Priority would be given to applicants from the Baludarri ward, and then to the Inner West more broadly should there be a shortfall.
Programming will be complementary to the existing businesses in the Balmain area. Council proposes to work closely with both the Balmain Rozelle Chamber of Commerce and the Balmain Markets in the delivery of this event.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The proposed expansion of the Jazz Festival to Darling Street is contingent on significant additional funding that is not available. Currently, there is $60,000 allocated as Council’s contribution to the Jazz in the Park budget. To deliver the proposed Balmain Festival model, an additional allocation of $120,000 would be required to cover traffic management required for a significant road closure, an expanded entertainment program and increased infrastructure required to fill the expanded event site as well as general operating costs for a significant event site footprint.
An application has been submitted for funding for this proposal through Transport for NSW Open Streets program for the first three years of delivery of this event. An amount of $350,000 has been requested as part of this application, or in the order of $116,000 each year. This grant round is a competitive application process. Applications closed on 14 March, and successful applicants will be notified in May.
Should Council be successful for Open Streets funding, as part of the funding conditions, this event must be delivered before February 2026, and as such it is proposed to be delivered in late 2025 – Sunday 30 November. Based on the success and learnings of the first year of delivery, festival times may be adjusted slightly in subsequent years based on community and business feedback.
Attachment 1 has been published separately in the Attachments Document on Council’s Website https://www.innerwest.nsw.gov.au/about/the-council/council-meetings/current-council-meetings
|
1.⇨ |
Proposed Balmain Festival - Engagement Outcomes Report |
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Burwood Council Proposed Boundary Changes Around Presbyterian Ladies College Croydon
Prepared By: Matthew Pearce - General Counsel
Authorised By: Peter Gainsford - General Manager
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council write to Burwood Council rejecting their proposal to amend the Local Government boundary at Croydon. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Burwood Council is proposing an adjustment to the Local Government Area (LGA) boundary between Croydon (currently Inner West Council) and Burwood Council.
The primary objective of Burwood Council's proposal outlined in their Mayoral Minute is to consolidate the majority of Presbyterian Ladies College’s (PLC) facilities within the Burwood LGA. Burwood Council states this aims to address administrative and logistical complexities for the school arising from the current division of its land between the two council areas, potentially streamlining traffic management, planning, development applications, and advocacy for PLC.
There are 52 properties currently within the Inner West LGA affected by the Burwood Council proposed boundary change (10 of which are owned by The Presbyterian Church NSW Property Trust).
It is recommended that Council write to Burwood Council advising that it doesn’t support the boundary change.
DISCUSSION
Burwood Council is proposing an adjustment to the LGA boundary between Croydon (currently Inner West Council) and Burwood Council. Presbyterian Ladies College, Sydney (PLC Sydney) operates across multiple parcels of land at 1 Meta Street, Croydon within both the Inner West LGA and Burwood LGA.
The primary objective of Burwood Council's proposal is to consolidate the majority of PLC's facilities within the Burwood LGA. Burwood Council states this aims to address administrative and logistical complexities for the school arising from the current division of its land between the two council areas, potentially streamlining traffic management, planning, development applications, and advocacy for PLC.
Burwood Council's initial consideration involved a proposed adjustment shown in Attachment 1. Subsequently, a revised proposal, expanding the number of Inner West properties impacted by their proposal is detailed an amended boundary in Attachment 2.
The item was considered by Burwood Council on 25 March 2025 (Item MM3/25) to progress the LGA boundary adjustment process based on the revised proposal in Attachment 2. which increases the proposed Boundary changes to impact more Inner West properties.
The General Manager of Burwood Council has written to Inner West Council advising of a Mayoral Minute where Burwood Council resolved as follows:
a) Council confirms it has no in-principle objections to the proposed adjustment to the Local Government Area boundary between Burwood and Inner West Local Government Areas as shown in Attachment B of this report.
b) The General Manager formally commence the Local Government Area boundary adjustment process in accordance with the NSW Local Government Act 1993 to amend the boundary between Burwood and Inner West Council Local Government Areas, as shown in Attachment B of this report.
c) The General Manager provide regular updates on the matter as Council progresses through the NSW Local Government Act 1993 requirements.
d) The Mayor of Burwood write to the Mayor of Inner West, notifying them of Burwood Council’s decision.
Although this is not mentioned in the Burwood Council Mayoral Minute it is important to note that Inner West Council previously considered a report in September 2020 for the part sale of Elizabeth Street Croydon adjacent to PLC. This was subject to the approval of a State Significant Development Application removing the on-street parking for 5-6 vehicles) and incorporate the land into the school site, providing for up to 29 basement car parking spaces which would be an increase of 12 spaces from the current 17 open hardstand car parking spaces already on the adjacent land.
Upon consideration of this report Inner West Council resolved as follows:
That Council does not support the partial road closure of Elizabeth St Croydon, and does not support the Subsequent sale to PLC.
PLC have since lodged a Pre Development Application for demolition of the existing residential developments at 116-118 Edwin Street and construction of three storey educational building and a new driveway access from Edwin Street which council responded to in August 2024.
There are 52 properties currently within the Inner West LGA affected by the Burwood Council proposed boundary change (10 of which are owned by The Presbyterian Church NSW Property Trust). The increased plan also includes all of Elizabeth Street from Edwin Street and all of College Street which subject to a resolution of Council and necessary approvals could be sold to PLC for a considerable sum.
Alternatively, it would be just as easy to expand the Inner West LGA to cover all of PLC school area and it wouldn’t impact any property within the Burwood LGA as PLC campus covers the entire street frontage and would impact on no other property.
It is recommended that Council write to Burwood Council advising that it doesn’t support the boundary change.
Process for Boundary adjustments
The process for altering LGA boundaries, as outlined in Section 204 of the Local Government Act 1993, begins with a proposal for change. In this instance, Burwood Council's initiative to adjust the boundary between our councils constitutes this initial proposal, with two specific boundary options having been presented.
For this proposal to progress, Burwood Council is effectively required to develop a business case to submit to the Minister for Local Government (under Section 215).
Upon receiving the proposal, the Minister is obligated to give public notice of it (Section 216).
Following this public notification, Section 217 allows for representations to be made by interested parties. It is at this stage that Inner West Council would likely become formally involved, with a Council resolution potentially required to support any representation (either for or against the proposal).
If the Minister decides to proceed after considering these representations, the proposal must be referred to the Boundaries Commission for examination and a report (Section 218).
Ultimately, based on the Minister's recommendation, Section 218B of the Act allows the Governor to alter the boundaries of the affected LGAs (Burwood and Inner West Councils) by way of a proclamation.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
|
1.⇩ |
Proposed boundary changes 2024 |
|
2.⇩ |
Proposed boundary changes 2025 |
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Rozelle Parklands
Prepared By: Matthew Pearce - General Counsel
Authorised By: Peter Gainsford - General Manager
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council resolve that the General Manager negotiate the final terms of a Care Control and Management Agreement and Funding Deed with Transport for New South Wales.
2. That Council resolve the General Manager execute a Care Control Management Agreement and Funding Deed for Rozelle Parklands.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
|
The Council and Transport for New South Wales (TfNSW) have been negotiating the terms of a Care, Control and Management Agreement and Funding Agreement for Rozelle Parklands.
The negotiations have been ongoing since May 2024 and the parties are now finalising the terms of the care, control, management and funding of Rozelle Parklands.
The Care, Control and Management Agreement and Funding Deed are legal agreements between Council and TfNSW which allows Council to manage the operations of the Rozelle Parklands particularly for community sporting activities and ensures that there is adequate the funding to provide capital works for the Parklands and nearby areas.
The Care, Control and Management Agreement and Funding Agreement will be executed on agreed terms by the General Manager.
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION
On 5 March 2024, Council was provided with an update on the Rozelle Interchange and Rozelle Parklands concerning matters of traffic congestion, the asbestos contamination and the EPA cleanup of areas of contamination in and around the Parklands.
On 18 February 2025, Council was further provided with an update concerning the Rozelle Parklands Plan of Management and the state of negotiations with TfNSW concerning the future use of the Parklands for sporting clubs and continuing maintenance by TfNSW of the lands.
Council completed an Expression of Interest process with local sporting clubs in relation to seasonal sporting allocations for use of the sporting grounds at Rozelle Parks in 2024. This process has been on hold pending the issuing of an agreement for access to the sporting grounds from TfNSW.
Transport for NSW (TfNSW) are currently undertaking additional landscaping and facility upgrades to the Rozelle Parklands. The construction of multi-purpose courts, an amenities building, playground toilets, field lighting and grass improvement works within Rozelle Parklands. TfNSW have advised that these works have staged completions as follows:
· multi-purpose courts are expected to be completed by May 2025;
· grass improvements are expected to be completed by May 2025.
· amenity building is expected to be completed by June 2025;
· playground toilets are expected to be completed by June 2025.
· Flood lighting is expected to be completed by June 2025.
Since May 2024, Council has been in negotiations with TfNSW concerning how, as the future manager, the Parklands should be managed to allow access for community sport. The management of the Parklands now being formalised through a Care, Control and Management Agreement. This Agreement ensures that the Rozelle Parklands can be used for community sports and at the same time allows various external operators (TfNSW, Transurban, Ausgrid, Western Sydney Harbour Tunnel, Westconnex) of the Parklands access for ongoing maintenance of road and utility infrastructure.
The Council will be the manager of the Rozelle Parklands area as detailed in the Site Boundary Map in Attachment 1.
The negotiations with TfNSW have also included a formal Funding Deed which formalises the offer made by the State Government to provide Council with $20M for on-going capital works in and around the Parklands and nearby areas while Council will maintain the Rozelle Parklands.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The State Government is providing $20M funding commitment for the ongoing capital works improvements at the Parklands and at other parks in proximity to the Parklands. There is funding in the Long Term Financial Plan for the ongoing maintenance of Rozelle Parklands
ATTACHMENTS
|
1.⇩ |
Site Boundary Map |
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Illegally Blocked Driveways
Prepared By: Graeme Palmer - Senior Manager, Regulatory Services
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council endorse the following Policy statement for inclusion in the Parking Enforcement Operating Management Standard (OMS):
‘Where a Council officer verifies that a resident is prevented access to their driveway, a tow truck is engaged to move the vehicle.’
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report recommends the inclusion of the following Policy statement into Councils Parking Enforcement Operating Management Standard:
Where a Council officer verifies that a resident is prevented access to their driveway, a tow truck is engaged to move the vehicle.
The above inclusion in the Parking and Enforcement Operating Management Standard is considered a balanced approach to the safety and amenity of residents when their driveway is blocked by an unauthorised vehicle.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 18 February 2025, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council develop a policy to better support residents impacted by illegally blocked driveways, including but not limited to investigating provision of towing services in the following circumstances:
a) where a resident is blocked from exiting their driveway, a tow truck is engaged immediately; and
b) where a resident is blocked from entering their driveway, a tow truck is engaged after 24 hours.
2. That Council receive a report back on a draft policy and costs by the April 2025 Council Meeting.
DISCUSSION
In 2024, Council received around 3200 complaints alleging illegal parking which impacted driveways. During the same period approximately 830 fines were written for stopping on/across driveways.
Attending blocked driveways and complaints about unsafe parking within three hours is a key performance indicator for the Council’s Parking Team. The table below shows significant improvement over the last three years such that 91% of complaints are now attended to within 3 hours.
|
Year |
Number of blocked driveway attended |
% attended to within 3 hour (KPI) |
|
2022 |
3251 |
60 |
|
2023 |
3790 |
79 |
|
2024 |
4393 |
86 |
|
2025 (1 Jan - 31 March) |
419 |
91 |
Currently parking officers utilise the NSW Road Rule (198) which prohibits any vehicle from obstructing a driveway. Obstruction is defined as “any part of the vehicle is on or across the driveway”. Noting that it can be challenging for residents to find parking it is not uncommon for them to park across their own driveway. Officers only attend upon receipt of a complaint and would not therefor usually proactively fine a vehicle in such instances. A fine under the NSW Road Rule is $320.
Following endorsement of this policy statement the process to clear a blocked driveway will be via action utilising the Public Spaces (Unattended Property) Act 2021 (PSUP) which permits Council to move or take possession of an item obstructing access to or within a public place. Under PSUP Council may either move the vehicle within the same general area or take the vehicle into possession and move the vehicle to a place of storage (impound the vehicle). It is proposed to move vehicles within the general area and request the assistance of police to contact the registered owner and advise them of the vehicle’s new location. To remove a vehicle requires reliance upon the PSUP legislation, and a subsequent fine would then be imposed under this legislation – which is $660.
This fine is sufficient to recoup the cost of towing a vehicle which is variable depending on the circumstances but is likely to average around $300.
Risks
Tow contractors need reasonable space to be able to access vehicles to facilitate removal. There may be some instances where a vehicle cannot be towed due to restricted access. There is also the risk of damage to a vehicle when loading and unloading vehicles, using the wrong towing methods, tie-down points or improper preparation.
Towing fees are estimated to be $300 depending on circumstances. The fine imposed for an unauthorised vehicle blocking a driveway under PSUP is $660. While the PSUP Act does not provide an option for fees or fee recovery for vehicles that are moved locally, the fine under PSUP is sufficient to offset the cost.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Leichhardt Oval Renovation Update
Prepared By: Scott Mullen - Strategic Investments and Property Manager
Authorised By: Ryann Midei - Director Property and Major Projects
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council endorse the Leichhardt Oval Renovation Final Design Concepts April 2025 (Attachment 1) and proceed with preparing detailed plans in order to seek planning approval.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport 4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
|
This report provides final Design Concept for the renovation of Leichhardt to Council.
BACKGROUND
In October 2023 Inner West Council adopted the Leichhardt Oval Masterplan following extensive public engagement. The Masterplan was developed in partnership with Cox Architecture.
In June 2024, the Commonwealth, State and Local Governments formed a funding partnership to secure the future of Leichhardt Oval. The Commonwealth committing $20 million to the project, with the NSW Government and the Inner West Council investing $10 million each towards the upgrade.
Ernst and Young (EY) were appointed as project managers in August 2024 and Cox Architecture brought on board to finalise the concept designs for the upgrade.
EY have experience from overseeing big stadium projects including Allianz Stadium, CommBank Stadium and the new Penrith Stadium.
Cox Architecture bring a wealth of expertise when it comes to designing and redesigning some of Australia’s most outstanding sporting venues.
A stakeholder workshop was held on 20 August 2024 with attendees from Wests Tigers, Sydney FC, NRL, NSWRL, Australian Professional Leagues, and APIA Leichhardt.
The workshop was facilitated by Cox Architects. The major themes from the workshop identified as priorities were the provision of female friendly players and officials’ amenities as well as a seating bowl upgrade.
As one of the outcomes of the adopted Masterplan, Council has also allocated $1.2 million to develop new Museum of Inner West Rugby League that represents the five foundational Rugby League clubs - Annandale, Balmain, Glebe, Newtown, and Wests.
The work involves renovation of the caretaker’s cottage opposite the Mary Street entrance to Leichhardt Oval and the development of the museum to display memorabilia, as well as the history and related stories related to the clubs through the use of multimedia, and also includes and an immersive, virtual museum that provides alternative access to the fans and the public. The Museum will be ready for opening before the 2026 Season.
At the Council meeting held on 18 February 2025, Council resolved the following:
That Council bring forward the finalisation of the concept design program and concept plans by Cox Architecture to the April 2025 Council meeting.
DISCUSSION
The final design concepts have been delivered following extensive investigation that involved, structural inspection of the existing concrete tiers that support the lower seating bowl to understand the options to increase seating numbers.
The work included detailed Levels survey of the concourse and seating bowl, as well as the main access points at Mary Street and Glover Street to ensure the seating options are achievable and are able to comply with accessibility requirements.
A design review of the existing western grandstand was undertaken with a view to provide an optimal spectator experience and a significant upgrade to the corporate offerings on game day. This included amenities upgrades to meet NRL, A League and super rugby standards and create the best possible facilities to stage women’s sport at an elite level.
This work has included consideration of all design standards for sporting facilities and Building Code of Australia to provide a contemporary stadium design whilst maintaining the unique character of Leichhardt Oval.
Included in the specifications for the later design will include options for the equipment and other elements that would enable the ground to be used for live music and live performance.
The project has involved rigorous design review with the architect, project manager and the quantity surveyor to ensure that the outcome provides the best value for money for Council.
Final Design Concepts
The following final design concepts have been developed (Attachment 1) by the Project Team and endorsed by the Project Control Group to proceed with preparing detailed plans in order to seek planning approval and are detailed as follows:
Western Grandstand Player Amenities
· Demolition of the existing ground floor of the Western Grandstand, and construction of new NRL compliant players facilities within an extended footprint room, officials’ change room and amenities
• All new female friendly, player and officials’ facilities, including 4 change rooms, 2 shared strapping rooms, 2 shared recovery rooms, doping control room, team kit/ briefing rooms, player medical
• A new mezzanine level gym
• Reconfiguration of ground floor public amenities and toilets
Western Grandstand – modern facilities for spectators, sponsors and media
• All new ‘Stadium’ seats for comfortable, safe and equitable experience, with allowance for add-ons (cupholder/padded seats)
• Demolition of eastern stairs to improve access to seating bowl
• New direct access to Western Grandstand from a mezzanine level with dedicated corporate, food and beverage offerings
• Reconfiguration of corporate, coaches and media boxes, and back-of-house corridors, to be airconditioned and accessible
• Renovation and reconfiguration of the Centurion’s Lounge to allow direct corporate access to dedicated seating in the Western Grandstand
Lower Seating Bowl - All new ‘stadium type’ seating to ensure safety and compliance
• Replacing the old, tired and noncompliant seating around the Oval with new ‘Stadium’ seats
• Providing multiple wheelchair accessible viewing areas and ensuring the ground meets requirements for safety, accessibility and amenity
• Demolition and relocation of northern public amenities block
• New fencing surrounding the field of play
New Northern Grandstand
• New lightweight grandstand with 1,500 seats constructed over and adjacent to the northern seating bowl renovation
• New concourse level amenities, food and beverage offerings dedicated to the northern grandstand
The final design will deliver a stadium that meets all compliance requirements for all sporting codes, significantly enhances corporate offerings and the spectator experience.
Whilst the necessary planning approvals are being obtained Council’s project manager will continue to undertake a value engineering process to ensure that Council gets the maximum value from the works.
As the detailed design is being developed further meetings will be held with all stakeholders from Wests Tigers, Sydney FC, NRL, NSWRL, Australian Professional Leagues, and APIA Leichhardt.
Project Governance
A Project Control Group (PCG) has been established, with the General Manager as the Sponsor, that will have oversight of the project.
The PCG is tasked with high-level oversight of the project, making crucial decisions that affect the project's direction, funding, and overall success. Regular monthly PCG meetings are being held to review project status, address any issues or risks, and make decisions on changes or adjustments required to keep the project on track.
Council is also engaging independent Project Assurance to ensure project integrity and risk management. Their duties will include reviewing performance, costs, and timelines, providing improvement recommendations, and preparing monthly reports for Inner West Council throughout the project.
A Project Working Group will also meet regularly to provide support the PCG. It will include subject matter experts, and stakeholders, including the Major Stakeholders identified above.
A monthly update report will be reported to Council throughout the life of the project.
Timing and Next Steps
It is currently anticipated that the planning pathway for the recommended scope would be a State Significant Development Application (SSDA) via the NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI). It is estimated that it will take until June 2026 to have a determination. Council will seek an Expression of Interest for building contractors at the end of 2025 then proceed through a select tender process to appoint the successful for a contractor to commence the work at the end of the 2026 winter season with completion in time for the 2028 season.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The Quantity Surveyor has confirmed the Project Budget breakdown and the estimated costs for the recommended design concepts are approximately $50M which is subject to further value engineering and a future procurement process to ensure that Council receives the best value for money from the project.
There is $40M funding allocated in the draft Long Term Financial Plan for the 2025/2026 financial year and Council will seek further State and Commonwealth grant funding opportunities and could potentially stage some of the works.
|
1.⇩ |
Leichhardt Oval Renovation Final Design Concepts April 2025 |
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Post Exhibition – 1-13 Parramatta Road, Annandale - Deed of Variation for Planning Agreement
Prepared By: Scott Mullen - Strategic Investments and Property Manager
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council enter into the Deed of Variation to Planning Agreement for 1-13 Parramatta Road, Annandale as provided in Attachment 1 to this report.
2. That Council authorises the General Manager to execute the Deed of Variation to Planning Agreement.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A Voluntary Planning Agreement (VPA) was previously negotiated and approved under the original DA 2017/161.
The Developer has submitted and received approval for several VPA modifications, as it has progressed through the construction phases. The VPA has remained largely the same.
On 23 August 2024, the Developer lodged modification MOD/2024/0279, including changes to the public domain, such as enhanced disability access for the public lift and reduced width for public stairs (from 2000mm to 1600mm). These changes were agreed upon by the Developer, Eranna Pty Ltd (Owner), and the Council in the amended Deed of Variation to Planning Agreement (refer Attachment 1).
The VPA value remains unchanged at $1,270,000, as reported to Council on 23 June 2020.
Under Section 7.5 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act), the VPA cannot be amended or revoked without at least 28 days' public notice.
At the Council Meeting held on18 February 2025, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council publicly exhibit the Deed of Variation for Voluntary Planning Agreement for 1-13 Parramatta Road, Annandale for a period of 28 days and seek community feedback.
2. That following the conclusion of the exhibition period, the Deed of Variation for Voluntary Planning Agreement for 1-13 Parramatta Road, Annandale be brought back to Council for consideration for adoption.
This report considers executing the Deed of Variation to Planning Agreement following the public exhibition process and consideration of public comments.
