|
AGENDA R |
Council Meeting
TUESDAY 17 JUNE 2025
6:30 PM
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Live Streaming of Council Meeting
In the spirit of open, accessible and transparent government, this meeting of the Inner West Council is being streamed live on Council’s website. By speaking at a Council meeting, members of the public agree to being recorded and must ensure their speech to the Council is respectful and use appropriate language. A person who uses defamatory, discriminatory or offensive language may be exposed to liability for which Council takes no responsibility. Any part of this meeting that is held in closed session will not be recorded.
Council meetings are streamed live on Council’s website. This allows our community greater access to Council proceedings, decisions and debate.
Pre-Registration to Speak at Council Meetings
Members of the public must register by 2pm of the day of the Meeting to speak at Council Meetings. If you wish to register to speak please fill in a Register to Speak Form, available from the Inner West Council website, including:
Are there any rules for speaking at a Council Meeting?
The following rules apply when addressing a Council meeting:
What happens after I submit the form?
You will be contacted by Governance Staff to confirm your registration. If you indicated that you will speak online, you will be provided with a link to the online meeting. Your request will then be added to a list that is shown to the Chairperson on the night of the meeting.
Where Items are deferred, Council reserves the right to defer speakers until that Item is heard on the next occasion.
Accessibility
Inner West Council is committed to ensuring people with a disability have equal opportunity to take part in Council and Committee Meetings. At the Council Chambers at Ashfield, there is a hearing loop service available to assist persons with a hearing impairment. If you have any other access or disability related participation needs and wish to know more, call 9392 5536.
Persons in the public gallery are advised that under the Local Government Act 1993, a person may NOT record a Council meeting without the permission of Council.
Any persons found recording without authority will be expelled from the meeting.
“Record” includes the use of any form of audio, video and still camera equipment or mobile phone capable of recording speech.
An audio recording of this meeting will be taken for the purpose of verifying the accuracy of the minutes.
Statement of Ethical Obligations
The Mayor and Councillors are bound by the Oath/ Affirmation of Office made at the start of the Council term to undertake their civic duties in the best interests of the people of the Inner West Council and to faithfully and impartially carry out the functions, powers, authorities and discretions vested in them under the Local Government Act or any other Act, to the best of their skill and judgement.
It is also a requirement that the Mayor and Councillors disclose conflicts of interest in relation to items listed for consideration on the Agenda or which are considered at this meeting in accordance with Council’s Code of Conduct and Code of Meeting Practice.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
|
AGENDA |
1 Acknowledgement of Country
2 Apologies and Request for Remote Attendance
3 Notice of Webcasting
4 Statement of Ethical Obligations
5 Disclosures of Interest (Part 4 (Pecuniary Interests) and Part 5 (non-pecuniary conflicts of interest) of Council’s Code of Conduct)
6 Moment
of Quiet Contemplation
7 Confirmation of Minutes Page
Minutes
of 20 May 2025 Council 7
8 Public Forum – Hearing from All Registered Speakers
9 Condolence Motions
ITEM Page
C0625(1) Item 1 Condolence Motion: Dr Peter Bokor 158
10 Mayoral Minutes
Nil at the time of printing.
11 Reports for Council Decision
ITEM Page
C0625(1) Item 2 Draft Economic Development Budget 2025-26 159
C0625(1) Item 3 Public Exhibition - Draft Economic Development Strategy 163
C0625(1) Item 4 Investment Policy Update 195
C0625(1) Item 5 Post Exhibition - Community Strategic Plan, Delivery Program 2025-29 and Operational Plan and Budget 2025/26, and Resourcing Strategy 220
C0625(1) Item 6 Post Exhibition - Special Entertainment Precincts Planning Proposal 582
C0625(1) Item 7 Post Exhibition - Draft Compliance and Enforcement Policy 719
C0625(1) Item 8 Post Exhibition - Code of Conduct 739
C0625(1) Item 9 Post Exhibition - Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy 796
C0625(1) Item 10 Public Exhibition - Code of Meeting Practice 819
C0625(1) Item 11 Public Exhibition - Loyalty Square, Balmain Improvement Works 884
C0625(1) Item 12 Local Traffic Committee Meeting - 19 May 2025 901
C0625(1) Item 13 Local Democracy Groups progress report and policy challenges for the term 917
C0625(1) Item 14 Planning Proposal for 75-85 Crown Street and 116 Princes Highway, St Peters 921
C0625(1) Item 15 Use of recycled plastics in Inner West procurement and projects 941
C0625(1) Item 16 Recreational Needs Survey for Girls, Young Women and Gender Diverse People 945
C0625(1) Item 17 Clontarf Cottage Refurbishment Update 952
C0625(1) Item 18 Local Government Remuneration Tribunal - Determination of Mayor and Councillor Fees 2025/26 957
C0625(1) Item 19 Local Government NSW Board Election and Annual Conference 2025 1007
12 Reports for Noting
ITEM Page
C0625(1) Item 20 Investment Report at 31 May 2025 1010
C0625(1) Item 21 Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Upgrade - Monthly Project Update 1065
C0625(1) Item 22 Leichhardt Oval Refurbishment - Monthly Project Update 1070
C0625(1) Item 23 Internal Ombudsman Shared Service review of Customer Service Improvements 1074
C0625(1) Item 24 Customer Experience Strategy 2024-2027 Update 1080
C0625(1) Item 25 Christmas Decorations 1089
C0625(1) Item 26 Tourism Action Plan Expenditure - Bi-Monthly Report 1094
C0625(1) Item 27 Fire & Rescue NSW Inspection Report - 260A Liverpool Road Ashfield 1099
C0625(1) Item 28 Working with Homes NSW and social housing providers to improve waste management across the Inner West 1106
C0625(1) Item 29 Pocket City Farms 1110
C0625(1) Item 30 Utilisation of Council Venues 1117
C0625(1) Item 31 Robert Street, Balmain - Opportunities for separated pedestrian/cycle lane 1121
C0625(1) Item 32 Gambling Harm Minimisation 1124
C0625(1) Item 33 Priority Access to Council Early Learning Centres for Children of Women in Refuges 1128
C0625(1) Item 34 2024-2025 Annual Pecuniary Interest Returns 1131
C0625(1) Item 35 Community Safety Action Plan 1140
13 Notices of Motion
ITEM Page
C0625(1) Item 36 Notice of Motion: Jubilee Place 1144
C0625(1) Item 37 Notice of Motion: Parking availability to local shopping strips 1147
C0625(1) Item 38 Notice of Motion: Pedestrian Safety at Ashfield Park; Traffic Calming Measures at Orpington and Pembroke Street, Ashfield 1149
C0625(1) Item 39 Notice of Motion: Key Site Silver Street Open Space 1152
C0625(1) Item 40 Notice of Motion: Commemorating the 80th anniversaries of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on 6 and 9 August 1945 1154
C0625(1) Item 41 Notice of Motion: Koori Knockout Live Screening 1156
C0625(1) Item 42 Notice of Motion: Bower Bike 1st birthday 1158
C0625(1) Item 43 Notice of Motion: Hercules Street, Ashfield cleanliness 1159
C0625(1) Item 44 Notice of Motion: Inner West Active Transport Survey 1161
C0625(1) Item 45 Notice of Motion: Floodlighting upgrade Birchgrove Oval 1163
C0625(1) Item 46 Notice of Motion: Kids Play / Kids Say - Playground Consultation 1164
C0625(1) Item 47 Notice of Motion: Biodegradable dog waste bags main street trial – Balmain / Rozelle 1165
C0625(1) Item 48 Notice of Motion: Pedestrian safety intersection of Marion Street and Renwick Street, Leichhardt 1166
C0625(1) Item 49 Notice of Motion: Improving Pedestrian Safety on Pemell Lane, Newtown 1167
C0625(1) Item 50 Notice of Motion: Apprentices, trainees and cadets 1168
C0625(1) Item 51 Notice of Motion: Marrickville Library maintenance blitz 1169
C0625(1) Item 52 Notice of Motion: Extended season at Steel Park Waterplay Park 1170
C0625(1) Item 53 Notice of Motion: Circular economy support and promotion 1171
C0625(1) Item 54 Notice of Motion: Airspace land adjacent to St Peters Town Hall 1172
C0625(1) Item 55 Notice of Motion: Inner West Flood Management Advisory Committee Terms of Reference amendment 1173
14 Questions From Councillors
ITEM Page
C0625(1) Item 56 Question on Notice: Greenway Art Prize 1174
C0625(1) Item 57 Question on Notice: Inner West Housing Plan 1175
15 Reports with Confidential Information
Reports appearing in this section of the Business Paper are confidential in their entirety or contain confidential information in attachments.
The confidential information has been circulated separately.
ITEM Page
C0625(1) Item 58 RFT 09-24 Print and Associated Services Tender Evaluation Report 1176
C0625(1) Item 59 Contributions and Reimbursements 1177
C0625(1) Item 60 Potential Acquisition of TfNSW owned property at 2 Hay Street Leichhardt (car park) 1178
C0625(1) Item 61 Licence to Wests Tigers for Leichhardt Oval 1180
C0625(1) Item 62 Quarterly Strategic Investment Property Report 1181
C0625(1) Item 63 RFT 10-25 Steel Park and Hammond Park Sporting Grounds Upgrade 1184
C0625(1) Item 64 Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Stage 2 Upgrade Construction Contract EOI 1185
C0625(1) Item 65 Bignell Lane, Annandale 1187
C0625(1) Item 66 Return of Notional Member Interest from CivicRisk Mutual Limited 1188
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting held on 20 May 2025 at Ashfield Service Centre
Meeting commenced at 6.33pm
|
Present: |
|
|
Darcy Byrne Mat Howard Izabella Antoniou Liz Atkins Olivia Barlow Andrew Blake Jo Carlisle Vicki Clay Jessica D’Arienzo Kerrie Fergusson Victor Macri Vittoria Raciti Philippa Scott Chloe Smith Ismet Tastan Simone Plummer |
Mayor Deputy Mayor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor General Manager Director Planning |
|
Ryann Midei |
Director Property and Major Projects |
|
Ruth Callaghan Darren Morris Julian Sakarai Matthew Pearce Gunika Singh |
Director Community Acting Director Corporate Acting Senior Manager Governance and Risk General Counsel Team Leader Strategic Planning |
|
Katherine Paixao Darcie Huisman |
Business Paper Coordinator Business Paper Officer |
APOLOGIES AND REQUEST FOR REMOTE PARTICIPATION:
Nil.
Procedural Motion (D’Arienzo/Scott)
That, to assist Councillors manage conflicts of interest that cannot be the subject of Special Disclosures, Council when dealing with Item 2: Our Fairer Future Plan - Council's approach for new housing in the Inner West, rearranges the suburbs and groups those suburbs together where there are no Councillor conflicts of interest that cannot be the subject of Special Disclosures, and votes on motions 1 to 3 together, and then motions 4(a) - 4(e) in seriatum/separately as below:
a) Annandale, Ashbury, Ashfield, Balmain, Balmain East, Birchgrove, Camperdown, Croydon, Croydon Park, Dulwich Hill, Enmore, Hurlstone Park, Lewisham, Lilyfield, Newtown, Petersham, Stanmore, Summer Hill, Sydenham and Tempe
a) Marrickville
b) St Peters
c) Haberfield
d) Rozelle
e) Leichhardt
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
DISCLOSURES OF INTEREST:
Councillor Blake declared a pecuniary interest in Item 2 - 'Fairer Future for the Inner West’ – Council-Led alternate Planning Approach for New Housing due to his principal residence being within the areas identified in Item 2. Due to the significant portion of the LGA that is impacted by the proposed reforms, he made, prior to the meeting, a Special Disclosure in accordance with the Code of Conduct. This provides an exemption in this instance and as such he will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter.
Councillor Tastan declared a pecuniary interest in Item 2 - 'Fairer Future for the Inner West’ – Council-Led alternate Planning Approach for New Housing due to his principal residence being within the areas identified in Item 2. Due to the significant portion of the LGA that is impacted by the proposed reforms, he made, prior to the meeting, a Special Disclosure in accordance with the Code of Conduct. This provides an exemption in this instance and as such he will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter
Councillor Atkins declared a pecuniary interest in Item 2 - 'Fairer Future for the Inner West’ – Council-Led alternate Planning Approach for New Housing due to their principal residence being within the areas identified in Item 2. Due to the significant portion of the LGA that is impacted by the proposed reforms, they made, prior to the meeting, a Special Disclosure in accordance with the Code of Conduct. This provides an exemption in this instance and as such they will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter.
Councillor Barlow declared pecuniary interest in Item 2 - 'Fairer Future for the Inner West’ – Council-Led alternate Planning Approach for New Housing due to her principal residence and the principal residence of her associates being within the areas identified in Item 2. Due to the significant portion of the LGA that is impacted by the proposed reforms, she made, prior to this meeting, a Special Disclosure, in accordance with the Code of Conduct. This provides an exemption in this instance and as such she will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter.
Councillor Barlow declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 8 - Local Traffic Committee Meeting – 14 April 2025 as she works in the Office of Kobi Shetty MP, who in her capacity as the member for Balmain, has a representative on the Traffic Committee. She will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter as the vote is exercised through a representative.
Councillor Antoniou declared a pecuniary interest in Item 2 - 'Fairer Future for the Inner West’ – Council-Led alternate Planning Approach for New Housing due to her principal residence being within the areas identified in Item 2. Due to the significant portion of the LGA that is impacted by the proposed reforms, she made, prior to the meeting, a Special Disclosure in accordance with the Code of Conduct. This provides an exemption in this instance and as such she will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter.
Councillor Raciti declared a pecuniary interest in Item 2 - 'Fairer Future for the Inner West’ – Council-Led alternate Planning Approach for New Housing due to her principal residence and the principal residence of her associates being within the areas identified in Item 2. Due to the significant portion of the LGA that is impacted by the proposed reforms, she made, prior to the meeting, a Special Disclosure in accordance with the Code of Conduct. This provides an exemption in this instance and as such she will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter.
Councillor Raciti declared a significant, pecuniary interest in Item 25 – Notice of Motion: Haberfield Business Roundtable, as she is a Haberfield business owner. She will leave the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter.
Councillor Smith declared a pecuniary interest in Item 2 - 'Fairer Future for the Inner West’ – Council-Led alternate Planning Approach for New Housing due to her principal residence and the principal residence of her associates being within the areas identified in Item 2. Due to the significant portion of the LGA that is impacted by the proposed reforms, she made, prior to this meeting, a Special Disclosure in accordance with the Code of Conduct. This provides an exemption in this instance and as such she will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter.
Councillor Macri declared a pecuniary interest in Item 2 - 'Fairer Future for the Inner West’ – Council-Led alternate Planning Approach for New Housing due the principal residence of my associates being within the areas identified in Item 2. Due to the significant portion of the LGA that is impacted by the proposed reforms, I have made, prior to this meeting, a Special Disclosure, in accordance with the Code of Conduct. This provides an exemption in this instance and as such he will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter.
Councillor Macri declared a significant, pecuniary interest in Item 2 - 'Fairer Future for the Inner West’ – Council-Led alternate Planning Approach for New Housing in respect of the motion 4 (a) Marrickville which corresponds to Officer Recommendation 1(q) Marrickville (which was later considered by Council as point 13a Marrickville of the motion) as he has property interests in Marrickville. He will leave the meeting during the discussion and voting on Item 2 regarding Marrickville.
Councillor Fergusson declared a pecuniary interest in Item 2 - 'Fairer Future for the Inner West’ – Council-Led alternate Planning Approach for New Housing due to her principal residence and the principal residence of her associates being within the areas identified in Item 2. Due to the significant portion of the LGA that is impacted by the proposed reforms, she made, prior to this meeting, a Special Disclosure in accordance with the Code of Conduct. This provides an exemption in this instance and as such she will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter.
Councillor Howard declared a pecuniary interest in Item 2 - 'Fairer Future for the Inner West’ – Council-Led alternate Planning Approach for New Housing due to his principal residence and the principal residence of his associate being within the areas identified in Item 2. Due to the significant portion of the LGA that is impacted by the proposed reforms, he made, prior to this meeting, a Special Disclosure in accordance with the Code of Conduct. This provides an exemption in this instance and as such he will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter.
Councillor Howard declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary in Item 38 - Mayoral Minute: Investing in our Community-Securing the Future of Marrickville Parklands and Golf Club as he is a social member of the Marrickville Golf Club. He will remain in the meeting.
Councillor Clay pecuniary interest in Item 2 - Fairer Future for the Inner West – 'Fairer Future for the Inner West’ – Council-Led alternate Planning Approach for New Housing due to her principal residence being within the areas identified in Item 2. Due to the significant portion of the LGA that is impacted by the proposed reforms, she made, prior to this meeting, a Special Disclosure, in accordance with the Code of Conduct. This provides an exemption in this instance and as such she will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter.
Councillor Clay declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 2 - 'Fairer Future for the Inner West’ – Council-Led alternate Planning Approach for New Housing in respect of the motions 1 (a) Stanmore, 1 (a) Newtown and 4 (b) St Peters, which corresponds to Officer Recommendations 1(u) Stanmore, 1(r) Newtown and 1(v) St Peters (which was later considered by Council as points 1a Stanmore, 1a Newtown and 14a St Peters of the motion). She will remain in the meeting during the discussion and voting on the matters as her interests are sufficiently remote.
Councillor Clay declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 16 - New Public Toilets - Weekley, McNeilly and Jarvie Parks as her primary residence is in the vicinity of Weekley park. She will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter as it is not currently clear on the exact location that the proposed toilet facilities will be installed.
Councillor Scott declared a pecuniary interest in Item 2 - 'Fairer Future for the Inner West’ – Council-Led alternate Planning Approach for New Housing due to her principal residence and the principal residence of her associates being within the areas identified in Item 2. Due to the significant portion of the LGA that is impacted by the proposed reforms, she made, prior to this meeting, a Special Disclosure in accordance with the Code of Conduct. This provides an exemption in this instance and as such she will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter.
Councillor Scott declared a significant, pecuniary interest in Item 2 - 'Fairer Future for the Inner West’ – Council-Led alternate Planning Approach for New Housing in respect of the motion 4 (a) Marrickville which corresponds to Officer Recommendation 1(q) Marrickville (which was later considered by Council as point 13a Marrickville of the motion) as her employer has property interests in Marrickville. She will leave the meeting during the discussion and voting on Item 2 regarding Marrickville.
Councillor Carlisle declared a pecuniary interest in Item 2 - 'Fairer Future for the Inner West’ – Council-Led alternate Planning Approach for New Housing due to her principal residence being within the areas identified in Item 2. Due to the significant portion of the LGA that is impacted by the proposed reforms, she made, prior to this meeting, a Special Disclosure in accordance with the Code of Conduct. This provides an exemption in this instance and as such she will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter.
Councillor Carlisle declared a significant, pecuniary interest in Item 2 - 'Fairer Future for the Inner West’ – Council-Led alternate Planning Approach for New Housing in respect of the motions 4 (a) Marrickville and 4 (b) St Peters, which corresponds to Officer Recommendations 1(q) Marrickville and 1(v) St Peters (which was later considered by Council as point 13a Marrickville and 14a St Peters of the motion). She will leave the meeting during the discussion and voting on Item 2 regarding Marrickville and St Peters.
Councillor D’Arienzo declared a pecuniary interest in Item 2 - 'Fairer Future for the Inner West’ – Council-Led alternate Planning Approach for New Housing due to her principal residence and the principal residence of her associate being within the areas identified in Item 2. Due to the significant portion of the LGA that is impacted by the proposed reforms, she made, prior to this meeting, a Special Disclosure in accordance with the Code of Conduct. This provides an exemption in this instance and as such she will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter.
The Director Community declared a significant, pecuniary interest in Item 2 - 'Fairer Future for the Inner West’ – Council-Led alternate Planning Approach for New Housing due to her principal residence being within the areas proposed by the reforms. He advised Council that he has not participated in the preparation of the report or discussions in relation to Item 2. She will leave the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter.
The General Manager declared a significant, pecuniary interest in Item 2 - 'Fairer Future for the Inner West’ – Council-Led alternate Planning Approach for New Housing due to the principal residence of an associate being within the areas proposed by the reform. He advised Council that he has not participated in the preparation of the report or discussions in relation to Item 2. He will leave the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter.
The Mayor, Councillor Byrne, declared a pecuniary interest in Item 2 - 'Fairer Future for the Inner West’ – Council-Led alternate Planning Approach for New Housing due to his principal residence and the principal residence of his associate being within the areas identified in Item 2. Due to the significant portion of the LGA that is impacted by the proposed reforms, he made, prior to the meeting, a Special Disclosure in accordance with the Code of Conduct. This provides an exemption in this instance and as such he will remain in the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter.
The Mayor, Councillor Byrne declared a significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 2 - 'Fairer Future for the Inner West’ – Council-Led alternate Planning Approach for New Housing in respect of the motions 4 (d) Rozelle and 4 (e) Leichhardt, which corresponds to Officer Recommendations 1(n) Leichhardt and 1(t) Rozelle (which was later considered by Council as points 16a Rozelle and 17a Leichhardt of the motion) as he has a close personal relationship with persons with property interests in Rozelle and Leichhardt. He considers this a significant, non-pecuniary interest as it is a personal relationship that does not involve a pecuniary interest for him for the purposes of the Code of Conduct, but could give rise to a perception that he might be influenced by a private interest when considering this matter. Out of an abundance of caution and in the interest of full transparency, he will leave the meeting during the discussion and voting on Item 2 regarding Rozelle and Leichhardt.
Councillor Blake declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 36 - RFT 09-24 Print and Associated Services Tender Evaluation Report as he has worked with many of the tenderers. Out of an abundance of caution, he will leave the meeting during discussion and voting on the matter.
***All special disclosures tabled at the meeting are available at the end of these minutes.***
** The Mayor, Councillor Byrne made a declaration later in the meeting in relation to Item 37 - Contributions and Reimbursements.
**Councillor Carlisle made a declaration later in the meeting in relation to Item 37 - Contributions and Reimbursements.
Motion: (Scott/Clay)
That Council note the disclosures of interest.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
|
That the Minutes of the Council held on Tuesday, 29 April 2025 be confirmed as a correct record. Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
PUBLIC FORUM
The registered speakers were asked to address the meeting. The list of speakers is available on the last page of these minutes.
The Mayor, Councillor Byrne left the meeting at 7:18pm and vacated the Chair. The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Howard, assumed the Chair.
Councillor Scott left the meeting at 7:22pm
Councillor Barlow left the meeting at 7:24pm
Councillor Barlow returned to the meeting at 7:27pm
The Mayor, Councillor Byrne returned to the meeting at 7:27pm. The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Howard, vacated the Chair and the Mayor, Councillor Byrne, assumed the Chair.
Councillor Clay left the meeting at 7:28pm
Councillor Clay returned to the meeting at 7:31pm
Councillor Antoniou left the meeting at 7:37pm
Councillor Scott returned to the meeting at 7:37pm
Councillor Raciti left the meeting at 7:37pm
Councillor Antoniou returned to the meeting at 7:39pm
The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Howard wished to note the passing of Brother Paul Conn who was the Principal of Christian Brothers’ Lewisham and it is his intention to bring a Condolence motion to the next Council meeting.
Councillor Raciti returned to the meeting at 7:50pm
Procedural Motion (Howard/Atkins)
That Council Suspend Standing Orders to bring forward the following items to be dealt with at this time:
1. Item 5 Quarter Three - Progress Report on the Delivery Program 2022- 26 and Operational Plan 2024/25 and Quarterly Budget Review Statement
2. Item 6 Bill Smoothing - Updated Recommendation
3. Item 7 Hygienic Disposal in Men's Toilets
4. Item 9 RFT 41-24 Insurance Services - Addendum
5. Item 10 Review of Opportunities for EV Public Charging in Tempe Reserve and Balmain Depot - Addendum
6. Item 11 Review of Opportunities for EV Public Charging in Tempe Reserve and Balmain Depot
7. Item 12 Investment Report at 30 April 2025
8. Item 13 Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Upgrade - Monthly Project Update
9. Item 14 Leichhardt Oval Refurbishment - Monthly Project Update
10. Item 20 Transfer of goods to remote Indigenous communities
11. Item 22 2024-2025 Updated Annual Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest Returns
12. Item 23 Notice of Motion: Driveway exit safety at Ara (141-143 Allen St and 220-224 Flood St, Leichhardt)
13. Item 24 Notice of Motion: Annandale Police Station: update and parking needs
14. Item 26 Notice of Motion: Inner West Pride Walk
15. Item 27 Notice of Motion: Eliminating Produce Stickers, Microplastics and FOGO Contaminants
16. Item 28 Notice of Motion: Cooks River fishing signage and disposal bins
17. Item 29 Notice of Motion: Gannon Street Pedestrian Crossing
18. Item 30 Notice of Motion: Calvert Street Carpark Plug and Play Events
19. Item 31 Notice of Motion: Supporting Solar Uptake as Part of the DCP
20. Item 32 Notice of Motion: Petersham Park – Nappy Change Table Facilities
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Procedural Motion (Howard/Atkins)
That the following items be moved in globo and the recommendations contained within the report be adopted:
1. Item 5 Quarter Three - Progress Report on the Delivery Program 2022- 26 and Operational Plan 2024/25 and Quarterly Budget Review Statement
2. Item 6 Bill Smoothing - Updated Recommendation
3. Item 7 Hygienic Disposal in Men's Toilets
4. Item 9 RFT 41-24 Insurance Services - Addendum
5. Item 10 Review of Opportunities for EV Public Charging in Tempe Reserve and Balmain Depot - Addendum
6. Item 11 Review of Opportunities for EV Public Charging in Tempe Reserve and Balmain Depot
7. Item 12 Investment Report at 30 April 2025
8. Item 13 Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Upgrade - Monthly Project Update
9. Item 14 Leichhardt Oval Refurbishment - Monthly Project Update
10. Item 20 Transfer of goods to remote Indigenous communities
11. Item 22 2024-2025 Updated Annual Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest Returns
12. Item 23 Notice of Motion: Driveway exit safety at Ara (141-143 Allen St and 220-224 Flood St, Leichhardt)
13. Item 24 Notice of Motion: Annandale Police Station: update and parking needs
14. Item 26 Notice of Motion: Inner West Pride Walk
15. Item 27 Notice of Motion: Eliminating Produce Stickers, Microplastics and FOGO Contaminants
16. Item 28 Notice of Motion: Cooks River fishing signage and disposal bins
17. Item 29 Notice of Motion: Gannon Street Pedestrian Crossing
18. Item 30 Notice of Motion: Calvert Street Carpark Plug and Play Events
19. Item 31 Notice of Motion: Supporting Solar Uptake as Part of the DCP
20. Item 32 Notice of Motion: Petersham Park – Nappy Change Table Facilities
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
|
That Council introduces Bill Smoothing as an option for rate payers for 2025/26 Financial Year.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
|
That Council endorse the installation of men’s hygienic bins within Aquatic Centres and Libraries across the Inner West as detailed in this report for a 12 month trial.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
|
1. That Council considers RFT41-24 Insurance Services at Item 34 at the 20 May 2025 Council meeting, and not at the 17 June 2025 Council meeting.
2. That Council undertakes an external service review in the 2025/2026 Financial Year into the insurance claims customer experience and receives a report back on the outcome of that service review.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
|
That Council receive and note the report.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
|
1. That in the definition of ‘Property Developer’, add the following as a new (b) and renumber: a) an individual or a corporation that carries on a business mainly concerned with a residential or commercial development of land, with the ultimate purpose of the sale or lease of the land for profit, as defined by section 53(1)(a)(I) of the Electoral Funding Act; and b) any other party proposing a development which would be subject of a decision by resolution of Council and/or the Sydney Eastern Planning Panel.
2.
That Council insert a new section 5.1 c) and renumber, which
states that:
3. That Council delete section 5.3 and replace with: A Councillor is not required to complete a Lobbying Record Form in respect of any interactions with Registered Lobbyists or Property Developers: a) at events, social and public functions where no substantial interactions took place (unless the interaction leads to a substantive discussion of values); b) in respect of any interaction with a Registered Lobbying or Property Developer, where: i. That Councillor has previously disclosed a pre-existing relationship with that Registered Lobbyist or Property Developer through Council’s written returns of interest processes; and ii. The interaction is not held in a Councillor’s capacity as an Inner West Councillor, and/or does not directly relate to matters involving Inner West Council; and
c) in respect of any interaction that is not held in a Councillor’s capacity as an Inner West Councillor, and/or does not directly relate to matters involving Inner West Council.
4. That following the conclusion of the exhibition period, the draft Lobbying Policy be brought back to Council for consideration for adoption.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
Procedural Motion (Byrne/Howard)
That the meeting be adjourned for 3 minutes.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
The meeting was adjourned at 8:07pm
The meeting resumed at 8:14pm
Procedural Motion (Byrne/Howard)
That Council allow Clr D’Arienzo to speak for 3 additional minutes on Item 2.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Procedural Motion (Barlow/Howard)
That Council allow Clr Antoniou to speak for 2 additional minutes on Item 2.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Procedural Motion (Smith/Scott)
That Council allow Clr Howard to speak for 1 additional minute on Item 2.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
The Mayor, Councillor Byrne, returned to the meeting at 8:46pm. The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Howard vacated the Chair and the Mayor, Councillor Byrne, assumed the Chair.
Procedural Motion (Byrne/D’Arienzo)
That Council allow Clr Smith to speak for 2 additional minutes on Item 3.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
|
1. That Council adopt the Urban Forest Policy subject to: a) inclusion of the following item in the Strategic Action Plan: Develop plain language material informing residents about the options, processes, and response times relating to pruning and removal of trees, to be letterboxed to all households and provided at Council service centres, customer service stalls, and the Inner West Sustainability Hub; b) inclusion of tree canopy measures and planting targets in the Policy; c) increase of the minimum notification period for removal to 14 days; d) requirement for annual urban forest monitoring reports to Council; and e) the Strategic Action Plan be expanded to clearly identify the resourcing, timelines, and responsible Council units for delivering each action.
2. That Council update the Policy Register and publish, as applicable, internally and externally the adopted Urban Forest Policy.
3. That Council undertake a review of the Policy in 12 months’ time to assess its application, with a report back to Council.
4. That Council note Council’s adopted target of 1,000 new street trees planted per year, with almost 700 new trees planted so far in 2025, and the establishment of micro-forests in every ward, and reaffirm Council’s commitment to protecting and expanding our urban tree canopy, including prioritising new planting along urban roads, town centres, and adjacent to play spaces.
5. That Council receive a report on opportunities to improve maintenance and pruning of street trees, including a review of pruning schedules and customer service responsiveness.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
|
1. That Council endorse the criteria describing significant residential development for items to be considered by the new Inner West Residential Panel as development applications or modifications that have: a) 5 or more residential dwellings; b) boarding houses; c) co living; or d) subdivision for residential development that would result in new housing
2. That the new Panel report to Council on the outcomes of panel reviews and progress of housing delivery on a quarterly basis.
3. That Council creates a dashboard reporting tool to track new housing supply in the Inner West and progress against our housing targets. That data is collected from the commencement of the new ‘Fairer Future in the Inner West’ plan and progress is reported in the quarterly reports to Council.
4. That Council undertake a review of the Terms of Reference in 12 months’ time to evaluate its effectiveness, with a report back to Council.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
Procedural Motion (Howard/Byrne)
That Council allow Clr Smith to speak for 1 additional minute on Item 16.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Procedural Motion (Byrne/Howard)
That Council allow Clr Smith to speak for 1 additional minute on Item 16.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
|
1. That Council receive and note the report.
2. That Council maintain the increased service level in the identified laneways as was undertaken during the trial.
3. That Council undertake and receive a report back on a replicated six-month trial in laneways adjacent to other main streets that have been identified as future Special Entertainment Precincts, including: a) Darling St, Balmain-Rozelle, b) Marrickville Rd and New Canterbury Rd, Dulwich Hill, c) Norton St, Leichhardt, d) Victoria Rd and Addison Rd, Marrickville, e) Marrickville Town Centre, and f) South King St, Newtown.
4. That Council include assessment of waste storage as part of annual inspections of all medium and high risk food businesses and continue undertaking both education of and regulatory action against non-compliant businesses.
5. That Council pending approvals with Ausgrid, install additional lighting in areas of the laneways identified as having deficient lighting, with funding identified as part of the next quarterly budget review.
6. That Council continue letterbox drops of surrounding multi-unit dwellings at six-monthly intervals with information about the free Council clean-up service and the HomeCycle doorstop service.
7. That Council write to all adjacent households and businesses informing them of the maintenance of increased service levels, including street cleaning and inspections, and plans for installation of additional lighting once confirmed.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
Councillor Raciti left the meeting at 9:11pm
Procedural Motion (Scott/Howard)
That Council enter into Confidential session.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Absent: Cr Raciti
Councillor Raciti returned to the meeting at 9:17pm
Procedural Motion (Byrne/Atkins)
That Council move back into the Open Session of the Council meeting.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Confidential Session
That in accordance with Section 10A(1) of the Local Government Act 1993, the following matters be considered in Closed Session of Council for the reasons provided:
C0525(1) Item 34 RFT 41-24 Insurance Services (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
C0525(1) Item 35 RFT 04-25 Mackey Park Amenities Construction (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
C0525(1) Item 36 RFT 09-24 Print and Associated Services Tender Evaluation Report (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
C0525(1) Item 37 Contributions And Reimbursements (Section 10A(2)(g) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege.
resolutions passed during closed session
|
1. That Council determines, pursuant to section 55(3)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 that a satisfactory result would not be achieved by openly inviting tenders for the provision of insurance services due to the following extenuating circumstances: a) The local government sector is predominantly insured via mutual insurance providers as opposed to the commercial insurance market; b) There are only two mutual insurance providers servicing the New South Wales local government sector; c) Council wishes to remain with a mutual insurance provider; and d) There would be no better outcome by proceeding to open tender given the desire of Council to remain with a mutual insurance arrangement.
2. That Council determines JLT Risk Solutions Pty Ltd ABN 69009098864 as scheme manager for Statewide Mutual, as its commercial policies of insurance services provider.
3. That Council determines the term of the contract for Council’s commercial policies of insurance to be from 1 July 2025 to the period ending 30 June 2031.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
|
C0525(1) Item 35 RFT 04-25 Mackey Park Amenities Construction |
|
1. That Council accepts Andrik Construction Group Pty Ltd’s tender submission for RFT 04-25 Mackey Park Amenities Construction for the lump sum price of $1,552,680 (ex GST) or $1,707,948 (inc GST).
2. That Council approves the contingency amount as stated in the Confidential report: RFT 04-25 Mackey Park Amenities Construction provided to Council at the Ordinary Council meeting on 20 May 2025.
3. That Council delegates authority to the General Manager to execute an agreement with Andrik Construction Group Pty Ltd at the value of the approved lump sum.
4. That Council delegates authority to the General Manager, or their delegate, to execute any number of variations to the agreement with Andrik Construction Group Pty Ltd up to the total value of the contingency amount as stated in the Confidential report: RFT 04-25 Mackey Park Amenities Construction provided to Council at the Ordinary Council meeting on 20 May 2025.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil |
Councillor Blake left the meeting at 9:25pm as he declared a non-significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 36 as he has worked with many of the tenderers.
Councillor Blake returned to the meeting at 9:26pm
DISCLOSURES OF INTEREST:
The Mayor, Councillor Byrne declared a significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 37 - Contributions and Reimbursements, as he knows a person listed to receive a reimbursement within the report. He will leave the meeting during voting and discussion on the matter.
Councillor Carlisle declared a significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 37 - Contributions and Reimbursements, as a person who is owed money by Council is a member of her local Australian Labor Party Branch. She will leave the meeting during voting and discussion on the matter.
Procedural Motion (D’Arienzo/Howard)
That Council note the disclosures of interest from the Mayor, Councillor Byrne and Councillor Carlisle.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
The Mayor, Councillor Byrne left the meeting at 9:29pm and vacated the Chair as he declared a significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 37. The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Howard assumed the Chair.
Councillor Carlisle left the meeting at 9:29pm as she declared a significant, non-pecuniary interest in Item 37.
|
That this item be deferred.
Motion Carried For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan Against Motion: Nil Absent: Crs Byrne and Carlisle |
The Mayor, Councillor Byrne returned to the meeting at 9:30pm. The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Howard, vacated the Chair and the Mayor, Councillor Byrne assumed the Chair.
Councillor Carlisle returned to the meeting at 9:30pm
Procedural Motion (Blake/Barlow)
That Council consider an urgency motion on Racism towards First Nations Peoples in the Inner West at this Council meeting.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
The Chairperson ruled this matter urgent.
Motion: (Blake/Scott)
1. That Council condemns the recent incidents of racist graffiti at Boomalli Aboriginal Artists Co-operative.
2. That Council acknowledges that racism must be opposed in all its forms, that there has been an increase in racism in our community, including towards Indigenous Australians during the Voice referendum, and that racism directed at one community has the potential to harm all diverse communities.
3. That Council notes the steps already taken by Council to combat racism, and support community cohesion, including the recent Mayoral Roundtable on Social Cohesion that Inner West Council co-hosted; the recently released Anti-Racism Strategy, the first developed by a local council in NSW; and recent actions adopted via Mayoral Minute at the 18 February 2025 Council meeting, including a briefing for all councillors with the local Police Area Command and with Multicultural NSW on how Council can support community safety and cohesion at the local level, investment in community ethnic organisations, the completion of three Indigenous Survival Memorials, customised Anti-Racism Training, and support for greater economic participation for people from diverse backgrounds or Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
4. That Council hold an additional urgent meeting with the Boomalli Aboriginal Artists Co-operative, in collaboration with Council’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Local Democracy Group, to discuss how Council can best support their community safety concerns.
Motion Carried
For Motion: Crs Antoniou, Atkins, Barlow, Blake, Byrne, Carlisle, Clay, D'Arienzo, Fergusson, Howard, Macri, Raciti, Scott, Smith and Tastan
Against Motion: Nil
Meeting closed at 9.34pm
Public Speakers:
|
Item #
|
Speaker |
Suburb |
|
Item 2: |
Justin Simon Dan Conway Paul Mortimer Philip Bull Evan Mistilis Amanda Bailey Tom Watson Daniel Buckmaster |
Summer Hill Marrickville Marrickville Marrickville Ashfield Bella Vista Dulwich Hill Ashfield |
|
Item 3: |
Tim Luckett Ann Markham Bill Mavrodis Colgan Darton Rene Holmes |
Enmore Marrickville Dulwich Hill Enmore Ashfield |
|
Item 8: |
Naomi Dale Wilson |
Leichhardt |
|
Item 18: |
Tim Hand Keith Stallard |
Balmain Balmain |
|
Item 26: |
Rod Saye |
Ashfield |
Unconfirmed Minutes of Ordinary Council meeting held on 20 May 2025.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Condolence Motion: Dr Peter Bokor
From: Councillor Victor Macri
|
MOTION
2. That Council write to the family thanking them for their father’s service to the community over such a long period of time.
3. That Council considers a memorial tree planting in a local park, in consultation with the family.
|
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Draft Economic Development Budget 2025-26
Prepared By: Daniel East - Senior Manager Strategic Planning
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council supports modifying the draft economic development budget to establish an annual grant program to support Inner West Business Chambers / Networks / Associations. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
3: Creative communities and a strong economy |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report provides an overview of the existing draft 2025/2026 economic development budget and proposes a key change to support the establishment of an annual grant program for local business chambers / networks / associations.
The report also outlines the professional support provided by the Economic Development Team to various projects and programs of both Council and local business.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 29 April 2025, Council resolved the following:
1). Refer the matter to the General Manager to return a revised report on the Economic Development Budget to the May 2025 Council meeting including:
a) a revised proposal that includes a competitive grant process open to all business groups from the 2026 financial year, and retaining existing allocations to the Marrickville Chamber of Commerce for the 2025-2026 financial year; and
b) options to grow the amount available for grants.
2). That the grants process be run in the same manner as the current grant process
DISCUSSION
A revised economic budget has been prepared, which includes retaining the funds for Marrickville Chamber for 2025-2026. A competitive grant process has been developed in consultation with the Small Business Local Democracy Group (LDG).