BACKGROUND
1-13 Parramatta Road, Annandale (Property) is located on the northern side of Parramatta Road to the east of Nelson Street. There is frontage to both Parramatta Road and McCarthy Lane. The total site area is approximately 1,765 square metres and it is located within a predominantly residential area, characterised by one and two storey developments.
The Property falls within the Parramatta Road Corridor Urban Transformation Strategy (PRCUTS) which identifies Johnstons Creek as a pedestrian and cycle corridor to connect Parramatta Road with Rozelle Bay.
The Property is a key link in the creation of the pedestrian and cycle path throughout the Inner West Local Government Area (LGA) as part of the strategy.
In conjunction with the PRCUTS, Council developed a draft masterplan for the Parramatta Road Urban Amenity Improvement Program (PRUAIP) for various projects to be undertaken in the LGA which included the Johnstons Creek pedestrian and cycle corridor (Masterplan).
Development Consents
DA 2017/161 relates to the Property and is for a mixed-use development that permits the demolition of existing structures and construction of a mixed-use development including a retail tenancy, 41 residential units and basement parking.
Amendments to Voluntary Agreement Subject to Public Exhibition
On 23 August 2024, the Developer lodged application MOD/2024/0279 to modify development consent D/2017/161, upgrading the public domain lift for enhanced disability access and reducing the public stairs width from 2000mm to 1600mm.
Key amendments include the following:
a) Aligning the Developer's contributions (Annexure A of the Planning Agreement) with the architectural plans from MOD/2022/0143 by:
· Installing an Orona 3g X-11 machine-room-less, industrial-strength lift with enhanced safety features, side-opening doors, and wider car for bicycles and motorized disabled access; and
· Reducing stair width by 550mm per approved DA 801 plan to accommodate the lift.
b) Updating Schedule 1, Item 5A to reflect MOD/2024/0279.
Additional minor changes include adjustments to two retail units, waste and storage rooms, basement entry ramp, and new finishes.
MOD/2024/0279, detailing architectural changes, was publicly notified from 5-26 September 2024 with no submissions received. The modification was approved by the Inner West Local Planning Panel on 10 December 2024.
The Developer, Eranna Pty Ltd (Owner), and Council agreed to the amended VPA (Attachment 1) reflecting the changes, which have minimal environmental impact and are similar to previous modifications.
The Explanatory Note has been updated and included in the amended VPA (Attachment 1, Appendix 1).
Community Engagement Methods
The 28-day public exhibition period took place between 26 February to 25 March 2025, in the form of:
· Your Say Inner West (YSIW) project page hosted online on Council’s web site; and
· A3-laminated posters placed at the entrances to the development on Parramatta Road and McCarthy Lane.
Council received a total of 5 responses (4 surveys completed online and 1 email feedback).
A majority of 80% (=4) supported the proposed deed of variation to planning agreement and 20% (=1) was unsure/ did not know.
Engagement Outcomes
Responses received are summarised as follows:
|
Response Source |
No |
Response Type |
Response Comment
|
|
YSIW |
3 |
Support |
No comment/s provided |
|
1 |
Don’t Know |
Please maximise all greening implementation. Streetscaping, canopy tree planting, pathway bed gardens. |
|
|
|
1 |
Request for clarification |
.. if more or any car spaces have been made available. Is it still going to be a studio apartment complex …. There was virtually no parking for residents provided at the time. |
|
Total |
5 |
|
|
Officers Comments
The VPA has remained largely the same since its approval under the original DA 2017/161.
Whilst the Developer has submitted and received approval for several VPA modifications, the proposed changes under modification MOD/2024/0279 will enhance the public domain outcomes, providing improved disability access for the public lift and maintaining adequate and compliant width for public stairs. These enhancements are at the Developer’s cost.
Having regard to the issues raised above, the following comments are provided for context:
· YSIW – Don’t Know comment – this relates to landscaping and greenery, which is not affected nor changed by this Deed of Variation to Planning Agreement
· Email – Request for clarification – this relates to car parking, which again is not affected nor impacted by this Deed of Variation to Planning Agreement.
The proposed changes to the VPA have been discussed and agreed to be implemented with internal Council stakeholders and technical teams, including Facilities Management, Development Engineering, Road Access Services and Disability Access Services, and in consultation with the Developer and Council’s preferred lift service contractor (TK Elevators).
It is recommended that Council now proceed and enter into the Deed of Variation to Planning Agreement and delegate authority to the General Manager to execute the VPA document.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The VPA value remains unchanged at $1,270,000, as reported to Council on 23 June 2020.
|
1.⇩ |
1-13 Parramatta Road - VPA Variation |
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Investment Policy Update
Prepared By: Sajjad Ali - Acting Chief Financial Officer
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council adopts the draft Investment Policy, as attached to the report.
2. That Council places the adopted Investment Policy on public exhibition for a period of 28 days, and provide a report back to Council if Council receives any feedback that requires an amendment to the adopted Investment Policy.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive, and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Council’s Investment Policy outlines how Council will invest funds at the most favourable return available, while also considering risk and security for that investment type, and ensuring its liquidity requirements are met.
The Investment Policy Guidelines produced by the Office of Local Government (OLG) pursuant to section 23A of the Local Government Act 1993 (Act) require Council to review its Investment Policy at least on annual basis, and amend it as required.
Following a review of the Investment Policy, Officers propose amending the draft Investment Policy by defining cash and investments, replacing the Ethical Investment section with a new Environmentally and Socially Responsible Investments section, and amending the Credit and Maturity Guidelines.
Officers recommend that Council adopts the draft Investment Policy, agrees to place the Investment Policy on public exhibition for a period of 28 days, and receives a report back only if receives any feedback that necessitates an amendment to the adopted Investment Policy.
BACKGROUND
Section 8 of the Act outlines principles of sound financial management with which councils must comply. To comply with these principles, Council has in place a range of policies including the Investment Policy, which provides a framework for Council to invest its funds at the most favourable return with due consideration of risk, security and liquidity requirements.
Council is required to review its Investment Policy on at least annual basis, in order to comply with the OLG’s Investment Policy Guidelines, which were issued in May 2010.
DISCUSSION
Proposed addition of Cash and Investment definitions
Council proposes to include definitions for Cash and Investment as follows:
|
Cash |
Cash comprises: |
|
Investment |
Investments comprise term/tailored deposits (terminology varies by institution) bonds with an active secondary market with government (including NSW T-Corp and other government treasury bodies) and Authorised Deposit-taking Institutions (ADIs).
Investment assets have maturities at the time of placement of 3 months or more. |
Proposed change to “Ethical Investment” section
Council proposes to replace the “Ethical Investment” section of the Investment Policy, with a new section entitled “Environmentally and Socially Responsible Investments”. The new section will set out Council’s commitment to investing only in environmentally, ethically and socially responsible investments (SRI), and the criteria for Council’s investment. This new section will also set out the types of environmentally and socially harmful activities in which Council will not invest.
Credit and Maturity Guidelines
Proposed Changes to Portfolio Credit Framework
To control the credit quality on the entire portfolio, the
following credit framework limits the percentage of the portfolio exposed to
any credit rating category.
As of March 2025, Council holds 16.39% of the portfolio in BBB+,BBB category.
Increasing the percent from 20% to 30% will increase Council’s ability to
take better advantage of attractive opportunities from several non-fossil fuel
lending authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs).
|
Long Term Credit Ratings |
Portfolio Max % |
|
AAA, AA+, AA, AA- |
100% |
|
A+, A, A- |
70% |
|
BBB+, BBB |
|
|
BBB- and lower & Unrated (excluding NSW TCorpIM Funds) |
0% |
|
Specific Ministerial Approved Forms of Investment |
Portfolio Max % |
|
NSW TcorpIM Funds |
20% |
Proposed changes to Institutional Credit Framework
Council’s exposure to be an individual institution is restricted by the institution’s credit rating, with the exception of the NSW TcorpIM Funds which do not have credit ratings. Increasing the upper limits will provide Council a wider choice of investment options in the A- and BBB space. This also reduces the situations when investment maturities can create breaches of these upper limits depending on which credit rating has matured.
|
Long Term Credit Ratings |
Institution Max % |
|
AAA, AA+, AA, AA- |
50% |
|
A+, A, A- |
|
|
BBB+, BBB |
|
|
BBB- and lower & Unrated (excluding NSW TCorpIM Funds) |
0% |
|
NSW TCorp IM Funds |
Max% |
|
TCORPIM Short Term Income Fund |
20% |
Proposed changes to Overall Portfolio Term to Maturity Limits
Reducing the minimum Portfolio term to maturity limits i.e. ≤ 1 year Minimum from 40% to 30% will give Council the flexibility to consider longer term maturities in the 1 to 3 year horizons and 1 to 10 year horizons if there is a lower interest rate environment going forward. Council will be able to lock in higher rates of return over longer maturity time horizons.
|
Overall Portfolio Term to Maturity Limits |
Min % |
Max% |
|
Portfolio % ≤1 year |
|
100% |
|
Portfolio % >1 year ≤10 years |
0% |
60% |
|
Portfolio % > 3 years |
0% |
|
|
Portfolio % > 5 years ≤ 10 years |
0% |
|
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with placing the Investment Policy on public exhibition.
|
1.⇩ |
Investment Policy |
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Public Exhibition - Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy
Prepared By: Julian Sakarai - Acting Senior Manager Governance and Risk
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council publicly exhibit the draft Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy for a period of 28 days and seek community feedback on the proposed Policy.
2. That following the conclusion of the exhibition period, the draft Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy be brought back to Council for consideration for adoption.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Under section 252 of the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act), Council must adopt a Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy (the Policy) within 12 months of the commencement of a new Council term. The Act also requires the public to be notified of Council’s intention to adopt or amend the Policy by allowing at least 28 days for the making of public submissions. Minor changes are proposed to the Policy as outlined in the report and it is recommended that Council agree to place the draft Policy on public exhibition.
BACKGROUND
The purpose of the Policy is to set out the expenses for which Councillors can be reimbursed, the facilities that can be provided to them, and the processes for reimbursement.
The Policy is required to comply with the Act, Local Government (General) Regulations 2021 and guidelines issued by the Office of Local Government (OLG). Council’s existing policy was adopted by Council in October 2022 and is based on the best practice template issued by the OLG.
Council is required by the Act and the Regulations to include in our Annual Report details of the cost of Councillor expenses and facilities incurred in the preceding financial year. Council’s Policy also provides for bi-annual reporting to Council on Councillor expenses and facilities.
DISCUSSION
The following table outlines the proposed changes that have been made to the current Policy and the reasons why:
|
Clause |
Change |
Reason |
|
5; 9.1-9.5; 9.22-9.31 |
Category increases - Increase of expense category limits for professional development and general travel by 10%. |
Council’s Policy was adopted in 2022. After the scheduled review, the next scheduled review will take place in 2028-2029. The expense limits for professional development/conferences and general travel costs have not changed since 2022. Costs in these categories have increased and will likely continue to increase.
|
|
9.16 |
Incidental expenses - Inclusion of permission for payment of incidental expenses for attendance at conferences, seminars and work trips. |
If a Councillor attends a conference or seminar, the Policy explicitly enables them to claim for associated costs such as the cost of travel, accommodation, and meals. It does not explicitly enable them to claim for other incidental expenses that may occur.
We consider that the inclusion of permission to pay such incidental expenses would be equitable, to enable Councillors to participate in Council events, conferences and work trips.
|
|
9.37 |
Mobile phone expenses - Reimbursement of mobile phone expenses. Additional permission to pay a flat reimbursement for any Councillor who elects not to specify the portion of the bill that is related to Council business. |
To enable Officers to pay a percentage of a mobile phone bill where a Councillor provides a percentage that is related to Council business, or a flat reimbursement of $50 where no percentage is provided.
|
|
- |
Communications support – Removal of communications support details from policy. |
The details relating to communications support will be removed and inserted into Council’s Councillor Media Policy and/or Social Media Policy.
|
|
Throughout document |
Reimbursement categories - Rearrangement, consolidation, and/or separation of certain categories in the policy. |
The expense categories in the policy do not align with the format in which Council is required to report expenses in its Annual Report. Officers recommend changing these categories to ensure consistent reporting.
This will not change any Councillor entitlements, and is a purely administrative change suggested to make Council’s reporting more robust.
|
|
Throughout document |
Removal of gender specific language |
In accordance with Council’s Gender Equity Strategy. |
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with placing the Policy on public exhibition.
|
1.⇩ |
Draft Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy - April 2025 |
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Public Exhibition - Draft Media and Social Media Policy
Prepared By: Julian Sakarai - Acting Senior Manager Governance and Risk and Jonny Browne - Strategic and Corporate Communications Manager
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council publicly exhibit the draft Media and Social Media Policy for a period of 28 days and seek community feedback on the proposed Policy.
2. That following the conclusion of the exhibition period, the draft Media and Social Media Policy be brought back to Council for consideration for adoption.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Council’s Media Policy is due for review. Officers have taken the opportunity to also review the Social Media Policy and consolidate these two policies into a single draft Media and Social Policy (draft Policy), given their closely linked subject matter. The draft Policy also incorporates the communications support sections from the Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy, which is presented separately at the April 2025 Ordinary Council Meeting. Finally, Officers have inserted into the draft Policy certain obligations from the Model Media Policy and Model Social Media Policy drafted by the Office of Local Government (OLG).
Officers recommend that Council agrees to place the draft Policy on public exhibition.
BACKGROUND
The purpose of the draft Policy is to set out a framework to assist Councillors with media relations and outline processes relating to media and social media engagement.
The draft Policy consolidates Council’s Media Policy and Social Media Policy, given the closely related subject matter of those two policies. It incorporates certain sections of the Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy that deal with the provision of communications support to Councillors. It also includes certain additional policy considerations and obligations from the Model Media Policy and Model Social Media Policy produced by the Office of Local Government (OLG).
Current Media Policy
Council’s current Media Policy was adopted in 2018. It:
· specifies the Mayor and General Manager as Council’s authorised spokespeople.
· requires operational media enquiries to be referred to Council’s Strategic and Corporate Communications team.
· provides that Councillors may express personal opinions to the media but should not speak on behalf of Council.
· outlines the approvals processes for Council media releases.
· specifies the media protocols for crisis/emergency situations.
· specifies that Councillors may be quoted in Council media releases relating to motions for which they are responsible.
· refers explicitly to Code of Conduct obligations.
Current Social Media Policy
Council’s current Social Media Policy was adopted in October 2023. It:
· recognises social media is an essential communication channel.
· provides that Councillors are responsible for the management of their own content on their own social media channels.
· provides that Councillors may express personal opinions on social media but must make clear their views are individual views that do not represent Council.
· specifies further responsibilities that Councillors have in respect of posting inappropriate content.
· outlines the Mayor’s role in respect of the posting of official social media content.
· notes that Council’s official social media platforms are administered by the Strategic Corporate and Communications Team.
· refers explicitly to Code of Conduct obligations.
Current Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy
Council’s current Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy was adopted in August 2022. It notes that:
· the Strategic and Corporate Communications team will provide support to Councillors in respect of any Council-resolved initiatives, including by drafting and distributing media releases, and promotion through council's social media channels.
· while the Mayor is to continue to be consulted on any communications, the author of a successful motion will receive the opportunity to lead on related media opportunities and to feature in photo, video or communications published by Council, and they may choose to involve other Councillors.
· Council has a responsibility to assist Councillors fulfil a core function of promoting Council’s initiatives.
· the primary purpose of Council’s communications channels is to promote the elected body’s policies and priorities, and inform the community.
· it is not a requirement for publication that all Councillors or representatives from all political groupings be included in individual photographs, videos or communications, given the variety and volume of events and initiatives at council.
DISCUSSION
The draft Policy does not depart from any of the established policy settings in any of the current Media, Social Media, or Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policies. In respect of the OLG’s Model Media and Social Media Policies, the draft Policy does not replicate all of the content from the OLG’s model policies. This is to avoid duplication with Council’s current Media and Social Media Policies, which already contain a significant amount of content addressed by the OLG’s polices.
We propose including the following from the OLG’s Model Media and Social Media Policies:
· Standards of conduct when engaging with media/social media, with specific references to the Code of Conduct.
· Specific duties for Council’s Media Coordinator.
· Protocols for media engagement in emergencies and in the lead up to elections.
· Statement that media/social media records created by Councillors in their official capacity are Council records and subject to the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009.
In respect of the standards of conduct in the OLG’s model policies, the only amendment we propose making is in relation to the prohibition on a Councillor advertising, endorsing, or soliciting commercial products or business. As drafted in the OLG’s model policies, this would potentially prevent a Councillor from, for example, sharing content on their own social media platforms that promoted a local business. We consider the intention of the wording in the OLG’s model policies is to prevent community confusion in respect of Council being perceived to endorse or advertise a product. Accordingly, we propose amending the relevant standard of conduct to clarify that a Councillor must not share information that advertises, endorses, or solicits commercial products or business, where any such advertisement, endorsement or solicitation could be construed as being conducted on behalf of Inner West Council.
We do not propose including the following from the OLG’s Social Media Policy:
· Prescriptive rules for Councillors as to how to identify as a Councillor when engaging with social media. The draft Policy incorporates content from the current Social Media Policy and therefore already addresses posting as a Councillor.
· The requirement for Councillors managing their own social media platforms to clearly display “house rules”, and follow rules in respect of blocking, banning, and hiding content. The draft Policy incorporates content from the current Social Media Policy, which leaves these matters to each Councillor’s discretion, but requires them to have regard to the importance of respectful democratic discussion and debate.
· The requirement for Councillors to advise the General Manager of any of their own social media platforms where Council content could be uploaded. It is not appropriate for Council’s General Manager to regulate Councillors’ own social media platforms.
· The more stringent records management obligations in the Model Social Media Policy, as Council already has information capture processes in place to ensure social media content can be viewed at a later date.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with placing the draft Policy on public exhibition.
|
1.⇩ |
Draft Media and Social Media Policy |
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Public Exhibition - Draft Lobbying Policy
Prepared By: Julian Sakarai - Acting Senior Manager Governance and Risk
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council publicly exhibit the draft Lobbying Policy for a period of 28 days and seek community feedback on the proposed policy. 2. That following the conclusion of the exhibition period, the draft Lobbying Policy be brought back to Council for consideration for adoption. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
At the Council meeting held on 3 December 2024, Council resolved to develop and consult on a procedure by which Councillors will be required to publicly disclose their meetings with registered lobbyists and property developers on the Council’s website in the same fashion as state ministers.
The draft Lobbying Policy (Draft Policy) (refer to Attachment 1) outlines requirements for Council to publish details of meetings between Councillors and registered lobbyists and/or property developers.
Officers recommend placing the Draft Policy on exhibition for a period of 28 days.
BACKGROUND
Lobbying is an essential part of the democratic process that can enhance decision making. However, lobbying can also create corruption risks, and undermine public confidence in decision making due to perceptions of undue influence, bias, and preferential access. It is in the public interest that lobbying is conducted in accordance with community expectations of transparency integrity and honesty.
Current Lobbying Policy
Council’s current Lobbying Policy requires lobbyists to complete a lobbyist registration form if they intend to lobby Council. While the current Lobbying Policy obliges Council Officials, to avoid inappropriate conduct during the lobbying process, the regulatory model that the current Lobbying Policy is based on focusses on lobbyists, and the actions they must take in respect of proposed lobbying.
Council Resolution
At the December 2024 Council Meeting, Council resolved to develop and consult on a procedure by which Councillors will be required to publicly disclose their meetings with registered lobbyists and property developers on the Council’s website in the same fashion as state ministers.
Lobbying of Government Officials Act 2011
The Lobbying of Government Officials Act 2011 (LOGO), among other things, obliges lobbyists to comply with a Lobbyists Code of Conduct, and register their details on a central Lobbyist Register maintained by the Electoral Commission. The Lobbyists Code of Conduct requires any lobbyist seeking to influence government policy or decision making to disclose certain information when interacting with Government Officials. LOGO and the Lobbyists Code of Conduct exclude local government officials from the definition of a Government Official. This means these requirements do not apply to lobbyists who lobby local government officials.
The requirements in LOGO and the Lobbyists Code of Conduct are supplemented, in respect of NSW State Government Ministers, by the Premier’s Memorandum “M2015-05 - Publication of Ministerial Diaries and Release of Overseas Travel Information”. The Premier’s Memorandum establishes a “meeting disclosure” model, whereby State Government Ministers must regularly publish extracts from their diaries detailing scheduled meetings held with stakeholders, external organisations, third-party lobbyists and individuals.
Ministers must publish their diary extracts one month after the end of each quarter. For third party lobbyists, the diary extract must contain the name of the lobbyist (that is, the entity), the individual lobbyists’ names, and the name of their client.
DISCUSSION
The proposed Draft Policy is based on a “meeting disclosure” model, and will apply to Councillors holding meetings with registered lobbyists or property developers in their capacity as Councillors.
The Policy will not require disclosure of any interactions with lobbyists or property developers at:
· meetings that are strictly personal, electorate, or party political;
· social or public functions or events (unless the interaction leads to a substantive discussion of issues).
The Draft Policy defines a registered lobbyist as a lobbyist required to register with the NSW Electoral Commission under section 9 of LOGO. This includes any third party lobbyist, or individual hired by a third party lobbyist. The Draft Policy uses the definition of a property developer from the Electoral Funding Act 2018, being an individual or a corporation that carries on a business mainly concerned with the residential or commercial development of land, with the ultimate purpose of the sale or lease of the land for profit.
The Draft Policy will require Councillors to document, in a template form, any meetings, or substantial or significant discussions held outside formal scheduled meetings, with registered lobbyists and/or property developers.
The Draft Policy proposes that Councillors will fill in the form and submit it to Council’s General Manager every three months, within two weeks of the end of the quarter. Councillors will still need to provide a “NIL” disclosure on the form for each quarter even if they do not have any meetings to disclose.