The draft 2025/2026 economic development budget focuses on activities that grow the skills and capacity of local businesses. Some activities include;
· Marketing campaigns
· Place making activations
· Engagement with Council processes including development assessment and compliance
· Delivery of business networking and workshops
· Support for business chambers and the creative arts sector
· Advocate for enhanced transport options and implementing active transport solutions
· Support for the late-night economy
The table featured below outlines planned expenditure;
Draft Budget 2025/2026 Economic Development
|
Project |
Activity Description |
Budget Amount |
|
Competitive Grant for Chambers. |
Grant program for Chambers that aligns to Council’s grant procedures. |
$220,000 |
|
Marrickville Chamber* |
Retaining existing allocation |
$67,500 |
|
Inner West Creative Network* |
Council Resolution to support the network assisting local creatives |
$25,000 |
|
Public domain beautification |
Flags / Banners / Bin skins / fairy lights / laneways / shop front decals (for long term vacant premises) |
$225,840 |
|
Tourism Strategy |
Implement tourism actions |
$200,000 |
|
On road dining - Concrete Barriers |
Continue to deliver opportunities for businesses to use approved roads for outdoor dining. |
$50,000 |
|
Small campaigns and business awards |
Projects that support sector growth: Inner West Distillery trail Online campaigns Business plaques (business operating 25 years or more) Small festival grants |
$45,350 |
|
Women in Business Network |
Continue to support the successful Women in Business
network. |
$25,000 |
|
Economic Development Strategic Plan |
To assist with implementing actions in the plan. |
$25,000 |
|
Implement specific strategies state government projects |
For example, re-accreditation of Purple Flag, Neon Market Place, Up Town, RAP, Disability Action Plan |
$21,086 |
|
Total |
|
$904,776 |
Additional Funding Trial
Council has three positions within the economic development team and currently has two vacancies
If Council was of a mind to increase the grant funded program by reducing the staff establishment using one vacant staff position this will provide an extra $130,000 to the budget taking the grant program to $350,000. This could be done as a trial whilst the Team Leader of Economic Development is recruited, and they review the timing to implement the actions in the proposed in the Economic Development Strategy. The economic development budget could also form part of the budget discussion as part of the 26/27 budget
Competitive Grant Process – “The Chambers and Business Associations Grant”
Staff have developed in consultation with the Small Business Local Democracy Group, a competitive grant for Chambers and Business associations as outlined below.
Introduction
Economic development is delivered through a partnership with Council, other levels of government and more importantly with the support and engagement of local businesses chambers and industry groups. To better support economic growth Council is offering a competitive grant program where chambers and business associations can apply for funding once a year. This Program will empower chambers and to take ownership and lead the direction of business activities that target the unique characteristic of their business precincts and better support local economic growth.
Aim:
The Chambers and Business Associations Grant Program aims to strengthen the local economy by showcasing the sought after lifestyle and cultural advantages of the Inner West as a place to shop, live, work, explore and do business. The program aims to build business capacity and industry knowledge.
Eligibility Criteria:
Eligibility is restricted to Chambers and business associations who are set up as a legal entity within the Inner West LGA, have 30 members and have been operating for a minimum 12 months. Chambers and associations that received funds under the Urban Centres Program or have a direct grant allocation to support the operation of the Chamber / Association (as asterisk above) are not eligible under this criteria. Individual businesses are also not eligible because support is for projects that promote a whole precinct or business area and tourism sectors.
Eligible Projects:
The program activities should aim to create a ’destination story’ to invite the audience to “visit, shop, play & explore” what’s on offer in the area. Funds are for the sole purpose of being used in centres and villages to promote, brand, and activate business zones and build business capacity. This could include:
· cluster development initiatives
· engagement of admin support to implement projects
· social media or marketing campaigns to attract visitors
· special events to encourage out of area customer spend
· capacity building through business workshops and networking
· activities that aligns with Council’s economic development strategies
Funding is not guaranteed, and all requests will be assessed against program criteria.
Application Process
Chambers and Businesses Associations would apply annually for funding through Council’s Annual Grant Program using the Smarty Grant Process. A selection panel would be established to assess applications which will include an independent panel member. Eg. State Government or neighbouring Council representative.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There is $904,776 in the draft 25/26 budget for projects within economic development. The table within the report has $220,000 of this allocated to a competitive grant program for chambers and business associations.
Council has three positions within the economic development team and currently has two vacancies
If council was of a mind to increase the grant funded program by reducing the staff establishment using one vacant staff position this will provide an extra $130,000 to the budget taking the grant program to $350,000. This could be done as a trial whilst the Team Leader of Economic Development is recruited and they review the timing to implement the actions in the proposed in the Economic Development Strategy. The economic development budget could also form part of the budget discussion as part of the 26/27 budget.
In addition to the allocation budget, Council staff will continue to actively encourage chambers and business associations for State Government Funding Grants including Uptown of which in the last funding round five business groups were successful. This funding will complement the existing Council support.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Public Exhibition - Draft Economic Development Strategy
Council at its meeting on 29 April 2025 resolved that the matter be deferred.
Prepared By: Daniel East - Senior Manager Strategic Planning
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council publicly exhibit the draft Economic Development Strategy for a period of 28 days and seek community feedback on the proposed Strategy.
2. That following the conclusion of the exhibition period, the draft Economic Development Strategy be brought back to Council for consideration for adoption.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
3: Creative communities and a strong economy |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Inner West Economic Development Strategy 2025-2030 outlines the key economic strategic drivers for the Inner West and the actions Council will take to boost economic growth in the Inner West. The Strategy has been developed in collaboration with local business chambers, sector associations, businesses, key industry groups, community members and stakeholders. The principle of ensuring as many community members benefit from a more inclusive economy otherwise known as Community Wealth Building has been instilled into the Strategy.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 13 September 2022, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council commits to becoming Australia’s leading Community Wealth Building council by adopting the pillars of Community Wealth Building into our Inner West Council Economic Development Strategy;
2. That in preparation for the Economic Development Strategy:
a) Staff consult with the Democracy Collaborative on the pillars of Community Wealth Building before the end of 2022; and
b) Identify local anchor institutions such as universities and TAFE, hospitals, schools, sporting clubs, community and First Nations organisations and large local employers and businesses to be part of the development of the Economic Development Strategy, in addition to residents and other stakeholders.
3. That Council holds an Inner West Economic Summit early in 2023, and includes those local anchor institutions, in addition to residents and other stakeholders, to discuss people-centered economic development.
To inform the creation of the Economic Development Strategy, Council hosted two Inner West Economic Summits, a multicultural roundtable and a Your Say Page as part of the consultation process with stakeholders. The summits brought together in total over 137 attendees representing local business owners attended. Other consultations included businesses, local anchor institutions, Bendigo Bank, job network providers, large employers, TAFE, Investment NSW, local manufacturers, universities, creative sector and local business chambers. The Your Say Page received 114 visitors to the page.
From feedback received the main priority areas raised were to:
· Promote and market the businesses offerings in LGA to support for foot traffic
· Enhance the main streets including the built environment and activations
· Improve Council processes including DA times and Compliance
· Provide business support through networking and workshops
· Help businesses overcome impediments and challenges
· Support for business chambers and the creative arts sector
· Enhance Transport options to town centres including active transport
· Community safety in relation to encouraging the late-night economy
In addition, SGS Economics and Planning were engaged to provide a clearer understanding of how to embed the principles of community wealth building into a new Economic Development Strategy within the Inner West context. The following pillars have formed an overarching principle in the development of the strategy:
· Progressive procurement of goods and services;
· Fair employment and just labour markets;
· Socially productive use of land and property;
· Marking financial power work for local places; and
· Plural ownership of the economy.
To develop the strategy, data and research relating to the Inner West economic profile was analysed to identify both opportunities and challenges to growing and supporting the local economy. The data relied upon was sourced from Economy.id, Population Census data, ATO income data, Centrelink and Labour Force Survey data.
DISCUSSION
The draft document has a range of goals and actions that have been prioritised to ensure the best possible outcomes are achieved for the LGA over the next five years.
The draft Strategy is structured around 5 Key Strategic Directions as follows:
1. Leverage existing competitive advantages of the Inner West
2. Create people-centric places supported by integrated infrastructure
3. Foster a productive and resilient economy
4. Embrace opportunity, ideas and innovation
5. Promote a green, sustainable and circular economy
A series of goals sit under each of the Key Directions, with actions highlighting how those goals will be achieved. Every action in the plan has a council officer and a timeline for delivery nominated against it.
Should the Strategy be endorsed for further community consultation, it will include:
· 'Your Say Inner West’ page with an online survey
· Flyer to local businesses
· Drop in sessions for businesses and community in Councils libraries during the week, evenings and weekend
· Engagement and consultation with the Local Democracy Groups
· Specific meetings with business chambers and business associations
· Social media posts
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report. Where specific projects arise from the Strategy, these will be programmed and costed into the relevant budget.
|
1.⇩ |
Draft Economic Development Strategy 2025-2030 |
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Investment Policy Update
Council at its meeting on 29 April 2025 resolved that the matter be deferred to the meeting to be held on 17 June 2025.
Prepared By: Sajjad Ali - Acting Chief Financial Officer
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council adopts the draft Investment Policy, as attached to the report.
2. That Council places the adopted Investment Policy on public exhibition for a period of 28 days, and provide a report back to Council if Council receives any feedback that requires an amendment to the adopted Investment Policy.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive, and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Council’s Investment Policy outlines how Council will invest funds at the most favourable return available, while also considering risk and security for that investment type, and ensuring its liquidity requirements are met.
The Investment Policy Guidelines produced by the Office of Local Government (OLG) pursuant to section 23A of the Local Government Act 1993 (Act) require Council to review its Investment Policy at least on annual basis, and amend it as required.
Following a review of the Investment Policy, Officers propose amending the draft Investment Policy by defining cash and investments, replacing the Ethical Investment section with a new Environmentally and Socially Responsible Investments section, and amending the Credit and Maturity Guidelines.
Officers recommend that Council adopts the draft Investment Policy, agrees to place the Investment Policy on public exhibition for a period of 28 days, and receives a report back only if receives any feedback that necessitates an amendment to the adopted Investment Policy.
BACKGROUND
Section 8 of the Act outlines principles of sound financial management with which councils must comply. To comply with these principles, Council has in place a range of policies including the Investment Policy, which provides a framework for Council to invest its funds at the most favourable return with due consideration of risk, security and liquidity requirements.
Council is required to review its Investment Policy on at least annual basis, in order to comply with the OLG’s Investment Policy Guidelines, which were issued in May 2010.
DISCUSSION
Proposed addition of Cash and Investment definitions
Council proposes to include definitions for Cash and Investment as follows:
|
Cash |
Cash comprises: |
|
Investment |
Investments comprise term/tailored deposits (terminology varies by institution) bonds with an active secondary market with government (including NSW T-Corp and other government treasury bodies) and Authorised Deposit-taking Institutions (ADIs).
Investment assets have maturities at the time of placement of 3 months or more. |
Proposed change to “Ethical Investment” section
Council proposes to replace the “Ethical Investment” section of the Investment Policy, with a new section entitled “Environmentally and Socially Responsible Investments”. The new section will set out Council’s commitment to investing only in environmentally, ethically and socially responsible investments (SRI), and the criteria for Council’s investment. This new section will also set out the types of environmentally and socially harmful activities in which Council will not invest.
Credit and Maturity Guidelines
Proposed Changes to Portfolio Credit Framework
To control the credit quality on the entire portfolio, the
following credit framework limits the percentage of the portfolio exposed to
any credit rating category.
As of March 2025, Council holds 16.39% of the portfolio in BBB+,BBB category. Increasing
the percent from 20% to 30% will increase Council’s ability to take
better advantage of attractive opportunities from several non-fossil fuel
lending authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs).
|
Long Term Credit Ratings |
Portfolio Max % |
|
AAA, AA+, AA, AA- |
100% |
|
A+, A, A- |
70% |
|
BBB+, BBB |
|
|
BBB- and lower & Unrated (excluding NSW TCorpIM Funds) |
0% |
|
Specific Ministerial Approved Forms of Investment |
Portfolio Max % |
|
NSW TcorpIM Funds |
20% |
Proposed changes to Institutional Credit Framework
Council’s exposure to be an individual institution is restricted by the institution’s credit rating, with the exception of the NSW TcorpIM Funds which do not have credit ratings. Increasing the upper limits will provide Council a wider choice of investment options in the A- and BBB space. This also reduces the situations when investment maturities can create breaches of these upper limits depending on which credit rating has matured.
|
Long Term Credit Ratings |
Institution Max % |
|
AAA, AA+, AA, AA- |
50% |
|
A+, A, A- |
|
|
BBB+, BBB |
|
|
BBB- and lower & Unrated (excluding NSW TCorpIM Funds) |
0% |
|
NSW TCorp IM Funds |
Max% |
|
TCORPIM Short Term Income Fund |
20% |
Proposed changes to Overall Portfolio Term to Maturity Limits
Reducing the minimum Portfolio term to maturity limits i.e. ≤ 1 year Minimum from 40% to 30% will give Council the flexibility to consider longer term maturities in the 1 to 3 year horizons and 1 to 10 year horizons if there is a lower interest rate environment going forward. Council will be able to lock in higher rates of return over longer maturity time horizons.
|
Overall Portfolio Term to Maturity Limits |
Min % |
Max% |
|
Portfolio % ≤1 year |
|
100% |
|
Portfolio % >1 year ≤10 years |
0% |
60% |
|
Portfolio % > 3 years |
0% |
|
|
Portfolio % > 5 years ≤ 10 years |
0% |
|
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with placing the Investment Policy on public exhibition.
|
1.⇩ |
Investment Policy |
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Post Exhibition - Community Strategic Plan, Delivery Program 2025-29 and Operational Plan and Budget 2025/26, and Resourcing Strategy
Prepared By: Prue Foreman - Corporate Strategy and Engagement Manager
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council receive and note the outcomes of the public exhibition of key integrated plans: a) Draft Community Strategic Plan 2041 b) Draft Delivery Program 2025-29, Operational Plan and Budget 2025/26 (including Fees and Charges 2025/26) c) Draft Long Term Financial Plan 2025-35
2. That Council endorse: a) Draft Community Strategic Plan 2041 b) Draft Workforce Management Strategy 2025-29
3. That Council adopt: a) Draft Delivery Program 2025-29 and Operational Plan and Budget 2025/26 b) Draft Long Term Financial Plan 2025-35 (scenario 1) c)
Draft Asset Management Strategy
2025-35, Draft Asset Management Policy and Draft Asset Management Plans 4. That Council note the updated package of Service Statements which include Delivery Program principal activities, Operational Plan actions and KPIs, levels of service where relevant and budget for every service; and
5. That Council publish the final documents on its corporate website by 30 June 2025 and notify the Office of Local Government of the link to its web page.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Under the NSW Local Government Act, councils are required to develop a suite of plans as part of the Integrated Planning and Reporting Framework (IP&R). IP&R is a rigorous and consistent system of community planning across all NSW local councils which also takes into consideration state and regional priorities. IP&R assists councils in delivering their community’s vision through long, medium and short term plans.
Inner West’s key IP&R documents were developed following community engagement, Local Democracy Groups engagement, councillor priorities workshops and staff engagement.
Three components of the suite
were publicly exhibited for community comment as required by the Act, following
Council’s endorsement at its April 2025 meeting:
· Community Strategic Plan (CSP), Our Inner West 2041, identifies the community’s vision for the future, long term outcomes, and strategies to get there. Although Council takes the lead in developing the plan on behalf of the community, many partners are required to achieve the vision. The CSP is reviewed after every council election.
The revised CSP includes a refreshed community vision statement, five strategic directions (unchanged from previous CSP), 18 outcomes and 43 strategies (high level actions). Progress will be monitored through 90 indicators, including several new indicators responding to improved data availability.
· Delivery Program 2025-29 outlines the elected Council’s commitment to achieving the outcomes and strategies of the CSP and delivering all of Council’s functions during its term of office. The Delivery Program is combined with the one-year Operational Plan 2025/26 which contains detailed actions and performance measures for the year, the Statement of Revenue Policy and annual budget. The combined Delivery Program/Operational Plan is reviewed and updated annually.
· Long Term Financial Plan 2025-35 which is part of the Resourcing Strategy – sets out the ten year budget forecast, underlying assumptions, sensitivity analysis, financial modelling for possible scenarios and methods of monitoring financial performance. The Long Term Financial Plan is reviewed and updated annually.
This Council report details the public exhibition process, the 19 community submissions received during the public exhibition and officer responses. No substantive changes to the plans are proposed as a result of the public exhibition, however minor amendments to some targets, statutory changes to some fees and charges, and updates for clarity or to correct minor errors in the drafts are outlined in the report.
The report also presents the two
remaining components of the Resourcing Strategy to Council for approval. These
documents, which are not required to be publicly exhibited, include:
· Asset Management Strategy 2025-35, Asset Management Policy and Asset Management Plans
The Asset Management Strategy 2025-35 provides a comprehensive overview of how Council intends to manage its infrastructure assets over the next 10 years to ensure the sustainable delivery of services to the community. It outlines the current state of assets, identifies key risks and challenges, and sets out the financial and operational strategies required to maintain and improve Council’s asset base. The Asset Management Strategy, along with the Policy and four detailed Asset Management Plans are outlined in the report.
· Workforce Management Strategy 2025-29
The Workforce Management Strategy 2025-29 provides a comprehensive overview of how Council intends to manage its workforce over the next 4 years. It incorporates
three frameworks and four strategic focus areas that together provide a structure for addressing resource-related challenges, driving proactive decision-making, and ensuring a comprehensive approach to workforce management.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 29 April 2025 meeting, Council resolved the following in part:
1. That Council amend the 2025/2026 Budget to limit any increase to the domestic waste levy to 7.5% in the 2025/2026 financial year.
2. That Council endorse for public exhibition of 28 days the:
a) Draft Community Strategic Plan – Our Inner West 2041;
b) Draft Delivery Program 2025-29 and Operational Plan;
c) Budget 2025/26 (including Fees and Charges 2025/26, subject to the removal of fees and charges for activity and footpath usage applications for Footpath Dining Assessment (Roads Act 1993), Footpath Dining Annual Lease (Roads Act 1993), Onroad Dining Assessment (Roads Act 1993), Onroad Dining Lease (Roads Act 1993), with consequential changes to be made to the Fees and Charges 2025/26 Changes Log); and
d) Draft Long Term Financial Plan 2025-35.
3. That Council receive a report of the public exhibition outcomes and the final draft plans for adoption at the June 2025 Council meeting.
DISCUSSION
Under the NSW Local Government Act, councils are required to develop a suite of plans as part of the Integrated Planning and Reporting Framework (IP&R). IP&R is a rigorous and consistent system of community planning across all NSW local councils which also takes into consideration state and regional priorities. IP&R assists councils in delivering their community’s vision through long, medium and short term plans.
Council is required to review its IP&R documents in full after each election. The revised plans which are required to be adopted/endorsed by 30 June 2025 include the Community Strategic Plan, Delivery Program, Operational Plan (and Budget), and the Resourcing Strategy components – the Long Term Financial Plan, Asset Management Strategy, Policy and Plans, and Workforce Management Plan.
Inner West’s key IP&R documents were reviewed following an extensive program of community engagement, Local Democracy Groups engagement, councillor priorities and budget workshops and staff engagement.
Public exhibition
Three components of the suite were publicly exhibited for community comment as required by the Act, following Council’s endorsement at its April 2025 meeting:
· Draft Community Strategic Plan (CSP), Our Inner West 2041
· Draft Delivery Program 2025-29 and Operational Plan and Budget 2025/26 (including Fees and Charges)
· Long Term Financial Plan 2025-35
The public exhibition took place from Friday 2 May to Sunday 1 June. Documents were available online at Your Say Inner West, and at Council’s service centres and libraries. There were 19 submissions in total, including 13 by email and 6 through the Your Say Inner West website. Overall, 1,206 visits were made to the project page on Your Say Inner West.
The submissions reflected a broad range of opinions about the suite of documents. A key theme was the need for specific, time-bound targets particularly in active transport. Some submissions noted the lack of progress in building bike lanes and called for a significant increase in funding, staffing, and accountability to support active transport and mode shift away from cars. Other submissions focused on social sustainability, inclusivity, and environmental stewardship. Submissions called for stronger commitments to disability access and education, including infrastructure upgrades and sensory spaces at events. Some called for more ambitious targets for tree canopy growth and biodiversity.
Officers have provided detailed responses to each submission included in the attached document – Public exhibition submissions. Many areas of concern raised in the submissions such as the need for targets are addressed in Council’s supporting strategies including the Disability Inclusion Action Plan, Integrated Transport Strategy and Bicycle Plan as well as the Resilience/Wellbeing strategies and the Child and Youth Strategy that will be developed in this Council term.
Amendments to the draft plans
In response to the submissions, two indicators are proposed to be removed from the Community Strategic Plan and one added as outlined below. In addition, minor amendments for clarity or to correct minor errors in the drafts have been made. Minor updates to Fees and Charges have also been drafted. One additional Operational Plan action has been added as listed below.
· Draft Community Strategic Plan
o Removal from the list of Council supporting strategies that remain under development including: SD1- Climate Adaptation Plan, Urban Forest Strategy, SD2: Parking Strategy, SD3: Economic Development Strategy, SD4: Children and Youth Strategy, Wellbeing Strategy, Companion Animals Action Plan, SD5: Internal and External Communications Strategy
o Removal of 2 indicators in SD4: Needing help due to a disability” (target was to decrease), and Population with at least one long term health condition (target was to decrease)
o Inclusion of a
new indicator in SD2 - “People walking or cycling to work (4.5% ABS
Census 2021). Trend: Increase”. Source ABS Census Journey to Work
· Draft Delivery Program/Operational Plan – removal of duplications of principal activities and actions from the draft version.
One Operational Plan action was omitted from the public exhibition draft and has been added to the final draft presented to Council for adoption. This is:
4.2.3.7 Collaborate with Newtown Neighbourhood Centre to ensure the effective operation of the community centre
· Draft Fees and Charges
Since exhibition, there have been minor changes to Fees and Charges for the following reasons:
o Fees that are statutory in nature are updated by the relevant government body relating to development application fees.
o Rewording of fees that were incorrect to better reflect the fee.
o Corrected rounding of fees due to rounding errors.
A summary of changes made to specific Fees and Charges is provided in Attachment 4.
Approval
It is recommended that Council endorse/adopt the following draft plans. Council ‘endorses’ the Community Strategic Plan on behalf of the Inner West community (as many partners are required to deliver, Council is not wholly responsible). Council also ‘endorses’ rather than ‘adopts’ the Workforce Management Plan, as the General Manager is responsible for staffing. The remainder of documents are adopted by Council.
· Community Strategic Plan (CSP), Our Inner West 2041
The Community Strategic Plan identifies the community’s vision for the future, long term outcomes, and strategies to get there. Although Council takes the lead in developing the plan on behalf of the community, many partners are required to achieve the vision. The CSP is reviewed after every council election.
The
revised CSP includes a refreshed community vision statement, five strategic
directions (unchanged from previous CSP), 18 outcomes and 43 strategies (high
level actions). Progress will be monitored through 90 indicators, including
several new indicators responding to improved data availability.
· Delivery Program 2025-29 and Operational Plan and Budget 2025/26
The Delivery Program 2025-29 outlines the elected Council’s commitment to achieving the outcomes and strategies of the CSP and delivering all of Council’s functions during its term of office. The Delivery Program is combined with the one-year Operational Plan 2025/26 which contains detailed actions and performance measures for the year, the Statement of Revenue Policy and annual budget. The combined Delivery Program/Operational Plan is reviewed and updated annually.
The new Delivery Program and Operational Plan contains 106 Principal Activities, 172 actions and 136 KPIs. The 172 actions include 51 specific adopted Council priorities which will be operationalised and tracked throughout the term of Council. All actions, measures and priorities will be monitored through quarterly progress reports and annual reports to Council.
Section
three of the plan provides details about the draft budget and rating for 2025/26
to 2028/29. The draft Fees & Charges for 2025/26 is an appendix to the
plan. In 2025/26, Council is budgeting total income before capital grants and
contributions of $310.1m and expenses of $310.0m resulting in a surplus of $0.1m,
or 0.03% of total expenditure. In 2025/26, Council has budgeted $119.2m on
capital expenditure.
· Resourcing Strategy
The Resourcing Strategy is comprised of three components which together, show how Council will resource the provision its functions and implement the Community Strategic Plan strategies for which it has responsibility for. The three components are:
o Long Term Financial Planning
o Workforce Management Planning
o Asset Management Planning
The relevant documents for each of these components are described below.
· Long Term Financial Plan 2025-35
In accordance with IP&R guidelines, the Long Term Financial Plan includes:
o projected income and expenditure, balance sheet and cash flow statement
o planning assumptions
o sensitivity analysis, highlighting factors and assumptions most likely to impact the LTFP
o financial modelling for different scenarios
o methods of monitoring financial performance
o major capital and operational expenditure implications
The draft Long Term Financial Plan for 2025-35 sets out two scenarios in which each, at the very least, maintain current service levels and establish a balanced budget. These are:
o Scenario 1 – Business as Usual, maintain existing service levels: In this scenario, Council continues to operate at the existing service levels to the community and maintaining the capital works program to ensure infrastructure is renewed or upgraded over the 10 years. This scenario also ensures that Council is financial sustainable by ensuring there are funds available to deliver infrastructure and services to the community. Over the life of the LTFP, the surplus cumulate to be $15.0M.
o Scenario 2 – Addresses the Infrastructure Asset Renewal Backlog: In this alternative scenario, Council continues to provide its services to the community as per scenario 1 with the addition of a process to reduce the current infrastructure backlog of $29.3m from the 2023/24 financial statements over the course of the LTFP. The majority of the planned infrastructure spend is spread over the 10-year LTFP and results in this scenario showing that Council would be in a general funds deficit by 2026/27 financial year, so would require a loan of approximately $23.0M to cover the deficit.
Key highlights in the recommended scenario 1 LTFP include Council achieving a surplus for 10 years, and key performance indicators, including the Unrestricted Current Ratio, Debt Service Ratio and Infrastructure Backlog Ratio, all exceeding their performance benchmarks for the full ten years.
· Asset Management Strategy 2025-35, Asset Management Policy and Asset Management Plans
The Asset Management Strategy 2025-35 provides a comprehensive overview of how Council intends to manage its infrastructure assets over the next 10 years to ensure the sustainable delivery of services to the community. It outlines the current state of assets, identifies key risks and challenges, and sets out the financial and operational strategies required to maintain and improve Council’s asset base.
Inner West’s current asset management maturity is above ‘core’ level and Council is working towards a more advanced maturity. With the implementation of the Asset Management Improvement Actions outlined in each asset class plan, Council is confidently working towards achieving a target maturity score of 3 (Competent) which reflects Council’s commitment to strengthening its asset management capabilities and delivering more informed, efficient, and sustainable outcomes for the community. The Strategy contains a detailed Asset Management Improvement Plan to guide this work.
The Asset Management Strategy includes an Asset Management Policy which outlines Council’s purpose for planning and delivery of infrastructure services. It ensures that the Council has data, knowledge, systems, resources and processes that will enable long-term asset planning.
The Asset Management Strategy includes four detailed Asset Management Plans for the following asset classes:
o Transport
o Parks and Sporting Grounds
o Property
o Stormwater and Drainage
The purpose of the Asset Management Plans is to inform Council’s commitment to best practice asset management and provide principles for sound asset investment decision making in these four asset portfolios. They define the state of Council’s assets as at the 2025 Financial Year, the 10-year funding required to achieve Council’s adopted asset performance targets and planned asset management activities over a 10-year planning period.
These asset management documents are reviewed after every council election.
· Workforce Management Strategy 2025-29
The Workforce Management Strategy 2025-29 provides a comprehensive overview of how Council intends to manage its workforce over the next 4 years. It incorporates
three frameworks and four strategic focus areas that together provide a structure for addressing resource-related challenges, driving proactive decision-making, and ensuring a comprehensive approach to workforce management.
The three frameworks include:
o Australian Business Excellence Framework (ABEF): fosters a culture of continuous improvement, emphasising quality outcomes and staff empowerment, which are critical in driving performance
o Local Government Capability Framework: guides workforce development, equipping employees with the skills and capabilities required at Council
o 6B’s Resourcing Framework: guides resource management decisions and provides a structured approach to attracting, retaining, developing, and optimising resources through its 6 strategies: Build, Buy, Borrow, Bind, Bounce, Boost
The four strategic focus areas are:
1. Future-Proofing our Workforce: ensuring a future-ready workforce that is resilient, skilled, and capable of sustained performance
2. Attracting and Retaining Top Talent: focused on attracting and retaining top talent with the skills and capability to grow with Council
3. Fostering a Thriving Workplace: creating a safe, inclusive, and engaging work environment with effective systems and processes that support employee wellbeing and encourages high performance
4. Empowering Our People: Council invests in employee growth, inspires ownership, and accountability
The Workforce Management Strategy includes an actionable plan with clear objectives, outcomes, and measures to ensure successful implementation and ongoing effectiveness. The progress of this strategy will be reported to the Executive and the Audit Risk and Improvement Committee quarterly.
Service Statements
An updated package of Service Statements for Council’s 39 services is also attached for Council to note. Service Statements include a description of the service and its key activities, Delivery Program principal activities, Operational Plan actions and KPIs, levels of service where relevant and budget for every service.
The internal restructure from four to five Directors has impacted some of the reporting lines outlined in the Service Statements, which will necessitate minor updates once the new structure is finalised.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Council’s commitments in the Community Strategic Plan, Delivery Program and Operational Plan and Resourcing Strategy components are outlined in annual budgets and forecast in the Long Term Financial Plan.
Attachments 6-14 have been published separately in the Attachments Document on Council’s Website https://www.innerwest.nsw.gov.au/about/the-council/council-meetings/current-council-meetings
|
1.⇩ |
Draft Community Strategic Plan - Our Inner West 2041 |
|
2.⇩ |
Delivery Program 2025-29 (year one), Operational Plan 2025/26 and Budget |
|
3.⇩ |
Draft Fees and Charges 2025/26 |
|
4.⇩ |
Fees and Charges Change Log |
|
5.⇩ |
Draft Long Term Financial Plan 2025-35 |
|
6.⇩ |
Draft Workforce Management Strategy 2025-29 - Published Separately on Council’s website |
|
7.⇨ |
Draft Asset Management Strategy 2025-35 - Published Separately on Council’s website |
|
8.⇨ |
Draft Asset Management Policy - Published Separately on Council’s website |
|
9.⇨ |
Draft Parks and Sporting Grounds Asset Management Plan - Published Separately on Council’s website |
|
10.⇨ |
Draft Property Asset Management Plan - Published Separately on Council’s website |
|
11.⇨ |
Draft Stormwater Asset Management Plan - Published Separately on Council’s website |
|
12.⇨ |
Draft Transport Asset Management Plan - Published Separately on Council’s website |
|
13.⇨ |
Public exhibition submissions - Published Separately on Council’s website |
|
14.⇨ |
Service Statements 2025/26 - Published Separately on Council’s website |
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Post Exhibition - Special Entertainment Precincts Planning Proposal
Prepared By: Daniel East - Senior Manager Strategic Planning
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
|
1. That Council as local plan-making authority, endorse the amendments to the Inner West Local Environmental Plan 2022, Marrickville Development Control Plan 2011, Leichhardt Development Control Plan 2013 and Special Entertainment Precinct Management Plan to establish the six new Special Entertainment Precincts and extend the Enmore Road precinct.
2. That Council adopt the exhibited chapters of the Marrickville Development Control Plan 2011 and Leichhardt Development Control Plan 2013 and that they to come into effect on the same date as the Inner West Local Environmental Plan 2022 amendment is published on the Legislation NSW website.
3. That Council authorise the General Manager to finalise the Planning Proposal under Section 3.36 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, including any necessary minor/technical modifications to the proposal and supporting documentation, and forward the Planning Proposal to Parliamentary Counsel’s Office for publication. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
2: Livable, connected neighbourhoods and transport 3: Creative communities and a strong economy |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report is to finalise six new Special Entertainment Precincts (SEPs) in Balmain, Dulwich Hill, Leichhardt, Marrickville North, Marrickville town Centre and Rozelle and extending the Enmore Road SEP to include 3 new properties including Young Henrys and the Warren View hotel.
Statutory community consultation has been completed, including referrals to NSW Government agencies. The draft Development Control Plans (DCPs) to support the SEPs were exhibited alongside the Planning Proposal. This report includes the findings from the consultation, recommended amendments to both the supporting documents and operation of the precincts including the introduction of SEP trading hours.
It is recommended that Council proceed to finalise the Planning Proposal to amend Inner West LEP 2022 and adopt the draft amendments to the Marrickville DCP 2011 and Leichhardt DCP 2013, as well as the Precinct Management Plan (PMP).
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 20 June 2023, Council resolved the following in part:
1. That Council endorses commencing early engagement on new special entertainment precincts in Marrickville, Leichhardt, Rozelle, Balmain and an additional precinct along Marrickville Rd and New Canterbury Rd, Dulwich Hill.
Results from this initial consultation indicated the following level of support for each precinct:
· 66% for Balmain
· 90% for Dulwich Hill
· 84% for Leichhardt
· 94% for Marrickville North
· 91% for Marrickville Town Centre
· 83% for Rozelle
The results of the early consultation and a Planning Proposal recommended for submission to the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces for a Gateway Determination was endorsed by Council at the 25 June 2024 Council meeting, at which Council resolved in part:
1. That Council endorse the Planning Proposal to amend the Inner West Local Environmental Plan 2022 to designate six new Special Entertainment Precincts (SEPs) and make a minor extension to the Enmore Road SEP to be submitted to the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces seeking a Gateway Determination under Section 3.33 and 3.34 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979.
2. That Council place the Planning Proposal and draft DCP amendments on community consultation in accordance with Council's Community Engagement Framework to meet the requirements of the Gateway Determination, Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, should the Planning Proposal receive a favourable Gateway Determination.
The proposal was then submitted to the Minister of Planning and Public Spaces and the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure. The Gateway Determination was received on 13 September 2024.
DISCUSSION
Consultation was undertaken between 5 March and 6 April 2025. Referrals were made to seven government and industry bodies. Engagement outcomes were largely positive with changes made to address the following issues raised by submissions:
· The section of Darling Street west of Jacques Street has been removed from the Balmain SEP
· The sound criteria format was adjusted, and sound levels raised marginally across Sound Category Areas to align with newly released State Guidelines
· Amendments were made to the PMP to address issues raised in submission including adding fixed trading hours for all precincts
The updated Planning Proposal including the engagement outcomes report from the recent consultation is included in Attachment 1.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
|
1.⇩ |
Special Entertainment Precincts Planning Proposal |
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Post Exhibition - Draft Compliance and Enforcement Policy
Prepared By: Michael Ryan - Senior Manager, Health & Building
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council adopt the Compliance and Enforcement Policy.
2. The Council update the Policy Register and publish, as applicable, internally, and externally the adopted Compliance and Enforcement Policy.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Exhibition of the Draft Compliance and Enforcement Policy closed 17 April 2025. There was broad interest with 236 visits and 56 downloads. There were two submissions - both in support of the draft policy. It is recommended that Council adopt the policy in its advertised form. If adopted procedural documents will be created to support the staff’s implementation of the policy in the investigating compliance and enforcement matters.
BACKGROUND
At Council meeting held on the 11 March 2025, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council publicly exhibit the draft Compliance and Enforcement Policy for a period of 28 days and seek community feedback on the proposed policy subject to the following amendments to the draft:
a) amend page 9 section 6 by adding at the end of paragraph 4: ...the person raising the matter, but that person will be advised of the reasons for the decision not to investigate;
b) amend second dot point at top of page 10 by adding: ...the expenditure of resources having regard to the following factors - the seriousness of the alleged non-compliance; the length of time that has passed since the activity complained of; and the extent of the alleged impact of the non-compliance on the environment, public health and safety, the immediate neighbours or the public; and
c) amend page 11, section 6.1 after second dot point: ...Council's sole discretion and in view of accordance with this Policy's principles and any relevant considerations.
2. That following the conclusion of the exhibition period, the draft Compliance and Enforcement Policy be brought back to Council for consideration for adoption.
3. That Council provide councillors with a tabulated breakdown of proposed changes to the existing policy by way of councillor briefing note within 7 days of this resolution, and that it be published and made publicly available on the Council website.
Following the resolution the requested amendments were made and the changes were published on Council’s Website. A Councillor briefing note was provided to Councillors and the exhibition period was undertaken.
Community Consultation
The draft Compliance and Enforcement Policy was placed on public exhibition between 20 March 2025 and 17 April 2025. In summary:
There were 236 visits to the ‘Have Your Say Inner West” project page during the exhibition period.
There were 56 downloads of the ‘Draft Compliance and Enforcement Policy’.
There were 2 email submissions on the ‘Draft Compliance and Enforcement Policy’.
DISCUSSION
Of the two submissions, one submission simply stated it supported the policy without further detail. The second submission advised that, ‘I do support the revised Compliance and Enforcement Policy, and consider it a quality document in informing the public and providing transparency on Council decision making’. The submission went on to make detailed constructive comments relating to:
· Clarification on how Council ensures accountability for its decisions
· Justification for Compliance and Enforcement Decisions
· Recommendation that internal guidelines are made available to the public in redacted form
· Publication of Compliance and Enforcement actions following a complaint in redacted form
· Support for proportional enforcement based on seriousness or risk of breaches, and encouraging cost effective decision making
· Advocacy for publishing reasons (in generalized or sanitized form) when the Council decides not to investigate a matter,
· Warning that a lack of penalties undermines the planning controls.
Having reviewed the submission and considered the points made, the following comments are made in response;
Once endorsed and as part of the implementation the policy will be supported by an operational procedures document and process mapping to guide staff in their decision making, and to document accountability and provide justification for decisions.
Whilst the publishing of Compliance matters is not recommended due to a range of legal and privacy reasons, the decisions surrounding these matters are documented and are available under the Government Information Public Access (GIPA) Act 2009. Applications under GIPA is considered the most appropriate way of sharing such information as privacy and legal matters can be considered and managed on an issue-by-issue basis.
In line with customer service expectations staff now update complainants of decision-making outcomes. This customer service requirement is also now a formal part of Council’s Complaint Management System.
To address proportionality and transparency the policy sets out an escalation review model for decision making as a control measure. Where requested decisions are reviewed at a higher level and these review decisions are documented.
Conclusion
The number of policy ‘downloads’ and the two supportive submission demonstrates general community support for the policy. Only a single submission made comments. With respect to these comments, they accord with the general approach taken to the development of the policy and none of the comments require amendment to the policy. This is because the comments are largely procedural in nature and will be implemented via an operational guideline or are specifically regarding the publication or sharing of information around decision making once a complaint has been received, which is most appropriately managed via GIPA.
On this basis the draft Compliance and Enforcement Policy as exhibited is recommended for adoption (Attachment 1).
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
|
1.⇩ |
Compliance and Enforcement Policy |
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Post Exhibition - Code of Conduct
Prepared By: Patricia Clive - Governance Manager
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council adopt the Code of Conduct.
2. That Council update the Policy Register and publish, as applicable, internally, and externally the adopted Code of Conduct.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Council is required to review its Code of Conduct within 12 months after a general election.
Council is proposing to make changes to the Inner West Council Code of Conduct to prohibit staff from accepting gifts from suppliers, require staff to seek approval for any secondary employment on an annual basis, clarify conflict of interest disclosure processes, assist with the protection of Council information, clarify the timeframes for making Code of Conduct complaints, and assist with the processing of surrendered gifts and benefits.
At an Ordinary Council Meeting on 11 March 2025, Council approved a draft Code of Conduct incorporating these changes to be placed on public exhibition. Council received one submission, which did not necessitate any changes to the draft Code of Conduct placed on public exhibition. Separately, officers have made one change, to clarify the General Manager’s discretion to consider complaints made outside the 3-month timeframe specified in the Procedures for the Administration of the Model Code of Conduct.
BACKGROUND
Council is required under section 440(7) of the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act) to review its Code of Conduct within the first 12 months after each local government election. The Code of Conduct must incorporate the provisions of the Model Code of Conduct (Model Code) prescribed by the Office of Local Government (OLG) pursuant to section 180(1) of the Local Government (General) Regulations 2021.
Inner West Council first adopted the Model Code in 2019, and it was last reviewed in 2022.