Officers will add the content from the forms to a register, and make the register available online on a quarterly basis, within four weeks of the end of the relevant three-month reporting period. Any updates made to the register will remain on Council’s website for 12 months after the initial date of publication of the updates.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with placing the Policy on public exhibition.
|
1.⇩ |
Draft Lobbying Policy |
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee - Minutes and Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest First Returns
Prepared By: Julian Sakarai - Acting Senior Manager Governance and Risk
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council receive the minutes and adopt the recommendations of the Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee (ARIC) meeting held on 5 March 2025.
2. That Council receive and note the Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest Returns lodged by recently appointed ARIC members, and publish these on Council’s website.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The confirmed minutes of the ARIC meeting held on 5 March 2025 are attached for Council’s consideration. This report also recommends that Council receive and note the Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest Returns (First Returns) lodged by recently appointed ARIC members.
BACKGROUND
The ARIC Terms of Reference (TOR) require the minutes of ARIC’s meetings to be provided to Council. The confirmed minutes of the ARIC meeting held on 5 March 2025 are attached for Council’s consideration.
The Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest Returns of Council’s newly appointed ARIC members have been submitted in accordance with the requirements of Council’s Code of Conduct (Code) and the ARIC TOR. These disclosures operate as a key transparency mechanism for promoting community confidence in council decision making, whether by Councillors or by staff or others under delegation or committee members.
DISCUSSION
The ARIC minutes of the meeting held on 5 March 2025 confirm to Council that the ARIC Terms of Reference (TOR) and Internal Audit Charter have been reviewed and no changes are recommended. The ARIC has also endorsed its 2025 calendar year meeting dates, being:
· 5 March 2025;
· 21 May 2025;
· 27 August 2025;
· 10 October 2025(extraordinary – draft financial statements); and
· 26 November 2025.
Council’s ARIC TOR are consistent with mandatory Model Terms of Reference issued by the Office of Local Government (OLG) within the November 2023 Guidelines for Risk Management and Internal Audit. Clause 7.8 of the ARIC TOR nominates ARIC’s independent members as Designated Persons for the purposes of the Code. Accordingly, ARIC’s independent members must complete a first return within three months of being appointed as an independent member, and then within three months of 30 June each year.
The two members appointed by Council in February 2025, Christopher Davies and Belinda Lawn, have submitted their first returns (attached). The General Manager is required under clause 4.25 of the Code to table returns at the first meeting of the Council after these are lodged. The first returns for the two newly appointed ARIC members are attached to this report. Parts C, D, and I of the attached returns have been intentionally left blank as the OLG’s Model Code of Conduct: A guide to completing returns of interest states that designated persons completing their first returns are not required to answer Part C, D and I.
In addition, ARIC members must at any time during their tenure, submit updated returns when they become aware of any changes that may affect their previously submitted returns. There are no updated returns from ARIC members to be tabled. The other independent member, Chair Ilona Meyer, does not need to complete a new return as she has completed her annual return for this period, which is available on Council’s website.
The information contained in the returns is made publicly available in accordance with the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009, the Government Information (Public Access) Regulation 2009 and any guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner. Certain personal information has been redacted in attached returns in accordance with this requirement. The attached returns will be made available on Council’s website following this meeting.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
|
1.⇩ |
Draft Minutes - ARIC 5 March 2025 |
|
2.⇩ |
Disclosure of Pecuniary Interests Form - Belinda Lawn |
|
3.⇩ |
Disclosure of Pecuniary Interests Form - Chris Davies |
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Development Assessment Initiatives to Improve Housing Supply
Prepared By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
Authorised By: Peter Gainsford - General Manager
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council endorse the criteria describing significant residential development for items to be considered by the new Inner West Residential Panel as development applications or modifications that have: a) 20 or more residential dwellings b) Boarding houses c) Co living d) Subdivision for residential development that would result in new housing.
2. That Council note that funding has been allocated in the draft 2025/26 budget for the position of City Architect and endorse the key responsibilities for the City Architect.
3. That Council launch the Development Assessment survey in May 2025.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
At the Council meeting held on 18 February 2025, Council considered three reports that provided a number of development assessment initiatives to improve housing supply. They were the establishment of the new residential development panel, the creation of a position for a City Architect and a post development assessment survey.
New Residential Development Panel
At the Council meeting held on 18 February 2025, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council establish a new Residential Development Panel to assess significant residential development applications and proposals under the new Inner West Local Environment Plan (LEP).
2. That the new panel provide a simplified and consistent approach to the assessment of significant residential developments, accelerating the approval and determination process and contributing to the delivery of new housing in the Inner West.
3. That the new panel convene regularly and will be responsible for reviewing and assessing significant residential development projects in accordance with the new LEP. This should include both the determination of applications Council is the consent authority for, as well as the assessment process for applications that are to be determined by the Eastern Sydney Planning Panel.
4. That panel membership will include the following key decision-makers:
a) General Manager;
b) Director of Planning;
c) General Counsel; and
d) City Architect (once recruited).
5. That panel responsibilities will include:
a) reviewing significant residential development applications and rezoning proposals based on planning, infrastructure, and legal considerations;
b) ensuring efficiency, consistency and clarity in the assessment process; and
c) reporting regularly to Council on the outcomes of panel reviews and the progress of housing delivery within the Inner West.
6. That Council officers develop and report criteria for significant residential development assessments to the April 2025 Council meeting. These criteria will guide the new Panel in reviewing applications for major developments under the new LEP and should include a value threshold, the scale and size of the development, and high-quality design and sustainability standards.
The proposed criteria describes significant residential development for the Inner West as development applications or modifications that have the following:
· 20 or more residential dwellings
· Boarding houses
· Co living
· Subdivision for residential development that would result in new housing
The panel will meet monthly or as required and consist of:
· The General Manager
· Director of Planning
· General Counsel
· City Architect
Matters that meet the threshold for consideration by the panel will be placed on the agenda at each of the following key stages of an application;
· Lodgment – when the application is lodged with Council and allocated to an assessment officer and referrals requested
· On receipt of specialist referrals
· Post neighbour notification
· Draft Request for Information (RFI)
· Request for Information response
· Draft Assessment Report including draft conditions
· Post Regional Planning Panel briefing (if relevant)
· Prior to determination
Additionally at each panel meeting, for information purposes, the Panel will be provided with an update on any:
· Request for Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARS)
· State Significant Development Applications
· EOI for Housing Delivery Authority
The panel will ensure reasonable assessment timeframes, by managing any resourcing or performance issues that may be impacting on referral and assessment timeframes. It will see first hand any process issues that may impact on timeframes and oversee any improvement initiatives in the development assessment area. The panel will also be reviewing the number of Land and Environment Court matters and ways to reduce the number these and their costs. Any survey feedback, customer sentiment analysis, assessment and referral timeframes will be reported to the panel.
A copy of the terms of reference for the Residential Development Panel is attached.
City Architect
At the Council meeting held on 18 February 2025, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council introduce the role of City Architect to oversee and lead and guide architectural and urban design initiatives within the council, ensuring alignment with Council’s vision for sustainable, inclusive, and well-designed built environments.
2. That Council include the creation of the City Architect position in the 2025/26 Budget with the position to sit within the Planning Directorate under the Director of Planning.
3. That Council develop a job description and recruitment strategy for the City Architect, ensuring the role is filled by a highly experienced and qualified professional with a deep understanding of urban design, public policy, and community engagement. A report on the proposed responsibilities for the position is to be tabled at the April 2025 Ordinary Council meeting. Key responsibilities are to include:
b) Collaborate with proponents, architects, and urban planners to ensure high quality architectural results across the Inner West.
c) Champion sustainability and high-quality architecture in all developments.
d) Create design guidelines that preserve the inner west character while promoting innovative solutions.
e) Engage with the community to incorporate local needs into urban design decisions.
The position of City Architect has been funded within the draft 2025/26 operation plan and budget. A position description is being developed and staff are currently being consulted about the position and how it is located within the structure of the Planning Directorate.
There are City Architects positions at City of Sydney, Blacktown and Ryde Council. These positions have a strong focus on the public domain and public domain improvements being delivered by council. At Inner West Council, these functions sit within the newly created Property and Major Projects Directorate.
As the Inner West City Architect is to be located in the Planning Directorate the role will provide advisory services in the design development of any public domain, significant council buildings, major parks and open space works.
As part of the creation of this role that will report to the Director of Planning, it is proposed to move all the heritage specialists that sit within the development assessment team under the City Architect to strengthen the provision of design advice while understanding and retaining an appreciation of heritage significance and relevance in development applications.
The City Architect would also play a key role with respect to the Architectural Excellence and Design Review panel in the provision of expert advice on urban design and architectural quality to inform the assessment of those development applications that are referred to the Panel.
Key Accountabilities for the role are as follows:
· Advise on the design and planning of public spaces, parks, streetscapes, and civic buildings being developed within the Property and Major Projects Directorate.
· Collaborate with proponents, architects, and urban planners to ensure high-quality architectural results across the Inner West.
· Champion sustainability and high-quality architecture in all developments.
· Help shape the Inner West Heritage Development Control Plan through the creation of design guidelines that preserve the inner west character while promoting innovative solutions
· Engage with the community to incorporate local needs into urban design decisions.
· Lead a team that provides heritage advice for development assessment
· Participate in design review processes, ensuring a fair and balanced assessment that supports economic and social outcomes.
· Assist in streamlining council’s design review and assessment processes to improve efficiency.
· Provide expert architectural and urban design advice on development applications, planning proposals and other relevant design negotiations, with a focus on facilitating high-quality outcomes for applicants while maintaining planning integrity.
· Provide practical guidance on heritage conservation, ensuring recommendations are not overly restrictive and allow for reasonable development outcomes
· Advocate for a pragmatic approach to heritage and environmental matters, thereby encouraging a culture shift within council towards a more solutions-focused approach to planning and development.
· Lead initiatives that promote design excellence while supporting flexibility in planning controls.
· Provide architectural input into planning reforms that simplify development processes and improve design outcomes.
· Work closely with planning, heritage, and environmental teams to ensure development advice is reasonable, outcome-focused, and does not create unnecessary delays.
· Encouraging a culture shift within council towards a more solutions-focused approach to planning and development.
· Commitment to proactive problem-solving in development assessment.
· Willingness to challenge overly rigid interpretations of planning control
Post Development Assessment Survey
At the Council meeting held on 18 February 2025, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council introduces a post Development Application (DA) survey for all projects within the Inner West Local Government Area.
2. That Council draft and design a survey to gather feedback on the effectiveness of the DA process, satisfaction with communication and engagement throughout the application and approval process, the timeliness and transparency of decisions, the overall quality of the final development including its impact on infrastructure, public space and the local context and recommendations to improve the process.
3. That Council delivers a draft survey and implementation plan to the next Council meeting.
The questions have been developed with the assistance of Council’s customer experience manager and will be hosted using the same platform as council uses for its Customer Request Management survey response. This platform allows for sentiment analysis from all the free text and quality reporting that will be provided back to assessment staff and the Residential Development Panel.
Development Application Lodgment
|
Question |
Answer |
|
Which of the following best describes your role in the application: a) a property owner of the site that was the subject of the application b) an Industry Professional c) a property owner of a neighbouring site d) other |
Multi Choice |
|
If you are an Industry Professional (Planner, Architect, Designer, Developer etc) who did you represent: a) property owner of subject site b) business owner c) yourself
|
Multi Choice |
|
Have you lodged a Development Application with Inner West or any other NSW Council previously? a) no, this is my first experience b) yes, I have lodged an application before c) yes, I’m a regular applicant
|
Multi Choice |
|
Were you asked for additional information before your application was accepted for lodgment? |
Yes / No / Don’t know |
|
Is there anything else you would like to tell us about the lodgment process?
|
Free Text |
‘Satisfaction with communication and engagement’
|
Once the application was lodged, did the assessment officer call /arrange a meeting to introduce themselves? |
Yes / No / Don’t know |
|
Once the neighbour notification was complete were you advised how many submissions were received? |
Yes / No/ N/A |
|
Did the assessment require the input of Council referral specialists? |
Yes / No / Don’t know |
|
Which communication methods did you experience during the application? (select all that are applicable) a) Telephone Conversation b) Email correspondence directly with the Assessment Officer c) Letter d) Virtual meeting e) Face to Face meeting f) Meeting on site
|
Multi-choice |
|
Throughout the assessment of the application was the council officer available to meet or discuss your application with you? |
Yes / No / N/A |
|
Is there anything else you would like to tell us about the communication and engagement? |
Free Text |
‘Timeliness & Transparency’
|
If additional information was requested, the reasons for the information or amended plans was clearly communicated to me in a way that I understood.
|
Agree/Disagree |
|
How long did the application take from lodgment to determination? a. 2 months b. 2-4 months c. 4-6 months d. 6-8 months e. 8-10 months f. 10-12 months g. 1 year +
|
Multi Choice |
|
Once the application was determined did you receive your Notice of Determination within 14 days? |
Yes / No / Don’t Know |
|
Is there anything else you would like to tell us about the timeframe taken? |
Free Text |
‘Recommendations to improve the process’
|
Do you have any suggestions on how the delivery of the process could be improved?
|
Free text |
Distribution and completion of Survey
The approximate time for the above mentioned questions is 5-8 minutes. Council’s response for past surveys that was distributed as part of issuing the determination is approximately 1%. Currently Council is getting a 13% response rate for a customer request survey form.
Council staff have been looking at opportunities to increase the completion rate and have sought advice from Planning Industry professionals as to how this could be improved. Feedback received suggested that a survey be sent out a few weeks after the application is determined.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Funding has been allocated in the draft 2025/26 budget for the City Architect all other components of this report can be delivered within existing resources
|
1.⇩ |
Residential Panel Terms of Reference |
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Draft Economic Development Budget 2025-26
Prepared By: Daniel East - Senior Manager Strategic Planning
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council supports modifying the draft economic development budget to establish an annual grant program to support Inner West Business Chambers / Networks / Associations. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
3: Creative communities and a strong economy |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report provides an overview of the existing draft 2025/2026 economic development budget and proposes a key change to support the establishment of an annual grant program for local business chambers / networks / associations.
The report also outlines the professional support provided by the Economic Development Team to various projects and programs of both Council and local business.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 18 February 2025, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council requests a report from Council staff on how the 2025/2026 economic development budget could be best utilised.
2. That Council consider in the report whether to directly support local Chambers of Commerce and other collaborative projects on a competitive, grant funding basis.
3. That Council notes that Chambers of Commerce play a critical role in supporting local businesses, advocating for economic development, and fostering vibrant commercial precincts.
4. That Council ensures that the report includes:
a) an assessment of current funding allocations and support mechanisms for Chambers of Commerce;
b) options for direct funding, capacity-building initiatives, and strategic partnerships to strengthen Chambers' ability to support local businesses;
c) consideration of best-practice models from other councils in supporting business chambers; and
d) opportunities for Chambers to collaborate on joint initiatives that drive local economic growth.
5. That Council ensures that the report is presented to Council in time to inform the 2025/2026 budget process.
DISCUSSION
The draft 2025/2026 economic development budget currently focuses on activities that grow the skills and capacity of local businesses and support business sustainability. Local businesses frequently seek the support of council to
· Promote and market the businesses offerings in LGA to support for foot traffic
· Enhance the main streets including the built environment and activations
· Improve their engagement with Council processes including development assessment and compliance
· Provide business support through networking and workshops
· Help businesses overcome impediments and challenges
· Support for business chambers and the creative arts sector
· Advocate for enhanced transport options and implementing active transport solutions
· Support for the late-night economy
Below is a table showing the planned expenditure by the Economic Development Team for 2025/26
Table of draft Budget 2025/2026 Economic Development
|
Project |
Activity Description |
Budget Amount |
|
Business Chambers / Networks Funds are paid directly to the chamber to support the chambers own economic activities or are paid to the chamber to support business initiatives |
Business support Direct to Chamber · Marrickville Urban Centres Program ($67,500) · Newtown Enmore Urban Centres Program ($35,000) · Inner West Creative Network (25,000) |
$160,000 $127,500 |
|
Public domain beautification |
Flags / Banners / Bin skins / fairy lights / laneways / shop front decals (for long term vacant premises) |
$225,840 |
|
Tourism Strategy |
Implement tourism actions |
$200,000 |
|
On road dining - Concrete Barriers |
Continue to deliver opportunities for businesses to use approved roads for outdoor dining. |
$100,000 |
|
Small campaigns and business awards |
Projects that support sector growth: Inner West Distillery trail Online campaigns Business plaques (business operating 25 years or more) Small festival grants |
$45,350 |
|
Economic Development Strategic Plan |
To assist with implementing actions in the plan. |
$25,000 |
|
Implement specific strategies state government projects |
For example, re-accreditation of Purple Flag, Neon Market Place, Up Town, RAP, Disability Action Plan |
$21, 086 |
|
Total |
$904,776 |
Current Funding Process for Business Chambers
Currently, Council supports business chambers as follows
· inviting them to apply for funding on a quarterly basis, based on an initial allocation and then for unallocated funds for specific activities that Council then requires a form of grant acquittal back to Council – this does not allow Chambers to strategically plan in advance
· via an “Urban Centre Program” – ie. Marrickville Chamber of Commerce – funds are utilised to engage a part time coordinator, and to implement activities such as maintaining a web presence, marketing and promoting the area, social media actions, retain existing members and recruit new members
· based on a Notice of Motion regarding a lump sum (Inner West Creative Network).
Options for Direct funding to Business Chambers
There are currently nine formal Chambers or associated business groups operating in the LGA, being
1. ASHBiz – Ashfield, Summer Hill, Haberfield
2. Balmain/Rozelle Chamber
3. Leichhardt Chamber – known as Viva Leichhardt
4. Marrickville Chamber of Commerce – businesses on Marrickville and Illawarra Road only
5. Newtown Chamber – known as Enmore Newtown Business Community
6. Asian Business Association
7. Inner West Breweries Association
8. Inner West Distillery Group
9. Inner West Creative Network
The introduction of a once year annual grant application to better support Inner West business chambers and associations to plan their activities is recommended. Councils that operate such a process include:
· Canterbury Bankstown Council - has several business grant programs for targeted sectors that require matching dollar-for-dollar funding up to a maximum of $2,000. Businesses must have an annual turnover between $100,000 and $5m.
· City of Sydney - has a business support grant for sector development projects that grow the skills and capacity of local businesses. Funding up to $50,000 per year is available for not-for-profit organisations and chambers or industry association are eligible.
· Newcastle City Council - provide a number of funding opportunities to support business initiatives that contribute to the social, cultural, environmental, and economic life of the City.
Currently in total $287,500 is paid to Chambers / Networks to either directly support their own initiatives or paid to them on behalf of member or local businesses to run specialist campaigns or activities.
This could instead by paid as a grant amount of $32,000 to each of the 9 Chamber/Network . Associations. This approach is consistent with action A.28 within the draft Economic Development Strategy to “review the economic assistance currently provided to business chambers to best support the local economy”
For precincts that do not have a formal chamber the Economic Development Team will continue to work directly with local businesses to implement activities and promotions to encourage out of area visitation and spend.
Capacity Building and Strategic Partnerships
Capacity building and developing partnerships is a key action within the draft Economic Development Strategy. Strategic Direction 3: Foster a productive and resilient economy seeks to ensure local businesses benefit from Council assets and resources, are supported in their future growth, and employment opportunities increase within the local government area. While two of the twelve key actions are supported by Council’s procurement and contracts process the others include a strategic approach to knowledge sharing, networking, business attraction and partnering through the activities of the economic development team.
A significant success both past and ongoing with respect to capacity building has been the success of the Women in Business (WIB) support network, organised and run by the Inner West Economic Development Team. This program includes identification of an area of challenge coupled with a program to assist women in business to understand and overcome the challenge in support of their business. Currently the focus is on marketing. The WIB program also includes a mentoring program, a quarterly talk series and a collaboration with the Inner West chapter of Women with Altitude.
Similarly the Council Team run joint workshops with other government institutions such as the ATO and provide support for business run by those more fluent in other community languages. The Brewers and Distillers Action Plan which is close to completion is a further example of partnershipping success. The team is well placed to work closely with Chambers, Networks and Associations to provide a targeted capacity building program.
Joint Initiatives
Purple Flag is an example of a successful joint initiative both in its initial and subsequent reaccreditation. The development of Special Entertainment Precincts across the Inner West is another a key project led by Inner West with the engagement of local business through the Economic Development Team. Other projects led by the Economic Others include the delivery of a range of mainstreets revitalisation projects such as outdoor / footpath furniture and verge greening, where local businesses worked with council officers to deliver main streets improvements.
The Economic Development Team convenes and reports on the Brewers and Distillers Action Plan, and most recently has coordinated a range of fun and engaging short videos from members that will form the core of a new and vibrant social media campaign.
Future Capability Focus and Benchmarking
In the most recent Community Satisfaction Survey (2024) both creative communities with a strong economy and support for local jobs and business continue to be areas of challenge for council operations and of community interest and concern.
There is opportunity within the Economic Development Team through existing vacancies to align the skill set and capability of the team to better meet community and local business expectations. This includes
· Place making & beautification
· Local business liaison both across chambers and with council especially given the recent significant increase in grant funding available to local business communities
· Capacity building through targeted workshops
· Night time and visitor economy – strategic development and implementation
· Marketing / Branding / Campaign development and design
· Innovation start ups
Benchmarking of two neighbouring Council’s has been recently conducted. This was a useful exercise to understand what works well in other similar organisations and whether there is opportunity for improvement.
The Inner West Economic Development Team consists of two full time officers and a third position which is currently vacant.
Canterbury Bankstown Council has an Economic Development Team of six, consisting of a coordinator with five officers. The focus for Canterbury Bankstown is delivering their Economic Development Strategy, business and events partnerships and marketing their city. Georges River Council has two teams, with five team members and two coordinators collectively making a total of seven. The focus for Georges River is developing a new strategy, innovation and the night time economy. While team size is only one consideration when considering capacity it suggests that currently the Inner West team is underservicing the local economy and business community. A skills audit and a review of positions in the light of the capability focus is underway.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Setting up an annual grant program to fund the nine existing Chambers / Networks / Associations is proposed to be budget neutral. It can be funded utlising the current budget allocation already set aside for this purpose being $287,500. There are currently 9 formal chambers or groups and this would result in an annual grant of $32,000 per group if equally allocated.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Public Exhibition - Draft Economic Development Strategy
Council at its meeting on 18 February 2025 resolved that the matter be deferred.
Prepared By: Daniel East - Senior Manager Strategic Planning
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council publicly exhibit the draft Economic Development Strategy for a period of 28 days and seek community feedback on the proposed Strategy.
2. That following the conclusion of the exhibition period, the draft Economic Development Strategy be brought back to Council for consideration for adoption.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
3: Creative communities and a strong economy |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Inner West Economic Development Strategy 2025-2030 outlines the key economic strategic drivers for the Inner West and the actions Council will take to boost economic growth in the Inner West. The Strategy has been developed in collaboration with local business chambers, sector associations, businesses, key industry groups, community members and stakeholders. The principle of ensuring as many community members benefit from a more inclusive economy otherwise known as Community Wealth Building has been instilled into the Strategy.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 13 September 2022, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council commits to becoming Australia’s leading Community Wealth Building council by adopting the pillars of Community Wealth Building into our Inner West Council Economic Development Strategy;
2. That in preparation for the Economic Development Strategy:
a) Staff consult with the Democracy Collaborative on the pillars of Community Wealth Building before the end of 2022; and
b) Identify local anchor institutions such as universities and TAFE, hospitals, schools, sporting clubs, community and First Nations organisations and large local employers and businesses to be part of the development of the Economic Development Strategy, in addition to residents and other stakeholders.
3. That Council holds an Inner West Economic Summit early in 2023, and includes those local anchor institutions, in addition to residents and other stakeholders, to discuss people-centered economic development.
To inform the creation of the Economic Development Strategy, Council hosted two Inner West Economic Summits, a multicultural roundtable and a Your Say Page as part of the consultation process with stakeholders. The summits brought together in total over 137 attendees representing local business owners attended. Other consultations included businesses, local anchor institutions, Bendigo Bank, job network providers, large employers, TAFE, Investment NSW, local manufacturers, universities, creative sector and local business chambers. The Your Say Page received 114 visitors to the page.
From feedback received the main priority areas raised were to:
· Promote and market the businesses offerings in LGA to support for foot traffic
· Enhance the main streets including the built environment and activations
· Improve Council processes including DA times and Compliance
· Provide business support through networking and workshops
· Help businesses overcome impediments and challenges
· Support for business chambers and the creative arts sector
· Enhance Transport options to town centres including active transport
· Community safety in relation to encouraging the late-night economy
In addition, SGS Economics and Planning were engaged to provide a clearer understanding of how to embed the principles of community wealth building into a new Economic Development Strategy within the Inner West context. The following pillars have formed an overarching principle in the development of the strategy:
· Progressive procurement of goods and services;
· Fair employment and just labour markets;
· Socially productive use of land and property;
· Marking financial power work for local places; and
· Plural ownership of the economy.
To develop the strategy, data and research relating to the Inner West economic profile was analysed to identify both opportunities and challenges to growing and supporting the local economy. The data relied upon was sourced from Economy.id, Population Census data, ATO income data, Centrelink and Labour Force Survey data.
DISCUSSION
The draft document has a range of goals and actions that have been prioritised to ensure the best possible outcomes are achieved for the LGA over the next five years.
The draft Strategy is structured around 5 Key Strategic Directions as follows:
1. Leverage existing competitive advantages of the Inner West
2. Create people-centric places supported by integrated infrastructure
3. Foster a productive and resilient economy
4. Embrace opportunity, ideas and innovation
5. Promote a green, sustainable and circular economy
A series of goals sit under each of the Key Directions, with actions highlighting how those goals will be achieved. Every action in the plan has a council officer and a timeline for delivery nominated against it.
Should the Strategy be endorsed for further community consultation, it will include:
· 'Your Say Inner West’ page with an online survey
· Flyer to local businesses
· Drop in sessions for businesses and community in Councils libraries during the week, evenings and weekend
· Engagement and consultation with the Local Democracy Groups
· Specific meetings with business chambers and business associations
· Social media posts
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report. Where specific projects arise from the Strategy, these will be programmed and costed into the relevant budget.
|
1.⇩ |
Draft Economic Development Strategy 2025-2030 |
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Proposed Tourism Action Plan Expenditure and Bi-monthly update on Brewers and Distillers Action Plan
Prepared By: Daniel East - Senior Manager Strategic Planning
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
3: Creative communities and a strong economy |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A Tourism Action Plan has been developed that aligns with the yet to be released NSW Government’s Visitor Economy Strategy Review. The Plan focuses on key actions that will drive tourism expenditure and help position the Local Government Area (LGA) as a visitor destination.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 25 June 2024, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council adopt the Inner West Brewers and Distillers Implementation Action Plan.
2. That Council commence development of an Inner West Tourism Action Plan to help guide and support local economic growth and enhanced vibrancy and amenity, with a draft Plan to be presented to Council at or by the December 2024 meeting.
3. That the Plan is to be developed through engagement with local residents, business chambers and industry associations, and the Inner West Creative Network.
4. That the Plan include a specific focus on the Inner West Ale Trail, existing and proposed Special Entertainment Precincts, opportunities to identify breweries as standalone venues under the SEPs, and opportunities to support more live music and cultural events.
5. That, as part of the Plan, $200,000 be allocated to an Inner West Tourism Fund out of the 2024-25 budget to fund implementation of action items developed through the Plan.
6. That Council receive a bi-monthly report on progress of the Inner West Brewers and Distillers Implementation Action Plan.
The Inner West Tourism Action Plan is a key deliverable of the Inner West Brewers Action Plan and is Action A5. from the draft Economic Development Strategy.
The Tourism Action Plan (TAP) focuses on guiding and supporting local economic growth and enhanced vibrancy and amenity. The TAP was developed in consultation with Destination NSW to ensure Council’s TAP aligns to the work the NSW Government planning to achieve $91 billion in the “experience tourism” economy expenditure by 2035. The TAP has been informed by research, and information gathered from key state strategies and Council plans. Council’s draft Economic Development Strategy highlights the importance of the tourism industry for the local economy as does Council’s Inner Breweries and Distilleries Industry action plan. Council staff have use new data to inform the development of the TAP and targeted actions that will help champion the visitor economy and unlock its full potential for the LGA.
DISCUSSION
Staff have developed a Tourism Action Plan that is aligned the NSW Government’s Visitor Economy Strategy Review that is due to be released later this year and aims to achieve $91 billion in the tourism expenditure by 2035. The Plan focuses on actions that will showcase the LGA and help build awareness and drive economy expenditure within the sector.
NSW Visitor Economy
The NSW Visitor Economy 2035 was expected for release in March 2025, however this important and relevant strategy is not yet available. The visitor economy includes the direct and indirect contributions to the economy resulting from a person travelling outside of their normal place of residence. Over $52 billion in visitor expenditure was spent in NSW from July 2023 to end June 2024, with City of Sydney the most visited LGA for all visitor types. NSW was Australia’s top destination for international visitors, visitor nights and expenditure during the period. There were 3.7 million international visitors to NSW during this period up 35.6% from previous year, and they spent a record $12.2 billion an increase in expenditure of 41.1% for the period. The top three international source markets to NSW were the United States, New Zealand and China.
The visitor spend in NSW continues to grow and creates one in every 26 jobs in the state. It supports over 116,000 businesses and over 292,000 jobs including a range for businesses in accommodation, hospitality and food services, visitor experiences, transport services, retail, travel services, culture, arts and recreation sectors.
The top source markets for the Inner West LGA are the United Kingdom, New Zealand and China with many visiting friends and relatives. The table shows visitor expenditure in the Inner West for 2023.
|
Inner West LGA |
Visitors |
Nights |
Expenditure |
|
International |
89,400 |
2,606,900 |
$277.3m |
|
Domestic overnight |
329,000 |
880,000 |
$144.4m |
|
Domestic day |
595,000 |
- |
$73.3m |
|
Total |
1,013,700 |
3,486,900 |
$495.0m |
The source is Tourism Research Australia, National and International Visitor Surveys 2023.
Domestic day visitors are those who travelled to this area on a round trip of at least 50km from home, for a duration of a minimum of four hours, but did not stay a night away from home.
A review conducted by Destination NSW, on the NSW visitor economy found that visitors seek interactive experiences that allow them to connect with local culture, natural landscapes and people. This includes nature-based experiences, culinary and agritourism, art and culture, nightlife, first nations experiences and wellness. Research from BDA Marketing Planning and Tourism Research Australia reported the key experience drivers influencing decision-making among both domestic and international visitors when planning a holiday included:
· NSW residents: good food and wine (43%), coastal and beach experiences (40%), history and heritage (30%) and great shopping (27%)
· Interstate visitors: good food and wine (43%), coastal and beach experiences (40%), history and heritage (31%) and road trips (30%)
· International visitors: locations that offer beautiful natural environments (31%), good food and beverages (27%), natural wonders (22%) and culturally significant sites (19%)
In addition, the review found the following opportunities should also be considered:
· Visitors are looking for authenticity and want to go where the locals go
· Develop and promote self-guided walks around Sydney’s arts and cultural institutions
· Further develop multicultural precincts around Western Sydney
· Nature and wellness identified as key opportunities for future growth
· Opportunities to market NSW’s “early morning” culture
· Large opportunities to create experience trails: food, cycling, nature walks
· Destination NSW to promote more regional drive itineraries.
This data informed the approach taken to developing the TAP and presents a strong focus in identifying what visitors are looking for in experience tourism. Clearly visitors are after diverse experiences and the Inner West with its unique character is well positioned to build a compelling visitor destination story.
Strategic Considerations
Council’s role in building the tourism economy
Council’s role in building the tourism economy is to encourage the development of products and experiences that benefit the both the community and visitors. To date Council’s strategic approaches to support the growth in the visitor economic includes:
Support
· Secured Enmore Road as a Special Entertainment Precinct and expanding this to six other locations. The Special Entertainment Precinct encourages live music in local businesses to host live music or entertainment without consent from Council. This provides an opportunity for businesses to tap into potential new markets and meet customer needs when it comes to the night-time and visitor economy.
· Growing the cultural and creative sector by opening our town halls for creative use. The Inner West is the cultural capital of NSW. It is home to the highest number of residents employed in cultural industries, is a hub of small-to-medium live music venues and art spaces including a huge outdoor street art gallery, with over 150 site specific works commissioned by Council. The area is celebrated for its all-embracing and dynamic creative sector, and the significant cultural contribution it makes locally, nationally and across the globe in attracting the visitor economy.
Partnerships
· Collaboration with industry groups to host activities that showcase the LGA. This has included partnerships with Biennale of Sydney to deliver cultural programs at White Bay Power Station and partnership with SXSW Sydney that saw the delivery of a live music showcase on Enmore Rd with multiple venues. 2024, was the first year this was held which saw 6,500 attendees to event program with all participating venues at capacity. SXSW connection provides us with access to International and National visitors.
· Joint activities with sectors that are attractors of out of area visitors including distillers and local breweries who have helped positioned the Inner West as the craft brewery capital of Australia. Project work that promotes eat streets, heritage pubs and live music scheme helps drive interest into the LGA which has a flow on effect to other enterprises.
Facilitate
· Council facilitates infrastructure projects that uplift the area and maintain our roads, streets, foreshore walks, recreational facilities, aquatic centres, parks and tidal pools including PAMP footpath upgrade program. In 2023-2024 financial year Council delivered more than $99.2M in capital works. Council is investing $7.5 million to make our main streets more vibrant and welcoming precincts.
· Delivering innovative annual program of festivals and events that cater for a range of audiences that help to create vibrant places where people want to go, stay, and explore what is on offer all of which can strengthen economic outcomes in the visitor economy.
Strengths and Opportunities
The key focus area in experience tourism for NSW are interactive experiences. The Inner West has a lot to offer the visitor economy with cultural precincts and their eat streets, live music venues, events, theatres, heritage pubs, ale trails, galleries and studios run by independent designers with an artesian culture to discover. Often these attractions are within a walkable precinct and close to each other. The area’s strong arts and culture has positioned the Inner West as the cultural capital of NSW and the home for more independently owned venues, creative businesses and artists than any other local government area in NSW. This significant cultural contribution plus our safe nighttime economy cannot be overlooked in the value they bring to the appeal of the inner west as a tourism destination.
Council’s Creative Trails program is a vibrant showcase of creativity that has local studios open their doors to host for talks, exhibitions, tours, and workshops. Our public art program has over 170 street murals in the Inner West, with approximately 20 new works each year. With data showing that visitors are looking for self-guided walks around arts and culture this presents an opportunity for Council to explore options for creating guided and/ or self-guided tours. This should build a greater awareness of Inner West artists and help create a compelling visitor experience.
Council curates a vibrant annual program of festivals and events that cater for a range of audiences including families, live music buffs, diverse communities and LGBTQ+. These activities make a significant contribution to the visitor economy and provide opportunities to showcase local talent. They create a reason for people to come and explore what is on offer.
Challenges and Needs
Driving demand and awareness are a key challenge for the LGA. Development and growth of the tourism economy requires a thoughtful approach to showcasing what is available. Tourists do not go to council websites when exploring and developing a holiday itinerary. For this reason there is an increase on introducing standalone website that promote tourism experiences within an LGA. The development of a standalone Destination Inner West website that promotes tourism experiences that targets both domestic and international tourism markets will help showcase the area’s appeal, fuel interest and boost growth now and in coming years.
Enhancing the visitor experience once they are in the LGA also leverages the LGA as destination. Tourism wayfinding enriches the visitors’ experience when navigating self-guide walks and cultural precincts. Tourism wayfinding signage at key transport hubs directing visitors adds to the area’s appeal and assists in growing visitation.
Information gathered from consultation with chambers and businesses from the two economic development summits held in 2023 and the Breweries and Distilleries Roundtable highlighted the need for a stronger approach to marketing the Inner West as a place to visit.
The Tourism Action Plan – Project to Grow the Visitor Economy
The actions outlined in the TAP below aim to strengthen the position of the Inner West in the visitor economy, so that local business and the community stand out in a crowded marketplace and build industry capacity. It builds demand and creates awareness.
|
Expenditure of $200,000 Inner West Tourism Fund |
|||
|
No |
Action |
Rational |
Est Costs |
|
Tourism wayfinding signage at three major transport hubs that lead to key cultural precincts and tourism experiences. · Sydenham/Marrickville · Balmain/Rozelle · Newtown/Enmore |
Investing in tourism wayfinding infrastructure enhances the visitor experience when navigating cultural precincts and will support future demand in the visitor economy.
|
$85,000 |
|
|
2. |
Development of a standalone Destination Inner West website to promote tourism experiences that targets both domestic and international tourism markets. This tool can be featured on Destination NSW, Neon Market Place and be used in conjunction with and via other mediums to showcase the LGA.
|
Visitors are unlikely to visit council websites when looking at what to do in the Inner West. An externally hosted website will help showcase the Inner West’s appeal to help fuel interest & boost growth now and in coming years. |
$85,000 |
|
3. |
Explore options for creating guided and/or self-guided arts and culture tours and destination maps, including digital strategies |
New data on experience tourism shows there is strong interest in arts & culture tours and clusters of walkable sites. Curated experiences and maps will create compelling visitor experiences. Ie Heritage Ale Trail, |
$20,000 |
|
4. |
Council Resolution: Sydenham Road Strategy
That Council target a portion of the $200,000 Inner West Tourism Strategy to support businesses surrounding Sydenham Station – including microbreweries, cafes and distilleries - to benefit from additional pedestrian traffic from the Metro.
|
ReVITALise Sydenham has been the successful subject of a $1M TfNSW Grant. Early work to develop a scope for the project is underway – a minimal amount is required to kick start this project. |
$10,000 |
|
5. |
Continue to work on key infrastructure and assets that creates vibrant and welcoming precincts and places to enhance the visitor experience |
Place is a fundamental element in the delivery of the visitor economy as people want to visit places that are welcoming, visually appealing and safe. |
Within current budgets |
|
6. |
Continue to curate a vibrant annual program of festivals and events |
Delivering events helps celebrate unique characteristics of the area and compels people to visit. |
Within current budgets |
|
7. |
Review the current promotional campaigns to better positioned and market the LGA as a tourism destination. This will include video promotions that encapsulate the diverse offerings to help create a reason for people to come and explore
|
A strong well planned marketing campaign will assist us better target visitors and build awareness of what the LGA offers |
Within current budgets |
|
8. |
Development of a self-guided Inner West Distillery Trail to promote the sector and drive both domestic and international tourism markets into the LGA. |
Micro-breweries and distilleries are destination businesses, they attract out of area spend and tourism. Council supported the development of Ale Trail and local distilleries expressed a need for their own self-guided trail to build awareness of the sector which will have a flow on effect to other businesses. |
Within current budget |
|
Total |
|
|
$200,000 |
Support for events
Most recently the Marrickville Sunday Session in Calvert St carpark earlier this month included local brewers and distillers and promoted the Inner West Ale Trail, as well as short films from local creatives and local food offerings. Planning is also underway for festival next to Sydenham station in August 2025, which will also engage the breweries.
Market the sector
Development of a promotional campaign is underway to showcase the Inner West breweries and distilleries and drive visitation and spend into the LGA. The campaign is being developed by Council’s Communications team and included a series of fun videos with colourful breweries at their centre.
This promotion aligns into the new Metro and Marrickville that Council had accredited as a Purple Flag Zone, which recognises that the area meets standards of excellence in vibrancy, diversity and safety at night. This will be a positive marketing tool that will have a positive flow on effect to other businesses in these precincts.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report as all are within the draft budget for 2025/26.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Supporting the launch of Balmain Markets
Prepared By: Daniel East - Senior Manager Strategic Planning
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
3: Creative communities and a strong economy |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Council staff have meet with a representative from Balmain Markets Association to discuss what support can be provided to help promote the markets. This support takes the form of a 12-month rolling promotional campaign, covering the costs of new signage and fees to advertise in the Darling Magazine for the next 12 months to support the launch of Balmain Markets.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 18 February 2025, Council resolved the following:
1. Council note the significant work that the Balmain Markets Association has undertaken to re-establish a local market in Balmain including;
a) Securing a permanent location at St Andrew’s Congregational Church, Balmain
b) Successfully trialling a preliminary Christmas Market event at St Andrew’s Church on 7 December 2024
c) Petitioning for local community support
d) Creating a local community focussed business plan in partnership with the Balmain Rozelle Chamber of Commerce.
2. That Council notes the Balmain Markets Association projects regular weekend Balmain Markets to be in operation at St Andrew’s Congregational Church by late March 2025.
3. That Council officers meet with Trista Rose and Annette Plant from the Balmain Markets Association to discuss how Council can partner with and support the launch of the Balmain Markets and what resources might be available to assist with promotion and marketing and attracting quality vendors.
4. That Council report back to the March 2025 meeting advising the outcome of the discussion.
DISCUSSION
On 25 February 2025, Council staff from the Economic Development Team and Communications Team meet with a representative from Balmain Market Association to examine what support Council may be able to offer help promote the markets and attract suitable stall holders.
At the meeting staff were advised that there are plans in place to re-instate the Balmain Markets on a permanent bases operating once a month commencing in April 2025. The following assistance will be provided by Council officers:
· Produce and undertake a 12-month rolling promotional campaign for Balmain Markets which will be a powerful tool to reignite interest in the markets. This will include:
o social media posts
o Videos showcasing providores and interesting stall holders
· Balmain Markets will be listed on Council’s What’s on Page
· A one-off grant of $3,500 will be provided to the Balmain Chamber to undertake 12 month promotion in the Darling Magazine to help attract local stall holder and generate interest. The Chamber has previously assisted in promoting the special Christmas markets at Balmain. The promotional funding is being provided directly to the Chamber on behalf of the market organisers in order to meet governance criteria around grant funding.
· The Economic Development Team will work with representatives of the markets to arrange and cover the costs of new signage.
Balmain Markets were once the key market destination in Sydney offering a range of handmade arts and crafts, jewellery, giftware, trend-setting fashion, homewares and food. Markets are often an anchor tenant for a high street and have proven in the past to be successful at increasing out of area visitation and spend. Re-instatement of a regular market in Balmain will help strengthen the local economy by creating a ’destination story’ inviting people to visit and explore what the markets has to offer which is expected to provide a positive benefit to businesses in the high street.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report as they are contained within existing budgets.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Investment Report at 28 February 2025
Prepared By: Sajjad Ali - Acting Chief Financial Officer
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive, and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A monthly investment report is provided to Council detailing the investment portfolio in terms of performance, percentage exposure of the total portfolio, maturity date and changes in market value.
During the month of February 2025 there were no new investments or matured investments.
· Council is preparing for the maturity of further investments in March and April 2025, and rates are trending lower compared with prior months.
· Council’s entire investment portfolio remains invested, with 52% of the portfolio in Non-Fossil Fuel Lending authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs), 10% in Socially Responsible Investments, and 38% in Green investments.
Council’s investments are reported monthly to Council in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993, the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021 and Council’s Investment Policy.
BACKGROUND
A monthly investment report is provided to Council detailing the investment portfolio in terms of performance, percentage exposure of total portfolio, maturity date and changes in market value.
The intention of investing Council’s funds is to seek the most favourable return available, whilst having due consideration of risk and security for that investment type and ensuring that its liquidity requirements are being maintained; with consideration given to the preservation of capital, liquidity, and the return on investment.
Preservation of capital is the principal objective of the investment portfolio. Investments are placed in a manner that seeks to ensure security and safeguard the investment portfolio. This includes managing credit and interest rate risk within identified thresholds and parameters.