OLG released the Councillor Conduct and Meeting Practices Discussion Paper in September 2024. As part of this process, the OLG foreshadowed that it will prescribe a new Model Code but has not indicated when this will occur. Given the potential for a new Model Code to be prescribed in 2025, Officers recommend making only minor changes to Council’s Code of Conduct as part of this review round.
Council endorsed the draft Code of Conduct at the 11 March 2025 meeting for exhibition with the following proposed changes:
|
Clause |
Change |
Reason |
|
Code |
Typographical errors, grammar, style, renumbering |
To improve the readability and presentation of the Code and ensure consistency with the Model Code of Conduct. |
|
5.6 |
Requiring Council staff to disclose non-pecuniary conflicts of interest to their manager in writing in an approved format. |
Disclosures are currently made in a range of formats. Using an approved format will ensure consistency across Council. |
|
5.6 |
Requiring any disclosures made by Council staff to a Manager to be forwarded to Council’s Governance team for recording. |
To provide guidance and clarification on how disclosures should be managed and to assist with recording disclosures. |
|
5.24 |
Requiring Council staff to apply for annual approval for secondary employment. |
Administratively staff apply annually as a matter of convention, however, this is not a requirement of the Code. An annual application requirement will ensure that any outside employment does not conflict with an employee’s responsibilities or create work, health and safety issues. The requirement to apply annually will enable both the employee and General Manager to consider any changed circumstances and impacts on employment. |
|
5.24 |
Requiring Council staff to apply for annual approval for secondary employment in an approved format. |
This ensures consistency in applying and managing secondary employment across all areas of Council. |
|
6.3 |
Prohibiting Council staff from accepting gifts, benefits or hospitality from Council suppliers, including those using Council facilities. |
To make in explicit in the Code that accepting gifts, benefits or hospitality from suppliers and those using Council facilities is not accepted due to the perception that the supplier may receive favourable treatment in the future. |
|
6.7 |
Empowering the General Manager to determine how to dispose of surrendered gifts. |
The Code does not specify how surrendered gifts will be disposed of. This change will make it clear that the General Manager is responsible for disposing of surrendered gifts. |
|
6.7 |
Permitting Council to nominate a charity to receive surrendered gifts and benefits. |
This change will enable charities in the Inner West local government area to make use of the surrendered gifts and benefits for their charitable causes. Officers will request Council to nominate a charity to which any surrendered gifts may be provided. |
|
8.11 |
Imposing a clear desk requirement on Council staff to protect of Council’s information. |
Council’s ICT Acceptable Use Protocol includes a clear desk requirement, however, inclusion in the Code will make this an enforceable requirement. This provides a mechanism to ensure integrity and security of sensitive and confidential information. |
|
9.9 |
Clarifying that Code of Conduct complaints must be raised with 3 months. |
The Procedures for the Administration of the Model Code of Conduct specify that complaints under the Code must be made within 3 months of the occurrence of the conduct that forms the basis of the complaint, or the complainant becoming aware of the conduct. However, the Code does not clarify this timeframe. As people may not be as familiar with the Procedures for the Administration of the Model Code of Conduct, this inclusion is intended to increase awareness. Officers note that the General Manager has discretion regarding the timeframe and may consider Code of Conduct complaints raised outside this. |
DISCUSSION
The draft Code of Conduct was placed on public exhibition from 17 March 2025 to 13 April 2025. The Your Say Inner West project page was viewed 314 times, and the draft Code of Conduct was downloaded 42 times. There was one submission received during the public exhibition period regarding the draft Code of Conduct, as outlined below.
|
Support (Yes or No) |
Public Exhibition Comment/Explanation |
IWC Comment |
|
Don’t know/unsure |
Does seem a bit woke overkill! Just wish Council would concentrate on the basics. Ya know like and limb stuff rather than it’s usual consultative crap that has no intention of listening to. My annoyance at Council constant need for approval. Pathetic really. |
Council has a legislative requirement to consult with the community whenever it is proposed to amend the Code of Conduct. |
The comments provided have been addressed as outlined in the table above.
Council’s Independent Ombudsman provided feedback relating to the General Manager’s discretion to review complaints outside the 3-month timeframe. Based on this feedback clause 9.9 has been clarified to preserve the General Manager’s discretion.
After reviewing the feedback, Officers recommend that Council adopt the draft Code of Conduct at Attachment 1.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
|
1.⇩ |
Draft Code of Conduct |
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Post Exhibition - Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy
Prepared By: Julian Sakarai - Acting Senior Manager Governance and Risk
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council adopt the Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy.
2. The Council update the Policy Register and publish, as applicable, internally, and externally the adopted Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Under section 252 of the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act), Council must adopt a Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy (the Policy) within 12 months of the commencement of a new Council term. Officers proposed minor changes to the Policy, and submitted a draft Policy to Council on 29 April 2025, for public exhibition. No submissions were received during the exhibition period. This report recommends that Council adopts the Policy that was placed on public exhibition, with no changes.
BACKGROUND
At the Ordinary Council meeting held on 29 April 2025, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council publicly exhibit the draft Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy for a period of 28 days and seek community feedback on the proposed Policy.
2. That following the conclusion of the exhibition period, the draft Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy be brought back to Council for consideration for adoption.
The draft Policy was subsequently placed on public exhibition.
As reported to the 29 April 2025 Council meeting, the following table outlines the proposed changes to the current Policy and the reason for these changes:
|
Clause |
Change |
Reason |
|
5; 9.1-9.5; 9.22-9.31 |
Category increases - Increase of expense category limits for professional development and general travel by 10%. |
Council’s Policy was adopted in 2022. After this review, the next scheduled review will take place in 2028-2029. The expense limits for professional development/conferences and general travel costs have not changed since 2022. Costs in these categories have increased and will likely continue to increase.
|
|
9.16 |
Incidental expenses - Inclusion of permission for payment of incidental expenses for attendance at conferences, seminars and work trips. |
If a Councillor attends a conference or seminar, the Policy explicitly enables them to claim for associated costs such as the cost of travel, accommodation, and meals. It does not explicitly enable them to claim for other incidental expenses that may occur.
We consider that the inclusion of permission to pay such incidental expenses would be equitable, to enable Councillors to participate in Council events, conferences and work trips.
|
|
9.37 |
Mobile phone expenses - Reimbursement of mobile phone expenses. Additional permission to pay a flat reimbursement for any Councillor who elects not to specify the portion of the bill that is related to Council business. |
To enable Officers to pay a percentage of a mobile phone bill where a Councillor provides a percentage that is related to Council business, or a flat reimbursement of $50 where no percentage is provided.
|
|
- |
Communications support – Removal of communications support details from policy. |
The details relating to communications support will be removed and inserted into Council’s Councillor Media Policy and Social Media Policy, which is currently on public exhibition for community feedback.
|
|
Throughout document |
Reimbursement categories - Rearrangement, consolidation, and/or separation of certain categories in the policy. |
The expense categories in the policy do not align with the format in which Council is required to report expenses in its Annual Report. Officers recommend changing these categories to ensure consistent reporting.
This will not change any Councillor entitlements, and is a purely administrative change suggested to make Council’s reporting more robust.
|
|
Throughout document |
Removal of gender specific language |
In accordance with Council’s Gender Equity Strategy. |
DISCUSSION
The draft Policy was placed on public exhibition from 2 May 2025 to 30 May 2025.There were 136 visits to the Your Say Inner West project page during public exhibition and the Policy was downloaded 43 times.
There were no submissions received during the public exhibition period regarding the draft Policy.
This report recommends that Council adopts the Policy that was placed on public exhibition, with no changes.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Council’s budget identifies funding to cover the costs relating to the expenses and facilities outlined in the Policy.
|
1.⇩ |
Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy |
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Public Exhibition - Code of Meeting Practice
Prepared By: Julian Sakarai - Acting Senior Manager Governance and Risk
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council publicly exhibits the draft Code of Meeting Practice for a period of 28 days, and invite submissions for a period of 42 days after the draft Code of Meeting Practice is placed on public exhibition.
2. That following the conclusion of the exhibition and submission period, the draft Code of Meeting Practice be brought back to Council for consideration for adoption.
3. That Council receives a further report after the Office of Local Government releases the new Model Code of Meeting Practice.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Local Government Act 1993 requires councils to adopt a code of meeting practice that is consistent with the Model Code of Meeting Practice prescribed by the Office of Local Government, within 12 months of an ordinary election of councillors. Prior to adopting the code of meeting practice, councils must place the document on public exhibition for 28 days, and invite submissions for 42 days.
The Office of Local Government released a Consultation Draft of a new Model Code of Meeting Practice in December 2024. Council lodged a submission in respect of the Consultation Draft in February 2025. The timeline for releasing the final Model Code of Meeting Practice is not publicly available.
Council has until September 2025 to adopt a code of meeting practice that is consistent with the current Model Code of Meeting Practice. To meet this statutory timeframe, Officers recommend placing the current Inner West Council Code of Meeting Practice on public exhibition, with no changes, and inviting submissions. Officers also recommend that Council receives a further report once the new Model Code of Meeting Practice is issued.
DISCUSSION
Section 360 of the Local Government Act 1993 (Act) requires each council to adopt a code of meeting practice that incorporates the mandatory provisions of the model code prescribed by Local Government (General) Regulation 2021 (Regulations), within 12 months of an ordinary election of councillors.
Section 361 of the Act also requires each council to:
· place its code of meeting practice on public exhibition for a period of at least 28 days; and
· invite submissions for a period of 42 days after the date on which the draft code of meeting practice is placed on public exhibition.
The last ordinary election of councillors in New South Wales was held in September 2024. Accordingly, Council has until September 2025 to adopt a code of meeting practice that is consistent with the current Model Code of Meeting Practice prescribed by the Regulations.
In December 2024, the Office of Local Government released a Consultation Draft Model Code of Meeting Practice (Consultation Draft) and sought feedback. At an Ordinary Council meeting on 18 February 2025, Council considered a draft submission in respect of the Consultation Draft and resolved to approve the submission to be sent to the Office of Local Government. The submission is attached.
The Office of Local Government is considering the feedback received as part of the consultation process and has not yet released a new Model Code of Meeting Practice. The timeline for releasing the new Model Code of Meeting Practice is not publicly available.
To comply with the requirement to adopt a code of meeting practice that is consistent with the current prescribed Model Code of Meeting Practice by September 2025, Officers recommend that the current Code, with no changes, be placed on public exhibition for a period of 28 days, with submissions invited for 42 days. Following the conclusion of the exhibition and submission period, the draft Code will be brought back to Council for consideration and adoption.
Officers also recommend that Council receives a further report when the Office of Local Government releases its new Model Code of Meeting Practice.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
|
1.⇩ |
Draft Code of Meeting Practice |
|
2.⇩ |
Adopted submission from February 2025 to the Office of Local Government Consultation on the draft new model Code of Meeting Practice |
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Public Exhibition - Loyalty Square, Balmain Improvement Works
Prepared By: Michael Craven - Projects Delivery Manager
Authorised By: Scott Mullen - Acting Director Property and Major Projects
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council publicly exhibit the conceptual designs for the Loyalty Square, Balmain Improvement works including List of Fallen Soldiers for a period of 28 days and seek community feedback.
2. That following the conclusion of the exhibition period, the conceptual designs for Loyalty Square, Balmain improvement works including List of Fallen Soldiers be brought back to Council for consideration for adoption.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport 3: Creative communities and a strong economy |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
As part of the Main Streets Revitalisation Program, Council has developed concept plans for the improvement of Loyalty Square, Balmain. These proposed plans include an additional wall to recognise Balmain service personnel who died during World War I, who are not listed on the existing 1916 War Memorial.
The proposed improvements include:
· Removal of the existing pergola and wisteria vine
· A new memorial wall to commemorate fallen WW1 soldiers not currently recognised at the site
· Relocation of the existing memorial plaques on and around the steps of the Balmain War Memorial to a new location under the fig tree
· Removal of the bollards and chain around the existing Balmain War Memorial
· Renewal of the existing planting areas
· Removal of seating under the existing Fig Tree
· Lighting improvements to enhance safety within Loyalty Square
The existing Balmain War Memorial will be retained. with two improvement options included with the conceptual plans for the consideration of the community. The options include:
· Option 1: Retaining and widening of the rosemary garden to the Memorial steps.
· Option 2: Sandstone bench to replace two of the rosemary garden beds.
The proposed list of Fallen Soldiers to be included on the additional wall contains 196 names, with the criteria for inclusion being that they were Killed in Action or Died of Wounds, and lived in the Suburbs of Balmain, East Balmain and Birchgrove.
This report seeks to obtain Council endorsement to publicly exhibit the conceptual designs for the Loyalty Square, Balmain Improvement works including List of Fallen Soldiers for a period of 28 days and seek community feedback.
BACKGROUND
As part of an expression of interest under the Main Streets Revitalisation program, Loyalty Square, Balmain was identified by the Balmain/Rozelle Chamber of Commerce and other community members for improvements.
In this regard, Loyalty Square, in the heart of Balmain, is a popular location for the community to meet and is the home of a significant ANZAC war memorial, honouring our fallen soldiers. The revitalisation of this space will enhance the character of the square and make it more inviting.
At the Council meeting held on 5 December 2023 meeting, Council resolved the following in part:
1. That Council consider the proposal to add an additional memorial wall or structure to Loyalty Square Balmain to recognise the fallen soldiers not currently listed on the existing War Memorial, as part of the 2024/25 budget process.
3. That Council Officers seek and/or apply for grants or funding sources for new war memorials in Balmain.
DISCUSSION
As part of the Main Streets Revitalisation Program, Council has developed concept plans for the improvement of Loyalty Square, Balmain. These proposed plans include an additional wall to recognise Balmain service personnel who died during World War I, who are not listed on the existing 1916 War Memorial.
The proposed improvements include:
· Removal of the existing pergola and wisteria vine
· A new memorial wall to commemorate fallen WW1 soldiers not currently recognised at the site
· Relocation of the existing memorial plaques on and around the steps of the Balmain War Memorial to a new location under the fig tree
· Removal of the bollards and chain around the existing Balmain War Memorial
· Renewal of the existing planting areas
· Removal of seating under the existing Fig Tree
· Lighting improvements to enhance safety within Loyalty Square
The existing Balmain War Memorial will be retained. with two improvement options included with the conceptual plans for the consideration of the community. The options include:
· Option 1: Retaining and widening of the rosemary garden to the Memorial steps.
· Option 2: Sandstone bench to replace two of the rosemary garden beds.
The proposed concept design and artist impressions for the Loyalty Square improvements are attached to this report. An example design of the memorial wall is included showing the locations of the names of fallen personnel as well as the opportunities for interpretive stories to be incorporated to provide historic context.
Loyalty Square hosts a variety of community events throughout the year and contains Christmas ornaments and decorative lighting installations each year in December. These elements will be considered as a part of the detailed design to ensure adequate services are available for those uses.
There is limited area to accommodate the memorial walls with Loyalty Square, with the most appropriate positioning from a functional and aesthetics perspective being beneath the existing fig tree. This optimises circulation and accessibility routes across the Square, and the ability for the square to cater for community events. Its worth noting that the location beneath the fig tree conflicts with a former art piece titled Seat Sculpture which was installed by Richard Goodwin in 1998. In this regard, the piece has been partially removed overtime due to its poor condition, with only a timber seat which is broken and a post remaining. It is proposed to remove these elements as a part of the improvement works to allow the most appropriate location for the memorial walls to proceed.
Early engagement has been
undertaken with the Balmain-Rozelle RSL Sub-Branch regarding the proposed works
to the existing and new memorials, with support provided to the concept designs
being placed on Public Exhibition.
The proposed community engagement includes an onsite pop-up session, letter drop, and a Your Say community webpage. Key stakeholder groups such as the Balmain-Rozelle Chamber of Commerce, Balmain Association and the Department of Veteran affairs will also be engaged.
It is proposed that the consultation extend for 28 days, with the outcomes reported to Council at its September 2025 meeting.
Following the information sourced through the consultation process being considered and Council endorsement being obtained, the detailed design phase will commence which will incorporate a Heritage Impact Assessment. If the outcome of the Heritage Impact Assessment is that a Development Application is not required, then the procurement for the construction works will occur in late 2025 with construction to commence post ANZAC Day 2026. Works would then be expected to be completed by July 2026.
If a Development Application is required, then construction will be scheduled for 2026/27.
The next steps, and whether a DA is required will be confirmed in the post exhibition Council report.
List of Fallen Soldiers - Background and Research
The additional names of service personnel from the Balmain district who fought and died in World War was researched by Inner West Council’s Community History and Heritage Team.
Names were collated from the Commonwealth Australian Imperial Force Project, a World War One Database, “Discovering Anzacs”. The website was a partnership between National Archives of Australia and Archives New Zealand and included digitised service records of Australian and New Zealanders who served in the First World War and the Boer War.
The list of additional names was fact checked by Balmain-Rozelle RSL sub-Branch president Ron Glue in 2023 and approved by the Balmain Association in 2024.
St Marys Anglican Church and Balmain Rowing Club added a few additional names, which were residents who had a strong association with the Balmain area and the list was cross referenced, and fact checked.
The final list contains 196 additional names with the criteria for inclusion being that they were Killed in Action or Died of Wounds, and lived in the Suburbs of Balmain, East Balmain and Birchgrove. It’s worth noting that the names of Rozelle fallen soldiers are documented and commemorated at the Rozelle Tram sheds.
The List of Fallen Soldiers is attached to this report and is a part of the proposed consultation, with community members being able to put forward additional names and the rationale for their inclusion. Council will verify the information provided against the criteria to determine if they are eligible to be included onto the proposed memorial wall in consultation with the RSL. The final List of Fallen Soldiers will be confirmed in the post exhibition Council report.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The estimated cost to deliver the improvements works is $420,000.
There are adequate funds available within the Main Street Revitalisation Program to deliver the improvements works.
Notwithstanding this, Council officers will continue to review appropriate grant opportunities to support the construction of the new memorial walls in line with the December 2023 Council resolution.
|
1.⇩ |
Loyalty Square Balmain Consultation Pack |
|
2.⇩ |
List of Fallen Soliders |
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Local Traffic Committee Meeting - 19 May 2025
Prepared By: Jason Scoufis - Acting Traffic and Transport Planning Manager
Authorised By: Manod Wickramasinghe - Acting Director Engineering
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and adopt the recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee meeting held on 19 May 2025. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Local Traffic Committee meeting was held at the Ashfield Service Centre and has made recommendations for Council’s consideration and adoption.
DISCUSSION
The May 2025 meeting of the Local Traffic Committee was held at the Ashfield Service Centre. The minutes of the meeting are shown in Attachment 1.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report. Projects proposed for implementation are funded within existing budget allocations.
ITEMS BY WARD –
|
Ward |
Item |
|
Baludarri (Balmain)
|
Eaton Street south of Gladstone Street, Balmain - Proposed Raised Pedestrian Crossing |
|
King Street, Birchgrove Road and Darling Street, Balmain - Proposed Intersection Improvements |
|
|
The Boulevarde, Lilyfield - Proposed Streetscape Improvements and Civil Works |
|
|
Gulgadya (Leichhardt)
|
Nil |
|
Midjuburi (Marrickville)
|
Schwebel Street, Marrickville - Traffic Study Report for a proposed one-way treatment at Schwebel Street between Illawarra Road and Carrington Road |
|
Livingstone Road and Hill Street, Marrickville – Traffic safety Investigation |
|
|
Centennial Street, Marrickville – Temporary Road Closure for Special Event at Henson Park – 2025 Beer, Footy and Food Festival on Saturday 26 July 2025 |
|
|
Marrickville Road, Marrickville – Temporary full road closure for Marrickville Music Festival – Sunday 12 October 2025 |
|
|
Warham Lane, Marrickville – Notice of Motion – Parking traffic plan for Henson Park events |
|
|
Djarrawunang (Ashfield)
|
Marrickville Road, part of Seaview Street and Durham Street, Caves Lane, Marrickville – Temporary full Road Closures for Dulwich Hill Village Fair – Sunday 21 September 2025 |
|
Henson Street (at Herbert Street), Summer Hill-Proposed New Raised pedestrian crossing |
|
|
The Esplanade/Markham Place, Ashfield-Proposed bicycle contra-flow facility |
|
|
Arthur Street at Holborow Street, Ashfield-Proposed 'No Stopping' at the corners of Arthur Street |
|
|
Damun (Stanmore) |
Douglas Street and Douglas Lane, Stanmore - Resident Parking Scheme Survey Results and proposed 'No Parking' and 'No Stopping' restrictions |
|
All Wards |
12 Month Review of Pedestrian Crossing Warrant Policy |
|
1.⇩ |
Local Traffic Committee minutes- 19 May 2025 |
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Local Democracy Groups progress report and policy challenges for the term
Prepared By: Prue Foreman - Corporate Strategy and Engagement Manager
Authorised By: Ruth Callaghan - Director Community
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council endorse policy challenges for the Local Democracy Groups to deliberate on during the term.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report updates Council on the recruitment and onboarding of Local Democracy Groups for the term. It also proposes topics for policy challenges on which the Local Democracy Groups will deliberate throughout the term, for Council’s consideration.
Council previously resolved to receive six monthly progress reports on the Local Democracy Groups. This is the first report of the new term.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 22 October 2024, Council resolved the following in part:
2. That Council endorse the process and timeline for recruiting and inducting new LDG members for the new Council term.
3. That Council determine the three Councillor representatives to participate in the selection process and panel are Clr D’Arienzo, Clr Clay and Clr Barlow.
DISCUSSION
Recruitment and Induction
The Selection Panel, comprising three councillors and the relevant Director met to assess the applicants who had submitted expressions of interest during the recruitment period. The Selection Panel meeting was held on 15 January 2025 with a further meeting held on 26 February 2025 to finalise the Small Business LDG membership. The Selection Panel determined successful members, and established eligibility lists.
During the acceptance stage, four successful applicants declined their offers and consequently offers were made to people on the eligibility list, in the order nominated by the Selection Panel. If further vacancies arise throughout the term, such as by resignation of a member, new members will also be appointed from the eligibility list. Should the eligibility list ‘be exhausted’ an annual recruitment will take place, and the Selection Panel will be reconvened.
Council has in total, 14 LDGs for the current term. A welcome reception for all members was held on 13 March at Ashfield Town Hall. Ninety members, councillors, Council’s executive and staff who convene the groups attended. The evening was emceed by Director Community. Speakers included Mayor Darcy Byrne, Councillor Vicki Clay and a guest speaker, Robert Helstroom, a returning member of the Environment LDG. The evening was a success, with attendees positive and enthusiastic for the term ahead.
On Wednesday 26 March, Council’s Governance team delivered training to members on the Code of Conduct, conflicts of interest and effective chairing and participation. Additional training will be held in person for the Young Leaders and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander groups.
Group meetings have commenced with the first held by the Bicycle LDG on Tuesday 25 March 2025. Since then all groups have met at least once.
Policy challenges
Council establishes key policy challenges on which the Local Democracy Groups deliberate during their term. The policy challenges are focused on areas where community input is a vital component in guiding Council’s actions and decisions. The following policy challenges are proposed for each group. These were developed in consultation with relevant senior staff and consider adopted Council priorities for the term.
|
Local Democracy Group |
Proposed policy challenge/s for 2024-28 term |
|
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander |
1) How can Council refresh the Reconciliation Action Plan and systematically embed those commitments into policy development, implementation, and evaluation? This will include delivery of the Aboriginal Community Hub. |
|
Access |
1) How can Council systematically embed Disability Inclusion Action Plan commitments into policy development, implementation, and evaluation? 2) How can Council maintain and enhance its status as an Employer of Choice for people with disability? |
|
Arts and Culture |
1) The Inner West is home to more artists and people employed in the creative sector per capita than anywhere else in NSW. How can Council work with these local networks and industry experts to support and grow our local creative sector sustainably? 2) How can the development and implementation of the new Inner West Cultural Strategy best support the local creative sector? |
|
Bicycle |
1) The GreenWay is a revolutionary environmental and active travel corridor linking the Cooks River at Earlwood with the Parramatta River at Iron Cove. How can we leverage this active transport superhighway to assist in decreasing car dependency for short trips in our communities? What links can we identify that will enable safe routes for connecting to schools, public transport and shops? 2) What are the 5 Inner West priority cycle links? What are the obstacles that could potentially delay delivery and how can we overcome them? |
|
Customer Experience |
1) What are the customer focused priorities for improving Council's performance and what targeted priorities, initiatives and actions should be included in the next Customer Experience Strategy? 2) How can Council ensure that the actions in the Customer Experience Strategy are seen and felt by the community? |
|
Environment |
1) The Inner West community is characterised by diverse incomes, cultural backgrounds, and dwelling types, including apartments, houses, townhouses, and boarding houses. How can we ensure that everyone in our community lives well sustainably, and nature thrives in a changing climate? 2) Moving towards a circular economy, how can we achieve our Zero Waste objectives of reducing waste landfilled per capita by 50% by 2036 when good items are still being disposed of rather than repaired or reused? How do we engage the community to make repair and reuse their first choice? |
|
Housing for All |
1) How can Council provide our diverse community with more housing in well located, appropriate areas? |
|
LGBTQ+ |
1) How can we foster opportunities for allyship, visibility and pride within the Inner West? 2) How can we increase the visibility of the Pride Centre as a community venue? |
|
Multicultural |
1) How can Council implement and systematically embed the Anti-Racism Strategy (including input to the design of the Anti-Racism bystander training) and Multicultural policy commitments into broader policy development, implementation, and evaluation? |
|
Seniors |
1) What issues and engagement will support redevelopment of the current Healthy Ageing Strategy with a continued focus on supporting the participation of older people? |
|
Small Business |
1) How can we engage students and young professionals in small business careers in the inner west? 2) How can we assist in expanding small business opportunities and employment for apprentices and people with disability? 3) How can we work towards a goal of zero vacancies in main street shop fronts, by bringing main street property owners, local businesses and chambers of commerce together with Council. 4) What strategies or actions should form the development of Inner West Tourism Action Plan? |
|
Social Strategy |
1) What needs and issues should be considered by Council in developing and maintaining resilient social connections and community wellbeing? |
|
Transport |
1) How can we better connect to public transport to further facilitate sustainable travel and reduce road congestion and parking reliance? 2) What strategies can we implement to reduce the demand for private vehicle parking in the Inner West? |
|
Young Leaders |
1) What needs and issues need to be considered in development and implementation of Council’s Child and Youth Strategy? |
Progress on the policy challenges will be reported to Council twice per year.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Planning Proposal for 75-85 Crown Street and 116 Princes Highway, St Peters
Prepared By: Daniel East - Senior Manager Strategic Planning
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council support the Planning Proposal for 75-85 Crown Street and 116 Princes Highway St Peters to amend the Inner West Local Environmental Plan 2022, proceeding to Gateway subject to the following: a) Reduce the maximum Floor Space Ratio (FSR) to 4:1. b) Include a site-specific local provision requiring at least 2% of new residential Gross Floor Area (GFA) be provided as affordable housing, managed by a registered community housing provider in perpetuity.
2. That Council forward the Planning Proposal to the NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure for a Gateway Determination in accordance with section 3.34 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, requesting the following Gateway conditions: b) Urban Design Report be updated illustrating the built form outcome consistent with reduced FSR, including a reference scheme showing the corresponding GFA and number of dwellings; c) Traffic Impact Assessment be updated and include a strategic-level Green Travel Plan demonstrating mechanisms for delivering effective mode shift; d) Sustainability strategy be prepared to demonstrate a commitment to exceed minimum sustainability requirements established by standards such as NABERS, BASIX, or NatHERS; and e) Site-specific amendment to Marrickville Development Control Plan 2011 be updated to be consistent with the updated Planning Proposal and other supporting documents.
3. That Council request the NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure to authorise Council to be the Local Plan Making Authority (LPMA), and if Council is authorised as the LPMA, Council delegate the plan making functions to Director Planning to exercise the function in accordance with the LEP Making Guideline.
4. That following receipt of an affirmative Gateway Determination and compliance with its conditions, agree to place the updated Planning Proposal and supporting documentation on public exhibition for a minimum of 28 days and consult with public authorities in accordance with the Gateway Determination.
5. That following the conclusion of the exhibition period, the Planning Proposal be brought back to Council for consideration.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
1: An ecologically sustainable Inner West 2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport 3: Creative communities and a strong economy 4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Planning Proposal for 75-85 Crown Street and 116 Princes Highway, St Peters (the site) seeks to amend the Inner West Local Environmental Plan 2022 (IWLEP) to facilitate a 10 storey mixed use building through changes to floor space ratio and height of building controls. The proposed changes would result in approx. 65 - 80 new residential dwellings and 1,016 sqm of commercial/retail space.
This Planning Proposal and supporting technical studies (refer to Attachment 1) have been assessed in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act) and relevant guidelines. Subject to changes outlined in this report, the Planning Proposal has demonstrated strategic merit as it is consistent with State and Local Government aspirations relating to increasing housing supply in well located areas.
The proposal has sufficient strategic and site-specific merit to proceed to the NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI) for a Gateway Determination.
BACKGROUND
In November 2021, a Pre-Lodgement Proposal was submitted by Ethos Urban on behalf of the landowner, C & M Antoniou Pty Ltd (the proponent), and in March 2022 Council issued advice on the matters to be addressed in any future proposal for the site.
The Planning Proposal was lodged on the NSW Planning Portal by the proponent, and accepted by Council on 29 April 2024, which sought to amend the IWLEP as follows:
· increase the maximum Height of Building (HOB) from 9.5m and 14m RL 51m (35m AHD - equivalent to 10 storeys)
· increase the maximum Floor Space Ratio (FSR) from 0.85:1 and 1.75:1 to 5:1
· introduce a local provision allowing residential accommodation at ground floor, provided it is part of a mixed-use development and contains no more than 88 sqm of residential Gross Floor Area (GFA) at ground level.
The Planning Proposal is accompanied by a draft site-specific amendment to the Marrickville Development Control Plan (MDCP) 2011. The proposal also refers to an intention to provide to provide 10% of the proposed dwellings as affordable housing for a period of 10 years, however no letter of offer or supporting LEP provisions have been provided to confirm the delivery of affordable housing.
On 19 June 2024, the Planning Proposal was referred to the Inner West Architectural Excellence and Design Review Panel (AEDRP) for advice on the proposed built form and design controls in the IWLEP and MDCP. Minutes from the AEDRP meeting were issued on 4 July 2024.
The AEDRP raised a number of issues with the proposed built form and inconsistencies with the Apartment Design Guide (ADG). Following this advice, on 2 August 2024, Council officers wrote to the proponent requesting a number of site-specific matters be addressed, in addition to the AEDRP comments (refer to Attachment 2).
On 5 December 2024, the proponent submitted a revised Planning Proposal, which is the subject of this report. The amended proposal retains a maximum HOB of RL 51m (35m), however proposes to further increase maximum FSR to 5:1, and the local provision to allow residential GFA at ground level up to 88 sqm.
On 25 March 2025, the revised Planning Proposal was reported to the Inner West Local Planning Panel (IWLPP) for advice and minutes from the IWLPP meeting were issued on 27 March 2025 (refer to Attachment 3).
DISCUSSION
Site and Surrounding Context
The subject site is located at 75-85 Crown Street and 116 Princes Highway, St Peters and is legally described as Lot 24 DP 1249592, Lot 21 DP 1249588 and Lot 10 DP 1227918. A map of the site and legal descriptions is at Figure 1.
Figure 1: Map of subject site (red boundary) including legal description
The site has a total area of 1,931 sqm and adjoins Crown Street to the east, Campbell Street to the south, Princes Highway to the west, 90 Princes Highway to the north and 73 Crown Street to the north-east. It has road frontage widths of approximately 20.3m on Princes Highway, 62m on Campbell Street and 44.2m on Crown Street.
75 Crown Street (Lot 24 DP 1249592) currently contains one semi-detached dwelling. 116 Princes Highway (Lot 21 DP 1249588) contains the other semi-detached dwelling connected to 75 Crown Street and a warehouse/light industrial building. 85 Crown Street (Lot 10 DP 1227918) is occupied by a mechanic workshop.
Immediately to the north-east and east of the site along Crown Street are predominantly 2-storey semi-detached dwellings and terraces. Sydney Park is approximately 200m east of the site. Immediately to the north, south and west of the site, along Campbell Street and Princes Highway, are a mix of 2-storey light industrial and employment uses. Further north of the site along Princes Highway are predominantly mixed-use developments of 4-7 storeys.
The topography varies from approximately 17.5m AHD on the south-eastern corner to 16m AHD in the north-eastern corner and north-west corner. The site is within 650m walking distance of St Peters railway station, while there are bus services within 200m that provide connection to the Sydney CBD, Mascot and the Airport. The site is approximately 2.7km north-west of Sydney Airport.
Figure 2: Aerial photo of site
Figure 3: Site viewed from Campbell Street
Figure 4: Site viewed from Campbell Street and Princes Highway
Figure 5: Site viewed from Campbell Street and Crown Street
Figure 6: Site viewed from Crown Street
Current Planning Controls
The existing IWLEP zoning and principal planning controls for the site are shown in Table 1 below.
Table 1: Current IWLEP zoning and planning controls for subject site
|
Control |
116 Princes Highway |
85 Crown Street |
75 Crown Street |
|
Land Zoning |
MU1 Mixed Use |
MU1 Mixed Use |
R1 General Residential |
|
Height of Buildings |
14m |
14m |
9.5m |
|
Floor Space Ratio |
1.75:1 |
1.75:1 |
0.85:1 |
|
Additional Local Provisions |
Nil |
||
|
Heritage |
No heritage items or conservation areas |
||
IWLEP Land Zoning Map, Height of Buildings Map and Floor Space Ratio Map excerpts for the proposal site and surrounds are shown in Figure 7, 8, and 9, respectively:
Figure 7: Current Land Zoning for Proposal Site (red boundary) and surrounds
Figure 8: Current Height of Buildings Map for Proposal Site (red boundary) and surrounds
Figure 9: Current Floor Space Ratio Map for Proposal Site (red boundary) and surrounds
The site is located entirely within the Sydney Airport’s Australian Noise Exposure Forecast (ANEF) 25-30 contour, while the Obstacle Limitation Surface (OLS) prescribed airspace occurs at 51m AHD across the site.
There are no mapped flood or contamination affectations on the site.
The Planning Proposal
The Planning Proposal seeks to amend the IWLEP as follows:
· Introduce a maximum HOB of RL 51 (35m);
· Introduce a maximum FSR of 5:1; and
· Include an Additional Local Provision allowing for residential accommodation on the ground floor of the MU1 Zone if it:
o is part of mixed-use development; and
o contains no more than 88 sqm residential Gross Floor Area at ground floor level.
The proposal is accompanied by a reference scheme (illustrated in Figure 10) which indicates the following:
· total GFA of 9,565 sqm;
· 1,016 sqm GFA of non-residential uses including light industrial, commercial and retail uses on the ground floor and lower level 1;
· A total of 82 dwellings (total 7,666 sqm GFA) with the following dwelling mix:
o 8 studio units (10%);
o 27 one-bedroom units (33%);
o 28 two-bedroom units (34%); and
o 19 three-bedroom units (23%);
· 177 sqm (9%) of deep soil area and 290 sqm (15%) of canopy coverage;
· 630 sqm (32.7%) of communal open space (including internal and external areas); and
· 65 car parking spaces (44 residential and 14 non-residential)
Figure 10: Proposed building form from south-west view (Source: Studio.SC)
Planning Proposal Assessment Summary
A summary of the matters for consideration is provided in Table 2. A detailed assessment is provided in the Planning Proposal Assessment Checklist (refer to Attachment 4).
Table 2: Summary of Matters for Consideration
|
Matters for consideration |
Council Response |
|
Q1. Is the planning proposal a result of an endorsed LSPS, strategic study or report? |
The PP is not the result of the Inner West LSPS, but generally supports it and particularly Planning Priority 6: Plan for high quality, accessible and sustainable housing growth in appropriate locations integrated with infrastructure provision and with respect for place, local character and heritage significance. The PP provides new housing capacity in close proximity to St Peters train station, Newtown-Enmore Town Centre and significant open space at Sydney Park. |
|
Q2. Is the planning proposal the best means of achieving the objectives or intended outcomes, or is there a better way? |
The PP is, in principle, an appropriate pathway to deliver more housing to meet the Inner West’s housing targets, subject to a full examination of strategic and site-specific merits. The site’s location presents as a gateway opportunity and it is recognised that it could accommodate further uplift than what the current IWLEP controls allow through the PP process. |
|
Q3. Will the planning proposal give effect to the objectives and actions of the applicable regional or district plan or strategy (including any exhibited draft plans or strategies)? |
The PP is partially consistent with the Greater Sydney Region Plan and Eastern City District Plan, but is partly inconsistent on matters relating to the PP’s transition to surrounding neighbourhoods and its urban tree canopy provision. It is also inconsistent with District Plan Direction 4 Housing the city, including aspects relating to affordable housing provision. |
|
Q4. Is the planning proposal consistent with a council LSPS that has been endorsed by the Planning Secretary or GSC, or another endorsed local strategy or strategic plan? |
The PP is generally consistent with Inner West’s LSPS, Local Housing Strategy, Community Strategic Plan, Employment and Retail Lands Strategy (EARLS) and Integrated Transport Strategy. There are inconsistencies relating to building design, urban tree canopy and affordable housing. The PP is also inconsistent with Inner West’s Affordable Housing Policy. |
|
Q5. Is the planning proposal consistent with any other applicable State and regional studies or strategies? |
As discussed previously. |
|
Q6. Is the planning proposal consistent with applicable SEPPs? |
The PP is generally consistent with the relevant SEPPs, other than Chapter 4 of SEPP (Housing) 2021. The PP does not demonstrate a capacity to meet requirements of Parts 2C, 3D and 3E of the ADG unless its proposed FSR/GFA are reduced to allow suitable transitions and deep soil planting. Chapter 2 Affordable housing of the SEPP also applies to the site. Under Division 1 In-fill affordable housing, the site is eligible for an additional 30% of FSR on top of the maximum allowable FSR under IWLEP, provided that this component is used as affordable housing for a 15-year period. Under the Proposal, the total potential FSR allowed on the site under this Division would be 6.5:1. The proponent was requested to undertake a built form analysis to demonstrate a final built form outcome if the additional incentives in the Housing SEPP were utilised. This analysis has not yet been undertaken by the proponent and the proponent has expressed the bonus is unlikely to be utilised given that the site is restricted in terms of its potential height by the OLS 51m. However, there is no certainty regarding this outcome as the Housing SEPP prevails and a future DA can rely on these Housing SEPP incentives which may have a substantial built form amenity impact on the adjoining area. Finally, the site is excluded from NSW Government’s Low and Mid Rise Housing reforms (Housing SEPP) which came into effect in February 2025 due to the site being in ANEF 25-30 contour. |
|
Q7. Is the planning proposal consistent with applicable Ministerial Directions (section 9.1 Directions)? |
The PP is generally consistent with all relevant Ministerial Directions. The total building height is below the Sydney Airport Obstacle Limitation Surface (OLS) prescribed airspace of 51m AHD, so that the proposal is consistent with Direction 5.3 – Development Near Regulated Airports and Defence Airfields. The site is also within the ANEF 25-30 contour and proposes to reduce increased residential densities. This itself does not result in any inconsistency with Direction 5.3, which requires any PP that increases residential density within ANEF 20+ contours to include a provision to ensure that development meets Australian Standards in relation to aircraft noise exposure. Clause 6.8 of IWLEP already contains this requirement across Inner West LGA. Further, the Acoustic Report prepared in support of the PP, considers aircraft noise and recommends that the site can be made suitable for increased residential density. Further detailed assessment will be undertaken at the Development Application stage. |
|
Q8. Is there any likelihood that critical habitat or threatened species, populations or ecological communities, or their habitats, will be adversely affected because of the proposal? |
The subject site does not contain any critical habitat or threatened species, populations or ecological communities, or their habitats. |
|
Q9. Are there any other likely environmental effects of the planning proposal and how they proposed to be managed? |
The subject site is located in the vicinity of a ventilation facility for WestConnex motorway and an air quality impact assessment has been prepared in response. TfNSW have been also consulted regarding managing any excavation impacts of the future development associated with the presence of M4-M5 tunnel under the site. The Planning Proposal also include studies addressing contamination and noise matters. The proposed built form at FSR 5:1 would have detrimental amenity impacts on the adjoining properties and their future redevelopment potential. The proposal also does not sufficiently contribute towards tree planting and urban tree canopy cover to manage the urban heat island effect in this Inner West location. Consequently, it is recommended that the FSR be reduced to increase transitions, setback and deep soil/ tree planting opportunities on the site. This is discussed further in Section 4. |
|
Q10. Has the planning proposal adequately addressed any social and economic effects? |
The Planning Proposal does not include appropriate affordable housing contributions. The proposal will continue to provide employment opportunities on the ground floor and retains its existing mixed-use zoning in this location. Generally, no adverse social or economic impacts are identified. The site is located in an existing urban area with good access to a range of social infrastructure. Further consultation can occur with relevant Stage agencies as required by the Gateway Determination. |
|
Q11. Is there adequate public infrastructure for the planning proposal? |
The Planning Proposal is not expected to significantly increase demand for public infrastructure. Further consultation will be undertaken with the public authorities at the consultation stage to determine any significant impact on public infrastructure. |
|
Q12. What are the views of state and federal public authorities and government agencies consulted in order to inform the Gateway determination? |
As requested at pre-lodgement stage, the proponent consulted with Transport for NSW (TfNSW) regarding the M4-M5 tunnel beneath the site. In their correspondence with the proponent, Transport for NSW outlined parameters for any future development application but did not raise any conflicts with TfNSW. |
Site-Specific Matters
The Planning Proposal generally has strategic merit to provide much-needed infill housing in this location close to public transport and open space. It is generally aligned with Minister’s Statement of Expectations for Housing Australia and meets the strategic merit test for uplifting the site for additional residential uses. However, there are a number of site-specific issues which remain unresolved before the Planning Proposal can be supported. These primarily relate to inappropriate built form response, amenity impacts on the adjacent area, lack of affordable housing, lack of deep soil planting and traffic impacts as discussed in detail in the below section.