Council determined to proactively invest in a non-fossil fuel investment portfolio.
Legislative Requirements
All investments are to comply with the following:
§ Local Government Act 1993;
§ Local Government (General) Regulation 2021;
§ Ministerial Investment Order dated 17 February 2011;
§ Local Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting;
§ Australian Accounting Standards; and
§ Division of Local Government Investment Policy Guidelines May 2010
Council’s Socially Responsible Investments consist of Green Term Deposits/Floating Rate Notes from otherwise fossil fuel lending banks, such as CBA and Westpac and also long dated bond issues from a range of institutions and government agencies. These investments provide targeted funding to a wide range of green and socially responsible projects and initiatives. Council also utilises these investments to remain within the credit rating policy guidelines imposed by the NSW TCorp loan covenant requirements.
Certification
The Chief Financial Officer, Chris Sleiman, as the Responsible Accounting Officer has certified that the investments listed in the attached report have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, Section 212 of the Local Government General Regulation 2021, and Council’s Investment Policy.
DISCUSSION
Council’s investments are held in various investment categories which are listed in the table below. Council’s market value investment portfolio size is $202.0M, $0.3M higher than the prior month market value of $201.7M. All Socially Responsible Investments (SRI’s) are investments that comply with the Non-Fossil Fuel standards. Council’s portfolio during the month had a return of 4.99% pa, against the ‘AusBond Bank Bill Index’ Benchmark (4.51% pa) on a marked-to-market basis. For the past 12 months, the portfolio has returned 4.88% pa on a marked-to-market basis.
Risk markets experienced a downturn over February on the back of tariff uncertainty (led by the US) and ongoing geopolitics in the Middle East.
As interest rates rise/fall the dollar valuations of existing bonds rise/fall in the market. While Fixed Rate Bond’s (or Floating Rates Notes) market value may drop below its face value (or par value) during the life of a security, providing Council does not sell the security and the issuer is sound (which all of Council’s holdings are) then the bond’s market value will come back to the face value by the time it matures.
Changes in the value of our portfolio
There were no new investments or matured investments during February.
With additional rate cuts and a global economic downturn priced in over 2025, Council has been advised to consider diversifying and taking an ‘insurance policy’ against a potentially lower rate environment by investing across 1-5 year fixed deposits and locking in rates above 4½% p.a.
Council’s entire investment portfolio remains invested, with 53% of the portfolio in Non-Fossil Fuel lending authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs), 10% of the portfolio in Socially Responsible Investments, and 38% of the portfolio in Green investments.
Council has two Emerald Investments that were purchased by the former Marrickville Council in July 2006 with maturity dates of August 2051 and August 2056 representing a market value $1.1M of Councils invested funds.
The attachments to this report summarise all investments held by Council and interest returns for the period ending 28 February 2025.
The Current Market value is required to be accounted for. The Current Market Value is a likely outcome if Council were to consider recalling the investment prior to its due date.
All investments held in the month of February were in accordance with the Local Government Act, Local Government Regulations, and the Inner West Council Investment Policy.
External / Internal Restrictions & Working Funds
Council’s external restriction reserves are funds that are restricted for use by external entities and have a specific purpose. Examples of such reserves include:
· Developer Contributions
· Grants
· Domestic Waste Reserve
· Stormwater Levy.
Internal Restriction reserves are reserves created internally by Council for a specific purpose. Examples include:
· Employment Leave Entitlements
· Investment Property Reserve
· Infrastructure Renewal Reserve
· Depreciation Contra Reserve.
External / Internal Restrictions & Working Funds
Other Investment Information
The chart below shows the average Term Deposit bids available for Council over the next five years across banks from different credit ratings.
In the deposit market, over February, at the very short-end of the curve (less than 12 months), the average deposit rates offered by the major banks fell by around 15-20 basis points (bp) compared to where they were the previous month (January), in response to the RBA’s first rate cut this easing cycle. At the medium to longer-end of the curve (2-3 years), the average rates fell by around 5 bp compared to where they were in January (and largely unchanged for 4-5 years).
Domestic issues:
· The RBA cut rates by 25 bp to 4.10% as widely expected. The post-Meeting Statement stated that “some of the upside risks to inflation appear to have eased and there are signs that disinflation might be occurring a little more quickly than earlier expected”. However, risks were seen as two sided and the post-meeting commentary was seen as hawkish - if policy is “eased too much too soon, disinflation could stall, and inflation would settle above the midpoint”.
· The January Monthly CPI Indicator printed close to consensus at +2.5% y/y vs. +2.6% expected. The monthly core measures of inflation came in largely as expected at +2.8%-2.9% y/y.
· The RBA also lowered its projection of the unemployment rate by 0.3%, seeing unemployment peaking at 4.2% in June 2025 from a peak of 4.5% by December 2025. The seasonally adjusted unemployment rate rose by 0.1% to 4.1% in January. Employment rose +44k, following a bump of +56k a month prior.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
|
1.⇩ |
Inner West Council Investment Report - February 2025 |
|
2.⇩ |
Inner West Council Economic and Investment Portfolio Commentary - February 2025 |
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Investment Report at 31 March 2025
Prepared By: Sajjad Ali - Acting Chief Financial Officer
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive, and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A monthly investment report is provided to Council detailing the investment portfolio in terms of performance, percentage exposure of the total portfolio, maturity date and changes in market value. During the month of March 2025:
· Council new investments:
o $1.2M 3 Year Floating Rate Note with Beyond Bank at a current yield of 5.26%pa (purchased in the primary market) with margin of 115 basis points
o $4.0M 12 month Green Term Deposit with Westpac at fixed rate of 4.52%pa
o $2.0M 2 year Green Term Deposit with Westpac at fixed rate of 4.38%pa
o $3.5M 6 month Term Deposit with Bendigo and Adelaide Bank at fixed rate of 4.64%pa.
· Council matured investments:
o $6.75M 12 month Green Term Deposit with Westpac at fixed rate of 5.08%pa
o $4.0M 3 Year Floating Rate Note with Bendigo and Adelaide Bank at a current yield of 5.45%pa.
· Council is preparing for the maturity of further investments in April and May 2025, with the rates trending lower compared with prior months.
· Council’s entire investment portfolio remains invested, with 52% of the portfolio in Non-Fossil Fuel Lending authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs), 10% in Socially Responsible Investments, and 38% in Green investments.
Council’s investments are reported monthly to Council in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993, the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021 and Council’s Investment Policy.
BACKGROUND
A monthly investment report is provided to Council detailing the investment portfolio in terms of performance, percentage exposure of total portfolio, maturity date and changes in market value.
The intention of investing Council’s funds is to seek the most favourable return available, whilst having due consideration of risk and security for that investment type and ensuring that its liquidity requirements are being maintained; with consideration given to the preservation of capital, liquidity, and the return on investment.
Preservation of capital is the principal objective of the investment portfolio. Investments are placed in a manner that seeks to ensure security and safeguard the investment portfolio. This includes managing credit and interest rate risk within identified thresholds and parameters.
Council determined to proactively invest in a non-fossil fuel investment portfolio.
Legislative Requirements
All investments are to comply with the following:
§ Local Government Act 1993;
§ Local Government (General) Regulation 2021;
§ Ministerial Investment Order dated 17 February 2011;
§ Local Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting;
§ Australian Accounting Standards; and
§ Division of Local Government Investment Policy Guidelines May 2010.
Council’s Socially Responsible Investments consist of Green Term Deposits/Floating Rate Notes from otherwise fossil fuel lending banks, such as CBA and Westpac and also long dated bond issues from a range of institutions and government agencies. These investments provide targeted funding to a wide range of green and socially responsible projects and initiatives. Council also utilises these investments to remain within the credit rating policy guidelines imposed by the NSW TCorp loan covenant requirements.
Certification
The Acting Chief Financial Officer, Sajjad Ali, as the Responsible Accounting Officer has certified that the investments listed in the attached report have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, Section 212 of the Local Government General Regulation 2021, and Council’s Investment Policy.
DISCUSSION
Council’s investments are held in various investment categories which are listed in the table below. Council’s market value investment portfolio size is $201.9M, $0.1M lower than the prior month market value of $202.0M. All Socially Responsible Investments (SRI’s) are investments that comply with the Non-Fossil Fuel standards. Council’s portfolio during the month had a return of 4.89% pa, against the ‘AusBond Bank Bill Index’ Benchmark (4.16% pa) on a marked-to-market basis. For the past 12 months, the portfolio has returned 4.79% pa on a marked-to-market basis.
Financial markets (equities and bonds) were sold off in March due to concerns of escalating tariff wars, global growth prospects and inflation uncertainty.
As interest rates rise/fall the dollar valuations of existing bonds rise/fall in the market. While Fixed Rate Bond’s (or Floating Rates Notes) market value may drop below its face value (or par value) during the life of a security, providing Council does not sell the security and the issuer is sound (which all of Council’s holdings are) then the bond’s market value will come back to the face value by the time it matures.
Changes in the value of our portfolio
New investments were:
· $1.2M 3 Year Floating Rate Note with Beyond Bank at a current yield of 5.26%pa (purchased in the primary market) with margin of 115 basis points
· $4.0M 12 month Green Term Deposit with Westpac at fixed rate of 4.52%pa
· $2.0M 2 year Green Term Deposit with Westpac at fixed rate of 4.38%pa
· $3.5M 6 month Term Deposit with Bendigo and Adelaide Bank at fixed rate of 4.64%pa.
Matured investments were:
· $6.75M 12 month Green Term Deposit with Westpac at fixed rate of 5.08%pa
· $4.0M 3 Year Floating Rate Note with Bendigo and Adelaide Bank at a current yield of 5.45%pa.
With additional rate cuts and a global economic downturn priced in over 2025, investors should consider diversifying and taking an ‘insurance policy’ against a potentially lower rate environment by investing across 1-5 year fixed deposits and locking in rates above 4½% p.a.
Council’s entire investment portfolio remains invested, with 52% of the portfolio in Non-Fossil Fuel lending authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs), 10% of the portfolio in Socially Responsible Investments, and 38% of the portfolio in Green investments.
Council has two Emerald Investments that were purchased by the former Marrickville Council in July 2006 with maturity dates of August 2051 and August 2056 representing a market value $1.1M of Councils invested funds.
The attachments to this report summarise all investments held by Council and interest returns for the period ending 31 March 2025.
The Current Market value is required to be accounted for. The Current Market Value is a likely outcome if Council were to consider recalling the investment prior to its due date.
All investments held in the month of March were in accordance with the Local Government Act, Local Government Regulations, and the Inner West Council Investment Policy.
External / Internal Restrictions & Working Funds
Council’s external restriction reserves are funds that are restricted for use by external entities and have a specific purpose. Examples of such reserves include:
· Developer Contributions
· Grants
· Domestic Waste Reserve
· Stormwater Levy.
Internal Restriction reserves are reserves created internally by Council for a specific purpose. Examples include:
· Employment Leave Entitlements
· Investment Property Reserve
· Infrastructure Renewal Reserve
· Depreciation Contra Reserve.
External / Internal Restrictions & Working Funds
Other Investment Information
The chart below shows the average Term Deposit bids available for Council over the next five years across banks from different credit ratings.
In the deposit market, over March, at the very short-end of the curve (less than 6 months), the average deposit rates offered by the major banks remained relatively flat compared to where they were the previous month (February). At the longer-end of the curve (1-5 years), the average rates fell by another 10-15bp compared to where they were in February.
Domestic issues:
· The RBA Minutes for February did not contain any new information given the extensive commentary by RBA officials since then. The key observation and judgements the Board applied when deciding to cut rates were that inflation had come in lower than expected.
· The Monthly CPI indicator fell 0.1% to +2.4% from +2.5% (consensus 2.5%). The annual trimmed mean slipped 0.1% to +2.7% from +2.8%. The RBA in February perhaps remained a little too cautious in their inflation forecasts, and that inflation outcomes (thus far) can support a gradual easing cycle to sustain the pickup in growth to trend and support a labour market remaining near full employment.
· Headline employment fell -52.8k in February against expectations of a +30k rise. The unemployment rate was unchanged at 4.1%, though it did fall 0.056% in unrounded terms (consensus 4.1%). The market consensus is that given the RBA still views the labour market as “a little too tight”, it will take realised wages growth (WPI) and inflation (quarterly CPI) to make the case for further rate cuts.
· Financial markets continue to fully price in two rate cuts in 2025 and another one by early 2026, despite Governor Bullock’s jawboning against such expectations:
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
|
1.⇩ |
Inner West Council Economic and Investment Portfolio Commentary |
|
2.⇩ |
Inner West Council Investment Report |
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Celebrating the Vietnamese Community in Marrickville
Prepared By: Michael Daly - Creative Communities Manager
Authorised By: Ruth Callaghan - Director Community
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
3: Creative communities and a strong economy |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report provides details on how to work with the Marrickville community to expand the Lunar New Year celebrations for 2026.
In 2025, Council expanded the Ashfield Lunar New Year program to provide opportunities for a greater number of community and cultural groups to participate as part of the program and celebrate Lunar New Year.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 18 February 2025, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council note the success of the 2025 Lunar New Year events program in Ashfield and surrounds and congratulates the staff and community partners involved in delivering this program.
2. That Council consult with local Marrickville residents and business community to identify ways the Council can recognise and celebrate Vietnamese celebrations of Lunar New Year, including additional events.
3. That Council receive a report outlining options to create additional events celebrating Lunar New Year in 2027, including opportunities to activate ‘Little Vietnam’ and surrounds, as well as Marrickville Town Hall. The report should include potential costs and grant funding opportunities.
This follows on from previous resolutions where at the Council meeting held on 9 May 2023, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council consult with the local Chinese residents and business community to identify ways the Council can recognise and celebrate Chinese culture including through the built environment and place naming.
2. That Council consider recognising the local Chinese community and improving functionality for local events when redeveloping the Ashfield townhall square.
3. That Council receive a report outlining options to create a program of events celebrating Lunar New Year in 2025, including opportunities to activate local laneways and the Esplanade in Ashfield.
4. That Council recognise that Lunar New Year is also celebrated by other South East Asian Communities including the Vietnamese and Korean community. This should be considered when designing any future Lunar New Year program of events.
5. That the report may include prospective costs and grant funding opportunities.
6. That Council investigate the feasibility of amending council’s current event budget and program to include an additional Lunar New Year event in 2024 in Ashfield. This should be reported to councillors either by briefing note or by a report to Council.
At the Council meeting held on 12 September 2023, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council undertake additional Lunar New Year activities in 2024 as outlined in this report.
2. That Council support Lunar New Year activities in Ashfield and consider activations in the Council Courtyard, Hercules St and the Laneways around Ashfield and add ASHBIZ to the organisations consulted.
DISCUSSION
In 2025, Council delivered an expanded Lunar New Year (LNY) program through an Expression of Interest program for delivery of events and activities in Ashfield by community members and organisations. The EOI was translated into Mandarin, Korean and Vietnamese. Council received 23 applications from community groups and supported eight projects at a total value of $30,000 through the funding round. This included a local Vietnamese drumming group as part of the 2025 program. Lunar New Year celebrations activated Ashfield Town Hall, Ashfield Forecourt, Ashfield Civic Centre and activity rooms, and roving performances through Liverpool Rd, Ashfield Mall and Hercules St.
Events were advertised together with existing programming from Libraries to support 12 community led events in Ashfield, which attracted over 3,000 attendees, including a total of 473 participating performers and creatives. The EOI model for the LNY was highly successful in connecting with the local communities that celebrate and supported Chinese, Vietnamese, and Indonesian LNY traditions.
PROPOSAL
Council proposes to expand the EOI model to incorporate delivery in both the Ashfield and Marrickville areas, which will include encouraging local Vietnamese organisations from Marrickville to apply to participate. The EOI model allows Council to reach out to residents and business communities to identify ways through the community, that we can recognise and celebrate LNY celebrations including Vietnamese celebrations in Marrickville.
Following the success of the 2025 Lunar New Year program, Council would seek applications from artists, community groups and organisations to deliver events celebrating Lunar New Year, the Year of the Horse (2026) for both Ashfield and Marrickville.
Through this program, Council staff will facilitate a venue-matching program for Council-owned venues (subject to availability) for community event organisers, including opportunities to activate Marrickville Town Hall. Applications will also be accepted for non-Council venues, including “Little Vietnam” and surrounds.
The successful applicants will be required to work closely with Council to deliver on all required outcomes for the program and would enter into an agreement with Council to define deliverables and timelines.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report, as it can be delivered within current budget.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Murrell Street, Ashfield - Traffic Study
Prepared By: Jason Scoufis - Acting Traffic and Transport Planning Manager
Authorised By: Manod Wickramasinghe - Acting Director Engineering
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Council resolved to receive a report regarding the implementation status of previously supported traffic and parking changes on Murrell Street, Ashfield as well as the proposed scope and timeframe for a comprehensive traffic study to be undertaken in the street.
It is noted that actions from the July 2022 Traffic Committee in relation to Murrell Street have been actioned which the final ‘No Right Turn’ signage to be installed in May.
The traffic study of Murrell Street has commenced and is expected to be completed in August 2025 with detail design scheduled to commence immediately following this.
BACKGROUND
Murrell Street is a two-way street that connects from Liverpool Road into a short section of Orchard Crescent which leads to a dead end some 40 metres west of Murrell Street. Murrell Street measures approximately 9.0 metres from kerb to kerb with parking to both sides of the street. It only serves resident access and school drop off and pick up together with 15-minute short term parking for the Ashfield Primary Public School and an adjoining Child Care Centre on the eastern side of Murrell Street.
A mini roundabout to the end of Murrell Street allows vehicles to turn around to drop off and pick up children to the eastern side of the street. The parking to the eastern side is a mixture of ‘No Parking’ and Mobility Parking during school hours, and 15- minute parking to cater for both the needs of the school and Child Care Centre over an extended time period for drop and pick up.
The western kerb side accommodates about 11 parking spaces with driveways to unit complexes in between and David’s Lane off Murrell Street serving rear shop/unit access. The parking is restricted to read ‘2P 8.00am-6.00pm Mon-Fri., Permit Holders Excepted Area 1’
The street is covered under a 40 km/hour school zone limit.
Figure 1- Locality Plan
At the Council meeting held on 11 March 2025, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council note the complex nature of Murrell Street, Ashfield as a high traffic drop off / pick up zone that is shared between Ashfield Public school, Good-start Early Learning Child Care Centre and residents in high density housing.
2. That Council note the traffic and parking changes on Murrell Street, Ashfield that were approved by the Local Traffic Committee on 18 July 2022, including:
a) installation of ‘No Stopping 8:30am-9:30am, 2:30pm-3:30pm School days’ and ‘2P 9:30am-2:30pm, 3:30pm-6:00pm Mon-Fri Permit Holders Excepted AREA 1’ signage on the western side of Murrell Street outside 183 Liverpool Road;
b) installation of 'No Stopping' signage across specified driveways; and
c) the outcome of correspondence with Transport for NSW regarding the proposed 'No Right Turn 8:00am-9:30am, 2:30pm-4:00pm School Days' restriction for traffic exiting Murrell Street onto Liverpool Road.
3. That Council note ongoing concerns and advocacy from parents, the Ashfield Public School, and Good Start Early Learning Child Care centre communities that traffic safety issues on Murrell Street have not improved despite the measures approved in July 2022.
4. That Council add Murrell Street to the increased surveillance schedule for Council Rangers, particularly during school zone hours (8:00am-9:30am and 2:30pm-4:00pm on school days), to ensure compliance with parking restrictions and improve overall safety.
5. That Council conduct a comprehensive traffic study of Murrell Street, Ashfield, and surrounding areas with particular focus on:
a) Traffic flow during school drop-off and pick-up times;
b) Pedestrian safety, particularly for school children;
c) Vehicle speeds and driver behaviour including U-turns in the street;
d) Current parking arrangements and compliance;
e) Access issues for local residents and businesses;
f) The ways Orchard Crescent impacts traffic flow, and
g) Alternative traffic management solutions.
6. That Council request that the traffic study include direct consultation with Ashfield Public School, Good Start Early Learning Child Care Centre, local residents, and businesses, cycling and active transport groups, and include including feedback received by council to date on this issue.
7. That Council receive a report on the implementation status of the traffic and parking changes from July 2022 and the proposed scope and timeframe for a comprehensive traffic study, at the April 2025 Council meeting.
DISCUSSION
Outcomes of July 2022 Traffic Committee
Regarding the proposed improvements approved at the July 2022 Local Traffic Committee, the
‘No Stopping 8:30am-9:30am, 2:30pm-3:30pm School days’ and ‘2P 9:30am-2:30pm, 3:30pm-6:00pm Mon-Fri Permit Holders Excepted AREA 1’ signage on the western side of Murrell Street outside 183 Liverpool Road has been implemented as has the installation of 'No Stopping' signage across specified driveways.
Regarding the 'No Right Turn 8:00am-9:30am, 2:30pm-4:00pm School Days' restriction for traffic exiting Murrell Street onto Liverpool Road, the Traffic Management Plan (TMP) has been approved by TfNSW and the signposting is scheduled to be installed during the May 2025 school holidays ready for Term 2.
Traffic Study - Initial Engagement
An on-site meeting was held in Murrell Street, Ashfield outside Ashfield Public School at 2:30pm on Friday 4 April 2025 where observations were made during school pick up and discussions held regarding pedestrian safety. The meeting was attended by Council officers, Ashfield Public School Principal and a member of the P&C Association.
The main issues raised are as follows.
· There is a desire line where pedestrians cross Murrell Street from the school gate kerb ramp diagonally to the opposite driveway heading south to Liverpool Road.
· Traffic congestion in Murrell Street at drop-off/pick-up times.
· Vehicles double park & perform dangerous 3-point turns and reverse into resident driveways to avoid queuing in the car line.
· Footpath is too narrow for parents walking students for drop-off/pick-up in particular parents walking with prams.
· The ‘No Through Road’ sign (previously attached to the ‘No Right Turn’ on Liverpool Road at Murrell Street is missing & requires reinstatement.
· It was identified that speed is not an issue in Murrell Street however traffic volume & parking/queuing for pick-up creates congestion & safety issues.
· Excursion buses are not permitted to layover on Liverpool Road outside the school entrance. Concerns were raised that students must cross busy Liverpool Road to board excursion buses parked in Queen Street.
· Tradies and delivery trucks park on roundabout section of Murrell Street when unable to find legal parking.
· Ashfield Public School is used by the community on Saturdays.
· Concerns with existing 60 km/h speed limit outside of school zone hours and its impact on road safety.
· Requesting additional pedestrian fencing on the northern side of Liverpool Road between the eastern and western legs of the signalised pedestrian crossing facilities.
· Potential for modifying the parking signposting on the northern side of Liverpool Road between Murrell Street and Brown Street to cater for PM pick up for the school and reduce the number of vehicles that would access Murrell Street.
Traffic Study – Scope and Timeframe
In order to undertake a comprehensive traffic study of the issues detailed above, the next steps are detailed below:
· Data collection including mid-point speed and volume traffic counts and pedestrian counts.
· Analysis of 5-year crash history
· Analysis of engagement outcomes from the Ashfield North/Croydon LATM study which is currently underway and analysis of outcomes from the on-site meeting with school representatives.
· Review of options to improve pedestrian safety and amenity
· Preparation of concept plans of preferred option(s)
· Review of existing parking arrangements including drop-off/pick-up
· Further consultation with the community.
The outcome of the analysis will be reported to a future Local Traffic Committee for endorsement. It is expected that the study will be reported to the Traffic Committee in August 2025.
Detailed design of the final option has been scheduled for the 2025/26 financial year.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The costs of the traffic study will be funded from existing operational budgets.
An application will be made for State and/or Federal grant funding of the final proposed treatments where possible or funded from Council’s Capital Works budget.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Railway Avenue, Stanmore - Review of Traffic Accidents Adjacent to the Railway Avenue Cycleway
Prepared By: Jason Scoufis - Acting Traffic and Transport Planning Manager
Authorised By: Manod Wickramasinghe - Acting Director Engineering
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Council at its meeting held on 11 March 2025 resolved to receive an analysis report of traffic safety issues along Railway Avenue, Stanmore following the installation of speed cushions in Railway Avenue as part of a cycleway project.
This report describes the traffic crashes that have occurred on Railway Avenue, Stanmore since the installation of traffic calming cushions and notes that none were determined to be a direct consequence of the layout and design of the traffic calming speed cushions.
BACKGROUND
Council at the Council meeting held on 11 March 2025, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council prepare an analysis report of traffic incidences that have occurred on Railway Avenue Stanmore since the installation of the traffic calming cushions.
2. That Council include in the report details of how many of the traffic incidences were determined to be a direct consequence of the layout/design of the traffic calming cushions.
3. That Council present the report for consideration at the April 2025 Council meeting
DISCUSSION
Railway Avenue from Liberty Street to Stanmore Reserve provides a separated two-lane bicycle path along the southern side of Railway Avenue along with parking on both sides of the roadway.
Parking along both sides of Railway Avenue is maintained by narrowing the traffic lanes to 5.8m (two-way) and providing edge line markings for 2.1m wide parking lanes. Along the southern side, individual parking bays are marked, and the median divider consists of regularly spaced kerb blocks located towards the front and rear of each parking space.
There are six sets of speed cushions that have been installed as part of the RR7 Cycleway Project at Railway Avenue between Douglas Street and Kingston Lane and can be seen in Figures 1,2 and 3 below. These locations are:
· Speed cushions opposite numbers 104 & 102 Railway Avenue (west of Surrey Street)
· Speed cushions opposite number 70 Railway Avenue (east of Warwick Street)
· Speed cushions opposite number 42 Railway Avenue (east of Lincoln Street)
· Speed cushions opposite numbers 24 & 22 Railway Avenue (east of Stafford Street)
· Speed cushions opposite number 4 Railway Avenue (east of Cardigan Street)
· Speed cushion opposite number 1 & 1A Railway Avenue (west of Kingston Road)
Speed cushion locations at Railway Avenue
Figure 1. Speed cushions in Railway Avenue (between Liberty Street and Stafford Street)
Figure 2. Speed cushions in Railway Avenue (between Stafford Street and Durham Street)
Figure 3. Speed cushions in Railway Avenue (between Warwick Street and Douglas Street)
Crash History
Since the construction of the cycleway, there have been three traffic crashes along Railway Avenue officially recorded with the Transport for NSW traffic crash database. The locations of the recorded traffic crashes can be seen on the following map.
Figure 4. Recorded crash accidents at Railway Avenue between 2020 – 2024.
|
· At Kingston Road – 1 crash (cross traffic in 2021) |
|||
|
Crash ID |
Year |
RUM Code |
Diagram |
|
1262280 |
2021 |
10 (Cross Traffic) |
|
|
· At Warwick Street – 1 crash (right near in 2022) |
|||
|
Crash ID |
Year |
RUM Code |
Diagram |
|
1295274 |
2022 |
13 (Right Near) |
|
|
· At Surrey Street – 1 crash (lane change right in 2021) |
|||
|
Crash ID |
Year |
RUM Code |
Diagram |
|
1285858 |
2021 |
34 (Lane Change Right – Not Overtaking) |
|
Of the 3 crashes that were recorded in this time period, crashes at Warwick Street and Kingston Road were within proximity of a speed cushion. By analysing the Road User Movement (RUM) Code and description of the abovementioned crashes, it is noted that neither crash was associated with swerving which requires a RUM code of 34 (lane change right – not overtaking), 35 (lane change left), 52 (pulling out). While the crash at Surrey Street recorded a RUM code of 34, the traffic accident location was not within proximity of a speed cushion. Please note that RUM Code refers to the Road User Movement code which describes the type of crash.
When a vehicle is parked adjacent to the speed cushions in the parking lane, it is not possible to swerve into the parking lane to avoid the cushion. Parking is permitted adjacent to the speed cushions with the exception of the speed cushion opposite number 70 Railway Avenue, where parking is not permitted next to the speed cushion due to the presence of a driveway for Sydney Trains to perform necessary rail maintenance works.
Notwithstanding, multiple site inspections by Council’s traffic engineers indicate that the on-street parking spaces are typically occupied by Stanmore Station commuters on Railway Avenue between Douglas Street and Durham Street.
Following the construction of the RR7 Cycleway between Lewisham to Newtown, Inner West Council had contacted Transport & Urban Planning Pty Ltd to undertake a post cycleway construction road safety audit dated on 27 August 2021. The road safety audit report (Attachment 1) by Transport and Urban Planning Pty Ltd did not identify the constructed speed cushions as an area of concern for possible vehicle swerving.
Conclusion
Railway Avenue since the construction of the RR7 Cycleway from Lewisham to Newtown in 2021 has had three traffic accidents officially recorded with Transport for NSW between 2020 – 2024. These accidents have no correlation to resident reports of vehicles undertaking a swerving maneuver to avoid constructed speed cushions. Therefore Council’s Traffic and Transport Planning team will continue to monitor Railway Avenue, Stanmore for swerving related incidents. Any further improvements can be assessed as part of the Petersham Stanmore Camperdown Enmore LATM Study currently underway.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
|
1.⇩ |
Railway Avenue, Stanmore - Road Safety Audit |
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Bins and Cleaner Streets
Prepared By: Erin White - Manager Resource Recovery and Fleet Services and Lachlan Broadbent - Senior Manager Operations
Authorised By: Manod Wickramasinghe - Acting Director Engineering
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership 2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Council previously resolved that a report be provided with a view to increase the available number of bins and servicing of bins on local streets and in parks; increase the service levels for high pressure cleaning in town centres; and establish a “Street Blitz team” to focus maintenance and cleaning of main streets.
The service levels and number of bins on local streets and in parks is currently being assessed as part of an audit of street litter bins and the development of a Litter Prevention Roadmap. The audit will inform changes to placement of bins and the collection frequency and will be completed by the end of the financial year. The Litter Prevention Roadmap will inform any increase in number of bins in local streets and parks and will be reported to Council in August 2025.
To increase the high pressure cleaning of main streets, it is proposed to bring existing weed management services in-house by expanding the scope of main street high-pressure cleaning to include hot water weed management services. This will double main street cleaning frequency and allow council to have greater control over sensitive area management and respond promptly to community requests, enhancing the aesthetics and usability of main street assets.
Furthermore, a trial “Street Blitz” is proposed for Balmain which will include tree replanting, pruning, signage updates, and deep cleaning of footpaths. Pending the outcomes of this trial, a mainstreet Blitz schedule will be developed.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 11 March 2025, Council resolved the following:
That Council endorse the phased trial of FOGO and Recycling in Parks, commencing with Phase 1 at Enmore Park and Pioneers Park Leichhardt.
That Council include the following parks in phase 2 should it proceed:
a) Petersham Park, Petersham (Stanmore-Damun Ward);
b) Gladstone Park (Balmain-Baludarri Ward);
c) Darryl Jackson Gardens, Summer Hill (Ashfield-Djarrawunang Ward);
d) Enmore Park, Enmore (Marrickville-Midjuburi Ward - continuing from phase 1);
e) and
f) Pioneers Park, Leichhardt (Leichhardt-Gulgadya Ward - continuing from phase 1).
That as part of the trial, Council monitor and if necessary increase service levels.
That Council commit the required funding for the trial which is detailed in the funding implications of this report in the draft 2025/26 budget.
That Council provide a further report to the April 2025 Council meeting with a proposal to:
a) increase the number of bins on local streets and in parks and the service levels for bins;
b) increase the service levels for high pressure cleaning in town centres; and
c) establish a “Street Blitz team” to focus maintenance and cleaning of main streets similar to that offered by Randwick City Council.
That Council commit to one mobile customer service stall in each of the Phase 1 trial parks prior to the commencement of the trial, and, in the event Phase 1 is successful, additional mobile customer service stalls in each of the Phase 2 parks prior to extension of the trial.
DISCUSSION
Litter Bin Collection
In recent months, Council has conducted both internal and external stakeholder engagement to inform the development of the Litter Prevention Roadmap. This roadmap, is in part designed to guide strategic decisions around the placement of litter bins and the frequency of servicing, ensuring that resources are targeted effectively in response to community needs and usage patterns.
Key findings from the engagement process indicate that Marrickville recorded the highest number of community-reported litter hotspots across the Local Government Area (LGA), with a total of 73 locations identified. Ashfield and Tempe were also frequently mentioned. In particular, retail and hospitality precincts in Marrickville and Tempe were highlighted as litter hotspots by the community. This aligns with internal data which identified town centres and retail zones as the most litter-prone land use types.
Further community feedback included direct contact from eight residents who identified specific locations such as bus stops, parks, and train stations as common litter hotspots. Notable parks mentioned for higher litter volumes include Tempe Reserve, Kendrick Park, and Crammond Park.
Council Coordinators currently perform weekday quality checks on a random selection of street and park litter bins to ensure services are being delivered effectively. Where increased demand is identified, additional servicing is implemented. Any proposed increase in park bin infrastructure is discussed with the Resource Recovery Services team in consultation with the Parks Team to ensure a coordinated approach.
Importantly, the need to provide adequate waste infrastructure in parks and on main streets must be carefully balanced with the risk of encouraging illegal dumping of household or commercial waste.
The Litter Prevention Roadmap is expected to be reported to Council in August 2025.
To further inform service planning, Council is undertaking an audit of street litter bins to assess fill levels. The audit is currently underway and will be completed within the 2024/25 financial year. This data will be used to guide decisions about collection frequency and identify potential areas requiring re-allocation of bins.
High Pressure Cleaning
Since the establishment of the current high-pressure cleaning service in 2021, the demand for more frequent and thorough cleaning in town centres has risen.
Currently, Council provides main street high-pressure cleaning services every three months, supplemented by a fortnightly hotspot cleaning initiative targeting high-priority areas. This service is undertaken by a high pressure cleaning team comprising of two staff members and a purpose-built truck.
To increase the level of service offered, it is recommended to establish an additional high-pressure cleaning team. This team would consist of two new staff members and a second purpose-built truck, allowing for the service to be organised into north and south programs.
The proposed changes would increase the cleaning frequency from quarterly to every six weeks and boost hotspot cleaning from fortnightly to weekly.
This additional high-pressure cleaning team can be resourced by transitioning contracted weed-management services to an in-house service and having the service performed by the high-pressure cleaning teams.
It should be noted that the specialist truck now used for high pressure cleaning is capable of hot water weed management which conforms to the Inner West Weed Management Policy.
The introduction of an additional crew will not only increase the frequency of cleaning and responsiveness to community requests, but will also allow Council to maintain better oversight of sensitive areas where weed control is critical.
Moreover, increased service frequency will enhance the overall presentation of main streets, enhancing public spaces and supporting local businesses.
Street Blitz Team
The "Street Blitz Team” concept is inspired by the operational success witnessed in Randwick City. Their one-day intensive cleaning and maintenance program mobilised over 50 staff across various departments, resulting in remarkable transformations within the town centre. The approach not only facilitated immediate improvements but also served to engage local businesses through communication and collaboration.
For the Inner West Council, the proposed blitz will encompass:
· Street tree and ornamental garden replanting
· Street tree pruning
· Mulching and weeding of all garden beds
· Replacement of all street and traffic signs, including new street name signs featuring the Inner West logo
· Maintenance and painting of street furniture
· Replacement of maintenance pit lids
· Deep scrubbing and high-pressure cleaning of footpath areas
· Graffiti removal
· Hand cleaning of furniture and removal of posters
The value of this initiative lies in its ability to deliver significant improvements in a short timeframe.
It is proposed to trial a Street Blitz in the Balmain main street in June 2025, with careful planning required to minimise disruption to regular business operations. Pending the outcome of this trial, a Street Blitz schedule will be developed for key main streets across the Inner West LGA.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
To be funded from existing operational budgets.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Flooding in the area of Northcote Street, Marrickville
Prepared By: David Paton - Engineering Services Manager
Authorised By: Manod Wickramasinghe - Acting Director Engineering
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note this report.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
1: An ecologically sustainable Inner West |
|
2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport |
|
4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Residents have experienced flooding in Northcote Street and Malakoff Street on several occasions since February 2022, affecting several properties and flooding vehicles parked in the street.
Following initial consultation with residents in 2022, stormwater upgrade works were planned and completed in November 2024 at a cost of approximately $180,000 to increase drainage capacity in Northcote Street, which has improved the capture of stormwater within the street and reduced the length of time that flood waters remain in the street.
Further works within Carew Lane and Malakoff Street are included in the draft FY26 budget in the amount of $240,000.
Despite the completed works having improved the drainage system in Northcote Street, the capacity of the stormwater channel running between Northcote Street and Malakoff Street remains a constraint on the system and impacts on the effectiveness of the above works.
The Marrickville Valley Flood Risk Management Plan includes a proposal to divert and upgrade the existing stormwater pipelines within Jarvie Park and Petersham Road to further reduce flood risk in Northcote Street at an estimated cost of $800,000.
Funding has been included in the draft FY26 budget for feasibility assessment of a more targeted pipeline diversion within Jarvie Park, which could be delivered at a lower cost. The results of this investigation would be presented to Council ahead of budget considerations for FY27 and beyond.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 18 February 2025, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council note the ongoing flooding of streets in Northcote and surrounding streets.
2. That Council
acknowledges the work undertaken by Inner West Council to increase the intake
capacity of stormwater on Northcote Street in the 2024-2025 Budget.
3. That Council request officers list flooding at this location for discussion at the next Flood Management Advisory Committee, including the extent of flooding, mitigations currently in place, and future options to mitigate and manage flooding at the location.
4. That Council request officers report to
the April council meeting with information and future options to mitigate and
manage flooding at this location.
5. That Council write to Sydney Water requesting a meeting to discuss options to improve the capacity and effectiveness of the water channel that runs through the area.
Council Engineers have been consulting with the residents of Northcote Street and Malakoff Street since flooding impacted several properties and flooding parked vehicles in the street in February 2022. Drainage upgrade works were completed in Northcote Street in November 2024, improving the capture of stormwater and reducing the length of time that flood water remains in the street.
However, the stormwater channel that runs between Northcote Street and Malakoff Street, runs full in significant storms and impacts on the effectiveness of the recently completed works.
Council staff met with representatives from Sydney Water in March this year to discuss the concerns of local residents, along with flood mitigation options.
Flooding in the Northcote Street area will be listed for discussion at the May 2025 Flood Management Advisory Committee meeting.
DISCUSSION
History of Flooding at this Location
Inner West Council is a highly urbanised Council, with much of the area subdivided and developed prior to current awareness and understanding of long-term rainfall patterns and intensity. Many residential areas have been built either immediately adjacent to or across major creek lines which were channelised in the early 1900s.
This has resulted in many areas across the Local Government Area that have ongoing exposure to latent flood risk to varying degrees.
Specifically, Northcote Street is situated within a local low point of a major tributary to Cooks River and what was, prior to the industrialisation of Marrickville, the Gumbramorra Swamp. The catchment draining to this location is in the order of 140 hectares and extends to New Canterbury Road. In the 1960s the Department of Public Works constructed a 1.9km underground channel which intercepted the open channel just upstream of Malakoff Street and diverted stormwater directly to Cooks River at Thornley Street, rather than via the Western Channel in Carrington Road.
In February 2022, Inner West Council experienced significant flooding across areas of Marrickville and was one of 61 Councils included in the Declared Natural Disaster AGRN 1012 - NSW Severe Weather and Flooding: 22 February 2022 onwards.
Council responded to almost 700 requests directly associated with this event. Council Engineers responded directly to the affected residents and developed a number of potential projects to reduce the impact of flooding to the affected areas. Many current projects within Council’s Delivery Program for Stormwater Renewal & Upgrades have been developed in response to this and other smaller but significant events that impacted Ashfield in 2024 and Camperdown earlier this year.
Current and Future Mitigation Options
Following the flooding in February 2022, Council developed plans to improve the capacity of the existing pits and pipelines directly draining Northcote Street and Malakoff Street. This was split into three projects with design and delivery to be staged between 2023 and 2026.
1. Pipe replacement and inlet upgrades in Northcote Street – Designed FY24 and delivered November 2024
2. Pipe renewal and new pits in Carew Lane – To be delivered FY26
3. Inlet Upgrades in Malakoff Street – New pits connecting directly to Sydney Water infrastructure in Malakoff Street. Designed by Council and approved by Sydney Water for construction in FY26.
The Marrickville Valley Flood Risk Management Study and Plan was adopted by Council in 2018. Council has been progressively investigating the feasibility of the options proposed in the Plan, including high priority items between Despointes Street and Silver Street, Illawarra Road and Shepherd Street, as well as within Railway Parade Marrickville.
The Flood Risk Management Plan includes an option within Jarvie Park as a medium priority item (Item FM3.1). The project would upgrade pipelines in Petersham Road and intercept existing stormwater pipelines from Cecilia Street and Depot Lane within Jarvie Park to drain directly to the Malakoff Street underground channel downstream of Northcote Street. It is anticipated that this would divert 23 hectares (approximately 15% of the total catchment) away from Northcote Street and reduce flood levels of up to 100mm in the 1% AEP flood event.
Council has been prioritising the development of High Priority options across the Local Government Area. Consequently, this option does not currently form part of Council’s Long Term Financial Plan or Delivery Program. The total estimated cost of this option is roughly $800,000, which would impact on the delivery of flood mitigation works elsewhere in the Inner West Council area.
However, an initial investigation and feasibility study for this option could be brought forward to be undertaken as part of the FY26 Operational Plan to review the scope of works and develop a more targeted measure that could potentially be delivered at a lower cost.
Formal approval by Sydney Water will be required for any connections to their stormwater infrastructure in Malakoff Street.
The Sydney Water representatives supported the proposal in principle and are committed to working with Council and the community to support measures to improve flooding in the area.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The renewal of the pipeline in Carew Lane and upgrade of stormwater inlets in Malakoff Street are included in the draft budget for FY26 in the amount of $100,000 and $140,000 respectively.
An amount of $60,000 has been included in the draft budget for FY26 for the feasibility assessment and detailed design of the Jarvie Park stormwater diversion works. An application for funding is being made through the NSW Flood Recovery and Resilience Grant Program to support this work.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Installation of Lockers at the Dawn Fraser Baths
Prepared By: Simon Duck - Senior Manager Aquatics
Authorised By: Ruth Callaghan - Director Community
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Dawn Fraser Baths located in the Harbour adjacent to Elkington Park is a well-attended swimming and recreation location with an annual attendance of over 40,000 each year. The facility provides programs such as competition water polo and training, public swimming, winter swimming access, lap swimming and general recreation.
The Inner West Council resolved at the Council meeting on February 18, 2025, to consider the cost of providing lockers for patrons who use the amenity noting there are no current lockers available at the baths. In addition, it was resolved to consider improvements to the food and beverage amenity at the DFB and to identify opportunities to expand special events and functions.
The information below notes that the installation of lockers will be undertaken at a cost of approximately $9,000 within existing budget. An overview of opportunities for improved F&B services and special events to be held at the baths is also provided.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 18 February 2025, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council note the success of the $8 million heritage restoration to the Dawn Fraser Baths.
2. That Council prepare a report detailing costings, recommended location and numbers of lockers that could be established at the Baths, to be tabled at the April 2025 Council Meeting.
3. That Council review the food and beverage offerings at the Dawn Fraser Baths and investigate opportunities for improvement with a view to establishing a new offering for the public in time for the 2025/26 Summer Season. This should include examination of all options including the use of a coffee cart or temporary takeaway facility during the summer season.