The Planning Proposal and associated documentation was referred to the AEDRP who also raised various concerns regarding the built form and inconsistencies with the ADG. The proponent was given an opportunity to revise the design scheme in response to Council officer’s and the AEDRP’s concerns. However, the revised built form/ planning proposal did not reduce the proposed FSR which could have ameliorated some of the design concerns and amenity impacts.
The below issues still remain unresolved in the current design scheme.
Inconsistencies with the Apartment Design Guide
Transition to surrounding areas
In considering this proposal, Council should be satisfied that the proposed IWLEP amendments can facilitate an appropriate built form transition to the neighbouring R1-zoned areas, particularly to the east opposite the site on Crown Street. Part 2C of the ADG states that secondary height controls should be considered to transition built form, for example “a step down in building height at the boundary between two height zones”.
The reference design scheme does not provide appropriate transitions to the low-density dwellings on Crown Street. The current PP creates a wall outlook along Campbell Street, between Princes Highway and the lower-density neighbourhood to the east, with no height variations (see images below). Council’s urban design officer has undertaken a peer review of the Proposal and reference scheme and identified inconsistencies with the ADG, including Part 2C.
Figure 11: Proponent scheme – from Princes Highway frontage
Figure 12: Proponent scheme – from Campbell Street frontage
It is recommended that the Planning Proposal be amended to provide appropriate transitions which will deliver an urban form that is more attuned to the surrounding neighbourhood and streetscape.
Council officers have tested an alternative scheme to provide appropriate ground floor and upper level setbacks to the surrounding properties as discussed further in this report. The increased setbacks result in decreased floorspace with a maximum FSR of 4:1 which could be permitted on this site.
Deep soil provision
The reference scheme identifies a total of approx. 177 sqm / 9% of total site area as deep soil zone (DSZ) located in three different areas. The ADG requires min. 7% Deep Soil Zone and recommends up to 15% deep soil planting for sites larger than 1500sqm.
The proposed deep soil zone areas in the reference design scheme do not meet the ADG criteria regarding minimum 6m dimension of deep soil planting for a site area >1,500 sqm, identified in ADG Part 3E.
This includes:
· Fronting Campbell Street - approx. 4m & 2m
· Crown Street & Campbell Street intersection – approx. 7m (cantilevered by approx. 2m)
· Crown Street – approx. 2m
Figure 13: Proponent’s proposed ground floor – deep soil plan
Council's alternative scheme recommends the following to meet the ADG requirement:
· Provide additional ground and upper-level setbacks to the massing at the corner of Crown Street and Campbell Street to allow a minimum 6m wide DSZ and is open to sky / not cantilevered, promoting tree growth.
· Provide additional setback to the massing fronting the DSZ at Campbell Street to meet the minimum 6m dimension.
It is recommended that the Planning Proposal be amended to increase the deep soil provision in consolidated location to meet ADG’s requirements for DSZ provision and enhance urban tree canopy cover.
Communal open space
The revised Planning Proposal package identifies a total of 630 sqm (33% of the site area) of communal space comprising 317 sqm (16.4%) of outdoor space and 313 sqm (16.2%) of indoor space. Part 3D of the ADG requires a minimum 25% of site area to be provided as communal open space. The ADG also identifies communal open space as open space that provides outdoor recreation opportunities for residents, connection to the natural environment and valuable ‘breathing space’ between apartment buildings. Objective 3D-1 of the ADG identifies “an adequate area of communal open space is provided to enhance residential amenity and to provide opportunities for landscaping”.
Although indoor communal floor space provides additional amenity for the residents, it should not count towards the overall communal open space component, per the ADG. In this instance, the provision of 16.4% of the site area as communal open space falls short of the ADG requirements.
The reference design scheme should be revised to meet the ADG minimum compliance requirements of communal open space (25%).
Inner West Local Planning Panel Advice
In accordance with Division 2.5 (2.19) of the EP&A Act 1979, the Planning Proposal was referred to the IWLPP on 25 March 2025. The IWLPP recommended the Planning Proposal be conditionally supported. Table 3 below summarises the IWLPP concerns and Council officer responses. The IWLPP Meeting Minutes are provided in Attachment 4.
Table 3: IWLPP Advice and Council Responses
|
IWLPP Advice |
Council Response |
|
1. In relation to the strategic merit of the Planning Proposal: a. There is strategic merit to the extent that the site is suitable for higher residential density which has the potential to increase housing supply. b. This potential is not unique to the subject site as numerous nearby sites have similar ability to accommodate more housing. There is no evidence that the potential of this site to increase housing supply will be realised in the short-term. c. The Panel is concerned that the Planning Proposal is premature because the potential of St Peters for future housing opportunities has not been adequately evaluated. d. There is also concern that it may be difficult to achieve the objectives of the Mixed-use Zone with the requested height and density, acknowledging that there are strategic objectives to retain employment uses in this zone |
The Panel’s concerns regarding the prematurity of the proposal are noted; however the site is well located and well serviced to provide new housing opportunities.
Council has undertaken a comprehensive review to update the IWLEP through Our Fairer Future Plan.
St Peters suburb has been identified for very limited housing opportunities due to the suburb predominantly industrial affected by high aircraft noise exposure and other constraints such as flooding and contamination.
Given that this Planning Proposal is proponent-initiated and has demonstrated strategic merit, Council officers are of the view that this should proceed to Gateway subject to demonstrating sufficient site specific merit through reduction in FSR and provision of affordable housing.
The reduction in FSR would also assist with providing appropriate transitions and setbacks to the surrounding sites, safeguarding them for their future development.
Regarding 1d, Council officers are satisfied that the current zoning of the site (MU1) is appropriate to allow the proposed mix of commercial / employment uses on the ground floor and residential above.
|
|
2. In relation to the site-specific merit of the Planning Proposal: a. There is an apparent lack of site-specific merit due to constraints on developing the site to the requested density. The principal constraints are: i. the height of buildings is restricted by the Sydney Airport flightpaths. ii. the extent of basement excavation is restricted by the motorway tunnel below the site. iii. to the north and east restrictions on building heights and setbacks are necessary due to the continuing presence of lower density housing. iv. vehicular access is limited to Crown Street b. The location of the site at a major road intersection generates potential amenity issues which could have negative impacts on future occupants. Traffic and aircraft noise are a significant issue at present. Access to natural ventilation is also compromised because of the noise conditions. An increase in residential dwellings would increase the number of occupants exposed to these adverse conditions. c. Despite these significant shortcomings, the Panel considers that there is the opportunity for these to be addressed by refining the contents of the Planning Proposal.
The site is also located at a major road intersection which generates potential amenity issues that could negatively impact the future residents. Noise from traffic and aircraft would also impact natural ventilation. |
The site constraints are acknowledged and this report recommends the Planning Proposal be amended to reduce the proposed FSR to 4:1, in consideration of those constraints. It also recommends that the proponent be required to update its evidence base and draft site-specific DCP to reflect this reduced control and to address the constraints of the site, potential impact on adjoining lower density zone, and the amenity of future residents.
Notwithstanding, these site constraints can be overcome through the above documentation and at a future development application stage and do not preclude the Planning Proposal, subject to changes, from proceeding to the Gateway Determination stage. |
|
3. In relation to building height: a. The proposed building height is the maximum permitted below the flight path restriction for Sydney Airport. If this is an appropriate maximum height there is no apparent need to apply a further statutory restriction on height for this site. b. The studies that have been conducted identified the need for varied heights across the site to take account of potential adverse impacts on adjoining land. As building separation requirements of the Apartment Design Guide (ADG) need to be satisfied, there must be differing heights across the site. It is not possible for the Panel to determine the most appropriate location for these changes in height. The locations for the height transitions must be determined by further study and these can be incorporated in a development control plan. c. Prescribing a single maximum height development standard over the entire site may very well give rise to a significant mismatch between maximum height and maximum FSR. d. It could be prejudicial to prescribe a maximum height prior to Council completing its strategic assessment of heights, and it could predetermine an inappropriate development standard for building height in this vicinity. e. There is no benefit in prescribing a height which already cannot be exceeded. Further, the potential for a lower height to be applied when the strategic studies are complete may encourage the immediate development of this site. f. The Panel recommends that the LEP building height map not allocate a maximum building height, for this site, at this time.
|
With regard to 3a, it should be clarified that the Sydney Airport OLS is not an absolute constraint on development and can be exceeded in consultation with the relevant Federal Government authorities. However, removal of the HOB control for the site would create uncertainty in the Planning Proposal assessment process and for the community.
Council officers recommend that the Planning Proposal be amended to include a maximum FSR of 4:1. Council’s expert design advice finds that this FSR would align with the proposed HOB of RL 51m (35m) and not result in any mismatch.
This report recommends the Planning Proposal, and the supporting Urban Design Report and draft site-specific DCP be updated. The latter should guide the design of buildings on the site to ensure an appropriate interfacing and transition to the neighbouring lower-rise residential areas to the north-east and east, including setbacks and building separation required in accordance with the ADG.
It is common practice to apply a single HOB control to a development site of this size and characteristics. Officers consider that it can function adequately alongside suitable site-specific DCP provisions.
Further, if required, this can be revisited post-exhibition after consultation with the community and relevant government authorities. |
|
4. In relation to floor space ratio: a. The applicant advised the Panel that the submitted request for a FSR of 5:1 is no longer being pursued, and that the recommendation of the Council Officers for a FSR of 4:1 is accepted. b. The Panel is not convinced that a FSR of 4:1 will produce a good design outcome, and therefore a lower FSR could be more appropriate. The potential to achieve this FSR needs to be tested by further urban design/architectural analysis by Council officers. Through this analysis it should be verified that all of the provisions of the ADG can be achieved, especially after taking account of the requirements to: i. ensure at least the ground floor is used for commercial premises or health services in accordance with the definition of shop top housing; ii. satisfy the objectives of the Mixed-use to promote employment uses, provide active street frontages, and minimise conflict with development in adjoining zones; iii. provide a minimum of 135 sq. metres of deep soil with a minimum dimension of 6 metres, and preferably 290 sq. metres, in accordance with Part 3E; iv. increase the boundary setback by an additional 3 metres along the eastern boundaries where there is a change in zone between the subject site and the lower density residential zone to the east and north, as specified in Parts 2F and 3F. This requirement applies because the boundary of the subject site delineates the change in zone. c. Further consideration needs to be given to the potential FSR for the land in the Mixed-use Zone further to the north along the Princes Highway. It is important that the FSR for the subject site does not prejudice or predetermine the FSR that will be applied to that land under some future housing strategy. |
A thorough level of design testing has been undertaken by Council’s urban designer internally. This testing has indicated that a maximum FSR of 4:1 can produce an ADG-compliant development outcome on the site.
Further urban design analysis should be undertaken by the proponent post-Gateway Determination, to reflect the recommended changes. This analysis should also address the Panel’s concerns.
This work is recommended to be undertaken post-Gateway Determination, as it enables the proposal to progress to DPHI for review while giving it a level of support. Delaying the Planning Proposal to request the proponent provide this information upfront would delay the assessment further and not provide added certainty to the proponent regarding the level of support.
It is therefore recommended that the Planning Proposal proceed to Gateway assessment stage, with the reduced FSR of 4:1, and the proponent be required to submit revised supporting documentation following issuing of a Gateway Determination, to demonstrate how the revised proposal would achieve ADG compliance and can appropriately resolve the Panel’s concerns. |
|
5. In relation to affordable housing: a. The Panel notes the offer of the applicant to provide 10% of apartments as affordable housing for a period of ten (10) years. The Panel appreciates that this is not consistent with Council’s adopted Policy which requires the provision of 15% affordable housing in perpetuity. b. A Planning Proposal provides the opportunity for public benefit through the provision of affordable housing which should be utilised in this instance. c. The Panel does not support the Council Officer’s recommendation for the provision of 2% of new residential gross floor area as affordable housing. Given the proponent’s offer, the Panel recommends that at least 10% of new residential gross floor area on the site be provided as affordable housing in perpetuity.
|
Following receipt of the IWLPP’s advice, the proponent submitted an economic feasibility report which confirms that redevelopment of the site would not be viable with an affordable housing contribution greater than 2% (refer to Attachment 5).
The outcomes of this feasibility analysis are also generally consistent with the feasibility analysis undertaken recently by Council officers for other projects.
The Panel has recommended that the FSR of the site be reduced and that the affordable housing contributions be increased which would render this project unfeasible and unlikely to proceed to construction.
In line with the recommendations of this report, Council officers recommend proceeding with a site-specific IWLEP 2022 provision requiring a minimum 2% affordable housing contribution. |
|
6. Subject to the matters above, the Panel recommends that Council forward the Planning Proposal to the NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure for Gateway assessment subject to the following amendments: a. The maximum FSR as determined from the urban design analysis/architectural analysis required in 4.b. above, up to a maximum of 4:1. b. The maximum building height not be specified. c. Incorporation of an additional site-specific local provision requiring at least 10% of new residential Gross Floor Area (GFA) on the site be provided as affordable housing, managed by a tier one registered community housing provider in perpetuity.
|
For reasons outlined above, Council officers recommend that: · a maximum FSR of 4:1 should proceed on this site, and · a site-specific local provision be included requiring that 2% of new residential FSR be provided as affordable housing in perpetuity.
Council’s urban design advice has found that a maximum FSR of 4:1 can reasonably achieve an ADG-compliant development scheme. It is therefore recommended that the Planning Proposal be amended to include this revised FSR control.
Council officers also recommend that the proposed HOB control proceed as written for reasons outlined above.
Finally, it is recommended requiring at least 2% of new residential Gross Floor Area (GFA) be provided as affordable housing, managed by a registered community housing provider in perpetuity. The specifics of this clause, including whether it can be limited to apply only to tier one providers, can be discussed with Parliamentary Counsel at final drafting, should this proposal proceed to that stage.
|
|
7. The Panel recommends that Council request a Gateway Determination from the Minister for the amended Planning Proposal which, if supported, contain Gateway conditions that the following information be provided or updated prior to community consultation: a. Planning Proposal documents including references to reduced FSR, GFA, and number of dwellings, and at least 10% affordable housing; b. Urban design report reflecting the output from the analysis at 4b above illustrating the built form outcome with the amended FSR, heights and applicable setbacks; c. Traffic Impact Assessment and strategic-level green travel plan outlining mechanisms for delivering effective mode shift on the site; d. Updated draft site-specific amendment to Marrickville Development Control Plan 2011 and draft Inner West Development Control Plan 2025; and e. A sustainability strategy to demonstrate a commitment to exceed minimum sustainability requirements established by standards such as NABERS, BASIX, or NatHERS. |
Council officers note the Panel’s advice, but recommend proceeding with the Planning Proposal with the amendments proposed as outlined above. The proposal has strategic merit and, subject to changes discussed in this report, can also demonstrate sufficient site-specific merit, while also contributing to new housing and jobs in the Inner West in a well-serviced location.
It is agreed that a future Gateway Determination for this proposal should include conditions requiring updated Planning Proposal, Urban Design Report and draft site-specific DCP, but reflecting Council’s recommended LEP amendments.
It is also agreed that a Gateway condition be sought requiring a Sustainability Strategy be prepared to demonstrate commitment to exceeding these sustainability standards. The relevant provisions can then be adopted in the draft DCP. |
Conclusion
Subject to recommended amendments as detailed in this report, the Planning Proposal is considered to have sufficient strategic and site-specific merit. It is recommended that the proposal, as amended, be submitted to DPHI for Gateway assessment and that the Gateway Determination impose conditions to revise the proposal package prior to beginning statutory public exhibition.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
Attachments 1-5 have been published separately in the Attachments Document on Council’s Website https://www.innerwest.nsw.gov.au/about/the-council/council-meetings/current-council-meetings
|
1.⇨ |
Planning Proposal for 75-85 Crown Street and 116 Princes Highway, St Peters - Published Separately on Council’s website |
|
2.⇨ |
Council Letter to proponent including Council and AEDRP feedback - Published Separately on Council’s website |
|
3.⇨ |
Inner West Local Planning Panel Minutes - Published Separately on Council’s website |
|
4.⇨ |
Council Assessment Checklist - Published Separately on Council’s website |
|
5.⇨ |
Proponent Feasibility Report on Affordable Housing Provision - Published Separately on Council’s website |
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Use of recycled plastics in Inner West procurement and projects
Prepared By: Helen Bradley - Manager Resource Recovery Planning
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council endorse the Sustainable Procurement Working Group investigation of priority areas for use of recycled materials, highlighting the use of recycled soft plastics in capital works projects, with an update report to the December 2025 Council meeting.
2. That Council require that tenders include recycled content materials (e.g. recycled crushed glass, recycled plastic and crumb rubber) in infrastructure and civil works projects where proven technology, and specifications are available.
3. That Council amend procurement processes to consider lifecycle costs of products when comparing pricing for recycled content alternatives.
4. That Council write to relevant state and federal ministers to advocate for the inclusion of recycled content and circular economy requirements as standard practice in government tenders and infrastructure projects.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
1: An ecologically sustainable Inner West 5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The use of recycled plastics by Inner West Council has a strong strategic alignment through Council’s Zero Waste Strategy – which has specific targets and actions around plastics including
· Avoidance of single-use plastics in Council operations and at Council events
· Increasing Council procurement of recycled materials including plastics
· Reduction in litter by 60% by 2030 (and plastic litter specifically by 30% by 2025)
Enabling the Inner West community to engage in recycling soft plastics is another strategic direction and is facilitated directly by council via a doorstep collection funded by Council HomeCycle - Inner West Council. Another significant plastics recycling opportunities is via Woolworths drop-off at selected stores Discover - Woolworths Online.
The REDcycle soft plastics recycling program crashed in 2022 and has recently recommenced in a pilot scheme, including supermarkets in the Inner West. A major factor in the collapse of the scheme, and a fundamental economic inhibitor in the market is the demand for recycled plastic products. In addition to other steps that it has taken to address the soft plastics problem, Council can play a positive “model developer” role in the market by ensuring that we stimulate demand through our procurement process.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 18 February 2025, Council resolved the following in part:
2. That Council receive further report in April 2025 outlining:
a) projects where recycled plastic aggregate is used in base products, including but not limited to play equipment, road base, footpaths and concrete
b) a full list of further opportunities and project types where plastic aggregate can be incorporated
c) details on where plastic aggregate is used in such projects from other Australian and international jurisdictions; and
d) a decision for councillors regarding the application of a procurement weighting for the use of plastic aggregate and/or a target for the number of projects where this will be used and/or any other opportunities to expand the use of plastic aggregate in Inner West projects.
This report summarises recommended actions in response to the above resolution.
DISCUSSION
Council staff have formed a Sustainable Procurement Working Group. Procurement processes and policies have been reviewed with to ensure alignment with the objectives of Council, about soft plastics and broad issues including Climate Change.
Areas that require improvement for these objectives to be implemented successfully include:
· Amendment of the policy to more expressly reflect Council’s intention
· Identifying projects for improved procurement processes or materials which are appropriate for direct substitution with recycled materials and, finally
· Raising staff awareness and compliance with revised procurement policies
Having regard to the first point, it is noted that Council’s Procurement Policy was updated in 2024 to require a mandatory weighting of 15% to sustainability. However, it could also include requirements for recycled content including plastics where applicable.
Other opportunities identified through the Sustainable Procurement Working Group include:
· Infrastructure and civil works projects
· Street furniture, bollards, benches, picnic tables and plastic decking
· Drainage systems and building materials
· Stationary, office fit outs, carpets etc.
· Using recycled plastics where fleece or plastic based uniforms are used
Priority Projects
The following are priority projects that under investigation or early days of review and consideration, and all demonstrate success in the recycling of soft plastics.
Paving the Way – Southern Sydney Region of Councils
Inner West is part of the SSROC regional contract Paving the Way, which has a focus on using recycled materials in infrastructure projects, developing guidelines and providing specifications to easily embed this in procurement practices.
· Phase 1 involved using crushed glass fines as sand replacement in infrastructure projects such as footpaths. Currently 4.2% of Inner West asphalt is constituted of recycled crush glass via participation in Paving the Way.
· Phase 2 targeted Plastics and Rubber with trials of crumb rubber in roads across the region. IWC is participating with SSROC who are leading the technical specifications with industry for use of recycled rubber road pavement with completion by June 2025
· Phase 3 will be use of soft plastics in civil works. An asphalt product called “Reconophalt” that has a recycled soft plastic component is now available and two other SSROC Councils (Sutherland and Woollahra) have recently used this product.
Mobile Garbage Bins in active use at all residential properties for garbage, recycling and FOGO are a key Council use of recycled plastics. In late 2024 SULO revealed that all their bins, used across the Inner West, are made from 100% recycled plastic. At the end of their useful life (7-10 year lifespan) bins are returned to SULO for recycling into new bins.
Plastics in roads projects
Plastic in roads need to be used in accordance with road engineering specifications. Roads containing waste plastic may perform as well as traditional roads. (Ann Parson 2021) How Paving With Plastic Could Make a Dent in the Global Waste Problem - Yale e360
Examples internationally include “PlasticRoad” (cycle path) in the Netherlands containing the recycled plastic equivalent of over 218,000 plastic cups. Its design outperforms traditional asphalt roads through performance and sustainability benefits, lasting up to three times longer without cracks or potholes. It is permeable allowing drainage and is hollow allowing for underground pipes and cables. The world’s first plastic road opens in the Netherlands
The costs of a similar project under Australian conditions have not been estimated.
Figure 1 and 2: PlasticRoad in Zwolle, Netherlands
Other projects underway that incorporate recycled content and circular economy include;
· FOGO Compost – Buying back Inner West FOGO compost from Topsoil created from residents recycling food and garden organics through the kerbside recycling service. Following the trial at Richard Murden Reserve for National Tree Day 2024, Council is procuring 40 tonnes of compost meeting the platinum Australian Standard (AS4454) for Inner West parks and nurseries
· Catering – investigating suppliers aligned to environmental and social values such as reusable packaging (zero waste), food rescue, local and social enterprise providers. Council events which “walk the talk” by not providing single use plastic containers as standard practice are strongly recommended, and increasingly implemented.
· Cleaning consumables – reducing or avoiding toxic chemical use in cleaning products and incorporating natural cleaning products.
Other Council resource recovery and reuse projects underway include:
· Paint reuse – pilot which commenced in December 2024 with Circle Paints who reuse paints collected at the St Peters CRC. Council has commenced buying back paint including for a mural at the Sustainability Hub
· Corporate reuse of materials – reuse within council to improve corporate behaviours and reduce expenditure on internal assets already available across council including office furniture and stationery.
Sustainable Procurement Opportunities at Inner West
The Sustainable Procurement Working Group recommend focusing on targeting materials and opportunities to buy recycled materials based on spend, specifications demonstrating fit-for-purpose and opportunity rather than rigid targets by material types.
Following the revisions to Council’s procurement strategy, all evaluation of tenders and quotes include schedules and information relating to the sustainability criteria. This new procurement procedure and the procurement policy are aligned to the Inner West Sustainability and Zero Waste strategies. Controls and monitoring are in place to ensure the commitment is reflected in decision making, sending strong market signals to potential suppliers regarding Inner West’s circular economy priorities.
Suppliers are also categorised on VendorPanel with Supplier Intelligence Badging. The sustainability badge is awarded to suppliers on the VendorPanel platform who meet certain sustainability criteria. This helps promote responsible procurement by making it easier for buyers to select environmentally and socially responsible vendors.
Inner West Circular Economy Roundtable
Council hosted a Circular Economy Roundtable on 27 May 2025 for organisations and individuals active in the local waste avoidance reuse, repair and recycling community to develop a roadmap and connect our community to the new Circular Economy Grants. Circular economy grants - Inner West Council
At this forum, Councillors and staff heard from industry leaders and senior agency staff from organisations such as the NSW EPA. Opportunities and barriers in the Inner West circular economy were canvassed and a new Council network was developed.
Conclusion
Council’s Sustainable Procurement Working Group is investigating the priority projects detailed above for use of recycled materials, especially the use of recycled soft plastics in capital works projects. An update report to Council on feasible projects for implementation is planned later this year once feasibility has been examined.
Further, it is recommended that Council’s procurement processes are amended to require that tenders for infrastructure and civil works projects must include recycled materials where proven technology, and specifications are available (such as Paving the Way). Procurement processes should also consider lifecycle costs of products when comparing pricing for recycled content alternatives.
Finally, it is recommended that Council advocate to its State and Federal counterparts for the inclusion of recycled content and circular economy requirements as standard practice in government tenders and infrastructure projects
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no immediate financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report. Any future financial implications (procurement costs) will be included in the update report to Council.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Recreational Needs Survey for Girls, Young Women and Gender Diverse People
Prepared By: Aaron Callaghan - Parks Planning and Ecology Manager
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council endorse the draft survey and engagement framework outlined in this report and commence community engagement on a research survey which will gather information on the recreational needs, preferences, and barriers faced by women, girls, and gender-diverse people aged 12–24 in the Inner West community. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities 5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
At the Council meeting held on 3 December 2024, Council resolved the following:
That Council officers report to the March 2025 Ordinary Council Meeting with a draft survey for consultation with local girls, young women and young gender diverse people about their recreational needs and preferences for new facilities. This should include a plan for how the survey would be widely promoted and disseminated, including use of social media and local organisations and networks.
This report outlines the process to develop and implement a draft survey designed to understand the recreational needs and preferences of, and barriers experienced by, girls, young women, and gender-diverse individuals aged 12 to 24. The engagement framework has been developed by Council’s Office of Sport in consultation with Council’s Community engagement team.
For the purposes of the development of a survey, the age group is defined as between the ages of 12-24 as ‘Youth’ by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
BACKGROUND
The proposed engagement framework is informed by two important strategies which have already been adopted by Council and which have been developed with evidence-based research into recreation and open space needs within the Inner West, this being the Inner West Recreation Needs Study (2018) and the Inner West Recreation Strategy and Action Plan (2023-32).
Additional studies which have been used to inform the survey questions include “Factors Relating to Women and Girls’ Participation in Sport (2023”), and the “AusPlay National Sport and Physical Activity Participation Report (2022)”. Both of these reports provide critical insights into participation trends, barriers, and preferences specific to girls, young women, and gender-diverse individuals.
Existing Strategic Direction and Additional Research Papers
The following documents have assisted in developing the approach used to create the questionnaire.
Recreation Needs Study: A Healthier Inner West (2018): Informed by extensive community and stakeholder engagement (more than 2,000 points of engagement): Recreation studies and plans - Inner West Council
Key Insights:
· Enhance the visibility and participation of women and girls in recreation through programs and improved facilities
· Address safety concerns and limited access to formal sports opportunities for women and girls
· Women favour passive, active, and personal fitness activities, while men more often engage in social, organised, and elite sports
Recreation Strategy and Action Plan (2023–32): Informed by extensive community and stakeholder consultation, building on the Recreation Needs Study (2018) and aligning with broader strategic frameworks: Recreation Strategy and Action Plan 2023 | Your Say Inner West
Key Insights:
· Walking and flexible, unstructured recreation are the most popular activities, particularly among women and girls
· Indoor facilities are particularly important for accommodating recreation during adverse weather conditions and for activities favoured by women, girls, and older adults
· A lack of indoor facilities for flexible, non-competitive participation was noted, with an increasing demand for spaces that support yoga, Pilates, and fitness classes
· Women and girls face barriers such as limited open space, safety concerns, and financial constraints, which reduce participation in formal and structured sports
· Inclusive and accessible recreation opportunities are critical, with a focus on improving park amenities, safety measures, and diverse program offerings to cater to varying needs and preferences
The demand for programs and facilities that blend social connection with physical activity is increasing, particularly for women and girls
Factors Relating to Women and Girls’ Participation in Sport (2023) – Victoria University
This was an engagement survey of over 5,000 women and girls from across Victoria.
Key Insights:
· Women and girls value fun, enjoyment, and social interaction in sport
· Barriers include cost, cultural stigma, and lack of inclusive spaces
· Recommendations include creating culturally tailored programs and offering flexible, non-competitive options
AusPlay National Sport and Physical Activity Participation Report (2022) – Australian Sports Commission this engagement surveyed over 75,100 women aged 15+, including 8,700 young women aged 15–19.
Key Insights:
· Non-sport activities such as walking, yoga, and fitness dominate participation
· Time constraints, cost, and safety are the most significant barriers
· Health benefits and social connection are primary motivators
Community Engagement Plan
It is proposed that Council move forward with consideration of a draft survey which has been designed to gather useful information on the recreational needs, preferences, and barriers faced by women, girls, and gender-diverse people aged 12–24 in the Inner West community.
The primary objectives of the survey are to:
· Identify participation trends in both sport and non-sport activities
· Understand barriers, including cost, safety, time, and cultural factors, that limit participation
· Gather preferences for program types, facility features, and recreational spaces
· Ensure inclusivity by capturing input from underrepresented groups, including CALD and LGBTQIA+ communities.
The proposed Methodologies for collecting data are
· Online Survey (and Social Media Campaign)
· Hosted on the Your Say Inner West platform.
· Accessible via QR codes distributed through local sport clubs, schools, universities, libraries, community centres, and social media campaigns.
· Social Media campaign with links to survey.
· Email distribution to key stakeholder groups.
· In-Person Engagement
· Purpose: Engage with the community in informal settings.
· Activities
· Pop-up stalls at parks, bay run, recreation and aquatic centres, youth centres, libraries and at community events and customer service pop-up stalls
Key Topics and Themes
The survey will include the following key themes:
1. Participation Levels
Sustained participation in sport and recreation is essential to supporting the health and wellbeing of the Inner West community. Research highlights a decline in participation during key life stages, particularly adolescence, early adulthood, and parenthood. Monitoring these patterns enables targeted responses to support ongoing engagement and reduce periods of inactivity.
2. Use of Local Facilities and Spaces
Inner West residents utilise a wide range of parks, sporting grounds, and open spaces to support both organised and informal recreation. While flexible, unstructured use of spaces such as walking paths and parks is highly valued, gaps in facilities, safety concerns, and limited inclusive programming can restrict participation, particularly for women, girls, and diverse communities. Understanding how local spaces are accessed and experienced informs future planning and investment.
3. Activity Preferences
Recreation preferences across the Inner West reflect the need for a balanced offering of traditional sport, fitness, and informal activities. Younger people seek opportunities that prioritise social connection, skill development, and flexible participation. Delivering diverse, accessible programs that respond to evolving community needs is essential to supporting long-term participation.
4. Motivations for Participation
Health, wellbeing, and social connection are key drivers of participation in sport and recreation. Inclusive and welcoming environments that balance enjoyment with skill progression are critical to retaining participants and supporting active lifestyles across all demographic groups.
5. Barriers to Participation
Barriers to participation persist across the Inner West, including financial pressures, safety concerns, time constraints, and transport access. Participation is also impacted by key life transitions, such as entering the workforce or starting high school/ higher education. Addressing these barriers through targeted, inclusive, and affordable initiatives is vital to supporting equitable access to recreation opportunities.
6. Facility and Program Needs
Contemporary recreation planning prioritises inclusive, multipurpose, and adaptable facilities that meet the needs of a diverse community. There is growing demand for spaces that support both organised and informal use, alongside increasing interest in non-traditional and emerging activities. Facilities that incorporate social spaces, indoor environments, and flexible programming models will be essential to meeting current and future recreation needs.
Incentives and Prizes:
To boost engagement and encourage participation, it is recommended that the survey should include incentives for young people to participate. This could include:
· Gift Cards: Participants who complete the survey will go into a draw to win gift cards for popular retailers.
· Community Recognition: Highlight participants’ contributions through local Active Inner West Newsletter or Council social media channels.
· Membership to Aquatic Centres: Visit passes for completing survey including membership or passes to Council aquatic centres and gyms
Draft Online Survey
A draft online survey utilising the resources highlighted above has been developed with the assistance of staff engagement specialists, specifically from within Council’s Community Engagement Team. In terms of delivering the survey assistance from the Aquatic and Recreation Services as well as within the Parks Teams and Office of Sport will assist in survey distribution.
Help shape the future of Recreation in the Inner West!
“We want to hear from young women, girls and gender diverse people aged 12-24 about what recreation, sports, and activities you enjoy and what could be better in the Inner West. Your feedback will help create better spaces and programs for young people like you!”
|
Question |
Response Options |
|
|
Demographic Questions |
||
|
How would you describe your gender? |
- I use a different term: Agender – I see gender as invalid and prescribe myself no gender. Culturally, I experience and project the gender of a man. - I use a different term: Genderfluid - I use a different term: Xe/xi - Women or female - Man or male - Non-binary - Prefer not to say |
|
|
How old are you? |
- Under 12 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - Over 18 |
|
|
Which suburb in the Inner West do you spend most of your time in? |
- Leichhardt - Marrickville - Ashfield - Newtown - Dulwich Hill - Balmain - Haberfield - Rozelle - Lilyfield - Croydon - Stanmore - Summer Hill - Camperdown - Tempe - Lewisham - Annandale - Enmore - Balmain East - Croydon Park - Petersham - Sydenham - St Peters - Birchgrove |
|
|
Recreational Needs and Preferences |
||
|
Provide background to terminology including definitions for:
· Sport-related activities (Swimming, Cycling, Football, Netball, Tennis, Basketball, Running, Athletics, Cricket, Australian Football, touch football, Oztag, Golf etc.)
· Non-sport-related Activities (Walking, Fitness/Gym, Bushwalking, Exergaming, Yoga, Pilates, Recreational Dancing etc.)
Note: Terminology relating to sport and non-sport activities, as well as participation barriers and motivations, have been adapted from the Australian Sports Commission National Sport and Physical Activity Participation Report 2022. |
||
|
How many times per week do you participate in sport or non-sport physical activity or exercise? |
Zero 1-2 times per week 3-4 times per week 5 or more times per week |
|
|
Do you participate in any sport or non-sport activities at places in the Inner West? If yes, which ones?" |
Include common examples of recreation spaces
(e.g. Parks, Sporting Grounds, Fitness Centres, Aquatic Centres, Walking and Running Trails, Sport and Recreation Centres, Dance studios)
Multiple choice tick boxes (plus open-ended response box) |
|
|
What sport or non-sport physical activities or exercise do you enjoy the most?
|
Include examples of common sport and non-sport or exercise related activities.
(include examples as above)
Multiple choice tick boxes (plus open-ended response box) |
|
|
What motivates you to participate in sport or non-sport physical activity or exercise? |
Include examples of common sport and non-sport or exercise related activities.
(e.g. Physical health or fitness, Fun/Enjoyment, Psychological/mental health/therapy, to be outdoors/enjoy nature, social reasons).
Multiple choice tick boxes (plus other open ended response box)
|
|
|
What stops you from participating in sport or non-sport physical activity or exercise? |
Include common barriers to participation.
(e.g. not enough time/other commitments, not a priority, poor health/injury, increasing age/too old, have a physical job)
Multiple choice tick boxes (plus other open ended response box) |
|
|
If Council built new recreation facilities, what features would you like to see the most? |
Include common answers.
(e.g. indoor and outdoor spaces, multi-purpose, inclusive and accessible features, social and family-friendly spaces, safe and connected pathways, affordable access)
Multiple choice (plus other open ended response box). |
|
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Funding of approximately $5000 is required for the survey for promotional material and survey prizes and this can be accommodated for within existing budget.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Clontarf Cottage Refurbishment Update
Prepared By: Michael Craven - Projects Delivery Manager
Authorised By: Scott Mullen - Acting Director Property and Major Projects
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council endorse proceeding with the installation of the flexible enlarged kitchen.
2. That Council endorse delaying the works to make the cottage accessible for twelve months to allow time to monitor use of the cottage following upgrade to the kitchen and results of enhanced marketing.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Clontarf Cottage is part of Council’s community venues and is available for community use through Council’s website, however it has a very low utilisation rate of only 7%.
A marketing strategy has been developed and is being implemented to promote all of Councils local community venues across the Inner West, including Clontarf Cottage with most tasks completed in July 2025.
Council is currently in the planning/design phase for capital improvements to the roof, kitchen and heating/cooling and external landscaping of Clontarf cottage with a cost estimate for these works of $175,000.
Investigation of the feasibility and costs to provide accessible access to the cottage has progressed with a cost estimate for the works, excluding the kitchen of $334,000, noting this will require a Development Application and a timeframe of 18 months to complete.
Given the additional costs to undertake the accessibility works, and low utilisation, Capital Works will progress the installation of the corrugated iron roof and new kitchen by August 2025, and Venues will action the enhanced marketing and monitor usage for 12 months, and report back to Council in June 2026.
BACKGROUND
A historical cottage built in 1844, Clontarf Cottage (the cottage) was purchased by Council in 1974, and was restored for community use in 1988.
The cottage seats 50 people and is suitable for small community gatherings, meetings, celebrations, low impact events and activities, including weddings and functions, that can also utilise the outdoor spaces.
The cottage is small at 61m2, has two main rooms that are both dividable, a small kitchen with basic bar fridge and domestic stove, male and female toilets, and includes a variety of tables, and chairs and is currently heated by two oil heaters that are at the end of useful life.
The cottage offers the use of grounds at the front of the premises as part of the hire, however there is no accessible access from the grounds into the venue.
This venue is bookable daily from 8am to 11pm daily (including set up and pack down time) for hourly, day, evening, or whole day rates.
As this venue is located in a residential area and noise regulations apply, events deemed high impact are not permitted. Due to noise regulations, events must finish and have vacated by 11pm.
The cottage is located at the eastern end of Balmain Peninsular as soon in the below map and currently has a booking rate of 7% (2024).
At the Council meeting held on 3 December 2024 meeting, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council note that work is in preparation to replace the Clontarf Cottage roof shingles in the first quarter of 2025.
2. That Council install a new kitchen in Clontarf Cottage by August 2025 that can be used for small scale functions for the purpose of reheating food, storing cold items such as platters and drinks and reconfigure in a way that maximises bench space for food preparation. Including:
a) replacing the existing gas oven with an electric oven; and
b) replacing the small bar fridge with a full-size fridge.
3. That Council investigate energy efficient heating and cooling options for the main rooms with a report back to the March 2025 meeting.
4. That Council create a marketing strategy for Council community venues with a focus on an uptake in bookings for Summer 2025 and with a report back at the March 2025 meeting.
5. That Council investigate planning for disability access at Clontarf Cottage in advance of the 2025/26 capital works budget. Plans were previously drawn up that considered the heritage status of the building that may be utilised.
At the Council meeting held on 29 April 2025 meeting, Council resolved the following in part:
3. That Council requests that officers provide a confirmed timeframe for the implementation of the Marketing Strategy.
4. That Council notes that work is progressing toward the installation of a new kitchen scheduled for August 2025, and requests that as part of the design process, officers prepare an alternative design option that includes relocating the water heater and removing the cupboard to allow for an extended kitchen layout, with associated costings to be presented to the June Council meeting.