4. That Council identify how more community and private events such as film screenings, weddings and celebratory events can be held at the Baths. Options for how to facilitate and promote this are to be tabled in the report to the April Council meeting.
DISCUSSION
Lockers
Dawn Fraser is a marine environment and in relation to the installation of lockers it is proposed that these be constructed from a durable non timber material which will not suffer damage as a result of moisture or variable weather.
There is a suitable location available inside the facility which will allow convenient access by patrons and will be close to reception - allowing staff support and issuing keys to patrons using the lockers.
Lockers made up of a combination of bag sized and small lockers that can provide storage for wallets and phones can be installed and initial investigations demonstrate that 28 lockers with a combination of sizes can fit.
Kiosk services
In relation to kiosk and café enhancements at the DFB, progress has been made in the 2024/2025 season including the purchase of additional chairs, tables and ambient lighting to the pavilion area, with a view to making further improvements in the 2025/2026 season and beyond.
Investigations are currently underway for the procurement of additional food storage, display fridge and shelving to accommodate increased food offerings. Limitations that exist at the DFB regarding the provision of food and beverage include space within storerooms, cold storage, service areas and access for delivery by suppliers. A review of current vendor partnerships to supply a range of foods including sandwiches, salads, sushi and pastries is also underway to improve the food and beverage offering commencing from the 2025/2026 season.
Special Events
Staff are currently considering such activities as pop up movie nights and background music on the weekends that will not impact residents.
Opportunities also exist to host BBQ / sausage sizzle on the deck with events such as twilight BBQ / breakfast BBQ to attract young families. This can be timetabled in addition to current open days and other uses such as water polo tournaments.
The Inner West Council has also recently confirmed with Transport for NSW terms of use for additional special events which attract certain conditions. These conditions include safety controls such as no use of glass, no impact on community access for the facility and appropriate times for special events to ensure usage by the community is not impacted. In addition, the terms of use specify events should be designed for cost recovery for the amenity as opposed to commercially driven services or events.
Given the requirement to avoid impact on community usage, private events can be facilitated out of summer season times with the potential for some use during weekdays.
Development of a promotion plan has commenced to highlight the new offerings. This plan includes use of the Council website, social media updates and posts, member and customer information, and via affiliated users groups such as Water Polo and Swimming Clubs and Council databases.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Initial quotes for the purchase and installation of 28 lockers is approximately $9,000. This can be accommodated within the budget for general operating costs for the Dawn Fraser Baths.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Mandatory Reporting to Council of Report received from Fire & Rescue NSW - 425 Liverpool Road Ashfield
Prepared By: Michael Ryan - Senior Manager, Health & Building
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Correspondence was received from Fire & Rescue NSW (Attachment 1) identified fire safety matters in relation to 425 Liverpool Road Ashfield. The building comprises of residential apartments, retail, office and basement. Following an inspection of the premises by Council’s Senior Fire Safety Officer, it was determined that a Notice of Intention to serve a Development Control Order was warranted.
This will require either the installation or modification to the existing fire safety measures in the building to ensure adequate provision for fire safety and awareness. These works are able to be undertaken in accordance with State Planning provisions through the issuing of a Development Control Order under the EPAA.
BACKGROUND
425 Liverpool Road Ashfield
Fire and Rescue NSW (FRNSW) advised Inner West Council on 17 December 2024 of an inspection they undertook in response to a complaint regarding concerns with the adequacy of the provision for the fire safety at the premises, including:
· Concerns regarding multiple faults/isolations displayed on the Fire Brigade Panel (FBP).
· The fuel gauge associated with the diesel pump set appeared to be faulty.
· Roofing and walls had been installed to some of the storage cages located in the basement carpark levels which may cause interference to the discharge pattern of the sprinklers.
· Concerns regarding the maintenance of some of the Fire Doors located throughout the premises
· A current copy of the Annual Fire Safety Statement (AFSS) for the building was not displayed in a prominent location.
DISCUSSION
In accordance with the provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPAA), FRNSW referred the matter to Council for follow up. In response, Council’s Fire Safety Team conducted an inspection of the premises as per below table:
Inspection Result
An inspection was conducted on 31 January 2025 which revealed:
· The Fire Brigade Panel (FBP) faults had been repaired, it was no longer displaying the ‘Isolation’ faults and appeared to be functioning in accordance with Performance Standards, however the service logbooks were not located on site and certification of the servicing and maintenance of the panel is required to be submitted to Council
· The fuel gauge associated with the diesel pump set appeared to have been replaced however the service logbooks were not located on site and certification of the servicing and maintenance of the panel is required to be submitted to Council
· Multiple Fire Doors were observed failing to return to the fully closed position and self-latch after opening.
· The AFSS had been displayed in the building’s foyer since the inspection and report from FRNSW
· Multiple issues were noted with regards to the referenced Fire Engineering Report (FER) Report No. F1309 FER Rev 04, dated 20 March 2017
Direction: (EPA/2025/0016)
A fire Safety Notice of Intention to serve a Development Control Order was issued on 19 February 2025, requiring certain works to be undertaken in keeping with the comments from FRNSW in their letter dated 13 December 2025 as well as the findings from Council’s inspection
This matter will be followed up until the matters are resolved.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
|
1.⇩ |
Fire & Rescue Referal - 425 Liverpool Road Ashfield |
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: National General Assembly of Local Government 2025
From: Councillor Ismet Tastan
|
MOTION
That Councillor Tastan be added to the list of Councillor delegates to attend the National General Assembly of Local Government 2025.
|
Background
Council at its meeting on 18 February 2025 considered a report on the National General Assembly (NGA) of Local Government 2025 and Council resolved (in part) that:
1. That Council determine the Councillors attending the National General Assembly of Local Government 2025 are:
a) Deputy Mayor Howard
b) Cr D’Arienzo
c) Cr Atkins
d) Cr Barlow
e) Cr Antoniou
2. That Council determine the one (1) Councillor that will be the voting delegate is Deputy Mayor Howard.
I note that the deadline for Council staff to register delegates (and still receive the early bird rate is 23 May), and after reading up on information about the significance of the NGA, being the peak annual event for local government in Australia, I would like to attend. As a newly elected Councillor, it would assist with my professional development to attend and be part of councils from around Australia who will gather to discuss, debate, and adopt motions of national significance with a focus on how partnerships, particularly between the Australian Government and local governments, can address immediate challenges facing communities.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Pedestrian Crossing - Park Road Marrickville
From: Councillor Victor Macri
|
MOTION
That Council investigate options to improve the safety at the Park road pedestrian crossing, outside Wilkins Primary School.
|
Background
Dear Councillor Macri,
I write as a concerned resident and parent of Park Road Marrickville with respect to safety concerns on the pedestrian crossing located at Park Road, outside Wilkins Public School, Marrickville.
I consistently notice cars and trucks running through the pedestrian crossing and not stopping or slowing while children and other vulnerable users are actively using this crossing.
I believe the issue stems from poor visibility of the crossing and associated signage , particularly on approach from Sydenham Road towards the crossing given the contour of this road is slightly uphill, obscuring some of the signs that one is approaching a pedestrian crossing until they encounter a user on the crossing.
This is dangerous and only a matter of time before tragedy strikes. We need to improve visibility of this crossing at all times of the day.
I would request that council investigate more effective ways of alerting motorist as they approach this crossing.
It is outside a major school with significant usage and traffic, both pedestrian and motorist.
Yes, the crossing does sit on a raised hump along with some signage,
however the markings being the white zigzag lines on approach to the crossing probably need to be reinforced.
To some extent motorists are aware of school zones operating on school days, however the concern is heightened particularly after school hours where the school is still being used for after school activities including on weekends where the disregard of pedestrian safety really surfaces.
I am often walking my children on a Saturday to partake in school sport activities on school grounds requiring use of this pedestrian crossing, only to have to scream and shout at motorists for not stopping at the crossing to give pedestrians right of way.
Please investigate these concerns for the sake of pedestrian and motorist safety.
I look forward to working collaboratively with you to resolve this concern. Please feel free to contact me as needed.
I attach photos for your reference along with a letter in support of my concerns from the principal of Wilkins Public school, Sarah Jones.
Kind Regards
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
|
1.⇩ |
Photos and letter |
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Sydenham, Tempe Safety and dumping problems
From: Councillor Victor Macri
|
MOTION
1. That Council write to Transport for NSW and request they create a regular maintenance schedule for the vegetation in the Goods Rail corridor that is published on their website.
2. That Council install signage clearly stating illegal dumping will be prosecuted and the area is under surveillance.
|
Background
The Goods Rail Corridor runs through the middle of Sydenham and Tempe and has many negative impacts to the local community but one of the positive ones is it provides a green spine that runs through it. Unfortunately, the vegetation is not maintained, and it is creating a number of issues.
One of these issues is safety for pedestrians using the Milne Lane underpass, particularly at night with the vegetation overgrown on the footpath and laneway. The line of sight is reduced and creating the perfect haven for illegal dumpers to operate in. It is becoming a daily occurrence. I believe they come from outside the area because of the lack of surveillance is on many of the surrounding streets such as Belmore Street that backs on to the rail corridor. This is not only an eyesore to the residents and has a negative impact to the appeal of the area but also a cost to Council.
I believe a big part of the solution is for TfNSW to establish a regular cycle of maintenance to the corridor. It is not enough when residents complain and they react - we need them to be proactive not reactive.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Open Space for Tempe
From: Councillor Victor Macri
|
MOTION
That Council investigates the potential creation of an open space in Tempe alongside the Goods Rail line overpass.
|
Background
The local shops in Tempe on Unwins Bridge Road are having a bit of a renaissance with new shops opening, the latest being an Italian Restaurant. It has been raised by local residents that the shops do not have a square or somewhere to congregate, meet up, or just sit in the sun.
Walking down there, the residents showed an interest in the vacant land next to the rail corridor as a potential opportunity to create such a space. It is currently poorly maintained and an eyesore to the area. With a little love and imagination, it could be transformed into an amazing space that would be an asset to the community.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Marrickville Road Urgent Maintenance
From: Councillor Victor Macri
|
MOTION
That Council urgently make safe the footpath and outdoor dining areas on the platforms between Garners Avenue and Frampton Street. |
Background
Council has been trying to manage the damage to the dinning platforms by the trees for a number of years. It is not only an eyesore but a serious safety issue. Trip hazards in the footpaths, the actual platforms are being lifted by the trees and about to fall on the walkway. Most recently water has been coming out of the footpath possibly a broken pipe making the mosaics in the pavement a slip hazard. We need to do better in maintaining our trees in one of the photos it can be seen that the passing vehicles are the only maintenance they are getting.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Taxis in South Marrickville
From: Deputy Mayor Mat Howard
|
MOTION
1. That Council note the frustration of South Marrickville residents at the ongoing issues posed by parked taxis, hire car vehicles, smash repair vehicles and fleet cars on local streets.
2. That Council acknowledge the strong calls for further action expressed at the recent public meeting held on Friday 11 April.
3. That Council intensify enforcement activities in affected streets, including around Mackey Park.
4. That Council escalate marking and reporting of vehicles under the Public Spaces (Unattended Property) Act 2021 and the impounding of vehicles, where possible.
5. That Council write to known businesses parking vehicles on local streets requesting a meeting and explaining that council is intensifying enforcement and other activities.
6. That Council write to Sydney Airport Corporation noting that local streets in Tempe and Marrickville are being used by airport passengers and requesting they improve communications requesting passengers not park in local streets.
7. That Council consider the feedback received in the previous consultation and in the public meeting on 11 April, and reconsult on a parking proposal that better fits the needs of local residents.
|
Background
Taxis and other vehicles continue to be parked on local streets in South Marrickville and Tempe, putting even greater pressure on local parking.
The issue has been subject to several previous council resolutions, and a proposal to introduce a resident parking scheme was refused under council’s resident parking scheme policy on account of poor participation.
A public meeting was held at Marrickville Library on Friday 11 April, which was well attended, and residents reported that there was little awareness of the proposal and that an amended proposal should be put to the community again.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Reaffirming our commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion
From: Councillor Liz Atkins and Councillor Olivia Barlow
|
MOTION
1. That Council reaffirm the Inner West Council’s commitment to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) and the continued implementation of policies and strategies that embody this commitment, including the Anti-Racism Strategy, the Disability Inclusion Action Plan, the Reconciliation Action Plan, the Gender Equity Strategy, and the Workforce Management Strategy.
2. That Council note that staff are currently developing the Community Safety Action Plan and seek an update at the June 2025 Council meeting.
3. That Council commits to continuing to enhance community safety including through visible support from Council for marginalised communities and supporting local democracy groups for those communities to provide input into development and implementation of Inner West policies, strategic plans and/or programs.
4. That Council recommits to events which reflect our support for DEI including the Inclusion Festival, Feel the Love, National Reconciliation Week events, and Mental Health Month events and other events throughout the year such as Trans and Gender Diverse and Abilities swim events, reestablishment of a refugee swimming program and inclusive library events.
5. That Council agrees that in June 2025 it will hold a Pride Month event at Leichhardt Town Hall in conjunction with local LGBTQIA+ organisations, within existing budget.
|
Background
Our community is a beautiful microcosm of diversity and inclusion, and our Council has a long history of supporting and celebrating that diversity. We must stand with our community now that their rights and their freedom to be who they are is increasingly under attack.
In the first days of his second presidency, President Trump signed several Executive Orders and memoranda ending all United States federal government diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility programs and policies, describing them as "dangerous, demeaning, and immoral". In addition we have seen Executive Orders revoking aims to:
· end discrimination in employment
· promote equal opportunities in employment
· advance equity and opportunity for Native Americans, Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, Pacific Islanders and Black Americans
· prevent and combat discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation
· advance equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex individuals.
In the United Kingdom as well queer rights in particular are under attack, with a recent Supreme Court decision described by some as deeply concerning for human rights and as having major consequences for trans women, and decisions relating to gender affirming care for young trans people.
The impact of events in the United States of America and in the UK are undeniable for our Inner West community. These have emboldened sections of the media, some business leaders and even some political parties/candidates in the Federal election, adding to the climate of uncertainty and creating anxiety.
In their March meeting, the City of Sydney unanimously passed a similar motion to that being proposed here, noting that “in the face of this, we cannot stay silent. We must reaffirm our own commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion and protect and continue the work which embodies this commitment”.
The Inner West is home to a broad range of community organisations which work with and for diverse and marginalised communities and many of which work closely with Council, and which are being engaged on the development of the Community Safety Action Plan. Council also has a range of local democracy groups relating to DEI: Access, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander, Multicultural, Seniors and LGBTQIA+. Council regularly holds or supports events relevant to all these groups.
With Pride Month in June now is the perfect time to hold an event supporting the LGBTQIA+ people and to involve local organisations including Twenty10, the Gender Centre, Pride History, the Pollys Club, the Flying Bats, Rainbow Families, Trans Pride Australia and Dykes on Bikes. As Mardi Gras events were centred around Newtown and Pride Square, it would be appropriate to hold the event in Leichhardt, making it clear that the queer community exists across our LGA. Leichhardt has a past history in supporting queer events, with Leichhardt Council establishing Feel the Love in 2012.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: In-road Tree Planting
From: Councillor Liz Atkins
|
MOTION
That Council prepare a report on the feasibility and cost of increased in-road tree planting across the Inner West, including potential sites such as St Marys Street in Camperdown between Salisbury Road and Chelmsford Street.
|
Background
In-road tree planting has occurred across the Inner West including in Damun Ward. It is also used in City of Sydney and other local government areas in Sydney including Randwick, Waverley and Bayside, and in Melbourne where there are similar narrow streets and old building stock.
The planting of trees within the road or in specifically designed traffic islands or median strips are opportunities to increase our tree canopy within the street network beyond that provided by common planting within the footpath or verge.
In-road planting provides a range of benefits including traffic calming by narrowing roadways and reducing vehicle speeds, opportunity to install trees clear of overhead services, opportunity for passive irrigation and more integrated stormwater management and maximising shade on road pavements by locating trees within the roadway itself.
While in the past trees have been planted directly into the road, either near the kerb or in the middle of the road, current in-road tree planting usually falls into 3 categories:
1. Tree planting within median strips – raised landscaped median strips usually in the centre of the road resulting in no impact on parking. These are usually limited to roads with sufficient width.
2. Tree planting within traffic islands or blisters – traffic islands adjacent to the kerbs in parking lanes.
3. Tree planting within laneways – landscaped traffic islands can be installed, often replacing some parking spaces where sufficient lane width is available.
Like all LGAs, Inner West must increase its tree planting to increase its tree canopy and mitigate urban heating. Increased funding has been allocated for this purpose with around a 1000 trees a year planted in the last term of council. Street trees are vital for cooling our suburbs and to encourage walking and bike riding. In the Inner West many of our streets have narrow footpaths and no verge, so it is impractical to plant trees especially taking into account the need for our streets to be accessible to people with mobility issues and people with strollers and prams. Planting in-road deals with these issues as well as the benefits noted above.
Residents of St Marys Street, Camperdown have proposed in road planting of 4 trees in order to provide cooling for the street and buildings and to calm traffic, for the loss of a single parking spot – see drawing attached. Residents of this part of St Mary Street are supportive in principle, despite some loss of parking (see attached list) and subject to issues such as appropriate species selection and protection of buildings and drains.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
|
1.⇩ |
Drawing showing proposed in-road tree plantings, St Marys Street, Newtown |
|
2.⇩ |
List of supporting residents by address |
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Camperdown Commons
From: Councillor Liz Atkins
|
MOTION
1. That Council note that: a) Camperdown Commons is a site established on public land, owned by the NSW Government and managed by Inner West Council; b) the site was previously home to the Camperdown Bowling Club; c) the former Marrickville Council allowed the site to be sensitively redeveloped and upgraded when the bowling club closed; d) following an expression of interest process, Marrickville Council entered into a long term lease over the site with Canterbury Hurlstone Park RSL with strong conditions that public benefit and access be continued, banning poker machines on the site, creating a new community room for discounted hire and establishing an urban community farm; e) since being leased to Camperdown Commons a number of not for profit and social enterprise activities have operated alongside Camperdown Commons’ commercial restaurant and bar; and f) Pocket City Farms has a long term arrangement with Camperdown Commons to establish and operate an urban farm. Over time the Pocket City Farms has received public grants which it has used to undertake significant upgrades to the site including water tanks. It also provides educational opportunities to schools, community and businesses about sustainable practices.
2. That Council also note that: a) the lessee at Camperdown Commons has offered the leasehold interest in Camperdown Commons for sale via Expressions of Interest which closed on 15 April 2025; b) the leasehold may be assigned with Council’s consent; c) the current lease term ends on 20 June 2026 with two options of 5 years each; d) the agreed manner of operation of the premises includes the operation of a market garden/urban farm; and e) this requirement is complied with via a licence to Pocket City Farms which expires on the same date as the current lease term, i.e. 20 June 2026.
3. That Council reaffirm its commitment to ensuring the site continue to deliver strong community benefits.
4. That Council receive an urgent report about the status of Pocket City Farms.
5. That Council receive a report on the outcome of the Expression of Interest process and any request for consent to assign of the lease at the first available Council meeting after such a request is made to Council.
6. That any request for assignment of the lease at Camperdown Commons be brought to Council for decision.
|
Background
See attachment 1 for background information on the lease with the Canterbury Hurlstone Park RSL.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
|
1.⇩ |
Background information on lease |
|
2.⇩ |
EOI for Camperdown Commons |
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Garbage Bins - Footpath Blockage
From: Councillor Victor Macri
|
MOTION
1. That Council investigate why the bins are not returned to the location where they were put out for collection ensuring they do not impede access.
2. That Council investigate service levels for missed bins, in particular how long it takes to empty the missed bins.
3. That Council investigate why the bins in Tempe Reserve are not all being emptied, as some areas are missed.
|
Background
When bins are not returned to the location where they were put out it causes a number of issues for the residents particularly for the elderly with mobility issues or they are left with rubbish spilled all over the footpath.
When a bin is missed it is a problem but when it’s the entire street and it takes 3 days to come back when it’s the FOGO bin it’s even worse the stench and files is not pleasant.
It has come to my attention the bins in Tempe Reserve are not all being emptied some are and some not.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
|
1.⇩ |
Email from resident |
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Active Super Greenwashing
From: Councillor Olivia Barlow
|
MOTION
1. Council notes that: a) The Local Government Super Scheme (LGSS) was established by Local Government New South Wales (LGNSW) in 1997 for the benefit of local government employees, was re-branded as Active Super in 2021, and merged with Vision Super on 1 March 2025; b) LGNSW is a 50 per cent shareholder of LGSS/Active Super/Vision Super; c) In June 2024, the Federal Court found that former NSW Local Government Super Fund Active Super (LGSS PL) engaged in deceptive and misleading conduct and breached 12DB(1)(a) and 12DF(1) of the ASIC Act; d) On 18 March 2025 the Federal court imposed a penalty of $10.5 million on Active Super for greenwashing; and e) Active Super/Vision Super policy holders will have a portion of their superannuation investment reduced to pay part of the costs arising from the penalty.
2. That Council writes to the President and CEO of LGNSW as the 50 per cent shareholder of LGSS/Active Super/Vision Super and peak advocacy body of Local Government in NSW and calls on them to: a) publish a full written explanation and apology in the LGNSW email circular; b) review the newly merged Vision Super’s status as the preferred Super Fund of local government employees in NSW; and c) outline the steps it has taken to ensure that Vision Super has adequate safeguards in place to prevent any false and misleading conduct occurring in future. |
Background
On 18 March 2025 the Federal Court imposed a penalty of $10.5 million against Active Super for greenwashing misconduct.
In June 2024, the Federal Court found that Active Super contravened the law when it invested in various securities that it had claimed were eliminated or restricted by its environmental, social and governance (ESG) investment screens.
ASIC Deputy Chair Sarah Court said, ‘This is a significant penalty that sends a strong message to companies making sustainable investment claims that those claims need to reflect the true position.
Active Super claimed in its marketing that it eliminated investments that posed too great a risk to the environment and the community, including gambling, coal mining and oil tar sands. Following the invasion of Ukraine, Active Super also made representations that Russian investments were ‘out’.
However, contrary to these representations, Active Super held direct and indirect investments in companies such as SkyCity Entertainment Group Ltd (gambling), Gazprom PJSC (Russian entity), Shell Plc (Oil tar sands) and Whitehaven Coal (Coal mining).
His Honour, Justice O’Callaghan said:
‘It was not disputed that LGSS’s contraventions were serious. LGSS benefitted from its misleading conduct by misrepresenting the “ethical” nature of a significant part of its investments, which on any view enhanced its ability to attract investors to the Active Super fund and enhanced its reputation as a provider of investment funds with ESG characteristics. As a result, investors lost the opportunity to invest in accordance with their investment values.
‘Further, the contravening conduct continued over an extensive period of time (approximately two and a half years); the likely causes of it were never explained; it concerned substantial investments; it was likely to have led to investors losing confidence in ESG programs; and the failure by LGSS to have in place properly functioning systems and processes designed to ensure that its representations were not false or misleading was the responsibility of senior management. Further, when confronted with the allegations by ASIC, LGSS ran a host of contrived arguments in its defence at trial.’
https://download.asic.gov.au/media/rj4lqhcj/25-042mr-asic-v-lgss-pty-ltd-no-3-judgment.pdf
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Raised pedestrian crossing at Darley Road near Allen Street, Leichhardt
From: Councillor Philippa Scott
|
MOTION
1. That Council notes that the intersection of Darley Road and Allen Street, Leichhardt at the eastern exit of Hawthorne Light Rail station is the only light rail station exit between Lilyfield and Dulwich Hill without formal pedestrian safety infrastructure, such as a pedestrian crossing or traffic lights.
2. That Council acknowledges the safety concerns raised by residents, particularly for school children, older residents, light rail users, people with disabilities, and families with strollers or dogs accessing the nearby Hawthorne Canal parklands and sports facilities.
3. That Council notes that this is a state road, and that Transport for NSW has declined requests for a signalised pedestrian crossing at this location on the basis of insufficient crash data, despite clear safety risks and numerous other light rail stops having better pedestrian protections.
4. That Council further notes that existing pedestrian refuges at the roundabout feel inadequate given the width of the road and speed of traffic at this intersection, including vehicles entering from the City West Link.
5. That Council requests that the Mayor write to the Minister for Roads and Transport for NSW to reconsider the installation of a signalised pedestrian crossing at this intersection.
|
Background
Council has received many requests over years from Leichhardt residents highlighting the dangers faced by pedestrians at the Darley Road and Allen Street intersection in Leichhardt, adjacent to the eastern exit of the Hawthorne Light Rail station.
While Transport for NSW has rejected calls for a signalised pedestrian crossing on the grounds of insufficient crash history, this rationale is inadequate in the face of clear community feedback and the significant disparity in safety infrastructure between this and other light rail stops.
This location features fast-moving traffic from the City West Link, limited visibility, and inadequate pedestrian refuge areas. Most other light rail stops in the corridor between Lilyfield and Dulwich Hill are supported by traffic lights, pedestrian crossings, or raised thresholds.
The motion seeks to ensure that Council advocates strongly for a proactive safety response at this location and does not wait for a serious incident to prompt action.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Inner West pedestrian and cyclist street furniture and parking audit
From: Councillor Kerrie Fergusson
|
MOTION 1. That Council undertake an audit of street furniture across the Inner West, including but not limited to: a) Benches and resting points b) Public lighting (particularly pedestrian-scale lighting) c) Drinking fountains d) Bike racks and lockers e) Wayfinding signage and maps.
2. That Council focus the audit on key high-traffic locations, including: a) Main streets b) Shopping complexes c) Supermarkets d) Post offices e) Town Halls f) Light Rail and Ferry stops, Train and Metro stations g) Major sporting grounds h) Flagship parks.
3. That Council identify locations where additional street furniture and bike parking infrastructure are required to improve safety, comfort, and convenience for pedestrians and cyclists across the LGA.
4. That Council prepare a report for the November 2025 Council meeting outlining audit findings and recommendations, to inform consideration for inclusion in the 2026–2027 budget. |
Background
We're on the verge of launching the GreenWay – an active transport superhighway stretching from the north to the south of the LGA. As we move forward, it's time to focus not just on how we connect the GreenWay to schools, shops, parks, and public transport, but also on making sure the right street furniture and parking infrastructure are in place. By doing so, we can support safe and seamless travel for pedestrians and cyclists throughout the Inner West.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Reverse Garbage 50th Anniversary
From: Deputy Mayor Mat Howard and Councillor Chloe Smith
|
MOTION
1. That Council acknowledge and celebrate the 50th Anniversary of Reverse Garbage, Marrickville.
2. That Council partner with Reverse Garbage to support their planned 50th Anniversary event later this year and contribute $10,000 towards the event from the 2025-2026 Inner West Council Budget.
3. That Council include recognition of Reverse Garbage and its 50 year anniversary in the Inner West Council newsletter.
|
Background
Reverse Garbage is a creative reuse centre making a difference in the world by reducing waste and creating change in the way we look at resources.
Established in 1975, Reverse Garbage is an internationally recognised not-for-profit creative reuse centre dedicated to diverting commercial and industrial waste from landfill and giving it new life.
It plays a critical role in both our local and regional circular economy, diverting waste from landfill and draws thousands of visitors from out of area to Marrickville each year.
Reverse Garbage was located at the Addison Road Community Centre for decades before relocating to a warehouse on Carrington Road, Marrickville.
Reverse Garbage is hosting a 50 year anniversary celebration in September 2025.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Lighting in Marrickville Parks
From: Deputy Mayor Mat Howard and Councillor Kerrie Fergusson
|
MOTION
That, further to the resolution passed at the March 2025 council meeting, Council implement the following winter hours for sporting ground flood lighting use in order to facilitate dog walking after dark in winter on the following basis: a) Monday to Sunday 5pm to 11pm at Mackey Park to help facilitate safe use of the Cooks River pathway during the closure of the T3 rail-line b) That lighting at Henson Park be retained at the same times as previously agreed by Council resolution in 2024 following the specific trial and community consultation at Henson Park.
|
Background
At the March Council meeting, councillors resolved to make a trial of winter lighting in Inner West parks permanent.
Due to a procedural error, a further amendment was not debated that would have made special provision for two keys parks in the Marrickville-Midjuburi Ward.
Lighting Mackey Park has been used as a part of a suite of measures to improve safety along the Cooks River pathway as commuters walk to and from Tempe Station during the shut-down of the T3 Bankstown Conversion.
Winter lighting at Henson Park was originally initiated in response to feedback from local residents, joggers and dog walkers. A trial was instigated for the 2024 winter period and it was decided to proceed with a permanent arrangement following intensive community consultation.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: East Tempe Parking
From: Deputy Mayor Mat Howard
|
MOTION
1. That Council note the feedback of the public meeting on 14 April 2025.
2. That Council consider “plain English” signage indicating the additional number of parking spots in the Robyn Webster Indoor Parking lot.
3. That Council provide a further report to the August 2025 Council meeting, considering options to improve parking at Tempe Reserve through: a) Establishing parking spots adjacent to the storage area for boats at the Tempe Motorboat Club, directly opposite the restricted parking on Holbeach Avenue; b) Engaging with the taxi mechanic on Holbeach Avenue regarding parking on Holbeach Avenue and other local streets; c) Engaging with Sydney Airport Corporation regarding passenger and airport worker parking in East Tempe streets, including communications deterring parking on East Tempe streets; d) Creating a mobility parking space on Holbeach Ave near the storage area for the Tempe Motorboat Club; e) Considering no stopping signage at the end of local streets in East Tempe f) Considering the establishment of shared streets and one way streets in East Tempe; g) Indicating the impact of the Inner West @40km project on local streets in East Tempe; h) The feasibility of establishing a footpath on South Street, Tempe; i) Conducting further traffic studies for the area after consulting with sports clubs about high utilisation rates of Tempe Reserve; j) Considering the timing of future Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) studies required as part of the Bunnings Tempe development; and k) Other initiatives.
|
Background
Parking in East Tempe continues to cause significant challenges for residents and users of Tempe Reserve.
The issue has been subject to several previous council resolutions, and subsequent traffic studies conducted by councils officers have raised a series of issues.
A public meeting was held at Marrickville Library on Friday 14 April, which was well attended, and residents reported that council efforts had not resolved the issues and that further action is required.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Camdenville Oval Koori Knockout Blue Plaque
From: Deputy Mayor Mat Howard
|
MOTION
1. That Council note Camdenville Oval has been successfully chosen as a site for a NSW Heritage Blue Plaque by the NSW Government for its role as the first location of the Koori Knockout in 1971, following advocacy from the Inner West Council.
2. That Council promotes this accomplishment in the next available edition of the Inner West Community News, along with historical information about the Koori Knockout.
3. That Council includes the unveiling of the blue plaque as part of the official reopening of Camdenville Oval following the recent refurbishment, if possible given project timelines. In the case it is possible, Council engages with Heritage NSW for its inclusion/unveiling.
4. That Council should the unveiling of the Blue Plaque form part of the event to reopen Camdenville Oval, work closely with the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Advisory Committee and organisers of the Koori Knockout about the best way to do so.
|
Background
The Blue Plaques program has been established to celebrate and acknowledge the unique and diverse heritage of NSW.
According to the Blue Plaques website, more than 65 plaques have been announced since the program began in 2021, including recognition of Quong Tart in Ashfield.
In May 2024, Council resolved to consult with the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Advisory Committee and to apply to the Blue Plaques Heritage Program to acknowledge that Camdenville Oval as the site of the first Koori Knockout in 1971 (C0524/1).
In March 2025, the NSW Government announced that the application to include Camdenville Oval in the Blue Plaques program was successful, a significant achievement for local Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and for the Inner West at large.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Improved Collaboration with Homes NSW on rubbish dumping on and outside public housing properties
From: Councillor Philippa Scott
|
MOTION
1. That Council notes the ongoing issue of rubbish dumping and associated vermin and public health risks occurring outside Homes NSW properties in the inner west.
2. That Council notes that the Deputy Mayor, Mat Howard, has put several motions to Council on this topic, and that Council has previously resolved to: a) Form a working group comprising Council staff, representatives from Homes NSW and community housing providers to improve and streamline waste collection in large social and community housing communities in the Inner West (December 2024); and b) Receive a report in June 2025 on ongoing engagement with Homes NSW to improve waste management, and thereafter twice yearly (March 2025).
3. That Council acknowledges that Inner West Council staff have taken steps, including waste removal when notified, increased monitoring of dumping hotspots, and increased bin provision and bin collection to support residents of the properties.
4. That Council recognises that Homes NSW has agreed to some measures, including installing CCTV and lighting at the property in Whites Creek Lane, Annandale, conducted a letterbox drop, and referring tenant needs to Homes NSW’s Inner West tenancy management unit, but notes that implementation timelines remain unclear and community concern is growing.
5. That Council requests the Mayor write to the NSW Minister for Housing, and the CEO of Homes NSW, urging that Homes NSW urgently engage in the already resolved formal consultation with the Inner West Council on a coordinated and long-term strategy to address: a) Waste and maintenance management at Homes NSW estates; b) Social service outreach and support for tenants; and c) Communication and accountability processes.
6. That Council supports local community initiatives to improve neighbourhood conditions around affected properties, such as the proposed revival of the Whites Creek Lane Neighbourhood Association, and commits to assisting with: a) Grant applications; b) Access to council programs such as the Perfect Match mural scheme; and c) Access to Council venues for meetings.
7. That Council reaffirms that a progress report be brought to Council at the June meeting outlining: a) Correspondence with the Minister and Homes NSW; b) Any commitments or timelines secured; and c) Outcomes of resident engagement and Council’s waste management response. |
Background
Homes NSW properties, across the inner west, but particularly in Whites Creek Lane,
Annandale and Elliott St, Balmain have become ongoing sites of concern for both tenants and
nearby residents due to the frequent and unmanaged accumulation of dumped rubbish,
including furniture, white goods, kitchen waste, and abandoned trolleys. This has led to
serious public health and safety concerns, including rodent activity and reduced amenity for
surrounding households.
Inner West Council staff have responded to requests by removing waste, reporting trolley
issues to shopping centres, and placing the sites on a waste dumping “hotspot” list for more
frequent inspection and cleaning.
Cr Philippa Scott has liaised directly with Homes NSW, who have advised they will install
CCTV and lighting in Annandale (pending implementation delays), conduct a letterbox drop
with information on waste management, and refer tenancy concerns to Homes NSW’s Inner
West tenancy unit. However, Homes NSW’ s response remains delayed and bureaucratic, and
residents have expressed low confidence in timely or lasting resolution.
Deputy Mayor Mat Howard has called for strengthened collaboration between Council and
Homes NSW to improve waste management in public and community housing across the
Inner West. This includes reaffirming Council’s commitment to ongoing engagement with Homes NSW and community housing providers, establishing a dedicated staff working group to address waste collection in large housing complexes, and receiving regular reports—beginning in June 2025 and continuing biannually—on the issues raised and progress made in resolving them. To date, not enough progress has not been made.
A more coordinated approach to waste management is required, and Homes NSW are urged
to consult with Inner West Council staff, and inner west residents on the ongoing management
of waste on and outside their properties, so that it does not fall to tenants and nearby residents
to report and manage waste, or to Council staff to continue to clean up dumped rubbish.
Annandale residents have also begun organising to revive the Whites Creek Lane Neighbourhood Association to support long-term, community-led solutions to beautify and establish community ownership over the lane. Council’s support for this initiative—along with stronger partnerships between Council and Homes NSW—will be essential to ensuring safe, clean, and well-managed environments for all residents.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Question on Notice: White Bay Cruise Ship Terminal Impacts
From: Councillor Ismet Tastan
In the last 2 years Council has resolved to write and meet with the Minister for Transport seeking information and updates regarding shore power at the White Bay Cruise Ship Terminal and ongoing noise issues.
The first in September 2023 council resolved to write to the Minister for Transport seeking information about the following:
· when shore power is expected to become operational at White Bay Wharf 5;
· whether use of shore power will be mandatory for all cruise ships at White Bay Wharf 5 (once implemented) and if not, why not;
· what plans for future use of White Bay Wharf 4 are being made and whether shore power will be provided;
· what plans are being made to improve fuel quality used by cruise ships within Sydney Harbour;
· what fuel quality regulations will be required for ships at berth (i.e. during arrival and preparation for departure of cruise ships); and
· how the impact of noise from cruise ships on the local community will be addressed.
The second in the Mayoral Minute on April 9th 2024 relating to Ship to Shore Power at White Bay Cruise Passenger Terminal.
That Council write to Transport for NSW seeking an urgent meeting to discuss the implementation of shore to ship power at White Bay Cruise Passenger Terminal and propose the following:
a) the provision of shore to ship power at all berths that host cruise ships, including berths 4 and 5; and
b) the mandating of the use of shore to ship power by all cruise ships docked at White Bay.
Question
Did council receive a written response from the Minister for Transport in relation to the Sept 2023 resolution ? If so, please provide a copy of the response.
Answer
The Minister for Transport responded in December 2023 to the correspondence arising from the Mayoral Minute of September 2023 and a copy of this is provided at Attachment 1.
Question
Did the requested meeting as a result of the Mayoral Minute on April 9th with TfNSW go ahead?
a) If yes, what was the outcome of the meeting following the Mayoral minute on April 9th.
b) If not – what actions did Inner West Council undertake to follow up with TfNSW?
Answer
Meeting requests were initiated by Inner West Council and ultimately the meeting took place on 15 April 2025 at the Mayor’s invitation. It was attended by John McKenna Acting Chief Executive Officer and James Abbott Group Executive Strategy, Corporate and Public Affairs. This meeting was followed up with correspondence by the Port Authority which is at Attachment 2.
|
1.⇩ |
Correspondence from the Minister for Transport |
|
2.⇩ |
Correspondence from the Ports Authority |
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Question on Notice: Synthetic Turf
From: Councillor Andrew Blake
Question
Has any of the following individuals or companies made presentations to Council staff in the last 3 years? If so, on what dates?
a. Martin Sheppard
b. Smart Connection Consultancy
c. SportENG
Answer
See below
Question
Has any of the following individuals or companies been engaged by Council to provide advice, training, or undertake consultancy work in the last 3 years? If so what was the nature of the work, the date the work was done and the cost of the work?
a. Martin Sheppard
b. Smart Connections
c. SportENG
Answer
Please see below Council engagements with Martin Sheppard (Director of Smart Connection Consultancy) :
· August 2023 – Lambert Park All Weather Turf Renewal – Advice and Consultancy services on the existing field, and preparation of technical specifications for renewal (Approx $15,000)
· April 2024 - Hybrid and All Weather Sports Fields IWC Councillor Briefing which formed a Power Point Presentation (Cost $6,400)
· June 2024 – Centenary Park All Weather Investigation and Initial Concept Design – Advice and Consultancy (Cost $7,500)
It’s worth noting that Martin Sheppard - Smart Connection Consultancy is a leading specialist consultant assisting councils in all-weather sports fields.
Council has not directly engaged SportEng, though they have been a sub consultant of Smart Connection’s engagements with Council.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Question on Notice: SUV use in the Inner West
From: Councillor Olivia Barlow
Comment by the General Manager:
Answers to the questions will be provided at the Ordinary Council meeting in May 2025.
Question
What consideration has Council given to discouraging the uptake of SUVs in the Inner West
LGA, on the basis they emit more pollution and are more dangerous for pedestrians and other
vulnerable road users, than smaller cars?
Question
1. How many SUVs have been registered in the Inner West LGA since 2017, broken down by year?
2. How does this compare to the number of passenger cars registered in the Inner West LGA?
3. How does this compare to the number of EVs registered in the Inner West LGA?
Question
How many SUVs have been registered to the Inner West Council fleet since 2017, broken down by year?
Question
1. How does Council monitor and track road safety across the Inner West LGA, including danger spots and/or trends in vehicle usage that may impact the safety of pedestrians, cyclists, children, and other vulnerable road users?
2. What measures has Council put in place to prevent road injuries and fatalities in the Inner West LGA, particularly around schools and childcare facilities?
3. Has Council taken any specific measures to improve road safety across the Inner West LGA, given SUV use is increasing and children are 8 times more likely to be killed when struck by an SUV compared to a smaller passenger vehicle?
Question
1. How many pedestrian fatalities in road crashes involving an SUV in the Inner West LGA have been recorded since 2017, broken down by year?
2. How does this compare to pedestrian fatalities in road crashes involving a standard passenger car?
Question
1. How many parking infringements have been issued to SUVs for parking in a manner that obstructs, including but not limited to footpaths, driveways, other parking spaces, and other traffic in the Inner West LGA since 2017, broken down by year?
2. How does this compare to parking infringements issued to standard passenger cars for similar infringements?
3. Was the Inner West Council approached to make a submission to the Standards Australia consultation on increasing the length of car spaces, and if so, what was the submission?
Question
1. How many complaints have been received by the Inner West Council regarding SUVs since 2017, broken down by year and the nature of the complaint?
2. How much has the Inner West Council spent per year on roads repair and maintenance since 2017, broken down by year?
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Sydney Gateway Project and Hand Back of Council Leased Land
Council at its meeting on 11 March 2025 resolved that the matter be deferred to the meeting to be held on 29 April 2025.
Prepared By: Matthew Pearce - General Counsel
Authorised By: Peter Gainsford - General Manager
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
DISCUSSION
Council will move into a closed session to deal with Sydney Gateway Project and Hand Back of Council Leased Land as the information is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993. The matter is deemed that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
Pursuant to section 10A(2), 10(2) and 10A(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public will be excluded from the meeting on the basis the business to be considered is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993.
|
Confidential Report - Sydney Gateway Project and Hand Back of Council Leased Land - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
|
Map identifying the Sydney Gateway Road within Inner West local government area - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
|
Map showing the Freehold Land owned by TfNSW and Council’s Leased lands - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
|
Map showing the location of the noise mounds and Tempe mound - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: Sydney Gateway - Lease of Industrial Lands - Tempe
Prepared By: Scott Mullen - Strategic Investments and Property Manager
Authorised By: Ryann Midei - Director Property and Major Projects
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
DISCUSSION
Council will move into a closed session to deal with the Sydney Gateway – Lease of Industrial Lands – Tempe as the information is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993. The matter is deemed confidential, as the matter is commercial information of a confidential nature, that would if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business and if disclosed confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the council.
Pursuant to section 10A(2), 10(2) and 10A(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public will be excluded from the meeting on the basis the business to be considered is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993.
|
Confidential Report - Lease of Industrial Lands - Tempe - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business. |
|
|
Evaluation of Intent to Lease Swamp Road s153 Roads Act 1993 - Confidential - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business. |
|
|
Industrial Lands - Tempe - Lease - Confidential - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business. |
|
|
Industrial Lands - Tempe - Lease Section 153 Roads Act 1993 - Confidential - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business. |
|
|
Council Meeting 29 April 2025 |
Subject: RFT 41-24 Insurance Services
Prepared By: Julian Sakarai - Acting Senior Manager Governance and Risk
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
DISCUSSION
Council will move into a closed session to deal with RFT41-24 Insurance Services as the information is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(c) and (10A(2)(di) of the Local Government Act 1993. The matter is deemed that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
Pursuant to section 10A(2), 10(2) and 10A(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public will be excluded from the meeting on the basis the business to be considered is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(c) and section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993.
|
Confidential - RFT41-24 Insurance Services - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