DISCUSSION
Marketing
The resolution called for a timeframe for the implementation of the marketing strategy that include:
|
Description |
Timeframe |
|
High-quality images, styled photoshoots, and updated marketing materials. |
July 2025 |
|
Highlight local suppliers and simplify event planning. |
August 2025 |
|
Enhance social media content, use targeted ads, and promote community engagement. |
July 2025 |
|
Collaborate with community groups, offer incentives, and host open days. |
July 2025 |
|
Ensure user-friendly booking process and up-to-date information |
July 2025 |
Refurbishment
Capital Works have evaluated quotes for the installation of timber shingles to the roof with a cost of $160,000. Following discussions with the Heritage Architect preparing the Heritage Exemption Certificate, Council’s Heritage Architect, and the Friends of Clontarf Community Group it has been agreed to progress with a corrugated iron roof with a cost estimate of $40,000, securing a saving of $120,000.
The planning/design phase for a new kitchen is in progress with the design intention to better support catering related to events and functions at the cottage. The April meeting resolution called for an alternate design to the kitchen that included the removal of the hot water system and use of the space to extend the usable area to the kitchen. This has now been incorporated into the design (Figure 1) and works are on track to be delivered by the end of August 2025 at a cost estimate of $50,000.
Figure 2 – Alternative Kitchen Design (Hot water relocated and kitchen extended)
At the same time Capital Works have received a high-level cost estimate from a Quantity Surveyor for works to make the cottage accessible from the rear of the building (Figure 3). The works required include:
· Raise internal floor level of rear extension to remove internal step and provide access to all rooms within the cottage.
· New compliant fully accessible toilet.
· Removal and replacement of the roofing over the back extension to improve structural integrity and weather protection.
· Extension and enclosure of the existing entry at rear to provide enhanced accessibility, shelter, and a more defined entrance.
· Construction of a new compliant external ramp providing accessible access to the upgraded rear entry.
Additional work would also be required to raise the proposed new kitchen to be installed by August 2025 to the new floor level it the accessibility works are to be undertaken,
The works required to make the cottage accessible have also been costed by the Quantity Surveyor with a cost estimate of $334,000.
Figure 3 – Alternative Kitchen Design (Hot water relocated and kitchen extended)
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There is an allocation of $485,000 as a part of the 2025/26 budget planning process for capital improvements to the cottage. This includes work associated with the roof repair, kitchen upgrade, and split system air conditioning and external landscaping works.
The proposed budget for the proposed new corrugated iron roof, kitchen, heating and cooling and external works is $105,000, and the cost estimate for the accessibility works is $334,000 (total $439,000).
Whilst there is sufficient money in the allocated budget to allow for all of the proposed works, the low utilisation of the cottage is a significant factor in progressing all of the work.
It is recommended that Capital Works progress the installation of the corrugated iron roof and new kitchen by August 2025, and Venues to action the enhanced marketing and monitor usage for 12 months, and a report brought back to Council in June 2026.
The actions outlined in the Marketing Strategy are being funded by operational budgets.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Local Government Remuneration Tribunal - Determination of Mayor and Councillor Fees 2025/26
Prepared By: Julian Sakarai - Acting Senior Manager Governance and Risk
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council sets Mayor and Councillor Fees, effective 1 July 2025, at the maximum level for a Metropolitan Large Council being:
a) Councillor Annual Fee - $34,820 b) Mayoral Additional Fee - $101,470
2. That
Council re-confirms the current Additional Fee for the Deputy Mayor, being
$10,000 of the Mayoral Additional Fee. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Local Government Remuneration Tribunal (Tribunal) has determined an increase of 3 per cent for councillor and mayoral fees for the 2025-2026 financial year, with effect from 1 July 2025. Sections 248 and 249 of the Local Government Act 1993 (Act) enable councils to fix and pay an annual fee to councillors and mayors from 1 July 2025, within the relevant range set in the Tribunal’s determination for the 2025-2026 financial year.
The purpose of this report is to recommend the setting of annual fees for Inner West Councillors and the Mayor at the maximum level for a Metropolitan Large council determined by the Tribunal for the 2025-2026 financial year.
BACKGROUND
The Tribunal is required by the Act to make an annual determination on the fees payable to councillors and mayors. On 17 April 2025, the Tribunal made its Annual Determination - Fees for Councillors and Mayors (Determination), which will take effect from 1 July 2025. The Determination is at Attachment 1.
As part of its annual determination process for the 2025-2026 financial year, the Tribunal invited submissions from individual councils, and Council provided its submission to the Tribunal in December 2024. In its submission, Council requested that the Tribunal consider the base fees paid to councillors and mayors in other states and to establish parity with other elected representatives across Australia. The submission expressed the view that the fees currently payable to councillors do not adequately compensate elected officials for the substantial time commitment involved with being a councillor.
DISCUSSION
Section 239 of the Act requires the Tribunal to determine the categories of Councils at least once every three years. In 2023, the Tribunal completed a review of categories and classified Inner West Council as a ‘Metropolitan Large’ council. The Tribunal will next review these categories in 2026.
The Tribunal has determined the fees for mayors and councillors in Metropolitan Large Councils as follows:
|
Category |
Councillor/Member Annual Fee |
Mayor/Chairperson Additional Fee* |
||
|
|
Minimum |
Maximum |
Minimum |
Maximum |
|
Metropolitan Large |
$21,120 |
$34,820 |
$44,840 |
$101,470 |
*The Mayor/Chairperson additional fee must be paid in addition to the fee paid to the Mayor/Chairperson as a Councillor/Member, in accordance with section 249(2) of the Act. Council has previously resolved to pay the Deputy Mayor a fee of $10,000 per annum. The legislation requires that any fee set for the Deputy Mayor is taken from the annual fee payable to the Mayor. It is at Council’s discretion to determine the fee payable to the Deputy Mayor, if any.
This report recommends that Council adopt the maximum fees set out by the Tribunal on the following basis:
• substantial size in geographic and population size of the Local Government Area;
• substantial responsibilities associated with the annual budget;
• the wide scope, level and range of services delivered by Council; and
• increased level of time and investment required for the Mayor and Councillors to fulfil their civic duties effectively.
Adopting the report recommendations will ensure the remuneration of the Inner West Council elected officials reflects the scope of responsibilities to undertake their civic duties in a large Council.
Superannuation Contribution Payments
The payment of superannuation to the Mayor and Councillors is not automatic or mandatory, and pursuant to 254B(4)(a) of the Act a council must pass a resolution prior to making superannuation contribution payments.
At the Council meeting held on 10 May 2022, Council resolved the following:
That Council resolves for the Mayor and Councillors to receive superannuation contribution payments from 1 July 2022, in accordance with Section 254B of the Local Government Act 1993.
Superannuation is payable in addition to councillor fees. The superannuation contribution payment is paid at the same intervals as the annual fee is paid to Councillors.
Response to Council’s submission
In the Determination, the Tribunal notes that the current remuneration structure continues to be a key issue of concern raised in submissions. In particular, the roles of councillor and mayor have changed significantly over time, but remuneration has not increased accordingly.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The 3 per cent increase has been accounted for the in the 2025/26 Budget.
|
1.⇩ |
Local Government Remuneration Tribunal Annual Determination 2025/26 |
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Local Government NSW Board Election and Annual Conference 2025
Prepared By: Julian Sakarai - Acting Senior Manager Governance and Risk
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council nominate Councillors to attend the 2025 Local Government NSW (LGNSW) Conference.
2. That Council determine the 9 voting delegates for the LGNSW Board Election.
3. That Council determine the 9 voting delegates for voting on motions at the 2025 LGNSW Conference.
4. That a further report be submitted to the 19 August 2025 Council meeting which is to include the LGNSW Motions Submissions Guide (and the Conference Program) to assist Councillors who wish to submit any motions for consideration at the Conference.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Local Government New South Wales Annual Conference (Conference) will be held at Penrith from Sunday 23 to Tuesday 25 November 2025 and Council is entitled to nine (9) voting delegates.
As 2025 is a Board election year, voting for the LGNSW President and Director positions will also take place at the Conference.
The purpose of this report is to provide information in relation to the Conference, information about voting for delegates and motions at the Conference, and relevant deadline dates.
Council is required to determine its voting delegates for both voting on motions and voting at the Board election, and to identify any other Councillors wishing to attend in a non-voting capacity.
BACKGROUND
Local Government New South Wales (LGNSW) is the peak body representing New South Wales local councils. LGNSW holds an annual conference, which is the main policy making event for NSW Councils where issues are debated and motions put forward for consideration by delegates. The number of voting delegates that each paying member of LGNSW can appoint to the annual conference is based on a formula in the LGNSW Rules. Council is entitled to nominate nine (9) voting delegates at the Conference.
DISCUSSION
The report deals with the following two components:
1. The LGNSW Board election; and
2. LGNSW Annual Conference.
LGNSW Board Election
The opening date to nominate as a candidate in the LGNSW Board election is 30 September 2025 and the closing date is 21 October 2025. At the time of preparing this report, LGNSW advised that the Returning Officer will provide further advice on the lodgement of nominations and the procedure of the ballot at a later date. This will be provided to Councillors upon receipt.
Individual Councillors can nominate and this does not require a Council resolution.
Voting Delegates
Inner West Council is entitled to nine (9) voting delegates in the election and the names of the voting delegates are to be determined by Council resolution.
Members are required to advise LGNSW of the names and postal addresses of their nominated voting delegates for the Board Election by 7 November 2025.
LGNSW Annual Conference
This year’s Conference will be held at Panthers Penrith and the Western Sydney Conference Centre from Sunday 23 November to Tuesday 25 November 2025.
Voting Delegates
Inner West Council is entitled to nine (9) voting delegates for voting on motions at the Conference.
LGNSW needs to be advised of Council’s nine (9) voting delegates for the Conference by 30 September 2025 in order to access the early bird registration, or otherwise by the final deadline of 7 November 2025.
Motions for the Conference
Motions may be submitted for debate at the Conference that meet the criteria as outlined below. Members are asked to submit motions by 30 September 2025 to allow assessment of the motions and distribution of the Business Paper before the Conference. Under the LGNSW Rules, the latest date motions can be accepted for inclusion in the business paper is 26 October 2025.
LGNSW will distribute the Business Papers the week commencing 10 November 2025.
The LGNSW Board has resolved that motions will be included in the Business Paper for the Conference only where they:
1. are consistent with the objects of LGNSW (see Rule 4 of the Association’s rules),
2. relate to or concern local government as a sector in NSW and/or across Australia,
3. seek to establish or change policy positions of LGNSW and/or improve governance of the Association (noting that the LGNSW Board is responsible for decisions around resourcing any campaigns or operational activities, and any necessary resource allocations will be subject to the LGNSW budgetary process),
4. have a lawful purpose (a motion does not have a lawful purpose if its implementation would require or encourage non-compliance with prevailing laws),
5. are clearly worded and unambiguous in nature, and
6. do not express preference for one or several members over one or several other members.
If Councillors wish to adopt any motions for the upcoming conference they will need to be considered by Council and adopted at the 23 September 2025 meeting to meet the 30 September 2025 deadline. A further report will be submitted to the 19 August 2025 Council meeting which will also include the LGNSW Motions Submission Guide (which is not yet completed for the 2025 Conference) to assist Councillors who wish to submit any motions for consideration at the Conference.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Costs for the 2025 Conference have not yet been received, however based on previous conference costs, they are expected to be in the order of $1,200 per delegate for early bird registration (by 30 September 2025) and $250 for the optional Conference dinner. Costs associated with the Conference will be funded from the adopted budget.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Investment Report at 31 May 2025
Prepared By: Sajjad Ali - Acting Chief Financial Officer
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive, and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A monthly investment report is provided to Council detailing the investment portfolio in terms of performance, percentage exposure of the total portfolio, maturity date and changes in market value. During the month of May 2025:
· Council new investments:
- There were no new trades during the month.
· Council matured investments:
- There were no investment maturities during the month.
· Council is preparing for the maturity of further investments in June 2025, with interest rates declining compared with prior months.
· Council’s entire investment portfolio remains invested, with 52% of the portfolio in Non-Fossil Fuel Lending authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs), 10% in Socially Responsible Investments, and 38% in Green investments.
Council’s investments are reported monthly to Council in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993, the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021 and Council’s Investment Policy.
BACKGROUND
A monthly investment report is provided to Council detailing the investment portfolio in terms of performance, percentage exposure of total portfolio, maturity date and changes in market value.
The intention of investing Council’s funds is to seek the most favourable return available, whilst having due consideration of risk and security for that investment type and ensuring that its liquidity requirements are being maintained; with consideration given to the preservation of capital, liquidity, and the return on investment.
Preservation of capital is the principal objective of the investment portfolio. Investments are placed in a manner that seeks to ensure security and safeguard the investment portfolio. This includes managing credit and interest rate risk within identified thresholds and parameters.
Council determined to proactively invest in a non-fossil fuel investment portfolio.
Legislative Requirements
All investments are to comply with the following:
§ Local Government Act 1993;
§ Local Government (General) Regulation 2021;
§ Ministerial Investment Order dated 17 February 2011;
§ Local Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting;
§ Australian Accounting Standards; and
§ Division of Local Government Investment Policy Guidelines May 2010.
Council’s Socially Responsible Investments consist of Green Term Deposits/Floating Rate Notes from otherwise fossil fuel lending banks, such as CBA and Westpac and also long dated bond issues from a range of institutions and government agencies. These investments provide targeted funding to a wide range of green and socially responsible projects and initiatives. Council also utilises these investments to remain within the credit rating policy guidelines imposed by the NSW TCorp loan covenant requirements.
Certification
The Acting Chief Financial Officer, Sajjad Ali, as the Responsible Accounting Officer has certified that the investments listed in the attached report have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, Section 212 of the Local Government General Regulation 2021, and Council’s Investment Policy.
DISCUSSION
Council’s investments are held in various investment categories which are listed in the table below. Council’s market value investment portfolio size is $202.2M, unchanged compared with the prior month market value of $202.2M. All Socially Responsible Investments (SRI’s) are investments that comply with the Non-Fossil Fuel standards. Council’s portfolio during the month had a return of 4.67% pa, against the ‘AusBond Bank Bill Index’ Benchmark (4.12% pa) on a marked-to-market basis. For the past 12 months, the portfolio has returned 4.68% pa on a marked-to-market basis.
Financial markets rallied in May in the ‘risk-on’ environment with tariff negotiations seemingly heading in the right direction. Shares provided strong returns, whilst bond yields rose (valuations fell), with the market softening their expectations of a severe (US and global) recession, whilst marginally parring back the timing and the number of additional rate cuts to be delivered by central banks.
As interest rates rise/fall the dollar valuations of existing bonds rise/fall in the market. While Fixed Rate Bond’s (or Floating Rates Notes) market value may drop below its face value (or par value) during the life of a security, providing Council does not sell the security and the issuer is sound (which all of Council’s holdings are) then the bond’s market value will come back to the face value by the time it matures.
Changes in the value of our portfolio
New investments were:
· There were no new investments during the month.
Matured investments were:
· There were no investment maturities during the month.
With additional rate cuts and a global economic downturn priced in over 2025, investors should consider diversifying and taking an ‘insurance policy’ against a potentially lower rate environment by investing across 1-5 year fixed deposits and locking in rates above 4% p.a. (small allocation only).
Council’s entire investment portfolio remains invested, with 52% of the portfolio in Non-Fossil Fuel lending authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs), 10% of the portfolio in Socially Responsible Investments, and 38% of the portfolio in Green investments.
Council has two Emerald Investments that were purchased by the former Marrickville Council in July 2006 with maturity dates of August 2051 and August 2056 representing a market value $1.1M of Councils invested funds.
The attachments to this report summarise all investments held by Council and interest returns for the period ending 31 May 2025.
The Current Market value is required to be accounted for. The Current Market Value is a likely outcome if Council were to consider recalling the investment prior to its due date.
All investments held in the month of April were in accordance with the Local Government Act, Local Government Regulations, and the Inner West Council Investment Policy.
External / Internal Restrictions & Working Funds
Council’s external restriction reserves are funds that are restricted for use by external entities and have a specific purpose. Examples of such reserves include:
· Developer Contributions
· Grants
· Domestic Waste Reserve
· Stormwater Levy.
Internal Restriction reserves are reserves created internally by Council for a specific purpose. Examples include:
· Employment Leave Entitlements
· Investment Property Reserve
· Infrastructure Renewal Reserve
· Depreciation Contra Reserve.
External / Internal Restrictions & Working Funds
Other Investment Information
The chart below shows the average Term Deposit bids available for Council over the next five years across banks from different credit ratings.
In the deposit market, over May, at the very short end of
the curve (less than 6 months), the average deposit rates offered by the
domestic major banks fell by around 20bp compared to where they were the
previous month (April), after the RBA delivered another rate cut. At the longer
end of the curve (1-5 years), the average rates have fell by ~7bp compared to
where they were in April, with the market factoring up to another three rate
cuts over the next 12 months.
Domestic issues:
· The RBA cut the official cash rate by 25bp to 3.85% as widely expected, although the (slight) surprise was the admission that a 50bp cut was discussed. The Board assesses monetary policy after this cut to be “…somewhat less restrictive”, which opens the door for further rate cuts. The RBA’s statement has evolved in a dovish direction since April, with the final sentence now acknowledging both sides of the RBA’s dual mandate: “the Board is focused on its mandate to deliver price stability and full employment and will do what it considers necessary to achieve that outcome”.
· The monthly CPI indicator rose +2.4% y/y in April after +2.4% y/y in March. The annual trimmed mean was +2.8% y/y in April from +2.7% y/y in March.
· The unemployment rate was 4.1% in April, unchanged from March. The +89k surge in employment growth was alongside a 0.3% lift in the participation rate to 67.1%.
· Financial markets are still pricing up to three (3) additional rate cuts by year-end, which would take the official cash rate down to 3.10%, although the RBA is still cautious on the potential upside risks to inflation due to international market developments, particularly surrounding the ongoing tariff wars.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
|
1.⇩ |
Inner West Council Economic and Investment Portfolio Commentary - May 2025 |
|
2.⇩ |
Inner West Council Investment Report - May 2025 |
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Item No: C0625(1) Item 21
Subject: Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Upgrade - Monthly Project Update
Prepared By: Stuart Hull - Senior Manager Capital Works
Authorised By: Ryann Midei - Director Property and Major Projects
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
1: An ecologically sustainable Inner West 2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport 4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A project team with demonstratable experience and capability to successfully deliver the project has been formed, with a comprehensive project assurance and governance framework being applied to the project.
Stage 1 (mushroom pool and a new kids’ splash play area) is currently in the construction phase with the contractor taking site possession of the works area on 1 April 2025. Demolition works have been completed and excavation/sub grade works are underway. The works area is fenced, with the outdoor pools and indoor pools remaining operational. It is anticipated that Stage 1 will be completed in November 2025 (weather permitting).
Stage 2 (construction of new heated 8-lane 50m pool and a heated 25m pool) is currently in the design phase having its high-level scope confirmed at the April 2025 Council meeting by endorsement of the revised conceptual designs.
The proposed design was presented to the Access Local Advisory Group on 15 May 2025 with positive feedback received.
Planning and design activities have advanced significantly with the 50% design package reviewed by the project team.
Additional scope elements as identified in the April 2025 Council resolution are being investigated as a part of the next stage of design development. These findings will be included in the August monthly project update.
An Expression of interest (EOI) document was released to the market on the 31 March which closed on 28 April 2025. This process will deliver a short list of appropriately experienced and qualified contractors to participate in a selective tender process for the construction contract.
The EOI submissions have been evaluated and is the subject of a separate confidential report being tabled at the June 2025 Council meeting.
Stage 2 is due for completion in September 2027.
The LPAC upgrade is estimated to cost $55.5M which is accounted for in the draft Long Term Financial Plan for the 2025/2026 financial year.
BACKGROUND
With the existing 50m and dive pools reaching the end of their lifespan having been constructed in the early 1960s, Council is undertaking a comprehensive upgrade to revitalise the facility. This transformation will ensure the Aquatic Centre remains a vibrant and sustainable hub for the community for the next 50 years.
Council has appointed external consultants to provide Architectural design, Project Management and Project Assurance services with demonstratable experience and capability to successfully deliver the project.
In this regard, CO.OP Studios were appointed as the lead design consultant in mid-2023 to provide all architectural and engineering design services. CO.OP and their sub-consultant team have extensive experience around Australia though their network of state offices designing elite level sporting and aquatic centre projects.
Altus Group were appointed in late 2024 as the Project Managers and bring with them a wealth of experience in delivering aquatic centre projects.
There is a comprehensive project assurance and governance framework being applied to the project. In this regard, Council appointed Turner and Townsend (T&T) as the Project Assurance Consultant in late 2023 to have oversight of Stages 1 and 2 to ensure the highest standards of project integrity and risk management.
T&T have had an ongoing involvement through the development of the designs, project risk management, cost estimates and business case documents. This involvement will continue through to project completion and include monthly reporting to the Major Capital Projects Committee on the progress of the project.
Wilde & Wollard has been appointed as the projects Quantity Surveyor (QS) to prepare cost estimates. The QS will also have an on-going role through the construction stages in assessing progress claims and variation costs, and monitoring cash flows.
The project continues to be monitored in accordance with the Risk Management Plan and is reported to Governance forums including:
Project Control Group – Monthly
Major Capital Projects Committee – Monthly
Audit Risk and Improvement Committee – Quarterly
Inner West Council meetings – Monthly
At the Council meeting held on 29 April 2025, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council note the outcomes of the Engagement Report, including that the vast majority of respondents supported the stage 2 works to Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre, including three quarters of people who saw the plans in person.
2. That Council investigate options to include a small playground in the grassed area between the pools and the Bay Run, including funding sources.
3. That Council investigate options to include more shade over the concourse areas around the 50m and 25m pools, including funding sources.
4. That Council staff include the results of these investigations in their monthly reports to Council.
5. That Council adopt the revised conceptual designs in Attachment 2 of the Council report, for Stage 2 of the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre.
6. That Council endorse proceeding with detailed design development, planning approval and delivery stages for the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Upgrade Stage 2.
7. That Council note that the required funding detailed in the funding implications of this report for the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Upgrade is included in the draft 2025/26 operational plan and budget.
DISCUSSION
It is proposed to deliver the LPAC Upgrade generally in two stages due to construction practicalities and ensuring as many facilities at LPAC are open as possible during construction. It is also proposed to commence construction works during the winter months to minimise impacts on community pool users, sport groups, swim learners and LPAC operations.
Stage 1
This includes refurbishment of the outdoor kid’s pool known as mushroom pool and a new kids’ splash play area that will have a BBQ area, seating, and shade structures.
The indoor program pool hall will have HVAC upgrades, alongside the construction of a new fully electrified heating and filtration plant for the indoor program pool and kid’s pool.
Stage 1 works have now commenced with demolition works completed and excavation/sub grade works underway.
These works have uncovered some bonded asbestos containing materials present in the soils underlying the removed pavements. There is no risk to the public as the area is securely fenced off and during works that disturb these soils, air monitoring and dust controls will be in place.
The safety of the community, user of the open areas of the Aquatic Centre, site works and the environment are our highest priority during the upgrade works.
As such, Council officers have engaged an environmental scientist to oversee safety protocols, and work will be undertaken in accordance with the project’s environmental management plans.
Workers in the construction area are wearing coveralls and masks as they are dealing directly with the contaminated soil. Protective clothing is not needed for workers outside of the designated asbestos work areas.
Its worth noting that there is no impact to the operation of LPAC from these works and information signs have been posted on the construction fence.
The related works are progressing well and are expected to be completed mid-June 2025 (weather permitting).
A schedule of rates for this work was included in the contact, with the quantum of material determined based upon the finds and then applied to the schedule of rates to form its cost. There is a governance layer over this work, with appropriate checks by the project team. The cost implications from this work are currently being prepared by the contractor and will be assessed and valued by the Project Manager and QS in accordance with the construction contract.
In relation to other Stage 1 work, electrical trenching works to support the new plant have commenced. These works will extend from the rear turf area along the side Laneway, and progress around the front of the Centre to the new MSB location on Mary Street. Traffic management will be in place during these works. This will involve a single lane stop go arrangement, with some impact to the motorcycle parking in the vicinity of the Centre’s entrance on a temporary basis. These works will be completed, and traffic management removed, by mid June.
There have been several wet weather days over the period which have impacted the program.
Due to the above, it is anticipated that Stage 1 will now be completed in late November 2025 (weather permitting).
Stage 2
This includes the construction of new heated 8-lane 50m pool (1.1 to 1.8m deep) and a heated 25m pool (from zero to 2.1m depth with movable floor and accessible device), spectator seating and shade structures, new first aid, lifeguard, and storage rooms, new fully electrified pool heating system and filtration plants for 50 m and 25 m pools, accessibility lift and upgraded stairs to access the rear turfed area along with re-turfing, accessible pathway link and new picnic shelter.
Stage 2 is currently in the design phase having its high-level scope confirmed at the April 2025 Council meeting by endorsement of the revised conceptual designs.
The proposed design was presented to the Access Local Advisory Group on 15 May 2025 with positive feedback received. The two main areas of discussion that related to the pool upgrade were pertaining to:
· The inclusion of the portable “PoolPod 3” water access device and
· The inclusion of an additional set of stairs at the shallow end of the 50m pool as an alternative to allow users to access the pool without the need to rely solely on the ramp.
Planning and design activities have advanced significantly with the 50% design package reviewed by the project team.
The next stage of design development forms the 80% design package which considers the feedback provided at the Access Local Advisory Group meeting and through the 50% design development stage. A cost estimate report will also be prepared.
Additional scope elements as identified in the April 2025 Council resolution are being investigated as a part of the 80% design package. These findings will be included in the August monthly project update.
An Expression of interest (EOI) document was released to the market on the 31 March which closed on 28 April 2025. This process will deliver a short list of appropriately experienced and qualified contractors to participate in a selective tender process for the construction contract.
The EOI submissions have been evaluated and is the subject of a separate confidential report being tabled at the June Council meeting.
Stage 2 has the following high-level program:
· Complete 80% design for tender – August 2025
· Construction tender and evaluation – November 2025
· Contract award and execution – February 2026
· Construction commences on-site – May 2026
· Construction complete – September 2027
Leichhardt Park’s Plan of Management establishes the objectives and performance targets for Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre upgrade which includes implementing the conceptual plans.
The planning pathway approval for the project is via Section 2.73(2) of the State Environmental Planning Policy. This requires a Review of Environment Factors to confirm compliance and ensure the works are consistent with the Plan of Management and relevant environmental considerations prior to works commencing.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
An extensive value engineering and cost saving exercise has been undertaken to the project with oversight by the external Project Assurance Consultant and Quantity Surveyor.
The LPAC upgrade is estimated to cost $55.5M (Stage 1 - $9.78M and Stage 2 - $45.72M).
Council was recently advised of its successful application for the Federal Government’s Round 1 Community Energy Upgrade Fund grant in the amount of $1,054,000 for Stage 1 works.
The Chief Financial Officer has confirmed that funding to cover the estimated project cost is accounted for in the draft Long Term Financial Plan for the 2025/2026 financial year.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Leichhardt Oval Refurbishment - Monthly Project Update
Prepared By: Rocco Sergi - Acting Strategic Investments & Property Manager
Authorised By: Scott Mullen - Acting Director Property and Major Projects
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport 4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Leichhardt Oval Refurbishment is currently in the approval phase having its high level scope confirmed at the April 2025 Council meeting by endorsement of the final design concepts.
This resulted in a project scope to the:
· Western Grandstand Player Amenities
· Western Grandstand – modern facilities for spectators, sponsors and media
· Lower Seating Bowl – All new ‘stadium type’ seating to ensure safety and compliance
· New Northern Grandstand
A project team with demonstratable experience and capability to successfully deliver the project has been formed, with a comprehensive project assurance and governance framework being applied to the project.
The scope and concept design activities have been finalised, including costing analysis and value engineering to ensure that Council obtains the maximum value from the works, and preparation of planning approval documentation for the project.
The planning approval pathway for the finalised scope is considered to be a State Significant Development (SSD) as the estimated cost of development exceeds $30 million, with the NSW DPHI Planning and Public Spaces Team as the Consent Authority.
As such, a Secretary’s environmental assessment requirements (SEARs) is required to identify what information needs to be included in the environmental impact statement (EIS) of the application.
To obtain SEARs, an application and scoping report has been prepared by the project team and was lodged through the NSW planning portal on Thursday 29 May 2025.
The project has the following high level program:
· Project Planning Scope Confirmation – May 2025 (Completed)
· Planning Approval Consent – August 2026
· Complete 80% design for tender – August 2026
· Contract award and execution – September 2026
· Construction commences on-site – October 2026
· Construction complete – February 2028
The Quantity Surveyor has confirmed the Project Budget breakdown and the estimated costs for the design concepts are approximately $50M which is subject to further value engineering and a future procurement process to ensure that Council receives the best value for money from the project.
There is $40M funding allocated in the draft Long Term Financial Plan for the 2025/2026 financial year and Council will seek further State and Commonwealth grant funding opportunities and could potentially stage some of the works.
BACKGROUND
In October 2023 Inner West Council adopted the Leichhardt Oval Masterplan following extensive public engagement. The Masterplan was developed in partnership with Cox Architecture.
In June 2024, the Commonwealth, State and Local Governments formed a funding partnership to secure the future of Leichhardt Oval. The Commonwealth committing $20 million to the project, with the NSW Government and the Inner West Council investing $10 million each towards the upgrade.
Ernst and Young (EY) were appointed as project managers in August 2024 and Cox Architecture brought on board to finalise the concept designs for the upgrade.
EY have experience from overseeing big stadium projects including Allianz Stadium, CommBank Stadium and the new Penrith Stadium.
Cox Architecture bring a wealth of expertise when it comes to designing and redesigning some
of Australia’s most outstanding sporting venues.
A stakeholder workshop was held on 20 August 2024 with attendees from Wests Tigers, Sydney FC, NRL, NSWRL, Australian Professional Leagues, and APIA Leichhardt.
The workshop was facilitated by Cox Architects. The major themes from the workshop identified as priorities were the provision of female friendly players and officials’ amenities as well as a seating bowl upgrade.
At the Council meeting held on 29 April 2025, Council resolved the following:
That Council endorse the Leichhardt Oval renovation final design concepts April 2025 (Attachment 1) and proceed with preparing detailed plans in order to seek planning approval.
This resulted in a project scope to the:
· Western Grandstand Player Amenities
· Western Grandstand – modern facilities for spectators, sponsors and media
· Lower Seating Bowl – All new ‘stadium type’ seating to ensure safety and compliance
· New Northern Grandstand
There is a comprehensive project assurance and governance framework being applied to the project. In this regard, a Project Control Group has been established, with the General Manager as the Sponsor, that will have oversight of the project.
Council is also engaging a project assurance consultant to ensure project integrity and risk management. This engagement will include reviewing performance, costs, and timelines, providing improvement recommendations, and preparing monthly reports for Inner West Council throughout the project.
The project continues to be monitored in accordance with the Risk Management Plan and is reported to Governance forums including:
Project Control Group – Monthly
Major Capital Projects Committee – Monthly
Audit Risk and Improvement Committee – Quarterly
Inner West Council meetings – Monthly
DISCUSSION
The Leichhardt Oval Refurbishment is currently in the approval phase having its high level scope confirmed at the 29 April 2025 Council meeting by endorsement of the final design concepts.
The scope and concept design activities have been finalised, including costing analysis and value engineering to ensure that Council obtains the maximum value from the works, and preparation of planning approval documentation for the project.
The planning approval pathway for the finalised scope is considered to be a State Significant Development (SSD) as the estimated cost of development exceeds $30 million, with the NSW DPHI Planning and Public Spaces Team as the Consent Authority.
As such, a Secretary’s environmental assessment requirements (SEARs) is required to identify what information needs to be included in the environmental impact statement (EIS) of the application.
To obtain SEARs, an application and scoping report has been prepared by the project team and was lodged on the NSW planning portal on Thursday 29 May 2025.
The scoping report will be published online and seek advice from key government agencies during the preparation of the SEARs. The department may also visit the site and surrounds.
The SEARs will be published online within 28 days of the application being lodged. The Planning Secretary may revise the SEARs at any time.
It is estimated that it will take until June 2026 to have a determination of the SSDA.
Once Council has received the Secretary’s environmental assessment requirements, a consultant team (currently being procured) will prepare the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that is required to be submitted seeking consent for the refurbishment.
At the same time, Council will engage a Principal Desing Consultant that will lead a team of consultants including structural, electrical, mechanical, hydraulic, planning, heritage, accessibility and BCA to undertake the design development and schematic design phase. This will form the 80% design package.
Council will seek an Expression of Interest for building contractors at the end of 2025 then proceed through a select tender process to appoint a successful contractor to commence work at the end of the 2026 winter season.
The project has the following high level program:
· Project Planning Scope Confirmation – May 2025 (Completed)
· Planning Approval Consent – August 2026
· Complete 80% design for tender – August 2026
· Contract award and execution – September 2026
· Construction commences on-site – October 2026
· Construction complete – February 2028
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The Quantity Surveyor has confirmed the Project Budget breakdown and the estimated costs for the recommended design concepts are approximately $50M which is subject to further value engineering and a future procurement process to ensure that Council receives the best value for money from the project.
There is $40M funding allocated in the draft Long Term Financial Plan for the 2025/2026 financial year and Council will seek further State and Commonwealth grant funding opportunities and could potentially stage some of the works
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Internal Ombudsman Shared Service review of Customer Service Improvements
Prepared By: Elizabeth Renneberg - Internal Ombudsman
Authorised By: Peter Gainsford - General Manager
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The IOSS has reviewed Council’s implementation of the Customer Experience Strategy 2024-2027 to date.
Council has implemented an impressive array of improvements to date.
This review has identified early indications of a positive effect on complaints made to the IOSS, with a reduction in the year on year increase in complaints and a decrease in the volume of tier one complaints received. The IOSS has identified a number of strategies that may further assist and has recommended some strategies be reviewed for effectiveness.
BACKGROUND
On 8 August 2023, Council adopted a series of customer experience strategies to enhance Council’s customer service interactions and outreach services to the community.
On 21 November 2023, Council adopted the Customer Experience Strategy 2024-2027.
On 8 August 2023 Council resolved that the Internal Ombudsman Shared Service (IOSS) conduct a 12-month review of customer service to determine what improvements have been made and where there are further opportunities.
This review has been conducted after an appropriate period to seek to evaluate the success of the strategies implemented to date.
DISCUSSION
Inner West Council has been on a customer service transformation journey to seek to improve and strengthen customer service across the organisation since April 2022, with an array of improvements and strategies.
Complaint data
The Internal Ombudsman Shared Service (IOSS) receives escalated complaints regarding Council services and complaints regarding the conduct of Councillors and Council staff, from stakeholders across the member Councils of Inner West, Cumberland City and City of Parramatta.
The IOSS operates under a Governance Charter, and accordingly, will only consider a matter after Council has had the opportunity to formally respond to the complaint.
In terms of complaints received by the IOSS from the community relating to Council services (excluding internal complaints and complaints from the community alleging Councillor or staff misconduct) from 1 July 2020 to 31 March 2025, across the three IOSS member Councils, the highest volume received was regarding Inner West Council:
|
Council |
Complaints received from the community: 1 July 2020 – 31/03/2025* |
|
Inner West |
337 |
|
Cumberland City |
320 |
|
City of Parramatta |
290 |
|
Total |
947 |
*excludes internal complaints and complaints from the community regarding
Councillor and staff conduct
Please note this is only a portion of the total caseload managed by the IOSS.
The volume of complaints received from the community relating to Inner West Council from 1 July 2020 to 31 March 2025 has increased year on year:
- 2020/21 to 2021/22 - 11% increase (Cumberland 6%, Parramatta 17%)
- 2021/22 to 2022/23 - 29% increase (Cumberland -16%, Parramatta 83%)
- 2022/23 to 2023/24 - 7% increase (Cumberland 40%, Parramatta 34%)
- 2023/24 to 2024/25 - expected 12% increase (pro-rata) (Cumberland -15%, Parramatta 16%)
This year on year increase in the receipt of complaints can be attributable to a number of factors, outside a simple increase in complaints. Contributing to this increase is the increased awareness and utilisation of the service by the community and the increased awareness of the service by staff.
Of note, the NSW and Commonwealth Ombudsman services have not seen a similar year on year growth, with more fluctuating numbers, which may be attributed to the impacts of COVID and its effect on government services.
However, of note, in relation to complaints regarding Inner West Council the rate of the increase in complaints has seen a reduction since the start of the 2022/23 financial year.
Indicators of community satisfaction
Reason for complaint
Of the complaints received by the IOSS from the community relating to Council services from 1 July 2020 to 31 March 2025, 38% related to the customer’s dissatisfaction with the overall customer experience when dealing with Council.
Of these:
- 50% related to a lack of action to address an issue;
- 30% related to a lack of timeliness and responsiveness to respond to an issue;
- 16% related to the quality of response received; and,
- 4% related to customers either expressing dissatisfaction with Council’s service or requesting appeal avenues.
Generally, these concerns were raised in conjunction with a substantive issue regarding a Council service.
By comparison, since 1 December 2023, the month following Council’s adoption of the Customer Experience Strategy, until 31 March 2025, 40% of complaints received related to the customer’s dissatisfaction with the overall customer experience when dealing with Council. This figure has remained relatively steady, however it is acknowledged that the majority of customer experience strategies had a lead time to implementation and therefore there may not have been the opportunity for an impact from this date. It is also acknowledged that the response to Council’s implementation to FOGO has also had an impact on complaints received by the IOSS.
Tier one
In order to assess the effectiveness of Council’s strategy, a review of tier one complaints has been conducted. A tier one complaint is where a complainant contacted the IOSS prior to Council finalising their complaint. In accordance with the IOSS Governance Charter, these complaints are classified as ‘tier one’ as they are yet to be resolved by Council and are referred back to Council for initial resolution. The complainant is advised that in the event they are dissatisfied with Council’s resolution of the matter, they are open to contact the IOSS at the conclusion of the matter with Council.
Analysis has been undertaken on tier one complaints to identify the reasons why complainants contact the IOSS prior to resolution.
The IOSS assesses complainants lodged tier one complaints with the IOSS as:
- The IOSS was approached prior to the complainant approaching Council – this may be as a result of a lack of faith in Council’s complaints management process;
- Complainants are dissatisfied with the timeframe to resolve their issue;
- There has been a significant delay in resolution;
- There has been perceived inaction by Council in resolving their complaint.
The below is a snapshot of tier one complaints as a percentage of the total complaints received from the community (minus complaints about staff and Councillor misconduct) per financial year.
|
Value |
2020/21 |
2021/22 |
2022/23 |
2023/24 |
2024/25 |
|
% of complaints as Tier 1 |
53% |
50% |
52% |
62% |
30%* |
*pro-rata estimate
The 2024/25 financial year is on track to receive the lowest volume of tier one complaints, which may indicate a higher level of trust in Council with complainants approaching Council first rather than the IOSS. This also indicates reduced levels of complaints about lengthy resolution times or perceived inaction.
This is a very positive sign for Council – indicating improved response times to service requests and complaints; improvements in the ‘aged’ caseload and increased engagement with Council.
Effectiveness of implemented Customer Experience strategies to date
Council has implemented a significant volume of strategies since the adoption of the Customer Experience Strategy in November 2024, encompassing improved data capture and reporting, improved communication with both customers and with staff, increased engagement and awareness, improved complaints handling processes, both new and enhanced staff training, and enhanced technological improvements.
The IOSS assesses the most impactful strategies to date are:
- Implementation of structural foundation documents: These documents have set the structure and established expected behaviours for staff.
- Training: There has been significant additional training delivered to staff to increase capacity and staff buy-in.
- Improved metrics and reporting: This has allowed a more strategic focus on complaints management and has significantly decreased the volume of ‘aged complaints’ (complaints on hand for more than 30 days). These measures will continue to improve the timeliness of responses.
- Quality Correspondence dashboard: The quality dashboard, operating initially as a quality assurance checklist, has identified areas of improvement in responses to customers. This has included grammar and spelling, but also most importantly, whether the question has been answered or the relevant aspect considered. A known concern to the IOSS is complaints involving multiple questions being part-answered. In conjunction with improving the quality of the response, this dashboard also ensures the substantive issues are addressed.
The Customer Experience team have engaged with the IOSS team throughout the implementation of these strategies.
Opportunities
Channeling contact received
There has been a significant focus and improvement on capturing and reporting on metrics to better track and manage caseloads. The IOSS assesses Council is in a position to report on caseloads with a high degree of accuracy.
On occasion, the IOSS receives complaints from the community regarding the timeliness of responses when a complainant has contacted a member of staff directly, rather than channeled through customer service. In these circumstances, the complaint is not tracked and the quality/timeliness is not measured.
The IOSS recommends that Council undertake a project to encourage all staff to forward all contacts to customer service to ensure they are appropriately registered, recorded and tracked. As part of this process, it is recommended that Council communication channels be reviewed, to ensure compliance with the recently adopted Complaints Operational Management Standard. This will assist in better identifying the actual volume of enquiries received, the caseloads being managed by teams and provide historical data of concerns.
Quality correspondence dashboard
The IOSS acknowledges that there is work underway to integrate the quality correspondence check system into day to day operations. The IOSS recommends this work is expedited to deliver better quality responses to customers.
Delegate responsibilities
At the commencement of the implementation of the Customer Experience Strategy, to ensure appropriate attention, action and responsiveness to community issues, all community interactions were responded to by the relevant Senior Manager. This response included contact details, including email and phone numbers. As expected, this resulted in a significant increase in community contacts to senior staff within the organisation, often on routine and everyday enquiries. This practice continues. The first strategic goal of Council’s Customer Experience Strategy is “Supporting our staff to excel”. This goal includes, “Delegate to our staff”. In order to ensure that all Council staff are invested in delivering quality customer service and there is effective ownership and responsibility, now that extensive training has been undertaken to equip staff with the necessary skills, it is recommended that this strategy is implemented to delegate day to day enquiries to appropriate levels. This will assist in driving further customer service improvements and allow for strategic oversight.
Customer service stalls
Council has implemented Customer service stalls, operating around 30 hours across five days a week from Tuesday-Saturday. Council operates these stalls from transport sites, commercial venues and Council libraries, aquatic centres and parks. These stalls provide customers the opportunity to engage with Council officers on an array of issues.
Based on the volume of customers visiting Council’s mobile customer service stalls to date this financial year, it is anticipated that Council will record just under 10,000 visitors to these stalls. While this volume is significant, it is noted for the 800+ visitors per month, this resulted in an average of 24 service requests being raised per month, or just over one service request per day.
This is an excellent customer service initiative to increase the visibility of Council and its services. However, to ensure appropriate return on investment on costs associated with this service, it is recommended that an assessment is conducted to identify appropriate measures of success and desired outcomes are considered.
Social media engagement
There are two strategies relating to engagement on social media – establish a social media presence to respond to resident requests; and join local resident groups on social media and actively participate in discussions. In order to meet Council’s goal, of “Council anywhere, anytime”, these social media sites are monitored during workdays and on weekends. This engagement assists in raising awareness of Council services and processes.
This is in addition to Council’s extensive social media presence and engagement via the dedicated Communications team.
While there is the potential for the customer service officers to raise service requests as a result of interactions identified, for privacy reasons, complaints cannot be responded to via this medium and only general information provided.
Based on the volume of service requests raised as a result of this social media engagement to date across this financial year, it is anticipated just over 90 service requests will be raised over 12 months. This equates to raising one service request every four days.
Given potential duplication of Council services, there may be scope to review the ongoing effectiveness of this customer service engagement, particularly as to whether it is more appropriate to seek to streamline Council’s engagement points. If this service is to continue, it is recommended that Council identify appropriate measures of success and desired outcomes of this engagement.
Offboarding
It is acknowledged that the Service Transformation Team is undertaking work to refine offboarding processes. It is anticipated that this work will ensure all on hand complaints are reallocated on staff separation and email addresses are deactivated to prevent further customer contact, which would be unanswered. The IOSS will liaise with the relevant team over this process.
Monitoring of emerging issues
The IOSS proactively raises concerns identified from other Councils with Governance and Audit teams as part of our shared service prevention measures to ensure similar issues are not encountered with Inner West. Given the role of customer service and the service improvement team in identifying and seeking to address/improve known and emerging issues, the IOSS undertakes, where relevant, to also involve the customer service and service improvement teams in this proactive advice.
The IOSS has recently re-initiated the Shared Service Forum for Customer Service / Customer Experience and Transformation teams, bring together practitioners across the three Councils to share ideas, challenges, success stories and solutions. The first Forum for 2025, held on 10 April 2025, was well received across the three Councils, with a valuable exchange of ideas and information. A further meeting is scheduled for September 2025. The Customer Service Shared Service Forum was initially formed in 2023.
The IOSS also notes the Customer Experience Team is working to create a Customer Experience Community of Practice within Council.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Customer Experience Strategy 2024-2027 Update
Prepared By: Michael Spikmans - Manager Customer Experience and Innovation
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and notes the report. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report provides an overview of the progress made in improving the customer experience, in line with Council’s commitment to delivering a high-quality customer experience.
Across the 4 Strategic Priorities of the Customer Experience Strategy 2024-2027, the highlights were:
· Strategic Priority 1 – Supporting our staff to excel
o Complaints Handling Policy.
o Complaints Operational Management Standard.
o Case Management Process.
o Improved Customer Service Standards sustained.
o Customer Experience Training and Development Program.
· Strategic Priority 2 – Council anywhere, anytime
o Mobile Customer Service.
o Social Media Customer Service presence.
o Improved parking permit application process.
o Website redesign.
o Snap, Send, Solve integration.
· Strategic Priority 3 – Embedding access and inclusion
o Correspondence quality improvements.
o Website Accessibility Audit.
· Strategic Priority 4 – Monitor, improve, measure, repeat
o Customer Experience Local Democracy Group.
o Customer Experience Metrics.
Council is committed to providing a high-quality customer experience. The initiatives outlined in this report will improve the community’s experience with Council and deliver service excellence.
BACKGROUND
Inner West Council developed a Customer Experience Strategy (Strategy) to cultivate a culture of service excellence, improve customer satisfaction and enhance the community’s experience when interacting with Council. The Strategy encapsulates Council’s vision for a great customer experience, establishes key objectives and initiatives and presents a comprehensive three-year plan for implementation and continuous improvement.
The draft Strategy was tabled at Council with an Engagement Outcomes report. Council adopted the Strategy in November 2023.
DISCUSSION
This section highlights the achievements in improving the customer experience against the four strategic priorities outlined in the Strategy.
Strategic Priority 1 – Supporting our staff to excel
Council will empower staff to deliver exceptional service through improved processes and a culture of responsiveness. Accountability to our community for the standard of service provided remains a priority.
Complaints Handling Policy
Council reviewed and improved the Complaints Handling Policy in September 2023, aligning it with the Customer Experience Strategy and enhancing service excellence. The revised Policy, written in plain English and featuring more diagrams, was adopted by Council in February 2024.
Complaints Operational Management Standard (OMS)
An improved customer-focused Complaints Management OMS empowers staff with tools to manage complaints effectively per Council’s Complaints Handling Policy. It establishes a standard for consistent complaint management.
The Complaints OMS outlines what constitutes a complaint and the steps for reviewing, investigating, and resolving issues. It details responsibilities for engaging with customers, addressing concerns, and maintaining record-keeping.
Endorsed by Council’s Senior Leadership team, the Complaints OMS was introduced in March 2025. A mandatory eLearning module will be available to staff starting in April 2025, providing essential knowledge to manage complaints effectively. In-person training will further raise awareness of diversity and inclusion in customer interactions.
Case Management Process
The Complaints Management OMS incorporates a case management process to address multifaceted complaints and complex service requests, resolving issues before they escalate.
Case management mirrors standard request handling but assigns a single point of contact for consistent customer communication, creating a flexible, customer-focused experience with tailored information and guidance.
Support levels and time invested vary based on issue complexity and customer circumstances. Well-informed customers are more likely to accept fair and respectful outcomes.
Mandatory training on ‘Complaints OMS’ and programs such as ‘Plain English’ will enhance staff awareness in addressing concerns and stress clear communication, fostering stronger customer relationships and improving service delivery.
Improved Customer Service Standards sustained
The improvement in customer service performance has been sustained, consistently surpassing the 90% benchmark in the bi-annual Mystery Shopper program, with a record-high score of 96.28% in May 2024.
Recognising the importance of a timely response, Council has service-level agreements (SLAs) in place to ensure efficient service delivery. See Table 1 for the key measures and corresponding results of financial years 23/24 and 24/25 (up to May 2025).
Table 1. Customer Service performance measures
|
Key Measures |
Target |
FY23/24 |
FY24/25 |
% Difference |
|
Customer Satisfaction (Post-call survey – score out of five) |
4.3 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
+2.4% |
|
‘Mystery Shopper’ Customer Score |
85% |
94.8% |
94.2% |
-0.6% |
|
Customer calls answered within 60 seconds |
80% |
75% |
86% |
+11% |
|
Percentage of back-office processing time within five business days (i.e., emails, applications, payments and forms) |
95% |
100% |
100% |
0% |
|
Percentage of service provided to customers at the Front Counters within 3 minutes of taking a service ticket. |
80% |
89% |
93% |
+4% |
|
Customer requests and applications. |
55% |
52.9% |
53.1% |
+0.2% |
Customer Experience Training and Development Program
Council is designing a training and development program to promote the understanding and application of the Customer Experience Strategy. It will be recommended that all staff undertake this program annually.
The program's content will be designed to incorporate first contact resolution and service standards. It will ensure that staff possess the necessary skills and knowledge, are service-oriented, and have a deep understanding of community needs and expectations.
A needs assessment was conducted with senior leadership to identify areas of focus. Based on the results, the following online courses will be implemented by June 2025:
· Plain English and correspondence writing (Launched February 2025)
· Customer Experience and Service Charter (Launched May 2025)
· Customer Request Management (Launched May 2025)
· Customer Service soft skills (Launching June 2025).
Starting in the next financial year, the Customer Experience team will reinforce these online trainings with scheduled and ad-hoc face-to-face sessions.
Strategic Priority 2 – Council anywhere, anytime
Residents can access Council services anytime, anywhere, through the continuously improved online and mobile channels. Council will ensure a personalised and consistent experience across all contact touchpoints.
Mobile Customer Service
The Mobile Customer Service team has been fully operational since 10 October 2023. Stalls operate from Tuesday to Friday for seven hours daily and on Saturdays for four hours, rotating weekly across five wards.
Since its establishment, the mobile customer service team has helped 14,399 residents. They provide information on Council services, update the community on essential initiatives like the Food Organics Garden Organics (FOGO) rollout, respond to various inquiries, and submit resident service requests. In FY24/25 (up to 31 May 2025), the mobile customer service team have assisted 7,862 residents.
Table 2 illustrates Mobile Customer Service's total visitations across different community locations. Aquatic Centres and Libraries stand out as the most efficient locations, thanks to their accessibility, significant foot traffic, and weather shielding, guaranteeing continuous service even in poor weather.
Table 2. Mobile Customer
Service total visits by location (October 2023 - May 2025)
|
Location |
Number of Visits |
Number of Customers Served |
|
Aquatic Centres |
81 |
5,204 |
|
Libraries |
71 |
2,349 |
|
Parks |
65 |
1,882 |
|
Council events |
12 |
1,540 |
|
Plazas |
26 |
1,196 |
|
Shopping Centres |
19 |
890 |
|
Transport for NSW |
35 |
768 |
|
Town Halls |
13 |
570 |
|
Totals: |
322 |
14,399 |
Social Media Customer Service presence
Council has established a dedicated Customer Service Facebook page, allowing the community to submit service requests directly via messaging. Additionally, the Mobile Customer Service team monitors 24 community Facebook pages seven days a week (morning and evening, excluding public holidays) to track direct tags, mentions, and ambient conversations related to Council. By engaging with these groups, Council provides responsive and efficient service, addressing community concerns promptly and adding value through proactive customer service.
Community feedback on Council’s presence in these Facebook groups and the Customer Service Facebook page has been overwhelmingly positive. This active social media presence offers residents a convenient way to interact with the customer service team.
Improved parking permit application process
The North Area Parking Permit Renewal commenced in October 2024 to ensure that 100% of North Area parking permits are renewed to an anniversary expiry date by 30 June 2025. This transition moves away from the previous blanket expiry date of 30 April every two years, providing a more streamlined approach to permit renewals.
The renewal rollout has been phased evenly across the North Area, allowing Customer Service to assess and determine applications without impacting service level agreements (SLA) while effectively utilising existing resources.
Since the rollout of the renewal, Customer Service has processed 9,782 of approximately 13,000 permits that were due. Notably, an average of 62% of applications have been received through Council’s online services portal, reducing wait times at Service Centres.
Website redesign
The website redesign project has made significant progress since the completion of Stage 1 in February 2025. This stage involved a vendor developing high-fidelity website designs that ensured alignment with brand guidelines and accessibility standards. A community focus group reviewed the designs, receiving positive feedback for their clean, simple, and intuitive structure, which enhances the user experience and reflects the identity of Inner West Council.
Stage 2 is underway, with the release of a Request for Quotation (RFQ) in May 2025. The RFQ seeks a partner to implement the new website design using a Drupal-based Content Management System (CMS), which will support enhanced accessibility, mobile responsiveness, and future scalability in line with WCAG 2.1 AA standards. The selected vendor is expected to begin the implementation in June 2025, with a planned go-live date in February 2026.
Additionally, Council is conducting engagement sessions with service units to review, audit, and consolidate website content. This ensures that all information remains accurate, clear, and aligned with the community's needs. The redesign will streamline navigation and enhance the overall user experience across the site.
Snap Send Solve integration
Council has commenced a project to integrate Snap Send Solve with the
Customer Request Management System (CRM). This project aims to simplify and
modernise how the community reports issues and requests services, responding
directly to consistent feedback regarding the difficulties of using the current
request forms on the website.
The integration will streamline the process for submitting common requests via the Snap Send Solve platform, providing the community with a user-friendly, mobile-first experience. It will also help reduce manual processing, improve data accuracy, and enhance customer experience.
As part of the project, Council will investigate the deployment of QR codes on essential public facilities, such as park bins and public restrooms. These QR codes will enable residents to easily report issues or request services through Snap Send Solve, enhancing convenience and promoting active community participation in maintaining public spaces.
Strategic Priority 3 – Embedding access and inclusion
Council is committed to clear, accessible communication and inclusive service delivery. Information and channels will be simplified to remove barriers for all residents.
Correspondence quality improvements
Council is enhancing the quality of its communication with the community to ensure it is transparent, accessible and inclusive. A targeted training program was developed to equip high-volume teams with the skills needed to produce clear, accessible and customer-focused correspondence. The training covers:
· Essential plain English skills.
· Correspondence writing better practices.
· Customer-centric communication.
Over 300 staff members have completed face-to-face training, and an additional 80 have completed the online course launched in February 2025.
Beyond the training program, a comprehensive resource suite comprising accessible and plain English writing is now available to all Council staff. This suite includes materials from:
· Microsoft
· Leading Plain English and Accessible Writing Organisations.
· State and Federal Government Guidelines.
In April 2025, Council launched an improved reporting dashboard that enables service units to track their monthly correspondence against Council standards. Additional work is underway to implement live error checking and pre-written resolution responses, ensuring the delivery of high-quality correspondence to the community.
Website Accessibility Audit
In 2024, Council engaged the Centre for Accessibility Australia to conduct a comprehensive website assessment, evaluating it against all 55 Success Criteria outlined in the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 Level AA standard. The outcome included a detailed report for each success criterion, an overall scorecard, an analysis of how various disability groups were impacted, and raw data to help developers identify issues.
The findings have informed the website redesign project, prioritising improved user accessibility. Additionally, several enhancements to the site's accessibility have been made:
· 247 external button links were updated to ensure accessibility compliance for screen reader users.
· All image and content carousels were refreshed to enhance accessibility for keyboard navigators.
· 131 accordions were modified to improve accessibility for users relying on assistive technology.
Strategic Priority 4 – Monitor, improve, measure, repeat
Council embraces a continuous improvement cycle for customer experience and will work with staff to set goals and measure progress. Regular community feedback through various forums will guide further improvement.
Customer Experience Local Democracy Group
Customer Service Review Sub-Committee meetings were held from 2022 to 2024 to validate planned customer experience strategies and improvements. The Customer Service Review Subcommittee endorsed the continuation of a customer service reference group as a Local Democracy Group (LDG).
The customer experience LDG was established in late 2024. A welcoming reception took place in March 2025, and the inaugural meeting was held in April. During the current Council term, the LDG will provide input into the review and implementation of the Service Charter, Customer Experience Strategy, and Complaints Handling Policy.
Customer Experience Metrics
Council recognises the need for an efficient method to gather and analyse customer satisfaction (CSAT) metrics. This initiative aims to enhance the customer experience by providing immediate feedback after interactions with Council services.
This report analyses the 3,278 responses received between 1 November 2024 and 31 March 2025. During this period, 25,544 post-request surveys were sent out, with a completion rate of 13%.
The Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) score is determined by assigning a score ranging from 0 to 5 to each response on the scale. These individual scores are then averaged to calculate the overall score as a percentage. For instance, if five respondents choose 'Strongly Agree' (5) and five choose 'Strongly Disagree' (0), the overall CSAT score would be 50%.
 |
Figure 1. CSAT scale provided by AskYourTeam
Respondents were asked to rate their level of agreement with four statements regarding their completed service request with Council.
Table 3. CSAT score by question and category for FY24/25
|
Question |
Category |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
|
I was treated with respect. |
People |
83% |
86% (+3%) |
85% (-1%) |
|
The information provided to me was accurate and relevant. |
Communication and Process |
73% |
77% (+4%) |
75% (-2%) |
|
I am satisfied with the outcome of my request. |
Resolution and Outcome |
68% |
72% (+4%) |
69% (-3%) |
|
My request was resolved quickly. |
Resolution Speed |
64% |
70% (+6%) |
68% (-2%) |
Figure 2. Average CSAT by request channel
Figure 3. Average CSAT by Service Unit (Top 8)
Figure 4. Feedback with positive sentiment by topic (Top
5)
Key
Findings:
· Council has positively improved customer satisfaction across all four question categories. This measure will continue to be tracked to assess the impact of improvement initiatives.
· Respondent data consistently supports overall channel trends, showing that 53% use Council’s online portal to submit requests, while 23% reach out via phone. This underlines the importance of digital enhancements as a significant focus for Council, given the large number of users engaging with this channel and the impact of satisfaction scores on Council’s overall performance.
· Council’s staff significantly contribute to positive satisfaction ratings. The community commends the professionalism of Council employees and frequently expresses a sense of respect. Council’s in-person service centres consistently yield the highest satisfaction scores among all service channels.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Christmas Decorations
Prepared By: Daniel East - Senior Manager Strategic Planning
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
3: Creative communities and a strong economy |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Christmas trees used last year have been assessed by a structural engineer who advised they passed lifespan and are not safe to use. There is $90,000 available for Christmas installation for 2025. It is proposed to use around $66,000 to purchase new decorations with the remaining funding to be used to install the Wellington Ring and Christmas star that remain in the Council collection.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 18 February 2025, Council resolved the following:
· That Council bring back a report on the opportunity to expand the existing festive decorations across the Inner West Local Government Area, in a timeframe that provides for decorations to be sourced and delivered
· That the report include a Christmas Decoration Action Plan that invests in new decorations for Inner West shopping districts for 2025 and beyond
· That consideration is given to creating a festive streetscape (such as decorations on light posts, fairy lights, Christmas tree).
In 2024 Council had nine large Christmas decorations at key business centres that were selected based on proximity to retailers, prominence, and visibility. The locations included:
1. Annandale - Christmas Tree
2. Haberfield - Christmas Tree
3. Rozelle - Christmas Tree
4. Leichhardt - Christmas Tree
5. Marrickville - Christmas Tree
6. Dulwich Hill - Christmas Tree
7. Summer Hill - Christmas Tree
8. Balmain - Christmas Star
9. Ashfield Civic Centre - Wellington Ring
Council also installed:
· 30 Christmas Wreaths in prominent locations across the LGA
· 9 Christmas Cubes
· 18 reusable Christmas bin wraps
· Christmas banners and flags.
DISCUSSION
Council’s Christmas trees that were used last year have been assessed by a structural engineer who advised they are passed their maximum lifespan and cannot be used again. This means Council only owns two key decorations the Wellington Ring and Christmas Star.
The current budget will not enable Council to acquire new large Christmas decorations for key business centres as Christmas trees and standalone commercial decorations can range between $30,000 - $85,000 an item, plus installation costs are around $150,000 per year for nine decorations to be craned in place.
The budget for Christmas decorations for 2025-26 FY is $90,000, these funds will be used to:
· Install and dismantle of the Wellington Ring and Christmas star that Council owns at a cost of around $24,000
· Purchase new decorations for the LGA with the remain balance of $66,000.
While there are a number of Christmas ‘elements” currently there are two large decorations in the Christmas collection - the Wellington Ring and Christmas Star.
Christmas Decoration Action Plan for 2025
Going forward options are being reviewed that offer both financial and environmental sustainability while also celebrating the spirit of Christmas and supporting the local economy.
The table at Attachment 1 – Christmas Options and Costs, illustrates indicative costs for some popular decorations options.
Christmas Elements 2025
The following smaller Christmas elements for part of the Christmas collection and will be installed in the lead up to the Festive Season:
· 30 Christmas Wreaths in prominent locations across the LGA
· 12 Christmas Cubes
· 18 reusable Christmas bin wraps
· Christmas banners on Norton Street Leichhardt, Crystal Street Petersham, Wardell Road Dulwich Hill and flags on Marrickville road.
In addition, this year all Customer Service Centres will display a new Christmas message that will also be placed on Council’s digital screens at:
· Alex Trevallion Plaza outdoor screen
· Leichhardt Aquatic Centre (LPAC)
· Haberfield Library
· All Library branches
· Hannaford Centre at Rozelle
Local expertise from the Small Business Local Democracy Group is being utilised to restock our Christmas decorations and create a festive streetscape through
· assessment and selection of suppliers,
· confirming best locations for decorations to create a festive feel within the budget.
FINANCIAL
IMPLICATIONS
The actions
outlined in this report are within the current budget allocation for Christmas
Decorations.
|
1.⇩ |
Christmas Tree Options and Costs |
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Tourism Action Plan Expenditure - Bi-Monthly Report
Prepared By: Daniel East - Senior Manager Strategic Planning
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
3: Creative communities and a strong economy |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
An advertising strategy which is an action in the Tourism Plan has been developed to build awareness of what tourism experiences are available in the inner west to better position the LGA as a visitor destination. The strategy uses a range of media including print, digital/social media and advertising on public transport. The strategy will target domestic and international markets and out of area visitors and be implemented in the new financial year with a total spend of $85,000.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 29 April 2025, Council resolved the following in part:
2. That Council reallocate the $85,000 for website development towards a sponsored content and advertising strategy, including print, digital, and social media outlets and other advertising opportunities such as public transport, with an advertising plan to be included in the next bi-monthly report.
3. That Council undertake a review of the plan after six months.
DISCUSSION
Update on Brewers and Distillers Action Plan
The implementation of the actions from the Brewers and Distillers Action Plan are complete. Below is an update of current activities with Brewers and Distillers arising out of ongoing collaboration with these two groups.
Brewers
The Inner West Brewers Association received a grant $200,000 from Transport NSW to implement a range of promotional activations including improvements to wayfinding. Council staff across a range of teams have been assisting in the development, design and implementation of the wayfinding component. The Association sought to highlight the Ale Trail through new blade signs to sit underneath road names signs, enhance the visitor experience and provide better assistance for those using the Ale Trail. Project completion is expected late August.
Distillers
Balmain Chamber of Commerce is working in partnership with Council to bring together all nine local distilleries in the LGA toward a voluntary collaboration. This collaboration is to develop a distillery trail leveraging off the success of the Ale Trail as a model. The Inner West Distillery Trail will drive visitation and spend to the sector and is expected to have a flow on effect to other business in the area. The Distillery Trail is a co-action from both the Tourism Action Plan and the Brewer and Distillers Action Plan and is funded from the Economic Development budget. The primary deliverable is an online map showing the location and information about each distiller. Following the launch of the map later in the year the opportunity for other collateral will be explored with the group.
Sponsored Content and Advertising Strategy
An Advertising Strategy has been developed for implementation in the new financial year which forms one of the actions in the Tourism Action Plan. The strategy was developed in consultation with Comms and Economic Team. Staff have also reached out to some of the chambers and the Small Business Local Democracy Group about ideas for the most suitable medians to use. The focus is to create a “destination story” inviting audiences to rediscover, visit and explore all that the Inner West offers. New content will be developed and used on a range of medians. The Plan will showcase the whole LGA as a destination and will target tourism attraction events, sectors and precincts including:
· Showcase the whole LGA through a generic campaign
· Showcase Council’s flagship festivals
· Heritage Pubs & Distillery Trails
· Live Music and Eat Streets
· Art and Creative Trails
The Advertising Strategy is outlined below.
Aim
· Build awareness of what the area has to offer and drive tourism expenditure
· Better position the Inner West as a visitor destination
· Help the LGA stand out in a crowded marketplace
Target Audience
Visitors both domestic and international and out of area visitors.
Communication Channels
Council’s social media platforms through:
1. Short videos of key tourism destination experiences
2. Sponsored advertising including:
· Radio
· Billboards
· Public transport
· Digital/social media
· Sydney Weekender
Details of sponsored advertising medians are outlined below:
Tourism printed publications
Tourism publications like Sydney Official Map and Sydney Travel Guide will help Council directly target international visitors with publications found in major hotel chains and Sydney airport. The link below from Sydney Travel Guide Autumn 2025, has an editorial the Chamber did for Balmain Rozelle on pages 32-33, provides a good example of what can be done.
https://issuu.com/bigsplashmedia/docs/sydney_travel_guide_autumn_2025
Radio
Radio like SBS is an excellent median to showcase Council’s flagship Portuguese event Bairro to greater Sydney.
Digital media outlets
Time Out Sydney and Concrete Playground are digital media outlets that have a wide reach and will help build awareness of destination experiences like our flagship events, eat streets, live music scheme and art and creative trails.
Public transport
Back of metro bus advertising is the most reasonably priced and effective public transport option available to reach target markets. A single bus service has many different routes. This means reach continues to grow over a longer period as new audiences are met. Data shows that 78% of people have acted after seeing a bus add. The cost for a four-week period on a bus route in CBD & surrounds which targets tourism markets is $10,500.
Billboards
Billboards are a good promotional tool to showcase the LGA, with some located near Sydney airport for tourist to view. Further to this there is an agreement in place that gives Council a 15% allocation of usage of the Tempe digital billboard.
Sydney Weekender
Staff also recommend value in undertaking a campaign in Sydney Weekender to showcase the LGA. As over a million people turn to Sydney Weekender with 69% of viewers looking for eating out options and 73% for domestic travel. Many other councils have used Sydney Weekender including Burwood, Liverpool, Parramatta, Campbelltown, Northern Beaches and Newcastle and reported positive results. Burwood Council’s Executive Manager Place Management and Communications said: “The episode captured the essence of Burwood and delivered a compelling narrative with the feedback received to date being overwhelmingly positive”
Council would be able to direct the messaging to be highlighted in a segment. An Eating Out segment costs $8,800 and includes producing new content for the show and includes catchup on 7Plus, segment on Sydney Weekender website, Facebook and Instagram story. An Activity Story costs $15,000 and broadcast across 3 x episodes. National encores and re-runs on 7TWO and 7FLIX and is available anytime on 7plus and their social media platforms
Staff will evaluate each promotional campaign with outcomes to be included in the six-monthly review of the advertising strategy.
The table at Attachment 1 outlines a 12-month expenditure of advertising strategy for key sectors, events, experiences and what median will be used and an estimate of costs.
Below is the updated table of how the $200,000 Tourism Budget has been allocated, including the Advertising Strategy that is the subject of this report.
|
Expenditure of $200,000 Inner West Tourism Fund 25/26 |
||
|
No |
Action update |
Budget Allocation |
|
1. |
Investigation is underway to formulate and design the Tourism Wayfinding Signs for three major transport hubs · Sydenham/Marrickville · Balmain/Rozelle · Newtown/Enmore |
$85,000 |
|
2. |
Advertising Strategy at Attachment 1 of this report to promote tourism experiences that targets both domestic and international tourism markets. |
$85,000 |
|
3. |
Two options are being explored – working with a tour operator for creative tours to connect visitors with local artists and studios.
The other option is to develop a walking tour of Perfect Match. The budget identified for this element is seed funding to establish the opportunity within the inner west for a small business tour operator initiative. It relies on the identification of a partner to deliver a combination of one or both options. |
$20,000 |
|
4. |
By Council resolution a portion of the $200,000 from the Inner West Tourism Strategy was to support businesses surrounding Sydenham Station
This budget allocation has been used to support early engagement of ReVITALise Sydenham - a strategy for improvements along Sydenham Rd funded by a TfNSW Grant of $1M.
Community engagement has been completed and a project plan developed to deliver a safer, well lit, active and more vibrant precinct that runs along Sydenham Rd, between Victoria Rd and Sydenham Station.
This project is significant I its own right and Councillors will be kept up to date in more detail by specific ongoing briefing notes and reports.
|
$10,000 |
|
Total |
|
$200,000 |
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The $200,000 Tourism Actin Plan has been accommodated in the 2025/25 budget. All proposed actions accounted for in this Plan are within budget.
|
1.⇩ |
Expenditure Advertising Strategy Table |
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Fire & Rescue NSW Inspection Report - 260A Liverpool Road Ashfield
Prepared By: Michael Ryan - Senior Manager, Health & Building
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Correspondence was received from Fire & Rescue NSW (Attachment 1) on 29 April 2025 which identified fire safety matters in relation to 260A Liverpool Road Ashfield. Following an inspection of the premises by Council’s Acting Senior Fire Safety Officer and Senior Fire Safety Officer, it was determined that a Notice of Intention to serve a Development Control Order was warranted. Satisfaction of this Notice will require either the installation or modification to the existing fire safety measures in the building to ensure adequate provision for fire safety and awareness. These works are able to be undertaken in accordance with State Planning provisions through the issuing of a Development Control Order under the EPAA.
BACKGROUND
Fire and Rescue NSW (FRNSW) advised Inner West Council on 29 April 2025 of an inspection they undertook in response to a complaint regarding concerns with the adequacy of the provision for the fire safety at the premises, including:
- Concerns that the diesel sprinkler pump had the “Pump Running” and “Overspeed Shutdown” warning lights operating. Operational capability of this pump at the time of the inspection was unknown.A compliant block plan was not installed at the brigade booster assembly.
- The isolating valve within the booster cabinet was not secured or locked in the open position.
- Compliant signage had not been provided to the sprinkler booster assembly identifying the connections and the maximum allowable inlet pressure.
- Concerns with regards to the storage and functionality of several Fire Hose Reels and their cabinets.
- Portable Fire Extinguisher cabinets contained cleaning signage which may impede the access and functionality of the Portable Extinguishers.
- Multiple faults were showing on the Fire Indicator Panel within Kmart.
- The emergency and exit signage within Fire stair 15, the loading dock are on Level 3 were not compliant.
- The final exit door from Fire Stair 15 had a broken self-closing mechanism and did not return to the fully closed position after opening.
Unprotected service penetrations were identified above the sliding fire door near the Norton Street carpark entrance.
DISCUSSION
In accordance with the provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPAA), FRNSW referred the matter to Council for follow up. In response, Council’s Fire Safety Team conducted an inspection of the premises at 260A Liverpool Rd. Ashfield (Ashfield Mall Shopping Centre)as per below:
Inspection Result
Inspections of the premises were conducted on 1 May 2025 and 13 May 2025 which revealed:
- The diesel sprinkler pump had the “Pump Running” and “Overspeed Shutdown” warning lights operating. Operational capability of this pump at the time of the inspection was unknown
- A water, fade and weather resistant block plan was not installed at the brigade booster assembly contrary to the intent of Clause 11.5 of AS 2419.1-2021.- Signage had not been provided to the sprinkler booster assembly identifying the connections and the maximum allowable inlet pressure.
- A permanently affixed fade and weather-resistant sign indicating test pressure and boost pressure was not installed at the brigade booster assembly contrary to the intent of Clause 11.3.4 of AS 2419.1-2021
- The isolating valve within the booster cabinet was not secured or locked in the open position contrary to the requirements of Clause 8.7 of AS 2419.1-2021.
- The Fire Hose Reel near the dry cleaner on the Level 2 – Basement 1 carpark level (near Norton Street entrance) was not capable of immediate use as the nozzle was not stowed in the interlock device contrary to the requirements of Clause 2.2.7.2 of AS 1221- 1997
- Several Fire Hose Reel / Portable Fire Extinguisher cabinets contained cleaning signage contrary to the requirements of Clause 10.4.4 of AS2441-2005.
- The Fire Hose Reel cabinet near the Liverpool Street entrance on Level 3 contained electrical cables hanging from the ceiling.
- Faults showing on the Fire Indicator Panel within Kmart.
- The emergency exit signage at the end of the exit corridor on Level 3 exiting to the loading dock area was missing the pictogram contrary to the requirements of AS 2293.1-2018
- The exit sign into Fire Stair 15 at the door from the mall on Level 3 at the lift shafts near Kmart was not illuminated contrary to the requirements of AS 2293.1-2018 and Section 81 of EPAR21.
- The exit sign at the final exit door from Fire Stair 15 was missing contrary to the requirements of Clause E4D5 of the National Construction Code Volume 1 2022 (NCC).
- The final exit door from Fire Stair 15 had a broken self-closing mechanism and did not return to the fully closed position after opening contrary to the requirements of Clause 2.1.3 of AS1905.1-2015
- The artificial lighting within Fire Stair 15 was not operational contrary to the requirements of Clause F6D5 of the NCC.
- Identified unprotected service penetrations above the sliding fire door near the Norton Street carpark entrance, contrary to the requirements of C4D15 of the NCC.
Direction: (EPA/2025/0070) A Fire Safety Notice of Intention to serve a Development Control Order was issued on 29 May 2025, requiring certain works to be undertaken in keeping with the comments from FRNSW in their letter dated 24 April 2025 as well as the findings from Council’s inspections of the premises on 1 May 2025 and 13 May 2025.
The owners of the premises are aware of the concerns with regards to the essential fire safety measures within the building and are actively working towards rectifying all identified issues.
An interim Annual Fire Safety Statement has been obtained and submitted to Council which demonstrates that the majority of essential fire safety measures within the building are operating to the required standards of performance.
After all fire safety solutions are implemented, a Fire Safety Certificate is to be submitted to Council, which will conclude the matter.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
|
1.⇩ |
Fire & Rescue NSW INspection Report - 260A Liverpool Road Ashfield |
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Working with Homes NSW and social housing providers to improve waste management across the Inner West
Prepared By: Erin White - Manager Resource Recovery and Fleet Services
Authorised By: Manod Wickramasinghe - Acting Director Engineering
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
1: An ecologically sustainable Inner West 4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities 5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Council previously resolved to receive a report on waste management in collaboration with Homes NSW and other social housing providers in the Inner West. This report updates on collaborations with Homes NSW, St George Housing and Bridge Housing to improve waste management in social housing properties across the Inner West.
Progress has been made on improving waste management practices at social housing locations in Cahill Place, Marrickville, Elliott Street Balmain and Addison Road, Marrickville with further work proposed for Livingston Road, Petersham and Lilyfield Road, Lilyfield.
This includes actions such as improved waste infrastructure, signage, monitoring and education.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 11 March 2025, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council reaffirm its commitment to ongoing engagement with Homes NSW and community housing providers to improve waste management for residents of public and community housing in the Inner West.
2. That Council receive a report at the June 2025 Council meeting regarding ongoing engagement with Homes NSW and community housing providers on waste management, detailing issues that have been raised to date and Council’s approach to resolving them.
3. That Council receive further reports on this engagement twice a year.
At the Council meeting held on 29 April 2025, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council notes the ongoing issue of rubbish dumping and associated vermin and public health risks occurring outside Homes NSW properties in the inner west.
2. That Council notes that the Deputy Mayor, Mat Howard, has put several motions to Council on this topic, and that Council has previously resolved to:
a) Form a working group comprising Council staff, representatives from Homes NSW and community housing providers to improve and streamline waste collection in large social and community housing communities in the Inner West (December 2024); and
b) Receive a report in June 2025 on ongoing engagement with Homes NSW to improve waste management, and thereafter twice yearly (March 2025).
3. That Council acknowledges that Inner West Council staff have taken steps, including waste removal when notified, increased monitoring of dumping hotspots, and increased bin provision and bin collection to support residents of the properties.
4. That Council recognises that Homes NSW has agreed to some measures, including installing CCTV and lighting at the property in Whites Creek Lane, Annandale, conducted a letterbox drop, and referring tenant needs to Homes NSW’s Inner West tenancy management unit, but notes that implementation timelines remain unclear and community concern is growing.
5. That Council requests the Mayor write to the NSW Minister for Housing, and the 12 Council Meeting 29 April 2025 CEO of Homes NSW, urging that Homes NSW urgently engage in the already resolved formal consultation with the Inner West Council on a coordinated and long-term strategy to address:
a) Waste and maintenance management at Homes NSW estates;
b) Social service outreach and support for tenants; and
c) Communication and accountability processes.
6. That Council supports local community initiatives to improve neighbourhood conditions around affected properties, such as the proposed revival of the Whites Creek Lane Neighbourhood Association, and commits to assisting with:
a) Grant applications;
b) Access to council programs such as the Perfect Match mural scheme; and
c) Access to Council venues for meetings.
7. That Council reaffirms that a progress report be brought to Council at the June 2025 meeting outlining:
a) Correspondence with the Minister and Homes NSW;
b) Any commitments or timelines secured; and
c) Outcomes of resident engagement and Council’s waste management response.
DISCUSSION
Waste and resource recovery can be complex in social housing estates and buildings. Council staff have been developing more collaborative relationships with teams across social housing providers to work through areas experiencing challenges.
Locations have been prioritised based on areas of greatest concern to enable a combined effort from operational staff and educational staff in Council’s Resource Recovery team and the properties and tenancy teams at housing providers. This collaboration and relationship building is an investment in improved resource recovery outcomes and these steps will ensure the task is undertaken properly.
Some examples of collaborations are detailed below:
Homes NSW
Inner West Resource Recovery staff have had monthly meetings from March 2025 with Homes NSW that has included staff from tenancies, strategy and properties teams as well as cleaning contractors.
Homes NSW are installing surveillance cameras at three Inner West sites to help monitor dumping following success in neighbouring council areas.
The working group determined that combined efforts between Homes NSW teams and Inner West Council need to be undertaken concurrently and strategically to resolve ongoing waste issues.
Council works with the housing provider to address any infrastructure needs prior to tenant engagement and education as demonstrated in the sites below:
Cahill Place, Marrickville
A bin audit has been undertaken by Council and broken bins are in the process of being repaired/replaced. Bin areas have been jet washed by Homes NSW and once bin areas are fixed bin bay signage will be provided.
In addition, surveillance cameras are currently being installed by Homes NSW to improve monitoring.
A tenant barbeque is being hosted by Homes NSW in Cahill Place, Marrickville in July and Inner West staff will attend to educate and engage tenants about garbage, recycling and clean up services.
The same process is proposed to be undertaken at the following locations:
· 55 Livingstone Road, Petersham
· 99 Lilyfield Road, Lilyfield
Elliott Street, Balmain (Balmain Estate)
The Balmain Estate on Elliott Street, Balmain is jointly managed by Homes NSW and Bridge Housing. Council has arranged a meeting with both parties on 10 June 2025 with the agenda to include:
- Streamlining waste collection
- Potential measures that could be taken to stop illegal dumping
- Communication and potential outreach to residents.
The objective is to work collaboratively to resolve issues with waste collection, illegal dumping, and resident engagement at the Balmain Estate. A bin audit has already been completed with repairs occurring of broken bins, or bins without lids. Abandoned bins that are not owned by anyone have been removed to improve access and amenity.
Council Officers are inspecting the Balmain Estate after the collection on a weekly basis and removing any dumped rubbish in public areas, as well as ensuring the bin collection has taken place to a high standard and damaged bins are repaired or replaced. The focus is on spilt waste, checking bins are being returned correctly after collection and emptied completely.
St George Housing
35-41 Addison Road, Marrickville
A new development at 35-41 Addison Road, Marrickville comprising of 49 social housing and twelve affordable housing units managed by St George Housing became occupied in Early 2025. Prior to tenants moving in, the Resource Recovery Planning Manager and Apartments officer attended the site on 16 December 2024 to discuss resource recovery including bin numbers, placement, storage, and access in addition to reuse of materials and presentation of clean-up.
Resident information was provided as part of the moving-in process and Council has a strong on-going relationship with the St George Housing contact to address any issues as they arise.
NSW Homes Circular Economy 2030 Forum
On 8 April 2025, Inner West participated in and presented on FOGO and waste at the Homes NSW online forum with staff representing various state departments. Homes NSW is the largest landlord in the state and is required to implement FOGO to all housing properties by 2030 under the NSW EPA FOGO mandate. Inner West is working with and supporting Homes NSW to implement this as a partnership. Stakeholders at the forum included Department of Communities and Justice, Homes NSW, NSW Gov, Community Housing, Argyle Housing, Mission Australia, NSW EPA. This forum was hosted by Nexus.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
Engagements and infrastructure provided by Council are managed through the operational budget from the Domestic Waste Management Charges
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Pocket City Farms
Prepared By: Rocco Sergi - Acting Strategic Investments & Property Manager
Authorised By: Scott Mullen - Acting Director Property and Major Projects
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2013 the former Marrickville Council, following a procurement process, awarded Camperdown Projects Pty Ltd (Camperdown Projects), a wholly owned subsidiary of Canterbury Hurlstone Park RSL, a Lease for 4 x 5 years terms, commencing 21 June 2016.
Pocket City Farms is a not-for-profit urban farming organisation that is operating under a Licence granted by Camperdown Projects Pty Ltd, within Camperdown Commons (Camperdown Projects).
The Licence was granted by Camperdown Projects to Pocket City Farms to fulfil a Lease requirement for a market garden/urban farm and expires on 20 June 2026 and has no holdover provisions, meaning Pocket City Farms will be required to vacate the site at the expiry date unless a further agreement can be reached with the leaseholder.
Camperdown Projects is currently seeking to sell its leasehold interest. While the Lease requires the presence of a market garden, it does not specify the operator or size. Council’s legal review confirms this obligation will transfer to any new lessee.
The Property team continues to meet with Camperdown Projects regarding the future use of the site, including the proposed sale of the leasehold interest., as well as opportunities to increase community activation of the site, including live music activations, markets, and other community events, and advertise the community space on Council websites, social media, and the newsletter.
A report on the outcome of the Expression of Interest process and any request for consent to assignment of the lease will be brought to the first available Council meeting after such a request is made.
BACKGROUND
Figure 1 – Location of Camperdown Commons, Camperdown
In 2013 the former Marrickville Council ran an Expressions of Interest (EOI) process, then following a shortlisting process, a Request for Tender (RFT) for a capital upgrade and Lease of the former Camperdown Bowling Club premises.
At the completion of the procurement process, Camperdown Projects Pty Ltd (Camperdown Projects), a wholly owned subsidiary of Canterbury Hurlstone Park RSL, were granted a Lease for 4 x 5 years terms, commencing 21 June 2016.
Clause 5 of Annexure E of the Lease (Attachment 1) provides the following requirement for a market garden/ urban farm; however, it does not nominate who should manage it.
Camperdown Projects researched potential operators and selected Pocket City Farms to operate approximately 1200 square metres of the site to meet is requirements under the Lease.
Pocket City Farms were granted a five-year Licence Agreement, with an option of a further five year term from 2021 and pay no rent. The current licence expires on 20 June 2026 when they will be required to vacate the site
The farm will continue to operate until expiry, and offer fresh produce to the community, sustainability education, and community engagement programs, including workshops, volunteering, and school visits.
Figure2 – Image of market garden/ farm at Camperdown Commons
At the Council meeting held on 29 April 2025 meeting, Council resolved the following in part:
4. That Council receive an urgent report about the status of Pocket City Farms.
5. That Council receive a report on the outcome of the Expression of Interest process and any request for consent to assign of the lease at the first available Council meeting after such a request is made to Council.
6. That any request for assignment of the lease at Camperdown Commons be brought to Council for decision.
7. That Council commence discussions with the incoming tenant and report back to Council on opportunities to increase community activation of the site, including live music activations, markets, and other community events, and advertise the community space on Council websites, social media, and the newsletter.
DISCUSSION
Camperdown Projects is currently undertaking an Expressions of Interest market process to sell its Leasehold prior to the expiry of this current term. If they are successful in selling their interest it will be up to the new Lessee to decide if they will operate the market garden themselves or seek an operator to meet that obligation of the Lease.
Council’s Legal team have reviewed the Lease and confirmed that this obligation is required for the new Lessee.
Council officers will prepare a report on the outcome of the Expression of Interest process and any request for consent to assign of the lease at the first available Council meeting after such a request is made to Council. This report will include a summary of the proposal, an assessment of its alignment with the existing Lease terms and Council’s strategic objectives, and any legal, financial, or operational implications.
If the leasehold is assigned, the Property team will engage proactively with the incoming tenant to ensure a clear understanding of, and adherence to, all Lease obligations. Emphasis will be placed on the continued operation and maintenance of the market garden, which is a key condition of the Lease. Council staff will provide guidance and oversight as needed to support the tenant in meeting these requirements and to uphold the intended community and environmental outcomes of the site.
The Property team continues to meet with Camperdown Projects, and future tenants, regarding opportunities to increase community activation of the site, including live music activations, markets, and other community events. The community space has now been included on Council website, and will be marketed via social media, and the newsletter, and included as part of Venues marketing strategy that is currently being rolled out.
Legal Implications
Council’s Legal Services have reviewed the Lease and have advised that the incoming tenant will need to operate a market garden to meet its obligations under Clause 5 of Annexure E of the Lease.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
|
1.⇩ |
Agreed Manner of Operation |
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Utilisation of Council Venues
Prepared By: Rocco Sergi - Acting Strategic Investments & Property Manager
Authorised By: Scott Mullen - Acting Director Property and Major Projects
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Council has resolved to increase community awareness and interest in using community venues and increase participation in the various events and activities that happen within these spaces, via an expansion of the marketing strategy to include a greater diversify of communication and advertising channels.
With the success of the Creative Town Halls initiative, Community Venues is leveraging the increased contacts generated with the creative community to broaden the reach of future marketing and advertising opportunities.
Neighbouring councils were contacted and information gathered regarding systems of venue management, staffing and booking systems, with a view to understand where councils operate similarly and to identify opportunities for improvement.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 18 February 2025 meeting, it was reported that for the period January to June 2024 there were 9,018 Regular Bookings (from our regular repeat hirers) and 365 Casual Bookings (from one-off casual hirers), totalling 9,383 individual bookings. From this total, there were 1,142 creative bookings. The total number of bookings increased by 18% in the second half of 2024.
For the same period the total revenue for all venues was approximately $308K ($253K for first 6 months) with $1.3M of subsidies granted to various Not for Profit, community and creative groups.
Of the subsidy amount noted above, approximately $232K was for applicants to the Creative Town Halls initiative (inclusive of those receiving 50% and 100% Subsidy). For a full breakdown of utilisation, revenue, and fee subsidy by venue.
At the Council meeting held on 18 February 2025 meeting, Council resolved the following in part:
2. That, as part of the marketing strategy, Council provide information and promotional material to the Inner West Creative Network for the Creative Town Halls program for distribution amongst their membership.
3. That Council receive a report by the April 2025 meeting investigating opportunities to maximise community use and engagement of community venues and their efficient management, including examining how different councils manage similar venues, staff resourcing and expertise, and potential partnerships with external organisations and other levels of government.
4. That Council adds to its website and social media channels, information about events at the Town Halls.
DISCUSSION
Inner West Creative Network
The resolution called for provision of information and promotional material to the Inner West Creative Network for the Creative Town Halls initiative.
Community Venues, with the assistance of council's graphic designers is updating the existing electronic promotional material for the Creative Town Halls initiative for distribution to the Inner West Creative Network and their 500 members. This promotional material will also be re-advertised on the Creative Communities June e-newsletter its distribution to its 4000 subscribers.
Maximising Community use and improving efficiency
Community Venues contacted seven metropolitan councils, including Newcastle council, and were asked a series of survey questions, with the majority providing feedback/responses with the exception of Bayside and Newcastle, who at the writing of this report had not yet responded.
Community Venues spoke with staff involved in managing and bookings for the respective Councils and Information was gathered regarding systems of venue management, staffing and booking system (Attachment 1). The information collected was used to understand where councils operate similarly and to identify opportunities for improvement.
The findings from the survey showed that the majority did not offer staff support to hirers at hirable venues, except where co-located at Libraries, staffed Community Centres or Recreation facilities, with staff levels averaging between 2 to 4 booking officers.
Over half of surveyed councils used the 'Bookable' booking platform, and Community Venues will investigate it and other such platforms, and work with ICT to ascertain if further efficiencies may be gained by the adoption of this platform, once the contract with Optimo.
All surveyed councils promoted their venues via internal council platforms such as the council website and social media, while Canada Bay council also used movie ads and bus stop ads.
The fees charged by the Councils for the venues were similar to those charged by Inner West Council, and the subsidy’s provided were also similar; however Inner West Council, with the launch of the Creative Use of Town Halls program, is the only Council to offer a full 100% waiver for creative individuals and organisations that meet the criteria, with $1.3M of subsidies granted to various Not for Profit, community and creative groups.
The survey also identified that there were opportunities for maximising community use and engagement included upgrading sites with multiple venues into staffed Community Hubs or engaging existing lease or licence holders in specific sites as 'Anchor Tenants'. This could also be extended to certain regular hirers of certain venues via partnership agreements or MOUs, whereby they undertake to use their networks within their respective community to generate attention and interest in said venue.
Petersham Creative Hub at Petersham Town Hall now has four tenants that are all promoting the use of our town halls for creative use including Queer Screen, Box of Birds, Future Proof Music, and Inner West Music Festival. The Property team are working with all of the tenants to identify pathways for increasing awareness of the Creative Use of Town Halls. Fringe, located at Marrickville Town Hall are also assisting with the promotion of the program.
Advertising Events at Town Halls
As part of the Annual Expression of Interest for Indoor Venues, that was held in September and October 2024 to allow existing community groups and other hirers to renew their use in 2025, hirers are being asked provide consent to have their event or program and contact details published on Council's website.
Those regular events that are open to the public, and where consent has been granted by the hirer, are being added to council's What's on page on the website. Of those that are larger productions, council will include these into the regular social media program to generate the maximum attention.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The actions outlined in the Marketing Strategy are being funded by operational budgets.
|
1.⇩ |
Council Comparison - Community Venues |
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Robert Street, Balmain - Opportunities for separated pedestrian/cycle lane
Prepared By: Sunny Jo - Coordinator Traffic Engineering Services North
Authorised By: Manod Wickramasinghe - Acting Director Engineering
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A preliminary feasibility work has been undertaken to improve pedestrian and bicycle connection in Robert Street between Buchanan Street and Mullen Street. A separated two-way bicycle and pedestrian footpath design along the south side of Robert Street is proposed to be completed by early 2027 and utilising the Inner West Local Infrastructure Contribution Plan 2023, the project could be suitably constructed in the 2027/28 financial year.
It is noted that this project is subject to works that may impact on the timing of construction, such as nearby developments and works related to the Bays Metro Station.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 20 May 2025, Council considered a report regarding opportunities for a separated pedestrian/cycleway on Robert Street, Rozelle and resolved the following:
1. That Council receive and note the report.
2. That Council thank Council officers for their work in preparing and presenting this report.
3. That Council requests that officers provide a confirmed timeline for the design of a separated pedestrian and cycle path between Mullins Street and Buchanan Street in the 2025/2026 financial year, including clarification of the expected commencement date within that year, and present a report at the June Council meeting.
4. That Council requests a further update once the timing has been confirmed with Place Management NSW and Transport for NSW regarding community consultation on the proposed $17 million connectivity and accessibility upgrades to active transport links surrounding the White Bay Power Station.
DISCUSSION
The opportunity for a separated pedestrian and bicycle path would be subject to the design of the traffic signals being prepared at the intersection of Robert Street and Mullens Street.
The current design of the intersection and White Bay Power Station forecourt works assume that the existing bicycle path will continue along the south side of Robert Street. As such a suitable crossing facility will need to be designed and constructed to enable crossing from the south side to the north side of Robert Street, ideally east of Buchanan Street.
With Robert Street being identified as a prioritised access route from the adopted Inner West Cycling Strategy 2023, a separated two-way bicycle path in Robert Street would be appropriate and is consistent with the Transport for NSW’s Cycleway Design Toolbox guidelines. The main features of a separated pedestrian and bicycle path would typically feature:
· 2.4m width for two-way bicycle travel;
· 0.4m separation kerb to the parking lane; and
· A separated footpath for pedestrians to minimise bicycle and pedestrian conflicts.
As noted in the earlier report, the separated path will require the conversion of angled parking spaces to parallel spaces, which will reduce on-street parking supply in the area and the number of spaces impacted can be determined during the concept design stage of the project.
The timeline for the design of a separated pedestrian and cycle path between Mullens Street and Buchanan Street is 12 months with commencement expected by October 2025.
The high level program would be scheduled as tabled blow:
|
Project stage |
Planned schedule |
|
Design procurement |
October 2025 |
|
Survey |
November 2025 |
|
Concept design |
April 2026 |
|
Community engagement |
May-June 2026 |
|
Final concept design |
August 2026 |
|
Traffic Committee and Council approvals |
October 2026 |
|
Preparation of construction plans |
January 2027 |
As noted in the table, the construction of the separated pedestrian and bicycle path is planned for the 2027-28 year, and is subject to external works in the surrounding area that may impact on the timing and suitability of the project. This could include infrastructure projects such as intersection works at the Robert Street and unnamed road connecting to the Ports Access Road and White Bay Metro Station, and possible redevelopments of nearby industrial and/or commercial properties.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The provision of any improved pedestrian/cycling facilities on Robert Street not being delivered by Placemaking NSW would require funding for planning, design and delivery.
The Inner West Local Infrastructure Contribution Plan 2023 includes transport works items on Robert Street which will be utilised to commence design works for improved active transport facilities along Robert Street commencing from the 2025/26 financial year.
It is estimated that the design of a separated pedestrian/cycleway on Robert Street from Mullens Street to Buchanan Street would require $230,000. Detailed construction costs will be developed through the design phase. At this time a high level estimate of the construction cost is expected to range from $2m to $2.5m, subject to the final design.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Gambling Harm Minimisation
Prepared By: Simon Watts - Social and Cultural Planning Manager
Authorised By: Ruth Callaghan - Director Community
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Council is committed to reducing gambling harm in the Inner West. This report quantifies likely gambling harm in the Inner West based on research by Equity Economics with support from the Alliance for Gambling Reform and Wesley Mission, the Grattan Institute and the NSW Office of Responsible Gambling. The report also reflects on the changing community attitudes to gambling, including attitudes to electronic gaming machines.
Gambling losses in Australia are the highest in the world, and the highest on record. $31.5 billion was lost on gambling by Australians in 2022/23. The average loss for each adult who gambles is $2,492 per annum.
In the Inner West, as many as 7,640 people are experiencing moderate to high-risk gambling with the greatest impact on men aged 18-24 years (up to 645 young men). 14,898 people who gamble in the Inner West have experienced at least one gambling harm in the past year. 24,257 people in the Inner West experienced harm from someone else’s gambling in the past year. Overall, 21% of people experience harm from gambling, including from gambling that ceased more than 12 months ago.
Finally, the report considers the data on poker machine revenue and viability at two Inner West small, registered clubs.
BACKGROUND
At the Council Meeting held on 3 December 2024, Council resolved the following:
1. That Council receive and note the report.
2. That Council receives a further report in 6 months updating Council on progress on the actions listed in the report as being underway.
3. That Council recommits to holding a Gambling Harm Minimisation Roundtable in August 2025.
4. That Council shares gambling harm minimisation campaign materials from the Office of Responsible Gambling and GambleAware, including information about free counselling services, in English and other languages in libraries and on the Inner West Council website to help increase awareness of gambling harms and to broaden the reach of these important campaigns.
5. That Council investigate and receive a report back on the feasibility of phasing out gambling advertising on council-owned property prior to the next Gambling Harm Minimisation Roundtable, exempting advertising pertaining to local clubs.
6. That Council writes to the Minister for Communications seeking a government response to all of the recommendations of the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs report of its inquiry into online gambling and its impacts on those experiencing gambling harm, You Win Some, You Lose More.
7. That Council includes resources and information on reducing gambling harm in the Inner West Council Seniors Directory.
8. That Council work with organisations in the sector such as Wesley Mission to develop means of quantifying the harm in the Inner West caused by gambling, and community sentiment for removing poker machines.
Items 4, 6 and 7 above have been actioned. Item 3 will be actioned in August 2025. The contractual complexity involved with Item 5 requires significant additional work and an additional report will be prepared for Council.
This report addresses item 8 of this resolution.
Gambling losses in Australia are the highest in the world, and the highest on record. $32 billion was lost on gambling by Australians in 2022/23.
The average loss for each adult who gambles is $2,492 per annum. This is a 25% increase on pre Covid pandemic levels.
In NSW, between 2019 and 2024, poker machine gambling has dropped from 16% to 14% of all gambling[i]. However, poker machines remain responsible for half of all gambling harm[ii]. In 2023/24 the net profit from poker machines in the Inner West was $61 million for clubs and $101 million for hotels.
How this briefing was prepared
Important new research was used for developing this snapshot of gambling harm in the Inner West:
· 2025 research prepared by Equity Economics for Wesley Mission and the Alliance of Gambling Reform[iii]
· 2024 research by the Grattan Institute[iv]
· 2024 Survey of NSW Gambling prepared for the NSW Responsible Gambling Fund, reporting the experience and views of a random sample of 10,000 NSW residents[v].
In addition, data was provided by the Office of Responsible Gambling and the local education and support service, Gamble Aware, which the Office funds.
This national and state level research and local data was applied to the Inner West population of 191,000 people to provide a population based quantification of overall gambling harm.
Finally, Council’s own financial and property data was utilised to provide the snapshot of the operation of the two registered clubs with poker machines for which Council is the Manager on behalf of Crown Lands.
DISCUSSION
Gambling harm in the Inner West
In the Inner West, as many as 7,640 people are estimated to be experiencing moderate to high-risk gambling with the greatest impact on men aged 18-24 years (up to 645 young men)[vi]. Men are over twice as likely to experience moderate-to high-risk gambling compared to women. Others more likely to experience moderate to high-risk gambling include Aboriginal people, single people and those living alone.
15% of gamblers and 8% of all NSW residents (an estimated 14,898 people who gamble in the Inner West[vii]) have experienced at least one gambling harm in the past year. Compared to those experiencing no harm, they spend twice as much on gambling, are four times more likely to experience moderate to high-risk gambling and have significantly lower life satisfaction[viii]. The most frequent harms include reduced savings, less available spending money, decreased spending on recreation, and feelings of regret, shame and distress.
Who is harmed most?
A dramatically disproportionate amount of harm falls on higher spending and more frequent gamblers. Those who gamble once a week make up only 10% of gamblers, but they experience 30% of gambling harm[ix]. People spending over $300 per annum on gambling make up 40% of gamblers, but they experience 70% of the harm. Harms are identifiable in six areas of emotional, financial, health, relationships, social and work/study impacts.
Among those who gamble, the distribution of gambling harm is disproportionate. Younger men under 40 years of age bear about half the total harm impact from their own gambling. Others experiencing a disproportionate burden of harm include Aboriginal people, those speaking a language other than English, single people, those without tertiary education, and those living alone.
13% of NSW residents (24,257 people in the Inner West) experienced harm from someone else’s gambling in the past year and this harm was 1.5 times greater than the impact to gamblers. Identified harms included getting less enjoyment from spending time with people they care about, feeling angry about not controlling the gambling of the person they care about, feelings of hopelessness, and late payment of bills. For affected others, harm was evenly distributed across age and gender, although women generally experienced more harm than men. This can include domestic and sexual violence.
Seeking help for gambling harm in the Inner West
Research in NSW shows that seeking help for gambling harm is lowest among those most at risk of gambling harm[x]. In the Inner West in 2024[xi]:
· Gamble Aware services provided 18 information sessions including workshops, presentations, stalls, and forums
· 64 people attended 863 financial or gambling counselling sessions, including family members of those experiencing moderate to high-risk gambling
· Of those seeking counselling support, 27 were female, 36 were male, and 1 did not disclose their gender
· 23 of the 67 seeking counselling support were Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people
· 14 of the 67 people seeking counselling support were aged between 18 and 24 years of age.
Who gambles?
Advertising is highly effective in driving people to online gambling sites and normalises all forms of gambling. Exposure to gambling advertising for children is the second most significant predictor of future gambling harm. In 2024 54% of adults reporting gambling activity in the past 12 months, compared to 53% in 2019. Further:
· Between 2019 and 2024, poker machine gambling has dropped from 16% to 14% of all gambling
· online gambling has emerged as a key challenge, 27% of adults report online gambling in the past year
· online sports betting has increased by 50% since 2019 (from 4% to 7%), with a similar change in online race betting (from 5% to 7%)
· demographic patterns in gambling participation persist, with men (59%) more likely to gamble than women (49%). This difference is most pronounced in younger age groups[xii].
Where are the poker machines?
There are five large, registered clubs and 14 much smaller ones in the Inner West. The large, registered clubs have significant numbers of poker machines. Among the 14 smaller clubs, nine have poker machines. In 2024, one smaller club removed their poker machines, and two more are considering this option. Only one local club has plans to increase its poker machine numbers. Council is working with these 14 smaller clubs through its Love Your Club initiative.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
Nil.
[1] Sathanapally, A., Griffiths, K., and Baldwin, E. (2024). A better bet: How Australia should prevent gambling harm. Grattan Institute.
[1] Equity Economics and Development (2025) Gambling in Australia’s Cost-Of-Living Crisis:
The Unspoken Black Hole in Household Budgets, supported by the Alliance for Gambling Reform and Wesley Mission.
[1] Sathanapally, A., Griffiths, K., and Baldwin, E. (2024). A better bet: How Australia should prevent gambling harm. Grattan Institute.
[1] Browne M, Russell AMT, Dellosa G, Rockloff M and Hing N (2024) NSW Gambling Survey 2024, Central Queensland University. Commissioned by the NSW Responsible Gambling Fund.
[1] Estimate based on sample in Browne M, Russell AMT, Dellosa G, Rockloff M and Hing N (2024) NSW Gambling Survey 2024, Central Queensland University. Commissioned by the NSW Responsible Gambling Fund.
[1] Estimate based on sample in Browne M, Russell AMT, Dellosa G, Rockloff M and Hing N (2024) NSW Gambling Survey 2024, Central Queensland University. Commissioned by the NSW Responsible Gambling Fund.
[1] Self reported data from a sample of 10,000 people in NSW: in Browne M, Russell AMT, Dellosa G, Rockloff M and Hing N (2024) NSW Gambling Survey 2024, Central Queensland University. Commissioned by the NSW Responsible Gambling Fund.
[1] Self reported data from a sample of 10,000 people in NSW: in Browne M, Russell AMT, Dellosa G, Rockloff M and Hing N (2024) NSW Gambling Survey 2024, Central Queensland University. Commissioned by the NSW Responsible Gambling Fund.
[1] Browne M, Russell AMT, Dellosa G, Rockloff M and Hing N (2024) NSW Gambling Survey 2024, Central Queensland University. Commissioned by the NSW Responsible Gambling Fund.
[1] Data from the Inner West Gamble Aware Service and the Office of Responsible Gambling
[1] Browne M, Russell AMT, Dellosa G, Rockloff M and Hing N (2024) NSW Gambling Survey 2024, Central Queensland University. Commissioned by the NSW Responsible Gambling Fund.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Priority Access to Council Early Learning Centres for Children of Women in Refuges
Prepared By: Maria Pappas - Senior Manager Children's Services
Authorised By: Ruth Callaghan - Director Community
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
|
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on the 18 February 2025, Council resolved the following:
1. Options for providing priority access pathways to Council-operated early learning centres for children of women residing in domestic violence refuges within the Inner West.
2. Potential for establishing formal partnerships with local domestic violence services to facilitate streamlined access to early learning places.
3. Mechanisms to waive or reduce upfront fees and bonds that may create barriers to access
4. Staff training needs to ensure trauma-informed practice in supporting children and families fleeing domestic violence
5. Any resource or policy implications of implementing such initiatives.
Council already has pathways and gives priority of access to children and families experiencing domestic and family violence – including those who live in refuges. Appropriate mechanisms are in place to support these community members and there are no financial or policy adjustments required.
Through their work and regular formal and informal interactions with children and families, Inner West Council’s early childhood professionals encounter situations where children and families are vulnerable or at risk. Staff are trained in trauma informed practice and have regular professional development from experts in relation to working with vulnerable families and children, including those who may be experiencing complex trauma and living in kinship or extended family arrangements. This can include those living in or fleeing situations of domestic and family violence. In these cases, staff navigate the change in family dynamics and living arrangements and prioritise the safety and wellbeing of the child. With family consent, staff may also access or facilitate external expertise for specific children, as each situation is different.
All Council's early learning centres apply the Commonwealth Government’s Priority of Access Guidelines and related requirements under the Family Assistance Act, which sets the rules for Child Care Subsidy and additional financial assistance for vulnerable families. These are:
Priority 1: Children at risk of serious abuse or neglect, including domestic and family violence.
Priority 2: Children of a single parent who satisfies, or of both parents who satisfy, the work/training/study test under Family Assistance Legislation.
Priority 3: Any other child.
Council’s centres, including outside school hours care, preschool and long day care, currently receive referrals through formal and informal pathways including local women's refuges and other community organisations, interagency contacts, the Department of Communities and Justice, Police, word of mouth (eg social workers and support workers), relatives and extended family, teachers and health workers. Depending on confidentiality requirements and any relevant court orders, Centre Directors and senior staff customise assistance for vulnerable children and their parents/care givers. This can include waivers on bonds and establishing payment plans and other financial supports.
DISCUSSION
Three of Council's early learning services currently have children enrolled where a woman or family member has been formally referred by a local refuge or caseworker supporting them after leaving a situation of family violence or disclosing that they are living with an abusive partner. In these situations, information about the place of residence and other personal disclosures are kept confidential and often involve Family Court orders or Apprehended Violence Orders. Centre Directors and relevant staff work with caseworkers, Police and other agencies to ensure that orders are adhered to in relation to who can pick up/drop off children and other daily operational arrangements.
Early learning staff also apply trauma informed practice to identify potential concerns where a child or family member may disclose information about concerns for their psychological or physical safety. In these "informal" situations, centre Directors put the safety of children first by making referrals to local support agencies, including refuges. Where necessary, staff may make mandatory reports to child protection agencies such as the Department of Communities and Justice or the Office of the Children's Guardian.
In extenuating circumstances centres can (and do) apply for a waiver to go over their licensed places through the Australian Children’s Education and Care Authority (ACECQA) to accommodate the child in care.
Depending on the situation, Council can also waive both the bond payment and enrolment fee to eliminate the financial barrier upfront. In addition, the parent will be supported to access Child Care Subsidy and Additional Child Care Subsidy (ACCS) in discussion with the caseworker. Under Commonwealth legislation, ACCS is available for up to 13 weeks to provide extra support for childcare fees in situations of temporary hardship. It can be continued as long as certain criteria are met.
Centre Directors collaborate on referrals from local domestic violence refuges in the Inner West such as Sanctuary Housing and others. This is coordinated through the assigned case worker as they work towards finding suitable affordable housing for the mother and her child / children.
Professional development in trauma informed practice ís an ongoing commitment from Council for the early childhood educators in our services. Over the last two years, senior staff have been focusing on supporting and upskilling educators to understand the impact of trauma (e.g. DFV) on young children and how educators can best support the child and their psychological and physical safety within early education services. This includes the impact of adverse childhood experiences that can cause trauma and how trauma impacts children’s development, behaviour, interactions with peers and educators, learning and transition to school.
Several educators have undertaken further professional development on this topic so they can become leaders and provide expertise to others. Topics have included Informed, Sensitive and Responsive Trauma Practices; The Effect of Traumatic experiences on Childhood Attachment Styles; Supporting Children in Distress (aimed at primary school aged children); and Social Justice in Early Childhood.
Council also supports centre Directors and educators to work with adult victims of domestic violence such as Mental Health First Aid and the Accidental Counsellor. Senior staff from Council participate in interagency meetings and share information with all children’s services – this information includes referral pathways, any upcoming networking and professional development opportunities and information about soft-entry points to early education e.g. Magic Yellow Bus, library story-times etc).
Research shows that trauma-informed and specifically designed programs for families affected by domestic violence can offer the care and safety that both the child and family need and build protective factors for future child development and school education.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Initiatives to support families and children experiencing or leaving situations of domestic and family violence are implemented within existing resources, including the Commonwealth Government's Additional Childcare Subsidy.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: 2024-2025 Annual Pecuniary Interest Returns
Prepared By: Patricia Clive - Governance Manager
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to table the Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest Returns (First Returns) by nominated staff members and the updated return of Councillor Victor Macri as required in the Code of Conduct (clause 4.26).
BACKGROUND
The Local Government Act 1993 requires the Code of Conduct to include provisions for disclosure of pecuniary interests. Councillors and Council Officers are required under clause 4.21 of the Code of Conduct to complete a Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest form within 3 months of becoming a Councillor or Designated Person.
Councillors and staff must at any time, submit updated returns if/when they become aware of any changes that may affect their previously submitted returns. The General Manager is required under clause 4.25 of the Code to table returns at the first meeting of the Council after these are lodged.
The information contained in the returns is made publicly available in accordance with the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009, the Government Information (Public Access) Regulation 2009 and any guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner. Certain personal information has been redacted in attached returns in accordance with this requirement.
The attached returns will be made available on Council’s website following this meeting.
DISCUSSION
Following its Operation Hector investigation, the Independent Commission Against Corruption recommended that Council introduces, on a risk basis, screening of employees for directorships of external businesses, including potential association with suppliers or other stakeholders. Additionally, Council’s Internal Ombudsman Shared Service recommended that Council reviews its application of the processes in respect of Designated Persons under the Code of Conduct.
To progress the implementation of these recommendations, Council’s General Manager nominated 80 Council Officer positions as Designated Persons under the Code of Conduct based on their regulatory, contractual and financial responsibilities. This report tables the first pecuniary interest returns for the Council Officers in these positions and also includes an updated return for Councillor Victor Macri.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
Attachment 2 has been published separately in the Attachments Document on Council’s Website https://www.innerwest.nsw.gov.au/about/the-council/council-meetings/current-council-meetings
|
1.⇩ |
Disclosure of pecuniary interests (Updated) - Clr Victor Macri |
|
2.⇨ |
Disclosure of pecuniary interests - 2024-2025 Staff First Returns - Published Separately on Council’s website |
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Community Safety Action Plan
Prepared By: Adele Pittaway - Community Wellbeing Manager
Authorised By: Ruth Callaghan - Director Community
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The community engagement associated with the development of the Community Safety Action Plan (CSAP) has been completed and the engagement report and data are being finalised. Having identified a range of community safety issues through this engagement, internal consultation with relevant Council teams to determine appropriate actions will also be undertaken for the next stage of developing the plan, as there is considerable feedback in relation to the design and infrastructure for public spaces and other cross council matters.
Analysis of the community engagement, desk top research and internal stakeholder consultation is shaping the draft of the Community Safety Action Plan. The plan will include the implementation of separate Council resolutions including the domestic and family violence hub (modelled on current approach in Burwood LGA). The following information outlines briefly the breadth of work undertaken and some of the key themes that will be addressed in developing the plan.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meeting held on 6 December 2022, Council resolved the following:
1. In consultation with the community, local architects and businesses and the police, Council develop an Inner West Community Safety Action plan; and
2. As part of this process, Council work with the community, Bill Crews Foundation, Three Bridges, the Village project, and the police to hold a public meeting in Summer Hill about Community Wellbeing and Safety.
At the Council meeting held on 4 June 2024, Council resolved the following in part:
6. That Council, in the context of community engagement on the Community Safety Action Plan, hold a roundtable with relevant organisations about what more Council can do to support women’s refuges and other services in the Inner West in supporting women and children fleeing domestic violence.
At the Council meeting held on 29 April 2025 Council resolved the following in part:
2. That Council note that staff are currently developing the Community Safety Action Plan and seek an update at the June 2025 Council meeting
DISCUSSION
Community Engagement has involved a public meeting, online community survey via Your Say Inner West and a domestic, family and sexual violence roundtable held on 14 May 2025.
The information/feedback received via three engagement initiatives outlined below will be central to the development of the CSAP.
In addition to the above Council staff have conducted desktop research of Inner West Community Profile, SEIFA index of disadvantage, BOCSAR crime statistics, safety concerns raised through the LGBTQ+ Local Democracy Group and 2024 Inner West Police/Inner West Council LGBTQIA+ Community Safety Forum, and relevant Inner West Council policies, strategies, protocols, programs, and events.
Analysis of the community engagement, desk top research and internal stakeholder consultation is shaping the draft of the Community Safety Action Plan. The plan will include the implementation of separate Council resolutions including the domestic and family violence hub (modelled on current approach in Burwood LGA).
Summer Hill Public Meeting: Let’s Talk About Safety in Summer Hill
On 25 May 2023, Council hosted the Safety in Summer Hill Community Public Meeting at Summer Hill Community Centre. The meeting provided an opportunity for residents, services, and local businesses to discuss the community’s safety experience and offer suggestions and solutions to increasing safety.
The twenty-five attendees included parents, residents, community service providers working within the Summer Hill area and officers from the Burwood Police Area Command. A presentation from the NSW Crime Prevention team and a speech from Reverend Bill Crews about community safety and connection were delivered on the night.
Themes arising from the meeting included the need to:
- Ensure young people are safe from abuse, crime and drug taking. The use of vapes was highlighted as a particular health concern.
- Develop safe places and spaces for people to come together and reduce social isolation. This included having youth centres for young people to attend.
- Have adequate lighting in public spaces to make them feel welcome and safe.
- Raising community awareness of issues such as domestic violence and cyber safety.
Your Say Inner West: Let’s Talk About Safety
From 6 May to 1 July 2024, the community was invited to provide feedback via an online survey on what safety means and how safe they feel in the Inner West. During the engagement period 2,003 people visited the Your Say Inner West project page, and 226 people completed the survey.
The survey was promoted through local interagencies and networks, Customer Service Stalls at Stanmore Library and Balmain Wharf, posters and flyers, and community safety specific pop-up stalls in Ashfield, Newtown, and Balmain which over 90 people engaged with. The social media promotion of the survey reached over 60,000 people.
The Your Say Inner West: Let’s Talk About Safety engagement report is in the final stages of completion and data/analysis community feedback will be used in drafting the Plan. Participants were provided a series of statements and were asked to identify their level of agreement or level of importance with each statement. These were split into five categories including perception of safety, infrastructure, community, access to services and policing and reducing domestic violence.
Data has been collected from across the five council wards, with 92% of the sample stating that they live in the Inner West. Most respondents to the survey (87%) of the responders thought that the Inner West is completely, very or moderately safe. People associated this safety to community connection and cohesion and bright street lighting in public places.
The main reason that participants thought the Inner West was unsafe were limited to poor lighting in public places, antisocial behaviour and issues with public transport hubs. It is of note that lighting is a factor that contributes to feelings of safety and feeling unsafe. The use of a map allowing survey respondents to pinpoint where they felt unsafe has enabled Council to identify specific locations where the public believe increased lighting is required. This specific issue will be included in the final draft Plan to be considered by Council.
The top three safety issues impacting the Inner West were identified as:
- Road safety including traffic, speeding and aggression on the roads (27% of respondents).
- Pedestrian safety including lack of crossings, driver not stopping and bikes on footpaths (22% of respondents).
- Antisocial behaviour (16% of respondents).
Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence (DFSV) Roundtable
On 14 May 2025, Inner West Council hosted a roundtable consultation specifically for domestic, family and sexual violence service providers and support agencies. The roundtable enabled the sector to share insights and expertise. Council staff gave a presentation detailing the engagement to date for the Community Safety Action Plan and themes from both Summer Hill public meeting and Your Say Inner West public consultation data.
Themes arising from the roundtable included:
- Acknowledgement of domestic and family violence as a community issue that must be spoken about and reported to reduce the incidence and prevalence within the community.
- Barriers including fear of tracking and surveillance by the perpetrator need to be addressed in delivering services.
- There is support for Council’s current development around a Love and Hope hub model that allows people to access advice and/or support with service providers all located in one room in a safe community space such as a library.
- Promoting existing Support Hubs/Services to community and other service providers to ensure utilisation.
- Increasing safe places for young people to hang out with friends or peers after school hours or into the late evening. This results in perception of unsafe spaces within the community when young people are gathering in groups in public areas, with the potential of youth crime increasing during late night hours.
- Better use of interagency meetings to share practice and resources between stakeholders. There were some positives suggestions in relation to Council’s role in facilitating these activities.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Jubilee Place
From: Councillors Ismet Tastan and Kerrie Fergusson
|
MOTION
1. That Council notes the removal of parking spaces by the NSW Marine Area Command (MAC) in March 2025, following the installation of Tow Away Zone signs on the northern side of Jubilee Place, without prior community consultation.
2. That Council acknowledges that the removal of these parking spaces has significantly reduced the availability of residential parking in the area.
3. That Council notes that Jubilee Place is Crown Land and governed by the Crown Land Management Act 2016, meaning Inner West Council does not currently have the authority to manage or enforce parking in this area.
4. That Council further notes that a subdivision certificate was lodged with the former Leichhardt Council (now Inner West Council) to subdivide the parcel and dedicate the road area as a public road; however, the process stalled due to unresolved issues relating to land contamination.
5. That Council recognises Council’s ongoing efforts since March 2025 to engage with the NSW Police Force (NSWPF) and thanks Council staff for securing a formal meeting to work towards a mutually acceptable outcome.
6. That Council requests that, in its discussions with the NSWPF, Council explore options to enable the introduction of appropriate parking restrictions to address residential parking pressures, including long-stay vehicles such as trailers, boats, and camper-vans. These options should include, but not be limited to: a) Dedication of Jubilee Place to Council as a public road, in line with the original conditions of consent; and b) Appointment of Council officers as authorised officers under the Crown Land Management Act 2016 by the Minister for Lands and Property, to allow Council to install and enforce parking c) signage.
7. That Council requests that a progress report be provided to Council at the August 2025 meeting, outlining developments and next steps.
|
Background
In March 2025 the NSW Police Marine Area Command (MAC), with headquarters located in Jubilee Place, Balmain, installed ‘TOW AWAY ZONE’ signage on a large section of the Northern side of Jubilee Place, removing parking spaces that were being used by the public, to enable better access to MAC headquarters for large MAC vehicles and emergency vehicles. This was done with no prior notification to Inner West Council or local residents, and no community consultation.
The residents of Jubilee Place and neighbouring streets have continued to face an extreme shortage of parking. Many properties do not have street frontage or off-street parking, and Ewenton Park and Council-run Clontarf Cottage draw visitors to the area, exacerbating the problem.
The MAC has been located in Jubilee Place, Balmain since 2004. The conditions of consent granted by the Department of Planning stipulated that within six months of the commencement of use, Jubilee Place was to be dedicated to Council as a public road. This requires the subdivision of land. Neither the subdivision or dedication was undertaken at the time.
Between 2004 and 2019 the MAC and residents co-existed with little issue. In 2019 the conflict between resident parking and vehicular access to the MAC site first arose, when the MAC notified Inner West Council of a request to remove parking spaces to enable emergency access. At the time, residents, councillors, and the Member for Balmain, Jamie Parker, pushed back, and the MAC and Inner West Council agreed that the parking changes would not progress, and Council and MAC would enter negotiations to dedicate the land to Council as a public road. A motion was moved at the time reaffirming this, with point 2 stating : “That Council negotiate with MAC to dedicate Jubilee Place to Council as a public road, as per the original conditions of consent.” To date, that dedication has not taken place.
Additionally, the original conditions of the consent state that the imposition of the conditions were done in order to “protect and improve the environment and amenity of the locality”, and the clear intention of the conditions was to ensure that Jubilee Place become a public roadway in order to ensure that it remain open for public access and public parking.
The land in question is Crown Land, and currently managed by the MAC, and the Crown Lands Management Act 2016 does not allow for the management of parking in the same way that local councils can undertake parking management. There are increasing issues on Jubilee Place with long-term parked vehicles, including trailers and camper-vans, which is worsening the availability of parking for local residents. Council has demonstrated that it is equipped to address problems arising from long-term parked vehicles by introducing different parking restrictions, which is why it is imperative that this land is finally dedicated to Council so it can be properly managed in the best interests of the local community, while enabling the MAC the access that it needs to safely operate.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
|
1.⇩ |
Mayoral Minute 22 October 2019 |
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Parking availability to local shopping strips
From: Councillor Victor Macri
|
MOTION
1. That Council undertake an Economic Impact study regarding the potential impacts of the loss of parking availability to local shopping strips.
2. That Council facilitate an information evening for the shopping strips of Marrickville and Dulwich Hill.
|
Background
Many of the local business owners are concerned and confused about the impacts of a fairer Innerwest, in relation to the ability for visitors and customers to frequent these local centres if there is parking availability is reduced.
Officer’s Comments:
Comment from Director Planning:
There are extensive opportunities for engagement with various sectors of the residential and business community throughout the Inner West. These sessions have been selected to maximise both availability and proximity – including sessions in Balmain, Leichhardt, Dulwich Hill, Marrickville and Ashfield. In order to be as inclusive as possible the calendar for engagement includes many weekday evening and Saturday sessions as below.
The sessions at either Marrickville or Dulwich Hill will be most convenient for local businesses in that area. These are being held as follows
Numerous sessions are also being held at Ashfield Service Centre and the business community is welcome to attend any of these.
The Engagement Calendar is below – details on how to book a Meet the Planner session or the location of a particular drop – in go to Our Fairer Future Plan | Your Say Inner West
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Pedestrian Safety at Ashfield Park; Traffic Calming Measures at Orpington and Pembroke Street, Ashfield
From: Councillor Izabella Antoniou
|
MOTION
1. That Council notes the existing work currently being carried out by Council staff in the preparation of the Ashfield North and Croydon Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) plan.
2. That Council notes the advocacy of local residents
Akira Cheema and Neel Cheema, and thanks them for their contribution to
community safety. 3. That Council ensures the Ashfield North and
Croydon LATM plan includes consideration of speed signs and a pedestrian
refuge, or other proper traffic calming measures within the vicinity of the
Pembroke Street / Orpington Street intersection. 4. That Council reviews the prioritisation of the suburban streets surrounding Ashfield Park within the InnerWest@40 program.
|
Background
Ashfield park has been noted by
council as one of the more popular recreational spaces within the Inner West -
it is the largest park within the North Ashfield area and plays host to a
number of events, monuments, sporting codes, a community garden and the
Ashfield bowling club.
Surrounded by mid-rise apartments it is a crucial plot of greenspace that is
frequented by foot by nearby residents.
The surrounding streets also acts as inflows from major arterial roads
including Liverpool rd and Parramatta road, while Orpington st on the north
side of the park is an entry point to the WestConnex tunnel / Parramatta road
interchange. The 406 bus route also stops on both the northern and
southern sides of the park.
To support the ongoing safe access to Ashfield Park by pedestrians, young
resident Akira Cheema has collated a petition of over 37 signatures calling on
increased pedestrian safety at the Orpington/ Pembroke intersection.
“With such extensive use of the
park comes the concern for safety. There are currently no pedestrian crossings
or speed signs at the intersections leading to the park, presenting potential
danger for park-goers every day. The risk is even higher for children, elderly
individuals, or anyone with limited mobility.”
There are currently no speed signs or markers on Orpington street, with one sign midway down Pembroke street. Pedestrian refuges are currently installed at the Pembroke / Ormond intersection and the Orpington/ Parramatta road intersection with no infrastructure supporting pedestrian mobility at the Orpington/ Pembroke intersection.
Recommendations in the 2018 Plan of Management have included the surrounding suburban streets to have their speed limits reduced from 50 km p/h to 40, which has been reaffirmed by the InnerWest@40 program.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
|
1.⇩ |
Local Petition |
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Key Site Silver Street Open Space
From: Councillor Victor Macri
|
MOTION
1. That Council investigate as part of the LEP process for the Marrickville Town Centre the potential to create additional open space in Silver Street, Marrickville (between Marrickville Road and Calvert Street) connecting to the Alex Trevillian Plaza.
2. That Council seek clarification from staff on the required control framework to establish additional basement public parking to support this proposed open space and offset the loss of on-street parking within the adjacent residential and commercial blocks identified for uplift.
3. That Council investigate the potential widening of Illawarra and Marrickville Lanes via dedication by providing incentives to future redevelopment sites to support this proposal.
|
Background
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Commemorating the 80th anniversaries of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on 6 and 9 August 1945
From: Councillor Olivia Barlow
|
MOTION
1. That Council commemorates the 80th anniversaries of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on 6 and 8 August 1945, and honours the memory of more than 210, 000 people who perished as a result of these attacks. We pay tribute to the Hibakusha (atomic bomb survivors) and Hibakunisei (second-generation survivors), and acknowledge the enduring impacts of nuclear weapons on human lives, health and the environment.
2. That Council affirms that nuclear weapons continue to pose an unacceptable threat to humanity and our shared environment, and expresses deep concern about the catastrophic humanitarian and ecological consequences of any use of nuclear weapons, whether by design, accident or miscalculation.
3. That Council reiterates that all people, including those in the Inner West, have the right to live in a world free from the threat of nuclear annihilation and supports efforts to educate and engage younger generations about peace, disarmament and global cooperation.
4. That Council notes that the Inner West Council endorsed ICAN’s Cities Appeal, a global initiative for cities, towns and local governments to show support for the TPNW, in 2018 and calls again on the Australian Government to sign and ratify the Treaty without delay.
5. That as a community committed to peace, Council will explore opportunities to raise awareness of this issue locally and explore opportunities to hold commemorative activities around Hiroshima and Nagasaki Day, including by engaging with local schools and community groups.
|
Background
In August 2025, the world will mark the 80th anniversaries of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These attacks resulted in the immediate and long-term deaths of over 210,000 people, with many more suffering from the enduring impacts of radiation exposure, illness, and generational trauma. Survivors, known as Hibakusha, and their descendants, Hibakunisei, have been powerful voices for peace and nuclear disarmament.
Despite international efforts to reduce nuclear stockpiles, over 12,000 nuclear weapons still exist globally, many on high alert. The risk of accidental or intentional use remains alarmingly high, with experts warning of catastrophic humanitarian and environmental consequences that would transcend national borders.
In response, the United Nations has adopted the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) in 2017, the first legally binding international agreement to comprehensively ban nuclear weapons, with a focus on humanitarian consequences. In 2018, this Council voted to endorse ICAN’s Cities appeal, a call from councils all over the world for their governments to endorse this Treaty. We were joined by a number of other councils in this call, including the City of Sydney and Newcastle. The Treaty entered into force in 2021 and in that same year, a motion in support of the Treaty was passed unanimously at the ALGA National General Assembly in Canberra. However, Australia still has not yet signed or ratified the Treaty.
On the 80th anniversary of this tragedy the Inner West Council can renew discussion in our community about peace and disarmament, and place additional pressure on our Federal Government to finally take action for the future of our children and the international community. Our Council has a proud history of supporting peace, sustainability, and community education. Taking the time to mark this anniversary with renewed efforts on the Cities Appeal is consistent with Council’s values and offers a meaningful opportunity to engage local residents—especially young people—in global citizenship and peacebuilding.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Koori Knockout Live Screening
From: Councillor Olivia Barlow
|
MOTION
1. That Council commit to hosting a live screening of the 2025 Koori Knockout Women’s and Men’s Grand Finals at a suitable location.
2. That preference should be given for Camdenville Oval to host the live screening, due to its historical association with the tournament, but Council should work with the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Advisory Committee to identify a suitable alternative venue if Camdenville Oval cannot be used.
3. That Council consult with the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Advisory Committee, the organisers of the Koori Knockout and National Indigenous Television (NITV) about the best way to host the screening event.
4. That Council prepare a report on costs, including pathways for funding this event on an annual basis, by the August 2025 Council meeting.
|
Background
The 2025 Koori Knockout will be played on October 3-6, at the Riverside Sporting Complex in Tamworth. This rugby league tournament has grown into one of the largest Indigenous gatherings in Australia and has a proud local history.
The Camdenville Oval was the site of the first Koori Knockout in 1971, a fact the State Government recently acknowledged with the unveiling of a Blue Plaque there. Attendance at that unveiling proved that the Koori Knockout is still of significant interest to a number of Inner West residents. In fact, requests were made by residents for Council to stream last year’s competition, but unfortunately these requests came too late for suitable arrangements to be made.
The Inner West should celebrate our historical ties to this incredible sporting event with a live screening of the Koori Knockout Women’s and Men’s Grand Finals. A live screening would allow residents who can’t attend the event in person an opportunity to still enjoy the event amongst family, friends and community. This is an opportunity for Council to celebrate First Nations history and culture in the Inner West and builds on our track record of championing cultural and racial diversity in the Inner West and platforming women in sport.
Council has hosted live screenings of sports before due to their popularity with residents, including the FIFA Women’s World Cup in 2023, and provides a live screening of Mardi Gras on annual basis. In addition to championing the Koori Knockout locally, hosting a screening like this is another opportunity to make historic events like this more accessible to Inner West residents and represents a significant economic opportunity for surrounding businesses.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Bower Bike 1st birthday
From: Councillor Jo Carlisle
|
MOTION
1. That Council congratulates Ben Norgrove and the team at Bower Bikes in the Bower Reuse and Repair Centre at the Inner West Sustainability Hub in Summer Hill on their first birthday.
2. That Council notes that Bower Bikes have saved more than 630 bikes from landfill in 12 months.
3. That Council notes the fantastic work of the Bower Bikes team in repairing bikes, upcycling new bikes, teaching bike repair skills and building community connections.
|
Background
Bower Bikes was established in May 2024 at the Inner West Sustainability Hub at Summer Hill as part of the Bower Reuse and Repair Centre.
In 12 months, Bower Bikes have saved 630 bikes from landfill. The team at Bower Bikes can repair bikes, teach the community to repair their own bikes and repurpose bike parts into brand new bikes. The team are even building e-bikes!
Bower Bikes celebrated their birthday in May with a great community BBQ at the Sustainability Hub.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Hercules Street, Ashfield cleanliness
From: Councillor Jo Carlisle
|
MOTION
1. That Council notes the successful street beautification initiatives along Hercules Street, Drakes Lane, Fox's Lane, and Brown Street in Ashfield, including the installation of planter boxes, bench seating, and integrated bin storage facilities.
2. That Council recognises these streets serve as critical pedestrian corridors with high foot traffic, connecting residents and visitors to Ashfield train station, bus stops, and the vibrant local commercial precinct including shops, bars, cafes, and restaurants.
3. That Council reaffirms its commitment to maintaining high standards in this precinct through: a) Regular bin collection services to prevent overflow and maintain hygiene standards b) Consistent street cleaning schedules appropriate to the high pedestrian usage c) Rapid removal of graffiti d) Ongoing maintenance of street furniture and landscaping elements to preserve the aesthetic improvements
4. That Council requests staff to ensure continued maintenance of this area.
|
Background
Ashfield is on track to be the next Inner West Council Entertainment Precinct. Locals and visitors come to Ashfield for our incredible food, with some of the best dumplings in the city, and now for live music with Miss Celie’s developing a strong reputation for live jazz music and great cocktails.
Hercules Street is also set to be dual named Quong Tart Plaza in recognition of Quong Tart’s who was a celebrated philanthropist, businessman, keen cricketer, bagpiper and Ashfield local.
Hercules Street is the gateway to Ashfield for people travelling to the suburb by train.
The new planter boxes and bench seats have been a fantastic addition to the area and have been welcomed by the community, but too often the first sight you see when crossing Brown Street are the overflowing bins and broken bin storage boxes. Graffiti has been increasing, with some of the murals in the laneways being vandalised and not refreshed.
Hercules Street and the surrounding laneways are in need of a bit of regular TLC to preserve the aesthetic improvements and build a greater sense of pride and respect for our vibrant suburb.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Inner West Active Transport Survey
From: Councillor Kerrie Fergusson
|
MOTION
1. That Council engages a consultant specialising in Active Transport to conduct a comprehensive Inner West wide survey of residents.
2. That Council ensures the survey gathers community feedback on priorities and preferences for the future design of streets and neighbourhoods, and identifies the infrastructure needed to create safer streets, more liveable communities, and reduce reliance on cars for short trips.
3. That Council schedules the survey to be conducted in November 2025.
4. That Council receives a report at the September 2025 Council meeting detailing survey costs, funding opportunities, and proposed methods for conducting the survey.
|
Background
Council has recently committed to building 35,000 new homes across the Inner West over the next 15 years. It’s a bold target, but one that reflects the scale of the housing crisis we face. Delivering more homes is essential, and so is ensuring the neighbourhoods they’re built in are safe, connected, and sustainable.
It’s not just about where people live, it’s about how they live and through increasing density we have the opportunity to seriously consider the design of our streets and the way we move. This is a real opportunity to shape the future of the Inner West in a way that supports more active, accessible, and liveable communities. Or in the words of Premier Chris Minns, to “city-shape.”
The soon to be completed GreenWay is a great example. Stretching from Iron Cove to the Cooks River, it’s set to become the Inner West’s active transport backbone, a project driven by the community, particularly local advocate Bruce Ashley, and delivered by Council. It shows what’s possible when the community leads and Council backs that vision.
Last month Council hosted Shifting Gears: The GreenWay and Beyond, a forum that brought together local stakeholders to discuss what’s needed to support more liveable, people friendly communities. Many great ideas and initiatives came out of this event, but one thing in particular that stood out was the need to go beyond stakeholder engagement and connect further with the residents of the Inner West.
The Inner West Active Transport Survey is about listening. As our neighbourhoods grow and density increases, it asks residents how they see their communities in the future, what they want their streets to look and feel like, and how they want to move through them.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Floodlighting upgrade Birchgrove Oval
From: Councillor Kerrie Fergusson
|
MOTION
1. That Council initiates the design and Development Application (DA) process for a floodlighting upgrade at Birchgrove Oval, in accordance with the AS/NZS 2560 series standard for Club Level Match Lighting at 200 lux.
2. That Council provides a progress report on the design and DA process to Council at the August 2025 Council Meeting.
|
Background
Birchgrove Oval’s floodlighting system is currently scheduled for upgrade in 2030. At over 15 years old, it is among the oldest sporting ground floodlighting infrastructure in the Inner West. Currently, floodlighting at Birchgrove provides 44 lux average of illumination, which falls well short of the 200 lux recommended by Australian standards for club-level matches and training.
The limited lighting makes it difficult and potentially unsafe for local sporting teams to train during evening hours. This increases the risk of injury and creates safety concerns for players and families when leaving the oval after dark. As a result, the oval cannot be fully utilised for training and matches during the times when many local teams need it most.
Local sports grounds are already under significant pressure due to high demand, a floodlighting upgrade in line with the AS/NZS 2560 series standard will improve safety, increase the oval’s usability, and help support the growing needs of our community’s sports teams.
This motion is to initiate the design and DA process required to upgrade the floodlighting at Birchgrove oval with the view to bring forward the upgrade and include in the 25/26 or 26/27 budget cycle.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Kids Play / Kids Say - Playground Consultation
From: Councillor Kerrie Fergusson
|
MOTION
1. That Council formalises the process of engaging with local preschools and primary schools by establishing a Kids Play / Kids Say Community Engagement Program to gather feedback on the design and upgrade of playgrounds. The program may draw on consultation practices used in the Inclusive Playgrounds engagement process and include: a) Interactive sessions conducted at local preschools and primary schools; b) Onsite interactive sessions at playground locations; and c) Invitations for schools to participate in the formal opening of newly upgraded playgrounds.
2. That Council provides a report to the September 2025 Council Meeting outlining how the Kids Play / Kids Say program will operate, including how children will participate, the level of input they will have, and the criteria for engagement (e.g. playground size).
|
Background
Playgrounds are for kids, so it makes sense that they should have a say in how they’re designed. Including local children in the engagement process results in playgrounds that are more inclusive, creative, and better used by the community.
In the last term of Council, Clr Howard led the call to deliver an Inclusive Playground in every ward built on the belief that all kids have the right to play. The program uses a targeted engagement strategy to ensure the needs of children with disabilities and the broader community are reflected in the playground design. It has set a new benchmark for how we approach these projects.
Kids Play / Kids Say builds on that work. It formalises child friendly engagement as part of Council’s process, using fun and accessible activities in preschools, primary schools, and at playground sites. It’s about hearing directly from the children who use these spaces and giving them a chance to shape them.
Inviting schools to take part in playground openings helps students build a stronger connection to their local park and feel proud of the role they played in shaping it. At a time when many families are experiencing housing insecurity, fostering a sense of local belonging is more important than ever. This approach helps strengthen community ties and supports deeper emotional connections to place.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Biodegradable dog waste bags main street trial – Balmain / Rozelle
From: Councillor Kerrie Fergusson
|
MOTION
1. That Council provides biodegradable dog waste bags along the Darling Street main streets in Rozelle and Balmain.
2. That Council ensures bags are attached to Council bins to improve accessibility and encourage responsible disposal of dog waste.
3. That Council commences a 12-month trial beginning in September 2025.
4. That Council receives a report within 12 months of the trial’s commencement outlining the outcomes, with a view to expanding the program to other main streets across the LGA if successful.
5. That Council provides a report to the August 2025 Council Meeting detailing the rollout, including how the imitative will be funded, the start date and a map showing the locations where bags will be available.
|
Background
Dog waste continues to be a regular issue raised by residents and shop owners, particularly along Darling Street in Rozelle and Balmain. While most dog owners do the right thing, there are still too many instances of dog poo left on footpaths and in gutters, which creates an unpleasant environment and can impact public health and
local waterways.
Providing biodegradable dog waste bags, especially when attached to Council bins, makes it easier for dog owners to do the right thing and helps keep our streets clean.
This motion proposes a 12 month trial of free dog waste bags in high use areas along Darling Street.
A report will be brought to Council before the rollout with a map and timeline, and a follow-up report after 12 months will evaluate the trial’s success, with the aim of expanding it to other main streets across the Inner West if successful.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Pedestrian safety intersection of Marion Street and Renwick Street, Leichhardt
From: Councillor Philippa Scott
|
MOTION
1. That Council note the line marking upgrades at the intersection of Renwick Street and Marion Street, Leichhardt approved in March 2025 and due to be completed in July 2025, which are primarily designed to reduce vehicle conflict at the intersection and to improve vehicle safety.
2. That within six months of the completion of the works, Council survey the following surrounding residents regarding potential additional road treatments designed for pedestrian safety. a) Residents of Renwick Street between Marion Street and Cary Street; b) Residents of the south side of Marion Street between Renwick Street and Cromwell Street; and c) Parents, carers and employees of Only About Children Leichhardt (Marion Street) childcare.
|
Background
Marion St, Leichhardt is a busy pedestrian thoroughfare taking residents from Ramsay St, Haberfield to Norton St, Leichhardt. The south side of Marion St includes Lambert Park, a busy sporting ground; Marketplace Leichhardt, a busy shopping centre; many cafes and businesses; a pub and a childcare centre. Only two intersections on the south side of Marion St have no signalisation, at Edith St and Renwick St. Renwick St is the wider and harder to navigate of these two intersections, with difficult sightlines into the steep part of Marion St. Renwick St is the intersection immediately west of Norton St, and pedestrians and visitors to Little Italy, as well as neighbours on the residential streets surrounding, also cross Renwick St to get the Norton St precinct.
Recent works were approved to improve the intersection for vehicle safety, which will reduce conflict between cars and buses, and also will reduce confusion between pedestrians and motorists regarding priority at the intersection. However, more could be done to prioritise pedestrian safety, especially given the location of the Only About Children childcare at this corner, which has a large number of drop offs both from walking families and others parking on nearby streets and walking across the intersection - there is no car park at the centre.
Following the completion of the works already approved, Councils should survey the immediate neighbours and the families and employees of Only About Children to see if more could be done to improve their safety while on foot.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Improving Pedestrian Safety on Pemell Lane, Newtown
From: Councillor Chloe Smith
|
MOTION
1. That Council allocate $40,000 for the installation of signs and road markings identifying Pemell Lane as a 'shared zone' with a 10km/h speed limit, with funding to be sourced through the next quarterly budget review.
2. That Council provide an update to the Traffic Committee upon completion of the design process, including whether any additional funding is required.
|
Background
Pemell Lane is a narrow laneway running between Simmons Street and Reiby Street in Newtown and directly behind the Enmore Theatre. The laneway is pedestrianised due to its proximity to Enmore Road and residential streets, is also frequently used by vehicles accessing the Enmore Theatre back-of-house loading area or rat-running to avoid the main street, and increasingly by food delivery cyclists. The narrow footpath means pedestrians and vehicles have to share the roadway.
Pemell Lane was proposed as a 'shared zone' in the Newtown Local Area Traffic Management study completed in 2019. However, it has not been prioritised for inclusion in the capital works program since then.
Improving pedestrian safety around main streets and in particular the Enmore Road Special Entertainment Precinct is a worthwhile investment. Installing clear signage and road markings identifying Pemell Lane as a 'shared zone' will ensure that vehicle access for live music and entertainment at the Enmore Theatre doesn't come at the expense of pedestrian safety.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Apprentices, trainees and cadets
From: Deputy Mayor Mat Howard
|
MOTION
1. That Council acknowledge the vital contribution of apprentices, trainees and cadets to Inner West Council.
2. That Council notes Inner West Council has been successful in securing funding to hire and support 29 new apprentices, trainees and cadets through the NSW Government’s Fresh Start program.
3. That Council thanks the Minister for Local Government, the Hon Ron Hoenig MP, the Minister for Skills and Training, the Hon Steve Whan, and the Minister for Skills and Training, and the United Services Union for their work to support apprentices, trainees and cadets through the Fresh Start program.
4. That Council hosts an annual reception event for apprentices, trainees and cadets thanking and acknowledging their contribution to the work of Council.
|
Background
Inner West Council continues grow our pool of apprentices, trainees and cadets across all of Council’s directorates.
This is critical to supporting young people to gain skills, establish secure pathways to meaningful employment, and ensuring our community and organisation gains maximum benefit of working with young skilled workers.
The Inner West Council has successfully secured funding under the Minns Government’s Fresh Start program Start Program, which aims to expand opportunity for apprentices, trainees and cadets in the local government sector.
This will provide for the hiring and support of a further 29 apprentices, trainees and cadets across council directorates. This is the single largest allocation of funding for any council in NSW.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Marrickville Library maintenance blitz
From: Deputy Mayor Mat Howard
|
MOTION
1. That Council conduct an audit of maintenance at the Marrickville Library.
2. That Council undertake a program of escalated maintenance to ensure proper upkeep of this award winning local landmark within the next three months.
3. That Council provide a report to councillors on the works undertaken and any other pertinent information via councillor briefing note upon the completion of works and no later than October 2025. |
Background
Marrickville Library at Patyegarang Place opened in 2019 and has become a beloved landmark and highly utilised local service. In 2021, it was nominated for the International Public Library of the Year Award in 2021, making it one of the top five libraries in the world.
Several residents have reported that the library is in need of maintenance work, including repairs to the timber external doors and replacement of carpet.
Escalating a program of maintenance will ensure the library continues to maintain the highest standard of infrastructure and public service delivery in the city.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Extended season at Steel Park Waterplay Park
From: Deputy Mayor Mat Howard
|
MOTION
That Council provide a report to the August 2025 Council meeting detailing the feasibility of extending the opening season at the Steel Park Waterplay Park, Illawarra Road, Marrickville South for a month prior to (September) and one month following (April) the current season, in line with other seasonal aquatic centres managed by Council.
|
Background
The Steel Park Waterplay Park at Illawarra Road, Marrickville, is a popular local park for families in South Marrickville.
The current opening season (1 October to 1 April each year, inclusive) was set during the period when it was managed by Belgravia. Now that the Waterplay park is managed in-house, along with council’s other aquatic centres, there is an opportunity to extend the season.
Council will shortly commence consultation on upgrading Steel Park as a fully inclusive playground.
Given that we are experiencing extended periods of warmer weather, extending the season at the waterplay park will give families more opportunities for safe and accessible outdoor recreation.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Circular economy support and promotion
From: Deputy Mayor Mat Howard
|
MOTION
1. That Council note the success of the Circular Economy Roundtable held in May 2025 and thanks staff for their diligence, expertise and hard work in organising it.
2. That Council acknowledges the critical leading role local organisations play in sustaining and supporting the circular economy in the local community, NSW and Australia.
3. That Council establish a database on local organisations working in the circular economy, including locations, contact information and donations that can be made.
4. That Council includes a feature on the circular economy in a future edition of the Inner West Community news, including: a) A pull out map identifying local organisations, their locations, contact information, and the types of donations that can be made at each location; b) Initiatives and services from the Inner West Council that assist residents to responsibly dispose, recycle and reuse materials and waste; and c) A QR code linking to the Inner West Waste Calendar and other information about waste and the circular economy.
5. That Council provide a report back to councillors via councillor briefing note on the outcomes of the Circular Economy Roundtable by September 2025.
|
Background
A Circular Economy Roundtable was held in late May 2025, bringing together leading local organisations working in the circular economy.
One of the key proposals arising from discussion was the opportunity for council to better support and promote the work of organisations and link local residents to resources and services they offer.
Noting the success of other trails - such as the Creative Arts Trail and Inner West Ale Trail - participants suggested council could develop resources to better promote the work of local circular economy organisations.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Airspace land adjacent to St Peters Town Hall
From: Deputy Mayor Mat Howard
|
MOTION
1. That Council note there is a considerably sized block of land immediately adjacent to St Peters Town Hall owned by Air Services Australia (Commonwealth Government) that has remained vacant since the opening of the third runway at Sydney Airport.
2. That Council prepare a report to the August 2025 Council meeting: a) Outlining possible uses for the land to maximise community benefit in the event that the Commonwealth Government agreed to transfer ownership of the land to Inner West Council; and b) Detailing the process by which Inner West Council might request a transfer of ownership of the land.
|
Background
There is a sizeable block of land immediately adjacent to St Peters Town Hall that has been vacant for decades.
Given the proposed increase in local density and council’s interest in investigating opportunities for new open green space and enhanced community benefit of public land, it is prudent for Inner West Council to consider options for how to best negotiate with the Commonwealth Government over the current use of the land.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Notice of Motion: Inner West Flood Management Advisory Committee Terms of Reference amendment
From: Deputy Mayor Mat Howard and Councillor Olivia Barlow
|
MOTION
That Council amend the Terms of Reference for the Inner West Flood Management Advisory Committee to: a) Remove reference to a quorum, consistent with the Inner West Traffic Committee; and b) Include a member of the Inner West Access Local Democracy Group to attend and hold voting rights as a member of the Committee.
|
Background
These reforms are necessary in order to ensure the effectiveness and representativeness of the Inner West Flood Management Advisory Committee.
Officer’s Comments:
No further comments were required for this Notice of Motion.
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Question on Notice: Greenway Art Prize
From: Councillor Liz Atkins
Comment by the General Manager:
Answers to the questions will be provided at the Ordinary Council meeting in August 2025.
The annual GreenWay Art Exhibition and Art Prize has grown over 15 years to become one of the premier community-driven visual arts events in the Inner West. It has received cash and in-kind sponsorship from IWC and its predecessor councils for most of that time. Last year the exhibition was launched at White Bay Power Station, as part of the Power Up Festival. 325 community art works were submitted, prizes with a value of over $13,000 were awarded, community art works with a value of $18,900 were sold and the White Bay exhibition was visited by over 1000 people. Despite this profile and community following, the future of the Art Exhibition is now in jeopardy due to the closure of ArtEst, its principal sponsoring partner.
Question
In 2024 an Agreement was signed with ArtEst for council to contribute $35,000 towards the cost of the art exhibition in 2024 and the same amount again in 2025. What specifically were those funds to be used for?
Question
Following the closure of ArtEst in early 2025, can you advise if the $35,000 commitment in Council funding for 2025 is still available?
Question
If the 2025 funding has been reallocated, at what date was that decision taken? Was a proper analysis done of the pro’s and con’s of such a decision, in particular the significant impact on the substantial GreenWay arts community which has grown up over the past 15 years?
Question
Who took the decision to move that funding away from the Greenway Art Prize? Where was the money reallocated to and what was the rationale in terms of the overall benefit and cost to the inner west arts community?
Question
Was the Greenway Community Forum advised that this funding was in jeopardy and if not, why were they not involved in the decision?
Question
What if any plans does Council have to maintain its involvement and funding of the GreenWay Art Exhibition in the future, particularly in light of the anticipated opening of the $68 mil GreenWay Missing Links in late 2025?
Does the art exhibition and the GreenWay Arts and Community Culture Program in general have a future?
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Question on Notice: Inner West Housing Plan
From: Councillor Liz Atkins
Comment by the General Manager:
Answers to the questions will be provided at the Ordinary Council meeting in August 2025.
Question
How much has Council spent so far on independent planning, architectural and other experts in developing the Our Fairer Future plan which is currently on exhibition:
a) In total
b) On each individual consultant including but not limited to:
i. Hassell
ii. Architectus
iii. Cred Consulting
iv. GML Heritage
v. Worley Consulting
vi. Urbis
vii. Biosis
viii. Atlas Economics
ix. Djinjama
Nil.
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: RFT 09-24 Print and Associated Services Tender Evaluation Report
Council at its meeting on 20 May 2025 resolved that the matter be deferred.
Prepared By: Margaret Merten - Marketing, Media & Communications Coordinator
Authorised By: Peter Gainsford - General Manager
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
1: An ecologically sustainable Inner West 5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
DISCUSSION
Council will move into a closed session to deal with RFT 09-24 Print and Associated Services Tender Evaluation Report as the information is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(c) and (10A(2)(di) of the Local Government Act 1993. The matter is deemed that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
Pursuant to section 10A(2), 10(2) and 10A(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public will be excluded from the meeting on the basis the business to be considered is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(dii) of the Local Government Act 1993.
|
Confidential Report RFT 09-24 Print and Associated Services Tender Report - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(ii) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the council. |
|
|
VendorPanel Evaluation Report RFT 09-24 Print and Associated Services - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(ii) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the council. |
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Contributions and Reimbursements
Council at its meeting on 20 May 2025 resolved that the matter be deferred.
Prepared By: Matthew Pearce - General Counsel
Authorised By: Peter Gainsford - General Manager
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
DISCUSSION
Council will move into closed session to deal with the Contributions and Reimbursements, for information which is classified as confidential under Section 10A(2)(g) of the Local Government Act 1993. The matter is deemed confidential, as the matter contains advice concerning litigation, or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege.
Pursuant to section 10A(2), 10(2) and 10A(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public will be excluded from the meeting on the basis that the business to be considered is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(d)(g) of the Local Government Act 1993.
|
Confidential report - Contributions and Reimbursements - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to advice concerning litigation, or advice (Section 10A(2)(g) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege. |
|
|
Advice from Lindsay Taylor Lawyers - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to advice concerning litigation, or advice (Section 10A(2)(g) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege. |
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Potential Acquisition of TfNSW owned property at 2 Hay Street Leichhardt (car park)
Prepared By: Daniel East - Senior Manager Strategic Planning
Authorised By: Simone Plummer - Director Planning
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
DISCUSSION
Council will move into a closed session to deal with Potential Acquisition of TfNSW owned property at 2 Hay Street Leichhardt (car park) as the information is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(d)(i) and section 10A(2)(d)(iii) of the Local Government Act 1993. The matter is deemed confidential as, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it and if disclosed reveal a trade secret. (Potential Council acquisition of property owned by TfNSW and valuation).
Pursuant to section 10A(2), 10(2) and 10A(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public will be excluded from the meeting on the basis the business to be considered is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(d))(i) and section 10A(2)(d))(iii) of the Local Government Act 1993.
|
Confidential Report - Potential Acquisition of TfNSW owned property at 2 Hay Street Leichhardt (car park) - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(iii) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed reveal a trade secret. |
|
|
Valuation Report 2 Hay Street - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(iii) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed reveal a trade secret. |
|
|
Valuation Report Annexures 2 Hay Street - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(iii) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed reveal a trade secret. |
|
|
TfNSW Submission to PRCUT Planning Proposal Response 21 May 2024 and 27 Nov 2023 - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
|
1 July 2024 Correspondence from DPHI to IWC letter re: funding solutions for 2 Hay Street - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(iii) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed reveal a trade secret. |
|
|
IWC Letter dated 20 Feb 2024 to Transport Minister - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(iii) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed reveal a trade secret. |
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Licence to Wests Tigers for Leichhardt Oval
Prepared By: Rocco Sergi - Acting Strategic Investments & Property Manager
Authorised By: Scott Mullen - Acting Director Property and Major Projects
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
|
DISCUSSION
The Wests Tigers are a professional rugby league club who have teams in the National Rugby League (NRL) and National Rugby League Women’s (NRLW) competitions. Leichhardt Oval No. 1 is one of four home grounds played at by the Wests Tigers, and they have been using this location since the year 2000.
As part of the 2025 NRL competition the Wests Tigers have requested the use of Leichhardt Oval for three (3) home NRL matches and two (2) home NRLW matches.
Council will move into a closed session to deal with Licence to Wests Tigers for the use of Leichhardt Oval as the information is classified as confidential under (10A(2)(di) of the Local Government Act 1993. The matter is deemed, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
Pursuant to section 10A(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public will be excluded from the meeting on the basis that the business to be considered is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993.
|
Confidential Report - Licence to Wests Tigers for use of Leichhardt Oval - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
|
Licence signed by Wests Tigers - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Quarterly Strategic Investment Property Report
Prepared By: Rocco Sergi - Acting Strategic Investments & Property Manager
Authorised By: Scott Mullen - Acting Director Property and Major Projects
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This quarterly Strategic Investment Property report provides Council with updates on the performance of the Commercial Property Investment Portfolio for Council’s property at Liverpool and at Warrawong.
A summary of financial performance is provided below for each of the two properties. Further information of a confidential nature is provided in the confidential report.
The combined net income from the investment properties for this quarter is $1,008,076.
The data provided is to the end of quarter three of FY2024/25 (31 Mar 2025).
DISCUSSION
203 NORTHUMBERLAND STREET LIVERPOOL
A summary of the financial performance of the property is provided below:
Revenue
The revenue is $2,725,952 vs Budget $2,622,888 which is over budget (favourable) by $103,064 (3.6%). Year to Date - Accrual Basis (From 1 July to 25 April 2025).
The additional revenue is predominantly related to office space:
- (Suite 501) budgeted to be vacant and now leased to Neami.
- (Suite 504) budgeted to be vacant and renewed with Credit Repair.
Expenses
The total Building Expenses including Operating Expenditure, Direct Recoveries and Owner Expenditure is $498,547 vs Budget $470,797which is over budget (unfavourable) by $27,750 (5.89%).
Capital Works
The revised capital budget for FY 2024/25 is $232,000 with the main items including mechanical, some works to the façade and waterproofing. Minor works have commenced, and major works have been programmed to commence in Q1 2025/26.
The overall ten-year capital budget for the property, as detailed in the EY Due Diligence Analysis at time of purchase, has been incorporated into Council’s Long Term Financial Plan.
67 KING STREET WARRAWONG
A summary of the financial performance of the property is provided below:
Revenue
The total revenue is $1,482,754.45 vs Budget $1,488,022 which is under budget (unfavourable) by $5,268 (0.35%). Year to Date - Accrual Basis (From 1 July to 25 April 2025).
Expenses
The total Building Expenses are $389,224 vs Budget $367,742 which is over budget (unfavourable) by $12,482 (3.39%).
The increased expenditure includes $6,091 Direct Recoveries which is recovered from tenants. The remaining costs incurred relate to the timing of repair and maintenance payments. Whilst a budget allowance has been made for repair and maintenance items, an even phasing of the spend over the year had been assumed, however the cost will only be incurred when works are carried out).
Capital Works
The revised capital budget for FY 2024/25 is $278,000. Minor works commenced, and major capital works are scheduled to commence in Q1 2025/26. The main items including carpark resurfacing, some works to structural elements and roof finishes.
The overall ten-year capital budget for the property, as detailed in the EY Due Diligence Analysis at time of purchase, has been incorporated into Council’s Long Term Financial Plan.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications associated with the implementation of the proposed recommendations outlined in the report.
Council will move into closed session to deal with the Quarterly Strategic Investment Property Report for additional information which is classified as confidential under Section 10A(2)(d)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993. The matter is deemed confidential, as the matter is commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
Pursuant to section 10A(2), 10(2) and 10A(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public will be excluded from the meeting on the basis that the business to be considered is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(d)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993.
|
Confidential Report - Quarterly Strategic Investment Property Report - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: RFT 10-25 Steel Park and Hammond Park Sporting Grounds Upgrade
Prepared By: Michael Craven - Projects Delivery Manager
Authorised By: Scott Mullen - Acting Director Property and Major Projects
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1. |
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
3: Creative communities and a strong economy |
|
4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
DISCUSSION
Council is undertaking upgrades to the existing Steel Park and Hammond Park Sporting Grounds, delivering improved playing surface and upgraded LED sports lighting to meet the overall community’s needs.
Council will move into closed session to deal with the Mackey Park Sporting Ground Construction Tender, for information which is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(c) (of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
Pursuant to section 10A(2), 10(2) and 10A(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public will be excluded from the meeting on the basis that the business to be considered is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993.
|
Confidential - RFT 10-25 Vendor Panel Evaluation Report - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Stage 2 Upgrade Construction Contract EOI
Prepared By: Stuart Hull - Senior Manager Capital Works
Authorised By: Scott Mullen - Acting Director Property and Major Projects
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
2: Liveable, connected neighbourhoods and transport 4: Healthy, resilient and caring communities |
|
|
DISCUSSION
Council is undertaking upgrades to the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre that includes the construction of new heated 8-lane 50m pool and a heated 25m pool (from zero to 2.1m depth with movable floor and accessible device), spectator seating and shade structures, new first aid, lifeguard, and storage rooms, new fully electrified pool heating system and filtration plants for 50 m and 25 m pools, accessibility lift and upgraded stairs to access the rear turfed area along with re-turfing, accessible pathway link and new picnic shelter.
Council will move into closed session to deal with the Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Stage 2 upgrade Construction contract EOI, for information which is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(c) (of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
Pursuant to section 10A(2), 10(2) and 10A(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public will be excluded from the meeting on the basis that the business to be considered is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993.
|
Confidential Report - Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre - Stage 2 DC contract EOI evaluation report (Final) - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business. |
|
|
EOI 02-25 Leichhardt Park Aquatic Centre Upgrade - Vendor Panel Evaluation Report (Final) - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business. |
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Bignell Lane, Annandale
Prepared By: Rocco Sergi - Acting Strategic Investments & Property Manager
Authorised By: Scott Mullen - Acting Director Property and Major Projects
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
DISCUSSION
Council will move into a closed session to deal with the Bignell Lane, Annandale matter as the information is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(c) and section 10A(2)(dii) (of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business and that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
Pursuant to section 10A(2), 10(2) and 10A(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public will be excluded from the meeting on the basis the business to be considered is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(c) and section 10A(2)(di) of the Local Government Act 1993.
|
Confidential Report - Bignell Lane Annandale - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
|
6 June 2025 - Bignell Lane Letter from Landcom - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature (Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
|
|
Council Meeting 17 June 2025 |
Subject: Return of Notional Member Interest from CivicRisk Mutual Limited
Prepared By: Julian Sakarai - Acting Senior Manager Governance and Risk and Sajjad Ali - Acting Chief Financial Officer
Authorised By: Chris Sleiman - Acting Director Corporate
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1.
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
This report supports the following strategic directions contained within Council’s Community Strategic Plan:
|
5: Progressive, responsive and effective civic leadership |
|
|
DISCUSSION
Council will move into a closed session to deal with the Return of Notional Member Interest from CivicRisk Mutual Limited matter as the information is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(c) (of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business and that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
Pursuant to section 10A(2), 10(2) and 10A(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public will be excluded from the meeting on the basis the business to be considered is classified as confidential under section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993.
|
Confidential Report - Return of Notional Member Interest from CivicRisk Mutual Limited - Confidential This attachment is confidential in accordance to information (Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993) that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business. |
